Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 173
  1. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    rickcin, have you thought about what tires you were going to upgrade to? The stock wheels "technically" won't allow anything bigger, although I've heard people say they have ran 35c tires on 15mm inner wheels. My primary concern is puncture resistance, especially with tires this small. Very few if any offroad knobbies offer the level of protection the stock tires or the Schwalbes I mentioned.

    I think the solution is to get a second wheel set like lunna is doing. I wouldn't be nearly concerned with flats/rim damage with something like 38c-45c tires. I'd love to have two sets of wheels/tires to switch back and forth depending on conditions.

    One thing about this bike is it doesn't have quick release wheels. I don't know whether that's something I need or not. Thoughts?
    I would rather not have another set of wheels, especially since I have a FS bike. I would much rather have cyclocross tires for the trails that are part pavement and part dirt or stone dust. Also, a different tire will add to the suspension of the bike and provide a better ride.

    I like;
    Clement MSO CX
    Vittoria CrossXG
    Continental Ciclo X King

    However my favorite is the Bontrager CX 3 which is hard case and has 120tpi

    The wheels do not have the quick release feature???? If not, I wonder why and hope that a member could explain why, there must be a logical reason!!

    Rick

  2. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Evidently there may some issues with the strength of the quick release and disc brakes??? If its a matter of strength or just Trek being overkill safety wise I'm okay with it. Honestly the arrangement Trek has on this bike looks really easy, all i need is an allen wrench.

    check these links

    Broken Fork

    Disk brake and Quick Release problem

    Brandon

  3. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    Evidently there may some issues with the strength of the quick release and disc brakes??? If its a matter of strength or just Trek being overkill safety wise I'm okay with it. Honestly the arrangement Trek has on this bike looks really easy, all i need is an allen wrench.

    check these links

    Broken Fork

    Disk brake and Quick Release problem

    Brandon
    Wow, this is crazy, I never knew such a problem existed!! Now you have me really thing about my FS Trek Superfly which has great stopping power, I guess perhaps too good!

    So I guess the bottom line is to easy on the brakes, when possible and make sure the skewers are tight? I gotta believe the mountain bike I ride is made tougher and meant to be ridded harder than I will ever do.

    I was never a fan of rim brakes and have always liked discs and this is one reason I favor the Trek Cross Rip over other Cyclocross bikes.

  4. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    I couldn't be happier with the brakes, they stop extremely well. It almost feels like a motorcycle to me but without any front end dive under hard braking. The biggest differences I've noticed is the consistency and zero fade. Next would be the silence in all conditions, ie no squeaking or pulsing when wet.

    To me, this is a tough ass road bike with a carbon fork that I can treat it like the urban brawler type bikes im used to riding. I've ridden this bike at work with it's gravel roads with rock the size of small boulders and puddles 8" deep. I road it in the city dodging traffic and the brakes stopped my 210lb with authority to avoid a car turning right into an intersection I was going to cross.

    As tough as this bike is one of the things I've been most impressed with is how fast and effortlessly this bike rolls. It does not pedal much harder than the Domane 2.0 I rode. I have NEVER covered ground on a bicycle like this. It's still light and doesn't work the crap out of you!

    I know I've seen monstercross/cyclocross bike on here with discs and skewers. Maybe with the carbon fork Trek felt like a solid axle would be beneficial?.?.?

  5. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I am sure I will love the bike and certain that Trek has designed it properly so there will not be any issues with the bike.

    How do you like the tires when off road? My thought was to ask the bike shop to change out the tires rather than to start riding with the stock tires. What are you thoughts on this?

  6. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    My opinion? Ride it. Enjoy it and wear them out.

    I have not once felt like I need a more aggressive tread or lacked traction anywhere. The only issue ive ran into is when I really get into the soft stuff the front tire washes out. In my limited experience tread pattern wont do squat for this, the real cure is bigger tires. The only trouble with that is the wheels will only support 32mm tires.

    My only concern is that bigger wheels/tires may weight this bike down and numb the handling a bit. Thats why I think biding your(our) time and getting a spare set of wheels to try out tires is a smart move. Big puncture resistant tires are heavy, there are much lighter tires but will they be any more puncture resistant than the one that are on it???

  7. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    These are the tires that come on the bike( the ultimate version in 32c.)


    Bontrager: H5 700C (Model #09390)

  8. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Yes, I looked at them many times, on line and I guess they will be okay. I just thought a mini knobby like the Clement that comes standard on the GT Cyclocross. Just thought it might be better for the dirt and stone dust trails, just a little more bite on soft material, but that is just my thinking.

    I Think I am going with your recommendation, just take what comes with the bike and wear them out and have a blast.

    Thanks - Rick

  9. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by the mayor View Post
    Both take "29" wheels....a 29 wheel is the same as a 700 road wheel.
    I don't " like" either of them...as in they are pretty much the same bikes...pretty good lower priced, commuter/ path bikes.
    Either will be fine for what you want to do with it.
    Don't over think it. You obviously like it...buy it and ride it.
    Just out of curiosity, what Cross bike do you like?

  10. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    I picked up the bike today and couldn't be happier. After riding both the 54 and 50 I chose the 50 Elite. The smaller frame just felt more nimble and stable under low speed conditions and didnt seem to give up any stability at speed.

    The Elite is a step up from the standard CrossRip in every way. I could tell very little difference between the new Sora components and the Tiagra on the Domane I test road previously. The Hayes brakes are very smooth and stopped every bit as good or better than the BB5 brakes on the standard model.

    The only negative I can think of so far is the seat is hard and hurts my pelvis a bit. Might havde to change the seat.
    BTW, when you start looking at new saddles, if you haven't bought one already, check out the WTB saddles. Many riders love them and it comes standard on the Salsa, Fargo 2.

  11. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by rickcin View Post
    BTW, when you start looking at new saddles, if you haven't bought one already, check out the WTB saddles. Many riders love them and it comes standard on the Salsa, Fargo 2.
    Thanks, I ended up buying a Serfas Mx-2 Dorado from my LBS. I get a discount on items for a certain period of time after buying the bike from them. So far the seat seems to be a major improvement. It's a performance comfort seat and is a bit wider than the stocker. I spent some more time nailing the seat position and feel like I finally nailed it after tilting the nose of the seat down a bit. The seat does have more cushion but it's not overly padded for those longer rides.

    So far I have put about 60 miles or so on the bike. The only things I've had to do is adjust the rear derailleur six clicks out and the front/rear brakes three clicks out each. At the end of the month I'll take it in for an adjustment/service.

    I ended up buying a well taken care of 93 Trek MultiTrack hybrid for 140 locally. The frame specs (all black steel) are nearly identical to the CrossRip and has 35c tires on it already. My plans are to switch to drop bars and modern controls. I may put a carbon fork and discs on the front. I'm trying to assemble a fleet of decent bikes for the entire family to ride, no point in having a bunch of crap bikes no one wants to ride!

  12. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I will take a look at the saddle your LBS sold you. I do usually end up changing the stock saddle that comes with the bike to better match up with my specific use of that bike.

    I did not order the bike yet, however I bought new shimano clipless pedals that I plan on having on the Trek. I love being clipped in, you become more of a part of the bike and have better control. Like driving a sports car with an automatic transmission, it would be a total waste, at least as far as I am concerned!

  13. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Real cars have three pedals!

    You've got me looking at pedals/shoes now. I'm looking at something like these:

    Shimano PD M530 SLX Trail Clipless Pedal > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

    OR these:

    Shimano XTR M985 Trail Pedal > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

    What do you think?

    What about shoes, any reccomendations??

  14. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    That is too funny!!!! Your first ling are the new pedals I bought for the Cross Rip that I have not ordered yet!

    The reason I bought these is because I have the Shimnao PD-M647 pedals on my mountain bike and they are virtually the same ones as the PD M530, same mechanism just a slightly smaller surround.

    I love those pedals, they are so great, go with them and let me know how you do. Just make sure to practice will you will fall and not get hurt. I rode around on our lawn and I still fell a few times when out riding on a trail. I am totally hooked on being clipped in.

    Keep me posted!!

  15. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    Real cars have three pedals!

    You've got me looking at pedals/shoes now. I'm looking at something like these:

    Shimano PD M530 SLX Trail Clipless Pedal > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

    OR these:

    Shimano XTR M985 Trail Pedal > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

    What do you think?

    What about shoes, any reccomendations??
    What interests you in those two pedals? I see they are basically the same thing, a standard SPD with a half cage around them. In my opinion, the half cage is useless. It adds weight, and provides no benefit. It isnt large enough to use as a platform. I think you need to go extreme one way or the other.
    Ride what the pros use:
    Shimano XTR PD-M980 Race Pedal > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

    or go full on cage:
    Shimano PD-M545 Pedals > Components > Pedals, Cleats, Toe Clips, Straps > Pedals | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop
    Hammerheadbikes.com

  16. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    The full cage is what I have on my FS bike and it does offer full support as well as being able to pedal without being clipped in for those difficult times on single track.

    Shimano claims the reduced cage on the PD M-530 is for mud shedding while they claim it still offers support and some stability. You would also be able to make a short trip without having cleats on.

    The PD 530' weigh 455 grams

    The XTR M-987 weigh 398 grams and are $100 more than the 530's. For a CX bike, the weight difference is not a factor, at least in my opinion.
    Last edited by rickcin; 01-09-2013 at 05:44 AM.

  17. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    The fact that I'm a total noob and never used clipless pedals is what interests me in these.

    I don't want a race version to be my first foray into the clipless pedal world and I don't want 2lb bricks for pedals on this bike either.

    Any good options for cleats in wide widths? Only ones I see are Shimano and they are $100 and up.

  18. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    The fact that I'm a total noob and never used clipless pedals is what interests me in these.

    I don't want a race version to be my first foray into the clipless pedal world and I don't want 2lb bricks for pedals on this bike either.

    Any good options for cleats in wide widths? Only ones I see are Shimano and they are $100 and up.
    In my opinion, if you are using the pedals with cycling shoes as they were both designed, then threre is no need for larger platforms on the pedals. Common SPD or CrankBro pedals are perfect.
    If you are hopping on your bike to spin around the neighborhood with tennis shoes on, you would be fine on the same small SPD pedals.
    In my personal experience I found no extra benefit to the SPD with the surrounding platform. When clipped in, 95% of my shoe's support came from the clip/pedal mechanism, not the surrounding.

    As for shoes (which is what I assume you meant) in wide sizes at understandable prices, I'd check out Specialized Mid range shoes.
    Hammerheadbikes.com

  19. #69

  20. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    The fact that I'm a total noob and never used clipless pedals is what interests me in these.

    I don't want a race version to be my first foray into the clipless pedal world and I don't want 2lb bricks for pedals on this bike either.

    Any good options for cleats in wide widths? Only ones I see are Shimano and they are $100 and up.
    I have a wide foot as well! I went to a LBS since the fellow said they could order them for me if they could not come up with store cleats to fit me. He tried a Specialized shoe since the fellow said they have a very wide toe box and he was correct. I left the store with the cleats and the cost was less than $100 and they are super comfortable, a great fit.

    I loved being clipped in, you feel like you are more of a part of the bike and seem to have better control, IMO!

  21. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    That's what I've been told. One of the guys I talked to pointed out the fact that you can lift the rear of the bike with your feet during jumps which can save the rear tire/rim from damage etc.

    The only things I'm concerned about is falling and my left knee, which is in pretty bad shape. I've had to give up running because of it(not like I was a runner). I got into biking for the lower impact on the knees. I heard that some folks had issues with knee pain and some styles of pedals that didnt have enough "float".

    I'm going to be patient and go back up to the LBS and try some stuff. There I can physically touch and try things out. Only problem with that is I'm having trouble getting anything done because I've been riding all the time.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek CrossRip Elite-img_02432.jpg  

    Trek CrossRip Elite-img_02442.jpg  


  22. #72
    Holy Land Rider.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    111
    how about small block eight?
    but if you plan to change the tires at a trek dealer, than give i would try out LT3.
    i had a pair which i really liked.
    didnt have a single flat on those, used them for ~10 months.

  23. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    That's what I've been told. One of the guys I talked to pointed out the fact that you can lift the rear of the bike with your feet during jumps which can save the rear tire/rim from damage etc.

    The only things I'm concerned about is falling and my left knee, which is in pretty bad shape. I've had to give up running because of it(not like I was a runner). I got into biking for the lower impact on the knees. I heard that some folks had issues with knee pain and some styles of pedals that didnt have enough "float".

    I'm going to be patient and go back up to the LBS and try some stuff. There I can physically touch and try things out. Only problem with that is I'm having trouble getting anything done because I've been riding all the time.
    Great photos, I guess they are from Wilmington?

    Glad you are doing plenty of riding, that is what it is all about, exercise, being out of doors and enjoying the scenery.

    You will love being clipped in. It is somewhat of a learning curve but you will get it and love it. I feel it puts less pressure on my body since the motion is more controlled and the tension and compression is always equal. It will become second nature.

  24. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Those pics are of the Cape Fear river in Carolina Beach. I posted a few more pics in the Singletrack photo thread too.

    It was beautiful all weekend here. I rode over at Wrightsville beach and put another 20 miles on the bike. On one circuit I averaged almost 16mph over 6.5 miles. I'm pretty proud of that fact considering I'm a noob. Everytime I ride I get stronger and faster. It also really helps to have a bike you really want to ride.

  25. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    Those pics are of the Cape Fear river in Carolina Beach. I posted a few more pics in the Singletrack photo thread too.

    It was beautiful all weekend here. I rode over at Wrightsville beach and put another 20 miles on the bike. On one circuit I averaged almost 16mph over 6.5 miles. I'm pretty proud of that fact considering I'm a noob. Everytime I ride I get stronger and faster. It also really helps to have a bike you really want to ride.
    Sound like you are really enjoying yourself!

    Wish I could say the same, My new FS bike has been sitting in my utility room and all I can do is to look at it since the NY weather is not allowing me to ride.

  26. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    177
    Great to see some good information on the Crossrip. I plan on buying the base model because I really like the matte black color. Then, I am switching the drivetrain off of a broken bike onto the Crossrip. Will be a full build mix of 105 and Ultegra parts.
    Trek 69er SS (in progress), Trek Superfly, GT Force Carbon Expert, Trek Madone 6.2

  27. #77
    CS2
    CS2 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CS2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,670
    Quote Originally Posted by heyitsmebob View Post
    Great to see some good information on the Crossrip. I plan on buying the base model because I really like the matte black color. Then, I am switching the drivetrain off of a broken bike onto the Crossrip. Will be a full build mix of 105 and Ultegra parts.
    Post pics when it's done. It sounds like a nice build.
    A garage full of steel frames means happiness.

  28. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: davesauvageau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,048
    I work at a Trek shop and am conflicted with the Crossrip. Seeing so many other companies are unveiling high-end disc cross bikes and Trek seems like they just dipped their toe in the water with this bike. I was hoping to see a competitive disc cross bike, more like a Cronus CX with discs not a fitness bike with a drop bar. If you like the bike and it works for you thats great but I was hoping to see more from Trek. They better step it up next year, discs are just getting too popular to put off releasing a competitive bike.
    My motorcycle runs on infant blood

  29. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    292
    everything i was working on
    to get this bike.
    just did not transpire.

  30. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ncruz408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    229
    any other crossrip updates? Looking into this bike as well as a secondary fun bike

  31. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I ended up buying a Cannondale, got a good price on a left over and went with it since the components were much better than the Trek but does not have disc brakes.

  32. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1

    Weight

    HI!

    I am considering buying a Crossrip.
    Can anyone tell me the weight of the crossrip / elite please, I cant find it online, and my dealer cant order the bike just to look at.

    Also I prefer the black color of the "normal" version to the Elite. How "bad" are the standard components, or how much better is the elite here? The thread does sound very much in favour of the elite components.

    Would it be feasible to update the components later, or would you say that makes no sense?

    Thanks so much,
    Thomas

  33. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I went with a Cannondale since it was a left over and the component group was about two levels better than the Trek and the price was slightly higher than the Trek.

    I am very happy with the bike! I think mine weights about 22 lbs and is a 58cm frame.

  34. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    My Elite weighs 26lb and is a 50cm frame. I too prefer the black color, but having ridden both bikes the Elite does have the better components and is worth the very small price increase.

    Are there bikes out there with better components? Sure, from what I saw you either have to give up something (like the carbon fork and/or disc brakes) or pay significantly more. And those more expensive high end bikes are usually more competition oriented, something I have zero interest in. I bought this bike purely as a fitness and exploration bike. I also dont care for many of these overly extravagant color schemes many bikes have today. In my opinion both the standard and Elite version look great.

    I have ridden the hell out of this bike and have had ZERO issues or broken parts.

    Is it worth buying the standard model and upgrading? No, your money would be better spent elsewhere. Something like the Specialized Tricross comp disc compact would be nice and comes in black. But msrp is $1950.....

    I forgot to add that I've got a few add ons, hybrid spd/platform pedals, a small bag under the seat and a pocket on the top tube i use for my phone. I'm assuming these have added some weight, how much I dunno.
    Last edited by Clint Beastwood; 04-05-2013 at 09:19 PM. Reason: additional info

  35. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I went with the Cannondale to get the better drivetrain/shifter set since that is a very significant and interactive component on a bike.

  36. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Rick

    In my limited experience with the bikes i've rode and test rode at the LBS I just didn't see that much improvement with the ultra high end drivetrain/comps as some of you guys claim.

    Brakes are a very significant and interactive component on a bike too and I personally saw more of an improvement with disc brakes over traditional brakes than I did with more expensive comps and one more gear. Sometimes I think that folk get carried away with having to have the top of the line stuff and have to have the baddest bike on the block if you know what I mean.

    Did you ever get the brake chatter issue solved?

    To each is own. Like I said, it seems you have to give up something to get another in this class of bike unless you want to pay significantly more cash. Honestly, the only way you're going to get everything exactly the way you want is to build a bike yourself.

  37. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I am sure I would have been very happy with the CrossRipp and i would have ordered one had I not had the opportunity to get this Cannonade CX bike, for a great price.

    I am very happy with the bike and the bike shop. The brake chatter resolved itself, I guess the pads had to break in and I did give it a chance. The bike shop wanted me to immediately bring it back so they could take a look but now it is a non issue.

    The bike is great, shifting is very smooth, quiet and effortless, just what I was hoping for.I love the tires, they are highly rated for both road and trail, Schwalbe, Sammy Slicks and they are awesome, just what I was looking for. I am really liking this bike but it is my backup for when the trails are wet or muddy. My first love is my FS Trek XC bike however the Cannonade is a really nice bike and I am enjoying having two very different bikes, kind-of the best of both worlds.

  38. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by rickcin View Post
    I am sure I would have been very happy with the CrossRipp and i would have ordered one had I not had the opportunity to get this Cannonade CX bike, for a great price.

    I am very happy with the bike and the bike shop. The brake chatter resolved itself, I guess the pads had to break in and I did give it a chance. The bike shop wanted me to immediately bring it back so they could take a look but now it is a non issue.

    The bike is great, shifting is very smooth, quiet and effortless, just what I was hoping for.I love the tires, they are highly rated for both road and trail, Schwalbe, Sammy Slicks and they are awesome, just what I was looking for. I am really liking this bike but it is my backup for when the trails are wet or muddy. My first love is my FS Trek XC bike however the Cannonade is a really nice bike and I am enjoying having two very different bikes, kind-of the best of both worlds.
    Hey guys I'm a noob looking for a little advice (cliffs at the bottom ). I have a Hardtail 29er MTB and am looking to get on something a little faster and more road appropriate, although I don't want a true road bike as a lot of the riding in my area has various types of terrain and I dont want to be constricted to just smooth pavement. Naturally I've come across cyclocross and it seems to be what I'm looking for.

    My LBS has a leftover cannondale CX that rickin picked up, and the crossrip. Because of what I've read in this thread I thought the cannondale would be a better buy due to better components. The salesman at my LBS instructed me that a true cyclocross bike has a gear set up a lot more like a mountain bike and wont be as fast as a bike like the cross rip, which he said isn't actually a cyclocross bike . Admittedly I'm not 100% sure what he was saying, but basically the road bikes have bigger gears and thus allow for the bikes to move much faster with less effort.

    Being a noob this is the first I've heard of this concept. Now knowing I don't want to get on a true roadbike, but definitely want to be able to move faster than I'm currently capable of on my MTB, would you guys suggest the crossrip over the cannondale? I would like to have the option to race cyclocross at some point in the future, but that is literally just a thought in my head and I'd hate to give up a lot of speed now for that option that I may never fulfill.

    My apologies for the ramble and thank you in advance for any insight.

    Cliffs: Is a true cyclocross bike going to be markedly slower than the crossrip to the point where it would warrant the crossrip purchase over a cyclocross bike when looking for speed?

  39. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I am not qualified to answer your question regarding which bike is faster. I guess it depends on the specific gear ratios and if you are referring to high end speed, I guess that would vary depending on where you were racing, the specific elevation changes?

    Certain gearing would benefit specific terrain conditions and Ido not have enough knowledge to be able to make a recommendation. I went with the Cannondale since several bike shops had told me the components were much better, specifically the Shimano 105 group that came with the Cannondale.

  40. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    I looked up the specs on the bikes. Cannondale that Rick has uses a 46/36 double up front and a close ratio 12-28 10 speed cassette. The CrossRip Elite uses a 50/34 double up front and wide ratio mountain bike style 11-32 9 speed cassette. The standard CrossRip uses a 52/42/30 triple with a 12-26 8 speed cassette.

    Both the standard CrossRip and CrossRip Elite have a faster top gear and a lower low gear than the Cannondale. The standard CrossRip achieves this using the Triple crankset while the CrossRip Elite manages this with its wide ratio mountain bike style cassette out back.

    The Cannondale however with its close ratio gearing wont drop your cadence as much with each gear change. This also all may wash out being the Cannondale is lighter. The Cannondale is definitely the more race inspired bike. The CrossRip is more of a jack of all trades bike.



    Rick

    I'm shopping for a mountain bike now. You are right, these two style of bikes really are the best of both worlds.

  41. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    What are you looking to buy, a hardtail or a full suspension?
    I do not know what single track riding is available near Wilmington.
    There are some great places in Asheville and next month we will be going to Virginia to bike in the Blue Ridge Mountain area.
    For mountain biking, I go with the 29 ers.

  42. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Great explanation regarding the gear differences between the two bikes!

  43. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33
    Thank you guys both for your insight. I'm still not entirely sure which would be best suited for my desires, but from the information gathered here I'm pretty sure I can't go too far wrong with either one.

    I love how light the cannondale is along with the option to race cyclocross at some point (and that I'll be getting a solid discount on a 2012) but I also really like the crossrip having two sets of brake levers and that I was told it would likely be faster.

    I guess I have some thinking to do . Thank you guys again!

  44. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    No problem. Honestly you can't go wrong either way, your usage will determine which bike is better suited for you.

    Rick

    I wasn't aware of these until a few days ago,

    Blue Clay Bike Park | Cape Fear SORBA | Wilmington, NC

    Brunswick Nature Park | Cape Fear SORBA | Wilmington, NC

    From what I understand Blue Clay cycle park has held Cyclocross events too.

    As far as a mountain bike I'm looking at 29er hardtails. Don't think I want to go straight to a full suspension bike. Especially considering I'm trying to build a stable of decent bikes for the entire family. I don't think a FS bike is going to pull any street duty.

    Been looking at the Trek Mamba and Cobia as well as others. I'm not stuck on Trek by any means but the bike shop closest to me is a big Trek dealer. They do deal with Cannondale and Giant too, so I'll be looking at those as well.

  45. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ncruz408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    229
    I have a 2013 Trek Mamba with upgrades at 27 pounds. Can't go wrong with it but if u have the budget go for the cobia. The amount of upgrades it has is better cost sufficient than upgrading the mamba. I spent almost 1k in upgrades when I could of put $2000 into a better spec'ed bike like the X-cal. Hope this makes sense =) Also looking at the crossrip elite for some urban riding since Spring Sales are popping up everywhere.

  46. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ncruz408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    229
    OMG, I think I may have found my next bike. I was looking for something very similar to the crossrip (Urban road riding bike that can take on a commute and abuse) Cyclocross came to mine because I love the "best of both worlds" concept but found this: Specialized Bicycle Components More for road use than mountain but comes with discs for those wet, muddy, seasons. They also have a tricross as well for more mountain trail use. What do you guys think? Currently it is on sale $1100 at my LBS.

  47. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    I really liked my Cobia, it was a great bike for the money!

  48. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by ncruz408 View Post
    OMG, I think I may have found my next bike. I was looking for something very similar to the crossrip (Urban road riding bike that can take on a commute and abuse) Cyclocross came to mine because I love the "best of both worlds" concept but found this: Specialized Bicycle Components More for road use than mountain but comes with discs for those wet, muddy, seasons. They also have a tricross as well for more mountain trail use. What do you guys think? Currently it is on sale $1100 at my LBS.
    Looks like a nice ride. Personally I would rather have the Tricross over it though, and I would take the CrossRip Elite over all but the Tricross comp disc compact. Unfortunately that bike has an msrp of $1950.

    My worry about the Secteur is that its a road bike with discs. How is it going to handle in crappy conditions let alone gravel roads and single track. It has 28c tires, personally I would want nothing less than 32c tires on it and I'm considering putting 35c tires on my CrossRip after yesterday at the mountain bike park I went to. In my opinion the CrossRip Elite is a better buy, pretty much the same drivetrain and components but has hidden cables and one step up in brakes with secondary brake levers. The geometry is more suited to the type of riding we've been talking about here and has 32c tires already with room for 45c.

    Ultimately you are the only one who can decide. Go in and ride them, buy whichever one you prefer and/or fits your needs.

    Quote Originally Posted by rickcin View Post
    I really liked my Cobia, it was a great bike for the money!
    Thats what I've been reading, everyone has had good things to say about it. I'll be honest though the bike that I really want is the Superfly AL Elite. And after yesterdays tough workout at Blue Clay bike park on the CrossRip it won't be long before a nice new 29er finds it's way home with me.
    Last edited by Clint Beastwood; 04-12-2013 at 05:55 PM.

  49. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ncruz408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Beastwood View Post
    Looks like a nice ride. Personally I would rather have the Tricross over it though, and I would take the CrossRip Elite over all but the Tricross comp disc compact. Unfortunately that bike has an msrp of $1950.

    My worry about the Secteur is that its a road bike with discs. How is it going to handle in crappy conditions let alone gravel roads and single track. It has 28c tires, personally I would want nothing less than 32c tires on it and I'm considering putting 35c tires on my CrossRip after yesterday at the mountain bike park I went to. In my opinion the CrossRip Elite is a better buy, pretty much the same drivetrain and components but has hidden cables and one step up in brakes with secondary brake levers. The geometry is more suited to the type of riding we've been talking about here and has 32c tires already with room for 45c.

    Ultimately you are the only one who can decide. Go in and ride them, buy whichever one you prefer and/or fits your needs.



    Thats what I've been reading, everyone has had good things to say about it. I'll be honest though the bike that I really want is the Superfly AL Elite. And after yesterdays tough workout at Blue Clay bike park on the CrossRip it won't be long before a nice new 29er finds it's way home with me.
    Just tested the Secteur and you are absolutely right. The ride was very harsh compared to a CX bike. I did test a Raleigh RX and it was comfortable just the gearing was not so great at 46/36 11-28. Also, the second brakes are very useful on a CX bike. Wish I had a dealer in which carries the Crossrip to test.

  50. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rickcin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by ncruz408 View Post
    OMG, I think I may have found my next bike. I was looking for something very similar to the crossrip (Urban road riding bike that can take on a commute and abuse) Cyclocross came to mine because I love the "best of both worlds" concept but found this: Specialized Bicycle Components More for road use than mountain but comes with discs for those wet, muddy, seasons. They also have a tricross as well for more mountain trail use. What do you guys think? Currently it is on sale $1100 at my LBS.
    I agree with Clint. This bike is a road bike with the same drivetrain as the CrossRip Elite.
    I wanted a bike to compliment my Mtn bike, one I could ride when the trails are wet and muddy. With a XC bike, I could use it on pavement, stone dust, hardpack or some of the longer trails that have those combination of surfaces.
    A road bike is good if you are only going to ride on roads alongside traffic, just not for me,at least not most of the time.
    I am loving my two different styles of bikes, a XC and a FS, what is better than having options? Yesterday was a paved rail trail for 20 miles and today will be a mountain run for about 10 miles!

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •