Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 103

Thread: DVO Suspension

  1. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ianjenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,184
    Interested to try one hope it handles the chop as well as the dorado and has its same reliability.

  2. #52
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by ianjenn View Post
    Interested to try one hope it handles the chop as well as the dorado and has its same reliability.
    I've heard the chasis on the DVO is stronger and stiffer, more material all over. Additionally I think they are using essentially the same seals. So chassis reliability should be as good or better all around.

  3. #53
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini2k05 View Post
    I've heard the chasis on the DVO is stronger and stiffer, more material all over. Additionally I think they are using essentially the same seals. So chassis reliability should be as good or better all around.
    I am not 100% but I would say the stanctions are bigger then the dorado
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  4. #54
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by SHIVER ME TIMBERS View Post
    I am not 100% but I would say the stanctions are bigger then the dorado
    Possibly, but that's not what I had in mine. things like taper on the upper legs, wall thicknesses, bushing overlap, etc. Those are all gonna be a bit bigger on the DVO than the Dorado I believe.

  5. #55
    GAME ON!
    Reputation: saturnine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,968
    i would've liked to see the gap between the two arches filled in so it acts as a built in fender. wouldn't add much weight and could prove to be pretty useful. and if not done to all, then at least done as an option.
    RIP Adam Yauch

    "M.C. for what I AM and do, the A is for Adam and the lyrics; true"

  6. #56
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by saturnine View Post
    i would've liked to see the gap between the two arches filled in so it acts as a built in fender. wouldn't add much weight and could prove to be pretty useful. and if not done to all, then at least done as an option.
    I will pass that on
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  7. #57
    DenverDH'er
    Reputation: rep_1969's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,149
    Yeah, that would probably also make the brace even stronger, and easier to manufacture. I'd also hope they make an natural silver option as well as the green and black.

  8. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    991
    the silver would be a good addition to the green and black. in a perfect world, they would offer custom color anodizing on the silver cnc'd parts. decals to match whatever color combo you choose.

  9. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BigHit-Maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    687
    I cannot wait to see what they wind up coming out with in the 180mm Single Crown category eventually.

    More forks need to be PLUSH. Fox's feel so full of stiction it's ridiculous.
    You in Oklahoma City? If yes, come ride with us.

  10. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    is that the brake hose guide? pretty trick.....

  11. #61
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by raman503 View Post
    is that the brake hose guide? pretty trick.....
    nah...that hasn't been addressed on first forks...they are trying them out to see where it is best for brake line
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  12. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    142
    I cannot wait to see what they wind up coming out with in the 180mm Single Crown category eventually.
    agreed! with the zoke 66 not available in the future I'm hoping they fill that segment. Not sure if USD design is the ticket for a 7 inch single crown...

  13. #63
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumpcaser View Post
    agreed! with the zoke 66 not available in the future I'm hoping they fill that segment. Not sure if USD design is the ticket for a 7 inch single crown...
    wait to Sea Otter ....
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  14. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    991
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHit-Maniac View Post
    I cannot wait to see what they wind up coming out with in the 180mm Single Crown category eventually.

    More forks need to be PLUSH. Fox's feel so full of stiction it's ridiculous.
    My 40 has very little stiction, if you keep your foam rings soaked in oil and pack the void with slick honey, and have the new skf seals, it's a drastic improvement.

  15. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BigHit-Maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    687
    Quote Originally Posted by csermonet View Post
    My 40 has very little stiction, if you keep your foam rings soaked in oil and pack the void with slick honey, and have the new skf seals, it's a drastic improvement.
    Ride a Fox fork in a desert environment for any length of time, and you'll know what I mean. LOL.

    The Zochi I had on my Versus that I just sold not too long ago was the plushest thing ever. My Fox on my Specialized has been rebuilt twice, and still feels like a sticky pile of poop after only a few months on a fresh rebuild. (32 Float on my XC bike).

    Short travel or long travel, Fox's never feel as plush and small bump compliant as older Zochi's. Never have, and probably never will. I had an old 888 on my Demo and that was leaps and bounds more plush than my Fox is.
    You in Oklahoma City? If yes, come ride with us.

  16. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    991
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHit-Maniac View Post
    Ride a Fox fork in a desert environment for any length of time, and you'll know what I mean. LOL.

    The Zochi I had on my Versus that I just sold not too long ago was the plushest thing ever. My Fox on my Specialized has been rebuilt twice, and still feels like a sticky pile of poop after only a few months on a fresh rebuild. (32 Float on my XC bike).

    Short travel or long travel, Fox's never feel as plush and small bump compliant as older Zochi's. Never have, and probably never will. I had an old 888 on my Demo and that was leaps and bounds more plush than my Fox is.
    No experience on older marz, I hear that's really the best stuff made though. My 40 is the best performing fork I've felt, that's all relative though as everyone's suspension tastes are very individual. I've ridden old boxxers, new boxxers, and an 08 888 rc3. The marz was my least favorite, then new boxxer, then old, with the 40 being my favorite. During the summer our trails get pretty dusty so doing oil changes more often than recommended is a must no matter what you run. As long as i stay on top of it I never notice any stiction issues.

  17. #67
    Slap happy crappiness
    Reputation: DHgnaR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,090
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHit-Maniac View Post
    Ride a Fox fork in a desert environment for any length of time, and you'll know what I mean. LOL.

    The Zochi I had on my Versus that I just sold not too long ago was the plushest thing ever. My Fox on my Specialized has been rebuilt twice, and still feels like a sticky pile of poop after only a few months on a fresh rebuild. (32 Float on my XC bike).

    Short travel or long travel, Fox's never feel as plush and small bump compliant as older Zochi's. Never have, and probably never will. I had an old 888 on my Demo and that was leaps and bounds more plush than my Fox is.
    It rains like 10 days a YEAR where I live, the definition of a desert, and my 40 feels amazing, as do most of the other Fox's with the SKF seals. Who's rebuilding your fork?
    FWIW, one 40 I worked on always had stiction, no matter what. It was the only Fox I'd ever felt with that though and I lay my hands on a lot of Fox forks (at least 4 or 5 a day). My 40 already has less stiction than that one and it's only been ridden about an hour or so. So maybe you're experiencing some weird binding issues with either the bushings or your mechanic isn't properly lubing the seals, etc...
    Either way, your Fox shouldn't be feeling like a "sticky pile of poop."
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  18. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: G-AIR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,498
    Coil vs. Air
    The air forks are never going to be as plush as coil, especially on the initial compression.

    Regardless, I agree, Fox has a lot of room for improvement if they want to be the best.

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHit-Maniac View Post
    Ride a Fox fork in a desert environment for any length of time, and you'll know what I mean. LOL.

    The Zochi I had on my Versus that I just sold not too long ago was the plushest thing ever. My Fox on my Specialized has been rebuilt twice, and still feels like a sticky pile of poop after only a few months on a fresh rebuild. (32 Float on my XC bike).

    Short travel or long travel, Fox's never feel as plush and small bump compliant as older Zochi's. Never have, and probably never will. I had an old 888 on my Demo and that was leaps and bounds more plush than my Fox is.

  19. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHit-Maniac View Post
    Ride a Fox fork in a desert environment for any length of time, and you'll know what I mean. LOL.

    The Zochi I had on my Versus that I just sold not too long ago was the plushest thing ever. My Fox on my Specialized has been rebuilt twice, and still feels like a sticky pile of poop after only a few months on a fresh rebuild. (32 Float on my XC bike).

    Short travel or long travel, Fox's never feel as plush and small bump compliant as older Zochi's. Never have, and probably never will. I had an old 888 on my Demo and that was leaps and bounds more plush than my Fox is.
    you know that silver, metal spring/ring on the outside of the fork wipers? there is also one on the inside of the wiper. removing the internal spring/ring will improve the feel of your fork and reduce stiction substantially. on the downside service intervals are increased as the seal is not as effective at keeping out debris, but since Fox recommends weekly service it's no big deal. give it a try.

  20. #70
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by raman503 View Post
    you know that silver, metal spring/ring on the outside of the fork wipers? there is also one on the inside of the wiper. removing the internal spring/ring will improve the feel of your fork and reduce stiction substantially. on the downside service intervals are increased as the seal is not as effective at keeping out debris, but since Fox recommends weekly service it's no big deal. give it a try.
    another advantage of an inverted fork
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  21. #71
    Slap happy crappiness
    Reputation: DHgnaR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,090
    Quote Originally Posted by SHIVER ME TIMBERS View Post
    another advantage of an inverted fork
    How is a sarcastic remark about Fox's service intervals an advantage for all inverted forks?
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  22. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by raman503 View Post
    but since Fox recommends weekly service it's no big deal. give it a try.
    Fox have never recommended weekly service, nor would they....where do you get you're info from? It's certainly not from fox.

  23. #73
    Pro Crastinator
    Reputation: .WestCoastHucker.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by DHgnaR View Post
    How is a sarcastic remark about Fox's service intervals an advantage for all inverted forks?
    so, you point out his flaw in this post, but you let the other 41,000 slide by?
    Last edited by .WestCoastHucker.; 01-04-2013 at 09:00 AM. Reason: needed to add another zero to that number...


  24. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Fox have never recommended weekly service, nor would they....where do you get you're info from? It's certainly not from fox.
    it's true, i was being sarcastic or exagerating, which didn't escape everybody, but to be honest i'm not that far off: change oil in lowers and inspect bushings "every 30 hours". so service your fork every 2 weeks and service your damper "every 100 hours" or every 6 weeks. I believe i read at one point that Fox recommends these services are done more frequently if you live in a crappy environment, such as Oregon, where i live. so, yeah, Fox recommends i service my fork every 1-2 weeks. with that being said, Fox makes a terrific product.

    i'm don't comment enough to include a link, but if you go to ridefox dot com, click service/bike and scroll down, you too will see their recommended service intervals.

  25. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by raman503 View Post
    it's true, i was being sarcastic or exagerating, which didn't escape everybody, but to be honest i'm not that far off: change oil in lowers and inspect bushings "every 30 hours". so service your fork every 2 weeks and service your damper "every 100 hours" or every 6 weeks. I believe i read at one point that Fox recommends these services are done more frequently if you live in a crappy environment, such as Oregon, where i live. so, yeah, Fox recommends i service my fork every 1-2 weeks. with that being said, Fox makes a terrific product.

    i'm don't comment enough to include a link, but if you go to ridefox dot com, click service/bike and scroll down, you too will see their recommended service intervals.
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.
    Last edited by SV11; 01-03-2013 at 03:20 PM.

  26. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Fox have never recommended weekly service, nor would they....where do you get you're info from? It's certainly not from fox.
    I did, however, find this quote on the Fox sevice website: Tip: If you tend to ride in extreme conditions frequently (dry and dusty, wet and muddy, downhill racing, winter riding, etc.), correspondingly the service procedure items should be done more frequently.

    I certainly got my information from Fox......

  27. #77
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.
    Either you don't ever ride your 40, or it must feel like absolute poop. I'll bet you $1 BILLION on that.

  28. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini2k05 View Post
    Either you don't ever ride your 40, or it must feel like absolute poop. I'll bet you $1 BILLION on that.
    Wrong on both accounts, I'm just seeing how far I can push it. Pushing the service interval to infinity is nothing new for me, like i said i did the same with my 888s, my WB DH3's, RS Psylo SL.. I don't want a fork that needs to be babied.

  29. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.
    shoot SV11, i'm not here to argue but if you are "aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing" why did you act like i was crazy when i commented with a slight
    exaggeration regarding said service intervals? Also, if you are aware of there service recommendations why would you ignore them? thats a pretty high dollar item you have there.
    if you think your fork is "like butter" then i would contend that we have different ideas of 'butter'.
    Finally, if you have not serviced your 40 in 6 years then the oil in the lowers is now mud (fact), your wipers are completely dried out (fact) and the finish on your stanchions is very likely worn (not fact, but likely). it's either that or you don't ride frequently, which i doubt. Maintenance is not just about performance but reliability and longevity too. not to mention resale.

  30. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    234
    I'm betting on Ti springs (2 of em) twin tube independent HS/LS dampening, and an improved version of ETA mechanical travel adjust to drop it down for climbs.


    Mmmmmmmm. I built an rc3 ETA 55 Ti before, and I have a feeling they're gonna knock it out of the park.

    What I REALLY want to see is what they come up with for an air shock. Their Jade should be pretty damn awesome, but there are good coil shocks on the market now, with plenty of custom options.

    The air shock equiv. of the Jade would be all time lust for me.

  31. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    raman503, mainly to see how realiable they are when pushed beyond the service guidelines. The lowers could use a clean, im guessing the oil is pretty rancid. The wipers suprisingly aren't dry...yet. In fact, it's the only part of the fork I'm anal about, the wipers. The forks stanchions have no wear marks, im not surprised due to the condition of the wipers. I've used the forks 2-3 times a wk, except for the last 4-5 months where the bike has been out of action.
    I think it's time we got back to the thread at hand.
    Aplogies to the OP for going OT.

  32. #82
    What?
    Reputation: mullen119's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.
    I yelled at my computer when I read this^

  33. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by mullen119 View Post
    I yelled at my computer when I read this^
    Not for the faint hearted.

    Now I gotta get myself an Emerald to abuse, with heavier springs.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Last edited by SV11; 01-03-2013 at 04:38 PM.

  34. #84
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by DHgnaR View Post
    How is a sarcastic remark about Fox's service intervals an advantage for all inverted forks?
    inverted forks don't have seals where the dirt just sits on them...gravity naturally helps keep them clean
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  35. #85
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,732
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.
    no service in 6 years??? pretty weird...because every fork I have changed the oil on felt bran new but plusher
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  36. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by SHIVER ME TIMBERS View Post
    no service in 6 years??? pretty weird...because every fork I have changed the oil on felt bran new but plusher
    Yeah, I haven't gone this long without a service for any fork, it's not something I would repeat or recommend. The service for the 888 made no real difference, im guessing I had the wrong spring in it and heavier wt oil, and the fork was plush as is before and after the service.

    I will get the 40 serviced soon, I proved to myself what I needed to, so no point doing damage that's irreparable.

    Bring on the Emerald, in silver.

  37. #87
    Slap happy crappiness
    Reputation: DHgnaR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,090
    Quote Originally Posted by .WestCoastHucker. View Post
    so, you point out his flaw in this post, but you let the other 41,00 slide by?
    Slide by? Nah, I just ridicule him in person.

    Quote Originally Posted by raman503 View Post
    it's true, i was being sarcastic or exagerating, which didn't escape everybody, but to be honest i'm not that far off: change oil in lowers and inspect bushings "every 30 hours". so service your fork every 2 weeks and service your damper "every 100 hours" or every 6 weeks. I believe i read at one point that Fox recommends these services are done more frequently if you live in a crappy environment, such as Oregon, where i live. so, yeah, Fox recommends i service my fork every 1-2 weeks. with that being said, Fox makes a terrific product.

    i'm don't comment enough to include a link, but if you go to ridefox dot com, click service/bike and scroll down, you too will see their recommended service intervals.
    You have 15 hours of actual ride time a week? Holy shlt that's a lot! That means, if we were to assume you a do 5 min run every run, that every 12 runs you do would be 1 hour of riding, so if you really ride 15 hours a week, that means you're doing 180 runs a week!!! Damn I wish I had your life!
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  38. #88
    Pro Crastinator
    Reputation: .WestCoastHucker.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,649
    some of us ride trails that are significantly longer than 5 minutes...

    still plenty of actual saddle time though. my guess is that he is calculating the entire time he is out and about...


  39. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by DHgnaR View Post
    Slide by? Nah, I just ridicule him in person.



    You have 15 hours of actual ride time a week? Holy shlt that's a lot! That means, if we were to assume you a do 5 min run every run, that every 12 runs you do would be 1 hour of riding, so if you really ride 15 hours a week, that means you're doing 180 runs a week!!! Damn I wish I had your life!
    I don't necessarily do 'runs' as much as i do hours. I get on my bike and ride it up and over and around and down and probably again and 4-5 hours later i'm done riding. I only ride lifts a few times a year when i'm in whistler or winter park or park city and if i do shuttle runs its generally after the aforementioned ride. so i don't get in 180 runs a week, but i do spend significant time in the saddle.

  40. #90
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Wrong on both accounts, I'm just seeing how far I can push it. Pushing the service interval to infinity is nothing new for me, like i said i did the same with my 888s, my WB DH3's, RS Psylo SL.. I don't want a fork that needs to be babied.
    Then they are not getting rebuilt right. Even best case scenario for the 888, the grease on the oil seals will dry up after a year, maximum, if you are actually riding it. There is no question about that. And that makes a BIG difference in feel. So either

    A. No new grease was applied so it still feels like poop, or sh*tty grease was applied
    B. There was never any grease, and still no grease so it always did and still feels like poop
    C. It was never ridden, probably unlikely
    D. You can't tell the difference, which is REALLY unlikely, even the greenest bigger can feel the difference

    Not to mention that the oil just breaks down, starts getting all foamy, gets dirty, etc. Yes even in a 888 in socal the oil will get dirty. Even if you just replace that it makes a difference in the damping.


    Don't even get me started on the fox stuff. Those forks didn't even use to have oil seals. Dirt gets in there and negatively impacts the lubrication oil. Those dampers are sealed so the damping might stay more consistent. But no way that you aren't having to replace the damper condom once in a while if it is actually being ridden

  41. #91
    Living the High Life
    Reputation: Ithnu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,535
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini2k05 View Post
    Either you don't ever ride your 40, or it must feel like absolute poop. I'll bet you $1 BILLION on that.
    Must spread rep...
    You have just been mentally Rick Roll'd. Yup you're thinking about it right now aren't you? Don't fight it.

  42. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini2k05 View Post
    Then they are not getting rebuilt right. Even best case scenario for the 888, the grease on the oil seals will dry up after a year, maximum, if you are actually riding it. There is no question about that. And that makes a BIG difference in feel. So either

    A. No new grease was applied so it still feels like poop, or sh*tty grease was applied
    B. There was never any grease, and still no grease so it always did and still feels like poop
    C. It was never ridden, probably unlikely
    D. You can't tell the difference, which is REALLY unlikely, even the greenest bigger can feel the difference

    Not to mention that the oil just breaks down, starts getting all foamy, gets dirty, etc. Yes even in a 888 in socal the oil will get dirty. Even if you just replace that it makes a difference in the damping.


    Don't even get me started on the fox stuff. Those forks didn't even use to have oil seals. Dirt gets in there and negatively impacts the lubrication oil. Those dampers are sealed so the damping might stay more consistent. But no way that you aren't having to replace the damper condom once in a while if it is actually being ridden
    Dude, you are wrong on a lot of accounts.
    A....New grease was used, I was the one who serviced the 888
    B I never said the fork felt like poop, you did...the fork was plush before and after the service, its just that the service made no huge difference because i used heavier wt oil and spring, I have mentioned it before.
    C Come on, it was used regularly, 3 times a week minimum.
    D, like i said, there was no huge diff after the service

    Don't get me started, I have no thing to lie about. The fox was purchased in 2006, todate it has not had a service. I understand you have a hard time believing that forks can go for yonks without service, providing you keep up with the maintenance. As I said before, this isn't the first time I haven't serviced a particular fork in years.

  43. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    403
    Do you guys think twisting will be an issue with this fork??
    That factor and weight is what turned most people off of the Avalanche fork
    By twisting I mean when you crash..you have to loosen the crowns and align averything back up..

    I do understand when people gripe about that if you're a hardcore DH'er..
    For me, I just freeride, and weight doesn't bother me at all(my bike weighs 51lbs)
    but, if you're looking for the most durable fork(or shock for that matter) then you'd be hard pressed to find anything better than the avalanche

    my entire group ride Avy forks and shocks and I can honestly tell you NONE of us has even had any problems at all ,not even a seal leak, in the past 10 years
    we ride hard too


    so does the brace thing prevent twisting during crashes?? or does it just make the fork stiffer??
    oh, i'm also not sold on the air fork yet..I know they have come along way, but for now i'm sticking with my buttery smooth Avalanche coil....

    Last edited by _rich_; 01-05-2013 at 10:27 AM.

  44. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by _rich_ View Post
    Do you guys think twisting will be an issue with this fork??
    That factor and weight is what turned most people off of the Avalanche fork
    By twisting I mean when you crash..you have to loosen the crowns and align averything back up.
    Yes it will be an issue, as it is with inverted forks. I don't see anything in the form of a fork brace, the cf arch is meant to reduce flex.
    Installing a fork brace will reduce fork twist about 70% making the stock forks about 80% as efficient as inverted forks in reducing fork twist but, retaining the front to back flex.

  45. #95
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Yes it will be an issue, as it is with inverted forks. I don't see anything in the form of a fork brace, the cf arch is meant to reduce flex.
    Installing a fork brace will reduce fork twist about 70% making the stock forks about 80% as efficient as inverted forks in reducing fork twist but, retaining the front to back flex.
    w..t..f..?

  46. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini2k05 View Post
    w..t..f..?
    Fork Twist...go do some research

  47. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: General Mayhem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Yes it will be an issue, as it is with inverted forks. I don't see anything in the form of a fork brace, the cf arch is meant to reduce flex.
    Installing a fork brace will reduce fork twist about 70% making the stock forks about 80% as efficient as inverted forks in reducing fork twist but, retaining the front to back flex.
    Wow.....just wow.....I'm 67.5% more educated about inverted forks now.....

  48. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: shwinn8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    I"m aware of Fox's guidelines for servicing.
    Do you own a pair of 40's?
    I do, I haven't serviced them in 6 yrs. It's working brilliant, no issues, it's still like buttter which I"m pretty amazed at, no slop in bushings, structually stiff. I want it to deteriorate so I can get it checked out, but it's still going strong since day one. The seals are in very good condition, I think looking after my gear is paying off massively.

    I also owned a pair of 888s, which didn't see a service for 3-4 years. When I finally broke down and serviced it, it made no difference whatsoever on how the fork rode.

    3-4 years... 6 years.. DAMN! and how often do you change the oil in your vehicle?
    '11 Jedi
    '01 Rocket 88 Stage3
    '00 Homegrown

  49. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: shwinn8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by SHIVER ME TIMBERS View Post
    inverted forks don't have seals where the dirt just sits on them...gravity naturally helps keep them clean
    pretty cool. I never thought of it that way
    '11 Jedi
    '01 Rocket 88 Stage3
    '00 Homegrown

  50. #100
    Professional Troll
    Reputation: Gemini2k05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by SV11 View Post
    Fork Twist...go do some research
    Trust me, I understand the individual words and terms you used, but no one can comprehend the "sentences" you put them into.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •