Results 1 to 78 of 78
  1. #1
    Flow
    Reputation: Hermes475's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    85

    yelli screamy sizing?

    I am 5' 11" 160lbs and have a 33 inch inseam. I currently ride a size M Salsa Big Mama and really like the way it fits (ETT of 23.5, 100mm stem and 18" seat tube). I decided I wanted to ride a hard tail again (used to have a L Mamasita ETT of 24.5" ) and the YS made the short list of 29er frames with short chainstays. However, I cannot decide what size YS to get. The L YS has a top tube of 24.5 and I am afraid it will be too long. I felt the 24.5" ETT of my old Mamasita was too long for me and ended up running a 60mm stem to get the cockpit to where it felt good. The M YS has the proper ETT but with 16.5" seat tube I am worried about getting enough seat post extension for proper pedaling. I would be running the frame with a reverb dropper post. My calculations show that I should be able to get enough extension on the M frame but I will be uncomfortably close to the minimum insertion point on the post. Ideally I would test ride the different sizes but realistically that is probably not going to happen (Anyone with a M or L YS in Blacksburg, VA that they would be willing to let me briefly test ride?). So what size YS are people with longish legs and shortish torsos running?

    Thanks,

    -Brett

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    251
    I think the effective seat tube angle and thereby the effective top tube distance is a bit miss leading on the YS. The seattube does not directly attach to the BB but is welded to the bottom tube a few inches up the bottom bracket. So instead of having a 73 degree seat angle the ST is actually 70.5 meaning the seat will be back a bit farther than you are expecting especially when the seat is set high.

    I am still getting to know my YS but my early impressions is that this is not the best butt-on-seat ride.

    I am 6'0" and I am running a 140mm, with a relatively high stack, 50mm stem with 30 inch bars and I love the slacker effect on this ride. Given the rider weight/mass is towards the back its easy to get the front wheel up. As a result I am more aggressive flowing into the steeper stuff than I have been with other 29ers.

    I find myself riding more out of the saddle than on so I can attack the terrain. With the short wheelbase and chain length the YS very responsive and acts more like a 26er but with the added ability to roll over the small stuff.

    I am still running my summer tires (low tread) so I yet to attack corners given the recent wet weather in the Seattle area. I am waiting for some Specialized Purgatory Controls to arrive at my LBS.
    Last edited by jdusto; 10-11-2011 at 02:07 PM. Reason: poor grammer
    The quiver: 2010 Santa Cruz Nomad, 2011 Specialized Demo II, 2011 Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy.

  3. #3
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,376
    Yeah, Jdusto's got it right.
    Top tube length is a product of seat angle, and the seat angle on the yelli is misleading for the reasons Jdusto went into.. plus, it's based on ( I think) a 100mm fork, so if you're running a 120 or a 140 the seat angle is off anyways

    So stack and reach are really what count, and your riding style...I'd be inclined to suggest the medium and find a seatpost that's long enough. (A 150mm kindshock might be longer than the reverb, and more durable in my experience too).

    FWIW I'm 2" shorter than you, long inseam, on a medium with a 50mm stem and 30" wide riser bars, slammed.

  4. #4
    Flow
    Reputation: Hermes475's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    85
    Thanks for your inputs. I was leaning toward the medium because I want a bike that is agile and can be relatively easily manualed. I cannot manual very well (i.e., not at all) on the big mama and I miss the ability to manual undulations in the trail. I will be running a Marz 44 chainlove special set at 140mm although I may lower it to 120mm if I feel the bb is too high and/or the ha is too slack. jdusto, what size is your YS?

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    251
    I have a L frame.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermes475 View Post
    Thanks for your inputs. I was leaning toward the medium because I want a bike that is agile and can be relatively easily manualed. I cannot manual very well (i.e., not at all) on the big mama and I miss the ability to manual undulations in the trail. I will be running a Marz 44 special set at 140mm although I may lower it to 120mm if I feel the bb is too high and/or the ha is too slack. jdusto, what size is your YS?
    The quiver: 2010 Santa Cruz Nomad, 2011 Specialized Demo II, 2011 Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42
    I'm in the same boat as you on sizing - I went with a medium YS ultimately and am glad that I did. I'm 5'10" with a 34" inseam, usually run my seat for pedaling (road, race, etc.) around 77.5 to 78 cm; the frame and the post I'm running (400 mm RF Turbine) will do that just barely. I usually run the seat around 74 mm for trail riding and that is more than fine, and as noted before, I agree that standing in rough stuff is sometimes better on this frame (lowering the seat is ideal - I wouldn't mind running a dropper post in the future). I'm running a 70 mm stem at a 120 mm fork - cockpit is quite good for me.
    1 Bike Shy of a Full Quiver

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wankel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattlock26 View Post
    I'm 5'10" with a 34" inseam, usually run my seat for pedaling (road, race, etc.) around 77.5 to 78 cm;
    Is that measurement top of saddle to BB?

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42
    Yes, I measure from the top of the saddle to the middle of the BB.
    1 Bike Shy of a Full Quiver

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    306
    I'm 6'2 on the money with long arms and long legs (35 inch inseam). You guys think a large would be to small?

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Quote Originally Posted by JonathanM View Post
    I'm 6'2 on the money with long arms and long legs (35 inch inseam). You guys think a large would be to small?
    The Large has only an 18" seattube which is kinda short. It all depends how far you like your seatpost. There are people around your height on M or L frames so it's all preference.
    konahonzo

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42

    I bought based on ETTL

    My seatpost is nearly maxed, but I'm very happy with the Medium; primarily because I have a long inseam at ~35 inches, but am on the short side for that dimension at 5'9". the reach on the medium with 70 mm stem has been perfect for me. Take care to consider the reach; it is long in proportion to the seat tube for this frame.

    One other consideration - don't know where you ride, but for me in New England where things are pretty tight, it's been great having the wheelbase of the smaller frame.
    1 Bike Shy of a Full Quiver

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    353
    @Mattlock26, you are 5'9" with a 35" inseam? Holy moly!

    I don't know which size to order myself. I am 5'9" with 29 1/4" inseam.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42
    Yeah, one reason why I went with the Yelli is so that I could get my bike handling skills up to complement my "freaky" dimensions in case I ever wanted to get into the circus!

    At 5'9" with ~30" inseam, I would say Medium all the way. My optimal (road, XC), BB to saddle height is around 77.8 cm; I ride more at 74 cm since this thing is used about 100% on technical trails. One thing that you could do if you're unclear on sizing is use the Competitve Cyclist or Wrench Science website fit calculators. Those are geared to dialing in road or XC race proportions, but give you a good idea of what frame dimensions and stem lengths to look at. For technical riding, I run the seat about 1.5" lower than optimal height, and I like to have a bit less stretched out cockpit as well (shorter stem and reach than road); I run a 70 mm stem and 28 inch wide bars.

    Hope that helps!
    1 Bike Shy of a Full Quiver

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    76
    I too am unsure if i should go with a M or L. I am 5'11", with a long torso and 31" inseam. I currently ride a M Salsa Big Mama, with a 70 mm stem.

    I am leaning toward a M, I'm more into DH/DJ, and technical riding. I am just concerned about the short seat tube.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42
    I would definitely go with optimal ETTL vs. seat tube - seat tube length is fairly irrelevant for this frame I think given riding intent and ability to get a good post (plus a bit more post gives some give to knock off chop, etc.). At 5"11" with a long torso, a medium may be tight. I think the ETTL for a 120 mm fork on the medium is around 600 give or take; figure with a 70 mm stem that's 670 mm. You might compare that to your Salsa to see how close it is.
    1 Bike Shy of a Full Quiver

  16. #16
    WNC Native
    Reputation: nitrousjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,279
    j.les- I'm also 5'11" with a 31" cycling inseam. I recently had a custom frame built and was actually shocked at the reach number we came to after fitting/testing.

    I just ordered a large. No way a med would work for me.
    "I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Asmodeus2112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    585
    6'3" with ~36" inseam. Thinking Large?

    Man, that Marz 44 Micro seems like a steal, how are ya'll liking it?

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoshM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by Asmodeus2112 View Post
    6'3" with ~36" inseam. Thinking Large?

    Man, that Marz 44 Micro seems like a steal, how are ya'll liking it?
    You've got pretty long legs.
    The 20" ST on the XL is going to be your friend.

    I ended up ordering an XL, and I will run a 50-70mm stem. I'm 6'4" with a 34" inseam.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    306
    I also ended going with XL due to the 20 inch ST. With a 70mm stem and 777mm wide bars, it should be spot on.

  20. #20
    The White Jeff W
    Reputation: jeffw-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,406
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshM View Post
    You've got pretty long legs.
    The 20" ST on the XL is going to be your friend.

    I ended up ordering an XL, and I will run a 50-70mm stem. I'm 6'4" with a 34" inseam.
    Id also recommend the XL. Im 6'3" on an XL. I was worried it would be too big but it's perfect with a 70mm stem. With the short chainstay the wheelbase is roughly the same as most mfg's large bikes
    No moss...

  21. #21
    Flow
    Reputation: Hermes475's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    85
    I finally got my medium YS built up. The size feels good (5'11", 33 inch inseam) but I have not gotten a proper ride in yet. With all the rain in the east these last few days, the trails are too wet. I am running an 80mm stem with ridiculously wide sunline flat bars. I may cut the bars down some if they prove to be too wide. Pics coming soon.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Asmodeus2112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    585
    Thanks for the replies, I'm super stoked about this frame!

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoshM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    526
    ^ What size and colour are you going to get?

    My vote is always for the Black Ano.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Asmodeus2112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshM View Post
    ^ What size and colour are you going to get?

    My vote is always for the Black Ano.
    Yeah, I like the black ano too, but I'm feeling crazy with this one... I just got the bug last night so I have yet to see what's available.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    19
    Is March the next batch of frames? Any changes or new colors anticipated?

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    798
    I talked to Sean last week about a frame for me and in our conversation I asked him if there was going to be anything new to look forward to this year with the YS. One new color is going to be blue, and all last years colors that weren't anodized, will be this year. I saw a picture of the anodized purple it was beautiful..
    *2018 Pivot Mach 5.5 Custom Build*
    *2017 Knolly Warden Custom Build*
    *2014 Knolly Endorphin Custom Build*

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    19
    So, the orange, green, and blue will be anodize finish? I'm looking forward to see what blue they choose, but the purple is gonna be tough to beat.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cSquared's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    285
    The blue is the lighter Ano blue.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: riiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by redhawk13 View Post
    Is March the next batch of frames? Any changes or new colors anticipated?
    All the gloss colors are gonna be anodized instead, is what I've heard.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    234
    What about a 6'-2" rider with a 33" inseam. I am thinking large because the ETT will match my large Pivot 429 at 24.5". I just don't want the seat jacked up over the handlebars. I want a 29er hardtail 1x9 to go with my 429.

  31. #31
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Blk02 View Post
    What about a 6'-2" rider with a 33" inseam. I am thinking large because the ETT will match my large Pivot 429 at 24.5". I just don't want the seat jacked up over the handlebars. I want a 29er hardtail 1x9 to go with my 429.
    I believe the head tube is the same length on the L and XL. That's what Lance Canfield told me. so your stem height will be the same L or XL.

    I'm 6'2" and I don't know my inseam. I do know that from center of bb to top of saddle along seat tube, I'm about 81cm with 180mm cranks. XL fits me good. Rode an L and it didn't fit me as good.

    L, with my seat height:
    (Bars and steerer tube were generic height, it was a demo bike.)


    large Yelli Screamy by fnagrom, on Flickr

    XL, with my seat height:


    My new Yelli Screamy and a giant sequoia stump by fnagrom, on Flickr

    XL feels right. More info on build here.

    Morgan

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    234
    I am about 73cm from center of bb to top of saddle on my current bike using 175mm cranks. Do you wear 35" or 36" inseam pants? What stem do you have on the bike? It looks like a 90mm or 100mm. Sounds like you have long arms and/or legs.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    234
    Anyone here riding a Large YS that is 6'-2" with a 33" inseam? How much seat post is exposed and is your seat still somewhat level with the handlebars? I am thinking I will have about 7.5" - 8" of exposed seat post with my inseam depending on crank length 170-175.

    I am thinking it would be better to buy a large and run a 100mm stem instead of an extra large with a 70mm stem. I am riding a Large Pivot 429 right now with a 90mm stem and 24.75 ETT. With the short chain-stay it might better to run a longer stem to keep more weight over the front end for better all around riding (most of our riding is cross country with minimal elevation change). Now if I lived in an area that had a lot of steep descents I could see going with a longer ETT and a shorter stem like the Kona Honzo design.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: riiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    488
    I'm 6'3", a 34" inseam (could be longer, dont know if I measured right), I have a longish torso and arms, but I ride a XL YS, 60mm stem, 0-offset stem and seat centered. I ran a 10mm spacer under the stem and my bars are 710mm wide and 15mm rise. I hope I was descriptive enough, hehe.
    Last edited by riiz; 08-01-2014 at 02:54 PM.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    798
    Quote Originally Posted by riiz View Post
    I'm 6'3", a 34" inseam (could be longer, dont know if I measured right), I have a longish torso and arms, but I ride a XL YS, 70mm stem, 0-offset stem and seat centered. I ran a 10mm spacer under the stem and my bars are 710mm wide and 15mm rise. I hope I was descriptive enough, hehe.



    What pedals are you using?
    *2018 Pivot Mach 5.5 Custom Build*
    *2017 Knolly Warden Custom Build*
    *2014 Knolly Endorphin Custom Build*

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation: riiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by kevinboyer View Post
    What pedals are you using?
    DMR V-12 mags in white.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    234
    Quote Originally Posted by riiz View Post
    I'm 6'3", a 34" inseam (could be longer, dont know if I measured right), I have a longish torso and arms, but I ride a XL YS, 70mm stem, 0-offset stem and seat centered. I ran a 10mm spacer under the stem and my bars are 710mm wide and 15mm rise. I hope I was descriptive enough, hehe.

    Very descriptive! Thank You! However, I was afraid a XL would require a short stem 60 to 70mm for a 6'-2" rider. I am trying to avoid the short stems since I had that issue on my XL 26" Trek EX8. I think a Large would work great with a 100mm or 110mm stem.

  38. #38
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Blk02 View Post
    I am about 73cm from center of bb to top of saddle on my current bike using 175mm cranks. Do you wear 35" or 36" inseam pants? What stem do you have on the bike? It looks like a 90mm or 100mm. Sounds like you have long arms and/or legs.
    I just went down to my garage and re-measured. It's 80.5cm from saddle top to bb center on the XL YS with 180mm cranks. It was probably 81cm on the L YS with 175mm cranks. See photos above. I'm measuring roughly along seat tube. No, my jeans say 32" inseam. My bike has a 60cm Truvativ stem, 31" bars. I have normal proportions.

    Morgan

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    410
    I thought I'd follow up after ordering a Yelli Screamy frame. I'm 6' with 34.5" cycling inseam. I went with large (anodized green), and I'm running a 90mm stem with straight seat post. I'm thinking about getting a setback post to give me a little more room. I'm glad I didn't go with a medium frame.
    Idaho

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SundayRiverRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    153
    I'm thinking of ordering a size large. I'm 6ft tall, 32.5 inseam. I've always ridden size L Specialized frames and never had any issues. Think the YS size L would work out OK?

  41. #41
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by SundayRiverRider View Post
    I'm thinking of ordering a size large. I'm 6ft tall, 32.5 inseam. I've always ridden size L Specialized frames and never had any issues. Think the YS size L would work out OK?
    Yep.

    Morgan

  42. #42
    BMF
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    593
    Quote Originally Posted by SundayRiverRider View Post
    I'm thinking of ordering a size large. I'm 6ft tall, 32.5 inseam. I've always ridden size L Specialized frames and never had any issues. Think the YS size L would work out OK?
    I agree with Morgan that you'll be ok on the L. When my LBS was ordering my Yelli they spoke to someone at Canfield and the recommendation that came back was a M. I wasn't part of the conversation - could be that the LBS guy ballparked my measurements way off. I've always ridden large in every frame I've owned and insisted on a L Yelli. I am 6'1" and wear a 32" pant leg and have a fairly long reach. I think if I didn't have a long reach the Medium may have been ok, but as is I have quite a bit of seat post exposed on the L and the bike feels perfect with a 70mm stem, about 1cm headset spacers, and low-rise bar. I don't have any problems sliding off the back of the saddle, and the bike feels totally balanced under me.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    15
    Anyone go from a Niner to a Yelli? I ride a Meduim Air9 and EMD. I'm 5'-11" with a 32 inseam and like the Fit of the Niners, but I want to try something different and the Yelli seams really fun. Just want to get the right size. I looked at the Reach and Top Tube Length Effective numbers and the Air9 falls right inbetween the Medium and Large Yelli. I want to run a 60mm stem on the Yelli with 685-711mm wide bars. Any advice will help. Thanks, Matt

  44. #44
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by SourWortBrewer View Post
    Anyone go from a Niner to a Yelli? I ride a Meduim Air9 and EMD. I'm 5'-11" with a 32 inseam and like the Fit of the Niners, but I want to try something different and the Yelli seams really fun. Just want to get the right size. I looked at the Reach and Top Tube Length Effective numbers and the Air9 falls right inbetween the Medium and Large Yelli. I want to run a 60mm stem on the Yelli with 685-711mm wide bars. Any advice will help. Thanks, Matt
    Guessing large. Yelli really rewards short stems. I rode a large AIR9 and it was on the small side for me, and the XL Yelli is perfect.

    Morgan

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: plume's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    I'm 5'10" longer legs, shorter torso I like 24.5" ish ETTs. My Niner was a medium (yuck), went with the large YS. The medium is really really small. I actually tried buying a used medium frame before I got my large - stand over to a fault perhaps, but there was no way I was ever going to get the saddle height correct on the medium, way too much seat post showing. I ride a 79cm saddle height and to be honest the large frame pushes this envelop as well. I rode it a few times with a traditional seat post and it looks ridiculous - I finally got my KS and it helped calm the appearance of the bike. After I got over that I realized how well the bike rode. I think the Yelli's sort of need an adj post really at least with my longish legs. If you're worried about top tube length, or reach as someone has said, slap a 50mm stem on there with some wider bars... I'll only run longer stems now for endurance racing.

    I like how Niner has realized the value of these playful 29ers and is finally getting close with a bike that doesn't steer like a ship - with an EBB and a steel chassis they're still off the mark though!
    My one says BRAP!

  46. #46
    two wheel whore
    Reputation: Shmoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    524
    Plume, wicked how close we are in height, yet far in preference. I'm 5'7", my Niner is a small with 23" ETT, my Salsa is a small with 22.8" ETT, and I have a medium YS coming after talking to Canfield. My old BMC was 24" ETT and I hated it. Even with a 45mm stem. The long TT made me run a 685mm bar, which I hated.
    We'll see how the YS turns out. The reach isn't much different from my WFO.

  47. #47
    Back of the pack fat guy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,958
    I'm very, very tempted by the Yelli, but am really concerned about fit, especially the 18" seat tube length. I'm a hair over 6', pants inseam is a 34". I usually run my saddle about 787-791mm from the middle of the BB to the top of the saddle. On my One 9, which has a 19.5" seat tube, my 400mm post is nearly maxed out on height. I just don't see how I'd be able to get enough height on the saddle on an 18" seat tube. Otherwise, all the other angles and measurements on the L are spot on. (I can't seem to find a "stack" measurement, though.)

  48. #48
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    I'd say "L", for you.

    All Yelli Screamy's have the same head tube, don't know what the stack height is, but its consistent across all sizes; 110mm or 4.33". Yelli Screamy - the 29er that handles like a 26" mountain bike frame

    Morgan

  49. #49
    Back of the pack fat guy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by morganfletcher View Post
    I'd say "L", for you.
    Doesn't 18" seem a little too short of a seat tube for a size L frame? The new Niner ROS has a short seat tube on the L as well. Is this a function of the longer fork on a hardtail affecting the geometry?

  50. #50
    Back of the pack fat guy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,958
    Sorry, I meant "stack" not as in stack height of the head tube, but the vertical stack measurement from the BB to where it intersects with thehorizontal "reach" line. I'm finding that knowing the stack and reach is a better indication of overall bike fit than ETT or ST numbers. Canfield's website gives the reach number, but not the stack.

  51. #51
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Earthpig View Post
    Doesn't 18" seem a little too short of a seat tube for a size L frame?
    Compared to other frames, yes. But it fits with the Yelli design esthetic; low-slung. That's one of the hallmarks of this frame. I tried an L, but at 6'2" I needed the XL. The reach could have worked (with a longer stem, which is not right for this bike), but the seat tube never would have worked. See post #31.

    Morgan

  52. #52
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Earthpig View Post
    Sorry, I meant "stack" not as in stack height of the head tube, but the vertical stack measurement from the BB to where it intersects with thehorizontal "reach" line. I'm finding that knowing the stack and reach is a better indication of overall bike fit than ETT or ST numbers. Canfield's website gives the reach number, but not the stack.
    Ah, I'm not familiar with that way of sizing. Since the head tube remains constant length across sizes, I'd think your definition of stack would, too. I ride an XL with a 140mm fork, and my seat likes to be 81.5cm from saddle top to bb center, measured along the (virtual) seat tube. FWIW

    Morgan

  53. #53
    Back of the pack fat guy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,958
    Yeah, I'm sorta leggy for my height (FWIW, whenever I hop on anybody else's bike who is roughly my height, the saddle feels too low), so I'm afraid the L Yelli would be too small and the XL would be too big. However, the L Nimble 9 looks almost perfect from a geometry standpoint. Looks like I will be Nimble instead of Yelli.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Earthpig View Post
    Yeah, I'm sorta leggy for my height (FWIW, whenever I hop on anybody else's bike who is roughly my height, the saddle feels too low), so I'm afraid the L Yelli would be too small and the XL would be too big. However, the L Nimble 9 looks almost perfect from a geometry standpoint. Looks like I will be Nimble instead of Yelli.


    Please let me know how the frame fits. I've got very similar measurements (6'0 and 34.5 inseam) and really desire a yelli for the weight savings, but don't like the seatpost height w/ the frame (especially on the L compared to the XL).

    I'm also on an on-one scandal 19.5 and have some difficulties with cockpit comfort vs. handling (recently went setback post with 90mm stem and I've tried no setback with 120mm stem, etc, etc.). Its close to getting dialed regarding handling, but still get some neck and shoulder pain. I think 100mm stem is probably best for comfort, but really miss the handling of the 90mm when I change it.....

    Anyway, both canfield frames look awesome. My xc riding buddy has a carbon chinese hongfu fm-056 and the 69.5 slack headtube along with the low bb make a big difference on descents compared to the On-One with 72 and high bb.

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    Well. Same problem here. 6'2'' around 33'' inseam and dilemma about L or XL size. My local shop only has L size for a great price. Getting XL would mean 250 Euro more. So it's L with KS dropper post or XL with no dropper post for me.

    I have Cube Stereo 29er now L size (which is 20'') and it's OK. Not sure if perfect as this is my first 29er and all for me feel big after 26'' (which were too small for sure). I run 70mm stem on my Cube and it's OK. I even consider shorter one. I hate long stems and I want to avoid one on Yelli.

    Any advice? L with dropper or XL without?

  56. #56
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by mikelo303 View Post
    Well. Same problem here. 6'2'' around 33'' inseam and dilemma about L or XL size. My local shop only has L size for a great price. Getting XL would mean 250 Euro more. So it's L with KS dropper post or XL with no dropper post for me.

    I have Cube Stereo 29er now L size (which is 20'') and it's OK. Not sure if perfect as this is my first 29er and all for me feel big after 26'' (which were too small for sure). I run 70mm stem on my Cube and it's OK. I even consider shorter one. I hate long stems and I want to avoid one on Yelli.

    Any advice? L with dropper or XL without?
    XL without.

    Morgan

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by morganfletcher View Post
    XL without.

    Morgan
    Damn! I was afraid you will say that.

    Thanks...

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    I double checked. I am actually (187 cm not 189) = 6'1'' (2cm difference) and my inseam is almost 34'' (86 cm, hard to measure really). So I am slightly smaller guy than expected with slightly longer legs. I assume XL frame? Correct?

    PS> Morgan you are the best. I read all your entries. I wish I could test it myself before paying $$$$. In Europe (Ireland) this frame costs 1300$!!! you know (shipping 200$+Tax+Duty). I cannot make mistake here.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    And finally. Planning to get 120mm or 140mm fork. 740mm handlebar. 70mm stem. (current bike setup) If that helps.

  60. #60
    bicycle rider
    Reputation: morganfletcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by mikelo303 View Post
    I double checked. I am actually (187 cm not 189) = 6'1'' (2cm difference) and my inseam is almost 34'' (86 cm, hard to measure really). So I am slightly smaller guy than expected with slightly longer legs. I assume XL frame? Correct?

    PS> Morgan you are the best. I read all your entries. I wish I could test it myself before paying $$$$. In Europe (Ireland) this frame costs 1300$!!! you know (shipping 200$+Tax+Duty). I cannot make mistake here.
    This is a tough one. I understand where you're at! I'm 6'2". Not sure of my inseam, but my saddle height with 175mm cranks is about 81.5cm, using TIME ATAC pedals and SIDI Dominator shoes. I'd offer you my bike to try! Maybe a cheap round-trip flight to SFO is in order.

    My son is 5'11", and with his saddle at his preferred pedaling height of 79cm bb center to saddle top, he is already past the MAX line of his Race Face 375mm seatpost, with WTB Volt saddle, on his L Yelli Screamy, also with TIME ATAC pedals. I think we can get him a taller seatpost. He says he's on the tall side for his large. (He's 16.)

    If you have a current bike that has the saddle at the right spot, check your saddle top to bb center distance, and compare with ours.

    Another thought; I just got a set of Spank Spike platform pedals and some Five Ten shoes, and I'm going to try riding that way for a while. I'm pretty sure I'll have to drop my saddle height due to the lower pedal platform, and moving my foot toward the arch over the pedal spindle. I talked to two of my friends who've switched to flats and they both told me their saddle dropped 15-20mm. (These guys are both about 6'.) So, if you are currently riding "clipless" pedals (SPD, ATAC, Eggbeater) and you want to make the L fit, *and* you want to get rad on the bike, maybe try some of the new, thin, platform pedals.

    And seriously, if you come to CA, you can ride mine.

    Morgan

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by morganfletcher View Post
    This is a tough one. I understand where you're at! I'm 6'2". Not sure of my inseam, but my saddle height with 175mm cranks is about 81.5cm, using TIME ATAC pedals and SIDI Dominator shoes. I'd offer you my bike to try! Maybe a cheap round-trip flight to SFO is in order.

    My son is 5'11", and with his saddle at his preferred pedaling height of 79cm bb center to saddle top, he is already past the MAX line of his Race Face 375mm seatpost, with WTB Volt saddle, on his L Yelli Screamy, also with TIME ATAC pedals. I think we can get him a taller seatpost. He says he's on the tall side for his large. (He's 16.)

    If you have a current bike that has the saddle at the right spot, check your saddle top to bb center distance, and compare with ours.

    Another thought; I just got a set of Spank Spike platform pedals and some Five Ten shoes, and I'm going to try riding that way for a while. I'm pretty sure I'll have to drop my saddle height due to the lower pedal platform, and moving my foot toward the arch over the pedal spindle. I talked to two of my friends who've switched to flats and they both told me their saddle dropped 15-20mm. (These guys are both about 6'.) So, if you are currently riding "clipless" pedals (SPD, ATAC, Eggbeater) and you want to make the L fit, *and* you want to get rad on the bike, maybe try some of the new, thin, platform pedals.

    And seriously, if you come to CA, you can ride mine.

    Morgan

    Morgan you are a star. I will do BB - seat distance test on my current bike and compare it to yours. Plus I will take my current seat post and measure it on yelli L frame. If it's decent enough I will go with L. If it's too stretched I will order XL. I use flats so that helps as well.

    Thanks again for your help. You should get some love form Canfield Bros for your help

    Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: plume's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    XL, especially if you're running a short stem. I'm 5'11" and am on a L
    My one says BRAP!

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: savo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    780
    mikelo - I'm 187cm and my saddle height is 80cm (don't remember inseam measure).
    I ride an XL Yelli.
    At first (three years ago) I built it with 120mm fork, offset seatpost and 80mm stem,
    then changed to 140mm fork, straight seatpost and 65mm stem,
    and finally 150mm fork, straight seatpost and 50mm stem.
    I still love it.
    Next upgrade may be 45mm wide rims and a 29+ front tire.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    380
    I am the same as you, almost exactly - i have a large with 60mm stem and WIDE bars with a dropper and stans flow EX wide rims, the bike is a bit small but playful - pretty much what i want. Not set up for 30 mile rides though, but perfect for 10-15 miles rides. IF you want to do longer rides you might need a longer stem 80-90mm, but with my setup i can manual easily so its fun to ride.

    Quote Originally Posted by JonathanM View Post
    I'm 6'2 on the money with long arms and long legs (35 inch inseam). You guys think a large would be to small?

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Banjopickin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    402
    5'9" here with long arms. I ride a L Nomad now with 60mm stem and it shreds. I'm super comfortable on it size wise but its not fun on big climbing days with a 160mm fork. I want to build a hardtail for long days/races here in western NC. The yelli is perfect for this with a 120mm fork but I'm torn on size. I have a long reach for my height and prefer a large frame but switching to 29er I'm worried about a L being too big. Any help folks?

    Thanks.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    808
    I'm 5'11 and ride a medium yelli
    Using a fox doss dropper and I'm pretty comfortable on it.
    2014 Santa Cruz Tallboy LTc
    Trek Farley 8
    iDream Images

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by surftime View Post
    I am the same as you, almost exactly - i have a large with 60mm stem and WIDE bars with a dropper and stans flow EX wide rims, the bike is a bit small but playful - pretty much what i want. Not set up for 30 mile rides though, but perfect for 10-15 miles rides. IF you want to do longer rides you might need a longer stem 80-90mm, but with my setup i can manual easily so its fun to ride.
    Same here, I'm 6'2" & 34" inseam ... just wondering how your getting along with the Large still? What length forks are you running?
    Looking to get a Yelli as I want something a bit more fun when I want fun and that can still do 20, 30 mile + XC rides most weekends.

  68. #68
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,505
    6'2, 34 inseam. I've had two L Yellis. To be honest, if I were to buy another if would be XL. You can make the L work from a length perspective, mine was perfect with a 70mm stem. As others have said, it's the seat tube length that gets you.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4

    SM or MED?

    Hey all, I'm trying to size myself up for a YS frame as well. I'm on the other side of the spectrum as compared to the rest of this thread (5'8", ~29" inseam) and am torn between a small and medium. My 9:zero:7 fat bike is a small, and I love the positioning/size for stand up climbing and getting over the front of the bike, but my medium trance x 29er feels good in its own way for longer rides too (and seated climbs). the ETT length between the small YS and 907 are only 0.1" apart (23", 22.9"), but I'm afraid I'm not taking a different geo factor into consideration and might feel cramped if I get a small/stretched out on a medium. The medium trance ETT is 23.4", YS: 23.75" The fact that the seat tube angle is deceiving (making your seat further back than expected) is making me think small, any takes on this? Thanks
    Last edited by cjshaw636; 05-19-2014 at 12:18 PM.

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4
    Went with a medium after getting sized up correctly at a lbs for 10 bucks.. Got one of the last two med PC sparkle blue (limited) frames! If you're a medium and haven't seen them yet I suggest snatching up the last one! Pics to follow when build is done

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    396
    Quote Originally Posted by cjshaw636 View Post
    Went with a medium after getting sized up correctly at a lbs for 10 bucks.. Got one of the last two med PC sparkle blue (limited) frames! If you're a medium and haven't seen them yet I suggest snatching up the last one! Pics to follow when build is done
    I am similar height and inseam. I ride a medium frame with a 50mm stem and the cockpit is spot on, so you should be fine. Yeah, the sparkle blues were out when I ordered mine a several months ago. Went with black chrome instead and totally dig it!

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4

    PC sparkle blue medium yelli

    yelli screamy sizing?-image.jpgyelli screamy sizing?-image.jpgWell here it is as promised!
    -fox float 120mm
    -Thompson dropper seatpost
    -stans flow ex rims
    -hope pro II evo hubs
    -xt deore 180mm brakes
    -zee rear deraileur
    -x9 crankset
    -Hope T-Rex 40t cassette extender (recommended on this bike)
    -CF fizik gobi seat
    -Maxxis ardent R/ High roller II F
    -755mm. renthal farbar and Kevlar grips
    27 lbs but beefy and a blast!

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    35
    Beautiful build! Congratulations!

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    415
    Finally got to pedal one around for a few minutes. My friend just got one. I am 5-11 and ride a large Tallboy. The Yelli was a large, and it felt very short compared to my tallboy even through the numbers say it is longer:
    Tallboy reach: 16.4.
    Yelli reach: 17
    This was odd and suprising. And the stem on the Yelli was longer than the one on my Tallboy. I don't understand it but it must be a function of the seat tube angle somehow. Besides the shortness of reach, it felt like a big BMX bike after riding the Tallboy. Short rear is so awesome! I want one more now than I did before.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4
    Well the Yelli is going up for sale, it will have a Giant contact dropper post, and Giant P-trx1 wheel set (off of Giant Trance 29'er 0, msrp $5000) instead of the stans and Thompson. I switched the wheels because the maxxis were too wide and bulky for the terrain I was using the Yelli on, but they are the best thing ever on my Trance x 29er. Bike has literally under 100 miles on it otherwise. Message if interested

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    290
    Hey guys, very interested in trying my first hard tail since college 10 years ago. Been riding full squish bikes the past two years and want a bike to compliment my Nomad. Yelli seems to be a great climber with the ability to rip the decent. Anyways, I'm 6'4 and mostly legs, not sure the inseam but I'd wager to say 35". Anybody my height on the XL want to provide feedback on the fit? What size stem you running?

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    138
    I'm looking at these frames I'm also feeling a bit between sizes; I'm 6'1.5" and my current XC 29er has a ETT of around 630 with and 100mm stem, and it fits pretty spot on I think. But the Canfield hardtails seems like they're begging for a longer fork and shorter stem, and a 640-650 ETT seems like it might be too stretched out. I do prefer my mountain bikes to be slightly on the small side though.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: beer_coffee_water's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    732
    Quote Originally Posted by biggrumble View Post
    I'm looking at these frames I'm also feeling a bit between sizes; I'm 6'1.5" and my current XC 29er has a ETT of around 630 with and 100mm stem, and it fits pretty spot on I think. But the Canfield hardtails seems like they're begging for a longer fork and shorter stem, and a 640-650 ETT seems like it might be too stretched out. I do prefer my mountain bikes to be slightly on the small side though.
    Why would you be stretched out if you ran the aforementioned wide bar short stem combo?

Similar Threads

  1. Yelli Screamy as SS
    By alexkraemer in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 01:49 AM
  2. Yelli Screamy
    By synnie in forum Canfield
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-25-2011, 08:04 PM
  3. My Yelli Screamy review
    By OneBadWagon in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 09-19-2011, 07:31 AM
  4. Does anybody with a Yelli Screamy also have a Nomad?
    By naya the dingo in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2011, 10:29 AM
  5. SPAM: Yelli Screamy
    By capslayer in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-10-2011, 11:22 AM

Members who have read this thread: 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •