Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 59
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cajonezzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    171

    XCL , what are similar suspension designs?

    Just looking up the lineage of my new XCL---- I see a few bikes that look similar ( Nicolai?) Hoping someone could fill me in.


    thx!


    cz

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wankel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    603
    Titus Motolite

  3. #3
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Jamis Dakar is about as far back as you'll go on this.

  4. #4
    Flying Goat
    Reputation: mrpercussive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,321
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Jamis Dakar is about as far back as you'll go on this.
    look again...

  5. #5
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Let me guess, Chumba invented that too, hoo hoo.

  6. #6
    Flying Goat
    Reputation: mrpercussive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,321
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Let me guess, Chumba invented that too, hoo hoo.
    XCL runs a different version of the horst link and i believe Chumba is the only company in the US who doesnt have to pay Specialized for the Horst patent... So in a way... YES


  7. #7
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Anyway, the Jamis Dakar was the first of those designs.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Anyway, the Jamis Dakar was the first of those designs.
    lol....maybe if you get all your information from reading magazine ads...there are a few companies that used the mcpherson strut before that model existed...mostly small frame builders (at the time) who probably didn't have huge advertising budgets..
    Last edited by CHUMBAevo; 10-17-2008 at 07:46 PM.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  9. #9
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    lol....maybe if you get all your information from reading magazine ads...there are a few companies that used the mcpherson strut before that model existed...mostly small frame builders (at the time) who probably didn't have huge advertising budgets..
    That's not a mac strut suspension. THe moment a swing link was put in, it was not a mac strut. The moment the racer X got a swing link, it was no longer a mac strut.

    I don't read magazines. In a Mac Strut setup, the strut becomes a suspension member that replaces some other members, with the bad part being that it accepts side loads readily. In the bike application, as well as in the car, the rates are controlled pretty much by the shock and remaining linkage, while an intermediate swing link changes the characteristics, though removing much of those side loads (which is a good thing).

    I also don't listen to percussive, like most here don't. He makes Chumba look bad. Tell him to tone it down.

    So instead of giggling, how about speaking of the unnamed companies?

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    That's not a mac strut suspension. THe moment a swing link was put in, it was not a mac strut. The moment the racer X got a swing link, it was no longer a mac strut.

    I don't read magazines. In a Mac Strut setup, the strut becomes a suspension member that replaces some other members, with the bad part being that it accepts side loads readily. In the bike application, as well as in the car, the rates are controlled pretty much by the shock and remaining linkage, while an intermediate swing link changes the characteristics, though removing much of those side loads (which is a good thing).

    I also don't listen to percussive, like most here don't. He makes Chumba look bad. Tell him to tone it down.

    So instead of giggling, how about speaking of the unnamed companies?
    Ok - now how did you conclude adding a swinglink changes the terminology? I guess now you're also the authority on naming suspension designs? Also -- about toning it down -- maybe you should look at the rafter in your own eye rather than the splinter in your brothers? While I appreciate that you might enjoy debate -- many of us -- including myself, don't come to the forum to argue. Is this how you talk to people in person?
    Last edited by CHUMBAevo; 10-18-2008 at 08:33 AM.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  11. #11
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    No, I don't speak to people like this in person. Same question applies to you. Do you ask people in real life if they act like such and such on an internet forum where debate is part of the game?

    I did not conclude that the swinglink changes a suspension from a mac strut to otherwise. THAT IS THE DEFINITION of a Mac Strut design. In a car, you have a choice between the so-called double wishbone or short-long arm suspension, or you can have a lower control arm with a strut acting as the upper, simply put. However, with the SLA, you have to beef up the body to accept the forces acting on it in different points.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    No, I don't speak to people like this in person. Same question applies to you.

    I did not conclude that the swinglink changes a suspension from a mac strut to otherwise. THAT IS THE DEFINITION of a Mac Strut design. In a car, you have a choice between the so-called double wishbone or short-long arm suspension, or you can have a lower control arm with a strut acting as the upper, simply put. However, with the SLA, you have to beef up the body to accept the forces acting on it in different points.
    Many concepts, similar designs, are borrowed from the motorcycle/car industry -- does that mean that the same definition holds the exact same meaning across the car/motorcycle/and bike industries? In my experience - often times, there can be varying difference in the terminology as the applications are obviously different.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  13. #13
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Then why call it a mac strut if it's not a mac strut, which came from the automotive industry?

  14. #14
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Then why call it a mac strut if it's not a mac strut, which came from the automotive industry?
    JC at it again
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  15. #15
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    Also -- about toning it down -- maybe you should look at the rafter in your own eye rather than the splinter in your brothers?
    Have you read the latest review of the F5.

    The moment you lay your eyes on a fully built F5, you just go in awe. Every detail which goes into the frame is just amazing from the swingarm, to the motolink to the gussets. Truly a work of art. And then when you get on one, the geometry is just so dialed that it doesnt really take anything to get used to it. It just feels down right.

    The F5 lets you rail corners with ease and when you need to, you can kick the rear end out to get some drift if needed to change an angle. Simply amazing. The progressive rear end makes the bike feel virtually bottomless. All drops and jumps feel soft and make you wonder what you worried about in the first place... The geometry is also so dialed that it naturally makes you keep the bike nice and low on the jumps. The 8.5" of travel in the rear keeps this bike planted yet still feels lively in which you think of where you want to be and then BOOM, you're there. Simply amazing. The floater which comes with the bike also eliminates all brake jack and such. Braking in the rough is of no problem at all as the rear end remains insanely active. This is one amazing bike and does everything it was designed to do. And thats, go FAST.

    Being a full on DH race bike, this bike is still very freerideable. Throwing down some steez is easy and so natural with how lively it feels and as mentioned before about the progressive travel, doing big 20foot drops are of no problem...


    This site is based upon product review, and that ones a bit loaded. Granted some other reviews are not that informative, but "drifting different angles" WTF is that, mentioning the bike is freeridable? well I can peddle it to the Circle K, so it can be used as a road bike or for commuting? comparing an F5 to an Ibex Zone, ROTFLMAO. MrP did not do a 20' drop on that bike. If he did we would have seen pictures of it the next day, reguardless of if he made it or not.

    If he really road an F5 three months ago, he would have been pouring his kool-aid here the next day. Besides the point, PRODUCT USED: doesnt mean I took a spin on one at a demo day, 3 months is a down rite FALSE statement. You have your hands full Chumba, I am sure XD is a great guy, but his approach to a bike review is a bit slanted.

    Also does the floating brake come with the bike, or is it an option?
    Last edited by Ibex-dad; 10-19-2008 at 05:12 AM. Reason: Mods: How many other BS reviews are you gonna allow?

  16. #16
    Flying Goat
    Reputation: mrpercussive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,321
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Have you read the latest review of the F5.

    The moment you lay your eyes on a fully built F5, you just go in awe. Every detail which goes into the frame is just amazing from the swingarm, to the motolink to the gussets. Truly a work of art. And then when you get on one, the geometry is just so dialed that it doesnt really take anything to get used to it. It just feels down right.

    The F5 lets you rail corners with ease and when you need to, you can kick the rear end out to get some drift if needed to change an angle. Simply amazing. The progressive rear end makes the bike feel virtually bottomless. All drops and jumps feel soft and make you wonder what you worried about in the first place... The geometry is also so dialed that it naturally makes you keep the bike nice and low on the jumps. The 8.5" of travel in the rear keeps this bike planted yet still feels lively in which you think of where you want to be and then BOOM, you're there. Simply amazing. The floater which comes with the bike also eliminates all brake jack and such. Braking in the rough is of no problem at all as the rear end remains insanely active. This is one amazing bike and does everything it was designed to do. And thats, go FAST.

    Being a full on DH race bike, this bike is still very freerideable. Throwing down some steez is easy and so natural with how lively it feels and as mentioned before about the progressive travel, doing big 20foot drops are of no problem...


    This site is based upon product review, and that ones a bit loaded. Granted some other reviews are not that informative, but "drifting different angles" WTF is that, mentioning the bike is freeridable? well I can peddle it to the Circle K, so it can be used as a road bike or for commuting? comparing an F5 to an Ibex Zone, ROTFLMAO. MrP did not do a 20' drop on that bike. If he did we would have seen pictures of it the next day, reguardless of if he made it or not.

    If he really road an F5 three months ago, he would have been pouring his kool-aid here the next day. Besides the point, PRODUCT USED: doesnt mean I took a spin on one at a demo day, 3 months is a down rite FALSE statement. You have your hands full Chumba, I am sure XD is a great guy, but his approach to a bike review is a bit slanted.

    Also does the floating brake come with the bike, or is it an option?
    You should talk to the other guys who just got F5s or the ones who demoed it at the dirt demo day and are selling their Demos, Glory and etc... Also, you should not only post things you choose to post. In the list, i also put in Commencal Supreme and Spec Demo... As for 20 footers, yes i have done it before... It was also the picture in which i won photo of the month of may for DirtCartel btw... The pic i've got isnt on my F5, but yes, i've done it on the F5... Stop stirring the sh1t pot when you dont know sh1t...




    I never said it can be used for commuting and such though i have done it riding it around SF to get to the NWD9 premiere or to school... It does pedal well though for a DH bike. And yes, i do have my hands full... 9 classes, work, and weekends i'd rather be riding... My reviews might be a little slanted maybe to some. But those who have ridden bikes dont think so. Only those who have had some bad history with me like you and JC keep stirring the pot as dogonfr would put it...

    Yes, the F5 comes with the floating brake. It even says it on the website... Shows you how much you do your research if you cant even look for 5 minutes...

  17. #17
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114

    BS review of an advertisers bike - Sponsored and bias.

    Quote Originally Posted by mrpercussive
    ... As for 20 footers, yes i have done it before... It was also the picture in which i won photo of the month of may for DirtCartel btw...
    Not 20', and you didnt stick the landing. You take every oportunity to toot your horn, I've seen that picture in apx 10 other posts. It's not about you, it's about the integrity of this site.

    If you continue to pile up these BS reviews the site will be so top heavy with false information it will roll over into the depths of pinkbike. Keep it up sport.

    Please explain how you have 3 months experience on the bike.
    Last edited by Ibex-dad; 10-19-2008 at 08:13 AM. Reason: Mods: Lock it up, another BS review for one of your advertisers!!

  18. #18
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Not 20', and you didnt stick the landing. You take every oportunity to toot your horn, I've seen that picture in apx 10 other posts. It's not about you, it's about the integrity of this site.

    If you continue to pile up these BS reviews the site will be so top heavy with false information it will roll over into the depths of pinkbike. Keep it up sport.

    Please explain how you have 3 months experience on the bike.
    Lack of ID you really need to go find a life other then acting like a perv tracking down mrperc every where looking for love on the net, there are some good porn sites out there that should be more exciting then mrperc is, geezzz go wash yourself up after your mess.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ,,

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Have you read the latest review of the F5.

    The moment you lay your eyes on a fully built F5, you just go in awe. Every detail which goes into the frame is just amazing from the swingarm, to the motolink to the gussets. Truly a work of art. And then when you get on one, the geometry is just so dialed that it doesnt really take anything to get used to it. It just feels down right.

    The F5 lets you rail corners with ease and when you need to, you can kick the rear end out to get some drift if needed to change an angle. Simply amazing. The progressive rear end makes the bike feel virtually bottomless. All drops and jumps feel soft and make you wonder what you worried about in the first place... The geometry is also so dialed that it naturally makes you keep the bike nice and low on the jumps. The 8.5" of travel in the rear keeps this bike planted yet still feels lively in which you think of where you want to be and then BOOM, you're there. Simply amazing. The floater which comes with the bike also eliminates all brake jack and such. Braking in the rough is of no problem at all as the rear end remains insanely active. This is one amazing bike and does everything it was designed to do. And thats, go FAST.

    Being a full on DH race bike, this bike is still very freerideable. Throwing down some steez is easy and so natural with how lively it feels and as mentioned before about the progressive travel, doing big 20foot drops are of no problem...


    This site is based upon product review, and that ones a bit loaded. Granted some other reviews are not that informative, but "drifting different angles" WTF is that, mentioning the bike is freeridable? well I can peddle it to the Circle K, so it can be used as a road bike or for commuting? comparing an F5 to an Ibex Zone, ROTFLMAO. MrP did not do a 20' drop on that bike. If he did we would have seen pictures of it the next day, reguardless of if he made it or not.

    If he really road an F5 three months ago, he would have been pouring his kool-aid here the next day. Besides the point, PRODUCT USED: doesnt mean I took a spin on one at a demo day, 3 months is a down rite FALSE statement. You have your hands full Chumba, I am sure XD is a great guy, but his approach to a bike review is a bit slanted.

    Also does the floating brake come with the bike, or is it an option?
    From every review we've received from DIRT UK, Decline Mag, Mountain Bike Action, Australia Mountain Bike; feedback from national champions and everyday riders -- they have all been rave reviews. If you have such a problem with the reviews - why not demo the bike yourself and then make observations yourself instead of attacking people?
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  20. #20
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    From every review we've received from DIRT UK, Decline Mag, Mountain Bike Action, Australia Mountain Bike; feedback from national champions and everyday riders -- they have all been rave reviews. If you have such a problem with the reviews - why not demo the bike yourself and then make observations yourself instead of attacking people?
    So your stand is that it is acceptable to make false statements about the bike, and that is is OK to bring the validity of the information here down to the level of pinkbike?


    Dog: Didnt Versus ask you to stop doing the same thing? Running your mouth that is.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    So your stand is that it is acceptable to make false statements about the bike, and that is is OK to bring the validity of the information here down to the level of pinkbike?


    Dog: Didnt Versus ask you to stop doing the same thing? Running your mouth that is.
    That is far from what I said. What did he say that you are taking so much issue with? It's bicycles that we are talking about - they are supposed to be fun, remember? Take a deep breath and relax. You don't need to get so worked up.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  22. #22
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    24,045
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    Ok - now how did you conclude adding a swinglink changes the terminology? I guess now you're also the authority on naming suspension designs? Also -- about toning it down -- maybe you should look at the rafter in your own eye rather than the splinter in your brothers? While I appreciate that you might enjoy debate -- many of us -- including myself, don't come to the forum to argue. Is this how you talk to people in person?
    Do you even know what you are talking about here?

    Amp B-3 was a mac-strut design.

    Amp B5 was a linkage-design.

    Both were horst links, only one was a mac-strut, because it didn't have a swing-link.

    Bottomline, know what you are talking about or don't try and pretend that everyone else is stupid.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    Quote Originally Posted by mrpercussive



    :
    Call me crazy, but that does not look like a 20' drop.

    Here's a 12ft drop stolen from NSMB.com, and there are guys on their claiming it's less than that. It looks just a bit bigger than your 20ft drop....

  24. #24
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    So your stand is that it is acceptable to make false statements about the bike, and that is is OK to bring the validity of the information here down to the level of pinkbike?

    Read what he said "why not demo the bike yourself and then make observations yourself"


    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Dog: Didnt Versus ask you to stop doing the same thing? Running your mouth that is.
    Actually it was a now mod, there is more then what you think you read.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  25. #25
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by MattP.
    Call me crazy, but that does not look like a 20' drop.
    There are many places to measure from and the debate will never end, that is a long drop from lip to landing on a steep and very narrow area, you should really see the approach that is possibly worse then the drop.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem
    Do you even know what you are talking about here?

    Amp B-3 was a mac-strut design.

    Amp B5 was a linkage-design.

    Both were horst links, only one was a mac-strut, because it didn't have a swing-link.

    Bottomline, know what you are talking about or don't try and pretend that everyone else is stupid.
    Jayem - I'm not trying to pretend or say that anyone is stupid. I'm familiar with all of the AMP Bikes - one of their lead engineers works out of an office right next to ours and we've had discussions about all the AMP models and the evolution of said designs. Being in Anaheim - there were a lot of framebuilders in the early 1990s within 30 minutes of each other that had a hand in evolving these designs -including Mantis and AMP - among others. Does the Macpherson strut mean the exact same thing in the automobile industry as the bicycle industry? I don't think so - the Macpherson strut that is used in an automobile usually functions not only for suspension but for steering also - whereas a bicycle's steering and rear suspension are generally independent of one another. You won't find things like lower control arms etc. in a bicycle's Macpherson design - so like I said before - different industries, different meanings. As for inserting a linkage piece to reduce side loads and help control the shock rate - does this mean its no longer a so-called Mac strut design? I would disagree because the original design of the bicycle largely stays in tact and I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense to categorize and define types of full suspension bikes as "linkage" bikes, and "non-linkage" bikes. The vast majority of recent full-suspension designs use some form of a "linkage" piece. Again, I've already made my point about nomenclature, semantics, or whatever you considered to be a point of disagreement. You have your opinion and I have mine.

    Believe and think what you like - really makes no difference to me. I'll say it again - relax - it's just bicycles - nothing to get worked up about. Go ride and have fun.
    Last edited by CHUMBAevo; 10-19-2008 at 06:22 PM.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dascro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    So your stand is that it is acceptable to make false statements about the bike, and that is is OK to bring the validity of the information here down to the level of pinkbike?

    The site walked down that path a while ago and the mods showed, with their actions, that is acceptable.

    BTW it seems like his stand is more along the lines of chumba has no problem with shills giving their products good reviews.

  28. #28
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    24,045
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    As for inserting a linkage piece to reduce side loads and help control the shock rate - does this mean its no longer a so-called Mac strut design?
    Well, ever since the amp came out, you're the first person to try and change the mountain bike application of that word.

    Old FSR, Racer X, Amp, Intense, and some others were "mac strut bikes", acknowledged by the manufacturer. When they started adding linkages, they called them linkage bikes. In case you haven't noticed, there are still a lot of non-linkage FS bikes around.

    The term Mac Strut was and has been used to describe a bike that does not use a linkage, yet has multiple pivots where the shock is serving as a structural member, at least until a few hours ago.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  29. #29
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem
    Well, ever since the amp came out, you're the first person to try and change the mountain bike application of that word.

    Old FSR, Racer X, Amp, Intense, and some others were "mac strut bikes", acknowledged by the manufacturer. When they started adding linkages, they called them linkage bikes. In case you haven't noticed, there are still a lot of non-linkage FS bikes around.

    The term Mac Strut was and has been used to describe a bike that does not use a linkage, yet has multiple pivots where the shock is serving as a structural member, at least until a few hours ago.
    Google suxz but guess it's better than nothin.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacPherson_strut

    http://www.autozine.org/technical_sc...uspension2.htm

    Specialized brain wash
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  30. #30
    Flying Goat
    Reputation: mrpercussive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    11,321
    you guys need to chill... i understand to some that the internet is some serious business... but why not just go out on your bicycle and just ride??? I know thats what i did today... XD


  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem
    Well, ever since the amp came out, you're the first person to try and change the mountain bike application of that word.

    Old FSR, Racer X, Amp, Intense, and some others were "mac strut bikes", acknowledged by the manufacturer. When they started adding linkages, they called them linkage bikes. In case you haven't noticed, there are still a lot of non-linkage FS bikes around.

    The term Mac Strut was and has been used to describe a bike that does not use a linkage, yet has multiple pivots where the shock is serving as a structural member, at least until a few hours ago.
    The first amp came out now what - over 15 years ago? And who is "they"? The marketing department of XYZ company?

    -A.
    Last edited by CHUMBAevo; 10-19-2008 at 09:41 PM.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    No, I don't speak to people like this in person. Same question applies to you. Do you ask people in real life if they act like such and such on an internet forum where debate is part of the game?
    I don't mind debate - so long as it is constructive - and doesn't end up in personal attacks. I would just encourage a better tone if at all possible - not pointing at you in particular - but just in general - to have more civil discussion.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  33. #33
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    I don't mind debate - so long as it is constructive - and doesn't end up in personal attacks. I would just encourage a better tone if at all possible - not pointing at you in particular - but just in general - to have more civil discussion.
    Wait, I bailed out nearly a day ago when I saw that reviews were being shilled, akin to what Tony Ellsworth was doing years ago, which people still haven't forgotten about and has eventually ruined his company's reputation, but now you have a bad time with others calling the BS, and you're bringing it back to me?

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    Wait, I bailed out nearly a day ago when I saw that reviews were being shilled, akin to what Tony Ellsworth was doing years ago, which people still haven't forgotten about and has eventually ruined his company's reputation, but now you have a bad time with others calling the BS, and you're bringing it back to me?
    I was just replying to everyone - didn't mean to make you feel like you were being singled out or anything and I did mention it wasn't directed at you, but in general. I understand now some of the background behind what you were saying before.

    -A.
    Last edited by CHUMBAevo; 10-20-2008 at 01:10 AM.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  35. #35
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    I was just replying to everyone - didn't mean to make you feel like you were being singled out or anything and I did mention it wasn't directed at you, but in general. I understand now some of the background behind what you were saying before.

    -A.
    Thank you and I received your pm in regard. Continued success to you and your company and continued good-spirited debating.

  36. #36
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Can someone step forward and answer the question: Is it acceptable to give false information in a bike review?

    Chumba, Dog, XD, .......it's not about you or the bike, again it's about the accuracy of the bike reviews. If I was not informed properly and purchased a bike based upon a review, I would feel a little jilted.

    Post what ever pictures, OT BS, insults towards me that you want.............but to allow the quality of information in the reviews to desitergrate to such a low level is pathetic to say the least.

  37. #37
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by dogonfr
    There are many places to measure from and the debate will never end, that is a long drop from lip to landing on a steep and very narrow area, you should really see the approach that is possibly worse then the drop.
    Still doesnt make it 20', and he hasnt hit a 20' drop on the F5, just falsly stated that he has. End of story.

  38. #38
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Can someone step forward and answer the question: Is it acceptable to give false information in a bike review?

    Chumba, Dog, XD, .......it's not about you or the bike, again it's about the accuracy of the bike reviews. If I was not informed properly and purchased a bike based upon a review, I would feel a little jilted.

    Post what ever pictures, OT BS, insults towards me that you want.............but to allow the quality of information in the reviews to desitergrate to such a low level is pathetic to say the least.
    You can read reviews all day till your blue in the face and at the end will you be happy??? As mentioned at least 3 times go test ride one for yourself. Then come back and lets hear your personal opinion.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  39. #39
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    For the reference, here is the questionable review, stating "3 months" of usage datged less than one month after receipt, while pretty much all of the forums received the story of when it was actually received and used. Here is the entry from Perc's own blog, dated August 15th, and said bike wasn't even received at that point (was Aug 29, according to another thread).

    ChumbaEvo, I appreciate the constructive PM, and will continue with you later via pm as well.

  40. #40
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerk_Chicken
    For the reference, here is the questionable review, stating "3 months" of usage datged less than one month after receipt, while pretty much all of the forums received the story of when it was actually received and used. Here is the entry from Perc's own blog, dated August 15th, and said bike wasn't even received at that point (was Aug 29, according to another thread).

    ChumbaEvo, I appreciate the constructive PM, and will continue with you later via pm as well.
    Hes a college student every day is a month.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  41. #41
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by dogonfr
    You can read reviews all day till your blue in the face and at the end will you be happy??? As mentioned at least 3 times go test ride one for yourself. Then come back and lets hear your personal opinion.
    I dont doubt the bike is awesome, but personally dont like single pivot for DH, nor do I want a jack-shaft. I am hapy with my IH. And to be honest, it's not about my happiness, its not on the personal level (Yet), it's about the exaggerations, and nicely put - lack of TRUTH, that bothers me.

    How is test riding an F5 gonna change the FACT that there are inconsistencies in the reviews and MTBR is not doing anything about it. It has an F88 ring to it IMO, advertiser, moderators, you and XD jumping in and asking everyone to "chill".

  42. #42
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    Still doesnt make it 20', and he hasnt hit a 20' drop on the F5, just falsly stated that he has. End of story.
    Balls in your court.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  43. #43
    I bike long tyme.
    Reputation: Secace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,099
    Quote Originally Posted by cajonezzz
    Just looking up the lineage of my new XCL---- I see a few bikes that look similar ( Nicolai?) Hoping someone could fill me in.
    cz
    In reference to the original post, I commented on the similarities between a certain Nicolai frame and the current XCL. I got chastised in short order by the Nicolai community at large for even speaking the names Chumba and Nicolai in the same sentence. Aside from some very minor differences in pivot point placements, I still maintain the designs are more similar than they are different. I agree.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  44. #44
    ride hard take risks
    Reputation: dogonfr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    25,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Secace
    In reference to the original post, I commented on the similarities between a certain Nicolai frame and the current XCL. I got chastised in short order by the Nicolai community at large for even speaking the names Chumba and Nicolai in the same sentence. Aside from some very minor differences in pivot point placements, I still maintain the designs are more similar than they are different. I agree.
    Karl was here as one of the designers with AMP Research back in the dayz.
    Formotion Products
    http://www.formot

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    So your stand is that it is acceptable to make false statements about the bike, and that is is OK to bring the validity of the information here down to the level of pinkbike?


    Dog: Didnt Versus ask you to stop doing the same thing? Running your mouth that is.
    In the interest of keeping peace and avoiding any flaming - I would just ask that everyone tone it down - to avoid future discussions like this.

    CHUMBA has many reviews on our website - and we can assure you that while we can't control user reviews - we are committed to maintaining quality information about our products and will take appropriate actions regarding such.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  46. #46
    banned by own request
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUMBAevo
    In the interest of keeping peace and avoiding any flaming - I would just ask that everyone tone it down - to avoid future discussions like this.

    CHUMBA has many reviews on our website - and we can assure you that while we can't control user reviews - we are committed to maintaining quality information about our products and will take appropriate actions regarding such.
    There are no flames, it's peacfull, the tone is down, this discusion will not go away until MTBR changes it's name to MTBS.

    One of your sponsored riders turned in a false review of your most expensive bike, and your not worried about what pops up on the net after that fact?

    Edit: If I was an advertiser here and this was happening to my product name, I sure as hell would ask to have the thread locked and review pulled. But hey, what do I know?

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibex-dad
    There are no flames, it's peacfull, the tone is down, this discusion will not go away until MTBR changes it's name to MTBS.

    One of your sponsored riders turned in a false review of your most expensive bike, and your not worried about what pops up on the net after that fact?
    I've already said that we are committed to maintaining the integrity of our reviews - and have already taken the appropriate actions.
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

  48. #48
    mmm
    Reputation: timehoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    953
    Back to topic, how is the horst link placement different where chumba doesnt have to pay Specialized?
    ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Select Start

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Vespasianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,415
    Quote Originally Posted by timehoc
    Back to topic, how is the horst link placement different where chumba doesnt have to pay Specialized?

    I don't think that is actually true...

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHUMBAevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,134
    FYI..for those still interested.. http://www.firstflightbikes.com/1996...El_Kaboing.htm
    Simple | Proven | Reliable

    http://chumbaracing.blogspot.com/

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •