Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5

    head tube angle and stem length

    the relation between head tube angle and stem length: is it simple enough to be described in some kind of formula? what i mean is this: the steering is quickened if i choose a shorter stem and it becomes slower if i choose a frame with a slacker head tube angle: but can a 68 degrees frame be set up to be as quick in steering as a 70 degree frame: by varying the stem length? does a 71 degrees 120 mm correspond to say a 69 degrees 50 mm? does one slacker degree need 30 mm of shorter stem to retain steering quickness for example? or is the head tube angle much more decisive than the stem length? thanks rasmus

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 856er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    380
    I can sort of see what your trying to say but if it was that easy every frame would be the same angle and just vary stem lengths and rises,
    you have to also take into account by lengthening or shortening a stem you are also altering the effective top tube length (TT + Stem and rise) this could mean you get your desired steering but be uncomfortable because you are to stretched or hunched.

  3. #3
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,022
    No, not really. Stem length is for fit and weight distribution. It does change the handling but not in the same manner as HTA changes.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    315
    a question I've been dying to ask I think may be realted:

    let's say I'm riding a crappy old trek xc bike from the year 2000 (that I love to ride). It is set up with a xc susp fork that probably was marketed as having 3" of susp but probably more like 2". What will the effect to the steering be if I throw on a fork that has 120mm(4"?) of travel? What about a 5" travel fork?

  5. #5
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,443
    every inch of travel will change the HT angle ~1inch. BTW 5 inches is prolly a bit much of a XC ride...

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 856er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by Eerie
    a question I've been dying to ask I think may be realted:

    let's say I'm riding a crappy old trek xc bike from the year 2000 (that I love to ride). It is set up with a xc susp fork that probably was marketed as having 3" of susp but probably more like 2". What will the effect to the steering be if I throw on a fork that has 120mm(4"?) of travel? What about a 5" travel fork?
    You will slacken the head angle and slow down the steering.

  7. #7
    MK_
    MK_ is offline
    carpe maņana
    Reputation: MK_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    7,131
    Your climbing will suffer and you'll be more prone to popping wheelies on steep climbs. The bike will be harder to tame on the ups. On the downs you'll be rewarded with increased confidence and stability and plushness. Your steering will slow down, but you can make up the difference there, at least to an extend, with a shorter stem.

    You risk ripping off the head tube, though, as frames of that vintage designed with such short travel forks are not reinforced properly to be ran with a nearly 5in (120mm) fork. Stick to a 4in, 100mm and you should be good.

    _MK
    .
    "No man goes before his time -- unless the boss leaves early."
    -- Marx, Groucho

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •