Results 1 to 46 of 46
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    327

    Documenting the Undocumented

    Strava... causes for some; for others; for many..
    I'm in the category... have been for years..

    Full disclosure complete..

    I've also made it a point to create segments for unmapped trails.

    I'm sure that may piss a bunch of you off... sorry...

    My rational is supply and demand. Specifically, the more quantitative usage data that is available to trail advocacy groups, then the sounder arguments they should be able to make to either "legalize" or expand trail networks.

    Based on the forum typical rhetoric (trails are too wide, people don't yield, etc, etc) the Front range is similar to the bay area in that there are lots of people how love to ride, but have insufficient places to do so.

    An issue compounded by land management groups who think "mountain biking" is best done on a fire road that has been freshly graded to 60" wide and at an incline of no more than 3%, you know, for our own safety. it's not a very good starting point for negotiations.

    In other words, if a segment is ridden say 500 times in 3 months, one would have a pretty solid argument that there is significant demand for the section of trail.

    Lastly... Strava is a fantastic trip planning tool.
    By creating the segment I do, I can see how other people are linking trails and also to check on the popularity of other trails in a given area.
    If you ever find yourself someplace new and don't know where to start, start with Strava it beats much of the advice I see given here.

    anyway... thoughts, flames, negative props...?

    Black Forerunner with California Plates riding a white Nomad in Winter Park this weekend... that would be me...

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    Don't map in the unmapped trails in Winter Park! Just messing around. I think it is a valuable tool to share good rides with people. I could care less about racing anyone!

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  3. #3
    Almost Human
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,530
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    I've made it a point to create segments for unmapped trails.
    anyway... thoughts, flames, negative props...?

    Seriously. Why not... just go ride?

    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    in Winter Park this weekend
    ...I'll call WP and tell them to be be on the lookout 4u!


  4. #4
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,024
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    anyway... thoughts, flames, negative props...?
    You're basing all this on the premise that getting lots of people to ride a trail will help get it formalized? Brilliant!

    You may want to get involved in an legit trail building effort so you can see how the process works.

    Your approach does do a good job of giving hikers and equestrians more ammo to complain about to USFS though.

    Strava on..

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rogbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,253
    The converse is, of course, that groups that want to limit or remove mountain biking from trails will use the evidence that cyclists are riding on unapproved trails.

    "That which has a front has a back"

  6. #6
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKook View Post
    Black Forerunner with California Plates riding a white Nomad in Winter Park

  7. #7
    t.i.t.s.ceo/FR amoeba rep
    Reputation: PBR me!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post

    Black Forerunner with California Plates riding a white Nomad in Winter Park this weekend... that would be me...
    ha maybe im old school- i was referred to as a "forerunner"as one who pre-ran a slalom or giant slalom course on the mtn! and who admits to having california plates? unless your a chick?
    I'm a cowboy on a steel horse i ride!

    the blog

  8. #8
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by PBR me! View Post
    and who admits to having california plates? unless your a chick?
    a wilbur kookmeyer would ! A lot can be said about mtbr handles.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    421
    typical mtbr fashion no one will answer his question because the moron went ahead and mentioned he's from california

    I'll answer your question.

    GPS files of rides really don't do much harm on the grand scheme of things.

    Mapping documenting and publicly releasing trails that are not ridden much probably not a good idea. It helps keep them hidden. Why would you want to see a hundred people on an unused trail?

    The same goes for backcountry skiing, you once saw no one back country skiing now everyone is a backcountry skiier. When your the first one out breaking trail you have to remember to make some sucker tracks to throw people off or persuade them that this is too technical and they should turn around now. The same goes for mtb.

    Where I live it seems we loose one trail a year that was unridden, hidden, or what not. There are still a few of these trails around but they number fewer and fewer each summer. I just rode one the other day, it's always nice when you can hit some single track that is still six inches wide and barely used.

    Why GPS doesn't matter

    In my situation GPS is just one of the many forces that are leading people onto once unused trails. The town of Breckenridge is printing maps and selling them. They are promoting the use of trails. They are labeling trails. All which are the same as publishing a GPS of a ride.

    The biggest cause of trail use is race promoters using the trails for their personal gain. Trails that are used for races are usually the most damaged and overused where I live. People download the race map and follow the course. Some of these trails only saw a handfull of people in one season years ago, they are now used by thousands over the course of a summer. Heavily used and heavily damaged.


    It's always nice when you can truely get away and out there, but it's getting harder and harder to do. I used to enjoy getting lost and ending up on some goat trail for a couple hours, but now that's becoming harder and harder to do.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    464
    I'm 100% certain that no one gives a s**t about my opinion but with this many people and mountain bikers specifically the need to just STFU about unknown or lesser known trails is greater. The internet spraylord culture is something I don't think I'll ever understand so to me it's just people trying to boost their egos, once again that's just my opinion.

    I don't have a problem with people taking GPS files and giving them to friends but Strava and other things make it too easy for the lowest common denominator riders to find trails. It also takes the adventure out of it but we're all out there for different reasons so to each their own. These are people who don't have the knowledge and in some cases don't care about who has come before them and what these people have done to make/maintain the trails.

    I wonder if the people who post lesser known trails feel better about themselves, like their helping, or if they just don't care? How do the builders of rogue trails feel about telling people 10-15 years ago now that the real effect of that is being seen? In hindsight would they change what they did, not just Ned but the whole Front Range.

    Honestly I think mtbr and this forum specifically unfortunately doesn't represent the Front Range mountain bikers as a whole. Most of the riders here are considerate and well versed on the issues that we face as a user group.

    I don't think the forest circus sees undocumented trails as a reason to build more trails but I may be wrong.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wilsonblur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,212
    OP-we have a higher than average number of trolls on the FR forum and its unlikely that you get any real helpful input for a couple of reasons. Elitism, Elitism, Elitism

    Myths that we all buy into:

    1. Everyone thinks its everyone else who is wrecking all the great pristine singletrack and that they have no impact on what they ride. This is a myth, all of us have an impact on what we ride.
    2. Only locals and an elite few have the right to ride these trails so don't bother applying if you are the lowest common denominator, moved in from out of state, or from the wrong riding discipline because you don't deserve to ride "their" trails. The problem again is that everyone not like us is ineligible to ride. Anyone who has the initiative to find the trails that are legal has a right to ride them.
    3. There's a huge difference between unmapped and illegal. Winter Park even encourages you to come and ride their huge and vastly undiscovered network of trails so we can't make a huge fuss if they are asking us to come out and ride it. Make sure what you're riding is legal and not private. Most people won't venture this far out to ride so there's very little to worry about with over usage. The myth here is that anything you do will lead to us losing the right to ride Winter Park for instance has only blossomed under what you are doing.
    4. That increased usage automatically turns everything into 60" gravel highways. Look at high usage places like Moab, Fruita, GJ, Pigsah etc. More riders mean more money to service trails and doesn't automatically lead to gravel path hell. More money for advocacy and more trails open to riders, more MTB specific trails, better built more sustainable trails, better local groups educating and policing riders etc. Its not a given conclusion that this is where things are headed.
    5. That things are always better in the past, its called the historical fallacy. Change is always present and its what we fight against most even though we can't stop it. The common assumption is that things were better before.... and fill in the blank, before those people moved here, before full suspension, before all these people started riding my trail etc. See number 1, the more we individually ride, the more we have an impact. Its not just everyone else that contributed to the change we all did. Change is often for the better and sometimes not. We have more bike specific riding than every before and better education and advocacy than anytime in history. In most places you aren't sharing the trail with moto riders and that in and of itself is huge. Many of the trails that these guys are thinking of weren't built well in the first place and aren't sustainable even without higher usage.

    There are still many challenges to face in land management and keeping certain groups from creating illegal new trails or damaging the work of others. But if we all think the problem is outside of us and divide ourselves into micro factions we'll never survive.
    Narrow is the path to life, few are those who find it.

  12. #12
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by wilsonblur View Post
    Myths that I buy into:
    speak for yourself

  13. #13
    Almost Human
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,530
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    anyway... thoughts, flames, negative props...?
    OK WilburKookmeyer so I have a few more minutes today.

    Here's the deal for me. Land Managers don't have the time, energy or
    desire to search Strava to see how many people are riding a social trail.
    They have too much other crap to deal with. Like who didn't show up for
    work today, or putting out fires.

    And... Unless 100% of trail users are using strava to log their rides/hikes
    /runs, it really tells me nothing except a bunch of racer boiyz on MTB's are
    riding where they shouldn't be. It's worthless data.

    Honestly... If I'm a LM. I don't want to know if you are riding it and I
    definitely don't want it on the Internet. It makes me look bad to my boss
    and the public. Like I'm not doing a very good job.

    There are many reasons some of those social trails you're mapping may not
    be official.
    1. Might be on private property.
    2. No money to close it. (most likely)
    3. May encroash on plant or wildlife habitat. Like elk calving areas or
    wetlands/riparian habitat(also very likely).
    4. Might actually be a game, or livestock trail.
    5. It hasn't been found by land managers.
    etc...

    As a land manager, or land steward if you will, my job is to maintain/manage
    land and promote responsible use of resources. I'm going to check my
    property every week and when I see tire tracks going somewhere I don't
    want them to, then guess who get's put on the ***** list?

    There is no "oh a bunch of people use this trail, I need to open it" going
    on. I'm sure there are exceptions, but generally speaking that's not how
    land management works.

    If something isn't official, it's probably not official for a reason. I'm going to
    close it.

    Here's what my (imaginary) staff tells me when I ask them if they check out
    Strava:

    "Strava? Are those the endangered fish they found in Bear Creek?"
    "We went there on vacation last year. It was hot."
    "I can't take care of the trails I already have, I need a bigger budget... and
    a raise."
    "Our GPS is broke. We don't have any money to fix it."
    "Yup. Just print me a map and we'll go close it down... again."

    As MTBR's we have to realize that we can be good land stewards also. I
    don't care if you ride those trails. We all have poached at some point in
    time to see where some trail goes. It happens.

    But turning a social trail into a training route on Strava opens up a whole
    new can of worms. It's just not good for MTB'ng and trail access. It sends
    the message that "we don't care".

    I'm not saying you shouldn't put it on Strava if you feel like it. But maybe
    you shouldn't be creating segments and advertising it? That's where the
    line is for me.

    Just my 2 cents. Have a nice day.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    310


    Ride 'em while you got 'em!

  15. #15
    Biker Rider/Beer Drinker
    Reputation: CharlyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleTrail View Post
    OK WilburKookmeyer so I have a few more minutes today.

    Here's the deal for me. Land Managers don't have the time, energy or
    desire to search Strava to see how many people are riding a social trail.
    They have too much other crap to deal with. Like who didn't show up for
    work today, or putting out fires.

    And... Unless 100% of trail users are using strava to log their rides/hikes
    /runs, it really tells me nothing except a bunch of racer boiyz on MTB's are
    riding where they shouldn't be. It's worthless data.

    Honestly... If I'm a LM. I don't want to know if you are riding it and I
    definitely don't want it on the Internet. It makes me look bad to my boss
    and the public. Like I'm not doing a very good job.

    There are many reasons some of those social trails you're mapping may not
    be official.
    1. Might be on private property.
    2. No money to close it. (most likely)
    3. May encroash on plant or wildlife habitat. Like elk calving areas or
    wetlands/riparian habitat(also very likely).
    4. Might actually be a game, or livestock trail.
    5. It hasn't been found by land managers.
    etc...

    As a land manager, or land steward if you will, my job is to maintain/manage
    land and promote responsible use of resources. I'm going to check my
    property every week and when I see tire tracks going somewhere I don't
    want them to, then guess who get's put on the ***** list?

    There is no "oh a bunch of people use this trail, I need to open it" going
    on. I'm sure there are exceptions, but generally speaking that's not how
    land management works.

    If something isn't official, it's probably not official for a reason. I'm going to
    close it.

    Here's what my (imaginary) staff tells me when I ask them if they check out
    Strava:

    "Strava? Are those the endangered fish they found in Bear Creek?"
    "We went there on vacation last year. It was hot."
    "I can't take care of the trails I already have, I need a bigger budget... and
    a raise."
    "Our GPS is broke. We don't have any money to fix it."
    "Yup. Just print me a map and we'll go close it down... again."

    As MTBR's we have to realize that we can be good land stewards also. I
    don't care if you ride those trails. We all have poached at some point in
    time to see where some trail goes. It happens.

    But turning a social trail into a training route on Strava opens up a whole
    new can of worms. It's just not good for MTB'ng and trail access. It sends
    the message that "we don't care".

    I'm not saying you shouldn't put it on Strava if you feel like it. But maybe
    you shouldn't be creating segments and advertising it? That's where the
    line is for me.

    Just my 2 cents. Have a nice day.
    Well put.

  16. #16
    killin clear creek
    Reputation: backcountryislife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by thump View Post
    You're basing all this on the premise that getting lots of people to ride a trail will help get it formalized? Brilliant!

    You may want to get involved in an legit trail building effort so you can see how the process works.

    Your approach does do a good job of giving hikers and equestrians more ammo to complain about to USFS though.

    Strava on..
    I agree with the redneck.

    Oh yeah... UT said it well too

    I thought this was going to be a thread about illegal Mexicans on bikes... seemed like an interesting topic. WTF is strava?
    Quote Originally Posted by thump View Post
    How about we take the "let it burn approach" with the rotting cesspool of the Denver metro?

  17. #17
    Biker Rider/Beer Drinker
    Reputation: CharlyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleTrail View Post
    OK WilburKookmeyer so I have a few more minutes today.

    Here's the deal for me. Land Managers don't have the time, energy or
    desire to search Strava to see how many people are riding a social trail.
    They have too much other crap to deal with. Like who didn't show up for
    work today, or putting out fires.

    And... Unless 100% of trail users are using strava to log their rides/hikes
    /runs, it really tells me nothing except a bunch of racer boiyz on MTB's are
    riding where they shouldn't be. It's worthless data.

    Honestly... If I'm a LM. I don't want to know if you are riding it and I
    definitely don't want it on the Internet. It makes me look bad to my boss
    and the public. Like I'm not doing a very good job.

    There are many reasons some of those social trails you're mapping may not
    be official.
    1. Might be on private property.
    2. No money to close it. (most likely)
    3. May encroash on plant or wildlife habitat. Like elk calving areas or
    wetlands/riparian habitat(also very likely).
    4. Might actually be a game, or livestock trail.
    5. It hasn't been found by land managers.
    etc...

    As a land manager, or land steward if you will, my job is to maintain/manage
    land and promote responsible use of resources. I'm going to check my
    property every week and when I see tire tracks going somewhere I don't
    want them to, then guess who get's put on the ***** list?

    There is no "oh a bunch of people use this trail, I need to open it" going
    on. I'm sure there are exceptions, but generally speaking that's not how
    land management works.

    If something isn't official, it's probably not official for a reason. I'm going to
    close it.

    Here's what my (imaginary) staff tells me when I ask them if they check out
    Strava:

    "Strava? Are those the endangered fish they found in Bear Creek?"
    "We went there on vacation last year. It was hot."
    "I can't take care of the trails I already have, I need a bigger budget... and
    a raise."
    "Our GPS is broke. We don't have any money to fix it."
    "Yup. Just print me a map and we'll go close it down... again."

    As MTBR's we have to realize that we can be good land stewards also. I
    don't care if you ride those trails. We all have poached at some point in
    time to see where some trail goes. It happens.

    But turning a social trail into a training route on Strava opens up a whole
    new can of worms. It's just not good for MTB'ng and trail access. It sends
    the message that "we don't care".

    I'm not saying you shouldn't put it on Strava if you feel like it. But maybe
    you shouldn't be creating segments and advertising it? That's where the
    line is for me.

    Just my 2 cents. Have a nice day.
    Well put.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    601
    Well said Uncle trial.

    Wilburkookmeyer - Can we assume either you're just visiting Colorado, or you're heading to the DMV today to purchase your Colorado plates for your 4Runner?

  19. #19
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggs View Post
    Wilburkookmeyer - Can we assume either you're just visiting Colorado, or you're heading to the DMV today to purchase your Colorado plates for your 4Skinner?
    On-Blast, right there^

  20. #20
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,024
    Quote Originally Posted by backcountryislife View Post
    WTF is strava?
    It's a website where you can compare how fast you are against the fastest dudes. Of course the actual fastest dudes aren't actually on Strava, so it's really more a dick measuring contest for 97th place.

  21. #21
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by thump View Post
    It's a website where you can compare how fast you are against the fastest dudes. Of course the actual fastest dudes aren't actually on Strava, so it's really more a dick measuring contest for 97th place.
    lulz, perfect

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    9
    I don't think the NF has the $$$ or people to manage a bunch of new trails on the front range if any really, so you thinking that more riders on a specific trail will automitically make it legit is not valid. They will most likely close it down to all user groups.

    Whatever happened to putting in the time and exploring on your own up in the woods looking for that sweet spot off the radar? Sometimes you may find something great, and sometimes you may have to walk your bike 3 miles out of a canyon and never go back there. Hey after all you are spending time on your bike out in nature and that's what matters. Isn't it a good feeling to just randomly find that awesome trail and just know it's there and not have to share it with the world? Most good things come with time and effort and those people that put the time in will most likely respect it more than those who just have things handed to them.

  23. #23
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,130
    Time spent comparing dick sizes on Strava: 4 hours

    Time spent volunteering for trail work: 0 hours




    Strava is really cool.

  24. #24
    Thread Terrorist
    Reputation: IndecentExposure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,847
    Love it. I use starvation to explore new areas. I also use barminess connect as well.
    Golden Bike Park Group

    Peak Cycles Gravity Team & Bikeparts.com
    Trestle Bike Park

  25. #25
    bacon! bacon! bacon!
    Reputation: SkaredShtles's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,642
    Quote Originally Posted by IndecentExposure View Post
    Love it. I use starvation
    Hmmmm...

    Starvation.

    This reminds me... of a good idea.

    Thanks!

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggs View Post
    Well said Uncle trial.

    Wilburkookmeyer - Can we assume either you're just visiting Colorado, or you're heading to the DMV today to purchase your Colorado plates for your 4Runner?
    sorry guys... I'm here to stay... and the plates are on until they expire...


    I do love all assumptions.

    WilsonBlur/UncleTrail thanks for the responses...

    I think UT's point about a Land Manager looking like he not doing his/her job is important, but again assumes the trails I'm referring to are illegal or are in area's where riding is illegal.

    I'm really talking about trails like Broken Spade, Hellies nuts, Leap Frog, IKO, etc...

    but again, thanks for the assumptions, it was enlightening.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    I hate to say it cause I ride those trails all the time but they are illegal trails. You wont get in trouble for riding them cause there is no enforcement by the forest service. I rode hellies yesterday and stravaed the ride. Rode broken spade and iko today and mapped it too. I think strata is great for sharing trails. Go for it. It isn't going to shut down our trails and it is nice for people to find new rides.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  28. #28
    ride
    Reputation: ignazjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,087
    I always thought it was Hayley's nuts. Never heard of a dog named Hellie...
    Redstone Cyclery
    intense*transition*rocky mountain*turner
    web - tweet - FB
    Lyons, CO

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    Heli like a helicopter is how Dougie told me to pronounce it. I like to call it awesome!

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  30. #30
    ride
    Reputation: ignazjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    5,087
    Ah. Story I heard was that it was named after somebody's dog when they were building it. As the story goes, that trail and another one right in there were built by the WP trail crews 15+ years ago when they built everything else on the mountain the first time around. Only they built a couple for themselves...
    Redstone Cyclery
    intense*transition*rocky mountain*turner
    web - tweet - FB
    Lyons, CO

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    Once again this all here say. I heard eye to eye and hellies nuts was built and flagged by a local who has built a ton of our trails. Local group rides and locals burned it in. I have heard hellies was named after a dog also. What's funny is the forest service is doing tree mitigation on ice hill area and our local bike group wanted to make sure all the trails were restored when they were done. The forest service had no idea that eye to eyes and hellies was even there. A rumor I hear is that the ski area wants those trails added to their trail system. We will see what happens with the tree mitigation and saving those trails. They destroyed ice hill and most of that area is blocked off. Upper chickedy eye to eye and hellies nuts are all untouched and in good shape for now.
    Sorry to hijack the thread.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  32. #32
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKook View Post
    sorry guys... I'm here to stay... and the plates are on until they expire...
    FYI:

    Registration Required

    Within sixty days after purchase (42-3-103(1)(a) C.R.S.)
    Within ninety days after becoming a resident of Colorado
    An owner of a foreign vehicle operated within this state (42-3-103(2) C.R.S.)
    Every nonresident person who operates a business within this state and owns and operates in such business any motor vehicle trailer, semi-trailer, or trailer coach (42-3-103(3) C.R.S.)
    Within forty-five days after the owner has returned to the United States (42-3-103(4)(b) C.R.S.)

  33. #33
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,130
    Quote Originally Posted by KarateChicken View Post
    FYI:

    Registration Required

    Within sixty days after purchase (42-3-103(1)(a) C.R.S.)
    Within ninety days after becoming a resident of Colorado
    An owner of a foreign vehicle operated within this state (42-3-103(2) C.R.S.)
    Every nonresident person who operates a business within this state and owns and operates in such business any motor vehicle trailer, semi-trailer, or trailer coach (42-3-103(3) C.R.S.)
    Within forty-five days after the owner has returned to the United States (42-3-103(4)(b) C.R.S.)
    Why did you have to go and tell him? Ticket = moar lulz.

  34. #34
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by Guyechka View Post
    Ticket for davecretin13 = moar lulz.
    Fixed it for ya, echka.

  35. #35
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,024
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    I think UT's point about a Land Manager looking like he not doing his/her job is important, but again assumes the trails I'm referring to are illegal or are in area's where riding is illegal.
    Ummmm....

    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    My rational is supply and demand. Specifically, the more quantitative usage data that is available to trail advocacy groups, then the sounder arguments they should be able to make to either "legalize" or expand trail networks.
    I think the assumption we can all make now is you're a backpedaling tool.

  36. #36
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by thump View Post
    I think the assumption we can all make now is you're a backpedaling tool.
    the fool part was easy at the onset of this thread

    i wonder if his vehicle is registered yet?

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    [QUOTE=
    i wonder if his vehicle is registered yet?[/QUOTE]

    Who gives a f@#k if his car is registered! Let this thread die. At least the guy is out riding good trails and wants to share them with people.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  38. #38
    bacon! bacon! bacon!
    Reputation: SkaredShtles's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,642
    My wife got a ticket 2 *weeks* after she moved here back in '96 for out of state plates.

  39. #39
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by dtimmehs View Post
    Who gives a f@#k if his car is registered!
    The County Clerk and Recorder of the county he resides in. The current law-abiding and taxpaying citizens of that county also have a right to GAF about it.

  40. #40
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,024
    Quote Originally Posted by dtimms View Post
    At least the guy is out riding good trails and wants to share them with people.
    And if you don't have friends to share with then there's Strava.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    All the guy was doing by stating his plates was looking for someone to ride with. He posted that on a mountain bike forum. Your little clic here on Mtbr just needed an excuse to get upset. Come on KC, you have never cheated the law a little? Never rolled a stop sign? I am sure some taxpayer somewhere wants that revenue also. Why can't this forum talk about riding bikes and sharing trails?

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
    When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.

  42. #42
    ..ouch
    Reputation: thump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,024
    Quote Originally Posted by dtimms View Post
    ... stravadork's pity party...
    Quote Originally Posted by WilburKookmeyer View Post
    I've also made it a point to create segments for unmapped trails.

    I'm sure that may piss a bunch of you off... sorry...
    yeah.. the poor guy

  43. #43
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by dtourettes View Post
    Come on KC, you have never cheated the law a little? Never rolled a stop sign?
    why yes and i brag about it all over the internets, as you can plainly see

    /sarcasm

  44. #44
    banned
    Reputation: KarateChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,865
    Quote Originally Posted by thump View Post
    And if you don't have friends to share with then there's Stravego.
    teh lulz, right there^

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gunnirider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    309
    I know if I didn't document trail in my area it would have been much easier for the BLM to close them. In 1999 the BLM recognized only 23 trails at Hartman Rocks, when in fact there was over 40. If I would have produced a map showing only those trails, as directed by the BLM, there is a chance Hartmans would still have only 23 trails. Historical use and documentation helped paved the way to keep most of the trails that are out there today. We did "lose" a few to endangered species and private property, but for the most part we did very well.

    Things are different on the front range I assume. I'm glad I mapped every trail back in the day, the old BLM manager was not, every situation is different.

  46. #46
    Heads up Flyboy!!
    Reputation: mountaingoatepics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,159
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnirider View Post
    I know if I didn't document trail in my area it would have been much easier for the BLM to close them. In 1999 the BLM recognized only 23 trails at Hartman Rocks, when in fact there was over 40. If I would have produced a map showing only those trails, as directed by the BLM, there is a chance Hartmans would still have only 23 trails. Historical use and documentation helped paved the way to keep most of the trails that are out there today. We did "lose" a few to endangered species and private property, but for the most part we did very well. the old BLM manager was not, every situation is different.
    This is how it is in most areas of the country.

    Most of the classic Fruita trails were made by locals long before they were officially recognized.

    The Magnificent 7 in Moab was a user created trail that became established and while a section of the original trail was closed due to sensitive wildlife habitat, it is still a huge win.

    I have also heard of several non sanctioned trails from Wyoming, Montana, and Arizona being established into legitimate trails on National Forest and BLM.

    In Western North Carolina there are several social trails that were established in this manor. There are still several social and "un-documented trails" that the forest service recognizes is there and used by many locals but they turn a blind eye to them, refusing to recognize or close them, also knowing these trails are used regularly by locals.

    There are also situations where the land manager will recognize a trail that was a social trail, deem it unsustainable and rebuild it and make it a legitimate trail.

    Such was the case with Mo Heinous in Bent Creek Experimental Forest of Pisgah National Forest. This was a social trail known to the locals as the name Mo Heinous but it was an unrecognized trail by the Forest Service. The Forest Service took that trail, closed and re-naturalized the upper half and rebuilt it into a sustainable trail and renamed it Green's Lick.

    Now one thing I can guarantee. If you get caught building illegal trails, the MAN, will rain down hell upon you.

    Quoted from The Blue Ridge Outdoors:

    "The Hick Hucksters are a group of freeriders based in Boone, North Carolina that have helped grow the sport in the Southeast over the last several years by creating an online hub of information, videos, and pictures. Five years ago, the Hick Hucksters’ enthusiasm got the better of them, landing the group in a whirlwind of legal trouble when they built an un-permitted freeride trail in the Wilson’s Creek area of Pisgah National Forest.

    The trail was dubbed Nam, and it made the best of the natural freeride terrain that Wilson’s has to offer. The Hucksters were busted at gunpoint by forest rangers during a “work day” on Nam, and the group received a bevy of legal penalties including a 90-day ban from all national forests."


    What this article doesn't talk about is how the Hick Hucksters were 1st told they had a 7 year ban from the National Forest complete with confiscation of tools and their bikes. They later went to the Forest Service with a plan that included several hundred volunteer hours doing trail maintenance on established trails + establishing themselves on a more professional manor, + other items that helped them reduce the penalty to the 90 day ban from the National Forest.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •