Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 78
  1. #1
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724

    $675 Tickets for Riding Singletrack Near Spring Canyon!!

    I was told today that MTRP rangers are now writing $675 tickets for those caught riding the newer singletrack which parallels the fireroad leading from the grasslands to spring canyon. You may have noticed the new "Trail closed" signs recently installed and apparently there are some endangered birds nesting under the 52 which they are trying to protect by closing the trail. I hope the birds don't mind the construction from the 52 expansion.

    Yesterday one of the rangers wrote 7 of these tickets!

  2. #2
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Since the state budget is all F'd up, how else do you think they are going to fund the 52 expansion?

    Thanks for the heads up.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    87
    What a EFFIN JOKE .......... we rode that trail the other day it is really nice. I am sure those birds are still chillin after the fire last week about 50 yards away? Not to mention the bull dozer tracks all over the mountain? Wonder if they plan on replanting all the crap that was bull dozed and cleaning those up too?

  4. #4
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by V2PRODUCTS
    What a EFFIN JOKE .......... we rode that trail the other day it is really nice. I am sure those birds are still chillin after the fire last week about 50 yards away? Not to mention the bull dozer tracks all over the mountain? Wonder if they plan on replanting all the crap that was bull dozed and cleaning those up too?
    I think it was inevitable considering the trail was never a legit trail to begin with and it was within the boundaries of MTRP. It was a great bypass when the fireroad was all muddy in the winter.

  5. #5
    Liaison
    Reputation: Gardner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    206

    Please don't ride this singletrack

    I heard the ranger did issue some tickets. (seven?). MTRP staff could be frustrated that someone would remove dead fall placed in the closed trail and people are riding past the closed trail sign. The area has sensitive species and the trail will remain closed and staff will continue to issue tickets.
    As far as I can tell, once you're south of 52 you're in preserve land. We're working with the park to improve communication and obviously we have a way to go. Please don't ride this closed section. Don't be a butt head and remove deadfall from the trail. Don't ride trails in the preserve that are marked closed.
    It would be great if we had an alternative way into Spring Canyon when the road is wet but a trail 200 feet west of the easement is not the solution.
    Mountain bike relations are stretched in the park right now. Don't make it worse by pissing Mel off. As you see, some parks don't have the time to enforce trail closures but if provoked will find the time needed.
    Last edited by Gardner; 09-20-2008 at 06:54 AM.
    SDMBA Liaison, Sycamore Canyon/Goodan Ranch Open Space Preserves

  6. #6
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578
    Quote Originally Posted by Gardner
    It would be great if we had an alternative way into Spring Canyon when the road is wet but a trail 200 feet west of the easement is not the solution.
    .
    That little piece of trail is an incredible way to prevent horses and bikes from being on the same trail. I ride there a lot. It is the perfect piece to go up and out of the way when equestrians are on the main "trail". Go out there on the weekend, 1/2 mile from the horse staging area and you will pretty much see horses on the mail fire road.

    No warning from Mel?

    No warning to the SDMBA or asking them to convey the message?

    No warnings on the kiosk signs?

    Just one day a sign is up and tickets are being issued?

    I would very much like to hear both sides of the story but in the end, seems like a pretty good revenue generator for the park.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    47
    Why don't the government just make it an even $1 million fine? Same for littering...

    These irrational fines remind me of the old movie "Repo Man" when Harry Dean Stanton is driving down skid row and commenting with contempt about the bums, something like,"I wonder how much they owe? if they were only a way of making them all pay."

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    937
    they don;t need to issues warnings. We all know that trail was illegal. Do the police need to warn people before they speed? no. the people know it is illegal

  9. #9
    ocd
    ocd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    578

    nah, not at all

    Quote Originally Posted by DukeNeverwinter
    they don;t need to issues warnings. We all know that trail was illegal. Do the police need to warn people before they speed? no. the people know it is illegal
    How do "the people know" it is illegal?

    I have spoke to a ton of people in mission trails that it is their first time there. They read about it on line, someone told them about it etc. They are not familiar with the trails, what is or is not legal, especially for bikes. Many/most of those who ride beyond park limits and ride connecting trails may know they are in the wrong but the average joe who pops out tot he grasslands and sees that trail can be very much guilty of just being clueless.

    Working to educate the trails users is much more productive than just going straight for their wallets.

    By the way, yes police need to warn people before they speed. This is why speed limit signs are posted. Speaking of. One could sit on Father Junipero Serra trail and target speeding cars and pull in at least one to two an hour for exceeding the 15MPH speed limit.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    937
    I apologize. coming from a work environment where EVERYBODY wants a warning, it is hard to sympathize. You can;t give every one a warning. This is because all you will ever give is warnings. at some point you just have to start writing cites. It will piss people off, but it has to be done. And yes I knew it was illegal when I started riding out there even before I knew MTBR existed. It isn't listed on any maps for no reason. If you look at the mission trails map that they give out It isn't on it. wonder why.

  11. #11
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by ocd
    How do "the people know" it is illegal?

    I have spoke to a ton of people in mission trails that it is their first time there. They read about it on line, someone told them about it etc. They are not familiar with the trails, what is or is not legal, especially for bikes. Many/most of those who ride beyond park limits and ride connecting trails may know they are in the wrong but the average joe who pops out tot he grasslands and sees that trail can be very much guilty of just being clueless.

    Working to educate the trails users is much more productive than just going straight for their wallets.

    By the way, yes police need to warn people before they speed. This is why speed limit signs are posted. Speaking of. One could sit on Father Junipero Serra trail and target speeding cars and pull in at least one to two an hour for exceeding the 15MPH speed limit.
    Hey ocd, we aren't talking about all of the trails north of the 52 being closed. It's just the short singletrack section west of the fireroad leading to Spring Canyon. The trail is closed from the grasslands area to just north of the 52. The trail closure is marked on the north and south end of the closure with very obvious signs. Trails north of the 52 are not marked closed, but we all ride them at our own risk.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    97
    I no longer live in San Diego, but I used to. From '89 through 2002, Mission Trails was the area I rode most often. In the "old days", the most you had to worry about was getting busted by military police on the fireroads leading to the Miramar base. But I digress...

    This horsesh!t about closing a trail to protect some endangered species bird is typical of the liberal do-gooders out there. Let's see now, the birds are nesting UNDER A HIGHWAY OVERPASS, for crying out loud. Thousands upon thousands of cars rumbling by overhead, polllution, trash thrown out windows. Yet, somehow, bicycles going by underneath is going to wreak havoc on these precious birds and, what, throw the entire ecosystem out of balance and cause the end of the world?

    You'd think if the bird was so sensitive to noise and humans, it would've picked a more secluded spot. It wouldn't be hard to do, considering the vast expanses of land right nearby.

    And if San Diego is so concerned over the ability of these birds to reproduce, why aren't they closing down the 52 at the overpass? For that matter, why didn't they put the brakes on all the development in that area and around Penasquitos years ago?

    Oh, wait - I know. The developers carry a big stick and, well, everyone wants to live in paradise, right?

    All this is about is a city park trying to avoid problems from the whackjobs at the Sierra Club. That and bringing in some extra money with exorbitant fines.

  13. #13
    Hardbooter
    Reputation: KingCrimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    534
    Haven't been out to MTRP in the past 3 weeks, but we're talking about the singletrack just to the left of the road as you're headed out to the base?

    That's the only way to make the ride bearable. The fireroad is boring!

  14. #14
    Trying a little
    Reputation: dusthuffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,781
    Government and Politicians make mistakes. But they are answerable to the people, the people just seem to forget that fact a lot and get apathetic, it's a hell of a lot easier than forming committees getting petitions signed and lobbying. Anyway, I for one call BS on the six hundred and seventy five dollar tickets, as in, I don't for a minute believe the amount. Maybe 6.75?

    I never apologize. I'm sorry, but that's just the way I am.

  15. #15
    San Diego County
    Reputation: Duzitall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,475
    Quote Originally Posted by justanotherbikegeek
    This horsesh!t about closing a trail to protect some endangered species bird is typical of the liberal do-gooders out there. Let's see now, the birds are nesting UNDER A HIGHWAY OVERPASS, for crying out loud. Yet, somehow, bicycles going by underneath is going to wreak havoc on these precious birds and, what, throw the entire ecosystem out of balance and cause the end of the world?

    You'd think if the bird was so sensitive to noise and humans, it would've picked a more secluded spot. It wouldn't be hard to do, considering the vast expanses of land right nearby.

    All this is about is a city park trying to avoid problems from the whackjobs at the Sierra Club. That and bringing in some extra money with exorbitant fines.
    I agree and I'll add that when Caltrans widened the 94 at Rancho they spent $1.5 million on a plywood wall to protect a bird from being irritated by the construction NEXT TO A FLIPPING HIGHWAY

    All the fence did was waste resources, money and provided a safe village for the homeless drunks and druggys.

    I am an endangered species too None the less, I will honor the closure.
    Last edited by Duzitall; 09-21-2008 at 10:19 AM.

  16. #16
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    Quote Originally Posted by Duzitall
    illigal immigrants remain there unharrassed spreading trash and deficating in watersheds but I'll stop now.
    Not entirely true.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  17. #17
    San Diego County
    Reputation: Duzitall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    Not entirely true.
    OK, you are correct. I should have said largely unharrassed by the authorities. Instead I will just delete the line about homeless drunks, druggys and illegals. That line was off topic anyway. Sorry, I'm just irritated today because I have to work and won't get to ride

  18. #18
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Everybody is getting worked up over nothing. The trail that was closed was nothing more than a duplicate of existing trail. This is a short section of trail on the south side of the 52 and NOT the single track extending into Spring Canyon.
    We have seen this before in heavily used areas. They are attempting to preserve the land. Is it perfect? No but it helps ensure the trails don't get too out of hand. PQ has put in split rail fence at the east end to keep people on the main trail. Over time that trail kept migrating south, up the hill. In Hodges, the Bernardo trail rock gardens were closes because it was listed as a duplicate trail to the main fire road.
    Yes the 50 yard section of fire road heading towards the 52 sucks when it rains but you need to man up! Either don't ride when it is wet or ride through the water and mud on the existing trail. Never,ever cut a new trail to avoid a hazard, especially in a governed park. How many of you saw, first hand, the damage inflicted in Sycamore Canyon, along Santee Lakes from people not wanting to get dirty? Its mountain biking for christs sake!

  19. #19
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by dusthuffer
    Anyway, I for one call BS on the six hundred and seventy five dollar tickets, as in, I don't for a minute believe the amount. Maybe 6.75?
    If you don't believe me call Mel directly. His number is here. I'd love to be wrong about a $675 ticket.

  20. #20
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by bankerboy
    Everybody is getting worked up over nothing. The trail that was closed was nothing more than a duplicate of existing trail. This is a short section of trail on the south side of the 52 and NOT the single track extending into Spring Canyon.
    We have seen this before in heavily used areas. They are attempting to preserve the land. Is it perfect? No but it helps ensure the trails don't get too out of hand. PQ has put in split rail fence at the east end to keep people on the main trail. Over time that trail kept migrating south, up the hill. In Hodges, the Bernardo trail rock gardens were closes because it was listed as a duplicate trail to the main fire road.
    Yes the 50 yard section of fire road heading towards the 52 sucks when it rains but you need to man up! Either don't ride when it is wet or ride through the water and mud on the existing trail. Never,ever cut a new trail to avoid a hazard, especially in a governed park. How many of you saw, first hand, the damage inflicted in Sycamore Canyon, along Santee Lakes from people not wanting to get dirty? Its mountain biking for christs sake!
    Couldn't agree more banker, but that fireroad sucks in the winter. The clay clings to your tires like nothing else.

  21. #21
    Well Biked
    Reputation: scepticshock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,543

    Anger management

    I was just out there today, and although I often consider myself a greeny at heart, a lot of this reeks of overmanagement and an anti-trail mentality. The bird excuse is silly. The sensitive habitat sign doesn't make sense. The place just burned up, and it will quickly regenerate and burn again.

    That new section of single track was a good alternative because it allowed bike to avoid horses, as well as improving the park experience. Most of the San Diego parks seems to have this mentality of why can't everyone just be happy traveling together on a big wide truck road. Why would we need any more trails? Well, that's the parks name isn't it? Mission Trails?

  22. #22
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by mealsonwheels
    Couldn't agree more banker, but that fireroad sucks in the winter. The clay clings to your tires like nothing else.
    First off, this is not directed specifically at you as I doubt you created the trail, but trail is trail, fire road or not. If the clay clings to your bike, hike (gasp), yes hike through the offending areas or stay out. If these options seem a little too extreme, ask yourself why you need to ride in an area that for one to two months is unridable. Look at other areas of the country that have rain, snow, eternal darkness (anywhere north of the arctic circle) and be happy for what we have. 10+ months of near perfect weather punctuated by 2 iffy months at worst. There are so many options and other locations during this time. Mountain Bike Bill used to have a great wet weather resource page. While it was not official it did a nice job of spelling out where are the best places to ride. The fact of the matter is San Diego is full of clay. How did you think the missions and other adobe buildings were created? We just need to give the ground the time it needs to recover after a rain. Think cross training - running, road riding, surfing (winter storm swells), there are tons of possibilites.
    Now I am getting way off topic - bottom line, there is no need for a fifty yard duplicate trail that avoids a hazard that makes mountain biking, well, dirty mountain biking. As long as you take time to clean your mount at home, there is nothing wrong with a little dirt.

    Thanks for the ear.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    937
    ditto ^^^^^. if you don't want your bike to get wet/dirty don't ride it.

  24. #24
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by bankerboy
    First off, this is not directed specifically at you as I doubt you created the trail, but trail is trail, fire road or not. If the clay clings to your bike, hike (gasp), yes hike through the offending areas or stay out. If these options seem a little too extreme, ask yourself why you need to ride in an area that for one to two months is unridable. Look at other areas of the country that have rain, snow, eternal darkness (anywhere north of the arctic circle) and be happy for what we have. 10+ months of near perfect weather punctuated by 2 iffy months at worst. There are so many options and other locations during this time. Mountain Bike Bill used to have a great wet weather resource page. While it was not official it did a nice job of spelling out where are the best places to ride. The fact of the matter is San Diego is full of clay. How did you think the missions and other adobe buildings were created? We just need to give the ground the time it needs to recover after a rain. Think cross training - running, road riding, surfing (winter storm swells), there are tons of possibilites.
    Now I am getting way off topic - bottom line, there is no need for a fifty yard duplicate trail that avoids a hazard that makes mountain biking, well, dirty mountain biking. As long as you take time to clean your mount at home, there is nothing wrong with a little dirt.

    Thanks for the ear.
    I don't mind getting my bike dirty, but clay which collects on tires, frame and fork to the point that wheels won't spin isn't my idea of fun. I guess other people here enjoy it. IMHO there is very little clay north of the 52, but from the grasslands to the 52 it's horrendous in the winter. The singletrack was a great way to bypass the clay, but it was inevitable that the trail would eventually be closed. Fortunately there are several ways to get into spring without going through that section. Like you said, I prefer other trails in the winter that drain better and are comprised of DG. I just can't get into the roadie thing.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    87
    IMO ..... it has nothing to do with the clay. The fire road sucks ..... BOTTOM LINE. The single track was more fun and a PERFECT way to avoid horses and hikers. Its closed now end of story i guess. I had NO CLUE it was an ILLEGAL TRACK until i saw the sign. Now that the sign is posted rider beware. Now for the million $$$$ question. How far past the 52 can you LEGALLY RIDE? I know the single track is closed from the grass land to just north of the 52. Then north of the 52 there is no closed sign? So is it ok to get on that single track north of the 52?

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    326

    Upset

    Quote Originally Posted by mealsonwheels
    I was told today that MTRP rangers are now writing $675 tickets for those caught riding the newer singletrack which parallels the fireroad leading from the grasslands to spring canyon. You may have noticed the new "Trail closed" signs recently installed and apparently there are some endangered birds nesting under the 52 which they are trying to protect by closing the trail. I hope the birds don't mind the construction from the 52 expansion.

    Yesterday one of the rangers wrote 7 of these tickets!
    sweet. another WIN for the GD earth worshipping dope smoking communist c0cksucking tree huggers.

    the endangered species act is one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation ever passed. literally cutting humans off from millions of acres of land. it's sickening.

    go feinstein! go boxer!! keep voting those cvnts into office and watch your access to land be cut off off more and more!!! (you stupid bleeding heart 'american' d-bags!!)
    It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults of others and to forget his own.

    - Cicero

  27. #27
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    Ranger Mel said you are ok if you stay south of Lat. 5221 on the grid, which translates to South of the huge Oak tree and water tank. If you go up to the ridge, Military Police can/will confiscate your bike.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  28. #28
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by mild beast
    sweet. another WIN for the GD earth worshipping dope smoking communist c0cksucking tree huggers.

    the endangered species act is one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation ever passed. literally cutting humans off from millions of acres of land. it's sickening.

    go feinstein! go boxer!! keep voting those cvnts into office and watch your access to land be cut off off more and more!!! (you stupid bleeding heart 'american' d-bags!!)

    Easy there, killer. Don't go Rambo on the world just yet.

    No land access has been lost. A short, duplicate trail has been mitigated (closed). They may have used birds as the reason but the fact of the mater is the single track was only 4 feet off of the main trail. The more probable reason is to keep the traffic, foot, pedal, and equestrian in check. If not, you wind up with a 20 foot wide, three lane fire road.

    For the record, I am a fully against land closures for any reason other than safety sake like bombing ranges. Animals are adaptable to human presents and will get over it. I do, however, believe in logical trail control for the sake of all parties. There are tons of small, short illegal single tracks that we all ride from time to time. You just have to ask yourself, how long to you want the areas to remain open. Treat them right and legal, and they will be there for some time. Mistreat them and you are on a surefire road to closure.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    326
    whatever.. "i" lost millions of acres in the "mojave preserve" (for ffvcking what??!!) to some dune grass and a gd lizard.

    pffffft.. 2 different phd students went out there with their chips firmly attached to their shoulders. very ready to show the world and the rest of the "Yeah, that was my masters thesis / phd thesis that got that area shut down.. thank you Endangered Species Act!!" crowd what they could do. i actually met the surly kvnt who was studying the lizards on one trip.. man, was that woman power tripping. going full throttle .. just wet with excitement at the prospect of getting another HUGE land grab by the Fed Gov area shut down. and she did.

    feinstein, boxer and cranston before them. just ripping off huge hunks of land.

    see, tools like you that live in L.A.. it's all coffee table books. it's not reality to you. sure, you get out there once or twice a year and gape out / grizwald out at some "spring flowers" or some other crap. i live out here.

    jeez.. the Haiwee Resevoir.. nowhere near LA. but the LADWP own the water rights so the sh!tty city of LA decided to close off access to that resevoir for fear of TERRORISTS putting chemicals in it. POS's.. live 100's of miles away from here, yet dictate land access policies.

    sickens me. all these tools that just sit back and eat up all the cr@p these bleeding heart politicians spew.. "OMG!! Diane Feinstein said the sky is falling!! So it is a good thing to close off access to the Dome Lands Wilderness!!" POS. $hit eating bleeding heart worthless whing liberal earth worshipping losers.
    It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults of others and to forget his own.

    - Cicero

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    326
    asdf
    It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults of others and to forget his own.

    - Cicero

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EBasil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,087
    Dude! Over the top, man! First, it wasn't those pansy-ass liberals that fenced off your resevoir riding area, it was the Big Brother conservatives that went hog-wild on the taxpayer dollar with every freaking project they could gin up and claim "national security" to secure funding for. But what the heck does that have to do with a tiny, redundant trail in a preserve you don't even ride at?

    Nothing.

    Ranger Mel is writin' tickets. He loves to write tickets. We have some fair warning, we of the internet geek clan. Bonus.

  32. #32
    San Diego County
    Reputation: Duzitall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,475
    I think those birds immigrated here illegally anyway. I wish I could leave work right now and go riding out there and see if they have their visas

  33. #33
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by mild beast
    see, tools like you that live in L.A.. it's all coffee table books. it's not reality to you. sure, you get out there once or twice a year and gape out / grizwald out at some "spring flowers" or some other crap. i live out here.
    First, I live in San Diego. Second, I am on my bike at least 3 times a week. Third, why the personal attack over something I have neither instigated nor enforced?

    The ranting and colorful language has only helped to obscure your point. It would be a greater help if you got involved with the various agencies that restrict land access. Those that own the toys make the rules and I guarantee WE do not own the toys. Attend meetings, write letter to your representative, get involved. It is helping in areas like PQ and Mission Trails. If we don't, we loose land access. Just look at Carlsbad/Flightline for your example. We got screwed out of an exceptional parcel of land because developers beat us to the punch.

    Anybody can post. The question is what are you doing to help?

  34. #34
    Older & Faster...downhill
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    445
    Quote Originally Posted by bankerboy
    Attend meetings, write letter to your representative, get involved.
    and vote!

  35. #35
    BM and PQ Trail Rep
    Reputation: bankerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Margaritaman
    and vote!
    OOPS!!! Forgot that one. Get the politicians who support us in office and we will be in a far better place. Thanks for the reminder.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,126
    Quote Originally Posted by bankerboy
    First, I live in San Diego. Second, I am on my bike at least 3 times a week. Third, why the personal attack over something I have neither instigated nor enforced?

    The ranting and colorful language has only helped to obscure your point. It would be a greater help if you got involved with the various agencies that restrict land access. Those that own the toys make the rules and I guarantee WE do not own the toys. Attend meetings, write letter to your representative, get involved. It is helping in areas like PQ and Mission Trails. If we don't, we loose land access. Just look at Carlsbad/Flightline for your example. We got screwed out of an exceptional parcel of land because developers beat us to the punch.

    Anybody can post. The question is what are you doing to help?
    How dare you? Injecting reason into a flame fest? That's not nearly as exciting as squirting some gasoline on a fire...

  37. #37
    Hardbooter
    Reputation: KingCrimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    534
    It's JUST to the 52?

    Big deal, it's 3 minutes of riding after you get off the asphalt.

    Don't recall water tanks or a big oak tree, are they past the sign? I usually try to turn around at the sign.

  38. #38
    "Ride Lots" - Eddie Mercx
    Reputation: Yeti_Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,316
    Quote Originally Posted by mealsonwheels
    Couldn't agree more banker, but that fireroad sucks in the winter. The clay clings to your tires like nothing else.
    there's no clay in the soil to the immediate left or right of a fireroad?

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by KingCrimson
    It's JUST to the 52?
    Big deal, it's 3 minutes of riding after you get off the asphalt.
    I agree as long as it is REALLY open after the 52?

    Quote Originally Posted by KingCrimson
    Don't recall water tanks or a big oak tree, are they past the sign? I usually try to turn around at the sign.
    I have not seen those either. So not too sure? From what i understand the whole valley is open as long as you dont go up to the top of any of the ridges?

  40. #40
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    I'm meeting with Ranger Mel tomorrow about another matter, I'll verify the farthest north one may ride in Spring Canyon and post tomorrow afternoon. From my notes from a previous meeting, the Ranger mentioned grid line 5221, which, according to Google earth is 1.67 miles from the 52. DON'T hold me too this, it might have been line 52.21. I'll let you all know tomorrow.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  41. #41
    Hardbooter
    Reputation: KingCrimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    534
    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    I'm meeting with Ranger Mel tomorrow about another matter, I'll verify the farthest north one may ride in Spring Canyon and post tomorrow afternoon. From my notes from a previous meeting, the Ranger mentioned grid line 5221, which, according to Google earth is 1.67 miles from the 52. DON'T hold me too this, it might have been line 52.21. I'll let you all know tomorrow.

    Definitive answers, always a good thing with 675 dollars involved.

    Thanks!

    Waitta second. I go way past there all the time. 1.67? It's almost a mile just getting to the 52..

  42. #42
    wanna dance?
    Reputation: HotBlack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,074
    Wow. Fourth thread in a row.

    If you are mountain bikers, then for as long as I live here, I am not. I'll be of no service to your cause. If everyone loses their trails, it will be because enough of you did everything you could to deserve it.

    What thoroughly awful people.

    No sympathy at all.

  43. #43
    Hardbooter
    Reputation: KingCrimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    534
    Enlighten me.

    Where are these other 3 threads?

  44. #44
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    Quote Originally Posted by HotBlack
    If you are mountain bikers, then for as long as I live here, I am not. I'll be of no service to your cause. If everyone loses their trails, it will be because enough of you did everything you could to deserve it.

    What thoroughly awful people.

    No sympathy at all
    HotBlack,

    Please explain. It seems people are trying to find the official status of Spring Canyon in order to ride there responsibly. I will post exact coordinates and trail mileage tomorrow. I'd still like to here what's on your mind.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  45. #45
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    First of all, stay off the duplicate trail. There are at least two sets of signs stating to stay off. The trail is not needed, it is not open for discussion, please use the authorized access.

    As of today, full legal access is allowed up to grid line 52.21, which is about 1.75 miles in. A little farther up, the trail splits, one going NW, the other going NE. Going NE has you trespassing on private property, PLEASE DON"T! The trail going NW will soon be part of the Mission Trails Regional Park system. This is the trail that goes to the lower ridge and allows one to make a loop.

    Stupid me suggested installing a sign at the fork to inform trail users to turn around. I'm glad sane people were present to shoot my stupid idea down. To think I helped get the trail shut down because some assshole destroyed the sign, property of the City, an act of total disrespect, I don't think I could live with myself.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  46. #46
    Hardbooter
    Reputation: KingCrimson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    534
    You lost me at grid line..

    I think it would be endlessly helpful if you made a Google Map of the loop.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    First of all, stay off the duplicate trail. There are at least two sets of signs stating to stay off. The trail is not needed, it is not open for discussion, please use the authorized access.
    But is the single track open north of the 52?: I know it is closed and signs are posted south of the 52.

    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    As of today, full legal access is allowed up to grid line 52.21, which is about 1.75 miles in.
    1.75 miles AFTER going under the 52? or 1.75 miles TOTAL?

    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    The trail going NW will soon be part of the Mission Trails Regional Park system. This is the trail that goes to the lower ridge and allows one to make a loop.

    SWEET ................. so is it ok to ride the nw trail now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    To think I helped get the trail shut down because some assshole destroyed the sign, property of the City, an act of total disrespect, I don't think I could live with myself.
    I think if they give the trails there own names and posted the trail name signs with an arrow telling what way to go to stay on the trail the signs would be fine. Its usually the signs that tell you to stop ..... turn around or dont trespass that get effed up. Just sayin ......

  48. #48
    I <3 Dirt
    Reputation: mealsonwheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot
    First of all, stay off the duplicate trail. There are at least two sets of signs stating to stay off. The trail is not needed,
    Hey BP, I guess my fear is that when Spring becomes part of MTRP, the newer singletrack on the west side of the canyon will be closed since it is a "duplicate trail". Same goes for Sycamore which has between 2-3 "duplicate trails". What are your thoughts?

    When you said the oak tree and water tank did you mean the Eucalyptus tree at the top of the ridge between spring/oak with the rusted barrel? That's the only prominent tree I can think of out there.

  49. #49
    Single(Pivot)and Happy
    Reputation: Boulder Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,461
    Quote Originally Posted by mealsonwheels
    Hey BP, I guess my fear is that when Spring becomes part of MTRP, the newer singletrack on the west side of the canyon will be closed since it is a "duplicate trail". Same goes for Sycamore which has between 2-3 "duplicate trails". What are your thoughts?

    When you said the oak tree and water tank did you mean the Eucalyptus tree at the top of the ridge between spring/oak with the rusted barrel? That's the only prominent tree I can think of out there.
    You are correct, the eucalyptus and rusted 55 gallon barrel are the landmarks. Thank you for clarifying.

    As far as trails on the west side of the canyon, which will come under MTRP control, in my opinion, and this is only my opinion:

    The land manager will look at the existing trail system and determine which trails should stay, and which trails should be closed. Reasons for closing trails could include, but not limited to: Redundent, unsustainable, sensitive habitat,etc.

    If one is truely interested in having a say regarding the trail system in Spring Canyon, one should contact Ranger Mel at MTRP.org and SDMBA.com.

    As far as the people that were ticketed, they had three opportunities to comply. They physically removed a deadfall barrier, were asked to replace the deadfall barrier, and replied with language, directed at the Ranger, that I can't repeat here.
    The suspension of your bike sucks if it's different than mine. Really. It sucks. Big time.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,126
    Quote Originally Posted by Boulder Pilot

    As far as the people that were ticketed, they had three opportunities to comply. They physically removed a deadfall barrier, were asked to replace the deadfall barrier, and replied with language, directed at the Ranger, that I can't repeat here.

    That certainly puts a whole different light on the situation, doesn't it. Idiots.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •