Results 1 to 44 of 44
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dir-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,394

    why not more debate about helmets?

    A while back I had been following a debate on a BC ski forum

    http://www.telemarkskier.com/cgi-bin...c;f=1;t=001358

    about how resort skiing has become more dangerous over the years. The debate gets pretty involved with pros and cons of wearing helmets to ski and snowboard. An often used arguement against their use is that these helmets (which are way more over-built compared to your typical xc helmet) are only designed to protect up to 20 mph. Presumably using helmets can increase the risk of injury since the average speed on an intermediate run is about 30 mph and, as indicated by lots of anectodal and more substantially tested evidence, people gain a false sense of security when wearing a helmet and subsequently take greater risks. Even many of those who favor helmets admit that they are probably only good at preventing "nuisance injuries".

    I know there are a few people out there that argue against wearing bike helmets (and in one case I think the arguement is based on the choking hazard present when wearing them off the bike) but in the bike world the debate is WAY more biased towards the pro-helmet side. Why do you suppose that is? Did I just miss a lot of the arguing when bike helmets were coming on the scene?

  2. #2
    Your Customer Sales Rep
    Reputation: Duncan!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by dir-T
    A while back I had been following a debate on a BC ski forum

    http://www.telemarkskier.com/cgi-bin...c;f=1;t=001358

    about how resort skiing has become more dangerous over the years.
    As one poster already said ... all the evidence is anecdotal. Nobody ever posted FACTS showing that resort skiing has become more dangerous (eg head or just injuries per 1000 skiers or something like that). If such statistics or studies exist, there would be something to argue about, other than "When I was a kid, yadayadayada ... ". D.
    You be you. I'll be riding.

  3. #3
    That's my name
    Reputation: mr plow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    649
    Wearing a helmet is a non issue for me, if i know i am going to be riding for any length of time, i put one on. I have had many instances where i have been whacked in the head by low tree branches whilst trail riding, and others where i have crashed and hit my head. On one ride a friend hit his head on a tree branch so hard it would have most certainly knocked him out if he wasn't wearing a helmet.

    The only helmets i have issues with are downhill helmets, some offer nowhere near the level of protection they should. Motocross helmets with DOT safety standards are much more appropriate, especially considering the speed that a decent dh bike is capable of these days. Look at John Waddell, i understand that his team made the decision to run mx helmets over bicycle oriented full face helmets, that decision probably saved his life.

    I have found a good site that looks at just about every bicycle helmet on the market, it provides some really information if any one is about to buy one.
    Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute
    Last edited by mr plow; 04-08-2005 at 02:35 PM.

  4. #4
    Linoleum Knife
    Reputation: forkboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,316
    I've landed on my head enough to appreciate the protection of a helmet.

    I won't ride with people who don't wear them. It's purely selfish. I don't want the responsibility of telling a family their loved one died of stupidity. I don't want to ride out with a dead body over my saddle, And I don't want to have to clean brains out of my tires after a ride.

    Edit - - > and to answer the question about the debate in skiing, snow is soft compared to rock and dirt. For 99% of skiiers, if you hit a tree, you screwed up really badly somewhere.
    Most of the "extreme" skiiers I know (my sister and her friends) all wear helmets. So do most snowboarders I see - they fall down a lot more than skiiers, so it's only natural.
    Last edited by forkboy; 04-08-2005 at 02:08 PM.

  5. #5
    My post is that way --->
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    515
    Not got a clue about the snowboard/ski arguments, but most MTBers are more aware of the hazards in MTBing - rocks, trees, the instability of the bike in certain terrain - compared to the soft landing that snow can provide. Given that most MTBers have started to ride since helmets were widely available and affordable, there hasn't been much of a cultural impediment to their use.

    With old-time roadies it is obviously a different story. Culturally it is much more difficult to adjust to wearing something that is a relatively recent development. And the argument that it doesn't afford much protection carries more weight in the types of accidents that you might have on the road.

    It is still a common debate though, but more about riding in general - whether helmet use should be compulsory for cyclists - not about MTBing specifically. And if it was as Pro as you suggest, then compulsory helmet use would surely be more common than it is.
    Wibble

  6. #6
    Perpetually single track
    Reputation: ibmkidIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,170
    Purely ancedotal for me, but I've broken over 7 mtb helmets in my short mtb "career" of 5 years. Each time I destroyed a helmet, I was really glad to be wearing it...and I'm betting at least two of the times I wouldn't be here typing had I not been wearing one. I've had plenty of violent crashes w/o my head touching dirt/rock and no neck injuries from that. Perhaps the arguement does hold true though...my confidence drops to near zero w/o my helmet. I never ride w/o a helmet...even when tooling around on a flat bike path.

  7. #7
    Foreign Entity
    Reputation: Ray_from_SA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    275
    I have a Giro Hammerhead with a gouge across the top of it from a tree branch, it was one of those fallen tree incidents on a trail I was used to and a tree had recently fallen.
    The gouge is about 1/2" deep and 1" long and at the time I connected the tree branch I hit it hard enough that I was momentarily stunned!
    The point is, I am glad I was wearing that helmet as I am pretty certain any branch that could make that dent in my helmet and stun me would have done a lot more damage to a bare head!

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dir-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,394
    I'm not arguing one way or the other about helmets - I wear them for bikes and boards. I'm just curious why it's really not a debate in the bike world while skiers (at least those on the board I posted the link to, and a couple other people I know - including a lower-level pro) can argue all day long about it.

    I think this is probably the best explanation...

    "Given that most MTBers have started to ride since helmets were widely available and affordable, there hasn't been much of a cultural impediment to their use. -Seb"

    As for this...

    "and to answer the question about the debate in skiing, snow is soft compared to rock and dirt. For 99% of skiiers, if you hit a tree, you screwed up really badly somewhere. - forkboy"

    That could be the case at some ski areas but not all of them, and definately not in an out-of-bounds setting. It's not hard at all to hit a tree during a high speed run through a gladed area. Nor is it tough to fall in a tight rock-walled chute.

    And lastly, and maybe most important to me...

    "but I've broken over 7 mtb helmets in my short mtb "career" of 5 years -imbkid"

    How fast were you going and what type of impacts were they (straight into a tree, fall sideways with head hitting the ground, head over heels ragdoll type thing)?

  9. #9
    Linoleum Knife
    Reputation: forkboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,316
    nm

    My post had nothing relevant to this thread or this board.

    Sorry
    Last edited by forkboy; 04-08-2005 at 03:01 PM.

  10. #10
    Perpetually single track
    Reputation: ibmkidIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,170
    Most were slower speed OTB's, one was an inch of dust on top of smooth rock, wheels slipped outevenly, head contacted ground before anything else did. Another I was maxed out on my 44x11 on a fire road and lost it somehow...don't remember much from that one.

    *shrug*....I got no skills and if I wanna actually ride, the more padding the better.

  11. #11
    Village Dirtbag
    Reputation: @dam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,276
    I think there are plenty of good reasons.

    Rock/Pavement/Cars: hard and rough, Snow & padded lift towers: soft and slick
    Singletrack and road shoulders: narrow, Slopes: wide
    Mountain Biking: you're on your own, Skiing: Ski Patrol is there along with plenty of others

    That said, I'm shopping for my first ski helmet in my 23 years of skiing.

    Edit: damn that makes me sound old. For the record I'm only 27.
    Last edited by @dam; 04-08-2005 at 06:57 PM.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dir-T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,394

    Giro 9

    Quote Originally Posted by @dam
    That said, I'm shopping for my first ski helmet in my 23 years of skiing.
    My wife has one and it's sweet.

  13. #13
    Trail rider and racer
    Reputation: Trevor!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,692
    We need Pete, he generally has some interesting points to make about helmets.
    Trev!

  14. #14
    []D [] []\/[] []D
    Reputation: zenorb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    204
    We have enough rules and too little common sense.
    Noone should be able to tell me that I have to wear a helmet. I should be smart enough to wear one or man enough to accept that I might get hurt and not sue someone if I do manage to get my dumb ass really screwed up.
    If I want to take it easy and feel the fresh breeze in my hair - that should be my choice. Screw anyone that wants to tell me differently.

    Noone should have to wear a helmet - everyone should. Bedwetting liberal pansies always think they know what is best for everyone else (obligitory shot at the left). Why not let those that choose to not wear helmets go off and kill themselves - or live though the experience unscathed. Either way - let people make decisions themselves then let them deal with the consequences.

  15. #15
    Ass-kickin chili fixins
    Reputation: Master Shake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    374
    Why not more debate? Cause in most cases, it's out of our hands. Much like wearing seatbelts.

    Much of the time, helmets & seatbelts will protect what & how they're designed to protect. Sometimes, they don't. Sometimes, they cause more injury than if you didn't use em at all. But what's there to debate? It is what it is. If you didn't know, you can research it and find out, in an effort to weigh the pro's & cons, and make a conscious, intelligent decision. Unfortunately, it will do you no good. Instead of educating people or encouraging intelligence, it's cheaper in the short-term to just make a couple lawyers rich, and just pass a law that says people MUST wear seatbelts and helmets. It has aparrently become lawmakers (on both R&L sides, don't kid yourself buddy) jobs to save us from our ignoramus selves, whether we like it or not this makes it easier for us to remain unintelligent.

    Yet another case of everyone knowing what's best for everyone else...

    Getting away from frickin politiking busybodies are why I ride my bike in the first place.
    Last edited by Master Shake; 04-08-2005 at 04:38 PM. Reason: Aff, in the time it took me to pen this, Zenophobe or whatever posted basically the same thing.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Anonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,799
    Quote Originally Posted by zenorb
    We have enough rules and too little common sense.
    Noone should be able to tell me that I have to wear a helmet. I should be smart enough to wear one or man enough to accept that I might get hurt and not sue someone if I do manage to get my dumb ass really screwed up.
    If I want to take it easy and feel the fresh breeze in my hair - that should be my choice. Screw anyone that wants to tell me differently.

    Noone should have to wear a helmet - everyone should. Bedwetting liberal pansies always think they know what is best for everyone else (obligitory shot at the left). Why not let those that choose to not wear helmets go off and kill themselves - or live though the experience unscathed. Either way - let people make decisions themselves then let them deal with the consequences.
    2nd that.
    Your fear of looking stupid is holding you back.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,126
    I wear a helmet when I ride a bike, period. I've taken both low and high speed falls where i was glad to be wearing a helmet.

    I don't when I ski. If I skiied chutes, jumps, trees, technical backcountry, I might re-evaluate it.

    Think about the two celebrity skiing deaths that pushed helmets to the light. The Kennedy family member, who was involved in a game of catch while skiing down a run, and Sonny Bono, who was loaded on prescription pills. Both avoidable, pilot error type accidents.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hankthespacecowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    516
    - "And lastly, and maybe most important to me...

    "but I've broken over 7 mtb helmets in my short mtb "career" of 5 years -imbkid"

    How fast were you going and what type of impacts were they (straight into a tree, fall sideways with head hitting the ground, head over heels ragdoll type thing" -

    From what I understand, helmets of all sorts are intended to deform in the event of a crash - it's how the energy of the impact is absorbed, much like crumple zones designed into cars. Sure, you could wear a cast-iron helmet and it would not deform in a crash, but your head sure as hell would. All helmets are intended to be "used" only once. There is always a statement with the helmet that in case of a crash, it should be returned to the manufacturer to check for soundness. A helmet that was destroyed in a crash was simply doing it's job.

  19. #19
    Glad to Be Alive
    Reputation: SHIVER ME TIMBERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    42,733
    I have to say I am thankful I have had a full face helmet. After one fall on an easy trail, I knew that an XC helmet wouldn't save my teeth.....now only Full Face
    the trick is ENJOYING YOUR LIFE EACH DAY, don't waste them away wishing for better days

  20. #20
    you cant handle bars.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    72
    you have to remember where and what we are riding, compared to skiing and snowboarding. unless you hit a tree (not the majority of crashes on snow/ski), a crash at under 20 mph isnt going to hurt much because of what your falling on- soft snow (unless its ice, where a helmet would help). on bikes, a low speed crash can be just as damaging as a high speed one because the bike itself, the hard ground, the mulitude of trees, roots, rocks, etc that are on or right next to the trail to hit. or for road riders, the tarmac, curbs, sewer grates, etc. ive never worn a helmet skiiing, but for recreational skiier on a large mountain thats groomed, its not really necessary. ive never crashed and said, man i wish i had a helmet. ive broken a helmet or two, and ive landed many times on my head that, without a brain bucket, surely would have done some damage, either skin scrapes, concussion, etc.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Endo pro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    28

    Saved my life 3 times over the last 15 years

    I went head on to a bridge stantion on a motocycle at 35 mph. It shattered 4 layers of fiberglass out of six. I had on a Simopson full face race helmet, I hit it with my forehead, damaged my neck and broke some bones but I am still alive to crash some more. Number two I was a victim of a hit and run on my bicycle, the driver hit me so hard I flew 10 feet or so into a tree where my back got hurt and my head hit the trunk so hard it broke my helmet in half. It was an old white bell helmet from the late 80's. The last time was some time last July, I took a six foot drop ride into a creek that everyone crosses without a problem as I have countless times before. this time I went over the handle bars hit the rocks at the bottom my head I remember bouncing off the rocks at the bottom. My spine was saved by the CamelBak I had on I still broke 3-4 ribs and compacted 2 discs and tore up my arm pretty bad.It broke a Bell Aquila into three peices. Now if this is not a testemony to wear a helmet then You would not be getting this thread from me because I would have been dead after the first wreck.
    I now wear a Giro Semi-MX because it is a hard shell and I don't ride a Motocycle anymore. I still crash allot but I know I will not be a vegtable. I hate to see people without helmets because I know how they save lives.
    I don't ride, I close my eyes and hang on for dear life.

  22. #22
    Ass-kickin chili fixins
    Reputation: Master Shake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    374
    Quote Originally Posted by Endo pro
    I hate to see people without helmets because I know how they save lives.
    I know they save lives too. And I've had a couple critical conditions myself. But it's not really any of anyone's business but my own if I want my life saved, is it? If we were kept ignorant in the face of the risk, then there may be an argument regarding our appointed rulers being responsible, and at that point, they would be right to decide to either educate us, or simply pass a law. But that's not the case. I know the risks, and have made an informed decision regarding the value of my life and my desire to preserve it. I don't need to be protected from myself, and I appreciate those who can recognize this. So I'll continue to take the helmet & seat belt tickets under a bogus alias, and continue to drop them back off at the police station in the evening with an explanation.

  23. #23
    chainpain
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by zenorb
    Bedwetting liberal pansies always think they know what is best for everyone else (obligitory shot at the left). Why not let those that choose to not wear helmets go off and kill themselves - or live though the experience unscathed. Either way - let people make decisions themselves then let them deal with the consequences.
    Oh, the politicians who always think they know what is best for everyone else are called liberal over there. Funny. "Over here" we call em conservative socialists.What on earth does liberalism have to do with prohibitions? United States of America is a strange part of the planet.
    Last edited by chainsuck; 04-13-2005 at 01:00 AM.

  24. #24
    MG6
    MG6 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    17
    helmet in general protects and saves injuries. Does it saves life? Yes and No. We can all put on a helmet for all kinds of sports but if you are using it improperly, then what is the purpose in wearing one in the first place.

    The misconception of helmet usage is... the education in using a helmet isn't put or stressed enough on how it is used, worn and the sign of failure.

    Yes, you could wish to opt out on wearing a helmet and it is true that your life is yours and no one else but... who is paying for the bill at the end of the day? Tax payer which is us and including yourself. What really gets me when someone say "it is my life and no one else, so don't control it!" Well, we do live in a free country (to a point) but we also live in a country where suing someone is their rights.

    So if it is ok in your terms in not wearing a helmet, it might not be ok for your parents or family members because they have the golden finger of suing the city, the person who didn't cut the tree that day, the stupid puddle of water that the sun didn't dry up quick enough for you to have a better eye sight of the road.

    So let it be, wear the helmet and be protected.

  25. #25
    Ass-kickin chili fixins
    Reputation: Master Shake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    374
    Quote Originally Posted by MG6
    ...
    Some good thought went into that post. Very nice.

    So by your own admission then, the problem would be one of failing to recognize personal responsibility. In this case, part of that responsibility is making sure my "family members" know that I'm completely aware of the risks, and have accepted them. Imagine how many times a person has this conversation with the people who love them over the decades before it reaches you on an internet forum.

    When I was a kid just out of high school I made sure death was wrapped up with the family lawyer. Occasionally, I make sure it's up to date. I figured I wouldn't live to see 30 with the kind of riding I do, and I was very, very close to being right. I can't see why anyone who participates in a hazardous lifestyle such as driving in cars or riding off road wouldn't take the same precautions.

    Who is footing the bill? There is no bill. No one who knows me is suing for anything, whether theres ice on the road, or a piano falls out a window. Shti happens, you let it go, and you move on. I die, well, it had to happen sometime. In the early 90's, I lost out on a 36 million dollar deal. I could have sued ten years later when I found out why & how. But it wasn't right in the first place, and suing was only goign to make a bigger mess out of it. You've just got to accept the chaos that make's this cramped little world function, and get on with your short life. People who berate each other over nickels & dimes... well, it looks a lot like swine in the trough. Go beg for your feed. What was your positive contribution that made all the resouces you consumed while you were here worth it?

    I'm not suicidal or anything, but I have no illusions of anthropocentric grandeur either, and if an opportunity comes along to end this absurd existence, I'll take it.

    Or maybe you could just tell me to wear a helmet and I'll do it. But probably not.

  26. #26
    They say I have a problem
    Reputation: rbart4506's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    460
    But they rarely deal with the consequences themselves...Their actions will always affect others...Some people are too stupid to know what is good for them and for that society steps in a tells them...
    "The meek shall inherit the earth"

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    545

    Helmets suck!

    or should I say "Compulsory helmet wearing sucks"

    I started riding motorbikes in the days before helmet laws. Sometimes I wore a helmet (if it was cold), sometimes I didn't. I had 55 accidents before I was 25. Most were caused by ice, but I was hit by cars 3 times. These were with and without helmet. Not once did my head make contact with anything. My helmet remained pristine and my leather gear got scuffed up.

    I haven't fallen off my bicycle for over 30 years.

    In North Queensland, Australia I have to wear a helmet - which I think is stupid because it puts me at risk. Why? Before the helmet law came in I wore an open mesh hat which gave plenty shade to the top of my head (bald) and my face. With the helmet I get sunburn (very fair skin) on the top of my head and face. I consider the risk of skin cancer to me is much higher than the risk of an accident. Covering the holes in the helmet, or wearing a bandanna under it leads to an intolerable heat buildup.

    As an adult I am capable of making my own decisions. Thus helmets suck.
    "The man is richest whose pleasures are the cheapest" Henry David Thoreau (obviously a single speeder)

    "...everytime you throw something away your load gets lighter..."

  28. #28
    MG6
    MG6 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    17
    MS - I agree on what you are trying to say. But in this sick world that we live in, it is best to advise riders to be protective and safe than to fight a loosing battle which people see it as a no win situation.

    I know death comes to everyone some day, maybe not today or tomorrow but someday. I know the risk and i know how far my risk taking in my life will bring me and my family. I also know the speed of life goes. I ride a sport bike everyday and i encounter numbers of close calls where others (drivers) don't or can't see you because of their stupid mistakes. I'm not saying that i'm a hero or telling my story about riding a motorcycle is the most dangerous sport but... any sport is dangerous!

    Anyways, my point is, i agree on what you saying and no matter how disagreeing this topic bring to others, i (myself) just tell them to be safe and move on. It is best to have a rider who enjoys the same sport as you on the road and share the same passion. It is also great to learn skills off each other on experience, story telling or whatnot down the road thru the encounter you had during your thrills.

  29. #29
    That's my name
    Reputation: mr plow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by datako
    or should I say "Compulsory helmet wearing sucks"

    I have had about 8 motorcycle accidents in ten years of riding and about three of them involved hits to the head. One in particular would have been extremely serious if not for my high quality full face helmet. A car turned in front of me and i hit the side of it at 70km/h or so. My face hit the roofline and my chest smashed the passenger side window. My helmet was severely cracked on one side where it covered my jaw and cheek. All of my front teeth were loose for nearly a week. The only thing that happened to me was severe concussion and bruising, plus an overnight stay in hospital. Even though i could hardly move at all for the next week, i was totally happy to be alive and thankful for my helmet. I even asked for it while in hospital so that i could see what saved me a heap of pain and possibly worse. Helmets in my opinion are compulsory because they will save your noggin in the event that you actually hit it. Just think yourself lucky you didn't hit your head in all those crashes.

  30. #30
    MG6
    MG6 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    17
    I have no doubt in my mind that helmet for bicycle sucks majorly. I'm currently doing a research on motorcycle helmet on fitment issue and came across on bicycle helmet. I can't believe how it is created and how poorly it is designed. Yes, you could say your helmet brand is one of the best out there and it got top reviews, but as a designer looking into a product, i say... they could do better than that. Is marketing behind the design at times? Sure, it got something to do with how it is designed and what material is manufactured. Why aren't there better helmets out there or at least a better solution in the chain strap issue? Well, there are tons of research articles out there that tested this method and is there a solution to this problem? At the moment, i couldn't find a solution. There might be a suggestion but a solution, no. If someone is to say, there isn't a study on this topic (chain strap, helmet failure, etc..etc..) I'll just tell them to look deeper and not just read the articles on the magazine or just hear others say so.

    As for the holes on the helmet. I find it funny as well why there so many holes. I could see a foundation structural kinda support to how the design looks but so many holes in a helmet??? I guess it is to reduce cost on manufacturing and also, lightness plays a role on the holes.

    And for the sunburn, i guess the designer never thought of that when they created the helmet in the first place. Some designer believes and goes by what they think is cool and of course, the mass general consumer will think it is cool or a piece of crack when it hits the market. sometimes, consumer can't help what is on the market and they have to purchase them because of "good reviews".

    anyways, my point is. I agree on how the helmet sucks when you can't even protect yourself on issue that needs attention and correction in the design. Also, It doesn't help when all brand of helmet looks the same or is the same. Total Suckage.

  31. #31
    That's my name
    Reputation: mr plow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by MG6
    As for the holes on the helmet. I find it funny as well why there so many holes. I could see a foundation structural kinda support to how the design looks but so many holes in a helmet??? I guess it is to reduce cost on manufacturing and also, lightness plays a role on the holes.


    I think ventilation has more to do with it than anything.
    Try riding XC with a skate style bucket helmet for a few hours and you will see why helmets have so many holes.

  32. #32
    L1MEY
    Reputation: mahgnillig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    796
    I think on a bike, you're probably a lot more likely to hit your head than you are skiing. A lot of bike accidents involve endos... my hubby has broken two helmets in the last six months by sailing over the bars and landing on his head. I haven't been skiing in a long time, but your feet are strapped to two planks, so it's pretty hard to hit either your forehead or the back of your head, and if you go over on your side, most likely your shoulder will take the force. Without hesitation I always wear a helmet on a bike, but I don't think I would on a well groomed resort ski slope.

    As far as helmet laws go, yes, they're designed to protect the unfortunately stupid people, but also the rest of us too. If you make an informed decision not to wear a helmet and your family is fully aware of that, then good on you, at least you're being sensible about it. It's not those people that are the problem. The problem is Little Johnny's mum, who buys him a bike but doesn't even think about a helmet until he knocks himself stupid doing a wheelie drop off a park bench, and then sues the pants off the park, the city and the guy walking his dog nearby. Then we all end up paying (indirectly) when our taxes go up because the park's insurance went up.

    - Jen.

  33. #33
    MCF
    MCF is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MCF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    723

    Hitting low hanging branches...

    I wear a helmet 100% of the time; however, I have noticed a lot of people saying they have hit their helmet on low hanging branches and were glad they were wearing a helmet...but what are the chances you wouldn't have hit anything if you weren't wearing a helmet!?! I am an engineer and go out to facilities a lot of times and wear a hard hat while I am there...I have hit my hard hat a number of times on a piece of pipe that I wouldn't have hit at all if I was not wearing a hard hat....I know I have hit my helmet on branches that I would not have hit if I was not wearing a helmet.....the helmet and hardhat stick up more than we are used to and that is why they get hit more often.....

  34. #34
    Linoleum Knife
    Reputation: forkboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by MCF
    I wear a helmet 100% of the time; however, I have noticed a lot of people saying they have hit their helmet on low hanging branches and were glad they were wearing a helmet...but what are the chances you wouldn't have hit anything if you weren't wearing a helmet!?! I am an engineer and go out to facilities a lot of times and wear a hard hat while I am there...I have hit my hard hat a number of times on a piece of pipe that I wouldn't have hit at all if I was not wearing a hard hat....I know I have hit my helmet on branches that I would not have hit if I was not wearing a helmet.....the helmet and hardhat stick up more than we are used to and that is why they get hit more often.....

    You want to be the guinea pig? I know the perfect tree limb to try it on. I thought I had compressed my neck an inch when I whacked it. I never even saw it.

  35. #35
    MCF
    MCF is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MCF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    723

    I'm not disagreeing the importance of a helmet...

    but I bet the top of my helmet sticks up about an inch from the top of my head....do you want to be the guinea pig...with a response like that, maybe you did hurt your neck....

  36. #36
    ¡Manos arriba!
    Reputation: NoDunut4U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    336

    stating the obvious:


  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    19

    Multiple impact helmets

    I am not trying to hijack the thread, but what do others think of multiple impact, hardshell helmets available now? I know they are heavier, but for the day to day knocks and bumps, are they not a better deal than the lighter soft shells that are "supposed" to be chucked after any major impact? I recently bought a Protec Ace Dig as my thrasher helmet for those rides I expect to catch some knocks. This helmet has SXP multi-impact foam, which is supposed to return to full function after an impact. It is much heavier and hotter than my Bell, but I cracked the last softshell after ducking into the car and then catching the helmet on the roof rack bar. The helmet stuck up 3 inches further than I was used to when avoiding the bar. DOH!

    BTLG

  38. #38
    MCF
    MCF is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MCF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    723

    That must be you with the bat....

    Nice self portrait...

  39. #39
    Linoleum Knife
    Reputation: forkboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by MCF
    but I bet the top of my helmet sticks up about an inch from the top of my head....do you want to be the guinea pig...with a response like that, maybe you did hurt your neck....
    If a neck compression would make me a surly individual I must have done it about 15 years ago

    I wasn't trying to pick a fight - I don't disagree with your statement, I am just unwilling to be the person to test out your theory. And the limb I am talking about is exactly one of those "Helmet might have caused contact" limbs.

  40. #40
    MCF
    MCF is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MCF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    723

    No worries.....

    it's pointed out all the time when working in a facility wearing a hard hat that "I wouldn't had hit that if I didn't have my hard hat on"....this usually comes from some 'old-timer' that would probably kill himself if he didn't have safety forced on him......

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    764
    As much as I am a big proponent of personal responsibility, this issue does not occur in a vaccuum. Nobody likes being told what to do, but given the situation as it is there is a simple chain of causality here:
    -if you ride, you will eventually fall, maybe hard
    -no helmets means greater likelihood of extensive injuries
    -greater injuries means higher medical costs and bigger lawsuits (I know, it sucks, but thats what happens in the real world)
    -big medical bills and lawsuits mean big payouts from insurance companies
    -unhappy insurance companies control enormous lobbying power in all legislatures
    -legislators make helmet laws and no riding laws, and no access laws, and all kinds of other things.
    -once you have no access to your favourite riding areas, you are free to e-huck all you want while jibbing madly on your X-box

    Liberal/Conservative has not all that much to do with it in the end. If one were to look at it with a cynical eye, it all has to do with keeping the big insurance companies happy (and rich). If one were to look at it differently, happy (meaning rich) insurance companies tend to invest in all kinds of things that keep the economy going so that people like you and I can have the opportunity to buy our bikes and all of our other toys.

    I simply choose to wear a helmet so that I can avoid a situation in which other people ARE going to tell me what to do (where to ride, what to wear, how to think,etc).

  42. #42
    Bike to the Bone...
    Reputation: rzozaya1969's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    8,291
    Have you ever seen a bike accident involving a head crash? I have, and I really think that the helmet saved the guys head. The helmet came out broken in three pieces, and his head only a small bump.

    I will not ride without it.

    Regarding if in some ocasions it may make it more dangerous, it's like a seat belt. There may be crashes where wearing the seat belt killed the driver, but I think there's a LOT more where it has saved lives.

    I don't know about skiing, but I really think helmets are a must in mtb.

  43. #43
    ronbo613
    Guest
    Reasons for me:
    One of my riding buddies got a little carried away, hit a jump way faster than he should have, went up instead of out, turned rubber side up and landed right on his head. Split the helmet in half and cold cocked himself. I had to decide if I should ride for help or stay and help. It was getting dark, luckily he came to and was able to make it to a main road where he waited while I rode to get my truck. Luckily, he was OK, only a sore neck and headache the next day. Since then, I wear a lid, so does everyone else we ride with or they don't go with us.

    I was riding my dirt bike in the desert about 50mph when I hit a wash and got pitched over the bars. Went bouncing across the desert and was knocked out cold. When I woke up, my friends were pulling cactus spines out of me(they went through my leathers and into my skin). My Bell helmet was split in two. Had I not been wearing it, I'd be dead, or vegetableized.

    Have never worn a helmet in more than thirty years of skiing and snowboarding, but if I was 16 again and busting twenty foot airs in an icy half pipe, I might think about it, but since I'd be a knucklehead teenager again, someone would probably have to make me wear one.

  44. #44
    MG6
    MG6 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by mr plow
    I think ventilation has more to do with it than anything.
    Try riding XC with a skate style bucket helmet for a few hours and you will see why helmets have so many holes.
    Yes ventilation is the main point in all the holes or whatnot and i know the head produce the most heat in the body. Trust me, i done my research on this topic, but that doesn't mean you have to make so many vent holes. If you look at the design of other helmets on the market and you compare them with the one you have, you see a big difference in style, holes and why there are certain style to it.

    Again, i'm not saying the holes aren't great for ventilation but you must factor in the cost of production and why they have so much holes which might at times compremise the function of the helmet. Yes, helmets in general is a one time usage but does it really pass the DOT or Shell requirement? If you look at the annual report on these testing (helmet product on the market) you will notice that only the expensive ones make it on the passing level and the cheaper ones doesn't make it or barely make it on the mark. But get this, they still sell them on the market (public) because they are in production. If they don't get a call from the government or from a customer, then they will just continue to produce a product that is marked as, poorly made.

Similar Threads

  1. Why one-hit helmets? Going skateboard style?
    By 24601 in forum Apparel and Protection
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-12-2005, 07:33 PM
  2. Are any helmets safer than others?
    By dgangi in forum Apparel and Protection
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-26-2004, 11:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •