Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    21

    Cotic Sould, Sanderson Life, Rock Lobster SIZING confusion

    Hi there,
    I'm in the market for a nice steel XC hardtail to run with a 100mm fork (Manitou R7 MRD that I already have).
    Some research and my shortlist (in order) is:
    1. Sanderson Life
    2. Cotic Soul
    3. Rock Lobster 853 (probably best value).

    The advice I seek is mostly around sizing.
    I'm 1.77 or marginally under 5'10" with a 32.7" inseam. Coming from the road and then fully rigid MTB, I might have a little preference for long and low in the front.

    The Soul would be easy: 17.5" medium recommended for 5'8 to 6'1. Effective TT 59 cm (23.25"). Cool. I'd try that with a 90mm stem.

    The Life is confusing (how true). The smallest (16") still has a 61.2 cm (24.1") effective TT!!! That could be just great. Long and low But I'm scared I make a mistake because 16 just doesn't sound right...? The 18" Life has a 62.5 cm eff TTand really starts to sound too long then.

    The Loster is the opposite. The 17" only has a 57.8 cm (22.75) eff TT. The 19" is not much longer (0.25") and I already fear standover issues (32" standover with 32.7" inseam).

    So, the Soul sounds like 'no risk' in terms of the available size and geometry. The Life is different, could be better, but '16' just doesn't sound like my size.

    What do you guys think? 16" Life, 18" Life, or 17.5" Soul?
    Writing this I think the Lobster is off the short list...

    BTW, any other contenders that I should consider? I won't warm up to a steel frame much heavier than those three (just under or spot on 2kg).

    Cheers,
    Guidog

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: crank1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,560
    I owned a Sanderson Life in the 16" size for a short time. I'm 172cm tall and with a 90mm stem and 100mm Rebas found it to be a very nice bike. Design, construction and finish quality of the frame was excellent.

    Looking at your 3 options though I'd probably go for the Cotic Soul. It looks as well built as the Sanderson but I would like a slightly shorter top tube.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by crank1979@optusnet.com.au View Post
    I owned a Sanderson Life in the 16" size for a short time. I'm 172cm tall and with a 90mm stem and 100mm Rebas found it to be a very nice bike. Design, construction and finish quality of the frame was excellent.

    Looking at your 3 options though I'd probably go for the Cotic Soul. It looks as well built as the Sanderson but I would like a slightly shorter top tube.
    Yes, I think the 18" Life is probably too long.

    So it's really between the 16" Life and the 17.5" Soul.

    I've seen posts here and elsewhere from people 5'11" or more being happy with the 18" Life and from people a bit smaller than me to be happy with the 16" Life. Anyone out there close to 177 (5'10) on a Life, 16 or 18, and what's the experience?

    Can a bike be 'too small' if it's not too short?

Similar Threads

  1. Rock Lobster?
    By Bar01 in forum Vintage, Retro, Classic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 10:18 AM
  2. Rock Lobster
    By Bar01 in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 07:20 AM
  3. Rock Lobster WTF
    By SC RockLobster in forum 27.5 - 650b
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-09-2009, 06:36 PM
  4. The Rock Lobster
    By ernesto_from_Wisconsin in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-31-2006, 03:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •