Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: No Endo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    116

    Hydration Packs...

    What are you all using for Hydration Back Packs? Big chest and wide shoulders make it difficult to find something very comfortable.. Would be for mountain biking up to full day rides and hikes.
    What are you doing reading this? Go out and RIDE!

  2. #2
    S-Mart's Top of the Line
    Reputation: H3LlIoN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    272
    I have a bajillion camel baks, but I hate using them because they ultimately don't hold that much water, and the weight kills my shoulders after about an hour. I switched to twin bottle carriers on the frame, and I try and plan my rides such that I can fill them up along the way. I usually get two of the big "smart" water bottles that are like 34 ounces, as they fit perfectly and are held in my my frame. It works out really easily when I'm on long road rides.

    If I'm out in the woods, I carry one of those bottles and a katadyn filtration bottle. If I absolutely have no other choice, or for really long woods rides and rides without streams/creeks, I rock the camelbak that's the straight 100L bladder and carrier, with no big pockets. I can't remember the model name, but it basically just carries the water bladder, a phone and some car keys, and that's about it. I have also been known to put a pannier on my mountain bikes just so I won't have to shoulder carry the weight. Hope that helps.

    - H

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    644
    Dakine Nomad, end of story. Ive had mine for I guess... 4 years now? Maybe more? I cant remember. Its held up perfectly. Its been through all sorts of races, numerous different countries; to hell and back. Im 215lbs, with wide shoulders and a large chest and it fits great. Its got a large range of adjustment, great pockets and compartments and some fantastic straps/clips.

    The hip belt was always something that mattered to me. I hate the 3/4" wide hip straps with a wimpy clip that just cut into your side and offer no stability. The Nomad has a large padded area that wraps firmly around your upper-hip area with a large strap and buckle. It stays where you put it, comfortably. It also has a system on the outside to carry a full-face, or obviously a standard XC helmet. Ive strapped my full face, leg and arm armor and Leatt brace to it without a problem. Plus food, water, phone, tools, extra crap. Its one of my most valued pieces of equipment. It has a large capacity but packs very tidy and compact for day-rides. Ive even gone camping/hiking with it for 2+ days. Its been melted while attached to the back of a leaf blower, thrown off cliffs, washed down rivers, frozen and even thrown up on once. It rocks. End of story. Try one!

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mestapho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,587
    I'm cheap, so I found a great fake Camelbak made by Coleman
    at Walmart. It's holds 2 liters of water and has a second pocket for my tools, keys, phone, etc. It was around $25 and is in the camping section by the backpacks.
    They have another version with just the water pocket thats $20.
    The chest strap isn't big enough but the waist belt fits fine. I've never felt like it was going to slip off or anything.
    I'm 6'1" 250.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rdickens48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    193
    I like my camel back blowfish. Zips open to make for a bigger bag if you need to carry more. I also believe it comes with a 3L bladder.

  6. #6
    No talent hack
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    912
    Camel Back Mule... vintage 1998. I have been using it for 13 years now. Biking, hiking and even mowing yards (I mow 6-8 on Fridays for extra money). I have never had a complaint about it. The fabric is starting to give me hell and is falling apart, but I figure 13 years of good hard use (I have replaced the bladders a few times but not due to wear) is great for it. I plan on getting another Mule to replace it as the newer mules have a better waste strap. As an aside, I think the Alpine Explorer would make a better hiking pack than the Mule.... more space for camera equipment.
    Fat guys need bikes too.

  7. #7
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,208
    I'm 6'4", 245 pounds with a 50" chest. I had a Mule, switched to a Hawg. The Hawg looks normal on me like the Mules look on my friends.
    I like turtles

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Joules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,258
    Osprey talon. It's the only hydration pack I've ever seen that wasn't designed around someone 5' tall. The semi-frame thing, with the back that holds it's shape regardless of how full it is, that's a nice feature, but really it wins over everything camelbak, hydrapak, leyzene and dakine make simply because it's designed for someone adult height. Seriously, I've had about 15 hydration packs over the years, and this is the only one I didn't have to cut off the waist strap - because it the pack is long enough, it actually reaches my waist!

    My gripe about it is it's obviously made by a backpack company, not a bike company. Tool organization is a little lacking compared to some of the others out there, but the fact that it fits someone over 5' tall more than makes up for it.

  9. #9
    S-Mart's Top of the Line
    Reputation: H3LlIoN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    272
    I just dug mine out of the closet...it's a camelbak lobo. Again, water, keys and phone and that's about it.

  10. #10
    Ow!
    Reputation: clydecrash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    689
    Another one for the Dakine Nomad. Been using one for many years now. Big enough to hold lots of stuff (including a helmet/pads if you want), but can be compressed for smaller loads. Probably the most comfortable "regular" pack I have used.

    But, this last summer I got one of the Ergon packs. Heavier than the Dakine, not as many pouchs/ect., but very comfortable. Ergon's system actually works, and can be adjusted for the proper height. I put it away and brought the Nomad back out because I thought the Ergon was just too much for the 1 or 2 hours rides I do. I think I going to get it back out though, because it really is that much more comfortable. Oh, and it is really that much more expensive too (but I bought mine on sale).

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: edouble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,675

    I have a Wingnut...

    Hydration pack. had Camelbak before, the Wingnut is so much better. It holds 100oz and centers the weight low near your waist taking a lot of strain off of your back. It also has side pockets that I can access without even taking it off. Its light but has plenty of storage for pump, tools, wallet, keys, phone, etc. Simply the best imho. They typical out score all the other Packs in group tests in the Euro mtb mags. Camelbak even has a model that copies their design, the sincerest form of flattery. If you can't beat em....
    EAST COAST
    CLYDESDALE
    DREADLOCKED
    STEEL RIDER

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    312
    I am 330lbs with a 56" chest, very wide frame. I have a 2011 Camelbak HAWG NV. The waist strap doesn't fit around my 42" waist but because I am so big, the bag doesn't seem to bounce around at all. Chest buckle still snaps which holds it in place just fine. Plus it's a bigger pack and doesn't look like I am wearing a women's baby backpack...........

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    12
    i use a Camelbak hawg nv and love it, holds alot of water and all the gear we need for the trails, bag stays put and with the venting system my back stays fairly dry even with riding in the Missouri heat.

  14. #14
    long standing member
    Reputation: PCinSC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,112
    Six years with the same Dakine Nomad. It's the only pack I've tried that fits my 5'11", 295lb frame. It's taken a beating over the years, including crashes while downhilling where I landed or slid on my back. Still in great shape. If my gut get's too big (over 300lbs) the waist strap won't buckle (maybe I need an extender? ). Not a huge deal, the chest strap keeps it stable, even while downhilling and hitting jumps and drops.

    I switched from the stock bladder to a Camelbak 3 liter bladder because I was have leakage issues with the original. Otherwise, this is the perfect pack for me.

  15. #15
    Old Punk
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    523
    I have a camelbak mule that's at least 10 years old. Same bladder and bite valve body, I've changed the hose and rubber bite valve 3 or four times. This thing has been through a life of abuse. Crashes, flew out of my doorless jeep, paddling trips, hiking and all kinds of family outings.
    It's about time for a new one though. I'm getting a hawg this time, I need more room for camera gear, and the strap/padding/ventilation system is bad ass. You won't go wrong with a camelbak.
    '09 Specialized Rockhopper expert 29
    Born 26" trials
    '07 Specialized Allez

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    25
    Check out one of the Osprey packs. I recently picked up a Raptor 14 that's great. The cool thing about them is that they make two sizes (similar to backpacking packs) for different torso sizes. I'm 6'4" and the Large Raptor fits me with room to spare.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    697
    how is the waist strap on the raptor?

  18. #18
    (size) large member
    Reputation: (sp?)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    6
    I've got a bunch of them.

    Bladders
    Some bought, some gifts, some freebies: Camel Back, Hydra Pak, Dakine and Osprey. I like the latter two bladders the best. Both have great valves. The removable tube on the Dakine works well. The "exoskeleton" on the Osprey is one of the best ideas in drink bladders. Hydra Pak's roll-up bladder is nice.

    Packs
    Osprey and Dakine have the best packs. They're long enough to fit. The strap management on the Osprey keeps flapping straps at bay. The magnetic bite valve catch is nice. Warranty on Osprey is lifetime.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: taterbug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    414
    Wingnut Hyper. With a Camelback 100 oz bladder. Perfect for a clyde
    Currently reviewing an Ibex Maroc 29er

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    81
    Plus one on a pre 2000 Camelback Hawg. The new Hawgs dont seem to hold enough hydration bladders or gear for really long rides.

    I'm 6' 5" 240 and I can hardly fit into anything else short of a full on ultralight backpack. I will be sad when mine finally bites the dust.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    81
    Plus one on a pre 2000 Camelback Hawg. The new Hawgs dont seem to hold enough hydration bladders or gear for really long rides.

    I'm 6' 5" 240 and I can hardly fit into anything else short of a full on ultralight backpack. I will be sad when mine finally bites the dust.

    I did recently try the new Leyzyne pack. Very nice, especially if you have alot of Leyzyne tools, etc. Again, the hip belt was almost two small and the storage pockets on the belt were not useable while riding. But otherwise, good quality, fit and finish. But, alas again, too small for very long rides (ie, one bladder only).

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    167
    using a camelbak ambush here. wanted something tough and while small thats fine since odds are ill be riding in +90 if not +100 degrees regularly but when i get in better shape(hopefully lol) ill buy a bigger one for longer trips. on the topic of hydration packs what does everyone put in theirs? i know water is suggested but i know you can put practically anything else in it too as long as you wash it out well maybe not beer or soda because of the carbonation but i imagine even them if you only put a small amount or your bladder was just that tough though i dont know anyone putting beer or soda in it cept for maybe a small ride or more likely a party/something and just getting there by bike.

    edit: whats your budget? hmm the ospreys look nice(manta 30) but the load limit seems to be a bit low? and it seems same sizes as camelbaks 19.5 inches tall. wait. are you talking their backpacks just putting a bladder in it or their hydration packs?
    Last edited by gillotte; 11-03-2011 at 09:19 PM. Reason: spelling...

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GTscoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,143
    I use a Camelbak Loco and it works pretty well but is small for commuting for longer trips out.

    I'm looking at the new Ergon line of packs to get myself for christmas.

  24. #24
    no, I'm not riding SS
    Reputation: shorner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    176
    Quote Originally Posted by Joules View Post
    Osprey talon. It's the only hydration pack I've ever seen that wasn't designed around someone 5' tall. The semi-frame thing, with the back that holds it's shape regardless of how full it is, that's a nice feature, but really it wins over everything camelbak, hydrapak, leyzene and dakine make simply because it's designed for someone adult height. Seriously, I've had about 15 hydration packs over the years, and this is the only one I didn't have to cut off the waist strap - because it the pack is long enough, it actually reaches my waist!

    My gripe about it is it's obviously made by a backpack company, not a bike company. Tool organization is a little lacking compared to some of the others out there, but the fact that it fits someone over 5' tall more than makes up for it.
    +1. The Talon has held up great for me, and the bladder is top notch.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    167
    talon looks nice but it was designed more for hikers/backpackers who arent as concerned Id say with weight as a guy on a bike and is more for carrying lots of bigger gear. camelbaks have packs pretty much just as big, yes including hydration packs. just noone has packs the size youre wanting designed for bikes. so its a tough call. ones designed for riding or full sized ones that arent. and if youre going to carry a full load whether osprey/camelbak/whoever wouldnt it be better to have it on a rack or pannier or am i wrong? not sure as no experience with like +40 pounds of weight on a rack though have ridden with over 40 in a regular backpack and would have much rather carried that on a rack if i could (but thats more a combo of the heat here, bad seat/grips on bike)

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for your .02 on Hydration Packs
    By skos in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 10:52 AM
  2. hydration packs
    By mlepito in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-07-2009, 03:41 PM
  3. Hydration Packs
    By Starflyer59 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-15-2005, 07:33 PM
  4. Hydration packs FR / DH use ?
    By keen in forum Downhill - Freeride
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-03-2004, 07:06 PM
  5. Hydration Packs that fit?
    By Tambocor in forum Clydesdales/Tall Riders
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 04-29-2004, 07:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •