Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 94
  1. #1
    Medicine Wheel Guy
    Reputation: Martlet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    224

    One Aggro DHer...

    is NOT happy with Mr. Philips' latest writeup:

    http://gazetteoutthere.blogspot.com/...are-angry.html

    While I can understand he might have been a little peeved about "his" trail being publicized, this kind of response does nobody any good.

  2. #2
    Colorado
    Reputation: Drop the Seat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    452

  3. #3
    eci
    Reputation: snowskilz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,664
    wow, ive known about said trail for a while and honestly its not for the faint of heart. This is gonna attract some 16 yo dumb kid who will loose his brakes and then the trail is closed. HOOORRRRAY!

  4. #4
    Human Crayon
    Reputation: sleestak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    291
    ^^ agreed. I haven't seen the trail before, but some things are better left untold.

    Sounds pretty badass though.
    ..:: sleestak ::..
    [SIZE] Matters [/SIZE]

  5. #5
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Yeah - what an aggro downhiller, the nerve of some people. Say, ever wonder why there aren't more of us aggro types bombing the shite out of trails like Apex? Think it might have something to do with the existence of more appropriate spots? Nah, couldn't be.

    I love how the pompous clown who wrote the original piece feels the need to belittle the (understandably) upset DHer who wrote in, over his spelling. What a class act.

    The only one served by this brand of stupidity is Mr. Phillips, hopefully he enjoys the new found street cred (among those who are too stupid to know better) that comes with outing somebody's stash.
    Now with more vitriol!

  6. #6
    Your retarded
    Reputation: Nickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,085
    Martlet and Drop the Seat, I realize that your links are intended to be helpful and provide insight into what this thread is about, but would you please remove them? I ask because this trail does not need the extra publicity and your links are unintentionally giving it just that. Thank you.
    A trail thatís too difficult wouldnít exist because itíd never be used. But, trails can exist thatíre too difficult for you.

  7. #7
    Shoulda went faster
    Reputation: nomad rdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickle
    Martlet and Drop the Seat, I realize that your links are intended to be helpful and provide insight into what this thread is about, but would you please remove them? I ask because this trail does not need the extra publicity and your links are unintentionally giving it just that. Thank you.

    I second that. Please remove the links.

  8. #8
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Are you kidding me? Pretending that this trail doesn't exist when, apparently, anyone who might want to ride it in the Springs area knows about it, is ridiculous. If a report can sniff it out, I'm thinking any savvy bike kid can find it pretty easy. This is a trail that is "an old route that’s been on local maps for decades, and may date back to the era of the stagecoach." If it's dangerous, or potentially dangerous, it needs to be treated as such publically, like the free ride trail off the Lunch Loop in Grand Junction. Pushing it underground isn't going to help the sport.
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  9. #9
    Rolling
    Reputation: lidarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,110
    George Bush will delete it for you ya.

  10. #10
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by Godzilla
    I love how the pompous clown who wrote the original piece feels the need to belittle the (understandably) upset DHer who wrote in, over his spelling. What a class act.

    The only one served by this brand of stupidity is Mr. Phillips, hopefully he enjoys the new found street cred (among those who are too stupid to know better) that comes with outing somebody's stash.
    To be fair, the DH guy as belittling him for doing his job as a reporter. Neither too the high road.

    Wouldn't it be better for everyone to have a properly sanctioned trail to exist safely into the future for us and future users, as opposed to a secret one?
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  11. #11
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by lidarman
    George Bush will delete if you ya.
    McCain just wants to be friends with the trail and Obama wants to talk to it.
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  12. #12
    Team Inflexible
    Reputation: Jaydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,943

    I Heart Dave Phillips

    Thanks for posting the links please keep them up. I am riding this with 20- 30 of my joe blow buddies tonight. We are tuning our Next and Pacifica bikes as we speak.

    Colorado Springs riding is now destroyed forever.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SylentK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    971
    I think Phillips has a good point in the fact that the trail is on a map, so the whole illegal/public thing is debateable.

    But, as a gravity guy, I feel for the DH'ers who maintain "their" trail and its secret, only to see a piece on it written up for the public to see. I'd be pissed too.

    If all of us gravity types would stop building super secret stashes to satisfy themselves and start coming together as a community, and get legitimate, legal gnar trails, this type of stuff might dissappear. Canada did it. Why can't we? Eh?
    Biker? I don't even know her.

  14. #14
    Team Inflexible
    Reputation: Jaydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,943
    truthfully George W has blockaded the entire south side of the springs to prevent riders from approaching this top secret trail. I would remove all links before the CIA breaks down your door.

    http://outdoors.coloradosprings.com/...ils.php?id=106 oops

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reporterkyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    473
    Crosspost from the other thread on this story:

    Bashing the reporter, who genuinely seems like a proponent of MTB, is to engage in a kind of localism/territorialism that reflects poorly on mountain biking and mountain bikers. It's really too bad if that is what MTBing is degenerating to on the Front Range, though I guess it is a predictable trend. The only ones who end up looking like "poop stains" are folks doing damage to the feel-good vibe that generally permeates the sport.

  16. #16
    Colorado
    Reputation: Drop the Seat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    452
    This is perhaps the most insane trail in the region -- an old route thatís been on local maps for decades, and may date back to the era of the stagecoach, it has been co-opted by mountain bikers who have added jumps and other stunts.

    To Get There: From I-25 take exit 138,, Circle Drive. Go west on Circle Drive until it becomes Lake Avenue. At the foot of the Broadmoor hotel, go left around a traffic circle onto Lake Circle, which becomes Portales Road. Veer right onto Mirada Road, which raps to the west, becoming West Cheyenne Mountain Boulevard, then Old Stage Road. Where Old Stage turns to dirt, reset your odometer. Drive just over 3.8 miles to a small pull-off on the right next to a U.S. Forest Service regulations sign. Park here.

    Trip Log: Insanely technical and steep. 5.1 miles, 1,540 feet elevation gain.

    The Hike: This ride begins with a grueling pedal up Old Stage Road. Ride just over two miles up the road to a junction with Gold Camp Road. Turn right. Follow the road as it contours gently down and around to the north, then west. After a sharp turn to the northeast, just under four miles from the start, the road climbs slightly. Follow bike tracks to an unmarked trail cutting off to the right. Prepare yourself. A narrow singletrack plunges through the woods. The trail is often rocky and narrow. Only experienced cyclists (with health insurance) should even attempt it. At 4.5 miles the trail passes two wrecked cars that have been rusting in the forest for decades. Here is the trailís crux. Someone has built a 10-foot gap jump here, followed by a steep turn and a rock drop. Even walking it is difficult. Imagining riders who can tackle these stunts is both impressive and terrifying. From there, the trail continues down, over several smaller jumps and berms, rock gardens, and other bruise-inducing features. It empties out on Old Stage Road just uphill from the parking area.

    Details: Notes: Not recommended for hikers, dogs, horses or most mountain bikers.

    Dogs: no

    Rating: 4 Boots A scale of one to four boots. One is easiest, with little elevation gain, and it is at a reasonable altitude. Four is most difficult, with severe elevation gain, difficult terrain or extreme length or altitude.

    Region: Cheyenne Mtn/Canyon

    Great for: biking




  17. #17
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Pabs
    Wouldn't it be better for everyone to have a properly sanctioned trail to exist safely into the future for us and future users, as opposed to a secret one?
    Definitely - I just don't believe that this sort of thing takes us any closer to that end. It strikes me as a case of "look how cool I am".

    I'm all for good public trails, and have no problem throwing dirt to see it happen, but the fact of the matter is that efforts thus far have proven woefully inadequate for the majority of (serious) DH types. While I'll readily admit that I am not directly involved in negotiations for these sort of public trails, it would appear that the biggest obstacle is not manpower, but liability. I just don't see public (not for profit) DH trails with big features happening around here anytime soon. Under these circumstances, it makes sense that those in the DH community would chafe at the thought of "their" trails being thrust into the public eye by anyone, let alone some schmuck who in all likelihood has never so much as brushed a twig from said trail(s).
    Now with more vitriol!

  18. #18
    Colorado
    Reputation: Drop the Seat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    452
    If anyone wants to ride this SUPER SICKY GNAR TRAIL with me I'll be there this weekend with my NEXT.

    I just bought some DH tires and a full face, so I'm not worried.

    Seriously, get real to the people who said remove links to site. If anyone wants to go there they can search for it, but now they don't have to.

    There are "hidden" trails all over this country, and while I've never ridden this I-35, I would place a large bet that it isn't that big of a deal compared to many other "hidden" and "non-hidden" trails.

    **** it, how many people on a Mountain Bike forum are going to go c-u-n-t up this trail anyway... I doubt many if any at all.

  19. #19
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by SylentK
    If all of us gravity types would stop building super secret stashes to satisfy themselves and start coming together as a community, and get legitimate, legal gnar trails, this type of stuff might dissappear. Canada did it. Why can't we? Eh?
    Part of my probelm with criticism of Phillips is that we're talking about public land, which, last time I checked, was owned by everyone. If you really want complete control over a trail and to make it as gnar as you want, pay up and do it on private land.
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  20. #20
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by Godzilla
    Definitely - I just don't believe that this sort of thing takes us any closer to that end. It strikes me as a case of "look how cool I am".

    I'm all for good public trails, and have no problem throwing dirt to see it happen, but the fact of the matter is that efforts thus far have proven woefully inadequate for the majority of (serious) DH types. While I'll readily admit that I am not directly involved in negotiations for these sort of public trails, it would appear that the biggest obstacle is not manpower, but liability. I just don't see public (not for profit) DH trails with big features happening around here anytime soon. Under these circumstances, it makes sense that those in the DH community would chafe at the thought of "their" trails being thrust into the public eye by anyone, let alone some schmuck who in all likelihood has never so much as brushed a twig from said trail(s).
    I don't know Phiilips, so I can't even guess at his motivations.

    However, like I mentioned in another post, it's hard for me to feel bad for DH guys with secret trails because this is public land. If you can more or less do whatever you want on private land. I understand that's economically pretty difficult, but that's our legal system.

    They also had success in the Junk with the Free Lunch Loop, didn't they? And there are ski resorts.

    Here's a piece on public land liability. http://www.imba.com/resources/manage..._immunity.html Private land liability is different and, if I'm not mistaken, the Legislature has passed laws to protect private landowners from fools that hurt themselves.

    I find it somewhat hard to believe that liability is really that big of an issue considering the proliferation of skateparks.
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SylentK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Pabs
    Part of my probelm with criticism of Phillips is that we're talking about public land, which, last time I checked, was owned by everyone. If you really want complete control over a trail and to make it as gnar as you want, pay up and do it on private land.
    I think you're missing my point.
    Biker? I don't even know her.

  22. #22
    nice marmot.
    Reputation: ictoacoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    165
    From what I can tell, the trail has existed for awhile. I get that these guys put some man hours into it and don't want to see it get shut down, but thats the risk you take. I have spent many hours digging dirt jumps over the course of my life, only to see them eventually get plowed or ruined by other riders. In some cases, I've spent 10X more time working a spot than riding it. It happens. Its the risk you take. Get over it.

  23. #23
    !Vamos, flaco!
    Reputation: Pabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by SylentK
    I think you're missing my point.
    I see your point that the dh community should come to getther, unify and build legal trails, mooting the issue.

    I was just pondering a tangential thought.
    "Fact is only what you believe; fact and fiction work as a team." Jack Johnson

  24. #24
    Rolling
    Reputation: lidarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,110
    Hey you people who want the links deleted, start posting things that violate the rules and Francis will take care of it for you!

    Otherwise, the more you post, the more you keep it at the top=more views.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pabs
    I see your point that the dh community should come to getther, unify and build legal trails, mooting the issue. .
    Hold on there....It is a legal trail. It's that it's not secret anymore is the DH communities beef at the moment. Appears exclusivity is the real issue. Any "known" legal trails will have a fundamental problem that they are known.

    Quote Originally Posted by Godzilla
    ... Say, ever wonder why there aren't more of us aggro types bombing the shite out of trails like Apex? Think it might have something to do with the existence of more appropriate spots? ...
    So do you think now that the trail is known, it changes the trail from being an "appropriate" spot to DH?

  25. #25
    Stand back
    Reputation: dbabuser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Godzilla
    Yeah - what an aggro downhiller, the nerve of some people. Say, ever wonder why there aren't more of us aggro types bombing the shite out of trails like Apex? Think it might have something to do with the existence of more appropriate spots? Nah, couldn't be.
    When did you become an aggro type? Did you get a bunch of muscle shirts for x-mas?
    Golden Bike Park

    Golden Connector Trails need your support!

  26. #26
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Pabs
    I don't know Phiilips, so I can't even guess at his motivations.

    However, like I mentioned in another post, it's hard for me to feel bad for DH guys with secret trails because this is public land. If you can more or less do whatever you want on private land. I understand that's economically pretty difficult, but that's our legal system.

    They also had success in the Junk with the Free Lunch Loop, didn't they? And there are ski resorts.

    Here's a piece on public land liability. http://www.imba.com/resources/manage..._immunity.html Private land liability is different and, if I'm not mistaken, the Legislature has passed laws to protect private landowners from fools that hurt themselves.

    I find it somewhat hard to believe that liability is really that big of an issue considering the proliferation of skateparks.
    You make several good points - but in the end the real question is "Why?". I have a hard time believing that publicity like this (Phillips piece) does anything to help the cycling community as a whole.

    Pirate trails are not that hard to find if you really look - they're stumbled across all the time by people who would be better off leaving them alone. The issue I take with this whole thing is that Phillips, in writing his piece, has shown complete disregard for an entire section of the cycling community. I realize that many will take issue with this, but in a sense he gave away something that he had no business giving away, and then had the audacity to ridicule a reader who called him on it, that is what I find so offensive about the whole thing.
    Now with more vitriol!

  27. #27
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by dbabuser
    When did you become an aggro type? Did you get a bunch of muscle shirts for x-mas?
    I'm tearing off the sleeves of my Slayer tee as I type this.
    Now with more vitriol!

  28. #28
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,025

    Basic concepts shouldn't be hard folks..

    Quote Originally Posted by lidarman
    So do you think now that the trail is known, it changes the trail from being an "appropriate" spot to DH?
    It's a dangerous trail for less experienced bikers.. Posting the trail online = more riders of varying skill levels on the trail = more risk of someone getting hurt = higher risk of trail being closed or sanitized.

  29. #29
    Your retarded
    Reputation: Nickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,085
    I'm a little surprised that the ornery few are okay with the links staying. Here's why.

    Let's say the existence of this trail continues to be broadcast publicly. It is a public trail that exists on old maps, so why not, right? Now lets say that the USFS, who has up until this point has been understanding of its existence, decides that while it wasn't too advanced for the old group of builders and riders, it is too advanced for the general public. Let's be honest, it is. So, the USFS destroys all the features and closes the trail. No skin off all our backs, but that must suck for the evil DHers, right? Well, it will suck for us too because the small supply that was keeping DHers off multiuse trails around these parts just got eliminated. And trail riders like us are going to share our multi use, high user density single track with a group that is only increasing in size and following.

    So F the "let's protect the DHer" logic and adopt the "let's protect our beloved trails from increased user density with more diversity" logic.
    A trail thatís too difficult wouldnít exist because itíd never be used. But, trails can exist thatíre too difficult for you.

  30. #30
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by lidarman

    So do you think now that the trail is known, it changes the trail from being an "appropriate" spot to DH?
    Possibly - as traffic increases, suitability for high speed runs decreases. Apex would be fine and dandy, if a little boring, were it not for the insane amounts of traffic it gets.
    Now with more vitriol!

  31. #31
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickle
    I'm a little surprised that the ornery few are okay with the links staying. Here's why.

    Let's say the existence of this trail continues to be broadcast publicly. It is a public trail that exists on old maps, so why not, right? Now lets say that the USFS, who has up until this point has been understanding of its existence, decides that while it wasn't too advanced for the old group of builders and riders, it is too advanced for the general public. Let's be honest, it is. So, the USFS destroys all the features and closes the trail. No skin off all our backs, but that must suck for the evil DHers, right? Well, it will suck for us too because the small supply that was keeping DHers off multiuse trails around these parts just got eliminated. And trail riders like us are going to share our multi use, high user density single track with a group that is only increasing in size and following.

    So F the "let's protect the DHer" logic and adopt the "let's protect our beloved trails from increased user density with more diversity" logic.
    Exactly.
    Now with more vitriol!

  32. #32
    Team Inflexible
    Reputation: Jaydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Nickle
    I'm a little surprised that the ornery few are okay with the links staying. Here's why.

    Let's say the existence of this trail continues to be broadcast publicly. It is a public trail that exists on old maps, so why not, right? Now lets say that the USFS, who has up until this point has been understanding of its existence, decides that while it wasn't too advanced for the old group of builders and riders, it is too advanced for the general public. Let's be honest, it is. So, the USFS destroys all the features and closes the trail. No skin off all our backs, but that must suck for the evil DHers, right? Well, it will suck for us too because the small supply that was keeping DHers off multiuse trails around these parts just got eliminated. And trail riders like us are going to share our multi use, high user density single track with a group that is only increasing in size and following.

    So F the "let's protect the DHer" logic and adopt the "let's protect our beloved trails from increased user density with more diversity" logic.
    IMO I am very ok with locations and trail descriptions being posted on this site. Last time I checked, the forums on MTBR are a great place to collobrate, learn about new rides and peoples mountain bike experiences. Maybe Denver has a bigger issue but the Springs is a different story. We have a smaller community with a ton more riding. I have lived here for 35 years and still find new places to ride. USFS closing trails in the area seems to me a bit of a paranoid delusion. I can see them taking down features that could be deemed hazardous such as some of the wooden features on pipeline, but closing whole trails seems a far stretch. If anything new trails are being added every year.

    Rider density has not been an issue to me either. I see more hikers and motos than mountain bikers anyway. I enjoy sharing my knowledge of the area and not only that there are a ton of websites, books, and maps to get to know the region.

    How about sharing instead of being trail Nazis? "no soup for you!"
    Last edited by Jaydude; 05-29-2008 at 12:47 PM.

  33. #33
    skillz to pay billz
    Reputation: nOOby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,554
    IMO people should find these trails on their own or by word of mouth. No sense in broadcasting it via the media. Where is the sense of discovery in that? Certainly some less experienced rider is going to go there and hurt themselves, in turn threatening the future of some rare DH runs.

  34. #34
    Shoulda went faster
    Reputation: nomad rdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by Martlet
    is NOT happy with Mr. Philips' latest writeup:

    http://gazetteoutthere.blogspot.com/...are-angry.html

    While I can understand he might have been a little peeved about "his" trail being publicized, this kind of response does nobody any good.

    And what good are you doing putting up a post like this?

  35. #35
    Rolling
    Reputation: lidarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,110
    I agree with all the posts supporting keeping it secret and the problems with goof-balls showing up due to this getting out.. I know first hand from some cool stashes in Moab that I have ridden on with some local which I won't name but polly most people know him. Trails like Rockstacker have suffered the same fate in word getting out but it really didn't affect the ride quality in the end.

    Stash trails get discovered and that is part of the game. You milk the sucker and and accept the fact or move on when word gets out.

    I guess the point is, since it is a public trail and not a sanctioned DH only trail, you have to live with the fact that it's discovered and yes Dave Pillipps putting it in the Gazette did come across as "Hey look I rode a super hard trail that I could barely walk and here is where you can find it. Oh and those bikers (since I'm not one) are angry for me publishing it, hey look again." His review was kinda out of his scope.

    But most stash trails do get discovered by word of mouth anyway. Surprised this one lasted as long as it did. Rockstacker in Moab was never published anywhere, but it's the most popular trail that nobody knows about.

    I can't wait to get those PMs asking me where rockstacker is! ...cuz I forgot.
    Last edited by lidarman; 05-28-2008 at 06:58 PM.

  36. #36
    Your retarded
    Reputation: Nickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,085
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaydude
    ...I have lived here for 35 years and still find new places to ride. USFS closing trails in the area seems to me a bit of a paranoid delusion. I can see them taking down features that could be deemed hazardous... but closing whole trails seems a far stretch.
    Okay, maybe you are correct, Jay. Let's revise my previous post and say that the USFS steps in and sanatises the trail of all features that define this to be what it currently is. Even if that occurs, the above logic still holds true. The supply for trails of this nature will be eliminated and its riders will overflow to more easily accessible trails. I doubt many will continue to drive all that way just to ride a trail they can ride in their backyard.

    Liderman, I can't argue with your logic, it's fairly accurate. However, you can make an effort to minimize the reprocussions once a stash has been busted. And that is why I requested that those who have linked and copied the article and blog to remove that content. I request that again.
    A trail thatís too difficult wouldnít exist because itíd never be used. But, trails can exist thatíre too difficult for you.

  37. #37
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaydude
    IMO I am very ok with locations and trail descriptions being posted on this site...

    How about sharing instead of being trail Nazis? "no soup for you!"
    How many of these type trails have you put time into - you know, building jumps, drops, berms and such?

    I don't expect an answer given that this is a public forum, but I'd be willing to bet that your time spent moving dirt and rocks is nil, given your cavalier attitude toward the matter. It's all good to "share the love" - until it's you who finds his favorite stash has been closed as a direct result of somebody shooting his mouth off.
    Now with more vitriol!

  38. #38
    skillz to pay billz
    Reputation: nOOby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,554
    the references to localism are unfounded. Until people are shuttling with razor blades taped to their bars and slashing tires at the trailhead lets just call the need to keep things hush hush common sense.

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dhpimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by SylentK
    I think Phillips has a good point in the fact that the trail is on a map, so the whole illegal/public thing is debateable.

    But, as a gravity guy, I feel for the DH'ers who maintain "their" trail and its secret, only to see a piece on it written up for the public to see. I'd be pissed too.

    If all of us gravity types would stop building super secret stashes to satisfy themselves and start coming together as a community, and get legitimate, legal gnar trails, this type of stuff might dissappear. Canada did it. Why can't we? Eh?
    Canada didn't do it... the difference is in Canada you could get away with building trails because of 2 things - 1) law suits about people hurting themselves in a sport that they decided to engage in [with inherent risks] gets thrown out of court, and 2) they do not have the BLM/USFS monitoring the trails as harshly as we do here.

    I personally would rather this trail not get published, but now that it is I am hoping that someone doesn't get hurt and once they do ride it they realize it not for small bikes and beginner/intermediate riders.

  40. #40
    It's Scotch/Romanian
    Reputation: john cocktoastin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    29
    Wasn't there a video posted a while back with the Yeti guys riding this "super secret" trail?

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SylentK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by dhpimp
    Canada didn't do it... the difference is in Canada you could get away with building trails because of 2 things - 1) law suits about people hurting themselves in a sport that they decided to engage in [with inherent risks] gets thrown out of court, and 2) they do not have the BLM/USFS monitoring the trails as harshly as we do here.

    I personally would rather this trail not get published, but now that it is I am hoping that someone doesn't get hurt and once they do ride it they realize it not for small bikes and beginner/intermediate riders.
    You're right on your two points. And that def helps CAN in their trail building situation. But the point I wanted to make was that the mountain bikers in CAN formed some kind of organization that fought for their trails. They faced closure of trails from the authorities just like we do. I'm not sure of the details, but according to a nice local from Pemberton that I rode with, you can build trails of any kind in certain places. Then, once its "burned in" and the people accept it, the mtb organization adopts it and maintains it for everyone! (something like that)

    Yes, we have a lot more gov red tape to cut through, but we aren't going to get the network of trails like CAN has if we keep building up our own personal stash of trails. But I guess it is a short term solution...until it reaches a critical mass and then DH will either be outlawed or accepted. I vote for the latter.

    So who wants to shuttle "I-35" this weekend!?
    Last edited by SylentK; 05-29-2008 at 09:51 AM.
    Biker? I don't even know her.

  42. #42
    Stand back
    Reputation: dbabuser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,158
    Uh, CA = California
    CAN = Canada...
    Or don't they have enough Californians in SFSD for you to have to specify that up there?
    Golden Bike Park

    Golden Connector Trails need your support!

  43. #43
    Living the High Life
    Reputation: Ithnu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,535
    I wanted to jump in here for those who say that "Free Lunch in Grand Junction was done as a public DH trail, why can't we do it everywhere?"

    There was an interview in Decline with one of the people who helped make that trail happen. It took them 5 years of forms, paperwork, and finally construction.

    Hear that? 5 years! Its not that easy to just put in a public DH trail, its awesome they did it, but have some respect and understanding.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jugdish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,244
    Quote Originally Posted by thump
    It's a dangerous trail for less experienced bikers.. Posting the trail online = more riders of varying skill levels on the trail = more risk of someone getting hurt = higher risk of trail being closed or sanitized.
    I don't have a dog in this fight but... Halls could be "a dangerous trail for less experienced bikers". Hell, I've seen new riders that make bike paths appear dangerous. Just my thoughts, carry on.
    Gone are the days we stopped to decide,
    Where we should go,
    We just ride...

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bike21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    426
    Not to worry. As soon as I win the lottery, I will open a full on freeride/DH/dirt jump park on the Front Range and everyone will have a legit place to play.

    Or if I don't win the lottery, perhaps someone knows of some potential investors?

  46. #46
    post-ride specialist
    Reputation: icegeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,010
    Quote Originally Posted by lidarman
    Hey you people who want the links deleted, start posting things that violate the rules and Francis will take care of it for you!
    ...

    I heard somewhere that Ibex Bikes were in fact not the best bikes in the world.



    (There, that should get us all banned. He77, maybe they'll even shut down F=70)
    Since when did Need have anything to do with this?

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reporterkyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by nOOby
    the references to localism are unfounded. Until people are shuttling with razor blades taped to their bars and slashing tires at the trailhead lets just call the need to keep things hush hush common sense.
    I would disagree. I think it does smack of localism. You've got some guys essentially threatening the guy who wrote the story about I-35. That's crappy, that's localism. A lot of the comments in this thread have the same vibe. MTBing is generally devoid of that kind of feel. I would also argue that you can't blame some local reporter for ruining a secret trail, that honor goes to the guys who kept telling their buddies about it. Face it, that kind of stuff happens. It starts with, "You can't take anybody else here," moves along to "just bring a couple of bros that won't talk about it" and they tell their friends and then the secret spot isn't a secret anymore.

  48. #48
    skillz to pay billz
    Reputation: nOOby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,554
    As far as I can tell nobody threatened bodily harm accept to say 'if you ride this without the proper skills you will hurt yourself'. 'Threatening' and 'asking WTF' are two different things IMO.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Reporterkyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by nOOby
    As far as I can tell nobody threatened bodily harm accept to say 'if you ride this without the proper skills you will hurt yourself'. 'Threatening' and 'asking WTF' are two different things IMO.
    I don't know, he's been called "the devil," a "poop stain" and has apparently "ruined Colorado Springs." Of course, this from the downhiller he noted on the blog: "P.S. be carefull the next shop you drop your bike off to, may forget to tighten all the bolts, beacause most of the mechanics in town ride DH." I'd generally call all of those comments threatening and steeped in territorialism/localism.

  50. #50
    Gaa-zee-raaaa!
    Reputation: Godzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Reporterkyle
    I don't know, he's been called "the devil," a "poop stain" and has apparently "ruined Colorado Springs." Of course, this from the downhiller he noted on the blog: "P.S. be carefull the next shop you drop your bike off to, may forget to tighten all the bolts, beacause most of the mechanics in town ride DH." I'd generally call all of those comments threatening and steeped in territorialism/localism.
    He is a devilish poop stain, and there are many good examples of territorialism going on.

    Where's the problem?

    It's like some of you are clinging to this idea that the world should be a fair, safe and inclusive place. It isn't. People have been watching out for their own interests since the beginning of time. Honestly, I find it odd that so many are surprised by this.

    It's NOT a matter of "better than thou" or anything of the sort - the idea here can be summed up in one line:

    "Show, don't tell."

    Phillips should know better than to behave like such a poop stain.


    FWIW - the person who accused him of doing more harm than good in the CS cycling community is not a downhiller.
    Now with more vitriol!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •