Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    MBA
    MBA is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    31

    Avid Mech. 160mm or 185mm for Aggresive XC?

    Should I just go with 160mm rotors, or 185's for claimed 15% more power?

    Avid Mech. 160mm or 185mm for Aggresive XC?

  2. #2
    Do It Yourself
    Reputation: Homebrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,722

    Depends...

    How heavy are you? Do you ride extended downhills? Prefer more "stopping power" or more modulation?

    A lot of people run 185 up front and 160 in the rear. This puts the power where you need it and give a good balance.
    Long Live Long Rides

  3. #3
    MBA
    MBA is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    31

    Probably modulation over brute power

    I'm 175lbs, ride in San Diego with not too long of downhills, and prefer modulation over "brute" power.

    I think I'll try the 160s front and rear. I understand that for $30-$35 I can always put a 185 up front and experiment.

  4. #4
    Bad Case of the Mondays
    Reputation: Jdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by MBA
    I understand that for $30-$35 I can always put a 185 up front and experiment.
    Probably more like $50 unless you've got a good hookup. You need the bigger rotor (about $40 new) and an adaptor to run a bigger rotor (about $10).

    FWIW, I am 195lbs and I ran 160s Front and Rear in Oklahoma with no need for more power at all. However, since moving to CO I've switched to 185 F&R as the 160s weren't cutting it on the long downhill runs.
    Last edited by Jdub; 04-20-2005 at 09:10 AM.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbykr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    445

    hey

    go with the 185 for starters------unless you don't a lot of downhill runs ( ie midwest) you will be much happier with the 185 up front and 160 rear. Good Luck!
    [SIZE="3"]The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' --Ronald Reagan [/SIZE]

  6. #6
    contains quinine
    Reputation: Debaser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,586
    I'm runing the itty bitty rotors front and rear on my 29'er in Colorado. Been fine thusfar.
    Take the long cut, we'll get there eventually.

  7. #7
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,666
    I agree with Jdub.

    I ride at the sorroundings of Mexico City where each and every trail make you spend a lot of time climbing just to gift you with long descents.

    When using my 160 F/R mechs, the rear got some overheating (aparently I was not sending enough cooling air to the rear) and I wished for either a more powerful front to ligthen up the workload of my rear brake or a full 185 F/R setup.

    I'm 150 (in riding order) btw, not heavy precisely.

    At singletrack speeds and normal climbing/descending conditions, the 160 are enough to send you OTB in any situation, but on long, long descents, you'll like a bigger rotor to get some heat off.

    Another option is to run Koolstop's or Galfer's pads. Those are semi-metallic (a la Hayes/Shimano/Magura) and do not generate as much heat.

    Go for the simple approach. Switch pad compound, if it does not work go for bigger rotor front and if that is not even enough (?? - Avids are all about usable power) go for both bigger rotors.
    Check my Site

  8. #8
    Bad Case of the Mondays
    Reputation: Jdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by Debaser
    I'm runing the itty bitty rotors front and rear on my 29'er in Colorado. Been fine thusfar.
    You must not have picked up as many winter pounds as me then....

    See you at Hall tonight?

  9. #9
    contains quinine
    Reputation: Debaser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Jdub
    You must not have picked up as many winter pounds as me then....
    Not likely... Long winter, many beers...

    I'll be at the shop at 6. With itty bitty braked bike in tow.
    Take the long cut, we'll get there eventually.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    83
    my advice is go for hydraulics, they'll give you more power allo around and a much better feel.

  11. #11
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    47,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacques12345
    my advice is go for hydraulics, they'll give you more power allo around and a much better feel.
    Or not. Not everyone likes the feel of hydraulic brakes. Some do not like the feel of cable brakes.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  12. #12
    Bike Whore
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    989
    I prefer my cable feel over the hydraulic feel.

  13. #13
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,390
    Quote Originally Posted by MBA
    Should I just go with 160mm rotors, or 185's for claimed 15% more power?

    Avid Mech. 160mm or 185mm for Aggresive XC?

    another vote for the 185/160 front/rear combo. just do that right from the start. i certainly didn't need the 185, but going to it fromt he 160 was veeeeery nice. i'd not go back to the 160 for any reason i can think of. more power, great modulation.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  14. #14
    Fremen
    Reputation: rob68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    150
    -I weigh 175 also & the 160's provide all the power & modulation I could want. I also run Avid sd-7's which also helps modulation.
    [size=2]*Riding without internal combustion since 1991*[/size]

  15. #15
    Freshly Fujified
    Reputation: Call_me_Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    8,200

    185 f & r for me

    I go 230 and want all the confidence in stopping power I can get. I also got a steal on the set including SD 7 levers for $160.00. Given that the vendor was selling 160, 185 or 205 sets w/levers at the same price, the decision was very easy for me.

    Clyde
    'If Wal-Mart sold parachutes, who would jump?' Frank Havnoonian (quoting his father) Drexel Hill Cyclery

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: col200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    268
    Not trying to sound dumb, but does the brake lever make a big difference in the stopping power? I've been thinking about switching out my LX levels for some Avid SD only because I have a little vertical play in the lever.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Festusjrf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    314

    The lever does make a diffrence

    The speed dial lets you adjust the lever ratio. I found that the cable is very important when you use a mecanical brake. The avid flack jacket feels better to me than the Jagwire, i did not think the cable would matter that much. I run avid mechs 185 front and 160 rear, I found the front to be great on fast downhills but a bit grabby on slow technical stuff. I just got my juicy seven and will put them on soon they too are 185 160 I am looking for a better brake feel.

Similar Threads

  1. Avid Mechs 160mm vs 165mm vs 185mm vs 203mm??
    By BikeKilla in forum Brake Time
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-17-2004, 06:02 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2004, 08:30 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-10-2004, 09:48 PM
  4. Levers for Avid Mech and XC riding?
    By Edderd in forum Brake Time
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-02-2004, 01:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •