Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Flow vs arch

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: napa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    88

    Flow vs arch

    Looking to build up some new wheels, should I go with stan's flow or arch's with white industries or hope hubs? They are for a 29er single speed I weigh 200lbs ride in auburn and Tahoe any suggestions would be helpful!

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,091
    Flow. I love wide rims after building a set of p35s. Traction and turning are off the charts.

    Both of those hubs are awesome.

  3. #3
    Cheesiest
    Reputation: intheways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    I'm about 185 and ride flows laced to hopes. It's a great setup.
    "Paved roads...just another example of needless government spending"—paraphrased from rhino_adv

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    526
    Definitely get Flow EXs.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,357
    Between those 2....Flows. You're borderline too heavy for arch's on that terrain, assuming you ride with any significant level of intensity. And, as Thickfog suggests, the handling characteristics of the wider rim are superior.

    Before you commit, also check out the WTB i23 rims. Its basically a flow rim, but lighter and with a true UST bead. WTB Frequency i23 AM wheelset: alternative to Flow rims

  6. #6
    HTFU!
    Reputation: S.O.B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    726
    FWIW I am ~ 185 and have been using the Arch EX rims with Hope Pro II hubs for the last year. While I do not 'bomb' downhills, I ride at an intermediate (usually 2x per week) on my SS and recently switched to Rigid. I ride over any and all terrain and have taken plenty of small jumps and bumps. Put maybe ~2000 miles on them and they have been solid. Never burped or rolled a tire and only flatted once with a Maxxis Ikon that I knew I should have changed out weeks before (nothing to do with the rim).
    I am more than pleased with the Arch rims and would definitely buy them again, but looks like I won't need to for a long while.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: X-FXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    678
    I was going to go with White Industries but needed the bike completed for a trip and ended up going with different hubs (Mavic). I regularly ride with two guys that have white hubs just hard to beat and made locally in Petaluma. The customer service when I was doing research was top notch…
    Quote Originally Posted by k1creeker View Post
    "yeah, she's fat, but you'd take her for a ride."

  8. #8
    NedwannaB
    Reputation: JMac47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,569

    Ditto!

    Quote Originally Posted by X-FXR View Post
    I was going to go with White Industries just hard to beat and made locally in Petaluma. The customer service when I was doing research was top notch…
    This^^^. I unwillingly sold a wheel with a geared WI hub ;(.
    CS is great. Have several FW's and an ecc one SS flip/flop hub for years.
    Last edited by JMac47; 12-28-2012 at 09:27 AM. Reason: typo
    Wait,who did he tell you that?....

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Brewtality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,438
    I am well over 200lbs and run the Arches for the last four years. This past summer the rear rim gave out after thousands of miles and dozens of races.
    The rear rim was replaced with an Arch EX using the original Hope hub.
    I like the Arches for their stiffness, strength and low weight. On an SS, lightweight wheels are crucial.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Its all Shits and Giggles until somebody Giggles and Shits

  10. #10
    Lightly salted
    Reputation: fuenstock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,218
    Im 190lbs ready to ride. I have around 700 miles on a set of arch ex rims on my geared 29er hardtail. I also have flows(not ex) on my 26" fs bike. I'm totally happy with the arch ex rims. I ride them on rougher trails as well as buffed single track with tons of elevation, no issues so far. If you do get arch rims just make sure they are the newer arch ex model. The arch ex is stronger and wider than the older arch rims.

  11. #11
    Team Chilidog!
    Reputation: Stripes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    7,244
    Loved the Arches on an XC bike. Great rim.
    Hated the Flows. I destroyed the rear one after less than a year on it (and the front was pretty beat up too), and this is was easy trail riding.

    Both are 26er wheels. I would get the Arches again, but not the Flows.

    My weight was 190 lbs on both wheels. I'm down to 175 lbs, but I still wouldn't try the Flows again.. maybe the Flows EX.

  12. #12
    my body breaks the falls
    Reputation: twindaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,227
    I've beat the sh!t outta my Flows on a rigid SS and no issues at all after 2000 miles on them. Similarly, flows on a Tallboy and now those are on a Yelli Screamy with over 2000 miles total. I'm a Hadley whore and can't change my hub preference, but recently took a leap of faith and had Chad at Red Barn build me a set of Crests w/Hadleys and figured they'd be pretzels in no time since I'm 190 pounds. 1500 miles later they're still true and round. Like others have said though - width is wonderful. Flows if you don't care about the extra 100 grams.
    $500 million for more irresponsible EBRPD land management? No thanks.
    www.noonmeasureww.org

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •