Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: awai04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,002

    When will come the sub 30 lb., 7-8" trail / freeride bike?

    As soon as that happens, I'm lining up for another bike!

  2. #2
    Village Dirtbag
    Reputation: @dam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,274
    When carbon nanotube composites are perfected.

  3. #3
    user-created
    Reputation: singletrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,181

    Why?

    Why on earth would you want such a thing?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: awai04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,002
    Ok, I resurrected this thread I started from months ago. Sounded like the initial reaction was one of astonishment. But with the 05 enduro already out (6" rear travel), santa cruz nomad on its way (6.5"), and intense 6.6 (er, who knows exactly but let's say 6.4" harhar... ha) in testing, is the idea really a crazy one?? If anything rings true time and time again, more is better in the US. What do you all think?

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    13
    My Iron Horse Sunday World Cup weighs about 14lbs fully built [SIZE=1]on the moon [/SIZE] . By the way although it probably doesn't qualify as freeride, the Iron Horse MKIII Team weighs about 27 - 28lbs and has 145mm travel in the front. BTW, I have a new one for sale, lol.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #6
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,582
    Quote Originally Posted by @dam
    When carbon nanotube composites are perfected.
    Actually lower production costs for welded magnesium tubesets would do it faster/cheaper than perfecting nanotube composites.
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  7. #7
    MTBR Mafia
    Reputation: cdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,558
    thats one sick ride.
    All Mountain was so 2005

  8. #8
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,743
    Uh... it would be cool but it wuld shake like a jell-o over rough stuff unless you wear some ballast.

    But, hell! Why not??
    Check my Site

  9. #9
    a dad
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,352
    the maverick L7 i believe fits your inquiry, it only cost around $6k though
    BBZ

    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin

  10. #10
    telemarc
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    293

    looks like my reign

    It is amazing the resemblence this bike has to my Giant Reign 1.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RiDE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    88
    The Nomad is 30lbs isn't it?

  12. #12
    user-created
    Reputation: singletrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,181
    Quote Originally Posted by RiDE
    The Nomad is 30lbs isn't it?
    My Banshee could be 30 pounds if I hung a bunch of lightweight, disposable parts on it.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RiDE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by singletrack
    My Banshee could be 30 pounds if I hung a bunch of lightweight, disposable parts on it.
    Really?!!!!!!!!!!!! That's cooooooooooooooooooooool!!!!!!!!!

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by singletrack
    My Banshee could be 30 pounds if I hung a bunch of lightweight, disposable parts on it.
    You're...

  15. #15
    user-created
    Reputation: singletrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,181
    Quote Originally Posted by boyRacer
    Naw, I'll never compare to Connery. Thanks tho.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4
    Theres a mag in the UK called Dirt (I'm sure some will have heard/seen it. Anyways this month they've got a 223 built with an air shock and Fox 40's plus a machined down XTR chainset. Apparently its pretty light - I don't know how light but its been done by suspension specialists MOJO so theres plenty of money behind it.

  17. #17
    .
    Reputation: frank n. beans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    804

    second that

    Quote Originally Posted by singletrack
    Why on earth would you want such a thing?
    I want a freeride bike with 700x23 tires.
    [SIZE=1]Don't believe everything that you think.[/SIZE]

  18. #18
    "El Whatever"
    Reputation: Warp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,743
    Quote Originally Posted by RiDE
    The Nomad is 30lbs isn't it?
    I dunno. But reading last night the numbers of geometry shown in last MBAction, my Warp will have similar geometry as the Nomad once I install a Vanilla Fork.

    Obviously my Warp will still be the boat anchor it is and with an inch and a half less travel.... anyway, I don't need a 6.5" bike.
    Check my Site

  19. #19
    Just roll it......
    Reputation: ebxtreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,495

    No way ST......

    Quote Originally Posted by singletrack
    My Banshee could be 30 pounds if I hung a bunch of lightweight, disposable parts on it.
    ST,

    I'm assuming you have a Chapparal, because a Scream couldn't get to 30 lbs. if had every carbon and ti part in the world dripping off of it. Even a Chap couldn't get that low without dropping serious coin for components that would snap on the first cased gap. But, then again....and as you asked, why would you want to??

    I firmly believe that a 6-8" travel bike with a weight ~30 lbs. is gonna be outfitted with components that will break (wheels, bars, etc.) IF the bike is used for it's intended purposes. Some folks that are moving up in the travel department don't grasp that this step often coincides with the lust for going off and over everything in site and down stuff you've never even considered in the past. When this happens, crashes occur and wheels start to taco and carbon parts start to snap.

    While it's true that I took my FR bike on every ride (XC, Shore & Whistler, Urban, etc.) for a solid year, it was like driving a Hummer to the mall on most XC stuff......total overkill. I've since overhauled my XC rig (4" rear and 5" front) and that bike is ~33 lbs. due to burlier components/wheels and it's plenty durable for most of the technical stuff out there and still totally climbable for XC.

    I'm definitely biased by where I live/ride, but I think the whole "30 lb. 6-8" trailbike" conversation doesn't make sense.

    Cheers,
    EB

  20. #20
    user-created
    Reputation: singletrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,181
    Quote Originally Posted by ebxtreme
    it was like driving a Hummer to the mall on most XC stuff
    Heh, that's a good analogy, although parking is easier.

    Banshee claims to have built a Chap to 27 pounds using air shocks and flimsy parts. Mine sits at 45 right now....

    Anywho, good points, in general if don't want the bulk, you don't need the travel either. I'd take stiff, burly, mid-travel bike to a noodly, fragile long-travel bike anyday.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    235

    Chumba

    My CHUMBA EVO is built up right now at 30.3 lbs. I could probably get it under 30lbs. with a lighter wheelset, tubeless, carbon bars, and seatpost. It is 6 inches of travel, but feels like more because of a progressive compression rate. There will be a version close to 7 inches of travel released later this year I hear.
    Last edited by carnetorta; 04-21-2006 at 08:30 PM.

  22. #22
    OlTime XR500 JumpingChamp
    Reputation: CrystalBay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    98
    Hmmm that EVO is a pretty interesting design...

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    235

    ..

    Quote Originally Posted by CrystalBay
    Hmmm that EVO is a pretty interesting design...
    Yup, it's pretty cool, pedals really well, I'm loving it so

  24. #24
    Ride on
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    640

    my first thought, but...

    Quote Originally Posted by ebxtreme
    ST,

    I'm assuming you have a Chapparal, because a Scream couldn't get to 30 lbs. if had every carbon and ti part in the world dripping off of it. Even a Chap couldn't get that low without dropping serious coin for components that would snap on the first cased gap. But, then again....and as you asked, why would you want to??

    I firmly believe that a 6-8" travel bike with a weight ~30 lbs. is gonna be outfitted with components that will break (wheels, bars, etc.) IF the bike is used for it's intended purposes. Some folks that are moving up in the travel department don't grasp that this step often coincides with the lust for going off and over everything in site and down stuff you've never even considered in the past. When this happens, crashes occur and wheels start to taco and carbon parts start to snap.

    While it's true that I took my FR bike on every ride (XC, Shore & Whistler, Urban, etc.) for a solid year, it was like driving a Hummer to the mall on most XC stuff......total overkill. I've since overhauled my XC rig (4" rear and 5" front) and that bike is ~33 lbs. due to burlier components/wheels and it's plenty durable for most of the technical stuff out there and still totally climbable for XC.

    I'm definitely biased by where I live/ride, but I think the whole "30 lb. 6-8" trailbike" conversation doesn't make sense.

    Cheers,
    EB
    I was thinking the same thing - how are you going to build a 30lb bike out of a 14lb frame? Fortunately Light Bikes came to the rescue. Just imagine a Scream with the parts build on this bike. By my calculations it would weight only 25lbs! And I'm sure it would be a blast barreling down rock gardens with semislick tires and v-brakes.

  25. #25
    I ride a Swarf
    Reputation: Stuart B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by telemarc
    It is amazing the resemblence this bike has to my Giant Reign 1.
    More accuratly the Reign looks like the Ironhorse

    Both look very nice though.

    Stu
    What exactly is a rigid hard tail?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mountain bike jargon/ lingo
    By bstguitarist in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-26-2005, 01:02 PM
  2. Replies: 67
    Last Post: 03-01-2005, 07:03 AM
  3. Proposed Skeggs Trail Management Plan
    By font9a in forum Singlespeed
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-04-2004, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •