Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 139
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,151

    Stop creating strava segments on non-sanctioned trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    OMFG. HK!!!!!!!!!! WTF!!!?

    Noboday cares that you can ride fast on a trail that's off the map. Please just don't do it.

    Go 9ers.
    I'm not sure how this works.

  2. #2
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    23,999
    Haha, people are their own worst enemy.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: primordial's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    112

    Click "Private"

    On Strava, Click "Private" before you save your ride, right?

    I always do that every time anyway, what's the point about showing off?!

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,151
    Is there a way to find out who sets up segments!? I think if you set up a segment, you should have your name next to it so you can't hide from your Fn stupidity.
    I'm not sure how this works.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    300
    I get your frustration but, it's going to happen. Probably not going to reach your target audience here. Besides, mtbr isn't exactly a center of logic. On the other hand, just because isn't on strava doesn't mean it's " secret".

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    325
    I agree that its dumb, but there have been illegal segments up for years and nothing has come of it... I'm sure the land managers know about 90% of these "secret" trails, but don't have time and resources to do anything about it. Its rare to even hear about someone getting a ticket. Not sure its a huge deal either way, but I could be off..

    Am I on track with this or has anyone had a different experience?

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: EBrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,405

    Re: Stop creating strava segments on non-sanctioned trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Got it. Thanks. Will stop doing that.


    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
    Are we putting air in the tires today?

  8. #8
    HTFU!
    Reputation: S.O.B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    730
    Quote Originally Posted by primordial View Post
    On Strava, Click "Private" before you save your ride, right?

    I always do that every time anyway, what's the point about showing off?!
    This is not about 'showing off'; I like to think of it as 'sharing data'. And it can be valuable, motivational etc. Riding with buddies and comparing how you did on certain climbs whether against each other or against yourself. As a personal example, after yesterday's ride, my buddy uploaded his gps results (I was using the Android App) only to find strava showed him with one less mile but ~400 more feet of climbing (on the same ride)...so I am going with his results.
    Recently I did a big ride (solo) that I saw someone else here on the norcal forum had done on Strava. I would not have been able to string everything together if he had not shared his ride. So ya see, sharing is a good thing.

    The OP is not concerned with sharing data...the concern is 'showing off' riding illegal trails. Especially when the well funded and well organized (thus influential) horse and hike lobby are looking for reasons to keep mountain bikes off certain trails and they don't need more justification (and yes, they know we hang out here and talk about stuff). Maybe that is why some shared trails have guys with radar guns pointed at mtb'ers and some oft-used 'illegal' trails have guys waiting to write mtb'ers tickets.
    I no longer deserve a signature.

  9. #9
    Let's ride
    Reputation: rensho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,133
    Yep, it is your duty to go into your Strava account and make private all the illegal segments you created, or have ridden. Also, flag to Strava any segments that are illegal.

    I have heard too many times that land managers are wondering how they received this gift that has fallen from the sky...

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Haus Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,424
    Well there is definitely a spike in law enforcement activity on Marin public lands in the last 6 months, especially foot patrols. While its only speculation, they seem to be well attuned to the most popular routes with the discovery of strava over the last year. Hopefully it will mellow out, but the local rangers seem to be digging their heels in for a prolonged fight.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KevXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    694
    Never post anything on the Internet that you would not want to read out loud in a court of law.

    News flash, the people that hate mtn biking have figured out how to use Google. Go look at the Marin IJ website for recent comments.

  12. #12
    I'm really diggin it!
    Reputation: Davey Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,170
    Quote Originally Posted by KevXR View Post
    Never post anything on the Internet that you would not want to read out loud in a court of law.

    News flash, the people that hate mtn biking have figured out how to use Google. Go look at the Marin IJ website for recent comments.
    Quote Originally Posted by Haus Boss View Post
    Well there is definitely a spike in law enforcement activity on Marin public lands in the last 6 months, especially foot patrols. While its only speculation, they seem to be well attuned to the most popular routes with the discovery of strava over the last year. Hopefully it will mellow out, but the local rangers seem to be digging their heels in for a prolonged fight.
    Quote Originally Posted by rensho View Post
    Yep, it is your duty to go into your Strava account and make private all the illegal segments you created, or have ridden. Also, flag to Strava any segments that are illegal.

    I have heard too many times that land managers are wondering how they received this gift that has fallen from the sky...
    Quote Originally Posted by Hel Mot View Post
    I get your frustration but, it's going to happen. Probably not going to reach your target audience here. Besides, mtbr isn't exactly a center of logic. On the other hand, just because isn't on strava doesn't mean it's " secret".
    I've been really worried about this for about 2 years or more. Land managers and the anti bike crowd are now fully aware. Rumors of a secret trail are one thing. GPS plots that a hater can pull up at a computer are another. Strava is the worst thing that has happened to mountain biking in ages. Sharing data is OK as long as it is done discretely. Strava was the wrong medium, the platform should have been a lot more discrete. There was a time believe it or not where you had to be trusted to learn of a new trail. Those days are over I guess.

    Apparently SAR (search and rescue) Marin has the best map. Nearly every social trail is on it. Still trying to get my hands on one.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Haus Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,424
    I thought I should share Strava's feeble response and attempt to sweep this under the carpet. I have sent numerous messages over the last 5 weeks without a peep from them. I understand this is not the same as copyright infringement, but is there not any type of law or reg that would require them to remove and attempt to block repeat illegal and hazardous segments? Clearly the current protocol is about effective as Mega Uploads attempts to remove illegal content.

    From strava, may 2012

    This is certainly part of a larger concern over private lands and unsanctioned trails, and we are aware of the issues and discussing this internally. Unfortunately, we do not have specific plans in place currently to address these issues.

    Strava does not have a way to verify property boundaries. You do have the ability to leave a comment on a segment or ride if you have information that you wish to share with a user who has ridden a specific segment.

    The Hazardous flag was *not* designed for issues around private lands or trail systems, so using this feature to address this issue will of course be unsatisfying. The Hazardous flag is meant to address hazards that may be present in the environment only.

    I hope this information is helpful to you, and we appreciate you voicing your concerns here.

    Best,
    Elle
    Strava Support Team

  14. #14
    middle ring single track
    Reputation: pliebenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,943

    Trail location is only...

    ...part of the problem. IMHO speed and time-of-day data are equally damaging to the public's image of MTB'ing. Anytime an online GPS "sharing" website enables the posting of how the file was created (hike, bike, running, snowshoe and whatever) it simplifies the task of anybody looking for data to use against trail access of a particular user group. Strava is just the worst (or best depending...) in this regard. (Disclosure; I'm a satisfied Strava user) We should like-wise "privatize" our segments if we are busting the sanctioned speed limits (or time of day). Of course I suppose that non-sanctioned trails don't have speed limits...

    I've heard it suggested that if we poach an area we should just change the type of activity from "biking" to "hiking" or "running"; we might fool some interlopers but not all---ever see a hiker (or runner) consistently traverse DH segments at 20+ MPH?

    Of course Strava could easily put an end to this by requiring the listing of speed limits and "hours open" when a segment is created; then those rides which bust the limits would automatically be privatized.

    We should discuss the "civil disobedience" (refusing to sit in the back of the bus) concept of posting our scofflaw activities in another thread. I know many bikers feel this is justification for publicizing their wayward adventures. Constitutional law anyone???
    Content here does not officially represent the CA DPR.

    Windows 10, destroying humanity one upgrade at a time.

  15. #15
    Dirty by Nature
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,574
    Yep, this info can definitely be used against us. One of the best coastal trails in Orange County was closed down a few years ago, and there was an abundance of poaching evidence on Geoladders (pre-Strava).

    I've also heard of some inland trails being closed after they were discovered--with a little help from Strava.
    Last edited by dirtvert; 02-20-2013 at 12:20 PM.
    Friends don't let friends ride e-"bikes" on dirt.

  16. #16
    I just wanna go fast!
    Reputation: bdamschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Haus Boss View Post
    I thought I should share Strava's feeble response and attempt to sweep this under the carpet. I have sent numerous messages over the last 5 weeks without a peep from them. I understand this is not the same as copyright infringement, but is there not any type of law or reg that would require them to remove and attempt to block repeat illegal and hazardous segments? Clearly the current protocol is about effective as Mega Uploads attempts to remove illegal content.

    From strava, may 2012

    This is certainly part of a larger concern over private lands and unsanctioned trails, and we are aware of the issues and discussing this internally. Unfortunately, we do not have specific plans in place currently to address these issues.

    Strava does not have a way to verify property boundaries. You do have the ability to leave a comment on a segment or ride if you have information that you wish to share with a user who has ridden a specific segment.

    The Hazardous flag was *not* designed for issues around private lands or trail systems, so using this feature to address this issue will of course be unsatisfying. The Hazardous flag is meant to address hazards that may be present in the environment only.

    I hope this information is helpful to you, and we appreciate you voicing your concerns here.

    Best,
    Elle
    Strava Support Team
    Hating on strava for people posting illegal trail segments is like hating on mountain bike manufactures for people riding illegal trail segments. It's a tool. Unfortunately it's a tool that can be used by tools.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,531
    Quote Originally Posted by bdamschen View Post
    Hating on strava for people posting illegal trail segments is like hating on mountain bike manufactures for people riding illegal trail segments. It's a tool. Unfortunately it's a tool that can be used by tools.
    What a load of crap
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtvert View Post
    Yep, this info can definitely be used against us. One of the best coastal trails in Orange County was closed down a few years ago, and there was an abundance of poaching evidence on Geoladders (pre-Strava).
    This is the first time I have heard anything specific when complaining about strava(with respect to trail access). I think the golden rule for strava haters is be as vague as possible because there is no evidence that strava has had a real impact on trail access. If I'm wrong here please let me know (with some specific examples)

    With this particular trail: I presume it was hiker only and was being poached by bikers who were using some prestrava software which alerted the land managers to the problem so they closed the trail for everyone?

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    What a load of crap
    If you dont mind me asking:

    Which trails were shut down because of strava?

    What do you think should be done about it?

  20. #20
    Wēk Ss
    Reputation: IAmHolland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,635
    Does Strava still auto-create segments? Also, marking the rides private doesn't do much because if it's auto-created it happens before you can edit your ride. Strava is pretty annoying that you have to edit to make things private. Other tools don't do that.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,151
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    This is the first time I have heard anything specific when complaining about strava(with respect to trail access). I think the golden rule for strava haters is be as vague as possible because there is no evidence that strava has had a real impact on trail access. If I'm wrong here please let me know (with some specific examples)

    With this particular trail: I presume it was hiker only and was being poached by bikers who were using some prestrava software which alerted the land managers to the problem so they closed the trail for everyone?
    This is a mountain bike only trail built by a mountain biker and was being kept low key. Then some jack hole made a segment. When you make a segment, this gets announced to everyone who follows you so now rather than keeping a good thing low key, you have announced to a wide network of people that a cool secret trail exists and, by the way, here it is everyone. I am not harking on Strava but rather the idiots who think it's cool to announce these trails for the sake of looking macho.
    I'm not sure how this works.

  22. #22
    Axe
    Axe is online now
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,979
    While I completely agree with the general premise of this thread... I have discovered a number of great trails by going over mtbguru when it was still functioning and Strava. I do not have other means to find out as I usually do not have time to hook up with the right people to show me.. Maybe some less public way of sharing some gpx tracks would be useful to me..

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by squashyo View Post
    This is a mountain bike only trail built by a mountain biker and was being kept low key. Then some jack hole made a segment. When you make a segment, this gets announced to everyone who follows you so now rather than keeping a good thing low key, you have announced to a wide network of people that a cool secret trail exists and, by the way, here it is everyone. I am not harking on Strava but rather the idiots who think it's cool to announce these trails for the sake of looking macho.
    I see your point and if that segment gets closed down that would really suck. What I'm wondering is if it will get closed down, I'm thinking the attention it draws won't provoke any action. Like I said I could be totally off, but I think it raises more of a stink on message boards that it actually alerts land managers to poaching.

    I'm not saying go strava illegal trails, I think that's a bad idea. I'm thinking this might be much ado about nothing because no one ever actually says "I no longer ride here because of strava." They only say, "Strava is so stupid."

  24. #24
    Dirty by Nature
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,574
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    With this particular trail: I presume it was hiker only and was being poached by bikers who were using some prestrava software which alerted the land managers to the problem so they closed the trail for everyone?
    It was strictly a poach trail in El Morro State Park. Mtb-ers called it a "historic" trail, because it pre-dated the park, but it wasn't listed on the initial map of the park for various reasons (wildlife corridor, arch site). I volunteered for the park--as well as a county park--and the rangers routinely cited online biking sites as evidence of poaching and justification of trail closures. One park in OC even closed the entire park to cyclists for a few months for poaching.
    Friends don't let friends ride e-"bikes" on dirt.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,151
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    I see your point and if that segment gets closed down that would really suck. What I'm wondering is if it will get closed down, I'm thinking the attention it draws won't provoke any action. Like I said I could be totally off, but I think it raises more of a stink on message boards that it actually alerts land managers to poaching.

    I'm not saying go strava illegal trails, I think that's a bad idea. I'm thinking this might be much ado about nothing because no one ever actually says "I no longer ride here because of strava." They only say, "Strava is so stupid."
    Yeah, I don't know but if the segments create a surge in traffic because everyone wants to go ride the new trail, it starts to get a lot of attention. Friends tell their friends, exits and entrances get blown out, people see others exit the trail and scout, sweet virgin trail gets a little more blown out faster, yadda yadda yadda.
    I'm not sure how this works.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    607
    Quote Originally Posted by dirtvert View Post
    It was strictly a poach trail in El Morro State Park. Mtb-ers called it a "historic" trail, because it pre-dated the park, but it wasn't listed on the initial map of the park for various reasons (wildlife corridor, arch site). I volunteered for the park--as well as a county park--and the rangers routinely cited online biking sites as evidence of poaching and justification of trail closures. One park in OC even closed the entire park to cyclists for a few months for poaching.
    Thanks for the reply. Like I said this is the first time I have heard anything that actually caused action in the real world because of strava(or any gps/map/timer software). I realize because of the nature of poaching we cant be terribly specific, but usually complaints about strava sound like people are jumping to conclusions with nothing tangible.

  27. #27
    I'm really diggin it!
    Reputation: Davey Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,170
    Quote Originally Posted by rensho View Post
    Yep, it is your duty to go into your Strava account and make private all the illegal segments you created, or have ridden. Also, flag to Strava any segments that are illegal.

    I have heard too many times that land managers are wondering how they received this gift that has fallen from the sky...
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    This is the first time I have heard anything specific when complaining about strava(with respect to trail access). I think the golden rule for strava haters is be as vague as possible because there is no evidence that strava has had a real impact on trail access. If I'm wrong here please let me know (with some specific examples)

    With this particular trail: I presume it was hiker only and was being poached by bikers who were using some prestrava software which alerted the land managers to the problem so they closed the trail for everyone?
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    If you dont mind me asking:

    Which trails were shut down because of strava?

    What do you think should be done about it?
    Quote Originally Posted by Axe View Post
    While I completely agree with the general premise of this thread... I have discovered a number of great trails by going over mtbguru when it was still functioning and Strava. I do not have other means to find out as I usually do not have time to hook up with the right people to show me.. Maybe some less public way of sharing some gpx tracks would be useful to me..
    Well the best way to find trails is to go out and ride trails a lot. Bring a map. Have a sense of adventure. Push you bike around. It is kind of fun.

    Another way is to know some local people. Show up at a trail day. Talk with these guys and offer up beers.

    Pimping out data to maximize your ride with the aid of atomic clocks floating in outer space? Seems kind of over complicated and super well not a nice word to me.

    I can offer up a mountain biker socialization class. It will be like kindergarten but with cooler toys: share, be nice don't spit on Johnny etc.

    The first lesson will be to read this email. Read it and weep Strava users.



    On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:55 AM, XXXXX wrote:


    HI XXXX, XXXX, XXXX

    Strava just came to our attention, through members of the environmental community. This is very disturbing and will surely have an adverse impact on any new trail development. Do you have any thoughts about how to approach this?

    XXXXX



    XXXXX
    XXXXX(job title)

    Marin County Parks
    3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 260
    San Rafael, CA 94903
    415 473 7010 T
    415 473 3795 F
    XXXXX@marincounty.org

    From:XXXXXX
    Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:43 AM
    To: XXXXX
    Cc: XXXXX
    Subject: FW: Strava

    See below. Looks like some of our trails are on Strava.



    XXXXXX
    XXXXX(job title)

    Marin County Parks
    3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 260
    San Rafael, CA 94903
    415 473 6391 T
    415 944 0552 M
    415 473 3795 F
    XXXXX@marincounty.org
    Marin County Parks

    Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

    I have so much vitriolic hatred for Strava but I'm keeping it on the down low. I will be a nice positive person about it but please don't pretend you are helping by mapping illegal trails and placing it on public domain. Even worse logging illegal activity on a public domain. Making all of your Strava segments that contain any of these things private should be a top priority for Strava users. I've never registered or owned an electronic doo dad for my bike. So I'm not even being hypocritical.

    If you do that then I will be friends with you and show you some sweet trails

  28. #28
    I just wanna go fast!
    Reputation: bdamschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    What a load of crap
    Not a load of crap. Strava isn't the problem, educating people to keep certain trails on the down low is.

    I could go out and map my ride with a gps and then upload it to google maps and share it publicly to anyone.

    I could use any number of other apps to map an illegal ride as well (runkeeper, google tracks, etc.)

    I could write a trail review on my blog, with directions on how to get there and pictures of sections so people know what to expect and post a link.

    I could go on mtbr.com and provide trail locations and pictures.

    We don't blame those other apps or mtbr or the internet or gps manufacturers.

    What stops me from doing all those things? Education from my fellow riders that it's not a socially acceptable thing to do.

    In the mean time if you want segments removed from strava, just flag them as hazardous. It only takes one person to do it and it'll get taken down.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    188
    This is a great thread. I have two examples to share:

    1. The head of Marin Open Space has actually said she uses Strava to monitor illicit activity. She also stated that it is proof that we are blatant poachers. This comes at a time that we are asking for increased access. Uhuh.

    2. We recently encountered "Mary the Hammer", one of the worst examples of idiots that segment poaches. We asked her why she does it and she said, "who cares, I'm leaving the country anyway". Nice.

    I've tried to have a dialogue with Strava too and gotten nowhere. I'd love it if this community could come up with a way to get through to them.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by bdamschen View Post

    In the mean time if you want segments removed from strava, just flag them as hazardous. It only takes one person to do it and it'll get taken down.
    I'm pretty sure it isn't this simple. In order to flag something as hazardous you first have to personally upload it as a segment you have done. So...this won't work.

  31. #31
    Axe
    Axe is online now
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,979
    Quote Originally Posted by vernonator View Post
    She also stated that it is proof that we are blatant poachers. This comes at a time that we are asking for increased access.
    Their utter lack of logical thinking never cease to amaze me. Yes, blatant poaching is a clear sign the we actually do need more access. Not the other way around.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KevXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by vernonator View Post
    This is a great thread. I have two examples to share:

    1. The head of Marin Open Space has actually said she uses Strava to monitor illicit activity. She also stated that it is proof that we are blatant poachers. This comes at a time that we are asking for increased access. Uhuh.

    2. We recently encountered "Mary the Hammer", one of the worst examples of idiots that segment poaches. We asked her why she does it and she said, "who cares, I'm leaving the country anyway". Nice.

    I've tried to have a dialogue with Strava too and gotten nowhere. I'd love it if this community could come up with a way to get through to them.
    1. Here is an example of someone that uses keywords and Google to keep tabs on mtn bikers.
    Stop breaking the law and please stop posting evidence you are breaking the law.
    Also, think about using "Craigslist Speak" 6-8-0 trail.
    Don't use first and last names of the anti-mtn bikers. It's like bread crumbs to the hot topics.
    Injured cyclist helicoptered to John Muir Medical Center - Marin Independent Journal

    2. In the off-road community, we have some knuckleheads that say, "What does it matter, this will all be closed down in a couple of years, so I'll do what the hell I want." Typically, these are the people that get areas shut down with bad behavior. Then they said, "I told you so." I"m at the point, I'd turn in a real selfish and destructive ahole to Mr Ranger.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KevXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    694
    If you go for a ride in the forest and no one can tell you were there, you still get to smile.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    607
    From what I understand Marin has had issues with trail access long before strava. I never said land manager were oblivious to strava, I'm thinking they are limited in what they can do about it. They can shoot emails back and fourth and mention it while remaining vague at meetings. Can they increase ranger patrols on illegal trails? Are they going to spend money to react to strava? In Marin they just might, but they probably don't need to.

  35. #35
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702
    I agree that if you're gonna ride less than legal trails, keep it to yourself. I don't agree that Strava is the source of this issue. The users not using Strava responsibly are the source.

    I'm not sure what all the Strava hate is about. I like Strava. I use it to keep tabs on my level of (lack of) fitness, and as a tool to push myself... mostly on how fast I can climb a tough section like Bishop's Walk or the paved climb at China Camp on the singlespeed.

  36. #36
    Paper or plastic?
    Reputation: zorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,730
    BTW, it's pretty easy to find out names if you leave the phone numbers in your post. Other than that, bike haters are looking for reasons not to give access. Poaching has been going on in Marin for about 30 years, pre Strava, pre GPS, pre full suspension bike, etc. Poaching will keep going on for as long as decent legal access doesn't exist.
    Faster is not always better, but it's always more fun

  37. #37
    more skier than biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Axe View Post
    Their utter lack of logical thinking never cease to amaze me. Yes, blatant poaching is a clear sign the we actually do need more access. Not the other way around.
    this.

  38. #38
    I'm really diggin it!
    Reputation: Davey Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Axe View Post
    While I completely agree with the general premise of this thread... I have discovered a number of great trails by going over mtbguru when it was still functioning and Strava. I do not have other means to find out as I usually do not have time to hook up with the right people to show me.. Maybe some less public way of sharing some gpx tracks would be useful to me..
    Quote Originally Posted by pimpbot View Post
    I agree that if you're gonna ride less than legal trails, keep it to yourself. I don't agree that Strava is the source of this issue. The users not using Strava responsibly are the source.

    I'm not sure what all the Strava hate is about. I like Strava. I use it to keep tabs on my level of (lack of) fitness, and as a tool to push myself... mostly on how fast I can climb a tough section like Bishop's Walk or the paved climb at China Camp on the singlespeed.
    Quote Originally Posted by zorg View Post
    BTW, it's pretty easy to find out names if you leave the phone numbers in your post. Other than that, bike haters are looking for reasons not to give access. Poaching has been going on in Marin for about 30 years, pre Strava, pre GPS, pre full suspension bike, etc. Poaching will keep going on for as long as decent legal access doesn't exist.
    I believe that the tread title was Stop Creating Strava Segments Non Sanctioned Trails. So please for the love of god stop doing that.

    Weather or not Strava existed before or after poaching existed is irrelevant. If the app was called DORKFACE we would ask you to stop DORKFACING the trails you are not supposed to know about or ride.

    Strava isn't wrong. It is fine as long as you don't record yourself doing something illegal. If you don't record yourself doing something illegal than no one has a public record of it happening.

  39. #39
    mtb'er
    Reputation: Empty_Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Davey Simon View Post
    From:XXXXXX
    Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:43 AM
    To: XXXXX
    Cc: XXXXX
    Subject: FW: Strava

    See below. Looks like some of our trails are on Strava.

    XXXXXX
    XXXXX(job title)

    Marin County Parks
    3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 260
    San Rafael, CA 94903
    415 473 6391 T
    415 944 0552 M
    415 473 3795 F
    XXXXX@marincounty.org
    Marin County Parks
    ^There's the key phrase: "our trails"... which is the mindset of trail users that simply don't want to share public resources with mt. bikers. These are the hikers and equestrians that will use any and all means to get in the ear of land managers to keep "their trails" illegal for bikes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe View Post
    Their utter lack of logical thinking never cease to amaze me. Yes, blatant poaching is a clear sign the we actually do need more access. Not the other way around.
    ^Ditto.

    Quote Originally Posted by zorg View Post
    ... bike haters are looking for reasons not to give access. Poaching has been going on in Marin for about 30 years, pre Strava, pre GPS, pre full suspension bike, etc. Poaching will keep going on for as long as decent legal access doesn't exist.
    ^Yes.

    As far as officially recognized trails go, Strava is not the problem. Trails weren't being opened to mt. bikes before Strava. Decriminalize mt. biking and the poaching issue becomes a non-issue.

    As far as "secret" trails go, I agree with the OP 100%. It only takes a couple of short sighted people and an internet connection to expose someone's hard work.

    I also venture to say that fewer XC oriented trails would be illegally built if bikers were allowed on existing hiking/horse trails that are already XC oriented. Jump/stunt trails are a different matter... but they've been getting built since the rise of BMX in the 70's... they've just gotten more sophisticated and bold.
    Last edited by Empty_Beer; 02-04-2013 at 03:05 PM.

  40. #40
    Paper or plastic?
    Reputation: zorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,730
    I agree that it's not a good idea, but I certainly don't agree that leaving a public trace of poaching is what's stopping legal access. That's a non sequitur.
    Faster is not always better, but it's always more fun

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Haus Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by derekbob View Post
    They can shoot emails back and fourth and mention it while remaining vague at meetings. Can they increase ranger patrols on illegal trails? Are they going to spend money to react to strava? In Marin they just might, but they probably don't need to.
    I wish this were true, but MMWD has the Marin County Sheriff on contract to patrol their lands on a regular basis. There has been a definite increase in patrols (vehicle and by foot) over the last year. I'm not saying that strava is the reason for this, but they're definitely using the data to their advantage. They're regularly patrolling the trails above the lakes. If you're ride over there often enough, you'll run into a sheriff or one of their parked trucks.


    What is more harmful to the water supply?

    Happy mountain bikers riding on singletrack

    or

    Large scale marijuana grows and all that great fertilizer, pesticide, and animal poison that ends up in in the groundwater?

  42. #42
    NedwannaB
    Reputation: JMac47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    9,780
    That may be what bdam is saying. Not that the "one" user who created "the" segment in question would do so. Plus sometimes there are more then one name for same segment which adds to the equation in completely removing it.
    Wait whuuut, who did he tell you that!?!?....

  43. #43
    mtb'er
    Reputation: Empty_Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Davey Simon View Post
    If you don't record yourself doing something illegal than no one has a public record of it happening.
    Tire tracks on a trail could be considered evidence of illegal activity happening.

    It just blows my mind that riding a bicycle on trails carved into Earth by man is a crime.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    165
    So has everyone given up on trying to get the rules changed and/or permission to build new trails?

  45. #45
    locked - time out
    Reputation: iheartbicycles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Czar Chasm View Post
    So has everyone given up on trying to get the rules changed and/or permission to build new trails?
    I'm thinking this thread is way off target. how many of us have created segments on strava for off limits trails? I'm thinking very few.

    I'd like to see an anonymous poll asking how many of us have created illegal trail segments on strava. Before we see the results, threads like this are just so much bluster.

  46. #46
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Empty_Beer View Post
    Tire tracks on a trail could be considered evidence of illegal activity happening.

    It just blows my mind that riding a bicycle on trails carved into Earth by man is a crime.
    could not agree more - 100% completely and totally ridiculous that any user thinks their way to recreate (in an environmentally and responsible fashion) is the only way.

    Unfortunately, as you are keenly aware, there is a highly vocal/shrill/maniacal group of (mostly) aging NIMBY's who desperately cling to the notion that nature is only to be traversed their way, or through a coffee table book.

    This ideological fallacy is coming to an end as an aging user group dies and a newer generation comes into play....a generation that knows the benefits of opening up the outdoors to share, enjoy and get healthy...

    The harder authorities try to come down the more resistance will be met - we are not a buncha teenage coffee shop workers....we are professional adults raising families who are making time to get organized and project a collective voice.

    Riding unsanctioned trails (responsibly/courteously), combined with the efforts of advocacy groups to legally gain more access is the way to go IMO - there is no way the old guard will ever budge if it is a single pronged approach....and their threats of taking away more access is old and tired..

    They have already taken too much, and given back virtually nothing....we have nothing to lose.


    yah, it's Monday and I'm ornery
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,494
    I have nothing constructive to add here.
    Nice KOM, sorry about your penis.

  48. #48
    Axe
    Axe is online now
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,979
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    They have already taken too much, and given back virtually nothing....we have nothing to lose.
    On a side note - Julien from BAAR alerted me today (Anybody up for a little adventure?) that some lands north of the bay are actively applying for a permanent bike ban. WTF is that sh.t. (I do not yet know details of where, as it will be part of an adventure training route.)

  49. #49
    locked - time out
    Reputation: iheartbicycles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,058
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    could not agree more - 100% completely and totally ridiculous that any user thinks their way to recreate (in an environmentally and responsible fashion) is the only way.

    Unfortunately, as you are keenly aware, there is a highly vocal/shrill/maniacal group of (mostly) aging NIMBY's who desperately cling to the notion that nature is only to be traversed their way, or through a coffee table book.

    This ideological fallacy is coming to an end as an aging user group dies and a newer generation comes into play....a generation that knows the benefits of opening up the outdoors to share, enjoy and get healthy...

    The harder authorities try to come down the more resistance will be met - we are not a buncha teenage coffee shop workers....we are professional adults raising families who are making time to get organized and project a collective voice.

    Riding unsanctioned trails (responsibly/courteously), combined with the efforts of advocacy groups to legally gain more access is the way to go IMO - there is no way the old guard will ever budge if it is a single pronged approach....and their threats of taking away more access is old and tired..

    They have already taken too much, and given back virtually nothing....we have nothing to lose.


    yah, it's Monday and I'm ornery
    I ran into a crazy old man at Shell Ridge the other day while waiting for a friend to show up. He starting ranting about how the ranger hates us and etc. He finally shut up when I told him I'm raising all my kids as mountain bikers. He understand at that point that his days were numbered. He mentioned something about it being a good sport and walked away.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,151
    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    I'm thinking this thread is way off target. how many of us have created segments on strava for off limits trails? I'm thinking very few.

    I'd like to see an anonymous poll asking how many of us have created illegal trail segments on strava. Before we see the results, threads like this are just so much bluster.
    All I know is that it just happened this weekend and it pisses me off. I took a shot at posting here in the small hope that whoever did it sees this and comes to their senses. You're probably right though...a very small percentage is the most likely scenario but a scenario none-the-less.
    I'm not sure how this works.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •