<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mtbr Forums - Ibis</title>
		<link>http://forums.mtbr.com/</link>
		<description />
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:08:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Chain Tensioner for Mojo SL</title>
			<link>http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/chain-tensioner-mojo-sl-789157.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>OK--Ive searched for too long--a bunch of people were using a chain tensioner, it was about $50 and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>OK--Ive searched for too long--a bunch of people were using a chain tensioner, it was about $50 and zipped tied onto the frame--I was meaning to buy one and cant find a link--Thanks</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/">Ibis</category>
			<dc:creator>Trackho</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/chain-tensioner-mojo-sl-789157.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>2.1 Tires on Mojo HD</title>
			<link>http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/2-1-tires-mojo-hd-789068.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I ride with some serious hammer head XC'rs and was thinking of going to a 2.1 Weirwolf on my HD for...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I ride with some serious hammer head XC'rs and was thinking of going to a 2.1 Weirwolf on my HD for a little less rolling resistance and weight.  I still want to hammer down hills too....within reason.  Currently I run 2.3 Weirwolfs and really like them.<br />
<br />
Anyone run a 2.1 on theire HD?  Weirwolf 2.1?<br />
<br />
Thanks.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/">Ibis</category>
			<dc:creator>canuck_tacoma</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/2-1-tires-mojo-hd-789068.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Running a 140mm fork on a Mojo HD 160mm</title>
			<link>http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/running-140mm-fork-mojo-hd-160mm-788997.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
sorry for barrage of questions, but I am trying to figure out what I can have and some of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
sorry for barrage of questions, but I am trying to figure out what I can have and some of the compromises I'll need to make. From what I have read, the Moho HD in the 140mm configuration loses some of the plushness that comes with having an extra 20mm of travel. I like the idea of a plush rear suspension as our trails are pretty gnarly, but I don't think I need the extra travel up front. My idea would be to run the Mojo HD with a 140mm fork and the CC Angleset, so that I keep the slack front end, but keep the 160mm of travel at the back. Is that a good idea or not? The bike might have a bit of an unbalanced feel, but I am trying to see where I could lose a little bit of weight on the bike. Or would I be better off with sticking to 140mm front and back and use the Angleset to get the slacker head angle?<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot in advance.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/">Ibis</category>
			<dc:creator>dbblackdiamond</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.mtbr.com/ibis/running-140mm-fork-mojo-hd-160mm-788997.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

