Cannondale Trail vs Trail SL frames
I didn't find out anything in the Cannondale subforum, so I hope it's okay to post here.
Basically, I've been looking all over trying to figure out how exactly these frames (Cannondale Trail and Trail SL) differ and all I can see is that the head tube diameter is different. Are there any other structural differences between the two, anything significant? Or does it all come down to the fact that you cannot fit a Fatty fork onto a regular Trail frame?
Also, if anyone has any info regarding the specific weights of these frames, that would be super useful too!
What I can see is that the trail only has 2 levels 5 and 6. Then as you go up in spec they have the trail SL 4,3,2,and 1.
The geo is a tad different on the SL but probably not very noticeable. Like you said, 1.5 vs 1 1/8 headtube.
I dont have a frame weight but the full bike weight is about 30 lbs give or take depending on size and model.
2008 Redline Monocog 29er SS/Rigid
2013 Marin Mount Vision XM7
FS: 26" Black Flag Expert Wheelset (new), Reba 29 Fork
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
The Trail does not have a 1.5" headtube while the Trail SL does. The SL is a lighter frame and uses the Cannondale SAVE technology. Other than that, the SL just has higher end components than the normal Trail line.
Big Wheels Keep On Rolling
By discohospital in forum Cannondale
Last Post: 07-17-2013, 09:42 AM
By sonic reducer in forum All Mountain
Last Post: 06-28-2013, 01:58 PM
By k_singh in forum Beginner's Corner
Last Post: 08-25-2012, 12:41 AM
By idon'tlikepink in forum Beginner's Corner
Last Post: 08-22-2012, 07:56 AM
By rjc003 in forum Beginner's Corner
Last Post: 07-09-2012, 05:44 AM