Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Singletrack groupie
    Reputation: Bandit402's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    70

    New question here. Trek 9 vs. Rocky Mountain Element 70?

    Hey guys,

    My pops is looking to replace his old cannondale with a larger size/better fit. He's about 6'3.5" and 280lbs. These are the two bikes that he's narrowed it down to...

    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...l_ex/fuelex90/

    http://www.bikes.com/bikes/2007/ELEMENT/element-70.aspx

    What worries me is the race design...seems a lot of the race bikes are built more for the 165lb racers than the bigger guys. Any advice would be great!

    Thanks,

    Bandit

  2. #2
    NMBP/OMBA crew!
    Reputation: Strykar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    275
    im a big dude, 230, 6ft 1in, and the trek 9 held up for me real well. it was only a demo ride, but for 45 minutes, i did some pretty aggressive trail riding on it. that thing is sweet. ive never riden a RM, so i have no idea about it. the trek is good stuff though imo.
    http://ocalabicyclecenter.com/


    Rubber side down is good for me

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    11,235
    The RM Element is a solid frame with well built pivots the weight should be fine.

    The RM Element is known for a shorter cockpit, so be sure to take that into consideration when choosing size, often a longer stem, and the seat adjusted well to the rear is required.

  4. #4
    kabouterclan member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    404
    exactly. You just beat me to it

    Thes are 2 very different bikes anyway:
    • The EX is a 5" suspension trailbike
    • The Element is a 4"suspension XC/marathon/trail bike.
    • Rocky's best comparison to the EX would be a ETSX. Somewhat heavier but with a Talas fork


    About weight
    Can't really help you there, I'm 69kg myself . But I think that a bike that's built for bigger bumps might be somewhat better if your heavy?

    About size
    • Treks have waaaay long toptubes: the 19" has a 625mm TT, the 21" has a 645 TT!
    • Rockys are shorter. My 20.5" Element has a 615mm TT. I'm 1.9m (~6f3.5") and my legs are really long, so the TT is okay for me.

    I suggest you try the Rocky 20.5 and the Trek in 19"and 21". Make sure you get these things right before deciding:
    • saddle height. The 19" Trek might be too small even with a 400mm seatpost! I ride a high Gobi saddle, 180mm cranks (tip!) and eggbeaters and my seatpost is maxed out.
    • Cockpit length. 130mm stem is max. And you won't seatposts wth setback longer than 400mm.
    • bar height. Smaller bike means shorter headtube means lower bar. Longer travel fork means higher bar.


    Hope this helps. Both bikes are really nice
    Sent from my HAL 9000

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •