Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Mountain Bike Addict
    Reputation: enduroprorider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004

    32t vs 36t Chain Ring

    Other then four teeth, what are the advantages and disadvantages of a 32t middle chain ring vs. a 36t middle chain ring.


    "Keep the rubber side down."

  2. #2
    i like rocks
    Reputation: euroford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    i'm running a 34t

  3. #3
    neutiquam erro
    Reputation: Chris130's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    36t gives you higher gearing compared to a 32t. There's really no "advantage" or "disadvantage" - just depends on what you ride and what gears you like to hang out in. 32t middle rings have become a stock standard for whatever reason.

    Other than the chainring swap, there are no other modifications required to the rest of your drivetrain (assuming you are still running a big ring). If that "middle ring" is your biggest (i.e. a 2x9 or 1x9 setup), then you would also need to adjust your chainlength. I too rock a 34t chainring (middle ring position) on my 1x9.

    Cheers, Chris
    Now is the time on Sprockets when we hammer.
    '05 Blur Classic (1x9) || '06 SIR9 (SS) || '06 Brompton P6L

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    A 32 is a smaller diameter than 36, and a lot of bashguards are sized around the 32. This matters if you don't run the large chainring. I feel a little better with the small amount of added clearance when playing in rock gardens. Plus, they are one of the most common sizes, easy to replace. Finally, if your concerned with weight, there's some savings in the smaller chainring, rear cog, and less chain. I guess this last comment applys more to a SS.

Members who have read this thread: 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.