Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15

    Osprey Talon 22 vs Osprey Escapist 25 vs. Osprey Escapist 30

    Does anyone have one of these packs? I have it narrowed down to these and can't decide between them.

    Talon 22


    vs.

    Escapist 30


    vs.

    Escapist 25 (same as the 30, just 25L)


    Main things I will be using it for (in order of frequency)...
    1) Commuting
    2) Hiking
    3) Travel
    4) Camping

    Advice and opinions appreciated.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Shalom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,002
    Seems to me that you just need to figure out how much carrying capacity you want/need. After that, pick the pack that matches. I am sure that there will be small differences between Talon and Escapist, but just choose the one that is going to carry what you need.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,352
    I have a 30 liter pack. It's twice the size of my cycling pack. Only use it for a gym bag. Unless you're riding 8+ hour epics or carry lots of stuff you'll find it too big. I use the Vaude 14+3 liter Hyper Air and still haven't needed to open the bellows bottom to make it 17 liters.
    Even my 20 liter Deuter I found too large mountain biking and just use it skiing on really cold days for extra gear.
    Last edited by abegold; 09-01-2012 at 06:40 AM.
    agmtb

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by abegold View Post
    I have a 30 liter pack. It's twice the size of my cycling pack. Only use it for a gym bag. Unless you're riding 8+ hour epics or carry lots of stuff you'll find it too big. I use the Vaude 14+3 liter Hyper Air and still haven't needed to open the bellows bottom to make it 17 liters.
    Even my 20 liter Deuter I found too large mountain biking and just use it skiing on really cold days for extra gear.
    Do you think a 25L would be too big?

  5. #5
    Rides the Desert
    Reputation: ltk1144's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    255
    The escapist is not a hydro pack. I like the layout better than the Talon though. It has pocket for the bladder but it doesnt use the hydrolock system or sternum magnet and also wont come with the bladder. Thats the main difference, also a pretty big size difference. Decide what you need out of it. You can watch youtube video reviews if you are unable to check them out in stores.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,956
    For most riders, 15-20L is plenty big for MTBing. I use a 30-Liter pack for commuting.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: armoredsaint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by fsrxc View Post
    For most riders, 15-20L is plenty big for MTBing. I use a 30-Liter pack for commuting.
    +1 like others have said - for my MTB i use a small Osprey Raptor 10 - 3L water capacity.
    2012 Trek Fuel EX8 - Matte Black

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,160
    I've actually been looking into these same packs for day hiking (not so much for mtn. bike use). All are considered panel loaders vs top loaders which is what I wanted. The Talon 22 universally seems to get rave reviews on the net that's for sure. The Escapist is very cool and really designed for biking with it's more supportive waist belt and shoulder straps and proper internal pockets and even a built in rain cover. What I didn't like was the complaints it received for the undersized pockets on the waist belt and shoulder strap where I think Osprey blew it (yes that's important to me for hiking) compared to some of their other packs like the Krestel and Manta series which I'm also considering. You could also look at the Raptor 14 and 18. A 25 or 30 liter pack is really big for mtn biking but you're using it for commuting and hiking, camping and travel so perhaps not mtn biking. Then that larger size makes more sense. Tough decision but I ruled out the Escapist due to those small pockets. Might not matter to you at all.
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    I've actually been looking into these same packs for day hiking (not so much for mtn. bike use). All are considered panel loaders vs top loaders which is what I wanted. The Talon 22 universally seems to get rave reviews on the net that's for sure. The Escapist is very cool and really designed for biking with it's more supportive waist belt and shoulder straps and proper internal pockets and even a built in rain cover. What I didn't like was the complaints it received for the undersized pockets on the waist belt and shoulder strap where I think Osprey blew it (yes that's important to me for hiking) compared to some of their other packs like the Krestel and Manta series which I'm also considering. You could also look at the Raptor 14 and 18. A 25 or 30 liter pack is really big for mtn biking but you're using it for commuting and hiking, camping and travel so perhaps not mtn biking. Then that larger size makes more sense. Tough decision but I ruled out the Escapist due to those small pockets. Might not matter to you at all.
    Excellent point! Definitely something I will be considering.

  10. #10
    I don't huck.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,530
    I compared them in this review.
    Blog Ramblings
    West Coast writer for twentynineinches.com

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,160
    Quote Originally Posted by mtroy View Post
    I compared them in this review.
    Nice review and I hadn't seen that one (ah 2in 1 sort of)

    Anyway it confirms my complaint with the Escapist waist and shoulder pouches. They just need to be bigger. Not sure what Osprey was thinking here but hopefully they get the message and change that feature and this will be a killer pack IMO. Until then Talon, Manta or Krestel panel loader for me (day hiking not mtn biking). I like the bike organizer features even for day hiking though.
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by mtroy View Post
    I compared them in this review.
    Thanks for that review!

    Does anyone know when Osprey comes out with their new season of packs? I was curious because I don't want to choose the Talon 22 for the flaw of small pockets on the Escapist series, only to turn around and they have it fixed on the '13 models.

  13. #13
    Rep Power: Infinity
    Reputation: NateHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,620
    I have a Talon 22 which is my main do-everything pack. I don't really need such a large pack for most rides, but after buying the Osprey, I'm not thrilled with my old MULE. The Osprey carries much better and I'd rather carry it even though it's bigger. I will be getting a smaller pack for shorter rides soon.

    That said, it's great for longer rides where you need more gear. I use mine daily for commuting, and today, I stopped at the LBS (local beer shop) and picked up a 6-pack, which fit well.

    Mine did not come with a bladder, but apparently they changed that recently? I put a bladder of my own choosing in it.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    179
    I had a Talon 22 for a few months before it was stolen. Loved it. Wanted to buy a replacement, but could not find one so bought the escapist 30L (only complaint with the Talon was it was a bit small for my needs). The waist pockets are to small and far back and the escapist takes more fiddling to get it just right (and then you change the size or weight of the load and you need to fiddle with the straps again to get it just right). I prefered the ease of use of the Talon, but appreciate the extra size of the escapist. Both are awesome packs, but for bike packing/commuting/camping use I prefer the escapist. The included rain fly is cool, and the pocket layout is well thought out and really useful. Some people seem to think the shoulder pocket is too small, but it is just right for me.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15
    I'm going to check out the Talon 22 in person this weekend. I don't think they sell the Escapist series though, so I'm not sure if I will be able to make a final decision without trying it out.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,160
    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceTrees View Post
    Thanks for that review!

    Does anyone know when Osprey comes out with their new season of packs? I was curious because I don't want to choose the Talon 22 for the flaw of small pockets on the Escapist series, only to turn around and they have it fixed on the '13 models.
    Not sure about the Talon but the Escapist wont see a redesign until 2015 as I emailed Osprey about the pocket issue. They seemed genuinely interested in my concerns about what I wanted to be able to carry in the pouches and a product manager got back to me.

    Here's some info on the Escapist

    Funny thing is we designed this pack for Europe for overnight bike trips. There are a lot of hut to hut multi-day mountain bike rides out there. But it did so well there and any of us who got a hold of one in the US office loved them. We have some great overnight bike trips in our backyard in SW Colorado but we also realized they make a great pack for just about everything. Hiking, biking, school, work, everyday use, etc. The pockets do well to carry some energy food, small point and shoot cameras, etc. I can get my iPhone in the waist belt but not the harness pocket. The problem with smart phones in the shoulder harness pocket is smart phones are huge! It simply makes that pocket to big. We designed the shoulder harness pocket more for small mp3 players or for a couple of energy gels.
    I donít have this on the schedule to at least Sí15 but when we get there we will reevaluate what people are using it for and also the types of things that people are carrying and where they want them.
    PeaceTrees, let me know what you think of the Talon. I've gotta go hunt down some of my pack choices this weekend and try to make a decision.
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: zukrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    260
    buy at REI. if you dont like it, take it back.
    2012 Airborne Guardian.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: zukrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    260
    also, have you considered gregory? im a fan of gregory over osprey. not to say osprey is not a good product, just prefer gregory construction.

    Miwok 18 gets great reviews
    Miwok 18 - Gregory Packs - Products - Men's - Technical

    I unfortunately am not compatible with any pack smaller than 65L, due to my chest size. good luck with your decisions.
    2012 Airborne Guardian.

  19. #19
    The Hutch
    Reputation: rob1208lv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,238
    I too am considering a big bag, But I was thinking the bigger the better since i want it for bike packing adventures.. thoughts ?
    follow me on twitter
    @RobertEHutch

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •