Results 1 to 48 of 48
  1. #1
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059

    Pryme AL & Deviant test.

    The Deviant showed up at the shop today...no, not me...the helmet. I was looking forward to comparing one of these to my modified Pryme ALs. To start, I was surprised how light the non-carbon Deviant is compared to the Pryme...not a lot, but it is lighter. In reality it may not be as substantial as my Pryme. Inside it's actually more like the styrofoam insert of a high quality XC, open-face helmet installed inside a very nice, light full coverage hard shell. In fact, the styrofoam moves just a tiny bit inside the shell. I'm going to shim this area to prevent movement with some thin rubber strips. The Pryme AL's inside styrofoam is solidly mounted inside the shell. We got some other Deviants, and they also have this slightly loose fit in the shell/styrofoam area. I don't see it affecting safety, as it isn't going to move anymore, and the inner styrofoam fits the head perfectly. That inner styrofoam insert even has the adjustable head band retention like the XC helmets.

    The venting is every bit as good as my Pryme, which I suspected as much just from the pics of Deviants that I had seen. The earhole padding is velcro removeable, and I ditched that right quick. The chin strap pads also unsnap with ease leaving a nice, wide, comfortable chin strap. Surprisingly the inside of the Deviant looks very much like the inside padding of my modified Pryme, and they felt very similar in the padding location and ventilation. I guess I knew what I was doing when I modded the Pryme.

    It's clear that both of these helmets will get the job done. They're both very cooly ventilated. I like the visor on my Pryme a tiny bit better. The inner fabric liner of the Deviant is removeable, so it will be easier to wash. Oddly even though the Deviant's chin guard appears to be further out, it's easier to get a Camelback mouthpiece up to my mouth in the Pryme for some reason. The Deviant is not difficult, just a little harder for sucking water than the Pryme. What's the bad news? Both helmets are easily good candidates for AM use, so you'll have to decide. The Deviant is missing most of the padding I removed from my Pryme, so you won't have to do any real work to the Deviant. The Deviant is usually noticeably more expensive than Pryme, but the '06 Deviants should be on sale now if the shops will be honest with you.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Be sure to check fit. The Prime does not fit me at all. The Specialized fits as if molded from my head.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hardway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    774
    thanks for the write up TNC, I have been trying to decide between these two. does either one feel stronger or more solid over all?

  4. #4
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    hardway, to my surprise the Pryme may actually have most substantial foundation, but with helmets you have to have a freakin' lab situation to really test helmet strength and integrity. The Deviant seems a little flimsier than the Pryme, but I seriously doubt that's the case. Why?...the Deviant, to my surprise, has a full Snell certification...very impressive. Does that mean the Pryme isn't as strong?...no. It just means that Pryme didn't spend the money to try to get the testing and possible certification, so all of this is hard to tell. As far as "feel" goes, IMO the Pryme has a more substantial feel on your head. And if you recall from my post a few weeks ago, I fully field tested one of my Prymes with a head landing straight into an imbedded rock pile. The inner foam got a crack from the really, really hard head plant right at the point of impact, so it did exactly what it needed to do. However, since the Deviant has a Snell rating, I don't have any reservations in its integrity. I gotta admit that if I was at a ski resort doing straight shuttle stuff in heinous conditions, I'd use my Mad Max over either of my other helmets. Otherwise, I'm wearing the Pryme or Deviant for all my trail use.

    hardway, these helmets are so similar in venting capability that my final decision as to which helmet I'd wear at any given time will probably boil down to style...yes, I admit it. Though I think both helmets look very good from just an appearance aspect, the Deviant is slightly more stylish in a kind of pimp-my-ride way. So when I'm at Moab or riding with a group out at our gnarly riding place, perhaps I'll don the Deviant more often to enhance my Cedric Gracia image. God...I hate to admit that...LOL!

    One other advantage on the Deviant is that you won't have to mod the padding like I did on the Pryme. It seems many who got the Pryme to use as a trail helmet are terrified to mod the jaw, ear, and neck padding. I say, don't be afraid...Specialized did exactly the same thing with their Deviant. Just don't remove anything from the cranial area.

  5. #5
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    I agree Shiggy. I notice this issue with other helmet brand fit situations too. At the shop, we have a standing joke since we mainly sell Giro and Specialized helmets as our primary brands. Many people either have a "Specialized" head or a "Giro" head. Though many are fully able to wear either brand comfortably, many others seem to have a definite head shape that favors one brand or the other. I might also mention that many helmets that have the adjustable perimeter headband seem to fit a wider array of heads. The Deviant has this style of headband, so maybe another plus for the Deviant.

  6. #6
    Takw/agranofsalt
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,534
    TNC,

    Thanks for the write-up but I have one question that I don't belive has been addressed yet. When you removed some of the padding in the Pryme around the jaw, ears and neck did it affect the side to side movement of the helmet at all? (and does the Deviant have this problem as well?) What I mean is on a fast, rocky rough trail does the helmet ever move around on your head? I've experienced this with other helemts but I'm sure it was just due to the helmet being too large for my head. I tend to prefer a tighter fit so that the hemet doesn't have any unwanted lateral movements or bounce around when I'm really trying to concentrate on the trail.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: hardway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    774
    thanks for your thoughts TNC, although I can't say that made my decision any easier. there's a sweet deal on the pryme at pricepoint, so that may be the decison maker. sounds like I can't go wrong with either, unless I have a "shiggy" head.

  8. #8
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059

    Hmmm, check this out.

    That slightly loose shell/foam fit that I mentioned in my original post is fairly evident from this pic. As I said, the others seem have this same "looseness", so I think this may be consistent on these helmets. Apparently the glue they use to bond the inner foam to the shell isn't up to par. None of the glue points were sticking the shell to the foam. Now...on the other hand, the foam fits fairly snuggly in the shell, and it's obvious it isn't going to just fall out. And actually I don't think it will contribute to an unsafe condition...but then again, who knows. The actual impact absorption will come from the foam portion of the helmet, and it stays securely attached to your head. Not an impressive turn of events, however. I'm not sure what I will do at this point. I may contact Specialized about this and get their take. I feel that the right glue would address this issue, but you really have to know what glue to use, as these styrofoam inserts can absolutely dissolve with the wrong glue, and you have to know what glue will make the proper bond between the two dissimilar materials involved in the shell and insert. Maybe this why the '06 models are reduced in price.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #9
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    I agree Shiggy. I notice this issue with other helmet brand fit situations too. At the shop, we have a standing joke since we mainly sell Giro and Specialized helmets as our primary brands. Many people either have a "Specialized" head or a "Giro" head. Though many are fully able to wear either brand comfortably, many others seem to have a definite head shape that favors one brand or the other. I might also mention that many helmets that have the adjustable perimeter headband seem to fit a wider array of heads. The Deviant has this style of headband, so maybe another plus for the Deviant.
    I generally have a Bell/Specialized head though it varies from model to model. The only Giro that fits (and fits great) is the Semi.

    The head bands (I call them head clamps) have their limitations, too. The basic shape of the helmet still needs to be a good fit for it to protect well. If a helmet is not stable without tightening the clamp, I will not use it.
    I once saw a women who's head only filled the front half of the helmet. She had the head clamp pulled all the way tight so it did stay on but I could have put my fist between the back of her head and the hemet foam.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  10. #10
    Formerly DMR For Life
    Reputation: Full Mountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    990
    TNC I think that you have a defective product there...i would contact spec. about a replacement....the foam in mine is firmly in there

    I'm with shiggy on the fit the pryme doesn't fit me but the deviant does...the pryme is tight on the front and back of my head...while the spec. fits much better

    DMR

  11. #11
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059

    Yeah, defective.

    Quote Originally Posted by DMR For Life
    TNC I think that you have a defective product there...i would contact spec. about a replacement....the foam in mine is firmly in there

    I'm with shiggy on the fit the pryme doesn't fit me but the deviant does...the pryme is tight on the front and back of my head...while the spec. fits much better

    DMR
    Yeah, Spec is already sending a couple of new helmets to the shop to replace a couple of these "loose" ones. It's definitely just a glue problem, but I guess stuff happens. I definitely like the helmet, and I think it's great to have two options now.

    Oh, on the Pryme fit, I noticed the same thing until the neck padding mod was done. Though I was doing the mod for the ventilation, a side benefit was a more comfortable fit. The neck padding seemed to "pinch" the head forward a bit. DMR, did you wear yours with the padding mod? Just curious. In the aftermath of the Pryme AL for AM thread, I've found hardly anyone did the padding mod.

  12. #12
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    stripes, I'm still surprised to hear these "too hot" comments from many folks who've tried the Pryme. I'm finding that most of the riders who say this didn't pull the padding out like I did. Without pulling out the neck, jaw, and earhole padding I'd agree that the helmet is absolutely too warm. My Pryme is very similar to the inside of many open-face XC lids if you actually compare the venting and contact points on your head. In fact, as I said earlier, the Deviant just looks like the Pryme with the padding mods on the inside. Actually, the modded Pryme may have just a little more ventilatation at the rear of the helmet. Did you pull all the padding that I indicated on your Pryme?

  13. #13
    ...
    Reputation: BikeMk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    In the aftermath of the Pryme AL for AM thread, I've found hardly anyone did the padding mod.

    I think this is most likely due to two factors. First, as you pointed out, people are afraid of compromising the integrity and/or safety of their helmet by modifying it. Second (and for me most importantly) I believe that most people find that the helmet is not stable on their head when some padding is removed--specifically the cheek/ear padding, but possibly other padding too.

    If the helmet fits your head perfectly, and perhaps a little tightly, you might not notice this. However, I notice that as soon as I remove the cheek padding I get a drastic reduction in helmet stability. I think this problem could be solved through raising the chinstrap mounting anchors so that the strap would run along side the head and then under the chin (like a conventional bicycle helmet), instead of just under the chin (like a rice paddy worker's hat.)

  14. #14
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    stripes, I'm still surprised to hear these "too hot" comments from many folks who've tried the Pryme. I'm finding that most of the riders who say this didn't pull the padding out like I did. Without pulling out the neck, jaw, and earhole padding I'd agree that the helmet is absolutely too warm. My Pryme is very similar to the inside of many open-face XC lids if you actually compare the venting and contact points on your head. In fact, as I said earlier, the Deviant just looks like the Pryme with the padding mods on the inside. Actually, the modded Pryme may have just a little more ventilatation at the rear of the helmet. Did you pull all the padding that I indicated on your Pryme?
    Most riders do not modify their helmets
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  15. #15
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059

    Now Shiggy...

    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    Most riders do not modify their helmets
    With that type of thinking we'd still be on the eastern side of the Atlantic....or riding rigid singlespeeds. Oh...wait a minute...you ride a rigid singlespeed...with drop bars. ...so nevermind.

    Seriously though, on these full coverage helmets, it's a fairly safe procedure to modify jaw, neck, or earhole padding as long you use some form of common sense and leave the cranial padding alone. If you leave jagged fiberglass surfaces or epoxy blobs sticking out where your neck, jaw, nose, or ears will get scraped or cut during an extreme impact, then yes, that's an ignorant move. The Pryme mod I've done on mine mirrors exactly what's going on inside a Deviant, so I feel fairly confident about that. And again, I'd be very leary of modding the cranial area of any helmet. I'd say you should generally leave that alone. If you'll look closely at the pic of the inner shell of the Deviant, it's nothing more than a skate-style lid inside of a full coverage shell. Now I can't tell if your comment was just an observation or a comment on the wisdom of modifying a helmet, but I don't think that properly modding a full coverage in these heat retaining areas I mentioned is a bad move. Remember, we're making a trail helmet out of a helmet normally more suited to DH/FR shuttled use. I'll wear my Pryme and Deviant over an open-face XC helmet for trail riding any day, and my unplanned helmet test on my first Pryme a few weeks ago just confirm my scaredy-cat attitude toward open-face helmets.

    I don't have any negative thing to say about the reason most riders wear open-face helmets for most riding, because that's their perogative and totally their call. Since it seems that helmet manufacturers, other than the Spec Deviant, are not addressing this "middle ground", coming up with reasonable options seems to be a reasonable pursuit. I'd think a guy who rides an MTB with drop bars would agree with thinking outside the box on equipment issues.......BTW, that's a joke, shiggy.

  16. #16
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    With that type of thinking we'd still be on the eastern side of the Atlantic....or riding rigid singlespeeds. Oh...wait a minute...you ride a rigid singlespeed...with drop bars. ...so nevermind.

    Seriously though, on these full coverage helmets, it's a fairly safe procedure to modify jaw, neck, or earhole padding as long you use some form of common sense and leave the cranial padding alone. If you leave jagged fiberglass surfaces or epoxy blobs sticking out where your neck, jaw, nose, or ears will get scraped or cut during an extreme impact, then yes, that's an ignorant move. The Pryme mod I've done on mine mirrors exactly what's going on inside a Deviant, so I feel fairly confident about that. And again, I'd be very leary of modding the cranial area of any helmet. I'd say you should generally leave that alone. If you'll look closely at the pic of the inner shell of the Deviant, it's nothing more than a skate-style lid inside of a full coverage shell. Now I can't tell if your comment was just an observation or a comment on the wisdom of modifying a helmet, but I don't think that properly modding a full coverage in these heat retaining areas I mentioned is a bad move. Remember, we're making a trail helmet out of a helmet normally more suited to DH/FR shuttled use. I'll wear my Pryme and Deviant over an open-face XC helmet for trail riding any day, and my unplanned helmet test on my first Pryme a few weeks ago just confirm my scaredy-cat attitude toward open-face helmets.

    I don't have any negative thing to say about the reason most riders wear open-face helmets for most riding, because that's their perogative and totally their call. Since it seems that helmet manufacturers, other than the Spec Deviant, are not addressing this "middle ground", coming up with reasonable options seems to be a reasonable pursuit. I'd think a guy who rides an MTB with drop bars would agree with thinking outside the box on equipment issues.......BTW, that's a joke, shiggy.
    Just pointing out why you should not be "surprised to hear these "too hot" comments."
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  17. #17
    Formerly DMR For Life
    Reputation: Full Mountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    990
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    Yeah, Spec is already sending a couple of new helmets to the shop to replace a couple of these "loose" ones. It's definitely just a glue problem, but I guess stuff happens. I definitely like the helmet, and I think it's great to have two options now.

    Oh, on the Pryme fit, I noticed the same thing until the neck padding mod was done. Though I was doing the mod for the ventilation, a side benefit was a more comfortable fit. The neck padding seemed to "pinch" the head forward a bit. DMR, did you wear yours with the padding mod? Just curious. In the aftermath of the Pryme AL for AM thread, I've found hardly anyone did the padding mod.
    no i didn't in fact i've never even owned a pryme just from trying it on in the store...the deviant is the first FF that i've owned... i would have a hard time buying a helmet and modding it to find out that it still doesn't fit and the pressure on the front and back of my head was significant with the pryme

    DMR

  18. #18
    Freeriding Feline
    Reputation: SuperKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,548
    I had to take that head clamp thing out of my Deviant. MAN that thing was killing me. Totally dug right into my scalp. Feels much better now. Fits very well also. I think it's a great helmet.
    "If you give up your dream, you die."
    Twitter - KIKat1029

  19. #19
    Purveyor of Trail Tales!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,127

    Good job! I did the modification and it was great!

    Quote Originally Posted by TNC
    .......the aftermath of the Pryme AL for AM thread, I've found hardly anyone did the padding mod.
    Hi Mr. TNC,

    I modified mine and have loved the result! Let me take this opportunity to say Thanks, again, for posting your test results and directions. I appreciate your willingness to ďtake one for the teamĒ and be the first to cut up a perfectly good DH/FR helmet in hopes of making it better for AM use. Iím sure part of my willingness to modify the helmet came from already owning an excellent Giro XC helmet and a fantastic Vigor DH/FR helmet. I knew that this experiment, if it turned out poorly, wasnít going to mean that I didnít have a helmet to use. Also, instead of trail use, Iíve used the Pryme AL primarily for riding the training stunts and skinnies I built in my yard. I call them training stunts/skinnies because nothing is over 3 feet tall. Additionally, the landing zone around each stunt is free of obstacles and is grass covered. That said Iíve felt much better using a FF when Iíve been on an 8 inch wide, 24 foot long skinny elevated 3 feet off the ground. Because of the modifications to the Pryme Iíve been able to play on the new toys when it was far too hot to be using my Vigor.

    However, I have experienced many more strange looks while wearing the Pryme and doing a local ride hiting some of the natural jumps and rocks in the neighborhood. The FF definitely looks more threatening to Joe Citizen than a XC lid.

    Michael
    If you can't keep the rubber side down......at least smile for the camera!

  20. #20
    the goose is loose!
    Reputation: rm_racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,276
    hey, TNC, can you get a pic of the deviant with the ear pads in place? are they just pads that rest against the ears or are they full motorcycle helmet style cheek pads?

  21. #21
    29er Geek
    Reputation: tozovr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,540
    Quote Originally Posted by shiggy
    I generally have a Bell/Specialized head though it varies from model to model. The only Giro that fits (and fits great) is the Semi.

    The head bands (I call them head clamps) have their limitations, too. The basic shape of the helmet still needs to be a good fit for it to protect well. If a helmet is not stable without tightening the clamp, I will not use it.
    I once saw a women who's head only filled the front half of the helmet. She had the head clamp pulled all the way tight so it did stay on but I could have put my fist between the back of her head and the hemet foam.

    It's cool to see that while Bell owns Giro, they keep the design/fit proprietary.

    I have a remedy and can say I love the looks of the Pryme, the new Deviant looks like some sort of lamprey/suckerfish gone arwy.
    unityhandbuilt

  22. #22
    Double-metric mtb man
    Reputation: Psycho Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,483
    I'm in the same boat, Shiggy....I haven't made the leap to a FF, so for the time being, I'm enjoying my Semi
    As if four times wasn't enough-> Psycho Mike's 2013 Ride to Conquer Cancer Page

    Moran? Let your opinion be free -> F88me

  23. #23
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    rm, the ear pads are just held in by velcro, and they aren't as substantial as full motorcycle helmet style earhole padding...good, but not as bulky.

  24. #24
    Bike Breaker.
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,764
    So TNC would you say the deviant is great for rough XC work where the advantage is the full face coverage, considering dropping some money on the 'cheaper' deviant. How are the fit of the newer 07 versions?

  25. #25
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059

    Substantial helmet

    Quote Originally Posted by catnash
    So TNC would you say the deviant is great for rough XC work where the advantage is the full face coverage, considering dropping some money on the 'cheaper' deviant. How are the fit of the newer 07 versions?
    Yeah, I think the Deviant is more than substantial enough for most anything. It's got a Snell bicycle rating which IMO puts its integrity as stout enough for just about anything. Don't know anything about the '07 except that to me they look identical from the website. Maybe someone can chime who's just bought one.

  26. #26
    Portland, OR
    Reputation: todd_freeride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,112
    funny, the deviant refused to fit me, where as my pryme hugs me well. I still think the pryme is the best helmet I've ever owned I never modded my pryme though, just fits me perfictly.
    Ibex bikes

    2007 Ibex Trophy SS
    2006 Jamis Komodo 3.0
    2006 Ibex Zone FR-1
    2004 Special-Ed P.2 A.1

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ScareyH22A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    282
    Sorry for thread jacking but I have a couple of stupid questions. What are those extra oddly shaped, one looking like the "Y" from their logo, pads? And also, how do you remove the decals on their helmets. It doesn't peel off like a regular decal but instead, flakes off like the ones you wet and put on a model car.

  28. #28
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    You lost me on the pads you're referring to. On the Pryme decals, they're just that...stick on decals like the hobby models use.

  29. #29
    kevin
    Reputation: Artcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    6

    Prices

    How much will a Specialized Deviant run me for cash?
    1- I did
    2- I am
    3- I will
    4- I can
    5- I Think i might
    6- I might
    7- I think i can't
    8- I can't
    9- I wont
    10- I wont and you can't make me

  30. #30
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    Well, if they properly reflect the new lowered cost to the dealers, they should go for somewhere around $90-$100. Remember, these are closeout '06 models.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    88
    I agree that the venting and awesome appearance of this helmet is the best. You can actually hear wind whooshing through this helmet unlike any other helmet I've tried.
    That being said...... I love the hemet,,,,, or loved it until I had a head hitting crash with it. First off , the velcro that holds the liner in can and does scrap your head upon impact. This left a very cool upsidown cross on my forhead a-la Harry Potter style. Second, this helmet was never intended for any serious hits. There is no padding. There is noooo padding. So, all that hard foam becomes hard foam hitting your head like a hard rock.. I was seriously dazed from my hit. Oh the LINER is the padding for your head-- well the liner is about as thick as a T shirt. Third, the helmet is fragile, too fragile at this price point. The innards cracked apart in 3 places rendering the helmet un- usable. Can you say disposeable? My helmet is now wall art ( My bud suggested cutting it in half from front to back and mounting it with a picture next to it. yeah we had video).
    So I learned a lesson, The coolest looking helmet isn't always the best. I ended up buying an 07 Giro bout the same price/
    I am the biggest Specialized lover, own a Demo, but I have to give this one a thumbs down.. unless you're a lycra clad dirt rodie...Sorry

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mkiv808's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    252
    I love my Pryme AL. Fits me like a glove. My Giro Transfer fits really well too.
    Santa Cruz Bullit AM build

  33. #33
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    XCE I agree with some of your comments about the lighter built nature of the Deviant, but in reality isn't that what we're trying achieve here? Nobody wants to wear a full tilt DH/FR helmet...or can wear one...when riding true trail conditions for any length of time. As I stated in my initial comments, my Pryme actually feels a little more burly in its protection level, but I also had to modify it a good deal to make it truly trail useable. The Deviant really is just a beefed up trail helmet, and so it should be. Remember we are looking for jaw, nose, and face protection that a trail/XC helmet doesn't offer. Expecting it to be up to the standards of something like a Giro Mad Max, TLD, or similar helmets is unrealistic IMO.

    On the issue of the fabric liner in the Deviant, it's as thick as just about any trail/XC helmet, and it's not the part that absorbs impact anyway. You mention the "raspberry" you go from the inside of the helmet. I got a small one on my forehead when I destroyed my Pryme Al from a really hard hit in a rock pile. The same thing has happened to me in the past on occasion in some dirt motor get-offs. If you hit right and something tries to push the helmet around on your head, a small boo-boo isn't a major issue...but you're right...the helmet shouldn't move too much.

    This all kind of points out how or maybe why most helmet manufacturers are leary of venturing into this "crossover" area in helmet design. Some will say one of these given helmets is too much while another group says it's not enough. I still say that apparently most manufacturers aren't going to get involved, so our choices will continue to be pretty slim in this helmet category. I'm glad that there are at least a couple of fairly substantial ones to choose from now.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    88
    I guess I was a little confused to see pro riders like Matt Hunter using the helmet for fullon balls-out freeriding in the movie ROAM. Sends the wrong message about the use reccomendations of the helmet. He did crash with the full carbon Deviant.... I wonder if he hit his head???
    About my Boo-boo. I didnt mention the rearward hit to my head which was the real injury. A real brain slapper. One of the pointy ridges inside the helmet got me good...... It's just a very hard helmet.
    Also the inside foam seperated from the outside fiberglass.
    The cool thing is that I ziptied the foam back in place and might use the helmet for light trail riding/
    Stripes- did your helmet break?
    TNC- hope you don't crash with the helmet on because it friggin hurts..and I have crashed with head impacts before, nothing felt worst than this helmet....Just putting this "real world" info out there. Peace

  35. #35
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    XCE, you may have noticed my comment on the foam inner shell not being properly glued to the fiberglass outer shell on mine. I notice you mention your shell came loose in the crash. I'm not surprised. I don't think enough glue or whatever was injected into those 4 holes to make a good bond the way they come. Spec waranteed my helmet, but I got to keep the old one. I drilled and cleaned out the original glue. There were only those 4 little dabs of glue holding the shell in. I found that good old Liquid Nails won't eat the stryrofoam, so I shot the stuff into several spots and into the original injection holes with a caulking gun. The outer and inner shell will not separate now...LOL! I agree, this is a stout trail helmet and not a hardcore FR helmet. It did however warrant a Snell bike rating which ain't bad.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    88
    Here is an update. Specialized came through for me and warrantied the helmet since the outer had seperated from the inner. So I am the proud owner of an 07 Deviant.
    The cheek pads are noticably thicker and longer giving the helmet more stability. I do like the color scheme also (dark grey, grey, light grey). Also the medium from 05 is larger than the 07. This I like, less play- better fit. The retention device on the 07 seems Improved also, I had problems with the 05 popping loose.
    Now, saying what I said before and roasting the helmet for being crappy..........Well, It is what it is. It isn't crappy. And after taking it apart it was really well laid fiberglass and damn light weight
    It is not for DH, FR. It is for All Mountain. Period.
    I will use the new hemet in this fashion.
    I am extremely happy that my new helmet isn't wall art now and that It's usable. I am a happy camper now.

  37. #37
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    Glad to hear Spec took care of you. Through the shop dealings with them, they've always been very decent on addressing repair and warranty issues.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    215
    TNC-

    Do you guys have any of these left at the shop?

  39. #39
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    Our shop doesn't.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    783
    Quote Originally Posted by XCE-zer
    Third, the helmet is fragile, too fragile at this price point. The innards cracked apart in 3 places rendering the helmet un- usable. Can you say disposeable? My helmet is now wall art ( My bud suggested cutting it in half from front to back and mounting it with a picture next to it. yeah we had video).
    This is exactly what the helmet is supposed to do in a hard hit. The foam absorbs the impact so your brain doesn't have to. If you have a hard hit, you are supposed to replace your helmet whether it has fallen apart into pieces or not, since it won't be able to absorb another hit as well. It feels wrong having to dump a helmet that looks mostly ok - I've had to do this for a few XC helmets - but if your brain has much value to you, it's worth the cost.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ScareyH22A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    282
    When you strap the helmet on, in my case, the Pryme AL, and grab your chin guard and push into your chin, is it supposed to pretty much touch your chin? Or is there too much play if that happens and your whole head should push back with the helmet? Because I'm afraid that if I do a face plant, I'm still gonna break my jaw or break my nose or something.

  42. #42
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    Well, it shouldn't move too much, but it should move some. It's a little hard to tell about sizing issues over the internet. As some have pointed out, sometimes if there's a problem, it may not be a sizing issue, but instead an incompatibility issue with one's head shape and a particular helmet. Then on the other hand, if you have a Jay Leno chin, it might touch in any helmet. No flame...it's just hard to tell without seeing it in person.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    181

    Hey TNC and bxb...

    We have a small run of Al's and Deviants in stock. We ordered more. Keep selling the darn things.

    Just to add my two cents. I came from the XC stuff and now ride with my Deviant. I got used to it and am getting used to it more each time I use it.

    The only incident I have had so far is with a branch of a tree. If I did not have it on I would have been severly srcratched on the face. The Deviant now have a mark on the jaw guard.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •