Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Bike suggestions for Fatsos...

    Hi there
    I'm a fatso... but I used to LOVE riding bikes when I was young. It was how I kept weight off.
    I want to buy a new bike and start up again.
    I need a bike that can handle my weight. Last time I tried riding a bike, the tires sorta... flattened (I was 315 at that point I think)

    I am currently 6'3" and 290lbs

    I plan to ride some trails and drop some weight.

    I need something burly.
    I want it to be good on road and on light trails

  2. #2
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Chapel
    Hi there
    I'm a fatso... but I used to LOVE riding bikes when I was young. It was how I kept weight off.
    I want to buy a new bike and start up again.
    I need a bike that can handle my weight. Last time I tried riding a bike, the tires sorta... flattened (I was 315 at that point I think)

    I am currently 6'3" and 290lbs

    I plan to ride some trails and drop some weight.

    I need something burly.
    I want it to be good on road and on light trails
    First of all, this forum is not for fatsoes; it is for those of us who happen to be big boned.

    Now, the real question is, How much are you going to spend? You can always go with the Kona Hoss, as it was designed to be a XC bike for clydes. Or, if you want to spend more money, there are some good full suspension bikes out there that will stand up to clyde abuse.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    heh. I'm actually just calling myself a fatso (I should have titled this "Bike suggestions for A fatso"). But even at my lightest, I find it hard to get below 220lbs. I'm a BIG guy overall. 38" waist is the smallest I've ever worn past age 14.
    I'm actually looking for something on the 'less expensive' side.
    Someone else mentioned a Kona Hoss to me
    I've been told to look for a primarily rigid frame and fork and big fat tires and tubes.
    I don't think I need a suspended bike as the trails I'll probably ride are pretty soft.
    I'm might want to consider a full suspender later when I've dropped the weight and want to hit the more abusive trails.
    Last edited by Chapel; 06-29-2006 at 12:19 PM.

  4. #4
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Chapel
    heh. I'm actually just calling myself a fatso (I should have titled this "Bike suggestions for A fatso"). But even at my lightest, I find it hard to get below 220lbs. I'm a BIG guy overall. 38" inseams are the smallest I've ever worn past age 14.
    I'm actually looking for something on the 'less expensive' side.
    Someone else mentioned a Kona Hoss to me
    I've been told to look for a primarily rigid frame and fork and big fat tires and tubes.
    I don't think I need a suspended bike as the trails I'll probably ride are pretty soft.
    I'm might want to consider a full suspender later when I've dropped the weight and want to hit the more abusive trails.
    I was just kidding about the fatso bit.

    The Hoss is really overbuilt, and it can take a lot of abuse. There are some who think it is good for dirt jumping it is so burly, but it is meant as a XC bike. The basic Hoss goes for $800, and the Hoss Dee-lux goes for $1100. Some have mentioned that the forks on the basic are not so great. I wouldn't know because I built mine up from the frame.

    You could go cheaper and look at the Specialized Rockhopper. You can get one with decent forks and brakes for around $600.

    A lot is going to depend on what your local stores carry. My advice for now is to check out the local shops and see what brands they carry. Also see how large the frames run (it won't do you any good if the largest frame is 19" since you're going to need upwards of 22" with that inseam). Then we can decide on which bike from which brand is best for you.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    sorry, my WAIST it 46... my Inseam is 32"... :P

  6. #6
    Fat, but working on it...
    Reputation: IAmCosmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    537
    I'm riding a Santa Cruz Chameleon and love it. Holds up nicely to me, and I'm about 250.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    I guess the big question is... how much money is it gonna cost me to get a basic 'big fella bike'

  8. #8
    Klydesdale
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by Guyechka
    I was just kidding about the fatso bit.

    The Hoss is really overbuilt, and it can take a lot of abuse. There are some who think it is good for dirt jumping it is so burly, but it is meant as a XC bike. The basic Hoss goes for $800, and the Hoss Dee-lux goes for $1100. Some have mentioned that the forks on the basic are not so great. I wouldn't know because I built mine up from the frame.

    Personally, I don't think that a MTB that uses a Shimano FH-M475 rear hub is "really overbuilt"or "burly". The frame may be pretty beefy but if you keep cracking freewheel bodies and bending axles like I've done with every level of Shimano freehub I've tried, you're going to want a to upgrade to a stronger hub pretty soon. (And I'm "only" 250 and don't do any sort of real dirt jumping.)

  9. #9
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Chapel
    I guess the big question is... how much money is it gonna cost me to get a basic 'big fella bike'
    Hard tail = from $700. At least, this is what I figure you are looking at in the first place, hard tails. And there are several, but, again, it all depends on what your shop carries. I would not recommend ordering one through the mail. I mean, there are clyde worthy selections from Marin, GT, Specialized, Kona--and those are just the bigger brand names.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    105
    My suggestion would be to see if you can rent a bike and try a couple of ride first, and then go from there. A friend of mine just bought a bike and less than a mounth later decided that the trails weren't for him. Don't make the mistake that I made 4 mounths ago. And that was getting back into biking for as little as possible. I spent 300.00 on a mtb with entry level equip. wasn't one week before I stripped my first set of cranks. Upgraded them and three weeks later stripped them out. I am 285 lbs. Ended up trading in the bike lossing a 1/4 of my money and getting some thing that could handle me. You are better waiting and saving your money for some thing decent.

  11. #11
    Making fat cool since '71
    Reputation: ImaKlyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,829

    Lots of "depends"...

    As you can imagine there are lots of threads on this and if you want more info than you can shake a pound of bacon at just search: Bikes for Clydes, Best+Bike+Clydesdale, etc...

    That being said, if money is the most predominant factor in your decision the "best" option is the Hoss. The SC Chameleon is a good choice for us, but about 30% more $ (give or take sales). My biggest bit of advice (being a clyde, being an aggressive trail rider, having absolutely zero skill, having once weighed 310+...) is to be faithful to whatever bike you get and do *not* get discouraged when things break, it happens. Despite protestations to the opposite all bits can and do break. Shimano hubs in my experience been one of the worst things a clyde can put on their bikes. It's an area I would drop some coin on. I've rebuilt tons (literally...) of rear hubs (XT) before I decided to just drop some coin on "good" hubs (King). Zero issues since, period. Having a compotent builder lace your wheels makes a shiteload of difference in how those finicky little bastards roll and stay true as well. Factory wheels may have decent bits on them, but machines don't build a wheel like a shop wrench can (in my not so freakin humble opinion...).

    Anywho, and back to the question I suppose: give yourself a grand to get a bike, new, or six hundred bucks used and *plan* on things breaking (hubs, seatpost, cranks, rims, pedals). If I could only focus on one part of my bike to put lots of importance on: wheels. They will serve you long and well or cause buckets of heartache just when you don't want it (7 miles into the trail for example?). Other than that, replace things as they come up. *My* 2 1/2 cents on bikes for someone in your position since you asked: Hoss or some hardtail Giant and spend as much money as you can on wheel upgrades. Forks fail eventually and most (not all) OEM forks suck for clydes (fork would be my second upgrade since I like to know my bike will go where I point it...). Thomson seatposts rock, Chris King and Hadley hubs are the best, Race Face cranks? yep (I'm experimenting with Truvativ right now...), stay away from carbon bars for now, Sun rims are flat out the best (rhynolite xl; cheap and reliable!!!!).

    Sorry for the length, but I'm stuck in Gold Beach, OR for work and I hate this place...bored. Take care, good luck and if you find yourself in OR wanting to ride send me a message I'm always up for a ride with a fellow clyde! Enjoy the ride my brother in bacon.

    Brock...
    Are the wheels roundish? Ride it.

    Disciples Of Dirt, come ride with us.

  12. #12
    Brackish
    Reputation: carbuncle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,625
    I'm 6'2" and 240 right now. My all around play bike is the Iron Horse Yakuza Waka-Gashira. It's a big, burly hardtail that has withstood 10 months of abuse so far, including general trail riding (very nimble, particularly with clipless pedals), drops of up to 4' and some skatepark riding. I love it, and Performance usually has deals on them or their lower priced counterparts (Chimpira and something else). I ride the 19" frame, and it's pretty damn heavy but heavy duty as well.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    crap... I may not be able to afford to get one this summer then

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    how about this one:
    2001 Rockhopper
    If I can at least get the full bike, I can worry about upgrading later
    what size frame do I need for a 32" inseam though?
    Someone mentioned betweeen 19 and 21"

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    Or this one
    Needs a new freewheel
    I fix BMWs, Saabs and Volkswagens... it can't be too hard to fix a bike...

  16. #16
    Making fat cool since '71
    Reputation: ImaKlyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,829

    Oh yeah...

    I forgot all about the Iron Horse hardtails. Must be too many blows to the head in my life...

    I even rode an Iron Horse Chimpira (Yakuza line?) to check out for a buddy who was looking to get into the sport and it was ok. I only have urban time on one, but it took some stairs and junk like that just fine. I'm still not a fan of factory wheels, but that bike was a good place to start (he went with a kona though). Like the above cat said performancbike.com seems to have the Iron Horses on sale pretty much all the time.

    Brock...

    edit: size? depends on inseam and toptube length and torso length. Some "fudging" can be done with stems and seatposts if something is an inch or so out of wack though; sometimes. It sounds like you are sort of in between. My dh bike was smaller (19") and my all around is bigger (21"). More to think about.
    Are the wheels roundish? Ride it.

    Disciples Of Dirt, come ride with us.

  17. #17
    Making fat cool since '71
    Reputation: ImaKlyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,829

    No...

    Quote Originally Posted by Chapel
    Or this one
    Needs a new freewheel
    I fix BMWs, Saabs and Volkswagens... it can't be too hard to fix a bike...
    That fork blows, bad. It's an old bike (98 or so?) and who knows what's been done to it (the frame that is).

    Maybe the other one though.

    Brock...
    Are the wheels roundish? Ride it.

    Disciples Of Dirt, come ride with us.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    How about the Specialized HardRocks

    This one is within my price range

    Boston Craigslist bikes
    Any and all suggestions welcome

  19. #19
    Making fat cool since '71
    Reputation: ImaKlyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,829
    Looks fine, size?
    Are the wheels roundish? Ride it.

    Disciples Of Dirt, come ride with us.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    emailed him.
    Those Hardrocks seem to be a good value

  21. #21
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,127
    Quote Originally Posted by klydesdale
    Personally, I don't think that a MTB that uses a Shimano FH-M475 rear hub is "really overbuilt"or "burly". The frame may be pretty beefy but if you keep cracking freewheel bodies and bending axles like I've done with every level of Shimano freehub I've tried, you're going to want a to upgrade to a stronger hub pretty soon. (And I'm "only" 250 and don't do any sort of real dirt jumping.)
    First, I built my own from the frame up, so I don't know all the components they put on the base or dee-lux versions.

    Secondly, I meant that the frame was overbuilt, and I'm sticking by that.

  22. #22
    Your bike is incorrigible
    Reputation: Guyechka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,127
    With a 32" inseam, I wouldn't go any bigger than a 19". However, I have to ask how you measured your inseam. Put it this way, I wear pants with a 33" inseam, but for bikes my inseam is 35".

    Hardrocks are good.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    What bikes have steel frames instead of ally?

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28
    I rode a Large Hardrock today.
    Wow... I forgot how to ride. That was nerve wracking.

    I think it fits though. i just need a bigger seat.
    $499 new for a 2007 Hardrock Sport Disk

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DrugMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Chapel
    What bikes have steel frames instead of ally?
    The Surly Instigator.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •