Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,123

    Derailer and Chain Length

    I switched from a long cage XT to a med cage XT. Should I remove links? The chain is measured big/big rings plus 2 links with suspension distance taken into account. It seems alittle long.

  2. #2
    Giggitty giggitty!!
    Reputation: dhpimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    325
    Yes, you will need to remove a couple links if you are running a triple. If you are switching from a triple to double then re-measure your chain length in the big/big+2 combo.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by dhpimp
    Yes, you will need to remove a couple links if you are running a triple. If you are switching from a triple to double then re-measure your chain length in the big/big+2 combo.
    I apologize, this may sound dumb but some people use the word couple loosly and do not mean exactly 2. Please confirm that I would measure big/big + 0.
    Last edited by bikenut316; 07-19-2006 at 04:42 PM.

  4. #4
    Know any good trails?
    Reputation: Ouchies's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    91
    I read on these boards that the formula works for all derailleurs regardless of their lengths. So, big/big + 2 (no derailleur involved in the measurement.)
    Me: "You're welcome to sleep over here in the A/C."
    Her: "I appreciate the offer, but I will just sleep in the tent."

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,754
    Quote Originally Posted by Ouchies
    I read on these boards that the formula works for all derailleurs regardless of their lengths. So, big/big + 2 (no derailleur involved in the measurement.)
    I agree, both SRAM and Shimano say to use the big/big approach plus 2 links. You don't warp it around the derailleur when setting the length. This works fine on both my long and medium cage derailleurs.

    Wombat

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    127
    If you make your chain big/big+2, should you be able to shift to the big/big combo? I know you "shouldn't" do this but ...

    My LBS installed a new chain and there ain't no way it will shift to big/big.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    127
    Anyone?

  8. #8
    a e i o u and sometimes y
    Reputation: Brizn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    111
    I'm interested for more response as well....as I've heard big/big+2 and have heard the "bottom-pulley-at-4o'clock-position -in-big/big" to measure chain length.

  9. #9
    On MTBR hiatus :(
    Reputation: Speedub.Nate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,144
    Quote Originally Posted by WildJackal
    should you be able to shift to the big/big combo?
    Yes. That's the whole point behind the "big-big" method: just enough chain to safely shift to big ring and big cog and not break anything.

    Like Wombat wrote, the derailleur isn't involved in this process, so cage length has no impact on chain length.

    Last edited by Speedub.Nate; 07-25-2006 at 05:16 AM.
    speedub.nate
    MTBR Hiatus UFN

  10. #10
    Silence and Thunder...
    Reputation: xjbebop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,211
    just make sure your new derailleur won't be maxed out in the big/big setting (for safety's sake, but never shift there...). Break your chain, thread it thru everything while on the big/big gears, and pull it together by hand. You'll see when the der is stretched to max, then back it off a link or two...reassemble the chain at that point/length.

    ...you'll most likely find that it's about the same length as the standard big/big measurement mentioned earlier...for future reference.
    ...every day sends future to past...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •