Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WrenchP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013

    New question here. Bike fitment preference

    Hey all,

    I just sold an old car project of mine to get some mountain bikes. I ended up picking up a Treck 3700 19.5" frame and a Treck Wahoo 15.5" frame for $400 for the pair. I think I did okay on the price.

    Anyway, I am 6'2" and have been riding the 3700 on the street for a little. I have made some changes to the seat position and that and we put an older WTB confort seat on the Wahoo for my wife. I went ahead and took the Wahoo seat post all the way to the marks and went and rode it around a little and it felt fine as far as fit.

    My question is, What is your preference? Would you rather have more room to move your seat down and out of the way, or have the frame that more matches your height?

    the reason I ask is that I have seen a lot of bikes that have the saddle adjusted way high. It has made me think there is some advantages to being able to adjust the saddle down and out of the way.

  2. #2
    Fat-tired Roadie
    Reputation: AndrwSwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    I'd rather have a bike with the right wheelbase for my height. Everything else is secondary.

    Mountain bike frames have compact geometry. The old designs had a horizontal top tube. A sloping top tube exposes more seat post, but saddle position is still about the rider. Most people seem happiest riding road, XC, or at least climbing on flat bar bikes with the saddle roughly level with the bars. More XC-oriented riders tend to put the bars a little lower and more DH-oriented riders tend to put the saddle a lot lower. Freeride, AM and dirt jump types do too.

    I set my saddle for good leg extension and forget it. My newest bike doesn't even have a quick release on the seat tube collar. I usually spend more time figuring out where to land my handle bars. Aside from the convenience of being able to straddle my bike, I don't really benefit from having a compact top tube, but if I spent more time on pump tracks, I'd want to be able to drop the saddle way down. So there's a real advantage to being able to do that.
    "Don't buy upgrades; ride up grades." -Eddy Merckx

  3. #3
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrwSwitch View Post
    Mountain bike frames have compact geometry... A sloping top tube exposes more seat post,
    Exactly. It's pretty typical for mtn bike that fits a rider properly to be showing quite a bit of seatpost.

Similar Threads

  1. XL 26'er Bike fitment w/pics
    By adrianm1188 in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-23-2013, 09:02 PM
  2. Help with bike fitment
    By TonyB. in forum Virginia, WV, Maryland, DC, Delaware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-06-2013, 02:41 PM
  3. Chain Preference...
    By dirtdan in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 01:36 PM
  4. VT 50 and Hampshire 100 ? about 29'r bike preference...
    By RPG in forum Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-18-2011, 08:16 PM
  5. Helmet preference
    By mjcort27 in forum Utah
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-26-2011, 08:51 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.