Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 1,000 of 2192
  1. #901
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,502
    Quote Originally Posted by eurospek View Post
    ^ how much was standard shipping? Quite the deal, i paid $150 for mine last week from crc.
    12.99

  2. #902
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    674
    Still satisfied with my point one podiums that I purchased in June 2010, they're just great.

  3. #903
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,468
    Quote Originally Posted by danglingmanhood View Post
    Still satisfied with my point one podiums that I purchased in June 2010, they're just great.
    Have you had the bearings replaced yet?
    konahonzo

  4. #904
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    79
    I bought my pair of Podiums in August 2010. The platforms have taken some hits and look pretty beat up, but I haven't had one problem with the bearings. They spin a little easier after 2+ years, that's the only difference. Love those pedals. That's why I just bought a spare set - if the originals ever do blow out, I wouldn't want to be without them while I wait to fix them.

  5. #905
    life on 2 wheels
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    109
    i like the ns aerial pedals. i have the loose ball just because i hate spending $120 on a pedal i end up regretting on buying. i was also happy with the atomlab gi pedals as it took a ford f250 to break them (literally).

  6. #906
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    20
    I already have a tendency to hit my chain stays with my heel, does anyone with the Staightline AMP have issues. Was thinking about getting them but since they sit closer to the crank I think it would be problematic for me.

    I am a big hope fan and really am tempted on the F20's

  7. #907
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    46
    Picked up a set of crampon ultimates for my anthem x29 and have to say I am extremely impressed, not only with the pedal but with the customer service from the Canfield bros. Cannot recommend them highly enough!

    Thanks guys!

  8. #908
    life on 2 wheels
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Gay biker View Post
    I always have problems with my pedels .the ones I buy are the cheapest I have ever seen and after a month or two they break. The price of these non branded pedels is about $1.25
    i dont see any problem there. they are the best pedal to have on your bike that all it does is sit on the trainer. think about jumping off a curb breaks those.

    buy some odyssey or some animal pc pedals. $20 and they do last. i have a pair of Hamiltons that has been to hell and back and they are going back on my park bike

  9. #909
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    20
    Okay, I just bought a set of the Crampon Ultimates. I emailed them with a couple questions and 20min later I had a response from Sean... and it's Sunday. Cant beat customer service like that!

    Cant wait to get some rides before the snow comes with these bad boys. I'll post my impressions soon

  10. #910
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,468
    Maybe someone can answer this for me, I just got my old pair of Point1 Podiums back from Point1 from a warranty rebuild BUT they aren't too stiff to turn like when they were brand new. I ended up buying another raw pair from CRC, and those are much stiffer to turn, just the same as these were when they were brand new also. Shouldn't my old ones that I got back today also be stiff to turn easily with new bearings and rubber seals? What am I missing here?
    konahonzo

  11. #911
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Are all seals in place on the rebuilt ones?
    If yes, do they look different from those on CRC pair?
    Is axial play detectable on the rebuilt pair?


    That was off the top of my head, I have not held Podiums in my hands and may be missing the po1nt.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  12. #912
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnozpikr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,684
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Random Psycho View Post
    That was off the top of my head, I have not held Podiums in my hands and may be missing the po1nt.
    Haha, that's good.
    2012 Intense M9
    2012 Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon
    2008 Look 595
    2007 Custom Litespeed Sewanee

  13. #913
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,468
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Random Psycho View Post
    Are all seals in place on the rebuilt ones?
    If yes, do they look different from those on CRC pair?
    Is axial play detectable on the rebuilt pair?


    That was off the top of my head, I have not held Podiums in my hands and may be missing the po1nt.
    All there, no difference between the two at all. There's a seal in the pedal body along with a seal on the axle itself. Nothing's missing. Opened them both up. I have a feeling I was only replaced the broken bearing, not a full rebuild.
    konahonzo

  14. #914
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by eurospek View Post
    I have a feeling I was only replaced the broken bearing, not a full rebuild.
    So it may be the worn (or just broken in) seals that don't drag as much as new ones, then.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  15. #915
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    452
    Spank Spike.. loving them after a couple months..

  16. #916
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack0207 View Post
    Picked up a set of crampon ultimates for my anthem x29 and have to say I am extremely impressed, not only with the pedal but with the customer service from the Canfield bros. Cannot recommend them highly enough!

    Thanks guys!
    I am looking at these for my bike. I am looking for something comparable to my DMR Vaults and these lookg to be BIG pedals. Do you have a pic?

  17. #917
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Crampons on the DH rig and Spanks on the AM - extremely pleased with both of them, but the Canfield's are a freeking work of art in a class by themselves IMO.

  18. #918
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    98
    Hi,
    Why should I think about replacing the standard pedals that's come with my Cube LTD Pro 2012?
    I got some V8 pedals as well with the deal but I have not installed them. I'm thinking the standard pedals are lighter (altho look smaller)

    Do I need more surface contact to be more efficient or comfort or something?
    Sorry I'm new and this bike is my first proper mountain bike
    Cannondale Flash 1 Alloy (May 01 2013)
    Cube LTD Pro 2012 16" on its way (Nov 25 2012 Ordered)

  19. #919
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,048

    ride.

  20. #920
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    I've just installed another pair of AMPs, with chromoly spindles, on my Spank Spoon one2one. Also used Superstar aluminum pins in an attempt to reduce sole wear. Installed with Locitie 222 (the weakest), pedal washers (cranks are Truvativ AKA) and black (thin) axial preload washers.


    Muscleflex,
    looks like stock pedals on Cube LTD Pro 2012 are just placeholders, typical narrow caged jobbies. You are expected to only use them for test fitting and parking lot test ride.

    However a surprising amount of first-time MTBers leave those pedals for extended amounts of time, years in some cases. I have to confess that I rode them for 5 weeks on my first MTB before going clipless (used clipless for some 3 years, then acquired a taste for real flats. Still prefer platforms on the small side of spectrum though, so that there is only one distinctly correct and easily felt foot placement, not unlike clipless).
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  21. #921
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Muscleflex View Post
    Do I need more surface contact to be more efficient or comfort or something?
    Most new model flat pedals should be big enough, the amount (and size) of pins in the pedal will determine how sticky your foot will be when riding. Not everyone likes too much stick because it makes slight foot adjustments too hard without having to lift your foot while others don't want any movement unless they lift their foot so you will see pin #s from 6 to 16.

    Personally I like a lot of stick so go for flats with 10+ pins but it's a matter of preference. Remember you can always take pins out but can't add any more than what they came with.

  22. #922
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    993
    This has become the whoever-has-the-thinnest-pedal-has-the-best-pedal thread. You want to the best pedal with the most grip? E13 lg1. You want more grip? Install the 7mm pins included in the box. Best part, when they look trashed you can get the replacement composite covers and BAM brand new pedals. Igus bushings, thin by yesterday's standards. There is none better. /thread

    e*13 LG1+ pedal - Tested - Pinkbike

  23. #923
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Saints are no better than e13?
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  24. #924
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drakche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    They are nearly half the price.

  25. #925
    mtbr member
    Reputation: metrotuned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,770

    Good job! Platform Pedals trending towards thinner platforms. QR option...

    csermonet: The trend is to make a pedal thinner but just as strong. The trend is the same with bikes in terms of lightness. There's always a compromise (tiny platforms = tiny bearings -or- replace bearings with DU bushings which wear out fast). The problem with the e13 pedals is their butt-ugly and look like plastic. Plastic pedals are popular in BMX, inexpensive, and are typically replaced quite often. The e13 pedals do not have "replace often" pricing, thus I've never been interested in e13's pedal offerings.

    Who's tried these pedals by Xpedo "Traverse 5 QRD" - they're quick release and light but there isn't much "platform". I was always curious about the pressure points these kinds of pedals create - not the lack of grip - like track pedals for the street with the "quill" style that put a lot of pressure onto two ridges on your shoe sole - e.g. foot cramping. 300g, $80 usd.

    p.s. Did White Industries release a QR style crankset recently that allows switching from clipless to platform pedals.

    Xpedo "Traverse 5 QRD" Pedal stock photo below:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Lead actor Will of the Sun, Author Platform Pedal Shootout 900K+ views

  26. #926
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Those QR pedals are mostly intended for folding bikes I think. Non-folding city bikes too can benefit: if you leave it U-locked in the street and take pedals with you, it's less attractive for thieves.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  27. #927
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2
    I still like my Flybikes (metal) Ruben pedals even though they're not the flattest or widest.

  28. #928
    You down with entropy?
    Reputation: esilvassy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    341
    I ended up getting a set of Canfield crampon ultimates.
    They were great on my week in Moab. I swapped in the shorter pins but did not put lock-tite on them and ended up loosing most of them in the first 3 days.
    even with low pin count traction was fine. I now have a mix of the long and short pins until I go source replacements of a more reasonable length.

    but comfortable and great traction, never slipped a pedal all week. This was with skate shoes and not something with super sticky rubber as well. Glad I got them, now I see another set for my wife's bike in the future.

  29. #929
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    ^ nice. I think I wanna get me some now. What pedals were you using before?

  30. #930
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    993
    Quote Originally Posted by illnacord View Post
    The problem with the e13 pedals is their butt-ugly and look like plastic. Plastic pedals are popular in BMX, inexpensive, and are typically replaced quite often. The e13 pedals do not have "replace often" pricing, thus I've never been interested in e13's pedal offerings.
    The e13's are aluminum, they only have composite outer plates, which are quite tough in mine and pinkbikes experiences. If they are damaged and need to be replaced, it's less than 30 bucks. Not a drop in the bucket I suppose, but definitely not expensive. If you have a chance to try some you wouldn't buy another pedal.

  31. #931
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drakche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Has anybody tried the Transition Stepdown pedals?
    Are they worth it?

  32. #932
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    I gave in to the canfield crampon ultimates. I will report with the reviews after a few rides.

  33. #933
    mtbr member
    Reputation: keepbalanced's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    I have crank bro's 50/50 and they I love them

  34. #934
    NWS
    NWS is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,443
    HT AE01s are now on ebay for about $100 shipped. I received mine a couple days ago, and they look very nice. I probably won't be riding again until April or May though, so I can't give them a proper review until then.

    Bi King 2013 HT AE01 MTB BMX Pedals Black 358G | eBay

  35. #935
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by drakche View Post
    Has anybody tried the Transition Stepdown pedals?
    Are they worth it?
    I've had a few sets of them. I used to ride them as a cheap pedal when I knew I was gonna thrash my pedals. They hold up really well in rocks but you pay for it in weight.

  36. #936
    Look at the time!
    Reputation: lelebebbel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,138
    Quote Originally Posted by keepbalanced View Post
    I have crank bro's 50/50 and they I love them
    One of the few pedals out there that manages to be expensive, heavy AND weak. Ask my friend, this one snapped on a small jump. He ate it pretty hard.


    Crankbrothers 50/50 by lelebebbel, on Flickr


    Quote Originally Posted by J. Random Psycho View Post
    Those QR pedals are mostly intended for folding bikes I think. Non-folding city bikes too can benefit: if you leave it U-locked in the street and take pedals with you, it's less attractive for thieves.
    Lack of pedals = easier to fit in the back of the thieves' van
    wanted: Cannondale Lefty w/ V-brake studs

  37. #937
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    264
    Wonder about any crank bros products. My friend swears by them, but breaks spokes all the time on the CB wheels. I've seen the Cronolog stuck in the all-the -way-up- unridable position on the trail (poor guy! we were miles from the trailhead) I hear they have great customer service though.
    As far as flats, I like my Ezra's. Two reasons : Light/Affordable

  38. #938
    mtbr member
    Reputation: katsooba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    416
    Canfield crampon ultimates
    best by far
    14' Canfield Jedi - The fast just got faster!
    15' Canfield Balance - The go to guy of the bike world!

  39. #939
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    I just got the ultimates and while they provide excellent grip they feel small compared to my vaults. I've only had one ride on them and hopefully they grow on me.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Platform Pedal Shootout, the best flat is...-imag0812.jpg  


  40. #940
    mtbr member
    Reputation: metrotuned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,770
    I want to review the Crampon pedals (either the classic and/or the Ultimate) for this Platform Pedal Shootout thread. I have a set of SAINT pedals to trade, even. Holler.
    Lead actor Will of the Sun, Author Platform Pedal Shootout 900K+ views

  41. #941
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,502
    Quote Originally Posted by illnacord View Post
    I want to review the Crampon pedals (either the classic and/or the Ultimate) for this Platform Pedal Shootout thread. I have a set of SAINT pedals to trade, even. Holler.
    You and me both, buddy!

  42. #942
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    I'll sell mine for the right $$$. Message me. I'm gonna keep my vaults.

    Can you do me a favor a measure the saints from pin to pin? Thanks!

  43. #943
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    94
    Does anyone have any info on when these Specialized flats will be available?

    Or have they become vaporware?


  44. #944
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ashas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    435
    have these been mentioned here?

    Syntace


    anyone has them? any info on them?
    thanx!

  45. #945
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drakche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by billysan View Post
    Does anyone have any info on when these Specialized flats will be available?

    Or have they become vaporware?

    This pedal is not for bikers with OCD.

    They will try to line up all the square pins.

  46. #946
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by drakche View Post
    This pedal is not for bikers with OCD.

    They will try to line up all the square pins.
    What is that black piece in the middle of that Speshy pedal?

    I like the amount of pin options on that NumberNine pedal, but the body shape with flared tips and lack of leading edge angle is not good for rock strikes. All pedals are going to take their share of strikes, but a shape like that is more likely to catch a rock rather than just take a blow and glance off it like these Spanks. Awesome All-Mountain pedals and still rock solid after numerous rock encounters. Only off the fun bike because a long XC ride over the weekend (yes time for new pins).

    Last edited by trojans1993; 12-27-2012 at 09:27 AM.

  47. #947
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    As I recall, first generation of Syntance Number Nine pedals had forged bodies. The one above looks machined (maybe post-forging machined). But I'm not a fan of that shape either.

    trojans1993,
    those pins look like they can handle some more (that is, I'd leave them be).
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  48. #948
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ashas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    435
    have to agree on the flanges and the leading edges on Syntace pedals - although that really doesn't have to be that big of a problem, really.
    still - below 290 g mark, even with this shape and so much pins is just incredible.

    three sizes and lightweight design tickled my imagination and am thinking what would they weight with the shape of.. let's say HT AE03's... Syntace has 15.4 mm in height and HT is only 11 mm, and HT's are 350 g. Syntace would than weight probably around lightest magnesium HT's which are around 220 g.

    hope Syntace will see things the way I am and start making pedals like that.

  49. #949
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Kronk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    805
    trojans 1993, that looks like a cover, or maybe even the retaining device for the end of the axle.
    It would be a way to keep the squeaking from happening, like some have found in other pedals.

    Anyone know?

  50. #950
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Kronk,
    this article may shed some light on it.

    The patent pending part is the needle bearing sleeve. Held in place by two pins (one from either side), it serves as both part of the pedalís platform and the outer body of the bearings. It holds two sets of needle bearings, and the spindle slides into it. This allows them to keep the platform thinner without compromising strength. The center section of the flats is just 10mm thick, ramping to about 15mm at the ends.


    Although I don't get the part about 2 sets of needle bearings..
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  51. #951
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Ah ha, thanks for that informative reply. That's definitely something I haven't seen before in a platform pedal. That's a pretty interesting way to keep the pedal thin and strong right there without having an exposed axle or axle nut. I'll have to hand it to Speshy for an inovative approach on that one, although I would like to see it in hand to take a closer look.

  52. #952
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by trojans1993 View Post
    although I would like to see it in hand to take a closer look.
    That, or a schematic.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  53. #953
    mtbr member
    Reputation: metrotuned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,770
    @ashas: As the OP of this thread, I will have a review of the Syntace NUMBERNINE platform pedals published here on MTBR in January 2013.
    Lead actor Will of the Sun, Author Platform Pedal Shootout 900K+ views

  54. #954
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ashas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by illnacord View Post
    @ashas: As the OP of this thread, I will have a review of the Syntace NUMBERNINE platform pedals published here on MTBR in January 2013.
    cool! looking forward to it.

  55. #955
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    60
    I've been on Candy Components pedals for about 1-2 years and love them. Looking forward to trying out the new crampon ultimates.

  56. #956
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    I'm thinking about switching from clipless to platform. I have downloaded and read most of the Flat Pedal Revolution Manifesto found here:

    The Flat Pedal Revolution Manifesto: How to Improve Your Riding With Flat Pedals | Mountain Bike Training Programs

    I'm considering this pedal/shoe combination that's at about my maximum budget.



    What do you think?

    Thanks,

    Hank

  57. #957
    Missouri sucks...
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,306
    I'd pass on the Impacts and get Freeriders. Impacts are pretty bulky and don't breathe well. They're heavy, overbuilt downhill shoes. The Freeriders are still fairly stout but much lighter and flexible. They both stick like glitter to a sweater so you won't be giving anything up in terms of grip. There's a sale on Freeriders for $50 at competitive cyclist.

  58. #958
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Thanks DFYFZX,

    I hear what you are saying and will look into Freeriders. I'm not hard core DH by any means but white is definitely off my list. What do you think about the Baron? (Not really into colors other than black, but my bike is red so it could work I guess.



    Hank

  59. #959
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ashas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    435
    I have Impact 2 Hi-Tops.
    yes, definitely bulky and overkill-y.

    it takes couple of rides to even realize where your feet are - but I love them. hi tops hug your ankle completely and it's even easier to pedal uphill because your feet are always straight. you really can not bend your feet in any direction other than straight.

    it can get a bit warm as well, of course, but when you're bombing down you don't feel that at all - you're trying to stay alive going at max speed as you can possibly get

    didn't try Freeriders, but I can definitely recommend Impact if you're willing to accept the shoe's terms and have very firm sole all the time.

  60. #960
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation: big0mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,906
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    What do you think about the Baron? (Not really into colors other than black, but my bike is red so it could work I guess.
    I've got a pair of purple Freeriders that are only about a year old so I don't need another but I couldn't pass up the $59 Red Baron's at Chainlove/Dept of Goods. I'll let 'em sit on a shelf until the purple pair wears out.

  61. #961
    Missouri sucks...
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,306
    Hank, don't know anything about the Baron but they look less "hardcore" than the Impacts to me. Maybe between the Freerider and Impact? For $60 I'd say they're definitely worth a try

  62. #962
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by big0mike View Post
    I've got a pair of purple Freeriders that are only about a year old so I don't need another but I couldn't pass up the $59 Red Baron's at Chainlove/Dept of Goods. I'll let 'em sit on a shelf until the purple pair wears out.
    Quote Originally Posted by DFYFZX View Post
    Hank, don't know anything about the Baron but they look less "hardcore" than the Impacts to me. Maybe between the Freerider and Impact? For $60 I'd say they're definitely worth a try
    Yea, I couldn't pass them up especially since I'm not sure about my transition from clipless to platforms. As long as I don't run into any gay bears I guess I'll be o,k. with red shoes.

    UPS says the shoes should be here Tuesday. Price Point is ten miles from my house. Both these pedals are $44.98 but I canít make up my mind. Iím leaning towards the B131ís but the 132ís look nice too. Iíd say 50 bucks is my price range and am open to suggestions especially based on personal experience.





    Thanks for helping,

    Hank

  63. #963
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Hey Hank, I think in that price range those both are pretty nice, but make sure you can replace those pins with something a little less shin friendly. I have not ridden either of these but from the pics it looks like they are kind of short and nubby rather than a real pin that will dig into your sole for real solid grip. Just a thought...

  64. #964
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    While they come with what appears to be a pin that looks like a capped hex-nut, I'm thinking it must be the same thread as pins that are really an allen head (or phillips head) set screw available in stainless steel of black steel at any hardware store that has a metric assortment. I kind of like that they are shin-friendly at this point.

    Thanks,

    Hank

  65. #965
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hoban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by trojans1993 View Post
    Hey Hank, I think in that price range those both are pretty nice, but make sure you can replace those pins with something a little less shin friendly. I have not ridden either of these but from the pics it looks like they are kind of short and nubby rather than a real pin that will dig into your sole for real solid grip. Just a thought...

    I agree. I recently got a pair of Blackspire Sub4 pedals to replace my Animals. The pins are not super short, but are wider and stainless/chrome and are not sticky on my hikers I use for riding (haven't bought sticky soles yet). The Animals I have are BMX pedals and will stick to hard plastic I bet.

    I brought them yesterday to a downhill/freeride park to try them out and was slipping off of them. Had to trade my buddy for his DMR V8s which have a combination of flat pins and screws. Much more sticky.

    However, he didn;t have a problem on the Blackspires with his 5.10 shoes. If you have sticky shoes those Wellgos won't be a problem.



    Blackspires versus my Animals.

  66. #966
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    While they come with what appears to be a pin that looks like a capped hex-nut, I'm thinking it must be the same thread as pins that are really an allen head (or phillips head) set screw available in stainless steel of black steel at any hardware store that has a metric assortment. I kind of like that they are shin-friendly at this point.

    Thanks,

    Hank
    Oddly enough,I think you will find nasty pins are actually better for shins because you rarely slip on pedals with taller sharper pins and proper shoes. My buddy just got some Sub 4s like Hoban's ^^ and they feel way sketchier than the Spanks or Crampons (talk about nasty pins...). I'm sure you a right with the set screw replacement on those so you should be fine.

  67. #967
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoban View Post
    I brought them yesterday to a downhill/freeride park to try them out and was slipping off of them.
    I'm curious. Not planning to do this in this lifetime, but when you see guys bombing down RedBull Rampage for the most part, are they riding clip-less or platforms?

    Here's a little something if you're bored:

    Red Bull Rampage Full Broadcast - Mountain Bike Reviews, News, Photo and Video

    On-again Off-again Rain today humm,

    Hank

  68. #968
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hoban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    I'm curious. Not planning to do this in this lifetime, but when you see guys bombing down RedBull Rampage for the most part, are they riding clip-less or platforms?
    Not sure what your post is for. Mine was comparing two platform pedals, nothing to do with clipless...

  69. #969
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation: big0mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,906
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    Yea, I couldn't pass them up especially since I'm not sure about my transition from clipless to platforms. As long as I don't run into any gay bears I guess I'll be o,k. with red shoes.
    Man, if you think red is gay you'd never make it with my crew. I get all kinds of hell about the purple shoes. Red will barely be noticed.

    Plus, if you do run into any gay bears they'll just wanna dance.

    If you do technical riding, up or down, I think you'll find.the transition a good one. Took me a couple weeks.to feel comfortable but I've got no reason to return.

    Sent from my Thunderbolt via Tapatalk...

  70. #970
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Well hahaha at least they are not Pink! There have been a couple of falls that I've wondered if I would have been able to fight had I not been clipped in.

    Hank

  71. #971
    Missouri sucks...
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,306
    Hank, I completely understand being on a budget. For $50, those pedals are both plenty nice, however, you won't get a true sense of what riding flats can actually be like unless you try some REALLY thin Spanks, Crampons, etc. The closer to the pedal axle you are, the better. I know we're talking millimeters here, but you can truly feel a big difference! My Sub4s used to try to rotate out from under my foot a few times a ride and I took a LOT more rock hits with them. Since I got the Crampon Ultimates, rock strikes are all but extinct and grip is just silly

    Again, since this is an experiment for you, I get the concept of a budget. Just be sure to keep in mind that a "proper" set of Crampons, or HT AE01 pedals would make a bigger difference than you think If you can spring an extra $40, these would be eye opening compared to the Wellgos: Bi King 2013 HT AE01 MTB BMX Pedals Black 358G TB16B | eBay

  72. #972
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    6,975
    Quote Originally Posted by DFYFZX View Post
    Hank, I completely understand being on a budget. For $50, those pedals are both plenty nice, however, you won't get a true sense of what riding flats can actually be like unless you try some REALLY thin Spanks, Crampons, etc. The closer to the pedal axle you are, the better. I know we're talking millimeters here, but you can truly feel a big difference! My Sub4s used to try to rotate out from under my foot a few times a ride and I took a LOT more rock hits with them. Since I got the Crampon Ultimates, rock strikes are all but extinct and grip is just silly

    Again, since this is an experiment for you, I get the concept of a budget. Just be sure to keep in mind that a "proper" set of Crampons, or HT AE01 pedals would make a bigger difference than you think If you can spring an extra $40, these would be eye opening compared to the Wellgos: Bi King 2013 HT AE01 MTB BMX Pedals Black 358G TB16B | eBay
    I would tend to agree with this. I recently tried to go back to flats. I went a little more money and bought the Shimano Saint pedals for $80. I found them wanting to roll under my feet also. Maybe that will go away as I get used to them- not sure. I'm wishing now that I had just gone all in with thinner pedals.

    Now I have a pair of $80 pedals and I'm not sure if it the pedals or running flats that I don't like, so to know for sure I'll have to give these more time and if it doesn't get better, but thinner pedals to know for sure.

    It would have been cheaper to buy the thin ones and if it didn't work sell them to recoup a good portion of the money.
    OG Ripley v2
    Carver 420 TI

  73. #973
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trojans1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    490
    Sounds to me like you're pretty sure you really want some higher end ultra thins. My advice is sell your saints before you ding them up and you will get a much better return. Pedals that look used don't tend to bring too much.

  74. #974
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pelagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    166
    My .02... Been on Saints for quite a few hours now on least aggressive setting (all pins installed w/ spacers) and Vans and have yet to slip or roll a pedal. Still go clipless for purely xc or cyclocross though. If you wanna flick your Saints...
    I live in my head...

    Just having fun... Sorry to piss you off...

  75. #975
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation: big0mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,906
    And to top off all the price issues I'd say it's better to go cheaper on pedals than shoes.

    I started my switch back to flats with a set of $50 HT somethings (decoy knockoffs) and a pair of $30 Fox shoes off Chainlove. They worked OK and I got used to flats again fairly quickly. Then started working on some bigger drops and couldn't keep my damn feet on the pedals. Sprung for my 510 Freeriders and couldn't believe the difference they made. Then I eventually got a pair of Spank Spikes and the ride is even better. Not as big a difference moving to the new pedals as the new shoes made, though.

  76. #976
    Missouri sucks...
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,306
    Definitely shoes > pedals, but high end pedals are definitely worth the price of admission. Another bonus to high end pedals is resale value and also being able to buy replacement parts. A $50 set of Wellgos is essentially a throw away pair since it will be nearly impossible to get wear parts when needed. A pair of high end pedals is not cheap to buy up front but you can buy rebuild kits for ~$20 so eventually they'll become a good investment if you use them long enough

  77. #977
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    71
    i just got to take my bike for a ride on some local trails with my new DMR vaults pedals. I also use the impact hi tops, the combination is amazing almost feels like my foot is glued to the pedals. once i can get out to highland ill be able to really use and put them to work but on local trails im pretty impressed.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  78. #978
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    ^ Take out the four pins in the middle for more grip.

  79. #979
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by slimphatty View Post
    ^ Take out the four pins in the middle for more grip.
    Jw how removing pins will increase grip? Wouldn't the pins add grip since the dig into the sole?

  80. #980
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoTone View Post
    I would tend to agree with this. I recently tried to go back to flats. I went a little more money and bought the Shimano Saint pedals for $80. I found them wanting to roll under my feet also. Maybe that will go away as I get used to them- not sure. I'm wishing now that I had just gone all in with thinner pedals. Now I have a pair of $80 pedals and I'm not sure if it the pedals or running flats that I don't like, so to know for sure I'll have to give these more time and if it doesn't get better, but thinner pedals to know for sure. It would have been cheaper to buy the thin ones and if it didn't work sell them to recoup a good portion of the money.
    Quote Originally Posted by big0mike View Post
    I started my switch back to flats with a set of $50 HT somethings (decoy knockoffs) and a pair of $30 Fox shoes off Chainlove. They worked OK and I got used to flats again fairly quickly. Then started working on some bigger drops and couldn't keep my damn feet on the pedals. Sprung for my 510 Freeriders and couldn't believe the difference they made. Then I eventually got a pair of Spank Spikes and the ride is even better. Not as big a difference moving to the new pedals as the new shoes made, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by DFYFZX View Post
    Definitely shoes > pedals, but high end pedals are definitely worth the price of admission. Another bonus to high end pedals is resale value and also being able to buy replacement parts. A $50 set of Wellgos is essentially a throw away pair since it will be nearly impossible to get wear parts when needed. A pair of high end pedals is not cheap to buy up front but you can buy rebuild kits for ~$20 so eventually they'll become a good investment if you use them long enough


    What you guys are saying makes total sense to me. I take real good care of my gear and like everyone else donít like doing things twice. Though they may get scuffed- up looking, at my level of riding these should last some years. I donít want to be wishing I went with thinner pedals, donít want to go the halfway route ($50 somethings) and I like the idea that the Spikes are re-buildable, so Iím sold.



    Sam Hillís Specialized Farewell Video | Mountain Bike Review


    Iíll have to pay more attention to see which riders are riding freefoot or trapped into their machines. Itís obvious platforms are Sam Hills choice


    Thanks for the advice guys and I'll get back to this thread after my first ride

    Hank

  81. #981
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,723
    One word of advice about the thin pedals is a lot of them utilize a single bearing on the spindle, with a one or a few DU bushings as well. Thicker pedals will generally use all bearings as opposed to the DU bushings, but this is how most pedals' achieve a thinner profile - DU bushings. The concern is that DU bushings wear faster and you may experience play on the spindle quicker. (My HT AE01's did this within a few hours of riding) Few thin pedal designs do use bearings throughout (Po1nt One's do)

    Just wanted to make you aware of this. If the DU bushings are user-serviceable not a big deal to just swap out for new ones as necessary, but if you have to send the pedals out for service, that could kinda suck.

  82. #982
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by bad andy View Post
    One word of advice about the thin pedals is a lot of them utilize a single bearing on the spindle, with a one or a few DU bushings as well. Thicker pedals will generally use all bearings as opposed to the DU bushings, but this is how most pedals' achieve a thinner profile - DU bushings. The concern is that DU bushings wear faster and you may experience play on the spindle quicker. (My HT AE01's did this within a few hours of riding) Few thin pedal designs do use bearings throughout (Po1nt One's do)

    Just wanted to make you aware of this. If the DU bushings are user-serviceable not a big deal to just swap out for new ones as necessary, but if you have to send the pedals out for service, that could kinda suck.
    Andy, thanks for the heads up.

    According to this link:
    Spank Spike Pedals - Mountain Bike Reviews, News, Photo and Video

    it appears that it is a simple enough rebuild that can easily be done by anyone that can turn a hex-key. The complete kit (including new spindles) is $40 which unless they got bent or made out of lead I could not see ever needing replacement. Although both the inboard and outboard bearings are sealed-type, there is an "IGUS" bushing (what is IGUS, what is "DU") used on the outboard bearing. I'm not sure Spike sells this by itself as I can see that this could be the part requiring regular replacement. (one season? two season?)





    SPIKE FLAT PEDAL
    *12mm Thin - Massive Platform
    *400g per pair
    *Cold Forged Alloy Pedal Body
    *Hollow Taper Scandium Enriched Steel Axle
    *Chamfered Leading Edges for Improved Clearance and Reduced Impact Forces
    *Chamfered Side Edges for Improved Cornering Clearance
    *Oversized Sealed Full Compliment Inboard Industrial Bearing
    *Sealed Outboard IGUS Bushing
    *20 Adjustable Pins per Pedal
    *Full Sized Hex Head Pins Improve Durability and Maintenence
    *Inboard Friction Seal Prevents Contamination and Reduces Unwanted Pedal Spin
    *Color: Zesty Orange / Ti-Grey / Black / Race Blue / Race Red

    Hank
    Last edited by DirtyHank; 01-07-2013 at 10:44 AM.

  83. #983
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    DirtyHank,

    because they undergo metal fatigue, it's a good idea to replace spindles once in a while even if they look intact. A spindle can also be bent, ground down with grit particles, or rusted.

    as for the IGUS vs DU difference, DU bushings are made of metal base with low-friction coating and are usually split and have cylindrical shape, whereas IGUS are full-polymer, not split and can have more complex (mushroom-like) shapes enabling them to carry some axial load.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  84. #984
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by hybridzeg8 View Post
    Jw how removing pins will increase grip? Wouldn't the pins add grip since the dig into the sole?
    It'll create a more concave platform so that the longer pins dig into your shoes more.

  85. #985
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    71

    Good job!

    ^^^ will try thanks for the suggestion

  86. #986
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation: big0mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,906
    You'll love the Spanks for sure.

    I got my Red Baron shoes the other day and at first inspection I'd say they are a tad beefier than my Freeriders. I can't wait until the Freeriders wear out so I can give the new kicks a spin.

  87. #987
    Five is right out
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,174
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Random Psycho View Post
    DirtyHank,

    because they undergo metal fatigue, it's a good idea to replace spindles once in a while even if they look intact. A spindle can also be bent, ground down with grit particles, or rusted.

    Maybe someone could bend a spindle through a big impact, but I doubt that fatigue is a big deal.

    Loads of riders have been riding multi-years on the same set of pedals (one of my sets is 8 years old). I know a fair number of people who have circumnavigated the globe on the same set of usually cheap pedals.

  88. #988
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by womble View Post
    Maybe someone could bend a spindle through a big impact, but I doubt that fatigue is a big deal.

    Loads of riders have been riding multi-years on the same set of pedals (one of my sets is 8 years old). I know a fair number of people who have circumnavigated the globe on the same set of usually cheap pedals.
    I should have mentioned that most cases of those axle failures that I pointed out (and that I had personal experience with) happened with modern thin pedals. The thinner the axle, the more significant are the effects of stress risers in it (from both shape and fluctuations in metal quality), and the more likey it is to fail from fatigue.

    With titanium axles this is even more pronounced, even if you're well within their staied weight limit.


    Edit: moreover, most of those cases happened on bikes where stand and mash is the dominant type of pedaling.
    Last edited by J. Random Psycho; 01-11-2013 at 11:56 AM.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  89. #989
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by big0mike View Post
    You'll love the Spanks for sure. I got my Red Baron shoes the other day and at first inspection I'd say they are a tad beefier than my Freeriders. I can't wait until the Freeriders wear out so I can give the new kicks a spin.
    I like them better than I thought I would. They are more of a brick red than how the internet depicts them as "fire engine" red. I've been wanting a pair of sneakers ever since High School and never found any I liked these are real comfortable. You should wear yours around the house to break them in a little.

    Hank

    P.S. My Spanks are out for delivery UPS. I think they got held up but the high winds we had here in California yesterday. Hope tomorrow is a good riding day (been raining a lot lately)

  90. #990
    mtbr member
    Reputation: keepbalanced's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    I have been wearing vans while riding for a long time, how do the red baron / other freeride shoes compare to vans? they look pretty similar to me. Rubber stickier maybe?

  91. #991
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Kronk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    805
    Quote Originally Posted by keepbalanced View Post
    I have been wearing vans while riding for a long time, how do the red baron / other freeride shoes compare to vans? they look pretty similar to me. Rubber stickier maybe?
    The 5.10 Impacts I have leave the Vans back in the '80s BMX memories.
    I was very surprised at the vast improvement the 5.10 shoes are over Vans.

  92. #992
    mtbr member
    Reputation: keepbalanced's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    What is different about them?

  93. #993
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by keepbalanced View Post
    What is different about them?
    Here ya go,

    For one, they have a great assortment!



    They've got sole!


    Probably the rubber compound and the pattern.


    Five Ten Red Baron Shoes (as of 1/12/2013)
    Competitive Cyclist $59.95
    Search - Competitive Cyclist

    Don't miss out!

    Hank

  94. #994
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,468
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    For one, they have a great assortment!
    Too bad they are all bulky and goofy looking as hell (same goes for Teva Links). I'm already hitting the chainstays sometimes with my size 12 Vans with run on the narrow side. I can't imagine riding with these joints. But I'm looking to try something new as I go through 2-3 pairs a season of Vans. The Point1 Podium just shred the waffle soles like no other. Grip is good, but the shoe could be stiffer a tad. Plus I'm so used to low cut shoes, well below the ankles like most Vans.

    The Shimano AM41 is somewhat passable to me in the looks department, I'm might try those this season.
    Last edited by eurospek; 01-12-2013 at 12:29 PM.
    konahonzo

  95. #995
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    My UPS Spanked me yesterday!

    and here they are!



    Hanky

  96. #996
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by eurospek View Post
    Too bad they are all bulky and goofy looking as hell (same goes for Teva Links). I'm already hitting the chainstays sometimes with my size 12 Vans with run on the narrow side. I can't imagine riding with these joints. But I'm looking to try something new as I go through 2-3 pairs a season of Vans. The Point1 Podium just shred the waffle soles like no other. Grip is good, but the shoe could be stiffer a tad. Plus I'm so used to low cut shoes, well below the ankles like most Vans.

    The Shimano AM41 is somewhat passable to me in the looks department, I'm might try those this season.
    I'm sure that's not all they got. I don't think my Red Barons are goofy looking but then again I may just be a goof.

    Hank

  97. #997
    beater
    Reputation: evasive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,049
    Quote Originally Posted by eurospek View Post
    Too bad they are all bulky and goofy looking as hell (same goes for Teva Links). I'm already hitting the chainstays sometimes with my size 12 Vans with run on the narrow side. I can't imagine riding with these joints. But I'm looking to try something new as I go through 2-3 pairs a season of Vans. The Point1 Podium just shred the waffle soles like no other. Grip is good, but the shoe could be stiffer a tad. Plus I'm so used to low cut shoes, well below the ankles like most Vans.

    The Shimano AM41 is somewhat passable to me in the looks department, I'm might try those this season.
    That is a pretty incredible attrition rate. This is what my Impacts look like after three seasons on Rallyes, Predators and Crampon Ultimates. They'll get replaced this year, but they've held up really well.

    Platform Pedal Shootout, the best flat is...-imageuploadedbytapatalk1358023594.561931.jpg

    You might consider Sombrio. Their shoes are uncharacteristically subdued looking, and are narrower than 5.10s. I bought a pair of Loams for cheap from Backcountry. Fit is pretty true to size.

  98. #998
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Wow, is there a secret to lengthening their service life? Mine look like that after a month riding NS Aerials.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

  99. #999
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,468
    Quote Originally Posted by evasive View Post
    That is a pretty incredible attrition rate. This is what my Impacts look like after three seasons on Rallyes, Predators and Crampon Ultimates. They'll get replaced this year, but they've held up really well.

    You might consider Sombrio. Their shoes are uncharacteristically subdued looking, and are narrower than 5.10s. I bought a pair of Loams for cheap from Backcountry. Fit is pretty true to size.
    Man, I wish I could snap a pic of my most recent Van Era/Authentics that I threw out not too long ago. That pair was literally missing chunks out of the gum waffle sole where it was shredded off by the long pins on the Podiums. Not worn away like your pic shows, I could literally poke the bottom of the insoles in that shoe with my finger.

    The grip is good when they are new, but once the pins eat a groove into the waffle sole, they quickly go downhill afterwards. Plus not the stiffest soles around, and luckily not too many rock strikes on my trails as hitting something hard kinda hurts with the canvas uppers. And I'm used to the fit of them as Vans Authentics are my go to shoe off the bike as well.

    This season I want to try something new: better grip, durability, stiffer soles, with a little more ankle protection as well (but they gotta look good, low key, and not bulky).

    I've been reading stellar reviews about the 5.10 soles, but like I said, I just can't commit myself to buying a pair. They already look bulky in regular sizes, I can only imagine them in my size, especially being used to narrower shoes.

    Ended up buying a pair of Shimano AM41 today from Backcountry for $60, been eying them for a while now (especially when they had a full spread of sizes for the same price lol) and only had a 46 in stock today, or super small 38-41. Hopefully they will fit me, size is equivalent to a US 11.5, if not they are going back and the search will continue.
    konahonzo

  100. #1000
    meow, meow.
    Reputation: J. Random Psycho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    eurospek,
    I'm experiencing the same wear patterns with my 5-10s. Bought a Shimano AM40 from the same reasoning (also wanted lace flaps), but they are now worn like that too. Straitline AMP stock pins done them in.

    I decided to go with less aggressive aluminum pins instead. So far so good, but it's been only below freezing rides for now, 5-10 soles get harder at these temperatures and there's no summer-like grip with any kind of pins.
    26" rigid SS 4130 BB7 nylon-flats ESI latex-tubes non-lubricated-8spd

Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 360

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •