Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 139
  1. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: oakhills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    902
    I'm amazed by the amount of segments on Strava. Look at Manhatten, all those messengers creat segments for their "races".

    I get home from a spirited "trail run", and find all sorts of segments that are off limits to bikes. No, I don't ever ride my bike on these segments, only go for fast trail runs...

  2. #52
    NedwannaB
    Reputation: JMac47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    9,839
    A ride in a forest, and knowone will be in your way? That my friend would be a x2!
    Wait whuuut, who did he tell you that!?!?....

  3. #53
    It's about showing up.
    Reputation: Berkeley Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,731
    I don't see it as a tool, but as a facility.

    An analogy: any clown can get on a bike and do 35 mph but few can do it well without putting self or others in danger. You can't blame the bike, or its makers.

    The absolute rightness or wrongness of being on unsanctioned trails, in the view of many, depends upon what is seen as a reaction to an arbitrary philosophy of access, how that paradigm is regarded. What is being negotiated is the cost to the group as a whole.

    Strava provides a facility of focus for event efforts utilizing the the internet as a tool. Strava contrives a circumstance seeking only to tap into interest and gathering and publishing information. They profit by that interest and pay no price for its consequences. Must be nice.

    The responsibility we can express lies within the mtb culture and what you are reading in the thread is the culture's attempt to manage thoughtless riders. Note that thoughtlessness is not considered in terms transgressing an arbitrary rule but in the consequences to the greater mtb community, when we are revealed as over the boundary by those who don't want us around, or when we are engaged by those in authority.
    I don't rattle.

  4. #54
    I'm really diggin it!
    Reputation: Davey Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,368

    Stop creating strava segments on non-sanctioned trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Empty_Beer View Post
    Tire tracks on a trail could be considered evidence of illegal activity happening.

    It just blows my mind that riding a bicycle on trails carved into Earth by man is a crime.
    But you can't access that from your public bike hate station, uh I mean computer.

  5. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    could not agree more - 100% completely and totally ridiculous that any user thinks their way to recreate (in an environmentally and responsible fashion) is the only way.

    Unfortunately, as you are keenly aware, there is a highly vocal/shrill/maniacal group of (mostly) aging NIMBY's who desperately cling to the notion that nature is only to be traversed their way, or through a coffee table book.

    This ideological fallacy is coming to an end as an aging user group dies and a newer generation comes into play....a generation that knows the benefits of opening up the outdoors to share, enjoy and get healthy...

    The harder authorities try to come down the more resistance will be met - we are not a buncha teenage coffee shop workers....we are professional adults raising families who are making time to get organized and project a collective voice.

    Riding unsanctioned trails (responsibly/courteously), combined with the efforts of advocacy groups to legally gain more access is the way to go IMO - there is no way the old guard will ever budge if it is a single pronged approach....and their threats of taking away more access is old and tired..

    They have already taken too much, and given back virtually nothing....we have nothing to lose.


    yah, it's Monday and I'm ornery
    I agree to a certain extent but at the same time I fail to see how creating and recording activity on non-sanctioned trails can result in anything positive.

  6. #56
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Hungus View Post
    I agree to a certain extent but at the same time I fail to see how creating and recording activity on non-sanctioned trails can result in anything positive.
    It's a weird scenario fer sure.

    In my neck of the woods the 'volunteer trails' trails are used regularly and consistently (since '84) and State Parks is 'allowing' multi-use...

    Other rangers have inquired as how to stop people from accessing non-sanctioned trails - the only answer is to make them legal....they are beginning to realize that

    I was at a City Meeting about a system of proposed trails (hiking/trail running only for good reason) when Dave Sanguenetti* (sp) stated that the current use is all illegal, and the only way to stop the illegal use was to legalize...

    Once a trail system has been opened up activity becomes predictable and user groups tend to police each other...and illegal trail building subsides..

    To add when a system is utilized other illegal activities are diminished (homeless encampments/pot farms/etc)..and MTB'rs cover way more ground (kinda like passively patrolling). U-Conn is a prime example as well as the new Emma McCreary(sp) trail through Pogonip will prove to be.

    Now add that to how fast information travels currently...In the 90's it was basically word of mouth..

    In the 2000's you need $$ GPS equipment and some know how to share files/tracks...Currently all you need is a Smart Phone, a free App and a 5 years olds knowledge to distribute this info.

    Nothing is going to stem the flow of information....it is impossible to go back.

    Focus should be on responsible/environmentally friendly riding in a courteous manner.....Stepping off your bike for a hiker instead of passing from 12" away 5mph faster goes a long long way IME (as an example).

    this is all just my opinion...and it's not perfect by any stretch of the imagination.




    *Dave Sanguenetti is the Operations Manager for MipdPen....and a pretty nice guy.


    EDIT: I also realize this posting of rides/trails fundamentally kills the aspect of 'local' trails....it bugs me too, but I have no answers as how to stop it....info travels so freaking fast...
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  7. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by squashyo View Post
    OMFG. HK!!!!!!!!!! WTF!!!?

    Noboday cares that you can ride fast on a trail that's off the map. Please just don't do it.
    BTW, instead of/in addition to posting this on MTBR, you can comment on the person's ride in Strava. Let the person(s) know directly how you feel and ask them to remove it. Do it for everyone that's on the segment. If they don't, look up some of their other rides and see if you can find where they live (i.e. start rides from frequently), then go over and leave a flaming bag of dog doo on their doorstep

  8. #58
    I'm really diggin it!
    Reputation: Davey Simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,368

    Stop creating strava segments on non-sanctioned trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Czar Chasm View Post
    BTW, instead of/in addition to posting this on MTBR, you can comment on the person's ride in Strava. Let the person(s) know directly how you feel and ask them to remove it. Do it for everyone that's on the segment. If they don't, look up some of their other rides and see if you can find where they live (i.e. start rides from frequently), then go over and leave a flaming bag of dog doo on their doorstep
    Just wait until I get that trust fund!

  9. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: zgroove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    341

    Cool-blue Rhythm

    This is a great thread with awesome comments with the MTB community. I understand the initial beef of the Thread master in saying that it is a bonehead move to post an illegal trail on Strava. In comparison, I feel it is equal to the guy who would stick up a grocery store, video it, and then post it on YouTube. Don't complain if you get burned in the end! In this scenario, the community loses access to another trail. In retrospect, the community as a whole should understand that accessing these illegal trails does come with consequences either sooner or later for the whole MTB community. It is "cool" to ride only until you get either fined or hurt riding these trails, then its off to another destination. As a rider that frequents other countries where the term "free riding" takes a whole new meaning! Making your own lines and going whatever speed you want, at the same time not worrying about being tagged or fined for doing something that is out of the set rules. Bottom line, there is so much dirt to ride in this world, it is pointless to get your chonies in a bunch about an illegal trail on Strava. What goes around comes around for this bonehead Strava user! Ride on!

  10. #60
    Axe
    Axe is online now
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,019
    Quote Originally Posted by zgroove View Post
    In comparison, I feel it is equal to the guy who would stick up a grocery store, video it, and then post it on YouTube.
    It has probably happened by now. Probably more than once.

  11. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    301
    If its a secret trail that only a few know of, then it wouldn't be a loss to the greater mtb community, just those few that knew of it. Sounds like learning experience, hide your trails better and/or get riding buddies that you can trust. After all, if ain't on strava it will be posted or discussed somewhere else.

  12. #62
    graps the nettle
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    EDIT: I also realize this posting of rides/trails fundamentally kills the aspect of 'local' trails....it bugs me too, but I have no answers as how to stop it....info travels so freaking fast...
    chop down cell phone towers...
    hold my beer...

  13. #63
    ride all day
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    190

    Stop creating strava segments on non-sanctioned trails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Ya it's kinda sad what people do, Ya lets post us poaching a trail that's not open yet!!!

  14. #64
    It's about showing up.
    Reputation: Berkeley Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,731
    I relay a statement from an unamed national advocate:

    "The real problem is speed, not riding unsanctioned trails."
    I don't rattle.

  15. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,615
    Quote Originally Posted by Berkeley Mike View Post
    I relay a statement from an unamed national advocate:

    "The real problem is speed, not riding unsanctioned trails."

    ^^^^ This, Strava has really set the MTB bike community back a long ways, in fact its been a disaster for the hard work advocates working with land managers and being faced with tough questions and real data, it is hurting us, you folks can stick your heads in the sand if you want.

    Strava is no worse than any other GPS upload site though as far as unsanctioned trail use & discovery, maybe it's easier to digest and filter through than others but I really do not know since I have not tried it for this. Edit: Just went poking around and holy crap it is super easy to find trails.
    Last edited by TahoeBC; 02-05-2013 at 08:23 AM.
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  16. #66
    Wēk Ss
    Reputation: IAmHolland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,654
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    ^^^^ This, Strava has really set the MTB bike community back a long ways, in fact its been a disaster for the hard work advocates working with land managers and being faced with tough questions and real data, it is hurting us, you folks can stick your heads in the sand if you want.

    Strava is no worse than any other GPS upload site though as far as unsanctioned trail use & discovery, maybe it's easier to digest and filter through than others but I really do not know since I have not tried it for this. Edit: Just went poking around and holy crap it is super easy to find trails.
    flag the segment, it won't show up in "explore".

    Segments are auto created as well. i've been on a few rides where segments get made by itself. Usually 1/1 on the leaderboard, and sometimes it's GPS error going off into some weird areas at some ridiculous grade. 30+ % avg grade. I don't know where or how they get the names though.

  17. #67
    Old,slow,still havin fun.
    Reputation: fgiraffe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    943
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    ^^^^ This, Strava has really set the MTB bike community back a long ways, in fact its been a disaster for the hard work advocates working with land managers and being faced with tough questions and real data, it is hurting us, you folks can stick your heads in the sand if you want.
    Yes. Yes. No one ever went fast on trails before Strava. All radar use on trails started after Strava.

    What idiocy.

  18. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,615
    Quote Originally Posted by fgiraffe View Post
    Yes. Yes. No one ever went fast on trails before Strava. All radar use on trails started after Strava.

    What idiocy.
    Having all that speed data at your fingertips? for the people who collect data against us, Yes it is Idiocy, I fully agree!

    Our enemy's think Strava is the greatest thing since sliced bread, you kooks keep on feeding them that info
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  19. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    190
    mapping unsanctioned trails is a big no no IMO, racing on multiuse trails has the potential to have a really bad outcome some day.

    any actual cases of trails getting shut down or speed traps set up from strava?

    hey tahoebc, you should start mapping your secret bc ski lines.

  20. #70
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    Having all that speed data at your fingertips? for the people who collect data against us, Yes it is Idiocy...
    Quote Originally Posted by socobiker View Post
    mapping unsanctioned trails is a big no no IMO...
    Full on 100% agree - but can it be stopped? Posting here won't do much...we're preaching to the choir. That and you can't change stupid

    If not, how can we use it as a 'positive'? It definitely shows we need more trails. it also shows how much we are out riding (or a segment of us)...utilizing parks/trails/outdoors/etc...

    Maybe we need get some hiker only trails converted to MTB only. That would be MUCH easier than getting anything built for MTB use only....

    hmmmm....
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  21. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KevXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by Berkeley Mike View Post
    I relay a statement from an unamed national advocate:

    "The real problem is speed, not riding unsanctioned trails."
    In my opinion, it is both.
    "Look how fast I rode this route".
    "Look how fast I rode this route with illegal trails in the route."

    People need to grow up. "No atta-boys" on poached trails. Peer pressure is posting, "Delete this. You know why." Don't congratulate those hurting the sport and don't make it easy for the anti-mtn bikers to find. A friend just hit "10 ten" on a road route. I hope he doesn't kill himself trying to be #1.

    Any tool can be misused. I wonder what would happen if they left a radar trailer on 580 in Oakland.
    (Look at the side shows on 580 in Oakland. Spinning donuts on a freeway... crazy! Oakland Sideshows 2013 on highway 880 - YouTube)
    Name:  RadarTrailer176MPH.gif
Views: 1986
Size:  68.9 KB

  22. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,126
    Quote Originally Posted by fgiraffe View Post
    Yes. Yes. No one ever went fast on trails before Strava. All radar use on trails started after Strava.

    What idiocy.
    Way to miss the point.

  23. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CactusJackSlade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,459
    Strava, Garmin Connector any GPS uploading/sharing program makes it a lot easier for anyone to see what is really happening on the local trails.

    I would also say that one point I try to bring out in trail advocacy is that demographics of the trail users has changed significantly in the last 10-15 years.

    Yes, this data can be used to hurt MTB trail use efforts, but also on the flip side you can gather info showing the different user group use and the TRUE demographics of the trail users in the area. That being said I'm sure cyclists and runners are far more apt to use GPS devices and Strava than hikers and equestrians... but how hard is it to count a dozen horses a week...

    Personally I'd like to use these statistics to show that we need more open trails. The legal local trails are ridden and raced to death (Granite Bay) around here.

    There is a push locally by park rangers to crack down on illegal trail use.... and I'm sure Strava, Garmin Connect or whatever makes it easier for them to monitor trail activities.

    I'm not sure what the answer is, but I'm quite sure it's not going to go away anytime soon.
    Largest NorCal XC Race Series
    http://www.bicyclingevents.com
    Best in the West!

  24. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,615
    For the internet racing part of it, this is illegal to do this with motor vehicles for a good reason, it dangerous. Perhaps law makers can be lobbied to make this Strava feature illegal also. I do not know what going on with the lawsuit against Strava, but I hope they lose big time.
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  25. #75
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by KevXR View Post
    ..People need to grow up. "No atta-boys" on poached trails. Peer pressure is posting, "Delete this. You know why." Don't congratulate those hurting the sport and don't make it easy for the anti-mtn bikers to find. A friend just hit "10 ten" on a road route. I hope he doesn't kill himself trying to be #1.
    ...]
    Internet anonymity fundamentally kills the concept of responsibly conveying information (trails/speeds/etc in this case)....

    No one would openly discuss actively 'racing' on closed trails in front of LEO Rangers....but find it perfectly acceptable to do it from behind their keyboards/smartphones en masse...

    The sheer stupidity of this short sighted behavior is mind numbing....and it's not going to stop.

    We need to find a way to shed a positive light on all this track-able info....it's possible, just not easy.
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  26. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    Internet anonymity fundamentally kills the concept of responsibly conveying information (trails/speeds/etc in this case)....

    No one would openly discuss actively 'racing' on closed trails in front of LEO Rangers....but find it perfectly acceptable to do it from behind their keyboards/smartphones en masse...

    The sheer stupidity of this short sighted behavior is mind numbing....and it's not going to stop.

    We need to find a way to shed a positive light on all this track-able info....it's possible, just not easy.
    All I know is that almost every DH run in Santa Cruz is strava'd with leaderboards featuring many recognizable names both from the local bike industry and mtbr. Make what you will of that.

  27. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TahoeBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,615
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Hungus View Post
    All I know is that almost every DH run in Santa Cruz is strava'd with leaderboards featuring many recognizable names both from the local bike industry and mtbr. Make what you will of that.

    Yep, maybe a website with a wall of shame

    I'll even start
    Strava Segment | Soda Springs
    Last edited by TahoeBC; 02-05-2013 at 02:51 PM.
    Go get that KOM "You Deserve" - http://www.digitalepo.com/index.php

  28. #78
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Hungus View Post
    All I know is that almost every DH run in Santa Cruz is strava'd with leaderboards featuring many recognizable names both from the local bike industry and mtbr. Make what you will of that.

    I know...I was shocked when I did some looking into it..

    it's embarrassing to be honest...
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  29. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squashyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,314
    A very simple step would be to require your name gets posted as the person who created the segment. You are not going to do this if you know a **** storm will occur and a **** storm will occur if you segment a non-sanctioned local favorite...I can guarantee that!
    I'm not sure how this works.

  30. #80
    YESBRO!!!
    Reputation: datenschwanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,162
    I am just spitballing here, so it's not all going to be gold:

    Do you think that the reason every DH run in Santa Cruz is Strava'd with leader boards featuring many recognizable names from both the local bike industry and mtbr is that's because those are the people that ride those trails often?

    I'm just brainstorming...

    Edit to add follow up question: whose names were you expecting to see there? People from Indiana? Pennsylvania perhaps?

  31. #81
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by datenschwanz View Post
    I am just spitballing here, so it's not all going to be gold:

    Do you think that the reason every DH run in Santa Cruz is Strava'd with leader boards featuring many recognizable names from both the local bike industry and mtbr is that's because those are the people that ride those trails often?

    I'm just brainstorming...

    Edit to add follow up question: whose names were you expecting to see there? People from Indiana? Pennsylvania perhaps?
    I figured industry peeps and forum regulars would have a tad more common sense in the matter....
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  32. #82
    I like mtn biking, too
    Reputation: shredchic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,017
    I guess the same can be said for posting up legal rides where you exceed the posted speed limit? In which case, pretty much everyone here should take their stuff down.
    Half the planet is deep into bloody tribal mayhem. Were just riding bikes (and drinking beer) here.
    ~Fairfaxian

  33. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by datenschwanz View Post
    I am just spitballing here, so it's not all going to be gold:

    Do you think that the reason every DH run in Santa Cruz is Strava'd with leader boards featuring many recognizable names from both the local bike industry and mtbr is that's because those are the people that ride those trails often?

    I'm just brainstorming...
    Nice burn bro. Nice burn.

    To be honest with you, this whole issue, I'm over it. I used to care and I just don't any more. I *hope* strava doesn't lead to increased enforcement or trails being shut down, which I think it has the capability to, but this whole ship has sailed. The days of word of mouth and all that are over. If you want to build a super fun trail, I hope you have some acreage because eventually someone will find it and strava/youtube/mtbr it.

  34. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by datenschwanz View Post
    I am just spitballing here, so it's not all going to be gold:

    Do you think that the reason every DH run in Santa Cruz is Strava'd with leader boards featuring many recognizable names from both the local bike industry and mtbr is that's because those are the people that ride those trails often?

    I'm just brainstorming...

    Edit to add follow up question: whose names were you expecting to see there? People from Indiana? Pennsylvania perhaps?
    Nevermind.
    Last edited by Carl Hungus; 02-05-2013 at 03:15 PM.

  35. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation: exocetaaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeBC View Post
    For the internet racing part of it, this is illegal to do this with motor vehicles for a good reason, it dangerous. Perhaps law makers can be lobbied to make this Strava feature illegal also. I do not know what going on with the lawsuit against Strava, but I hope they lose big time.
    You sure sound like an angry fella, chill out! With or without strava there are alot of riders hitting illegal trails fast.
    I for one love strava. I love keeping track of my riding and climbing and yes am out gunning for KOMS on my local trails. If I see a hiker or another rider I will always slow down or get off if I have too that is all part of it.
    If you don't like strava don't use it.

  36. #86
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by exocetaaron View Post
    You sure sound like an angry fella, chill out! With or without strava there are alot of riders hitting illegal trails fast.
    I for one love strava. I love keeping track of my riding and climbing and yes am out gunning for KOMS on my local trails. If I see a hiker or another rider I will always slow down or get off if I have too that is all part of it.
    If you don't like strava don't use it.
    well sure - that's not in question.

    Keeping a searchable ongoing tally of use/speed/pinpoint locations is the problem.

    I don't think anyone's arguing that strava makes for an awesome training tool...it's just providing 'ammo' for anti-mtb folks when these 'volunteer' trails are posted over and over and over and over and over...

    We need to figure out how to disarm this info and use it in our favor...
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  37. #87
    I just wanna go fast!
    Reputation: bdamschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    We need to figure out how to disarm this info and use it in our favor...
    You can see how many people have ridden daily, monthly and yearly. Prove there has been little to no environmental impact for a set duration then take that data to prove that X number of riders are already riding said trail to show that there is no negative impact caused by the crowds. Done.

  38. #88
    default title
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    330
    The geek in me would love to have all the data be anonymously available in order to prioritize trails to legalize, MUT trails that should have chokepoints, single-use mtb trails that should have more armoring due to the traffic... big data used for the betterment of trail access and engineering rather than fighting human nature.
    "My opinions are often more offensive than my *******." - Twindaddy

  39. #89
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by bdamschen View Post
    You can see how many people have ridden daily, monthly and yearly. Prove there has been little to no environmental impact for a set duration then take that data to prove that X number of riders are already riding said trail to show that there is no negative impact caused by the crowds. Done.
    Quote Originally Posted by kattrap View Post
    The geek in me would love to have all the data be anonymously available in order to prioritize trails to legalize, MUT trails that should have chokepoints, single-use mtb trails that should have more armoring due to the traffic... big data used for the betterment of trail access and engineering rather than fighting human nature.
    bingo bango - finger meet nose.

    All the data...the months and years of traffic usage, lack of negative environmental impact, no user conflict, no biker/hiker collision, no biker on biker collisions, etc...etc... can all be used to shut down the NIMBY's and HOHA's

    Much of their argument carries little to no weight...the 'safety' and 'erosion' argument.

    Hell, if you can prove illicit activity in an area (pot farms/homeless camps/drug dealing/dumping trash) being mitigated by MTBr's riding a specific 'volunteer' trail that helps too...
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  40. #90
    I just wanna go fast!
    Reputation: bdamschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    bingo bango - finger meet nose.

    All the data...the months and years of traffic usage, lack of negative environmental impact, no user conflict, no biker/hiker collision, no biker on biker collisions, etc...etc... can all be used to shut down the NIMBY's and HOHA's

    Much of their argument carries little to no weight...the 'safety' and 'erosion' argument.

    Hell, if you can prove illicit activity in an area (pot farms/homeless camps/drug dealing/dumping trash) being mitigated by MTBr's riding a specific 'volunteer' trail that helps too...
    I wonder if Strava could be convinced to pony up that data with the anonymity included. I'm pretty sure if a club or group asked, they could compile a nice sheet with all the numbers you need while keeping individuals anonymous

  41. #91
    I like mtn biking, too
    Reputation: shredchic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,017

    There need to be more legal trails, dammit.

    I have never created a segment out of an unsanctioned or illegal trail on Strava, but I can see that they have been kicking for quite some time now. For some of us, if we leave our house on a bike, even just to go and do trail work on legal trails, it's a choice between riding unsanctioned trails, trespassing, or risking life and limb on suicide roads.

    I think one of the positive aspects of this is it shows a need. Perhaps it won't be seen that way by all land managers. I don't know. I guess we'll just wait and see what happens.
    Half the planet is deep into bloody tribal mayhem. Were just riding bikes (and drinking beer) here.
    ~Fairfaxian

  42. #92
    default title
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    bingo bango - finger meet nose.

    All the data...the months and years of traffic usage, lack of negative environmental impact, no user conflict, no biker/hiker collision, no biker on biker collisions, etc...etc... can all be used to shut down the NIMBY's and HOHA's

    Much of their argument carries little to no weight...the 'safety' and 'erosion' argument.

    Hell, if you can prove illicit activity in an area (pot farms/homeless camps/drug dealing/dumping trash) being mitigated by MTBr's riding a specific 'volunteer' trail that helps too...

    Sort of. What's publicly accessible in Strava is only a percentage of real use and gleaning data from a small data pool can give spotty results. Pulling from the backend database of all the large gps sites would be better (but probably against their privacy policies). No reported user conflicts or collisions is different than actual. And then there's the issue of one person's definition of conflict can be far from reality in either direction.

    If I'm riding or hiking a trail with obvious redwood feeder roots on the surface, there's erosion and environmental impact. You are well aware of the "habitat of species special concern" or some such designation of other trails with some major environmental issues.

    But YES - Closing off public access is the opposite of helping curb illicit activities.
    On the other hand, high use on trail might not stop off trail issues.
    Press-Banner - Scout cleans up old Henry Cowell grow

    You know, just ignore my rants. I think all this blue and gray color change of mtbr has made me b1tchy.
    "My opinions are often more offensive than my *******." - Twindaddy

  43. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AirKuhl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    47
    I like where this thread is going.

    I like Strava (when used responsibly) and it's ilk. Personally I prefer Sports-Tracker because I prefer the interface and have no need for leaderboards, but that's just me. My son races, he filters the Strava leaderboards on his race team and it gives him goals to shoot for. It works well as a training tool. And I can go out and ride some of his same trails when he's not around, so maybe when we go together I've had a chance to learn it and not be overly cautious and slow.

    This problem existed long before Strava as we all know, Strava just makes it that much easier to be an idiot. But since tech got us here, tech can get us out. Strava seems to just have 2 settings, fully private or full retard. Seems to me that creating a Facebook-like friends-only option would solve the problem pretty neatly. Sure, you'll still get d-bags that think that bragging about speed and secret trails makes them objects of worship, but as usual we can probably ridicule them into submission via public comments on the public segment posts.

    That one Strava tweak solves most of the problem, allows data sharing among friends and family, offers a way to publicly punch the clowns in the throat, and gathers data that can be used by the powers of good to legitimize MTB in all the right places.

    Like any tool, it's just a tool. It's all good until the user is also a tool.

  44. #94
    YESBRO!!!
    Reputation: datenschwanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,162
    No burn intended. Just asking who you expected to see there. The people in the industry are generally in it because they love riding bikes. They tend to be the ones that ride. Ditto for the people on this and every other local forum. If you go to the Michigan trails, I bet the people on the MTBR forum there are on the front page of the Strava listings for those trails too.

  45. #95
    VRC Illuminati
    Reputation: Rumpfy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,494
    Strava is always an interesting argument and I agree and understand most points on both sides of the fence.

    For the first time I'm seeing suggestions and ideas to use this controversial website for the betterment of MTB. Its nice to see.
    -eric-

    http://www.rumpfy.com
    Wanted: NDS Suntour XC Pro Microdrive 175mm Crank Arm.

  46. #96
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by kattrap View Post
    Sort of. What's publicly accessible in Strava is only a percentage of real use and gleaning data from a small data pool can give spotty results. Pulling from the backend database of all the large gps sites would be better (but probably against their privacy policies). No reported user conflicts or collisions is different than actual. And then there's the issue of one person's definition of conflict can be far from reality in either direction.

    If I'm riding or hiking a trail with obvious redwood feeder roots on the surface, there's erosion and environmental impact. You are well aware of the "habitat of species special concern" or some such designation of other trails with some major environmental issues.

    But YES - Closing off public access is the opposite of helping curb illicit activities.
    On the other hand, high use on trail might not stop off trail issues.
    Press-Banner - Scout cleans up old Henry Cowell grow

    You know, just ignore my rants. I think all this blue and gray color change of mtbr has made me b1tchy.
    not sure what exactly you're saying.

    the link to the article you posted...I have been, and will continue to work with that Ranger and other Rangers/Scientists in keeping that specific area open to MTB's....

    They welcome the use for all the cyclists/runners/hikers/shools that go out there to enjoy that area.

    In fact, that area has been used by cyclists since 1984 when people used to dump garbage there....it's only been part of HC for around 6 years....

    I have been on perimeter walks with Rangers there, assisted in organizing replacing vandalized signs....and to point out Ranger Brennan is aware that MTB' use out there keeps the pot farms small and the homeless camping infrequent...

    They are closing off an eroded area to re-contour and reseed - then it will be opened back up (years later).

    What's funny...is that Pot bust created a really nice trail (one of my favorites) there....it's currently closed now (bummer).

    The rest of the area is open to ride as there will be no enforcement outside of the eroded section (you know where I'm talking about)


    Here's a snap of my 3 year old - he rides to the trailhead with me and noodles around back there...



    This area is a good example of riding 'volunteer' trails and having it OK with authorities.....
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  47. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by datenschwanz View Post
    No burn intended. Just asking who you expected to see there. The people in the industry are generally in it because they love riding bikes. They tend to be the ones that ride. Ditto for the people on this and every other local forum. If you go to the Michigan trails, I bet the people on the MTBR forum there are on the front page of the Strava listings for those trails too.
    This forum in particular has had a policy of shutting down the open discussion of "non-sanctioned" trails for quite some time. Can any moderator explain to me the thinking behind this? Why would mtbr not want people discussing/sharing pictures/videos of non-sanctioned trails?

  48. #98
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Hungus View Post
    This forum in particular has had a policy of shutting down the open discussion of "non-sanctioned" trails for quite some time. Can any moderator explain to me the thinking behind this? Why would mtbr not want people discussing/sharing pictures/videos of non-sanctioned trails?
    the thinking is obvious - open discussion, posting video and locations of non-sanctioned trails bring unwanted traffic and attention.

    Also, promoting illegal activities on MTBR is a forum rule no-no.

    Now, what happens on Strava happens on Strava....I (we) have no say in that...
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  49. #99
    I just wanna go fast!
    Reputation: bdamschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Hungus View Post
    This forum in particular has had a policy of shutting down the open discussion of "non-sanctioned" trails for quite some time. Can any moderator explain to me the thinking behind this? Why would mtbr not want people discussing/sharing pictures/videos of non-sanctioned trails?
    Doesn't it basically boil down to sharing illegal activity? If you can be ticketed for it, then it's illegal. A commercial website can't promote illegal activity and expect it's sponsors to continue to support it.

  50. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Carl Hungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by CHUM View Post
    the thinking is obvious - open discussion, posting video and locations of non-sanctioned trails bring unwanted traffic and attention.

    Also, promoting illegal activities on MTBR is a forum rule no-no.

    Now, what happens on Strava happens on Strava....I (we) have no say in that...
    Exactly. So why is it done openly on Strava by those people who you would think are the most invested in this sport (the avid riders on this forum, those that work in the bike industry)?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •