Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Low or High?

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    20

    Low or High?

    Thinking about extremes here but...is it better to put the weight high or low. For instance, in the worst case is it better to put batteries, toolkits, water bottles, etc. on the frame or in the Camelbak? Or should you just balance it out? My new frame does not have water bottle bosses so I need to reconfigure where my extra liquids and battery should go. I can think of trails that would work better with the weight in either location. This leaves me with the choice of a bigger seat bag or stuff it in a bigger Camelbak.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Just stuff everything in your Camelbak, you're thinking about it too much! Besides, seat bags are massively uncool
    [SIZE="2"]Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine[/SIZE]

  3. #3
    TNC
    TNC is offline
    noMAD man
    Reputation: TNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    12,059
    And some seat bags will contact the rear wheel under full compression on many full suspension bikes. A very small seat bag for a tube or such isn't too bad, but many seat bags don't work well on many FS bikes. I like having most of my gear in a Camelback. On some longer rides, I'll even have 150oz. of water in my Camelback, and even on some very technical trails, I don't notice any extreme weight or center of graviity issues. There's some personal preference issues that go on with where to put stuff, but I think many items attached to the bike can cause more problems on very rough and technical trails than the same amount of stuff in a Camelback.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •