Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Moderator Moderator
    Reputation: mtbxplorer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,479

    Surviving the Crash - Cyclists' Rights

    New book. Cyclists? Rights, Safety the Focus of Local Lawyer?s New Book | ARLnow.com

    I thought this part was interesting...
    "..said cyclists in particular should be aware of the “contributory negligence” statute in Virginia, Washington, D.C. and Maryland, three of just five states and cities in the country that have the rule."

    “If a cyclist is injured as the result of a motorist’s negligence, and the motorist was 99 percent at fault, but the cyclist was 1 percent negligent, and that negligence contributed to the accident, that cyclist is barred from recovering anything for his or her injuries, no matter how catastrophic,” Deming said. “You really have to be squeaky clean.”

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BrianMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,557
    I wonder if they sell cycling insurance in such states. The power/damage difference makes such a rule unfair. Need to know where this is a rule so I don't move there.

  3. #3
    Moderator Moderator
    Reputation: mtbxplorer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,479
    Alabama, DC, N. Carolina, Maryland, Virginia

    from
    What states are contributory negligence states

    More details on other states' provisions: http://www.latitudesubro.com/misc/co...negligence.pdf

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: newfangled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,132
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbxplorer View Post
    Alabama, DC, N. Carolina, Maryland, Virginia

    from
    What states are contributory negligence states

    More details on other states' provisions: http://www.latitudesubro.com/misc/co...negligence.pdf
    I assume this is to limit people suing one another over traffic accidents? But wow, that's crappy. It's like guilty until proven innocent. "Prove that you weren't at least 1% guilty" - how do you respond to that when traffic laws contain vague language like "practicable."

  5. #5
    Rep Power: Infinity
    Reputation: NateHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    11,781
    Quote Originally Posted by newfangled View Post
    I assume this is to limit people suing one another over traffic accidents? But wow, that's crappy. It's like guilty until proven innocent. "Prove that you weren't at least 1% guilty" - how do you respond to that when traffic laws contain vague language like "practicable."
    No doubt. Glad I don't live in one of those states.

Similar Threads

  1. Surviving the Summer Heat
    By mtbxplorer in forum Commuting
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2013, 08:09 AM
  2. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 03-27-2013, 11:06 AM
  3. [Q] Bike got damaged after crash, what are my rights?
    By Wasmachineman NL in forum Off Camber (off topic)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-23-2012, 08:34 PM
  4. surviving holes
    By SlimTwisted in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-07-2011, 06:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •