Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22

    Distance issue with TRP CX8.4 brakes on Tricross

    I'm upgrading my Tricross with a set of TRP CX8.4's. It previously had Avid Shorty 6 on it.

    I'm having trouble getting the distance between the top of the brake arms to match what the instructions says. It calls for no more than 45 mm, but I'm getting around 60 mm. I already have the narrow spacers on the pad side.

    TRP brake shoe | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    TRP brake shoe distance | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    Do all CX bikes have the same spacing between the brake bosses?

    Just to experiment a bit I tried to use the brake shoes from the Avids, and then the spacing looks much better:

    Canti brake shoe | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    Canti brake shoe distance | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    Am I doing something wrong?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22

    Distance issue with TRP CX8.4 brakes on Tricross

    I measured the distance between my brake bosses, it's approx 75 mm.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,496
    Try using the washers from the canti shoes on the TRP shoes.
    2012 On One Whippet 650b
    2012 Santa Cruz TRc 650b
    2014 On One Dirty Disco
    2010 Soma Groove
    1987 Haro RS1

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    800
    Variables at play are the distance between the frame bosses, width of the rim, thickness of pads and spacers. There definitely are differences between the boss width on different frames. 80mm boss width is probably most typical these days but there are plenty of frames out there with boss width a low as 65mm. I don't think that the wider arm spacing you are getting is really a problem for function of the brakes other than effecting the clearance for the arms out past the frame for hitting your legs & body, still certainly less protrusion than most cantilever arms.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    569
    Simialr issues when I Installed mine overe a year ago, I just screw it got it close as I could and it has never been an issue.

    Edit this was not on a tricross, on a Rocky Mtn CXR, and they are great brakes worlds of differnece over the cheap cantis that were on that bike.
    XC, Road, XXC, Endurance, Mtn, All-Mtn, Cross, Gravel, just go have fun on 2 wheels!

  6. #6
    powered by peanut butter.
    Reputation: heartland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    596
    Just to add to the data set--my 8.4s measure ~40mm on a Surly Cross Check. I didn't measure them at all when I set them up, though. That's just where they ended up after lots of tinkering to get the lever feel that I wanted. I don't imagine the cable distance measurement matters too much. I'd just focus on getting them to perform how you want. They're GREAT brakes imho. I think you'll like 'em.
    "Never trust a man in a blue trench coat. Never drive a car when you're dead." -- Tom Waits

Similar Threads

  1. Tricross vs Cyclocross (Specialized)
    By Seasonal in forum Cyclocross
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-27-2013, 06:01 PM
  2. XTR trail brakes, lever issue
    By bratok in forum Brake Time
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-26-2013, 02:16 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-03-2012, 09:15 PM
  4. Marlin Brakes issue.
    By andrewfox5 in forum Trek
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-31-2012, 05:33 AM
  5. Intensity vs distance in ultra distance training
    By shackleton47 in forum Endurance XC Racing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-13-2011, 05:57 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •