Results 1 to 68 of 68
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,116

    What tires are you running?

    Plenty of threads on this topic in the wheels and tires forum, but thought it would be cool to compile what people in the region are running and your thoughts/review of the tires (also where and what type of riding you do).

    My ulterior motive to starting this thread is to find ideas for replacing the stock rear Specialized s-works Renegade tire that came on my Stumpy 29er. If there is any level of dampness, that tire is useless.
    Last edited by Shibby; 06-25-2012 at 09:46 AM.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Swerny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,758
    Schwalbe Racing Ralph 29 x 2.25 rear
    Schwalbe Nobby Nic 29 x 2,25 front

    Set up tubeless with Stan's on Arch/ZTR wheels

    XC/trail riding.
    Mike
    Toronto, Canada
    2016 Trek Farley 7
    2017 Diamondback Haanjo Trail Carbon
    2016 Scott Solace 10 Disc

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ghettocruiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,443
    Tires: RaceKing Supersonic (run tubeless).

    Usage: Eastern GTA

    Used Since: 2009 (on my 3rd set)

    Recommend them to others: Probably not.
    The above statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration

  4. #4
    '11 Opus Strat
    Reputation: shawnt2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    464
    26" CST Comp Copperhead's on Alex Ace17 rims., First higher-end bike I've owned ( 2011 Opus Strat ) Came on the bike and really impressed with them so far. I do all types of riding, but mostly MUT or scooting around town and they perform very well on any surface, Even a smooth ride with the trailer hooked and kiddo in it!.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    416
    Rocket Ron F / Racing Ralph R

  6. #6
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Shibby View Post
    My ulterior motive to starting this thread is to find ideas for replacing the stock rear Specialized s-works Renegade tire that came on my Stumpy 29er. If there is any level of dampness, that tire is useless.
    I had the same complaint about the OEM Continental Mountain King 2.2 that came on the Rocky Mountain Altitude carbon that I bought last summer; they were OK in the dry but very sketchy in the damp & wet on roots and even rock to the point I didn't want to ride the bike in these conditions!
    So I recently replaced them with Continental Mountain King 2.4 front & rear which besides being wider also has a different tread pattern than the 2.2 does! Amazing...couldn't believe the difference! Grip is much improved in the damp but even better this bike ( 5.5" travel ) now just floats over the gnar, roots & rocks of my home trails at Buckwallow! They roll really well too, surprisingly! I run about low to mid 20's psi although the side wall recommends 50-60 psi !!
    No way would I run even close to that pressure, I would be bouncing and boinging off roots & rocks constantly on these trails.
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  7. #7
    Evil Jr.
    Reputation: garage monster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,859
    Front: Racing Ralph 2.25
    Rear: Racing Ralph 2.1

    Mounted to Crank Brothers Cobalt 29s.

    Inflated to around 20psi unless I start to rim-out.

    Great all-around tire. I've used them everywhere for XC from BC to Pennsylvania and all over the place in Ontario.
    Please enjoy seeing this terrible collection of me - something wonderful is about to happy.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    24
    Here at Laguna Seca, home of the Sea Otter, I am running Sworks Fast Trak 2.0 in front and rear. They are fast and stick on turns.

  9. #9
    I Strava Hamburgers
    Reputation: 14Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    726
    Front: Maxxis Ikon 2.2 @ 28PSI Tubed
    Back: Maxxis Ikon 2.2 @ 32PSI Tubed

    If its muddy I swap to Rocket Rons, same PSI.

  10. #10
    Lemmy Rules!
    Reputation: Unglued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,772
    Have recently switched from Racing Ralph 2.2's to Contintental X-King 2.2's with Black Chili compound, mounted tubeless to Stans' Arch EX. I ride cross-country on a rigid singlespeed.

    The jury is still out on the x-kings. They are very light and fast and seem to grip fine in dry to moderately damp, but there is something that feels a little odd about them that I cannot quite put my finger on. I will likely keep them on the bike for the rest of the season but I expect, all things being equal, that I will ultimately go back to Racing Ralphs.
    Strava made me do it....

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bomber495's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    121
    29x2.2 Conti Race Kings set up tubeless with Stans Arch EX. Love these tires. Fast and lots of grip in dry to moderately wet conditions. Use mostly at the hydrocut in KW, and at Kelso.

  12. #12
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Shibby View Post
    Plenty of threads on this topic in the wheels and tires forum, but thought it would be cool to compile what people in the region are running and your thoughts/review of the tires (also where and what type of riding you do).

    My ulterior motive to starting this thread is to find ideas for replacing the stock rear Specialized s-works Renegade tire that came on my Stumpy 29er. If there is any level of dampness, that tire is useless.
    when you decide to get rid of Renegade - PM me...

  13. #13
    Team NFI
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,299
    Conti Gravity on the Mistress. Vitoria CX tires on the CX beast.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by wake2dirt View Post
    Here at Laguna Seca, home of the Sea Otter, I am running Sworks Fast Trak 2.0 in front and rear. They are fast and stick on turns.
    Interesting - I've got a Fast Trak on the front. Maybe I'll move it to the back and get another one, or something even more aggressive, for the front.

  15. #15
    Perpetual Hack
    Reputation: mykel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,977
    2.35 Schwalbe Hans Dampf in Trailstar compound for general trail riding.
    2.4 Schwalbe Big Betty 2ply in Vertstar for Gravity days.

    Pressures depend upon conditions, but to hold up my 230lb rtr weight...

    Front 24-28psi
    Rear 27-32psi

    michael
    A Dirtbag since 1969
    A Knomer since 2007

    Knolly Podium
    Knolly Delirium
    Knolly Endorphin

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    170
    26x2.5 Minion DHF EXO 3C F&R running tubeless at 20-something psi - been riding these pretty much everywhere since they hold air better tubeless than my Kendas
    26x2.5 Nevegal DH F&R w/DH tubes - on my DH wheelset
    26x2.35 Nevegal StickE F&R running tubeless - like the tires but have taken them off in favor of the Minions because they're leaky and sidewalls were insufficient for my last big trip
    26x2.1 Nevegal StickE UST F&R - on my XC bike which I haven't ridden at all this year.

  17. #17
    Trail Gnome
    Reputation: ray.vermette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    444
    Question for those on Racing Ralphs: what flavour are you running? EVO, Snakeskin, Double Defense, etc? And what width?

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Shibby View Post
    Interesting - I've got a Fast Trak on the front. Maybe I'll move it to the back and get another one, or something even more aggressive, for the front.
    Try the FAST Trak Control or the Captain. I ran the Captain up front and handled great just not as fast.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    24
    Good Question. I would like to know myself.

  20. #20
    Nice day for a ride..... Moderator
    Reputation: Bikin' Bric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,936
    Front - 29x2.35 Maxxis Ardent - 24psi
    Rear - 29x2.1 Maxxis Crossmark - 29psi

    250lbs rider, XC riding, lots of sand down my way and works great, works pretty good on the clay / hardpack stuff too.
    Bikin' Bric's Bike Blog

    2012 Norco CCX3
    2014 Nashbar Fat Bike
    2016 RSD Catalyst 700+
    2016 RSD Sergeant

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,042
    Conti Race King 2.2 in the cheap wire bead version for my commuter/light duty bike. This bike gets a roughly even mix of road, gravel paths, and singletrack trails. Darn fast, good traction on hardpack & rocks, but gets sketchy on soft loose dirt and is useless in the wet. It's good at climbing and rolling fast but the rest of the package leaves something to be desired, cornering has to be done weight forward with authority or foot down moto-style to get the tires to bite, otherwise the front washes out too easily.

    My good bike has Conti Mountain King (version II) 2.2 tires with the Black Chili rubber and Protection sidewalls. This bike gets ridden on everything you can find off-road, but not in the wet if I can help it since tracking down vintage drivetrain parts is not fun. These tires have tons of traction, so much in fact that I've clipped trees on the inside of corners because I'm expecting the tires to break traction and drift outwards, instead, they just grip and rail around the turns. Climbing grip is probably equal to the Velocirators I once had, if I can keep the cranks turning they'll keep digging into the ground to get me up the slope. The only weakness I've found so far is wet tree roots, they'll spin out when I'm standing and putting the power down in granny ring on a climb, but so will every other tire that I've tried to date. Currently my favourite tire.

    Also have a set of Tioga Factory XC 1.95 tires on a backup wheelset for my good bike. Rolls like a slug, but great traction in soft loose dirt and hardpack. Doesn't rail turns as well as the Mountain King and when it loses traction it does so without much warning. And it's a horror show in the wet, it slides badly on everything and if I hit wood or stone the bike is going down.

  22. #22
    dru
    dru is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,444
    I never ride in the wet so I run an Ardent (f) and racing ralph (r) on the 29er, and Python Air lights on the 26er.

    Drew
    occasional cyclist

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: want to ride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    340

    my set up....

    Racing Ralph's on Crest rims running tubeless on 29er HT....

    I will change the rear for Maxxis Aspen 2.1 and give it a try,we'll see how it goes...

    I'm pretty light; <150 pounds,and I ride at Durham Forest a lot...

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bomber495's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by ghettocruiser View Post
    Tires: RaceKing Supersonic (run tubeless).

    Usage: Eastern GTA

    Used Since: 2009 (on my 3rd set)

    Recommend them to others: Probably not.
    Curious why you wouldn't recommend if you have gone back to these a few times. Is it just quick wear?

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by bomber495 View Post
    Curious why you wouldn't recommend if you have gone back to these a few times. Is it just quick wear?
    The supersonic is the super light super fast version of the Raceking tire, it's kinda fragile and finicky, to me it's a pretty specialized tire with a fairly narrow range of applications for certain riders who know exactly what they want. It's not a general purpose tire that's suitable for most riders under most conditions, most riders will kill the tire or hate it because it's not made for what they need.

  26. #26
    Trail Gnome
    Reputation: ray.vermette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    444
    I recently switched from the Racing Ralph EVO 2.1 to the EVO 2.25 Snakeskin version (both run tubeless) and I am liking the change.

    The 2.1 non-snakeskin versions were lighter, but the trails I ride most often are very rocky and the tires would fail due to sidewall abrasion long before the tread was worn out. The sidewalls on the snakeskins are holding up very well.

    The snakeskin versions sealed easier, leak less air, and don't weep Stans through the sidewalls like the non-snakeskin versions.

    I get a little bit more volume with the 2.25, which I expect translates into a slightly larger tread footprint, slightly more cushioning, slightly less chance of bottoming out, and the option to run at slightly lower air pressure versus the 2.1

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    18
    Rocket Ron, snakeskin, 2.25, 25 psi, rear, excellent except on wet rocks. Set up tubeless with Orange seal sealant

    Maxxis Crossmark 2.25, 23 psi, front. Tubeless with Orange seal sealant.

    These tires have been great this year, WAY better than the heavy slow rolling Nevegals I foolishly had on before.

  28. #28
    wwg
    wwg is offline
    No Class
    Reputation: wwg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    98
    Continental Rubber Queen 2.4 front
    Maxxis Crossmark 2.25 rear
    Q: Who's faster than me?
    A: Just about everybody, including your oldest living relative.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Mtb130's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    15
    Maxxis HighRoller 2.35" on SunRingle
    Singletracks. Hardpack and loose over hardpack. So-Cal riding.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    61

    ray.vermette

    My Racing Ralphs are the EVO flavour, 2.25. I run them front & rear. Thought they might feel too wide on my 29er but I have been totally happy with them.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thewake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    207
    I've been running and loving Racing Ralphs (evo 29er, 2.4) on both front and rear.

    I've just order some Haven wheels. anyone ever mount these RRs on Havens? I'd like to take advantage of the tubeless possibilities, but wondering if I'll need new rubber. I really like the ralphs, especially the high volume 2.4s, and indeed I'm planning on buying the new 2.35s when the 2.4s wear out., so I'd rather not switch.

  32. #32
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,060

    EVO version, 2.25

    They are narrower than one would expect from 2.25... I also have Snakeskin but they are heavier and I didn't see any benefits from thicker sidewall... EVO version sealed perfectly and they hold air very, very well... I had Racing Ralph on my front wheel today at Sudbury O-Cup... Held up just fine on the sharp rock...

    I believe that the new Specialized Fast Track - S-Works version, may be better than Racing Ralph - lower rolling resistance and about the same lateral grip... I am really impressed with Specialized line of tires... Had Renegade S-Works (sub 500grams tire) on my rear wheel today at Sudbury as well... It held up very well in tough conditions... and it is FAST...

    Quote Originally Posted by ray.vermette View Post
    Question for those on Racing Ralphs: what flavour are you running? EVO, Snakeskin, Double Defense, etc? And what width?

  33. #33
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,060

    don't know which version of EVO 2.1

    you are talking about, but 2012 EVO TL is MUCH better than 2011 and/or older. They seal much better and hold air excellent. I would not bother with 2.1 though... 2.25 would be perfect, as they run narrower for the advertised size...

    If weight is not a concern - Snakeskin is hard to beat, for peace of mind...


    Quote Originally Posted by ray.vermette View Post
    I recently switched from the Racing Ralph EVO 2.1 to the EVO 2.25 Snakeskin version (both run tubeless) and I am liking the change.

    The 2.1 non-snakeskin versions were lighter, but the trails I ride most often are very rocky and the tires would fail due to sidewall abrasion long before the tread was worn out. The sidewalls on the snakeskins are holding up very well.

    The snakeskin versions sealed easier, leak less air, and don't weep Stans through the sidewalls like the non-snakeskin versions.

    I get a little bit more volume with the 2.25, which I expect translates into a slightly larger tread footprint, slightly more cushioning, slightly less chance of bottoming out, and the option to run at slightly lower air pressure versus the 2.1

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ghettocruiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,443
    Quote Originally Posted by aerius View Post
    The supersonic is the super light super fast version of the Raceking tire, it's kinda fragile and finicky, to me it's a pretty specialized tire with a fairly narrow range of applications for certain riders who know exactly what they want.
    Thanks for answering this so well on my behalf, I forgot I posted here and totally wasn't paying attention.
    The above statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration

  35. #35
    Trail Gnome
    Reputation: ray.vermette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    444
    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post
    you are talking about, but 2012 EVO TL is MUCH better than 2011 and/or older. They seal much better and hold air excellent. I would not bother with 2.1 though... 2.25 would be perfect, as they run narrower for the advertised size...

    If weight is not a concern - Snakeskin is hard to beat, for peace of mind...
    Haven't tried the 2012 version yet.

    The plain evo was definitely lighter than the snakeskin. If the trails I road most often were less rocky, or if I simply had better bike-handling skills to avoid rubbing said rocks in the first place, I'd keep using the non-snakeskin version.

    2.25 are great. I agree, they run narrower than I expected for the advertised size.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Unglued View Post
    The jury is still out on the x-kings. They are very light and fast and seem to grip fine in dry to moderately damp, but there is something that feels a little odd about them that I cannot quite put my finger on. I will likely keep them on the bike for the rest of the season but I expect, all things being equal, that I will ultimately go back to Racing Ralphs.
    There's definitely something a bit wonky with them. They grip fine but it feels like the tire has somewhat of a vague floaty feeling, there's a lack of feedback and I find it harder to tell how hard the tire is working and how much grip it has left before it lets go. It also wanders more and gets bounced off track easier than the Race King or Mountain King. Out of all the Conti tires I have they're my least favourite, I just can't ride them with confidence.

  37. #37
    ez5
    ez5 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by broadwayline View Post
    Rocket Ron F / Racing Ralph R
    this, in 2.25 size is the best all around combo for 29er riding i have come across.

    so far i have used (all tubeless on arch rims):

    rocket ron
    racing ralph 2.4/2.25
    race kings
    geax aka
    raven 2.2 (currently rear of my FS)
    kenda happy medium (currently rear of my rigid)
    specialized ground control
    Ardent (currently front of my rigid)
    ikon
    wolverine
    weirwolf
    exiwolf
    rampage
    karma

    if you are looking to replace your rear tire i would say race king or racing ralph are your best all around bet, the difference being race king doesnt have as much bite in corners but rolls a bit faster, RR is lighter.

    if you want a dry hardpack rear tire i would say raven 2.2 for FS or kenda happy medium on a hardtail depending on if you want lightweight (raven) vs cornering grip (kenda).

    i would say currently happy medium is my favourite rear tire because of how hard you can lean in on corners but still is like riding a slick on everything else. ive also used it up front on a p35 and it is equally fast and fun but a little scary in hard braking situations.

    rocket ron is my favourite front tire by far and seems to grip like nothing ive ever used but still rolls fast and is lighter than most slicks. its also an excellent mud tire front and rear.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EvilScience's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    220
    Running 26" rocket ron's on my sadly unused FS bike.

    Loving a far less popular setup on the 26" rigid SS - 2.35 Panaracer Rampage up front, 2.25 Cinder in the rear. Heavy and not the fastest rolling, but cushy and grips like nobody's business!

  39. #39
    Lemmy Rules!
    Reputation: Unglued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,772
    Quote Originally Posted by aerius View Post
    There's definitely something a bit wonky with them. They grip fine but it feels like the tire has somewhat of a vague floaty feeling, there's a lack of feedback and I find it harder to tell how hard the tire is working and how much grip it has left before it lets go. It also wanders more and gets bounced off track easier than the Race King or Mountain King. Out of all the Conti tires I have they're my least favourite, I just can't ride them with confidence.
    You put your finger on it exactly. They get really unpredictable when at the limit. I really tried to like these tires but I put the Ralphs' back on. Much better.

    The X-kings have, however, found a home on my wet weather/mud wheels. They shed mud really well so I think that will work out quite nicely...
    Strava made me do it....

  40. #40
    X-Ray Guy
    Reputation: Jawz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    320
    Kenda Nevegals 2.1 DTC Front and Rear until i wear through them.

    Mostly XC/AM riding. They came stock on my Trance and once they wear through i think i might try the Racing Ralphs with everyone seeming to enjoy them here. Also considering Kendas Slant Six or Karmas

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Near north's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    459
    Wtb Weirwolf 2.55 STANS ZTR FLOW 29 (looking for something a bit wider).
    I ride mostly in the Muskokas' on rock and roots with a small amount of dirt in between.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    664
    Minion DHF. 2.5 3C EXO. Good all around tire for our local trails. Think rocks and roots, typically wet. Traction trumps rolling resistance around here.

    I'm really interested in the Hans Dampf as well. Think I'll have to pick up a pair and give 'em a go.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    167
    Minion DHF 2.35 maxxpro 60A (F) and soon to be Nobby Nic 2.25 SS Evo tubeless (R). Too many flats + high pressure (38-40 psi) on the rear Mountain King I 2.2.

    Super XC/trail 140mm bike.
    Main bike : Altitude RSL 70 '11
    DH bike : Aurum 2 '12

  44. #44
    GAME ON!
    Reputation: saturnine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,969
    rear - schwalbe racing ralph dd 2.25 @ 25 psi tubeless
    front - schwalbe nobby nic evo 2.4 @ 28 psi tubeless

    26"
    RIP Adam Yauch

    "M.C. for what I AM and do, the A is for Adam and the lyrics; true"

  45. #45
    GAME ON!
    Reputation: saturnine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,969
    Quote Originally Posted by thewake View Post
    I've been running and loving Racing Ralphs (evo 29er, 2.4) on both front and rear.

    I've just order some Haven wheels. anyone ever mount these RRs on Havens? I'd like to take advantage of the tubeless possibilities, but wondering if I'll need new rubber. I really like the ralphs, especially the high volume 2.4s, and indeed I'm planning on buying the new 2.35s when the 2.4s wear out., so I'd rather not switch.
    i have one on my carbon haven rear (double defense). went on easier than any tire i've ever mounted. no weeping, no leaking. no mess. other tires, not so lucky.
    RIP Adam Yauch

    "M.C. for what I AM and do, the A is for Adam and the lyrics; true"

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,773
    Quote Originally Posted by ez5 View Post
    if you want a dry hardpack rear tire i would say raven 2.2 for FS or kenda happy medium on a hardtail depending on if you want lightweight (raven) vs cornering grip (kenda).

    i would say currently happy medium is my favourite rear tire because of how hard you can lean in on corners but still is like riding a slick on everything else. ive also used it up front on a p35 and it is equally fast and fun but a little scary in hard braking situations.
    I am running a 2.1 Happy Medium DTC/UST and I am shocked at how awesome this tire is. It has blown me away how much traction is has for a semi slick. I've rode it on steep technical trails with damp roots both climbing and descending and it has yet to let me down.

    On the front I've been running a 2.1 BBG DTC/UST and it's equally as amazing. The lateral grip on these is like a full on DH tire. They are super fast rolling then rail corners when you need them. A word of caution is you need to ride them aggressive and lean your bike into the corners to get the grip. Some drift then lean the bike over and it's all grip.

    Super impressed with this tire combo.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Thatshowiroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,501
    This is my first season on the Racing Ralphs 2.25, tubeless front and rear. The rear is great, but the front washes out when cornering, at least once per ride, and down I go.
    From the recommendations on this thread, I think I'll try a Rocket Ron on the front.

  48. #48
    Evil Jr.
    Reputation: garage monster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,859
    Quote Originally Posted by Thatshowiroll View Post
    This is my first season on the Racing Ralphs 2.25, tubeless front and rear. The rear is great, but the front washes out when cornering, at least once per ride, and down I go.
    From the recommendations on this thread, I think I'll try a Rocket Ron on the front.
    Are they on the right way? Ralphs go in different directions front and rear and it makes a big difference. I only ask because I once spent about 2 weeks with a rear on backwards and it made my bike nearly unrideable.
    Please enjoy seeing this terrible collection of me - something wonderful is about to happy.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Thatshowiroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,501
    I'll have to check.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: secret agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    781
    The new 29er came with the Mavic Cossmax tires. I had been running the RR's on my 26ers for a while and I actually bought a set for the new bike as well. It turns out that I really like these for all the riding so far. I was pleasantly surprise how well they have performed in everything from Kelso to Buck to the Agreement Forest and Puslinch. I am probably going to throw on the RR's once it gets a bit greasier out on the trails in the fall.

  51. #51
    Team NFI
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,299
    Round ones that are made with rubber and have an inner tube.

  52. #52
    livin' large
    Reputation: canadian-clydesdale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    534
    26 X 2.5 Nevegals (front and rear) on DH (Rocky Flatline), work well and refuse to die although quite heavy (mostly ride at Blue mountain on this)

    26 x 2.35 Nevegal front on trail bike (Yeti SB-66) cause it's wide and grips and had it kicking around when Fat Albert gave up the ghost

    26 x 2.35 Minion dhf on rear, climbs well, brakes well, and corners awesome (mostly ride at Hilton Falls and other rocky rooty trails in the Georgetown area)

    Bontager 700x25 on road bike (vini steel) to ride on road and rail trails and anywhere else i can pedal a rigid bike with slick tires

    Small block 8 26x1.95 on singlespeed (cadex cfm1) to ride around town to various drinking holes and houses of ill repute
    it tied the room together man!

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,773
    Quote Originally Posted by Enduramil View Post
    have an inner tube.
    Inner tube???? What is this the 17th century?

    Tubeless man. It's soo worth it. Unless all you do is ride sandy poddle paths.

  54. #54
    No. Just No.
    Reputation: Circlip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,149
    Quote Originally Posted by garage monster View Post
    Are they on the right way? Ralphs go in different directions front and rear and it makes a big difference. I only ask because I once spent about 2 weeks with a rear on backwards and it made my bike nearly unrideable.
    Ya, but you would have had better braking on the rear running it in the "front" orientation. It all depends on whether your goal is to optimize traction for pedaling or braking on the rear, although for a Racing Ralph genre of tire the assumption is usually the former.

    Conversely, with no pedaling forces/input to the front there's no logical reason to run the Racing Ralph on the front in anything other than the designated front orientation.

    For cornering I see the difference in front vs. rear orientation of the Racing Ralph to be negligible.

    For some other tires that don't have the sloped ramp centre knobs like the Ralphs, I have used my own best judgement and preferences for what orientations regardless of the manufacturer's markings, especially when I used to have a couple of freeride bikes where I was interested primarily in maximizing braking traction both front and rear. Big volume, low pressure. Didn't really need the extra benefit of having the sloped ramps favouring pedaling and climbing.

  55. #55
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,060

    pot calling kettle...

    what kind of post is this? the man likes his inner tube and you shouldn't piss in his coffee...

    maybe he is using tubulars, for all intents and purposes, which puts him ahead of your archaic tubeless technology... i mean tubular tires have inner tube and outer tube. i think. correct me if i am wrong shirky.

    besides, anyone can ride tubeless tires, it is almost like cheating... hard core rads ride with inner tube. truth be told, i always ride with my inner tube on me.

    having said all that, i think between Racing Ralphs and Rocket Rons - it is hard to find another combo that works well in all conditions as far as i am concerned...

    thank you all, thank you very much...

    Quote Originally Posted by shirk View Post
    Inner tube???? What is this the 17th century?

    Tubeless man. It's soo worth it. Unless all you do is ride sandy poddle paths.

  56. #56
    Team NFI
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,299
    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post

    maybe he is using tubulars, for all intents and purposes, which puts him ahead of your archaic tubeless technology... i mean tubular tires have inner tube and outer tube. i think. correct me if i am wrong shirky.
    I can't recall what it was called back in old Yugoslavia. But as I was told real hard men don't ride tubulars or clincher tires with tube. They ride some mutant half breed item that mounts to a standard clincher rim. Yet is built as a tubular.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: want to ride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    340

    bummer....

    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post
    what kind of post is this? the man likes his inner tube and you shouldn't piss in his coffee...

    maybe he is using tubulars, for all intents and purposes, which puts him ahead of your archaic tubeless technology... i mean tubular tires have inner tube and outer tube. i think. correct me if i am wrong shirky.

    besides, anyone can ride tubeless tires, it is almost like cheating... hard core rads ride with inner tube. truth be told, i always ride with my inner tube on me.

    having said all that, i think between Racing Ralphs and Rocket Rons - it is hard to find another combo that works well in all conditions as far as i am concerned...

    thank you all, thank you very much...
    I can't give you +rep for this, first I have to spread out some more,but I would!

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    11
    Old ones. Panaracer Fire XC Pro.

  59. #59
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,347
    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post
    what kind of post is this? the man likes his inner tube and you shouldn't piss in his coffee...

    maybe he is using tubulars, for all intents and purposes, which puts him ahead of your archaic tubeless technology... i mean tubular tires have inner tube and outer tube. i think. correct me if i am wrong shirky.

    besides, anyone can ride tubeless tires, it is almost like cheating... hard core rads ride with inner tube. truth be told, i always ride with my inner tube on me.

    having said all that, i think between Racing Ralphs and Rocket Rons - it is hard to find another combo that works well in all conditions as far as i am concerned...

    thank you all, thank you very much...
    Hey... I am now officially a hard core rad!! Cool, this is way better than old geazer!!
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  60. #60
    Trail Rider
    Reputation: mck.brad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24
    Kenda Nevegals 2.1 DTC front and rear on a f/s bike. Only type I've bought for the last 6 or so years. Suck in mud tho, but hard pack they're excellent!

  61. #61
    Over the bars...
    Reputation: egggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    483
    geax saguaro 29 x2.2 Same in 26 on my other bike. I like em but not great at shedding mud...

  62. #62
    mtbr Decade+
    Reputation: Biggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,543
    With all due respect to a thread with 60 posts and appearances by local legends, RKJ, BCD and the Bulgarian Geezer, Okosolo, it is neither about the bike nor the tires.

    Pick up some old bald Cdn Tire cheapies and support:

    PSYCLESTORE: Home

    Rumour has it their opening a theme based prostitution Division.
    "I love being on a bike. It helps me feel free. I get it from my dad", by Guillaume Blanchet

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Thatshowiroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,501
    Quote Originally Posted by garage monster View Post
    Are they on the right way? Ralphs go in different directions front and rear and it makes a big difference. I only ask because I once spent about 2 weeks with a rear on backwards and it made my bike nearly unrideable.
    So. There are two arrows on the sidewall. One says back, and the other says front. The front arrow is pointing to the front. I'm assuming this is correct.

  64. #64
    Up, Up, and Away!
    Reputation: SuprGrovr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    252
    "Front" shows the direction of rotation if mounted on the front. "Back" shows the direction of rotation if mounted on the back.

    Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk 2

  65. #65
    humber river advocate
    Reputation: singlesprocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6,368
    ahhhhh tires... the first thing blamed when performance is poor.

    tastes in tires change as fast as a new version of i-what ever...

    couple things to note about mtb tires:

    -the bigger the tire the more traction you will have (contact patch rulz!)
    -the more the tire looks like a road bike tire the faster you will go
    -lighter is better until you reach the sidewall thickness of a condom
    -tubeless tires are fantastic until you get a flat (in the winter when it is -40c out)
    -big soft knobs (not the band) give traction in wet roots
    -hard knobs (giggle) are good for high speed hard pack
    -side knobs are good
    -the more money you spend on tires the faster the tires will wear out
    -studded tires are the shizzle on ice
    -next year there will be a willy wonka wonder tire that does everything well that costs more then your car tires...
    broadcasting from
    "the vinyl basement"

    build trail!

  66. #66
    Evil Jr.
    Reputation: garage monster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,859
    Quote Originally Posted by Thatshowiroll View Post
    So. There are two arrows on the sidewall. One says back, and the other says front. The front arrow is pointing to the front. I'm assuming this is correct.
    That sounds right. Maybe Ralphs just aren't for you?
    Please enjoy seeing this terrible collection of me - something wonderful is about to happy.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,773
    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post
    what kind of post is this? the man likes his inner tube and you shouldn't piss in his coffee...

    maybe he is using tubulars, for all intents and purposes, which puts him ahead of your archaic tubeless technology... i mean tubular tires have inner tube and outer tube. i think. correct me if i am wrong shirky.

    besides, anyone can ride tubeless tires, it is almost like cheating... hard core rads ride with inner tube. truth be told, i always ride with my inner tube on me.
    ahh muffin did I step on your love of tubes?

    I was a hold out on going tubless far too long. Flats were all to common on my rides. I've seen the light and it's not tubes.

    I still carry a tube in my pack in case the tubeless goes pffffffft. Gotta love how easy it is to trail side fix a tubeless issue with a tube. They have their place, but for most off road riding they are a think of the past like toe clips or canti brakes.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by Thatshowiroll View Post
    So. There are two arrows on the sidewall. One says back, and the other says front. The front arrow is pointing to the front. I'm assuming this is correct.
    For a front tire, the front arrow should be pointing in the direction the tire rotates. For a back tire, the back arrow should be pointing in the direction it rotates.

    I've found that I sometimes need to shift my weight forwards to keep the front tire planted depending on the bike and tire combination.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •