Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 54
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    140

    Marines in Sycamore Canyon last Sat July 12.

    The marines had a group of ATVs located about 100 yards past the signs in the dry creekbed to the west of the big power tower and they were turning back bikers. A rider in the lot near the high school also told me he had been given a $200 citation in the Spring-Oak canyon area for being on the base about 2 weeks ago. He didn't know exactly where he was, but it wasn't on the ridge. FYI

  2. #2
    Master of the Face Plant
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,902
    You can expect more closures and more enforcement in other areas as well. Based on recently released USFWS documents you will soon see more trails closed at Sweetwater, Otay etc. The plans they show for Del Mar Mesa bear almost no resemblance to trail plans we have seen proposed by SDMBA. Basically, San Diego is getting screwed. What trails remain will be dumbed down and overused. Trail user conflict will rise because we are all getting squeezed in. Hikers, Equestrians and trail runners are getting screwed too.
    http://www.nbbikes.com/
    ^^^Best Bike Shop of MTBR 2008^^^

  3. #3
    most memberable
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    691
    Quote Originally Posted by sandmangts View Post
    You can expect more closures and more enforcement in other areas as well. Based on recently released USFWS documents you will soon see more trails closed at Sweetwater, Otay etc. The plans they show for Del Mar Mesa bear almost no resemblance to trail plans we have seen proposed by SDMBA. Basically, San Diego is getting screwed. What trails remain will be dumbed down and overused. Trail user conflict will rise because we are all getting squeezed in. Hikers, Equestrians and trail runners are getting screwed too.
    ^^^^ This is why I bike away from local trails...like up in Cuyamaca, Mt Laguna, Lake Morena, OC, LA mtns, Northern Cali, etc.
    These areas are not very crowded, as a lot of people are just too damned lazy to drive more than an hour or two in either direction to ride...or ride trails that are long uphill and steep...too much work!

    As I have stated before, I also hike the same trails I bike...local hiking trails are too crowded...so I hike up in the mountains...very little people or no people for hours on end!

    The writing is on the wall....I saw it many years ago.

    Perhaps a silver lining: as a result of the closure of local trails, more trails might open in the mountains! Like the PCT!!!

    Who is with me???

  4. #4
    Master of the Face Plant
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by RTSO2112 View Post
    ^^^^ This is why I bike away from local trails...like up in Cuyamaca, Mt Laguna, Lake Morena, OC, LA mtns, Northern Cali, etc.
    These areas are not very crowded, as a lot of people are just too damned lazy to drive more than an hour or two in either direction to ride...or ride trails that are long uphill and steep...too much work!

    As I have stated before, I also hike the same trails I bike...local hiking trails are too crowded...so I hike up in the mountains...very little people or no people for hours on end!

    The writing is on the wall....I saw it many years ago.

    Perhaps a silver lining: as a result of the closure of local trails, more trails might open in the mountains! Like the PCT!!!

    Who is with me???
    The PCT will never be legal for bikes. There will be other trails opening up in rural communities that need the additional revenue and that's great but having to burn $50 bucks worth of gas every time I want to have a good ride or hike sucks. For those of us who have small kids and demanding jobs it is also nice to be able to squeeze in an hour or two of riding after work or early on the weekends and still have time to spend with the kids.

    I agree, the writing has been on the wall since trails started getting bulldozed over a decade ago. Every time it happens we have the same dedicated handful of people who try to do something about it only to be told by officials like Zirkle and MTRP board members and USFWS to sit down and shut up. We are told how selfish we are and how there are so many miles of trails for us to ride while developers bulldoze mile after mile of trail and habitat. Such bullsh!t.

    Consider this, as trails start to dwindle more hikers, bikers and equestrians will be heading to the mountains. Trails that were once tranquil and lightly used will become more crowded. User conflict will rise. More lands will be proposed for Wilderness designation and other protections which will ban bikes permanently.
    http://www.nbbikes.com/
    ^^^Best Bike Shop of MTBR 2008^^^

  5. #5
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    the more that is closed, the more new trails there are/will be. No officials want to address this, it's simply a "not my problem" approach, the "environmental destruction" is much greater with the more and more trails being built.

    I'd say the riders have tried fairly hard to present and help with solutions. City and County government doesn't want to address things.

    It will take a few more years but I imagine someone, at some point will get it.

    This being said, I've seen various packs of riders from 6-20+ riding where they know they should not be. Not just riding but hanging out on ridge lines socializing. Not a good idea.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    645
    Kind of silly to say that people who can't drive 2-4 hours every time they want to go on a ride are "too damned lazy"

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd View Post
    the more that is closed, the more new trails there are/will be. No officials want to address this, it's simply a "not my problem" approach, the "environmental destruction" is much greater with the more and more trails being built.

    ....
    Agree.

    Every time they close popular trails, more illegal trails get built. Then priorities shift and they stop enforcing the old trails, so people ride them again. When a rule doesn't make sense people don't listen to it. The fear of being ticketed only goes so far since they can't be there all the time.

    If they don't get (and listen) to rider input and provide good trails this will always be a problem.

  8. #8
    Master of the Face Plant
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Mama View Post
    Kind of silly to say that people who can't drive 2-4 hours every time they want to go on a ride are "too damned lazy"
    More like "too damned busy" or "too damned broke"
    http://www.nbbikes.com/
    ^^^Best Bike Shop of MTBR 2008^^^

  9. #9
    Master of the Face Plant
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Mama View Post
    Agree.

    Every time they close popular trails, more illegal trails get built. Then priorities shift and they stop enforcing the old trails, so people ride them again. When a rule doesn't make sense people don't listen to it. The fear of being ticketed only goes so far since they can't be there all the time.


    If they don't get (and listen) to rider input and provide good trails this will always be a problem.
    I agree as well but I hope that the city would realize that the establishment of legal trail options only bolsters the desire to preserve these areas. Look at La Costa for example. It is a good challenging trail system and has been well maintained by bikers for quite a long time. My fear is that San Diego will become more like Marin where rangers lie in wait with radar guns to ticket bikers on legal trails.
    http://www.nbbikes.com/
    ^^^Best Bike Shop of MTBR 2008^^^

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    405
    It seems like the current approach (trying to actually speak with representatives, voice concerns, propose multi-use options, etc . . . ). How crazy would it be to try and make the positions that edict park plans elected rather than appointed? I realize that it's a double edged sword since electees would then cater to developers even more (is that even possible) but, at least there'd be the ability to opt for not rehiring.

  11. #11
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Mission Trails is going so overboard that they're closing trails which are actually park trails.

    I noticed 2 nights ago, the small 30-50 yard trail to the grinding rocks in the Grasslands was covered in 2 feet of brush. There used to be a sign pointing people to the rocks, that's gone too. I've emailed but no response yet.

    Honestly a lot of this is fallout from people who shouldn't be or should have never been in the leadership positions they are. The good old boy network works very well for them though, so onward we go.

  12. #12
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    Take candy bars, lots of candy bars. Marines like candy bars! You might need to unwrap for them, as their hands are glued on to an M16, just ready for the enemy (that's you and me fellow mtn bikers) to make a bad move.

    Marine base is WAY overdue to close down and move the war games elsewhere. Our readiness is no longer an issue. Our country is OVER THE TOP ready to blow this earth up 100's of times. Enough with the BS.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    645
    yup

    also kind of funny that the proposed solution for san diego's trail issues is to ride trails that aren't in san diego..

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    645
    Mountainbikers - the new INSURGENTS!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXmNuc_h90g

  15. #15
    Master of the Face Plant
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by CEB View Post
    Take candy bars, lots of candy bars. Marines like candy bars! You might need to unwrap for them, as their hands are glued on to an M16, just ready for the enemy (that's you and me fellow mtn bikers) to make a bad move.

    Marine base is WAY overdue to close down and move the war games elsewhere. Our readiness is no longer an issue. Our country is OVER THE TOP ready to blow this earth up 100's of times. Enough with the BS.
    Oh I don't know. I kinda like having them around. Especially when fire season comes around.

    Marines in Sycamore Canyon last Sat July 12.-10313324_596861870421843_501316473749121070_n.jpg
    http://www.nbbikes.com/
    ^^^Best Bike Shop of MTBR 2008^^^

  16. #16
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    "Oh I don't know. I kinda like having them around. Especially when fire season comes around."

    Park that sheet at Pendleton, close enough when needed for fire eradication.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: h82crash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    177
    So sad. Sycamore is one of my favorites. Here's an idea. The military is always looking for ways to connect with the community. Since that is the most remote, useless edge of the base, maybe the Marines can set it aside as a mountain bike park open to the public. Ooh, and a parking lot right behind those houses on Medina.
    Goat Rider

  18. #18
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Mama View Post
    Mountainbikers - the new INSURGENTS!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXmNuc_h90g
    I've been saying this here on emptybeer for the last couple years...San Diego has always been the point of the spear for privileged interests getting their way and leaving the public to deal with the after effects and pay the bill as well. It's always been this way.

    Zirkle is just the latest of the minions for the developers. Facts and studies don't matter to petty clerck-bureaucrats like him when their main job is to mollify developers and enable them to gobble up huge amounts of open space, cover it with McMansions and town homes, and move on after making a killing.

    That kind of job is called Public Service in San Diego, the Regressive capital of the Southwest.

    Richard Nixon didn't call this his "Lucky City" for nothing. This town LOVES a crook with a pocket full of bribe money.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,398
    I sat down with the rangers at Elfin Forest recently and realized how much of a mess things are. The problem does not lie with any specific leadership group. The real problem is that the government as a whole does not grasp the concept of buying and maintaining lands for recreational use, they buy and maintain for preservation. Preservation is defined very, very narrowly with no easy ways to approve new trails etc.

    You also have multiple government entities involved with very different rules/goals in very small areas. Elfin Forest proper is paid for and maintained by Olivenhain Water District (of which I am resident) even though their main users come from San Marco and Escondido. The area at the bottom is controlled by The Escondido Creek Conservancy which uses funds from donations and grants from the State of California. Those grants are specifically for preservation and not recreation. The East side from Del Dios is controlled by San Diego County and the funds for that purchase also came from the same California State grants for preservation.

    Now, Elfin Forest wants to create a second entrance into the park to take some load off of the Way Up Trail. They would like this to be at the base of the dam, but there are access issues on the road which is technically owned by three different entities including the residents of Cielo. TECC would like to create more access on their lands as well, but they are not allowed to based on the grant money from the State. The state does audit trail creation every ten years and if too many are created it goes outside the bounds of the grant and they shut things down (EXACTLY what happened at MTRP) since the land is "not being preserved" in its natural state. This is outside the control of local rangers or even local government. Looking Del Dios Highlands (park off of Del Dios Highway) they also want to cut singletrack up to Elfin Forest, but are handcuffed by the State since the land is for conservation and preservation, NOT recreation.

    All of this comes from an entity that is actively engaging the mountain bike community and openly admits we are the most responsible and involved user group.

    So what does it all mean? If we want true change some organization needs to actively engage the Federal and State government and attempt to change perception around why the public wants lands set aside. It is NOT for preservation, it is for active recreation in most situations. The population base has radically changed in the last 30 years from sedentary to active especially in San Diego. The government has not caught up to this yet since it moves at a much slower pace.

    The other piece of this is that these entities are not specifically anti biker. They are trying to enforce the rules to maintain their grant money and maintenance budgets. Right now we are in the 10th year of the cycle where the State is verifying/auditing that the lands are being properly managed for preservation. The MTRP closures are a direct result of this, not the park rangers or even the County. If they did not close the trails their budgets would be eliminated since the money really comes from the State grants.

    All of this being said, I am just as frustrated as the rest of you and prior to my meeting with OMWD and TECC I also placed blame on the rangers, City and County organizations. Unfortunately it goes well beyond them and it is going to take years of work to change the views across the government organization.

    Upside is that once the audits and completed, enforcement will slowly dwindle and things will be back to relative normal 18 months from now. Not an ideal situation, but not the end of the world either.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,398
    Quote Originally Posted by CEB View Post
    Marine base is WAY overdue to close down and move the war games elsewhere. Our readiness is no longer an issue. Our country is OVER THE TOP ready to blow this earth up 100's of times. Enough with the BS.
    Do you ever hear the helicopters and jets fly over? Do you know what that sounds is? It is freedom right over your head. This is NIMBY'ism at its worst.

    I am not some crazy right wing guy, but if you can't see the risks to the US right now you would have to be blind. Major escalations with an expansionist minded leader in Russia. A Chinese government that is going to have a major showdown with it's own population in the next 10-15 years. Middle Eastern extremist that would like to put the world back into the stone age. Etc, etc, etc. The reason our country and way of lives continue is because of our ability to project power and keep trouble far, far away from our borders.

    Overall I do not think we should be the World Police. Iraq was a joke and the void created by removing Saddam has created a void that is being filled by far more dangerous people, which is exactly the reason we kept him in power for so long. Afghanistan we went into with good intentions, but again as soon as we pull out a vacuum is created and things go right back to the way they were.

    Saying that we should start closing down more military bases does not sit well with me right now. There is far too much risk to us right now from both major nation/state entities and NGO's/terrorist organizations. When you see entire countries being taken over by radicals (Syria anyone?) the last thing you want to do is downsize your military. Nuclear bombs are not going to solve the modern day military problems we have which is what you reference with your comment of blowing the world up 100's of times over.

    /rant

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    I sat down with the rangers at Elfin Forest recently and realized how much of a mess things are. The problem does not lie with any specific leadership group. The real problem is that the government as a whole does not grasp the concept of buying and maintaining lands for recreational use, they buy and maintain for preservation. Preservation is defined very, very narrowly with no easy ways to approve new trails etc.

    You also have multiple government entities involved with very different rules/goals in very small areas. Elfin Forest proper is paid for and maintained by Olivenhain Water District (of which I am resident) even though their main users come from San Marco and Escondido. The area at the bottom is controlled by The Escondido Creek Conservancy which uses funds from donations and grants from the State of California. Those grants are specifically for preservation and not recreation. The East side from Del Dios is controlled by San Diego County and the funds for that purchase also came from the same California State grants for preservation.

    Now, Elfin Forest wants to create a second entrance into the park to take some load off of the Way Up Trail. They would like this to be at the base of the dam, but there are access issues on the road which is technically owned by three different entities including the residents of Cielo. TECC would like to create more access on their lands as well, but they are not allowed to based on the grant money from the State. The state does audit trail creation every ten years and if too many are created it goes outside the bounds of the grant and they shut things down (EXACTLY what happened at MTRP) since the land is "not being preserved" in its natural state. This is outside the control of local rangers or even local government. Looking Del Dios Highlands (park off of Del Dios Highway) they also want to cut singletrack up to Elfin Forest, but are handcuffed by the State since the land is for conservation and preservation, NOT recreation.

    All of this comes from an entity that is actively engaging the mountain bike community and openly admits we are the most responsible and involved user group.

    So what does it all mean? If we want true change some organization needs to actively engage the Federal and State government and attempt to change perception around why the public wants lands set aside. It is NOT for preservation, it is for active recreation in most situations. The population base has radically changed in the last 30 years from sedentary to active especially in San Diego. The government has not caught up to this yet since it moves at a much slower pace.

    The other piece of this is that these entities are not specifically anti biker. They are trying to enforce the rules to maintain their grant money and maintenance budgets. Right now we are in the 10th year of the cycle where the State is verifying/auditing that the lands are being properly managed for preservation. The MTRP closures are a direct result of this, not the park rangers or even the County. If they did not close the trails their budgets would be eliminated since the money really comes from the State grants.

    All of this being said, I am just as frustrated as the rest of you and prior to my meeting with OMWD and TECC I also placed blame on the rangers, City and County organizations. Unfortunately it goes well beyond them and it is going to take years of work to change the views across the government organization.

    Upside is that once the audits and completed, enforcement will slowly dwindle and things will be back to relative normal 18 months from now. Not an ideal situation, but not the end of the world either.
    Sounds like another option would be to stop funding state grants, and use local funds to acquire/maintain land for recreational purposes. (This coming from someone who's pretty darn liberal.) Downside here is that all the mountain bikers and other beneficiaries of trails would need to pony up the dough for trails/land. I don't see it happening. It's easier to kowtow to the state and get "free money" and then kick user groups off the land. And guess what, you can get additional money when you fine users for non-compliance.

    The real problem is that the "representatives" establishing regulations for land use (i.e. state/federal), and for agreeing to adhere to regulations in order to acquire land (local) and too short-sighted or lack concern for their more numerous, but less financially endowed constituents.

    In other words, we ain't getting represented, and I don't think there's much we can do 'bout it.

  22. #22
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    Do you ever hear the helicopters and jets fly over? Do you know what that sounds is? It is freedom right over your head. This is NIMBY'ism at its worst.

    I am not some crazy right wing guy, but if you can't see the risks to the US right now you would have to be blind. Major escalations with an expansionist minded leader in Russia. A Chinese government that is going to have a major showdown with it's own population in the next 10-15 years. Middle Eastern extremist that would like to put the world back into the stone age. Etc, etc, etc. The reason our country and way of lives continue is because of our ability to project power and keep trouble far, far away from our borders.

    Overall I do not think we should be the World Police. Iraq was a joke and the void created by removing Saddam has created a void that is being filled by far more dangerous people, which is exactly the reason we kept him in power for so long. Afghanistan we went into with good intentions, but again as soon as we pull out a vacuum is created and things go right back to the way they were.

    Saying that we should start closing down more military bases does not sit well with me right now. There is far too much risk to us right now from both major nation/state entities and NGO's/terrorist organizations. When you see entire countries being taken over by radicals (Syria anyone?) the last thing you want to do is downsize your military. Nuclear bombs are not going to solve the modern day military problems we have which is what you reference with your comment of blowing the world up 100's of times over.

    /rant
    In a nutshell: You've bought the fear, the whole package and can't back down. I understand, you are not the only one. It's cool.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    140
    I'll back you if you run for office Salespunk !

  24. #24
    most memberable
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    691
    Quote Originally Posted by CEB View Post
    In a nutshell: You've bought the fear, the whole package and can't back down. I understand, you are not the only one. It's cool.
    You beat me to it!

    Btw, I was in the Military for 20 years and have worked 10 more with them as a civilian as well...so, I have seen (first-hand) how this game is played and works.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Julie View Post
    I'll back you if you run for office Salespunk !
    LOL awesome! I will let you know if I ever run!

  26. #26
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Salespunk View Post
    LOL awesome! I will let you know if I ever run!
    Google "Smedley Butler". That is all, for now.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    2
    Probably just part of agenda 21.

  28. #28
    Certifiably Crazy
    Reputation: Carloswithac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    441
    Quick question, is there a way to ride to the Sycamore Test Facility? I keep on seeing it on the map. Or is it off limits? North of the 52 close to the Marine sign, there is a trail with no signage; I rode it for about a mile but wasn't sure where it connected to.
    2013 Felt Edict Nine

  29. #29
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Carloswithac View Post
    Quick question, is there a way to ride to the Sycamore Test Facility? I keep on seeing it on the map. Or is it off limits? North of the 52 close to the Marine sign, there is a trail with no signage; I rode it for about a mile but wasn't sure where it connected to.
    If you are a Marine, there's a way.

  30. #30
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    Before the Marine invasion we rode to the rocket engine test site all the time. Interesting to see.

    Lets see, when did the base convert from Navy to USMC? That's when.

  31. #31
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by CEB View Post
    Before the Marine invasion we rode to the rocket engine test site all the time. Interesting to see.

    Lets see, when did the base convert from Navy to USMC? That's when.
    weren't you the guy who was going to "ride where he wants when he wants, ride like the wind"? Whatever happened with that?

  32. #32
    banned
    Reputation: random walk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,666
    Not long before the crackdown there were posts on meetup.com inviting people to hike there and admitted it would be trespassing.

  33. #33
    Certifiably Crazy
    Reputation: Carloswithac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    Not long before the crackdown there were posts on meetup.com inviting people to hike there and admitted it would be trespassing.
    That makes sense. I found a bunch of hiking pictures and wasn't sure on the legality of it, which is why I asked. Thanks, guys!
    2013 Felt Edict Nine

  34. #34
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd View Post
    weren't you the guy who was going to "ride where he wants when he wants, ride like the wind"? Whatever happened with that?
    Yep, that's me... have not stopped or been stopped yet!

    Keep riding, leave the keyboard at home!

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by h82crash View Post
    So sad. Sycamore is one of my favorites. Here's an idea. The military is always looking for ways to connect with the community. Since that is the most remote, useless edge of the base, maybe the Marines can set it aside as a mountain bike park open to the public. Ooh, and a parking lot right behind those houses on Medina.
    I have been stationed at Pendleton for about 7 years now and just started getting into mtbing this last winter and absolutely love it. Just so you guys are aware the reason that end of base is the most deserted is because it is all designated live gunnery ranges. How bad would it look for a rider or a group of riders to get wasted by Un-Exploded Ordinance (UXO), the blame wouldn't be on the riders, it would be on the base for not keeping tight security. Not to mention it is a military installation, I ride on base, but I know where I am riding(not through a live range lol).

    On this note I have been saying for years that they need to open up an area for MX and the sorts as well, pretty sure last time I checked we have the room. Other people have been trying to push programs like this as well but end up getting shot down by the fed's and environmentalist's(which makes no sense)

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    348
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastagrog View Post
    I have been stationed at Pendleton for about 7 years now and just started getting into mtbing this last winter and absolutely love it. Just so you guys are aware the reason that end of base is the most deserted is because it is all designated live gunnery ranges. How bad would it look for a rider or a group of riders to get wasted by Un-Exploded Ordinance (UXO), the blame wouldn't be on the riders, it would be on the base for not keeping tight security. Not to mention it is a military installation, I ride on base, but I know where I am riding(not through a live range lol).

    On this note I have been saying for years that they need to open up an area for MX and the sorts as well, pretty sure last time I checked we have the room. Other people have been trying to push programs like this as well but end up getting shot down by the fed's and environmentalist's(which makes no sense)
    Thanks for your service to our country!!!! And thanks for clearing things up. Feds and Environmentalists seldom make any sense and make a formidable team against outdoor recreation on "our" federal lands. Bill

  37. #37
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastagrog View Post
    I have been stationed at Pendleton for about 7 years now and just started getting into mtbing this last winter and absolutely love it. Just so you guys are aware the reason that end of base is the most deserted is because it is all designated live gunnery ranges. How bad would it look for a rider or a group of riders to get wasted by Un-Exploded Ordinance (UXO), the blame wouldn't be on the riders, it would be on the base for not keeping tight security. Not to mention it is a military installation, I ride on base, but I know where I am riding(not through a live range lol).

    On this note I have been saying for years that they need to open up an area for MX and the sorts as well, pretty sure last time I checked we have the room. Other people have been trying to push programs like this as well but end up getting shot down by the fed's and environmentalist's(which makes no sense)
    The only problem I have with your explanation is that for years before, when the Navy had jurisdiction over Miramar, those trails existed and were ridden continuously without one single ordnance mishap. This is pertaining to the trails on Miramar, far away from Pendleton. Just like the entire thread is addressing. Personally, I would never expect the Marines to open trails on Pendleton. That sounds pretty impossible to me, from several perspectives. Miramar, with the trails on its' perimeter that have existed for decades or longer with no incidents, is another story altogether.

    Anything is possible, but following your reasoning, all of the western half of MTRP should be closed down due to the possibility of unexploded ordnance that is still there, somewhere. There's signs up to that effect warning park users not to pick up anything resembling ammo or munitions. The park used to be part of Camp Elliot, an artillery range part, to be exact..
    So was much of what is now Tierrasanta, too.

    But the park is still open, and the trails that skirt Miramar, well one of them is 100 years old...no ordnance mishaps have occurred.

    Like I said, when the Navy had jurisdiction there were no problems for anybody on those trails unless they tried to penetrate deeper toward those live fire ranges. Then the USMC security would intercept them.

    I think this change in enforcement is entirely the work of the new commanding officer and operations officers of Miramar, under the USMC.

  38. #38
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Ray View Post
    The only problem I have with your explanation is that for years before, when the Navy had jurisdiction over Miramar, those trails existed and were ridden continuously without one single ordnance mishap. This is pertaining to the trails on Miramar, far away from Pendleton. Just like the entire thread is addressing. Personally, I would never expect the Marines to open trails on Pendleton. That sounds pretty impossible to me, from several perspectives. Miramar, with the trails on its' perimeter that have existed for decades or longer with no incidents, is another story altogether.

    Anything is possible, but following your reasoning, all of the western half of MTRP should be closed down due to the possibility of unexploded ordnance that is still there, somewhere. There's signs up to that effect warning park users not to pick up anything resembling ammo or munitions. The park used to be part of Camp Elliot, an artillery range part, to be exact..
    So was much of what is now Tierrasanta, too.

    But the park is still open, and the trails that skirt Miramar, well one of them is 100 years old...no ordnance mishaps have occurred.

    Like I said, when the Navy had jurisdiction there were no problems for anybody on those trails unless they tried to penetrate deeper toward those live fire ranges. Then the USMC security would intercept them.

    I think this change in enforcement is entirely the work of the new commanding officer and operations officers of Miramar, under the USMC.
    what you're doing is trying to blame a complete and utter trails plan by the city, on the marines for quasi-enforcing their boundaries.

    Want to complain? Go to the city, your concil member, local meetings and start complaining.

    "nothing will change"... B1llshit. There's a seat open for a "user group representative" on the MTRP CAC, after CAC members said for years "no". How did this happen? By complaining in a manner that was both documented and effective, obviously.

    There's a way to change things in the long run... put yourself and others like you in a position to influence the change.

    Simply saying "oh the marines kicked us out for no good reason" doesn't make sense.

  39. #39
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    "Simply saying "oh the marines kicked us out for no good reason" doesn't make sense."

    Why not? Especially since it's that simple, and that true. There isn't any bomb/explosives in the Stowe Trail corridor, if so, it would have been found LONG ago. Environmental issues? What are the valid and sound reasons why the Stowe trail corridor is closed? When the Marines entertained the ideal of handing the land over, they wanted the city to pay millions. Explosives/bombs were not a part of the discussion, the "purchase" it was an unsuccessful "hold up". Now that the city won't pay, the "we need to protect the citizens" BS comes back.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Billinsd View Post
    Thanks for your service to our country!!!! And thanks for clearing things up. Feds and Environmentalists seldom make any sense and make a formidable team against outdoor recreation on "our" federal lands. Bill
    Thank you! ^^

    Sorry for my confusion about which base the thread was talking about, however a restricted area is still a restricted area to unauthorized personnel, I know they have the rifle range back on that part of base as well facing the east.

    And dont think for a second that I drank the Kool-aid and became a robot. I cant stand a good 90% of California's land use laws, I'm originally from Central Oregon and land use up there is a lot more lax. Though rules are still rules, laws still laws and the only way to change them(already mentioned) is to get into a position of political influence to fight back on the BS and Bureaucracy this state seams to welcome aboard with open arms.

  41. #41
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578

    Good job!

    Quote Originally Posted by CEB View Post
    "Simply saying "oh the marines kicked us out for no good reason" doesn't make sense."

    Why not? Especially since it's that simple, and that true. There isn't any bomb/explosives in the Stowe Trail corridor, if so, it would have been found LONG ago. Environmental issues? What are the valid and sound reasons why the Stowe trail corridor is closed? When the Marines entertained the ideal of handing the land over, they wanted the city to pay millions. Explosives/bombs were not a part of the discussion, the "purchase" it was an unsuccessful "hold up". Now that the city won't pay, the "we need to protect the citizens" BS comes back.
    you ride there all the time, what are you complaining about? Doesn't sound like you got kicked out at all.

    Why do you ride there?
    Because the city has failed at planning and implementing a proper trails plan and you have nowhere else to ride.

  42. #42
    CEB
    CEB is offline
    The beauty surrounds
    Reputation: CEB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd View Post
    you ride there all the time, what are you complaining about? Doesn't sound like you got kicked out at all.

    Why do you ride there?
    Because the city has failed at planning and implementing a proper trails plan and you have nowhere else to ride.
    No complaints here. I have found a way to make the most of it. I ride there because it is close to home. My only run in with the boys in green was approx 3 years ago. While lecturing me on "environmental sensitivity", the grunt's 4 wheel ATV was leaking/dripping gas from it's tank. Once that was brought to his attention, he KNEW he was the fool and needed to get "back to base" and secure that leak. Another in the group (a hiker that was stopped at the same time) literally laughed in his face and told him his "mission to secure the base borders" is flawed. I thought was was real funny. Poor little grunt really had nothing to say as the smell of gasoline wafted though the area.

    I am NOT leaning on the argument the "city" has failed me due to lack of planning. When the city (gov't) gets involved, the resulting "trails" ..... well.... you know where that goes. Lets just say I USED to ride DMM, but the various agencies involved there has all but shut it down. Now the Tunnels etc is the land of poachers and "illegal" riders. While I will ride dirt roads it's not preferred. Enjoy your ride where ever that may be.

  43. #43
    banned
    Reputation: random walk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,666
    This caught me by surprise, I thought the Sycamore Cyn. land purchase effort had stalled.

    San Diego County Approves Land Purchase To Connect Santee, Poway Trail Systems | KPBS

  44. #44
    most memberable
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    691
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    This caught me by surprise, I thought the Sycamore Cyn. land purchase effort had stalled.

    San Diego County Approves Land Purchase To Connect Santee, Poway Trail Systems | KPBS
    That's really great news!

    Just wondering how fricken long before all the enviro/signage/trail sanitizing stuff needs to be done before it opens up???

  45. #45
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    This caught me by surprise, I thought the Sycamore Cyn. land purchase effort had stalled.

    San Diego County Approves Land Purchase To Connect Santee, Poway Trail Systems | KPBS
    I'm fairly hesitant to believe the marine land/connector was purchased. The wording is rather cloudy, stating it is part of Goodan Ranch Preserve. Will email Monday but as of right now "west of Route 67, near Poway" is quite aways from Santee/Lakeside where the enforcement and signs have been placed.

  46. #46
    most memberable
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    691
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd View Post
    I'm fairly hesitant to believe the marine land/connector was purchased. The wording is rather cloudy, stating it is part of Goodan Ranch Preserve. Will email Monday but as of right now "west of Route 67, near Poway" is quite aways from Santee/Lakeside where the enforcement and signs have been placed.
    That's just one of the two purchases, read the whole article.

  47. #47
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by RTSO2112 View Post
    That's just one of the two purchases, read the whole article.
    I done did writ the entire articul... It say de other purchase is in Escondido creek Preserve...

    "The bird, which was listed as a threatened species in 1993 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, also lives in the area of the second acquisition, around 240 acres in the Escondido Creek Preserve near Harmony Grove Road in the North County."

  48. #48
    banned
    Reputation: random walk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd View Post
    I'm fairly hesitant to believe the marine land/connector was purchased. The wording is rather cloudy, stating it is part of Goodan Ranch Preserve. Will email Monday but as of right now "west of Route 67, near Poway" is quite aways from Santee/Lakeside where the enforcement and signs have been placed.
    Yeah, after re-reading I can see how different conclusions can be drawn. I took "for" the Goodan Ranch Preserve to mean the 100 acres would be added to it, and extend south to Santee Lakes -- essentially that strip of land that contains the Stowe trail.

  49. #49
    most memberable
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    691
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    Yeah, after re-reading I can see how different conclusions can be drawn. I took "for" the Goodan Ranch Preserve to mean the 100 acres would be added to it, and extend south to Santee Lakes -- essentially that strip of land that contains the Stowe trail.
    And, to think, I thought I was the only rocket scientist in residence here! ;-)

  50. #50
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by random walk View Post
    Yeah, after re-reading I can see how different conclusions can be drawn. I took "for" the Goodan Ranch Preserve to mean the 100 acres would be added to it, and extend south to Santee Lakes -- essentially that strip of land that contains the Stowe trail.
    Not being argumentative but the talk of rocket scientists pushed me to use this crazy internet thing to find facts (wait... the internet has facts? I thought it was just trolls and porn).

    In 2002 when the land was to be purchased (then stalled) it was 350 acres that was being negotiated from the marines.
    San Diego County Supervisor Dianne Jacob -*Jacob, Marines join forces to protect historic Sycamore Canyon Trail

    In 2012 a letter was sent to the Maj General Kessler lobbying for a 230 acre acquisition:
    "Dear Major General Kessler,
    Preserve Wild Santee supports the conveyance of “approximately 230 acres along
    the eastern boundary of Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar” (route of the Stowe Trail) as authorized by PL109-163, Sec. 2851. However, we believe it is in the military and public interest to execute the transaction in a partnership that conserves the adjacent 2,600-acre Fanita Ranch to reduce the growing impacts of endangered species and urban encroachment upon the base."

    There's several articles and documents avail which show the proposals and by all means, I do truly hope that one day the connector is acquired and legal.... However, my hesitation in this news release, is that we're prematurely celebrating as the 100 acres does not match up with any of the previous proposals of what is needed for a connector. I know Dianne Jacobs and her office are working on things but lets not put the cart before the horse. Progress is being made but a celebration at this point is a bit early.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. how to connect sycamore canyon to los penasquitos canyon?
    By ihaveagibsonsg in forum California - Socal
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-28-2015, 12:24 PM
  2. Sycamore Canyon ???
    By rcrscott29 in forum California - Socal
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 09:21 PM
  3. Sycamore Canyon is burning.
    By Mountain Cycle Shawn in forum California - Socal
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-17-2013, 12:04 PM
  4. armed marines at sycamore canyon
    By bmxpimp in forum California - Socal
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-13-2011, 04:30 PM
  5. Sycamore Canyon race
    By DIRT7958 in forum California - Socal
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-05-2011, 10:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •