Page 3 of 49 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 2444

Thread: 2013 Spitfire

  1. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    44/56 for the spitfire V2
    That is wonderful news

  2. #102
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,271
    Quote Originally Posted by cave dweller View Post
    If you want to run a single front chain ring, what is the smallest size you can run without getting kickback similar to V1 models?
    I can't speak for the spitfire, but my KS-link prime has no detectable pedal feedback with a 30t single ring... also doesn't have that buttery rearward travel feeling that my old rune has.

    Maybe Keith can chime in, but my guess is that the KS link bikes have less of a rearward axle-path, compared to the old bikes, so pedal feedback won't be much of an issue.

  3. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    It doesn't really work like that, it is a gradual scale. The smaller the chainring you use on any bike with chain stretch the more pedal kickback you will get (it's to do with the radius of the chainring). That said the pedal kickback is reduced about 40% on the spitfre V2 for any given chainring size, so you will feel less kickback for chosen chainring size. If you want an optimal chainring size for 100% antisquat the best range would be 32-34.
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  4. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    If you want an optimal chainring size for 100% antisquat the best range would be 32-34.
    Which will be the optimal chainring size for Prime and Rune?

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    410
    Quote Originally Posted by walt06 View Post
    Which will be the optimal chainring size for Prime and Rune?
    Oh +1 for this question!

  6. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Prime optimal range is probably 28-32.

    Rune V2 optimal range is 32-36.

    But both depend on what pedaling characteristics you want, some may like smaller chainrings (more antisquat) and others larger (less pedal kickback).
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  7. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    24
    Ok, on my Spitfire V1 I found that it works best with 36t, but when I switched to 1x10 I had to take a 32t ring because 36 is to heavy to pedal. With the 32t I have noticeable pedal bob, but it's just acceptable.
    I'm now thinking about the drivetrain for my new Prime. I would like to go single ring on it too, but would need to take a uncommon (cranks?) 30t ring for same gear ratio than on my Spitfire.

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    There are 30 toot chairing options that fit on normal tripple chainring crank setup, if you read through some of the prime build threads I'm sure you will find the name, they seem to work well and offer. All new bikes have less pedal kickback (for a set chainring size) then the old frames, with prime being the least of them due to larger wheel size requiring a smaller chainring.
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  9. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    590

  10. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Quote Originally Posted by MalcolmX View Post
    Gotta love it when a communicaty shares their knowledge! Thanks MalcolmX
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  11. #111
    G_g
    G_g is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    143
    There is also one ring from extralite, but that one doesn't allow you to use some chain guides. (with 104 bcd)

    Also, take a look at the Sram cranks with removable spider. Some of them come with 29t rings, or you could just get the MRP bling ring.

    On top of those, there are 30t rings that mount on the granny spot of normal cranks (sjscycles, but there should be more). In this case, you should make the granny be inline with the middle ring, so some shaving of granny tabs is required (get an older crank set, just to give it a try. I got a used Deore hollowtech 2 for very cheap, and there were loads of truvativ holzefeller and similar cranks very cheap, that can withstand grinding the granny tabs easily)

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    181

    New question here.

    If your interested, here the Spitfire V2 geometry.



    Have somebody an idea about the weight of the frame ?

  13. #113
    FM
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,271
    Interesting that the 650b spitfire and a 29" prime have about the same wheelbase - the prime is even a little shorter @ 45.4

    (comparing mediums)

  14. #114
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    In the german mtb-rider-magazine is an Article about Wheelsize. Gravity-orientated riders comparing 26, 27,5 and 29er in various different Terrain. Testbikes were all Nicolai ACs. Funny thing was: Lots Geometry-Specs such as Wheelbase, BB-height, Bar-height, Saddle-Position and so on, were closely beeing similar through all sizes. Only Angles of ST, HA or Chainstaylength were different. So all Testriders, just by sitting on the Bikes, did not feel any difference - just the way how the Bike rode did that

  15. #115
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    410
    Quote Originally Posted by NoStyle View Post
    In the german mtb-rider-magazine is an Article about Wheelsize. Gravity-orientated riders comparing 26, 27,5 and 29er in various different Terrain. Testbikes were all Nicolai ACs. Funny thing was: Lots Geometry-Specs such as Wheelbase, BB-height, Bar-height, Saddle-Position and so on, were closely beeing similar through all sizes. Only Angles of ST, HA or Chainstaylength were different. So all Testriders, just by sitting on the Bikes, did not feel any difference - just the way how the Bike rode did that
    Sounds like an interesting article. What conclusion did most of them come to in regards to what size they liked?

  16. #116
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Quote Originally Posted by Mishtar View Post
    Sounds like an interesting article. What conclusion did most of them come to in regards to what size they liked?
    Yes indeed, the article was really interesting to read, as all Testers were true to 26 but tried to be as open minded as possible, haven´t ridden 29ers before, or were sceptical to the "new" 650B Size.
    I will give a more detailed conclusion from this Test during the Weekend ...

  17. #117
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,938
    Yes, but remember that the Spitfire has 4 sizes that aren't as spaced apart as the Prime's 3, so the TT on the M Prime is 22.8", while on the M Spitfire it's 23.2", then take the couple degrees slacker HA and no surprise, but 26er die hards will still argue a 29er just can't handle the same.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM View Post
    Interesting that the 650b spitfire and a 29" prime have about the same wheelbase - the prime is even a little shorter @ 45.4

    (comparing mediums)
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??
    MTB Barbados
    My Phantom pics

  18. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kalkhoffpink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    147
    I read the article too, and I am not sure if everything was totally unbiased in respect to the bike company who delivered the test bikes.
    The 29" was claimed to be a liitle bit better and more comfortable on the uphills, but not that controllable.
    On the downhill surprisingly all bikes where at the same speed overall. The times from the test-track were nearly identical.
    So all in all the 650B is the golden middle and it depends on what you do with the bike…blablabla....nothing really new…

    In another test in a german magazine the Norco Killer B was rated worse than the 26" model.

  19. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,167
    Builttoride,

    Any way you can get a new 650B Spitfire down to Francois @ MTBR for the 650B bike shootout he's about to do? Even if it wasn't a full production model it would be nice to see the Banshee included with a disclaimer to test a production version later. So...what do you think???
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  20. #120
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    ... Yes reach has increased for the spitfire V2 for all sizes.

    The large Spitfire V2 has a reach of 452mm (22mm longer than old one), this is to move towards rider running slightly shorter stems and having a more aggressive riding position.

    The Effective top tube has remained the same but this number is a little misleading, as the higher you put the saddle the longer the top tube will feel as the actual seat post angle is slacker than the old frame due to bend in seat tube. So you will find that if you stick with a large frame, and switch to a 50mm stem, the the bikes geometry will feel very similar to your current bike.
    Dear Keith,

    do you have any correct/concrete measurements due to this "growing" effective Toptube? How much more does it eventually strech-out in high Saddleposition?

    The reason why I ask:
    I am 184 cm tall, inseam is about 86-87 cm and I´m always torn between the Sizes Medium and Large. Usually I feel totally at home on M when it comes to technical Riding and deal with the shorter Toptubelength for ideal Pedalling. I would like to have a slightly longer Toptube towards L for more Trailriding in the Future, but want to have the maximum Seatpostlength of M. Coming from a M Wildcard and comparing Geometry to a M Spitfire I immediately decided on Size M again, but I am a bit unsure if a large Spitfire will be a better fit, knowing that a 47 cm Seattube with raised Toptube is too high for my liking.

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Easiest way to think abut this is tha roughly for every 15mm the saddle is above the ETT line (horizontal to top dead center of headtube) the cockpit feel will increase by about 1mm over the ETT. There are a lot of bikes out there that are like this, but the manufacturers don't mention it.

    Nostyle, it sounds like a medium would be best fit for you probably, but only you can decide for sure.
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  22. #122
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    Easiest way to think abut this is tha roughly for every 15mm the saddle is above the ETT line (horizontal to top dead center of headtube) the cockpit feel will increase by about 1mm over the ETT. There are a lot of bikes out there that are like this, but the manufacturers don't mention it.

    Nostyle, it sounds like a medium would be best fit for you probably, but only you can decide for sure.
    Thank you Keith!
    I think for me this is a very welcome Feature, as the effective Toptube will be around 595 mm, maybe a tad more when sitting high on the Saddle. That is close to my "Dream-Toptube-Length" of 600 - 605 mm. I will stick to the Medium now, as the Spitfire is already longer (+ 18 mm Reach) than the M Wildcard and a Wheelbase of 118 cm (26") / 119 cm (650B) seems pretty long for me. Plus having the most possible Standover-Hight for steep and technical Terrain - sounds pretty good for a Bike that is going to be ridden everywhere!

    Many Greetings from Cologne, Germany
    NoStyle

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    30
    builttoride, that's probably not your responsibility, but when the final prices and order (or pre-order) options on new spit/rune shall be released?
    our local dealer in Russia just says that Banshee ignores his questions on that topic, and the community is going to rage on that
    Could you please update with latest info? please PM if it's not a public information.
    thanks!

  24. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    PM sent
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  25. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    24
    Keith,

    Have you had a chance to ride the spitty or rune with 650B wheels? How does it feel compared to 26"? I'm VERY interested in trying 650B, and the fact that the spitty has the option is awesome. Any feed back from you or some of the other prototype testers would be appreciated.

    Cheers,
    Chris

  26. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Hey Chris, we have some professional reviews in the pipeline that will be reviewing the bikes in both 26" and 650B, and hopefully at least one comparing wheel sizes on the bike with everything else equal.

    My opinion of 650B is that it again comes down to personal preferance with same pros and cons of any wheel size. I can see 650B becoming a popular option for trail / all mountain riders once component options catch up.

    Selecting wheel size really is about optimal compromise.
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  27. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,167

    Little freaked out on the wheelbase

    Gotta say this new bike looks great and the KS link seems to be the real deal in performance and I can use my 650 wheels . While most seem to like the low/slack setting option I would most likely use the high/steep setting for New England tight rocky conditions. I want a bike I can pedal through rock gardens without constant hits, and climb up and over the technical rock and root infested trails we have here. That's the most important to me. Descending is really the least of my concerns and I already know this bike is more than capable and well, gravity will get you there one way or another.

    So (based on a large frame) the wheel base on this thing is looooong. Longer than most 29'ers 2.1" longer than my current 2011 Jamis Dakar 650. 2.4" longer than a Mojo HD 140, and 1-1.5" longer than almost any other 650B bike that's available (or will be). Only the new Scott is close @ .1" shorter.

    Can this bike be nimble, agile, lively and work in my conditions or is it just gonna feel like a sled that's always waiting to go down hill and fight me on the gnarly climbs? 30+ years of dirt bikes I know a long WB can help with climbing and keep the front end down. Perhaps the Spitty would be this way? But at the expense of agility and liveliness?

    I think I get the reach/stack thing and I would use a 50-60mm stem from my current 75mm.

    Me I'm 6' exact with 34.5" inseam so I assume a large like my current bike. Also I hate tons of seat post showing (current is 9.5") which a medium would force me to do. Below you can see how different the bikes are so why I'm somewhat apprehensive. This is a size Large with 650B wheels.

    Jamis Dakar -------------- Spitty
    Stack 23.5--------------------23.2
    Reach 17.125----------------17.8
    Top Tube 23.7---------------24.2
    Stem 75mm-------------------50-60mm (I assume to match Jamis reach?)
    WB 44.76--------------------- 46.8
    HA 69----------------------------67, 66.5, 66
    Head tube 5.5-----------------4.5
    Spacers 20mm---------------???
    SA 73 degrees---------------74.5, 74, 73.5 ESA
    Seat post 18------------------18.5
    BB height 13.4 (bad)------13.9, 13.65, 13.4
    CSL 17.7------------------------17.2, 17.3, 17.4

    Thoughts and input please and getting a demo ride is most likely not remotely possible with no dealers anywhere close.
    Last edited by skidad; 11-18-2012 at 09:09 AM.
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  28. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    183
    I've owned the V1 spitfire for 2.5 years and have ridden it long and hard. It is setup primarily for XC due to the type of terrain for my locale. It is about 25-26 lbs. The geo is great as an all around bike. While the HA is slackened which helps the descent, it does slightly hinder the climbs. The SA is steepened and this helps to put you into a more forward climbing position while seated during climbs. So the SA in my opinion helps factor out the slack HA for climbs.
    One of my biggest complaints about the bike is it is kind of a dead fish in terms of liveliness. Manuals are near impossible. The front end does not like to be off the ground. "Popping off" jumps is impossible.You can feel the length of the wheelbase in air and it feels flexed with no stabilization. With forks less than 140mm the BB height causes some pedal strikes. Not much for me because I'm running 165mm length crank arms, but I would like to go longer in crankarm length since I do a lot of pedaling. The BB height does help in terms of cornering and getting low to the ground and hugging the turns is what it likes to do. As does any bike with a BB height <13.5".
    The spitfire is essentially a sled that likes to carve the trails. It performs great when on the ground but agile and liveliness is lacking. I would hate to try the spitfire at a park with any jumps or doubles with gaps. It flexes so terribly. I am suffering from framewear in the rear triangle, mind you.
    The new spitfire will have a shorter chainstay, but longer top tube I believe. It will be interesting to see if the this changes the maneuverability. I think the long wheelbase is killing any agility the bike could have otherwise. It would be nice to have some way to further shorten the chainstay length thereby shortening the wheelbase as well.
    Did the wheelbase on the V2 get shorter, longer or stay the same? I haven't perused the numbers, but on the website and forums there are several different versions and I'm not sure which one is V1 and what's V2 measurements.
    Will the V2 have the frame adjustablity at the shock? The steep setting is a very odd geo once you have used it in the slack setting.
    If Banshee could make a Spitfire that rides like the rampant, but with longer travel then they would rule the market. That bike is radness. i only wish it had a little more travel and a 142x12mm TA.

  29. #129
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Here is the Geometry of the V2 Spitfire again:



    In my opinion every Bike with this "new-school-geo" do have (much) longer Wheelbase - that comes from the Fact that Seatangles are getting steeper, slightly longer Toptubes (for shorter Stems and wider Bars) and therefor longer Reach. Slacker Headangles too, but mostly shorter Chainstays as previous Models.
    This gives you a more "foreward-Position" on the Bike - in my opinion a great benefit for both Climbing and Descending. So hiawatha-de, all of what you have requested has been adressed in the V2. Geometry is now adjustable via Flip-Chips in the Dropouts and there are three Rear-Axle-Standards to choose, plus 140 mm Reartravel. Will it ride differently than the V1? We will see, but I´m sure it has improved in every way ...

    By the way Keith - NoStyle and Sizing and such ... :
    Was still a little unsure due to Framesizing, so I measured myself several times again, as my Body-measurements were done when I was 21 years of age. I am now 180/181 cm tall, with an inseam of 85-86 cm.
    Don´t know if this is a "bad" news or a "sad" news, because now I am 45 years of age ... still getting older ... and ... still shrinking.
    The good thing: That should set me better to fit a Medium Spitty, as this one is going to be my Do-it-All-Bike for both climbing and descending, and everything where a nimble and playfull handling is preferred.

    Greetings
    NoStyle

  30. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    183
    So are the chainstays adjustable via the dropout chips? Or, does the chainstay length change with the adjustable geometry at the shock eye?h

  31. #131
    beater
    Reputation: evasive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by NoStyle View Post
    In my opinion every Bike with this "new-school-geo" do have (much) longer Wheelbase - that comes from the Fact that Seatangles are getting steeper, slightly longer Toptubes (for shorter Stems and wider Bars) and therefor longer Reach. Slacker Headangles too, but mostly shorter Chainstays as previous Models.
    This gives you a more "foreward-Position" on the Bike - in my opinion a great benefit for both Climbing and Descending. So hiawatha-de, all of what you have requested has been adressed in the V2. Geometry is now adjustable via Flip-Chips in the Dropouts and there are three Rear-Axle-Standards to choose, plus 140 mm Reartravel. Will it ride differently than the V1? We will see, but I´m sure it has improved in every way ...
    Well said. Keith also did a good job of explaining this in the Rune thread (I think that's where I saw it, anyway).

    This geometry is the way forward. I have one of the pre-production Primes and have been riding that since March. The advantages described are real. My Prime outclimbs my hardtail (a Yelli Screamy), and despite the 3" longer wheelbase it gets around the same tight switchbacks with no drama. And the downhills? Well...
    "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." - Dr. Peter Venkman

    Riding in Helena? Everything you need to know, right here.

  32. #132
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha-de View Post
    So are the chainstays adjustable via the dropout chips? Or, does the chainstay length change with the adjustable geometry at the shock eye?h
    Hi hiawatha-de,

    please check out some previews and Pictures that are linked here a few pages further, so you can see and clearly understand the new Features the KS-Link gives to the Runes, Primes and Spitfires.
    The Geometry is now adjustable through the new designed Dropouts, not the Shock-Mounts anymore. The Chainstaylength is NOT adjustable! It´s very slightly growing length comes from the more rearwarded Axlepath the slacker the Geometry is set.

  33. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    PM sent
    Cannot answer in PM due message counter, so: Thanks a lot!
    that gave me some ideas.

  34. #134
    Sled of Lead.
    Reputation: Lead-Sled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    185
    Ah, the suspense is killing me. When's the soonest this frame will be available?

  35. #135
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,167
    Quote Originally Posted by Lead-Sled View Post
    Ah, the suspense is killing me. When's the soonest this frame will be available?
    Yup, me to...then we have to all go through the same sizing dilemma like in the Rune thread

    Here is the latest info I got from Banshee on Nov. 6th. Could be a beautiful Christmas

    The first Spitfires should be leaving the factory in 2 or 3 weeks. Add another 3 weeks on the boat to get to North America & you should be able to get one before Christmas.

    Cheers

    Jon Hadfield
    Sales & Marketing Manager
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  36. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    183

    V2 improvements

    Keith,
    Can you give us a brief description of how the V2 will ride given its new improvements? Also, what is the increase in weight for the overall frame? Can you run the same headset as the V1? The banshee website hasn't been updated to determine this info. thanks.

  37. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha-de View Post
    Keith,
    Can you give us a brief description of how the V2 will ride given its new improvements? Also, what is the increase in weight for the overall frame? Can you run the same headset as the V1? The banshee website hasn't been updated to determine this info. thanks.
    The post 7 posts ago on this very page will show you the headtube specs
    Seems you can't use the V1's lower headset.
    Have a read through this entire thread for more info.

  38. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha-de View Post
    Keith,
    Can you give us a brief description of how the V2 will ride given its new improvements? Also, what is the increase in weight for the overall frame? Can you run the same headset as the V1? The banshee website hasn't been updated to determine this info. thanks.
    The spitfire V2 specs will appear on the website when the frames start shipping out. Weight will be a touch heavier than V1, but the frame is stiffer, has more travel, and modilar dropouts dropouts. When production frames are ready we will weigh one and post photo on website. The V2 has a different standard headset... tapered 44/56.

    In terms of balance, geometry and pedaling efficiency the spitfire V2 feels very similar to the V1 despite the exra 13mm of travel. However the suspension is definitely more supple and controlled when riding ard through rough stuff, and so holding the line is easier and you have noticably more traction when railing round sketchy corners and better control over rocks and roots. The V2 is more playful and easier to pop off things, bunny hop, manual and play around on the trail. The fun factor is turned up to 11!
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  39. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    923
    Are alot of riders waiting on the new Spitfire planning to try out a 650b for a front wheel & 26" on the rear? Seems like that would be fun.

    Looking forward to seeing the new builds next month!

  40. #140
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    Quote Originally Posted by bitewerks View Post
    Are alot of riders waiting on the new Spitfire planning to try out a 650b for a front wheel & 26" on the rear? Seems like that would be fun ...
    Me personally I will not mix Wheelsizes anymore. First ride is going to be with 26 and switch to 650B when more Forks than Fox 34er or Rock Shox Revelation (650B, 150/160 mm Travel) are available.

  41. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    67
    @builttoride: how does the new Spitfire compare to the Prime? Not sure if I want to go back to 26 inch wheels, but the Prime seems a bit heavy for my tastes (closer to the Rune than the Spitty, I'd say). Are you planning to introduce a more "trail-oriented" 29er? Thank you.

  42. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,023
    Quote Originally Posted by the evil bunny View Post
    @builttoride: how does the new Spitfire compare to the Prime? Not sure if I want to go back to 26 inch wheels, but the Prime seems a bit heavy for my tastes (closer to the Rune than the Spitty, I'd say). Are you planning to introduce a more "trail-oriented" 29er? Thank you.
    Yeah the Prime is comparible to the Rune more than the Spitfire. Perhaps the bike that you are waiting on is the one that you'll see a proto of next spring.
    Banshee Bikes Designer
    www.bansheebikes.com
    Banshee Blog

  43. #143
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    Yeah the Prime is comparible to the Rune more than the Spitfire. Perhaps the bike that you are waiting on is the one that you'll see a proto of next spring.
    Good news! Thank you!

  44. #144
    beater
    Reputation: evasive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by builttoride View Post
    Yeah the Prime is comparible to the Rune more than the Spitfire. Perhaps the bike that you are waiting on is the one that you'll see a proto of next spring.
    Wow! You guys will have quite the revised lineup.
    "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." - Dr. Peter Venkman

    Riding in Helena? Everything you need to know, right here.

  45. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,167
    Quote Originally Posted by the evil bunny View Post
    @builttoride: how does the new Spitfire compare to the Prime? Not sure if I want to go back to 26 inch wheels, but the Prime seems a bit heavy for my tastes (closer to the Rune than the Spitty, I'd say). Are you planning to introduce a more "trail-oriented" 29er? Thank you.
    Maybe a new Spitfire with 650B wheels? I've just gotten in 2 rides on some new Schwalbe NN 650B tires and wow, nice! These things measure almost a full 28" tall and I'm loving the ride and traction on the rocks we have here.
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  46. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    Maybe a new Spitfire with 650B wheels?
    I'm not totally convinced of the benefits of "mid-sized" wheels. Or, better: I think that could have been a good solution if we were to start mountain bike development from scratch, but at this point I think that 650b offer just a small advantage over 26" while limiting your choice of rims, tires, forks... To be honest I never tried a 650b bike so I could be wrong, but for now I'd like to focus on 26" and 29" (I reckon both formats have their pros and cons). In a couple of years we'll see if the manufacters want us to ride 650b bikes...

  47. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,167
    Quote Originally Posted by the evil bunny View Post
    I'm not totally convinced of the benefits of "mid-sized" wheels. Or, better: I think that could have been a good solution if we were to start mountain bike development from scratch, but at this point I think that 650b offer just a small advantage over 26" while limiting your choice of rims, tires, forks... To be honest I never tried a 650b bike so I could be wrong, but for now I'd like to focus on 26" and 29" (I reckon both formats have their pros and cons). In a couple of years we'll see if the manufacters want us to ride 650b bikes...
    You obvioulsy don't follow the 650B news and trends or you would know all the forks, tires and rims that are, or will be available very soon. And more coming. I've been on this bandwagon for 2+ years now and the benefits are real. A 28" tire like the the new NN is approaching a smaller 29" tire FWIW.

    Have a look at this link from the Taichung Bike Week in Taiwan 27.5 Developing News in the 650B forum.

    From Taichung Bike Week in Taiwan 27.5 Developing News
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  48. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    674
    Super excited for this bike, though I wish the Spitty got the blue instead of the Rune. Everything is exactly right - the medium sounds like it will fit me like a glove, the head angle is sweet, the 16.9" seat tube means I can get the seat low for AM-trials...

    Quick question though builttoride - would reaming the seatpost out to 31.6 be possible? I hate to give up my Reverb that's been flawless. I guess on that note, do you know offhand the maximum insertion on the medium? I've got the longer Reverb and hope to be able to slam it.
    Last edited by LostBoyScout; 11-21-2012 at 11:17 PM.

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    You obvioulsy don't follow the 650B news and trends or you would know all the forks, tires and rims that are, or will be available very soon. And more coming. I've been on this bandwagon for 2+ years now and the benefits are real. A 28" tire like the the new NN is approaching a smaller 29" tire FWIW.
    Now that the Fox 34 forks, ZTR Flow rims, and Schwalbe Nobby Nic and Hans Dampf all come in 27.5 I'm completely covered. Not sure if I'll do it but all the tools are there.

  50. #150
    Hard funkin´ Kraut
    Reputation: NoStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    842
    @ Keith:

    Due to the Geometry-Chart the Spitfire is compatible to Forks with maximum 160 mm Travel and ZeroStack-Headset. I suspect that a taller Fork with 170 mm will void the Warranty.

    My Fork-Choice isn´t clear yet. Maybe I can get a Deal on a 160 mm 650B 34er Fox, which for sure does have a taller A-2-C (around + 10 mm?) than a 160 mm 26" 34er Fox. I too plan on running an Angleset, which must have a external lower Cup because of Tapered Steerer. Unfortunately the new Forks are Tapered Steerer only and that gives some limited Choices. All of this will add height.

    Does this affect the Warranty? Is it straight max. 160 mm Travel and ZeroStack, regardless of Wheelsize? Does the Warranty, and more important, the Construction and durability of the Spitfire allow for 160 mm plus External lower Cup?

    Many Greetings
    NoStyle

Page 3 of 49 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •