Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 200 of 506
  1. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    235
    Depends on your where you are riding, because this statement is not always true:

    "when I got hooked on the hardtail 29er. I love it that all the pedal you do goes to the ground(no waste)"

    This statement is often wrong depending on terrain. FS bikes with less travel have been shown to transfer your effort of pedal to tire better in many cases than a hardtail. When your over chattry terrain and your rear end is off the ground your pedaling is turning a tire off the ground on a hardtail.

    It all depends on the terrain and rider.

    Many studies have shown that actual times vs. the sensation of "fast" are often wrong also.

  2. #102
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by bboytab View Post
    I was a full suspension(spesh Enduro) guy until 3 weeks ago when I got hooked on the hardtail 29er. I love it that all the pedal you do goes to the ground(no waste) and I am just hesitant with getting the Scalpel since its a FS. Does the Sclapel 2(Monarch)have a lockout? With the recent comments looks like it is an efficient climber too.
    That's the actual bike that got me hooked on the Scalpel ... I test rode the local reps bike down here in Florida. The first time I rode it, I wasn't very sure about it. The suspension and the handle bar didn't feel right to me . The reason for that is that the bike was dialed in for a local pro racer who used the bike for a 6hr race, 150lb rider with infinite physical and mountain biking skills with an extremely (23 1/2") narrow bar for me.
    The LBS changed out the bar and dialed in the suspension for me (220lb) and the rest is history. I went for the Scalpel 1 because of the weight of the bike, no other reason.
    The thing I like most is climbing and riding the heavily rooted sections . The suspension on this bike excels in both of these arenas.
    Go for it, you won't regret it...

  3. #103
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Hiway View Post
    Depends on your where you are riding, because this statement is not always true:

    "when I got hooked on the hardtail 29er. I love it that all the pedal you do goes to the ground(no waste)"

    This statement is often wrong depending on terrain. FS bikes with less travel have been shown to transfer your effort of pedal to tire better in many cases than a hardtail. When your over chattry terrain and your rear end is off the ground your pedaling is turning a tire off the ground on a hardtail.

    It all depends on the terrain and rider.

    Many studies have shown that actual times vs. the sensation of "fast" are often wrong also.
    There is a course called Oleta . The roots in this park are designed to remove the teeth from your mouth . A dental nightmare . Anyways, this place was designed by GOD for a full suspension. There are quite a few who ride it on hardtails there but they are the guys you might see in walkers when they get to be my age (50) . I'm just jealous, I can't take it

    I prefer FS myself. I'm not so interested in being so connected to nature anymore, I prefer to ride for as long as I can and enjoy nature that way.
    Last edited by torque29er; 04-10-2012 at 05:56 PM.

  4. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    631
    Err

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    863
    Quote Originally Posted by Asbury View Post
    I picked up my new Cannondale Scalpel 29 Carbon 1 last Saturday. Wow! It is a very visually appealing bike to say the least. Some things the photos have not really shown were the width of the top tube and the “S” bend of the seat tube to make way for the front derailleur, very unique to be sure. The rear seat and chain stays are also very thick. In person, the bike just looks very aggressive and robust; it is nothing short of awesome. I ordered a large and elected to replace the XO brakes for the World cup version of XX. I decided to keep it a full SRAM kit for simplicity sake and also because my lbs has SRAM parts readily available. Weight on my size large was 23.04 lbs on the shop scale. Apart from adding an Arundel cage and XTR pedals it is bone stock.

    So after picking it up on Saturday it was not until Monday that I was able to get my first ride in on the new machine. I want to preface my ride report with some of my experience. I am 6’2”, 175 lbs and race CAT 1 XC, 100 milers, 24 hours, etc. I’ve been moving away from XC towards endurance since I’m getting tired of the pain of XC racing at 39! My previous bike was a Yeti ASR-C and I loved it. However, I had the chance to demo an Orbea 29er while the Yeti frame was being warrantied (for the 3rd time) and I really liked the feel of the 29er more underneath my gangly physique. The Yeti was an awesome bike but 3 frames being warrantied really concerned me so I sold it. I own a Cannondale Super Six and that is what led me to starting looking at this bike.

    So first ride out: wow! When I first starting riding I knew from experience the big wheels would make the turns flow much more. This bike was better than the Orbea though because it rarely lost contact with the ground, despite how rough things became. Riding on hardback with heavy leaf cover with a root/rock scattered here there, I did not feel like I could override this bike’s ability. I still did not push it to the limits, but I can say those limits are much greater than the Yeti’s. The adjective that kept running through my mind was “direct.” This bike is so precise, direct engagement of pedal input; direct feeling on the steering, direct shifting; everything just felt very “connected” if that makes sense. One example I’ll give is running over a loose rock in the middle of the trail. Previous bikes would absorb the impact and then give a secondary bounce to the left or right, leading to a rough or unstable feeling. The Scalpel addressed this with a very secure feeling lateral bounce and rested back down with a very direct/solid feel. I think this has mostly to do with the combination of the Lefty and big wheel, but also contributing to this is the very noticeably light front end. This is the lightest front end I have ever felt on a bike, which has included carbon forks and high end 26” wheel sets. The pedaling input also feels very stiff and direct. It is the stiffest pedal input of any frame I’ve ridden. I expected this because of the size of the PF30 BB and the massive seat stays and chain stays. One slight annoyance was that my calves would regularly hit the seat stay, nothing major and something I was able to overcome. On one climb that is very steep with rocks, I’d have problems spinning out on the Yeti. I expected that not too happen on with this bike and I was right. The big wheels and suspension kept it securely hooked up and I motored up what used to be a 50/50 rideable hill. The Schwalbe’s only spun out one time climbing, but I think that was more gear selection and leaves over loose rocks. They seem like they’re going to work pretty well for me and running them at 27psi probably helped, but I think I may run them even lower next time out because the sidewall flex did not ever appear like I was coming close to the rim.

    One other thing about this bike I noticed is that it is quiet, damn quiet. I kept trying to figure out what was different about the ride (besides the feel) and I realized I never heard the chain slap the frame. I’m not sure if this is the XX derailleur or the design of the frame, but I noticed it and I really like it. The Yeti was louder than a busted chainsaw going through rock gardens, so maybe that it is why I noticed this bikes stealthy silence. The shifting also was very direct and quiet and I can tell that I am going to be very happy with the 2x10 setup. Having ridden XTR triple cranks for the last 6 years, this was a huge step up. If you been contemplating 2x10, do it; I’m sold.

    You can probably tell I am a huge fan of this bike, however; it can’t always be all puppy dogs and ice cream. Some things that weren’t what I expected. As I mentioned I changed out the XO’s to the XX WC brakes. I’ve had Avid brakes in the past and I haven’t been a fan. I’m not sure I’ve changed my mind on these brakes. After riding XTR these felt really industrial on their modulation. I just don’t like the metal on metal feeling you get with Avid/Sram brakes. I may switch the pads to organic to see if that will help because overall power is fine. One other strange thing is the cable routing on this bike. It looks like an afterthought. The derailleur cables run on the underneath side of the down tube, but the rear brake line runs on the top left of the down tube, being secured by a clamp that doubles as the lower bolt for the bottle cage. It makes for a weird juncture at the left side crank arm and really just kind of looks ugly on an otherwise beautiful bike. I don’t know why they would not have just had all 3 cables/lines run down the bottom of the down tube. Nothing major, but I thought I’d mention it. The area reserved for the bottle cage is also a little tight, but I was still able to use a 24oz bottle with just a slightly different process to get it removed and resecured quickly. These are not huge issues and do not take away from the primary purpose of the bike.

    I have a pretty good bar to seat drop and I really feel secure and fast on this bike. I think I read on another forum somewhere the feeling of sitting “in” the bike vs. “on” the bike. I just feel it “click” in as soon as the pedals start turning. This bike does everything very well and I have no doubt we will see several thousand miles together, miles that will be seen a lot more quickly and comfortable than I have experienced in the past!
    (A few pics from the maiden ride)
    EDIT: Put paragraphs back in!
    How have the tri cons been holding up,I'm thinking of buying a set for my flash...sweet ride !!

  6. #106
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Asbury View Post
    I've had several rides now, with the longest being a 4.5 hour training ride. All my initial thoughts are the same. This is the perfect machine for endurance races, I never came off the Yeti feeling as "fresh" as I did after being in the saddle of the Scalpel for several hours. The bike is just so solid. I don't think I'll ever ride a non Lefty bike again. Also, It's a great climber which has been very surprising to me. I wish there was a second bottle cage, but the seat post mounted Spec adapter has fixed that. The 2x10 has plenty of "granny" gear; I wouldn't be surprised to see 3x10's disappear altogether in a few years. All in all, very pleased.
    Post some more pics!!!

    Did you re-route the cables?
    How did you end up with the water bottle issue? I have the same issue...

  7. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    18
    Scapel 29 many models and sizes carbon and alloy.
    The Peddler Of Long Branch. Ask for Mike

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    20
    So i finally made the decision and brought her home yesterday. Got a couple Stans' valve and sealant.....took her tubes out and went to the trails for an evening maiden ride.....so happy i made the right decision.....im faster on this bike.......cant wait to take her out again...

    <a href="http://s200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/?action=view&amp;current=scalpel.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/scalpel.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

    <a href="http://s200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/?action=view&amp;current=75c5fdf3.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/75c5fdf3.jpg" border="0" alt="Uploaded from the Photobucket iPhone App"></a>


    Quote Originally Posted by bboytab View Post
    need help deciding which bike to get...will be used to join a few xc races and will be my weekend warrior bike

    local trails: roots and rocks...east coast

    LBS prices:
    2012 Flash Carbon 2 - $4,400 , can get this for $3800(local seller)
    2012 Scalpel Carbon 2 - $4,800

  9. #109
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by bboytab View Post
    So i finally made the decision and brought her home yesterday. Got a couple Stans' valve and sealant.....took her tubes out and went to the trails for an evening maiden ride.....so happy i made the right decision.....im faster on this bike.......cant wait to take her out again...

    <a href="http://s200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/?action=view&amp;current=scalpel.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/scalpel.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

    <a href="http://s200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/?action=view&amp;current=75c5fdf3.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa53/bboytab/75c5fdf3.jpg" border="0" alt="Uploaded from the Photobucket iPhone App"></a>
    Congrats on your Bike!!!
    Looks Great!!!

    Now your only problem will be how not to run over the guys in front of you, and looking at their faces after you pass them up...

  10. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dancruz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    507
    Getting a Scalpel1 hopefully next week.Live in Co. and need to switch to a 22 or 24 chain ring on the crank. The 26 is too big for all the climbing out here. What is the least expensive way to do this? What chainrings fit the hollowgram crank?...if any.....Any help would be appreciated......
    Just ride and quit bit$hin.......Yeti SB5+..SIR9 SS...CD Synapse DA...

  11. #111
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    94
    Getting close to 900 miles on my scalpel 2 thus far. Love it, by far the best bike I have ever owned.

    Finally have it set up the way I want it for racing.

    Mods I have made:
    Hollowgrams
    pluto titec carbon bar
    foam grips
    kcnc post
    selle italia carbon saddle
    Formula R1 brakes
    exustar spds

    with the stock arches/ignitors/R1/stock casette rotors the bike weighs 23.6lbs

    With my am29er carbon wheelset/Ikon/ashima rotors/xx cassette: 22.1lbs

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    20

    creaking headset?

    my 2012 scalpel 29er is now having this issue.....did you have this issue too?

  13. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    247
    I've got a few hundred miles on my Scalpel 1 29er. I was waiting until after my first endurance race to report but weather blew the race out.
    I decided to get The Scalpel because I wanted: a larger diameter front axle and have wanted to ride a lefty for awhile; to try a stiffer/larger back axle; and a lighter 29er fs rig. I'd been racing an Ellsworth Evolve for several years and liked the bike well enough to keep it that long.
    The Scalpel is comfortable in rough stuff. Stable with confident handling. Climbs well whether spinning or slowly picking your way up technical stuff. It is not as plush on descents as the Evolve but is exceptionally well mannered and plenty fast (for me) downhill.
    The suspension is well balanced when set at spec sag. I may fool with pressures and dampners some to see what different settings offer.
    It generally accelerates rides and climbs much like my hardtail. You also get the less beat, fresher feeling benefit of a fs hours into a ride.
    I went with I9 ultralight XC wheels and even with "flexy" crest wheels at 153 lbs. the bike is solid under me.
    With the wheels, a selle SLR TT, Xpedo Ti/Ti pedals, XX cassette, and slightly cut down bars it weighed in at 21lbs 12 oz.
    I expected to be kind of ambivalent due to the money and expected a good but "compromised" ride. I have to say "WOW, what a ride."

  14. #114
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Rovertd View Post
    I've got a few hundred miles on my Scalpel 1 29er. I was waiting until after my first endurance race to report but weather blew the race out.
    I decided to get The Scalpel because I wanted: a larger diameter front axle and have wanted to ride a lefty for awhile; to try a stiffer/larger back axle; and a lighter 29er fs rig. I'd been racing an Ellsworth Evolve for several years and liked the bike well enough to keep it that long.
    The Scalpel is comfortable in rough stuff. Stable with confident handling. Climbs well whether spinning or slowly picking your way up technical stuff. It is not as plush on descents as the Evolve but is exceptionally well mannered and plenty fast (for me) downhill.
    The suspension is well balanced when set at spec sag. I may fool with pressures and dampners some to see what different settings offer.
    It generally accelerates rides and climbs much like my hardtail. You also get the less beat, fresher feeling benefit of a fs hours into a ride.
    I went with I9 ultralight XC wheels and even with "flexy" crest wheels at 153 lbs. the bike is solid under me.
    With the wheels, a selle SLR TT, Xpedo Ti/Ti pedals, XX cassette, and slightly cut down bars it weighed in at 21lbs 12 oz.
    I expected to be kind of ambivalent due to the money and expected a good but "compromised" ride. I have to say "WOW, what a ride."
    Sounds awesome!!! Sounds like you like the bike, and I say you did pretty good by that light weight, posts some pics and congrats to you!!!

  15. #115
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by utah joe View Post
    Getting close to 900 miles on my scalpel 2 thus far. Love it, by far the best bike I have ever owned.

    Finally have it set up the way I want it for racing.

    Mods I have made:
    Hollowgrams
    pluto titec carbon bar
    foam grips
    kcnc post
    selle italia carbon saddle
    Formula R1 brakes
    exustar spds

    with the stock arches/ignitors/R1/stock casette rotors the bike weighs 23.6lbs

    With my am29er carbon wheelset/Ikon/ashima rotors/xx cassette: 22.1lbs
    Amazing weight, Nice Build !!!

  16. #116
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by bboytab View Post
    my 2012 scalpel 29er is now having this issue.....did you have this issue too?
    There's a rubber gasket near the top of the headset, Put some lubricant there and see if that's it. I had the same issue and it went away.

  17. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by dancruz View Post
    Getting a Scalpel1 hopefully next week.Live in Co. and need to switch to a 22 or 24 chain ring on the crank. The 26 is too big for all the climbing out here. What is the least expensive way to do this? What chainrings fit the hollowgram crank?...if any.....Any help would be appreciated......
    You'll need to get a triple ring spider in 104/64BCD. The BCD on the Scalpel will be 120/80. I've done both my Primus Mootry and my new Flirefly with the 104/64 and using 32/22 chain rings. I'm using a bash guard on the biggest ring. Works perfect.

  18. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by bboytab View Post
    my 2012 scalpel 29er is now having this issue.....did you have this issue too?
    Lube the spacers as noted and also make sure the headset is tight. The two headsets that I have pulled spacers out of were not greased as Cannondale states to do in there tech manual. I thought my headset was tight after removing spacers but it did settle in slightly and the creak came back. Had to snug it up.

  19. #119
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    norty_mtb...

    Hows the ride ?

    No pics yet ?

  20. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dancruz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    507
    So I got my Scalpel #1 yesterday. First ride impressions..LIGHT, TIGHT, and ready to FIGHT!...Wow what a fast rolling bike.Feels like a toyota truck if you know what I mean. Can't wait to put more miles on it. Will post pics soon..going to change the brakes out to XTR, everything else works sweet!!
    Just ride and quit bit$hin.......Yeti SB5+..SIR9 SS...CD Synapse DA...

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9
    2 first rides of the season on my Scalpel 2 29er and getting used to it (still making adjustments here and there on positioning)!
    I think i shall love it in time!

    Although my rear brake cable housing is way too long and slide a lot on the frame, which will get to wear if i don't fix it.
    Anyone have rerouted the rear brake cable and have pictures of it so i could figure out how to do it?
    Beside, where do you get the specialized clamps to do it?

    Thanks,

    JF

  22. #122
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by jfdeshaies View Post
    2 first rides of the season on my Scalpel 2 29er and getting used to it (still making adjustments here and there on positioning)!
    I think i shall love it in time!

    Although my rear brake cable housing is way too long and slide a lot on the frame, which will get to wear if i don't fix it.
    Anyone have rerouted the rear brake cable and have pictures of it so i could figure out how to do it?
    Beside, where do you get the specialized clamps to do it?

    Thanks,

    JF
    I'm running a 1 x 10 so I only use two cables on the downtube, but nonetheless I routed the brake cable underneath the downtube. See pics
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scalpel 29 Ride Report-037-2-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-038-2-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-039-2-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-040-2-.jpg  


  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9
    Thanks, that is helpful!
    I'll set it up this way (if i can get the clamp...)

    JF

  24. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StumpyElite2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    455
    Any of you owns also a Flash Carbon 29er and can provide a comparison to the Scalpel ?

  25. #125
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Afterburner1967 View Post
    I will tell you soon. I got a Flash 29 Ultimate. And got a Scalpel carbon 2 in order.
    NICE !!! Post some pics too

  26. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpyElite2010 View Post
    Any of you owns also a Flash Carbon 29er and can provide a comparison to the Scalpel ?

    I will tell you soon. I got a Flash 29 Ultimate. And got a Scalpel carbon 2 in order.

  27. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nathanbal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,420
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpyElite2010 View Post
    Any of you owns also a Flash Carbon 29er and can provide a comparison to the Scalpel ?
    its just a hardtail vs full-suss comparison. both are excellent bikes - you need to work out what you would use the bike for and whether you want 100mm of rear squish or whether a hardtail is sufficient.

  28. #128
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    I decided to put a little Armor Protection to the Bottom Tube, Head Set and to the Lefty Shock itself . 747mi on her already . Arrow showing signs of wear .
    Here are some pics...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scalpel 29 Ride Report-002.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-003.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-006.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-007.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-009.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-011.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-012.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-014.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-015.jpg  

    Attached Images Attached Images  

  29. #129
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    [QUOTE=Asbury;8826080]I picked up my new Cannondale Scalpel 29 Carbon 1 last Saturday. Wow!

    Asbury..Just curious :...I know you weight in at 175lb. How are you running your front and rear suspension settings if you don't mind saying?

    What is your riding style like?, do you like your suspension settings on the frim side or more plush and why?

    Thanks in advance for your input

  30. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StumpyElite2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanbal View Post
    its just a hardtail vs full-suss comparison. both are excellent bikes - you need to work out what you would use the bike for and whether you want 100mm of rear squish or whether a hardtail is sufficient.
    I have the Flash 29er Carbon 2 and 29er Specialized SJ Expert FSR which is a full suspension with a brain.
    The difference between the 2 bikes is over 8 lbs...so I cannot really compare it.
    I would like to hear how the lightweight FS scalpel compares to the HT Flash.
    A couple of people on another forum saying they rode the scalpel and the flash and were not impressed with the Scalpel...

  31. #131
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpyElite2010 View Post
    I have the Flash 29er Carbon 2 and 29er Specialized SJ Expert FSR which is a full suspension with a brain.
    The difference between the 2 bikes is over 8 lbs...so I cannot really compare it.
    I would like to hear how the lightweight FS scalpel compares to the HT Flash.
    A couple of people on another forum saying they rode the scalpel and the flash and were not impressed with the Scalpel...
    I haven't ridden a Flash but I do own a Stumpy Sworks and an Epic Evo and a Scalpel 1.
    Yes the difference between the Stumpy and any of the two other bikes mentioned is quite a difference. The Stumpy is much more plush, forgiving and slower.
    The Epic and the Scalpel are much more similar. I prefer the Scalpel more than the Epic. I think the lefty shock is superior in what a shock is supposed to do , IMHO it's not even close. The shock just does what it's supposed to do and it doesn't inter fear with the ride. The compliance is more smooth and linear. The Scalpel IMHO also climbs better and is also a tad quicker in steering response. On downhills, IMO, they are very similar, as were I ride here S Florida, downhills are really not an issue.
    I just prefer the stiffness of the frame of the Scalpel in conjunction with the superior suspension of the lefty.
    Hope this helps.

  32. #132
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    BTW, if anyone is undecided about switching out the stock front 2.25 RR for the 2.4 RR, DO IT !!!
    Makes a world of difference, worth every gram in additional weight !!!
    Cornering is Awesome! I'm heavy at 220lb so they work great for me !!!

  33. #133
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by AMCAT View Post
    How have the tri cons been holding up,I'm thinking of buying a set for my flash...sweet ride !!
    If you don't mind the extra weight, I think 1800g, they work great. I'm heavy and ride hard (as opposed to smooth). Over 700 hard miles so far with an occational trip off course into my own trail ... No Problems!!! other than with my riding habbits

  34. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    50
    Torque,

    What material are you using for frame protection? Just curious.. is it a 3M product or something else? I need something like that for my Flash...

    Any help is appreciated!

  35. #135
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Odie-r View Post
    Torque,

    What material are you using for frame protection? Just curious.. is it a 3M product or something else? I need something like that for my Flash...

    Any help is appreciated!
    I know it's a sin , but it's a Specialized product...
    BTW it really works...

  36. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    ordered my scalpel 29er this past week and waiting for delivery. just posting here as i've appreciated reading others' impressions while i wait. this is my first foray into the world of 29ers.

    to say i'm excited would be an understatement!

  37. #137
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    ordered my scalpel 29er this past week and waiting for delivery. just posting here as i've appreciated reading others' impressions while i wait. this is my first foray into the world of 29ers.

    to say i'm excited would be an understatement!
    I hope you don't mind having bugs in you teeth... as your smile will be so big and the speed you'll get will be so great that the bugs won't have a chance to get out of your way and you'll end up with bugs in your teeth!!!

  38. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpyElite2010 View Post
    Any of you owns also a Flash Carbon 29er and can provide a comparison to the Scalpel ?
    That is my question - how do you chose between the flash29er 1/utlimate and the scalpel 29er1?

    What's the the weight difference between the flash 1 and scalpel 1 29ers?

    (I have a 2006 scalpel team bike at the moment and looking to go 29er via flash HT or scalpel 29er. After reading these reports I'm confused between HTail 29er and FS 29er.

  39. #139
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    That is my question - how do you chose between the flash29er 1/utlimate and the scalpel 29er1?

    What's the the weight difference between the flash 1 and scalpel 1 29ers?

    (I have a 2006 scalpel team bike at the moment and looking to go 29er via flash HT or scalpel 29er. After reading these reports I'm confused between HTail 29er and FS 29er.
    I can only give you opinions on the fs bikes I've ridden with lots of seat time, as I have not ridden hardtails enough to give you a fair and earnest opinion to compare the two different bikes.
    As far as the Scalpel 1... weight is from 22lb-23.5lb... Scalpel 2...23-25lb depending on how you equip it... ride between 1 and 2 are very similar to each other, just one is lighter than the other. IMHO, they both rock!!!

  40. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    That is my question - how do you chose between the flash29er 1/utlimate and the scalpel 29er1?

    What's the the weight difference between the flash 1 and scalpel 1 29ers?

    (I have a 2006 scalpel team bike at the moment and looking to go 29er via flash HT or scalpel 29er. After reading these reports I'm confused between HTail 29er and FS 29er.
    why not go scalpel 29er ultimate and make the weight even less an issue?

    stated weight of the 1 is 23.2 and 2 is 24.4, while the ultimate is 21.6 (all large frames w/o pedals).

    i'm guessing the ultimate could be built up in the low-20s fairly easily (add sealant but remove tubes, lighter post, bars, brakes), but getting under 20 would probably take some serious work.

  41. #141
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    why not go scalpel 29er ultimate and make the weight even less an issue?

    stated weight of the 1 is 23.2 and 2 is 24.4, while the ultimate is 21.6 (all large frames w/o pedals).

    i'm guessing the ultimate could be built up in the low-20s fairly easily (add sealant but remove tubes, lighter post, bars, brakes), but getting under 20 would probably take some serious work.
    +1, I agree, if the Ultimate is with-in budget... Than It's a No-Brainer!!!
    ULTIMATE ALL THE WAY!!!

  42. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    can anyone tell me which, specifically, shimano xtr front derailleur is compatible with the scalpel 29er 2x10?

    is it the FD-M985-E (with the BB-plate removed), or the FD-M985-E2?

    i imagine it is NOT the FD-M986-D.

    i'm thinking it would be the M985-E2 (designed for 38-40T chainrings, but it only is rated 12T capacity, vs the M985-E @ 40-44T/14T capacity).

    thank you!

    EDIT: the scalpel 29er manual states the following which suggests it is the -E(2) version i'm after: "Both frames (carbon and alloy) utilize a direct mount adapter (i.e. SRAM S3 or Shimano E-Type without a BB plate)." however, it does not state M985-E or -E2.

  43. #143
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by briandwyer View Post
    Can this be used for a larger (220lb) rider out east where it is rocky and rooty? I don't want to spend this much money if I'm going to shred the bike. I do mostly trail riding - just a little concerned about the durability.....can anyone advise me? Thanks
    No worries... I weigh same as you... I got three carbon bikes and never had an issue... BTW.. I tend to go off on my own trails now and then when I hit a tree or ?
    So it's all good...

  44. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Well I puleld the trigger and just secured a carbon scalpel 29er 1 in size large. I've been out of the game for 6 years (I have a 2006 team scalpel) and so forgive me if I ask questions about products everyone else knows about already.

    I want to make it a super light race bike and so thought of the following:

    1. Buy a set of Enve race wheels for racing only - they seem to be the best. Are they? Should I just ask enve to replicate the flash 29er wheels? What cassette should I buy - are there ti mtb cassettes?

    2. What parts can I replace to reduce it's weight? Stem?, bars? (whats the trend with race bars now - they seem really wide??) tyres? Is the tubliss debate over?

    3. What cool mods can be done to this bike ? Replace the brakes with better/lighter? Rear shock - does it need the kashima coating treatment? Can I mod the lefty to make it lighter with ti internals? (not sure whats in there now)

    4. What about little svelt components? quick releases etc? Are there uber light and durable ones out there now? Pedals - are egg beaters still the business or have other brands come along?

    Really sorry for the numeorus questions but seriously you guys know these bikes back to front and know the accessories that work so I'm all ears.

    Thanks

  45. #145
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    A few changes to my Scalpel...

    MRP 36t ring and spider set...
    MRP chain guide...
    XX rear derailer again...
    Racing Ralphs 2.4fr & 2.5Snake Skins rr tires...
    Re-did tubeless set-up...

    Rides great with the MRP change and with the new wider tires in the front, it rails ...

    22lb 9oz...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scalpel 29 Ride Report-006-4-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-009-5-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-012-4-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-001-3-.jpg  

    Scalpel 29 Ride Report-002-5-.jpg  


  46. #146
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    Well I puleld the trigger and just secured a carbon scalpel 29er 1 in size large. I've been out of the game for 6 years (I have a 2006 team scalpel) and so forgive me if I ask questions about products everyone else knows about already.

    I want to make it a super light race bike and so thought of the following:

    1. Buy a set of Enve race wheels for racing only - they seem to be the best. Are they? Should I just ask enve to replicate the flash 29er wheels? What cassette should I buy - are there ti mtb cassettes?

    2. What parts can I replace to reduce it's weight? Stem?, bars? (whats the trend with race bars now - they seem really wide??) tyres? Is the tubliss debate over?

    3. What cool mods can be done to this bike ? Replace the brakes with better/lighter? Rear shock - does it need the kashima coating treatment? Can I mod the lefty to make it lighter with ti internals? (not sure whats in there now)

    4. What about little svelt components? quick releases etc? Are there uber light and durable ones out there now? Pedals - are egg beaters still the business or have other brands come along?

    Really sorry for the numeorus questions but seriously you guys know these bikes back to front and know the accessories that work so I'm all ears.

    Thanks
    1. Yes the Enves are a great set... Project 321 has a great set w/ an awesome hub-set
    1550gr vs 1850gr stock.. savings= 300gr

    2. Tubeless conversion... savings= 160gr

    3. FSA K-Force Light Super-K Flatbars 670mm are 130gr vs 180gr stock... savings= 50gr

    4. XTR Race Brake M985 210gr but Magura MT8 Disc Brake 195gr, both really work are awesome too vs 288gr stock... savings= 78gr

    5. Eggbeaters 11 titanium 174gr ... N/A

    6. Fizik Cyrano Carbon Seatpost 193gr vs 221gr stock... savings= 28gr

    7. Selle SLR Tekno Carbon Seat 85gr vs 190gr stock... savings= 105gr

    8. XX SRAM XG-1099 Cassette 186gr vs 229gr... savings= 44gr

    Total Savings= 765gr - pedals (174gr)= Total... 591gr = 1lb 4.8oz

    I'm sure there are other places to shave more weight off but this is a quick expensive start, I think the savings in weight are pretty accurate but check for yourself
    A you can see all the components listed above are lighter than the stock components but very important to me, just as durable... Problem is $$$, isn't always !!!

  47. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    1. Yes the Enves are a great set... Project 321 has a great set w/ an awesome hub-set
    1550gr vs 1850gr stock.. savings= 300gr

    2. Tubeless conversion... savings= 160gr

    3. FSA K-Force Light Super-K Flatbars 670mm are 130gr vs 180gr stock... savings= 50gr

    4. XTR Race Brake M985 210gr but Magura MT8 Disc Brake 195gr, both really work are awesome too vs 288gr stock... savings= 78gr

    5. Eggbeaters 11 titanium 174gr ... N/A

    6. Fizik Cyrano Carbon Seatpost 193gr vs 221gr stock... savings= 28gr

    7. Selle SLR Tekno Carbon Seat 85gr vs 190gr stock... savings= 105gr

    8. XX SRAM XG-1099 Cassette 186gr vs 229gr... savings= 44gr

    Total Savings= 765gr - pedals (174gr)= Total... 591gr = 1lb 4.8oz

    I'm sure there are other places to shave more weight off but this is a quick expensive start, I think the savings in weight are pretty accurate but check for yourself
    A you can see all the components listed above are lighter than the stock components but very important to me, just as durable... Problem is $$$, isn't always !!!
    T29 - thankyou so much.

    Really appreciate your awesome effort to provide me with info.

  48. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    T29 - thankyou so much.

    Really appreciate your awesome effort to provide me with info.
    here are a couple additional thoughts for what i'm going to do with my build (ulty...). i'm looking to get it <21 pounds (with power meter & durable parts). <=20.5 would be a dream but not sure if it is reality.

    - replace xtr race w/ r1's from another bike. r1s (hose, lever, caliper) are around 165g for one.
    - masterpiece seatpost, cut to length & Ti hardware is about 170g
    - easton xc 70 wide bars -- lighter, wider, cheaper than the k-forces.
    - saddle...i'm sticking with what works. i'll give the tundra 00 a shot but will probably stick with a valcon carbon. not a great place to save weight (IMO) unless it really suits
    - pedals: i like time ATAC pedals...you can get the Ti version. not a fan of the eggbeaters myself, though they are light.
    - enve wheels, tubeless (as torque29er wrote)

    probably saves 100g or so more than what torque29er wrote, aside from the pedals and saddle.

    i'm concerned with durability AND weight.

    there are other options for lighter cables, perhaps tuning some bolts, lighter grips and rotors. you can pick up another 100g or so of savings there.

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    T29 - thankyou so much.

    Really appreciate your awesome effort to provide me with info.
    I'm a lighter (153 lbs) 29er rider. I went with I9 Ultralights and saved some $$, but Enve would be a great choice.

    The stock cassette is a SRAM 1070 (Competitive Cyclist: "actual weight= 290 gms"). I switched to a SRAM XX 1099 (Competitive Cyclist: "actual weight= 186 gms").

    My other changes include ESI grips, Raven tire out back, and SLR saddle. I opted to run Xpedo Ti/Ti pedals I had from another bike.

    I cut down the stock bars, left the post and brakes alone. I might swap these out for lighter options later.

    You won't have to worry about quick releases on these wheels.

  50. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    Well I puleld the trigger and just secured a carbon scalpel 29er 1 in size large. I've been out of the game for 6 years (I have a 2006 team scalpel) and so forgive me if I ask questions about products everyone else knows about already.

    I want to make it a super light race bike and so thought of the following:

    1. Buy a set of Enve race wheels for racing only - they seem to be the best. Are they? Should I just ask enve to replicate the flash 29er wheels? What cassette should I buy - are there ti mtb cassettes?

    2. What parts can I replace to reduce it's weight? Stem?, bars? (whats the trend with race bars now - they seem really wide??) tyres? Is the tubliss debate over?

    3. What cool mods can be done to this bike ? Replace the brakes with better/lighter? Rear shock - does it need the kashima coating treatment? Can I mod the lefty to make it lighter with ti internals? (not sure whats in there now)

    4. What about little svelt components? quick releases etc? Are there uber light and durable ones out there now? Pedals - are egg beaters still the business or have other brands come along?

    Really sorry for the numeorus questions but seriously you guys know these bikes back to front and know the accessories that work so I'm all ears.

    Thanks
    I have a scalpel 2 that I have done the following mods to:

    formula R1 brakes/ rotors
    titec pluto 660 bar, foam grips
    hollowgram crankset
    selle italia carbon saddle
    kcnc post
    "nancy racing" carbon wheelset stock lefty front hub/dt swiss 240 rear. 1530grams
    ikons mounted tubeless
    xx cassette

    with no pedals its 21.7lbs and 22.2 with my exustar pedals.

  51. #151
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    here are a couple additional thoughts for what i'm going to do with my build (ulty...). i'm looking to get it <21 pounds (with power meter & durable parts). <=20.5 would be a dream but not sure if it is reality.

    - replace xtr race w/ r1's from another bike. r1s (hose, lever, caliper) are around 165g for one.
    - masterpiece seatpost, cut to length & Ti hardware is about 170g
    - easton xc 70 wide bars -- lighter, wider, cheaper than the k-forces.
    - saddle...i'm sticking with what works. i'll give the tundra 00 a shot but will probably stick with a valcon carbon. not a great place to save weight (IMO) unless it really suits
    - pedals: i like time ATAC pedals...you can get the Ti version. not a fan of the eggbeaters myself, though they are light.
    - enve wheels, tubeless (as torque29er wrote)

    probably saves 100g or so more than what torque29er wrote, aside from the pedals and saddle.

    i'm concerned with durability AND weight.

    there are other options for lighter cables, perhaps tuning some bolts, lighter grips and rotors. you can pick up another 100g or so of savings there.
    1. Thank You "Rovertd"... I stand corrected... The actual weight on the 1070casette is 290gr..

    2. Also the FSA bar is also lighter at 120gr for 670mm than I posted...
    ...BTW the FSA bar is lighter than the same size Easton bar..From Easton's own site..."EC70 Wide is a full 685-milimeters in width, making it just the right partner for grunting up steep climbs. And at just 150-grams, the EC70 XC Wide is still wicked light! ".

    Either way you go it's still very light...

    Total Savings= 835gr - pedals (174gr)= Total... 661gr = 1lb 7.3oz :thumbsup

  52. #152
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by utah joe View Post
    I have a scalpel 2 that I have done the following mods to:

    formula R1 brakes/ rotors
    titec pluto 660 bar, foam grips
    hollowgram crankset
    selle italia carbon saddle
    kcnc post
    "nancy racing" carbon wheelset stock lefty front hub/dt swiss 240 rear. 1530grams
    ikons mounted tubeless
    xx cassette

    with no pedals its 21.7lbs and 22.2 with my exustar pedals.
    Which exustar pedals do you use?

  53. #153
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    1. Thank You "Rovertd"... I stand corrected... The actual weight on the 1070casette is 290gr..

    2. Also the FSA bar is also lighter at 120gr for 670mm than I posted...
    ...BTW the FSA bar is lighter than the same size Easton bar..From Easton's own site..."EC70 Wide is a full 685-milimeters in width, making it just the right partner for grunting up steep climbs. And at just 150-grams, the EC70 XC Wide is still wicked light! ".

    Either way you go it's still very light...

    Total Savings= 835gr - pedals (174gr)= Total... 661gr = 1lb 7.3oz :thumbsup
    all reports are that the FSA's actual weights are heavier than stated, on the order of 145-160g when they actually hit production for several models that were quoted as 125. they are also 600mm wide (vs the easton's 685). i suspect if you cut the eastons down to 600 then you'd drop 15g or so. easton's 590mm ec90 xc is 110g, for reference.

    you are right about the ec70--the chart below that shows 125g (Easton Cycling, so i guess there is some confusion.

    i have a set of ec90 SL's that come in at around 120-125g, but they are a bit narrower (635 vs 685mm).

    food for thought. not sure if 590mm is wide enough for a 29er.

    my scalpel comes with enve bars that are 700mm wide and a stated 175g. hm. i'll have to think about what i wanted to do. i was sure i'd ditch them for the EC70 XC wides @ 125, but if they are 150 i'm not so sure.

  54. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    Looked up the eggies - they are wickedly awesome !!!

    Looking up the seat now.

    Thanks
    eggbeaters are super-duper-light...but i know of too many failures for me to rely on them where i ride.

  55. #155
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    1. Yes the Enves are a great set... Project 321 has a great set w/ an awesome hub-set
    1550gr vs 1850gr stock.. savings= 300gr

    2. Tubeless conversion... savings= 160gr

    3. FSA K-Force Light Super-K Flatbars 670mm are 130gr vs 180gr stock... savings= 50gr

    4. XTR Race Brake M985 210gr but Magura MT8 Disc Brake 195gr, both really work are awesome too vs 288gr stock... savings= 78gr

    5. Eggbeaters 11 titanium 174gr ... N/A

    6. Fizik Cyrano Carbon Seatpost 193gr vs 221gr stock... savings= 28gr

    7. Selle SLR Tekno Carbon Seat 85gr vs 190gr stock... savings= 105gr

    8. XX SRAM XG-1099 Cassette 186gr vs 229gr... savings= 44gr

    Total Savings= 765gr - pedals (174gr)= Total... 591gr = 1lb 4.8oz

    I'm sure there are other places to shave more weight off but this is a quick expensive start, I think the savings in weight are pretty accurate but check for yourself
    A you can see all the components listed above are lighter than the stock components but very important to me, just as durable... Problem is $$$, isn't always !!!
    Looked up the eggies - they are wickedly awesome !!!

    Looking up the seat now.

    Thanks

  56. #156
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    all reports are that the FSA's actual weights are heavier than stated, on the order of 145-160g when they actually hit production for several models that were quoted as 125. they are also 600mm wide (vs the easton's 685). i suspect if you cut the eastons down to 600 then you'd drop 15g or so. easton's 590mm ec90 xc is 110g, for reference.

    you are right about the ec70--the chart below that shows 125g (Easton Cycling, so i guess there is some confusion.

    i have a set of ec90 SL's that come in at around 120-125g, but they are a bit narrower (635 vs 685mm).

    food for thought. not sure if 590mm is wide enough for a 29er.

    my scalpel comes with enve bars that are 700mm wide and a stated 175g. hm. i'll have to think about what i wanted to do. i was sure i'd ditch them for the EC70 XC wides @ 125, but if they are 150 i'm not so sure.
    Can one of you guys comment on the wide bars that seem so common now?

    I'm used to what I think are narrow ritchley world cup carbon bars (stock on my old 2006 team scalpel)

    Does anyone use carbon 29er bars or aren't they light enought?

    Can you run 26er type bars on 29er?

    Loving this thread btw. It's awesome

  57. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    eggbeaters are super-duper-light...but i know of too many failures for me to rely on them where i ride.
    I'm starting to see your view on them - on a race on last Sunday my pedals were so hard to get into. Part of my problem is too many road riding miles and a short length pedal axel if you know what I mean. On Sunday once I started moving the foot over the eggies were easier to get into.

    I've not had a problem with mine but have heard of issues before.

  58. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    Which exustar pedals do you use?
    These ones, 230ish grms

    EXUSTAR2011

  59. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    247
    I assume people are cracking wise about 26er vs 29er bars. You can run whatever you want. I ran some EC 90 bars for a long time that were only 560mm wide (claimed 99 gm weight). I then switched to 580 Ti and carbon bars on my 29ers because 560 feels pretty narrow towards the end of endurance races.
    I cut the stock carbon TruVativ on my Scalpel 1 from 700mm down to ~600mm just to try a little wider (it is damn hard to glue them back together).
    I've test ridden a bunch of bikes with the "All mountain. I'm a badass wide bars" and turns out that this wimpy, XC rider don't need big bars smacking off of trees.

  60. #160
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by scalpel2007 View Post
    Can one of you guys comment on the wide bars that seem so common now?

    I'm used to what I think are narrow ritchley world cup carbon bars (stock on my old 2006 team scalpel)

    Does anyone use carbon 29er bars or aren't they light enought?

    Can you run 26er type bars on 29er?

    Loving this thread btw. It's awesome
    the only different part you NEED on a 29er are the wheels/tires. otherwise, everything is the same. (well, except for the saddle, of course, you NEED a different saddle as 26er saddles just don't work on 29ers.)

    that said, it seems that SOME people prefer wider bars for more leverage on bigger wheels. others don't.

    i used to ride really wide bars on my 26er but started riding trails with narrower openings. i've been riding a 635mm wide set (low rise) of bars for a while.

    the stock (flat) bars on the scalpel i ordered are 700mm. i might cut them...but i also ordered a set of flat bars to try @ 590.

    the answer for you is: it depends. it's safer to buy something wider and cut them down when you are sure, rather than go too narrow.

  61. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by Rovertd View Post
    A 29er fork is also a pretty good thing to have on a 29er frame.
    nah...overrated. what's a little tire rub? ;-)

  62. #162
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    247
    A 29er fork is also a pretty good thing to have on a 29er frame.

  63. #163
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    all reports are that the FSA's actual weights are heavier than stated, on the order of 145-160g when they actually hit production for several models that were quoted as 125. they are also 600mm wide (vs the easton's 685). i suspect if you cut the eastons down to 600 then you'd drop 15g or so. easton's 590mm ec90 xc is 110g, for reference.

    you are right about the ec70--the chart below that shows 125g (Easton Cycling, so i guess there is some confusion.

    i have a set of ec90 SL's that come in at around 120-125g, but they are a bit narrower (635 vs 685mm).

    food for thought. not sure if 590mm is wide enough for a 29er.

    my scalpel comes with enve bars that are 700mm wide and a stated 175g. hm. i'll have to think about what i wanted to do. i was sure i'd ditch them for the EC70 XC wides @ 125, but if they are 150 i'm not so sure.
    From FSA website:

    DESCRIPTION & MATERIALS
    • Unique FSA drop center design
    • Textured for control and stem grip
    SIZE
    • Ø31.8 x W600mm, W670mm
    • 600mm wide, 6 degree backsweep w/ 0 upsweep
    FINISH
    • UD Carbon Finish
    • Color graphics
    WEIGHT
    • 109 g...This has to be for the 600mm


    Bikes Online Website:

    SPECIFICATIONS:

    sub-model: Flat Bar
    material: UD carbon
    handlebar type: MTB
    width: 670mm width
    angle: 6 degree bend
    center diameter: 31.8mm diameter
    engraving: FSA logo
    color: carbon
    weight: 120gm... Hope this is true
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Product Description
    •Carbon/Kevlar composite construction
    •Full width flat-top design with reinforced clamping zones
    •120 grams... Hope this is true

    I'll post the actual weight as I have one coming in this week, I'll let you know. Sometimes manufactures, manufacture their own weight calculations.

    Hopefully it will be as they post...

  64. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    From FSA website:

    DESCRIPTION & MATERIALS
    • Unique FSA drop center design
    • Textured for control and stem grip
    SIZE
    • Ø31.8 x W600mm, W670mm
    • 600mm wide, 6 degree backsweep w/ 0 upsweep
    FINISH
    • UD Carbon Finish
    • Color graphics
    WEIGHT
    • 109 g...This has to be for the 600mm


    Bikes Online Website:

    SPECIFICATIONS:

    sub-model: Flat Bar
    material: UD carbon
    handlebar type: MTB
    width: 670mm width
    angle: 6 degree bend
    center diameter: 31.8mm diameter
    engraving: FSA logo
    color: carbon
    weight: 120gm... Hope this is true
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Product Description
    •Carbon/Kevlar composite construction
    •Full width flat-top design with reinforced clamping zones
    •120 grams... Hope this is true

    I'll post the actual weight as I have one coming in this week, I'll let you know. Sometimes manufactures, manufacture their own weight calculations.

    Hopefully it will be as they post...
    the FSA stated weights have pretty much been shown to be very optimistic or apply to earlier (non-sustainable) versions. be curious to see what yours are.

  65. #165
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    the FSA stated weights have pretty much been shown to be very optimistic or apply to earlier (non-sustainable) versions. be curious to see what yours are.
    I wondering myself Hopefully they did bull sh!t me on this one..

  66. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    I wondering myself Hopefully they did bull sh!t me on this one..
    i'm just posting again to see if you can use more icons in your next post. there are some you have not yet used in this thread.

  67. #167
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    i'm just posting again to see if you can use more icons in your next post. there are some you have not yet used in this thread.

  68. #168
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    93

    Lefty out of the box

    Id be interested to hear how "sticky" your Lefty was out of the box? I have a new Scalpel 1 and the fork feels very "sticky" right now. Granted it is at Zero hours so it might break in??

    Any thoughts appreciated.

  69. #169
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by utah joe View Post
    I have a scalpel 2 that I have done the following mods to:

    formula R1 brakes/ rotors
    titec pluto 660 bar, foam grips
    hollowgram crankset
    selle italia carbon saddle
    kcnc post
    "nancy racing" carbon wheelset stock lefty front hub/dt swiss 240 rear. 1530grams
    ikons mounted tubeless
    xx cassette

    with no pedals its 21.7lbs and 22.2 with my exustar pedals.
    Thanks for posting this. I am really considering a scalpel 2 and was thinking of a few of these exact upgrades. This gives me a good idea of what is possible.

  70. #170
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    I wondering myself Hopefully they did bull sh!t me on this one..
    FYI:
    EC70 XC wide weighed in at 160g - 685mm
    EC90 flat weighed in at 120g - 590mm
    EC90 low rise: 135g - 635mm (sorry, initially type 127g, which was the weight for another part)

    all are 31.8 clamp size.
    Last edited by tetonrider2; 04-26-2012 at 08:59 PM.

  71. #171
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    7
    I just got a 2 and the lefty was instantly plush. I felt guilty and thought it needed more pressure. The bike is ridiculously smooth and effortlessly fast.

  72. #172
    PHS
    PHS is offline
    Rider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    90
    What are Scalpel 2's going for out the door? Anybody heard of any frame issues?

  73. #173
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by tetonrider2 View Post
    FYI:
    EC70 XC wide weighed in at 160g - 685mm
    EC90 flat weighed in at 120g - 590mm
    EC90 low rise: 135g - 635mm (sorry, initially type 127g, which was the weight for another part)

    all are 31.8 clamp size.
    I'll post the weight as soon as it arrives...
    More icons for you...

  74. #174
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    +1 ... My shock was completely smooth from the first ride...

    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  75. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    582
    Quote Originally Posted by MTBguru71 View Post
    I just got a 2 and the lefty was instantly plush. I felt guilty and thought it needed more pressure. The bike is ridiculously smooth and effortlessly fast.
    Heh heh! Coming from my other bike (Fox floats) I keep thinking the Lefty needs more air as well. It's so easy to compress for the first few cm - I usually get off to check it and am really surprised that I can't bottom it out. The lack of stiction for the first couple of cm makes quite a difference (and when you think about it, that's where your fork is doing the majority of its work)

  76. #176
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by MTBguru71 View Post
    I just got a 2 and the lefty was instantly plush. I felt guilty and thought it needed more pressure. The bike is ridiculously smooth and effortlessly fast.
    Congrats to you !!!, it's an AWESOME bike!!! Post some pics as soon as your able... All I can say about the "Lefty" is that it impresses you more, the more you ride it...

    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  77. #177
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by jimification View Post
    Heh heh! Coming from my other bike (Fox floats) I keep thinking the Lefty needs more air as well. It's so easy to compress for the first few cm - I usually get off to check it and am really surprised that I can't bottom it out. The lack of stiction for the first couple of cm makes quite a difference (and when you think about it, that's where your fork is doing the majority of its work)
    +1...

  78. #178
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by wsmc42 View Post
    Thanks for posting this. I am really considering a scalpel 2 and was thinking of a few of these exact upgrades. This gives me a good idea of what is possible.
    Go for it, you won't be sorry!!! ... Get ready for some real speed !!!

    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  79. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    102
    Reading through the thread some question arises over the xc race bike pedigree of this bike, so is any of the cannondale team racing it this season? I quick scan on the internets yielded little conclusion other that than Bishop (?) using it in a long distance event. Maybe I missed it.

  80. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    93

    Finished

    My Scalpel 29er complete came in at 21.4 pounds, medium.

    -All XX w/WC brakes
    -Enve Bar and post
    -Stans Race Gold wheels w/S-works LK tires tubeless
    -Shimano XTR pedals
    -Reynolds carbon cage
    -Ti bolts where necessary

    Ride report to come!

  81. #181
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by trukweaz View Post
    My Scalpel 29er complete came in at 21.4 pounds, medium.

    -All XX w/WC brakes
    -Enve Bar and post
    -Stans Race Gold wheels w/S-works LK tires tubeless
    -Shimano XTR pedals
    -Reynolds carbon cage
    -Ti bolts where necessary

    Ride report to come!
    Awesome !!!
    Lightest Scalpel 29 post I've seen
    Post some pics...

    ENJOY THE RIDE !!!

  82. #182
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinner View Post
    Reading through the thread some question arises over the xc race bike pedigree of this bike, so is any of the cannondale team racing it this season? I quick scan on the internets yielded little conclusion other that than Bishop (?) using it in a long distance event. Maybe I missed it.
    I've pretty much looked at the thread myself, and whats your point?
    Other than people posting how happy they are with their bikes , how light they've been able to get it down to , and an occasional racer that uses the bike for racing , I really haven't seen anybody refer to any factory team racing issues.
    The fact is, the bike is really fast and the suspension works exceptionally well. That's pretty much what you can get from the majority of the postings...

    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  83. #183
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    119
    Can anyone advise what options are available to hop up the lefty 29er fork and fix shock on the scalpel 29er 1?

    My experience is with a fox lefty terra logic which a lot of people said were sub optimal.

    Can anyone explain the features on the suspension on the 29er 1 ?

    Thanks scalpel team!!

  84. #184
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    7
    My scalpel 29 2 Medium weighs 24.5 with candy 11 pedals and a heavy koobi seat. I did change the seat post, bars and went with XTR brakes and XTR shifters.

    I have I9's coming wed to set up tubeless and the xx cassette should have it close to 23.

    We weighed the Scalpel 29 Ultimate stock Large with heavy platform pedals at 22.9 and the medium Ultimate stock without pedals at 22.2.

  85. #185
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dancruz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    507
    I'm not sure about a Fox Lefty..But I'm not digging mine on my new Scalpel 1. Can't find the plush spot. I tried 80,90,95,100,105,110 pressures and it just seems like its stiff all the time.Also I need more rake for the nasty downhill stuff out here in CO. I'm back to feeling I'm going to do a header again. Maybe since its a true racebike I need to sell and start over....
    Just ride and quit bit$hin.......Yeti SB5+..SIR9 SS...CD Synapse DA...

  86. #186
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by dancruz View Post
    I'm not sure about a Fox Lefty..But I'm not digging mine on my new Scalpel 1. Can't find the plush spot. I tried 80,90,95,100,105,110 pressures and it just seems like its stiff all the time.Also I need more rake for the nasty downhill stuff out here in CO. I'm back to feeling I'm going to do a header again. Maybe since its a true racebike I need to sell and start over....
    The Scalpel is definitely not a downhill bike...
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  87. #187
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    I've pretty much looked at the thread myself, and whats your point?
    Other than people posting how happy they are with their bikes , how light they've been able to get it down to , and an occasional racer that uses the bike for racing , I really haven't seen anybody refer to any factory team racing issues.
    The fact is, the bike is really fast and the suspension works exceptionally well. That's pretty much what you can get from the majority of the postings...

    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!
    The point is not whether people on the thread think the bike is a light or fast etc, the question is whether any pros are racing it.

  88. #188
    change is good
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,532
    Mine felt the same way. I upped the pressure to 135 from 120 and it felt much better. Wierd. I weigh 225lb.

  89. #189
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinner View Post
    The point is not whether people on the thread think the bike is a light or fast etc, the question is whether any pros are racing it.
    And where are the people posting it that it's being raced by many or any pro's.
    And what does it matter?
    Remember, it's a brand new bike too.
    Sorry but I don't understand what you mean ?
    Last edited by torque29er; 05-02-2012 at 06:14 AM.
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  90. #190
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by torque29er View Post
    And where are the people posting it that it's being raced by many or any pro's.
    Sorry but I don't understand what you mean ?
    I'll spell it out for you:

    Q: Do any cannondale pros race the Scalpel 29er?

    Possible answers: All, some, none, only for certain races etc etc

    Point of the question: If no pros race the bike then what does this say about the bike? Simple.

  91. #191
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinner View Post
    Point of the question: If no pros race the bike then what does this say about the bike? Simple.
    Doesnt Tim Johnson use one? I know he did for Leadville at least....That said, buying bikes based on what top level pros do/use is pretty silly.

  92. #192
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinner View Post
    I'll spell it out for you:

    Q: Do any cannondale pros race the Scalpel 29er?

    Possible answers: All, some, none, only for certain races etc etc

    Point of the question: If no pros race the bike then what does this say about the bike? Simple.
    Buy a bike because you like it , not because a manufacturer paid an individual or individuals to race their product. Whether the pro likes it or not is irrelevant to him as long the money is there. After the contract is over, another manufacturer pays them more money and so now that's the best bike. I don't think so, at that level, it's ALL about the BENJAMINS!!! ...

    Do you think that the bike wins the races or the guys who ride them?

    If your going to buy a bike based upon whether or not a pro races it,
    then you should inform all bike manufacturers to shut production of most of what they build. You'll be doing them a favor and saving them tons of money.

    Remember, the most important thing is to find a bike "YOU" like , forget about what others think, and go ride the friggen thing like a happy madman!!!
    Last edited by torque29er; 05-02-2012 at 06:54 AM.
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  93. #193
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by DrDon View Post
    Mine felt the same way. I upped the pressure to 135 from 120 and it felt much better. Wierd. I weigh 225lb.
    Wow do you guys read the setup documentation? at 225 you should be running around 155 in your fork to even be kinda close. You want 20-25% sag. So the BALLPARK is to use 70% of your total weight. Then measure and adjust from there.

    at 225 running 120lbs that fork had to of been a mess. Even at 135 its still way to low.

    Im 165 and I run 70% weight, ie 115lbs and its pretty much perfect 20% for me. And I love it, coming from a fox its amazing better.


    For the rear I actually run 5lbs more than my weight, again right at 20%. I just finished Cohutta on it and have been doing a lot of 100mile rides, and the 20% sag on this bike feels better to me.


    And BTW, ive got 2400 miles on this bike since I got it at Xmas, so im not just some random poster. Ive ridden everything from Ouachita Challenge to pre-riding Syllamo a few times. Meaning very technical to 14k Climbing at Choutta. I really like this bike.

  94. #194
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by zeeke View Post
    Wow do you guys read the setup documentation? at 225 you should be running around 155 in your fork to even be kinda close. You want 20-25% sag. So the BALLPARK is to use 70% of your total weight. Then measure and adjust from there.

    at 225 running 120lbs that fork had to of been a mess. Even at 135 its still way to low.

    Im 165 and I run 70% weight, ie 115lbs and its pretty much perfect 20% for me. And I love it, coming from a fox its amazing better.


    For the rear I actually run 5lbs more than my weight, again right at 20%. I just finished Cohutta on it and have been doing a lot of 100mile rides, and the 20% sag on this bike feels better to me.


    And BTW, ive got 2400 miles on this bike since I got it at Xmas, so im not just some random poster. Ive ridden everything from Ouachita Challenge to pre-riding Syllamo a few times. Meaning very technical to 14k Climbing at Choutta. I really like this bike.

    Spot on advice and also stated in many fork manuals exactly the same ratio.

  95. #195
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by zeeke View Post
    Wow do you guys read the setup documentation? at 225 you should be running around 155 in your fork to even be kinda close. You want 20-25% sag. So the BALLPARK is to use 70% of your total weight. Then measure and adjust from there.

    at 225 running 120lbs that fork had to of been a mess. Even at 135 its still way to low.

    Im 165 and I run 70% weight, ie 115lbs and its pretty much perfect 20% for me. And I love it, coming from a fox its amazing better.


    For the rear I actually run 5lbs more than my weight, again right at 20%. I just finished Cohutta on it and have been doing a lot of 100mile rides, and the 20% sag on this bike feels better to me.


    And BTW, ive got 2400 miles on this bike since I got it at Xmas, so im not just some random poster. Ive ridden everything from Ouachita Challenge to pre-riding Syllamo a few times. Meaning very technical to 14k Climbing at Choutta. I really like this bike.
    +1 on that zeeke , I weigh 220lb and running 175lb and it's great for my riding style !!!
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  96. #196
    PHS
    PHS is offline
    Rider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    90
    What changes has anybody made to the scalpel 2 to shave weight?
    Last edited by PHS; 05-04-2012 at 10:57 AM. Reason: .

  97. #197
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nathanbal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,420
    Pro's will use a hardtail almost every time unless they can prove the full suss is quicker. They are not like you, me or anyone (generally) on the forum... they are super light, incredibly powerful and have the skills of a downhill champ. Riding a hardtail on terrain were most FREDs would think a 6" trail bike is required, is nothing to them. Comparing what they use to your buying decision is DUMB.

  98. #198
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanbal View Post
    Pro's will use a hardtail almost every time unless they can prove the full suss is quicker. They are not like you, me or anyone (generally) on the forum... they are super light, incredibly powerful and have the skills of a downhill champ. Riding a hardtail on terrain were most FREDs would think a 6" trail bike is required, is nothing to them. Comparing what they use to your buying decision is DUMB.
    +1... Completely agree with that...
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

  99. #199
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    42
    Yep, I was in race a couple weeks ago where the Pro Cat group were mostly hard tails.
    I was the the 50+ Cat 3 this time, ( a safe choice) which had a little bit of everything but mostly fs.
    The Scalpel is a screaming XC bike, that I am loving on the downhill as well as on the climb.
    Not plush like my Rise 1, but still way more control when going fast and rough on the down.

  100. #200
    "THE RIDE IS MY CHURCH"
    Reputation: torque29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Aminnow View Post
    Yep, I was in race a couple weeks ago where the Pro Cat group were mostly hard tails.
    I was the the 50+ Cat 3 this time, ( a safe choice) which had a little bit of everything but mostly fs.
    The Scalpel is a screaming XC bike, that I am loving on the downhill as well as on the climb.
    Not plush like my Rise 1, but still way more control when going fast and rough on the down.
    +1 on that ...Man, I luv my Scalpel too...
    ENJOY THE RIDE!!!

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-24-2011, 03:38 PM
  2. Anyone ride the 2011 scalpel yet?
    By guvna in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 06-27-2011, 12:46 AM
  3. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-14-2007, 07:02 PM
  4. From Scalpel to Rush. the first ride...
    By Anders in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-11-2006, 07:46 AM
  5. 1st ride on my Scalpel..this season
    By subzero in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 05:01 PM

Members who have read this thread: 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •