Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    weirdo
    Reputation: rodar y rodar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,699

    Run over cyclist = cycling ban

    More to it than that of course, but that`s the gist of it. The rest is in the article. I just saw this over on RBR and thought I`d crosspost it here.

    http://www.montrealgazette.com/techn...322/story.html

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    4,673
    Sounds like Canadians have their heads planted firmly in their asses about pretty much everything.

  3. #3
    weirdo
    Reputation: rodar y rodar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,699
    It isn`t the whole country. In fact, at the end of the article it mentions that Quebec has a pilot program going to start plowing some of their bike paths. I gotta agree that there are some planted heads involved though.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pop_martian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,581
    From the article: "Rivard said ice or snow did not seem to have played a role in the incident."

    So because of this they are going to enforce their no winter cycling law?
    "Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?"

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: the munts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Why don't they ban winter driving?
    read KNOBBY MEATS or be sadly ignorant of the mediocrity that is allowed to exist in the interwebs

  6. #6
    jrm
    jrm is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jrm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,138

    Dont most of those trucks have

    retracble or recessed hooks. Thats fricking grazy
    when a flatbed truck drove past him. The truck, designed to transport lumber, had hooks protruding from it. It moved over to give the cyclist room as it was passing but when it swerved back to regain the lane one of the hooks on the truck snagged the cyclist and pulled him under the truck's wheels,
    Wreck the malls with cows on Harleys

  7. #7
    No-Brakes Cougar
    Reputation: Gary the No-Trash Cougar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,143
    "but he said bicycles are not well-adapted to winter conditions"

    and

    "weather conditions, such as freezing rain, can make winter cycling dangerous, and cyclists should use their judgment about when it's safe to ride."

    Both of these statements are completely asinine in that they have very little to do with the reason the accident occurred. From reading the article, I gather that the accident occurred because the driver misjudged the length of his trailer, his speed and/or possibly the speed of the cyclist and did not allow for sufficient distance when passing the cyclist before moving back over in the lane. The fact that the cyclist was on the road during the winter, the summer, a solar eclipse or whatever has almost nothing to do with the fact that the driver of the truck made an error in judgment that cost a life. And yet, once again cyclists take the blame when they have little or no control over the situation to begin with.

    We often attribute things like this to driver cluelessness, but I think that the problem is that people cannot simply judge distances. I see this often, whether I am driving, biking or walking. Ever see a curb or divider on the street that has obviously been hit more than once? How about the wall on a freeway on-ramp? Ever had your car side-swiped while parked on the street? How many times have you almost got clipped while riding because some one came too close when passing? Many motorists seem to be lacking in basic visual/spatial skills and it makes me wonder how they ever pass their driving test. They simply cannot grasp where their vehicle ends and the rest of the world begins.
    R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio ~ July 10, 1942 May 16, 2010

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    147
    I believe that it is more likely that the driver simply didn't give a rat's ass. I see that a lot. When hot heads like that finally kill somebody, they become the star witness, so their version of events prevails - the only other witness can't testify.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Cino
    I believe that it is more likely that the driver simply didn't give a rat's ass. I see that a lot. When hot heads like that finally kill somebody, they become the star witness, so their version of events prevails - the only other witness can't testify.
    Pretty much what is going through my head.
    He obviously wasn't very attentive, or doesn't have much experience.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •