Results 1 to 71 of 71
  1. #1
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46

    Canfield One - building thread

    Yup...I had a thread about the geo of the Canfield Sauce, but I changed my mind and ordered a One instead.

    Will try to maintain this thread with pictures and updates as things progress...and from what I hear from my local dealer here in Norway, the shipment from Canfield is soon on its way.

    The build will be:

    Canfield One - Large with Mica Blue links
    Fox DHX Air 5
    Rock Shox Lyric U-Turn 2008
    Formula Oro K18 180mm F
    Formula Oro K18 160mm R
    Shimano XT Cassette 9 Speed M760
    Shimano XT Rear Derailleur Shadow M772
    Shimano XT Front Derailleur Conventional M771
    Shimano XT Shifter Pod 9sp M770 F/R
    Truvativ Stylo 3.3 GXP
    Chris King ISO Disc 20mm Front Blue
    Chris King ISO Disc Rear Blue
    Chris King NoThreadset Blue
    Truvativ Team XC-DH Riser Bar
    Thomson Elite X4 MTB Stem 100mm
    Thomson Elite Masterpiece InLine
    Mavic EN521
    ODI Yeti Hardcore

    Will add with blue seat clamp and blue qr's to match the links and Chris King parts.

    Been saving up $$$ for some time now, to be able to build a new bike without pissing my wife off to much - and I think I made a right choice both regarding frame and equipment. Have tried to focus both on quality/strength and weight, with focus on quality/strength.

    So...update comes as soon as the frame arrive!

  2. #2
    No, that's not phonetic
    Reputation: tscheezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    14,363
    Sounds cool. Also let us know what bike(s) you are coming off of for comparison's sake.
    My video techniques can be found in this thread.

  3. #3
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,604
    Quote Originally Posted by tscheezy
    Sounds cool. Also let us know what bike(s) you are coming off of for comparison's sake.
    +1 to that. I'm jealous. that sounds like a pretty nice build to say the least. I'd go coil rear /36 series fork personally. Even with the coil, it would still be light for what it is...

  4. #4
    What are you looking at?
    Reputation: R1D3R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    951
    The One has 8 inches of travel right? I'd like to know the weight and see a ride report when you're done
    Orange Heckler

    Blue Pinscher

  5. #5
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,604
    Quote Originally Posted by R1D3R
    The One has 8 inches of travel right? I'd like to know the weight and see a ride report when you're done

    The frame is supposedly quite light, and with those specs my guess is just north of 30.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    667
    pls keep us updated, sure sounds like good stuff!!!
    check out great video coverage of anything mtb (well almost).

    http://www.mtbcut.tv

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,579
    very nice sounding build, but I'm wondering if K18s with a 180/160 rotor configuration can handle the braking duties of a bike like this? You're sure to be flying along quite quickly, may want to step it up a size IMO

  8. #8
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    My previous bikes (since back in the 90's):

    - GT Zaskar LE
    - Kona Kula
    - Gekko Warbaby (Norwegian brand)

    Went over to downhill in 2000:

    - Foes Tube DHS
    - SC VPFree

    Trailbike:

    - GT Id5

    Been testing bikes for a local magazine, so've had experience with a ton of different trail, am and freeridebikes the last seasons.

    I have good experience with the power in the K18 - so I'll try the 180/160 combo first, and see how it goes. Not the hardest of upgrades if I need one. :-)

    I've already built this bike in excel, added the weight of all the parts.
    It seems to come in around 14,6kg when calculating with 36 spokes, and I'm building with 32.

    The bike is adjustable between 7" and 8".
    Geo here:

    7inches
    8inches

  9. #9
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    And a small review of the bike can be found here:

    http://www.bikemagic.com/news/article/mps/uan/5990

  10. #10
    Dirt Deviant
    Reputation: savagemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,693
    Thats gonna be sick!! Congrats, and keep us updated.

  11. #11
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwind
    +1 to that. I'm jealous. that sounds like a pretty nice build to say the least. I'd go coil rear /36 series fork personally. Even with the coil, it would still be light for what it is...
    I was actually going for a Fox fork in the beginning, since that's what I've had on my latest bikes (DH40RC2 on my dh, and the Vanilla fork on my trialbike). It would save weight, and I know how to work with them. But pricing and availability here in Norway changed all that.

    Some of the bikes we tested for the local mag last season had the Lyric forks, and being happy with how they worked out on the trail - I went for one.

    3-4 years ago, I wouldn't have a doubt - but 2007 showed that most highend forks currently on the market are damn good ones. They differ in how much run-in is needed, but they all deliver in the end.

  12. #12
    it's the ride....
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by jetmotor
    And a small review of the bike can be found here:

    http://www.bikemagic.com/news/article/mps/uan/5990
    Looks very sweeet... Get her on the trail and we'll hear what you say..

  13. #13
    it's the ride....
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    530
    [double post]
    Last edited by softailteamrider; 03-04-2008 at 08:40 PM.

  14. #14
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by softailteamrider
    Looks very sweeet... Get her on the trail and we'll hear what you say..
    As soon as Canfield are able to ship her over
    Got all the other gear here already.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Slyp Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    454
    I would throw in a vote for the Formula TheOne brakes, 180mm front 160mm rear. I will definitely be watching this build closely. that is one of the bikes I have been drooling over. although I would be very inclined to run a Pushed DHX coil, a CCDB, a Roco coil maybe a Romicor, or if I wanted an air shock, an Evolver ISX6. that, paired up with a '05 Dorado 180 inverted dual crown fork. hey, it's the same weight as most of the 'Zoke 66 series forks are and has the same travel, just triple crown, inverted design, at least $200 cheaper than an '08 66, and imho looks way cooler
    Quote Originally Posted by teamdicky View Post
    My butthole would pucker and invert until I was inside-out before I got to the bottom.

  16. #16
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,604
    Sorry, but the dorados are FUGLY!

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    Very nice! I'm amazed w/ that frame, just 7lbs!

    I've been talking with Chris and Lance, and am about to preorder a Can-Diggle (your bike's bigger brother).

    Looks like a solid build!

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    ignore

  19. #19
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwind
    Sorry, but the dorados are FUGLY!
    Guess that's a matter of opinion.
    Can't stop, Won't stop.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hardtails Are Better's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,298
    Quote Originally Posted by MattP.
    Very nice! I'm amazed w/ that frame, just 7lbs!
    I'm almost positive that's sans shock.

  21. #21
    it's the ride....
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by Slyp Dawg
    I would throw in a vote for the Formula TheOne brakes, 180mm front 160mm rear. I will definitely be watching this build closely. that is one of the bikes I have been drooling over. although I would be very inclined to run a Pushed DHX coil, a CCDB, a Roco coil maybe a Romicor, or if I wanted an air shock, an Evolver ISX6. that, paired up with a '05 Dorado 180 inverted dual crown fork. hey, it's the same weight as most of the 'Zoke 66 series forks are and has the same travel, just triple crown, inverted design, at least $200 cheaper than an '08 66, and imho looks way cooler

    sounds parts spec for a Can-Diggle..

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardtails Are Better
    I'm almost positive that's sans shock.
    Straight from their site:

    "7lbs with Fox 5.0 air"

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hardtails Are Better's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,298
    Quote Originally Posted by MattP.
    Straight from their site:

    "7lbs with Fox 5.0 air"
    Daaammnnn.

  24. #24
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardtails Are Better
    Daaammnnn.
    The Canfield guy told me on another thread, it isn't "as good" as the Candiggle if your going to be doing (repeated) fifteen footers though.
    Can't stop, Won't stop.

  25. #25
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,604
    Quote Originally Posted by blackagness
    Guess that's a matter of opinion.

    Come one BA. Someone who cringes at the sight of a left, is going to stand up for the ascetic qualities of a Dorado?

    I'll admit, it's a matter of opinon, but i don't like upside down forks.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Slyp Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by softailteamrider
    sounds parts spec for a Can-Diggle..
    I prefer the less slack angles the One has compared to the Can-Diggle. but if I was going for a straight up DH or slopestyle rig I'd go for a Can-Diggle. wait, actually I'd probably end up with a Jedi F1 for DH shuttle duties. as for upside down forks being ugly, it's all a matter of opinion. they look real cool on longer travel bikes (Foes 2:1 DHS Mono, or most all DH rigs for that matter), gives them a bit of motocross-bike-ness (yes, it is a word now), and I wouldn't mind running a single crown invert fork on a shorter travel bike (say, a Dorado SC or the older 'Zoke inverted single crown fork paired with a BLT or a Banshee Pyre)

    thread hijack aside, I'm going to be pretty much glued to this thread waiting for a ride report and pictures of the thing
    Quote Originally Posted by teamdicky View Post
    My butthole would pucker and invert until I was inside-out before I got to the bottom.

  27. #27
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by Slyp Dawg
    or the older 'Zoke inverted single crown fork paired with a BLT or a Banshee Pyre)
    Those forks where as stiff as the side walls of a maxxis swampthing.
    You could put the wheel between your legs and turn the handlebars 90degrees. (at least if felt like it)



    But yeah...hijacking aside. I'll post more info as soon as flymybike ships the frame, and I've recieved it.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    I'm SOO stoked on these frames, everyone I've talked to said they are the best pedalling 7-8" bikes period. Straight from Lance over at Canfield in an e-mail:

    "It is the best pedaling frame on the planet. Seriously.
    You can climb in 8" mode- no problem."

  29. #29
    GAME ON!
    Reputation: saturnine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,969
    no reason at all for canfield to say something about their own product that might not be true. i'm sold.
    RIP Adam Yauch

    "M.C. for what I AM and do, the A is for Adam and the lyrics; true"

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,816
    Quote Originally Posted by saturnine
    no reason at all for canfield to say something about their own product that might not be true. i'm sold.
    Sure they are probably just hyping up their frames, but from every single that has posted that has ridden The One, the consensus seems that it pedals amazingly.

  31. #31
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    My box-of-parts are missing their frame...anybody know if Canfield has shipped yet?
    Heard the dealer say the frames would arrive europe in March/April.

  32. #32
    thats right living legend
    Reputation: blackagness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,377
    Quote Originally Posted by jetmotor
    My box-of-parts are missing their frame...anybody know if Canfield has shipped yet?
    Heard the dealer say the frames would arrive europe in March/April.
    Seems like I read mid April yesterday on the DH/FR board?
    Can't stop, Won't stop.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: frisky_zissou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    694
    Quote Originally Posted by MattP.
    Sure they are probably just hyping up their frames, but from every single that has posted that has ridden The One, the consensus seems that it pedals amazingly.
    This is just a thought I have been having lately, why is it that only the botique bikes offer "the best pedalling" or "the best climbing" and so on where I practicly never hear this regarding bigger bikes? I cannot poosibly vouch for this statement as I have never ridden a botique frame or even spent much saddle time on a full suspension (i am a student with no money) but wouldn't you think a company with a much bigger r & d be able to produce some of the best bikes as they have the time money and resources to do so?

    I have nothing really to back up that thought because, thats what it is, a thought.

  34. #34
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by tom2304
    This is just a thought I have been having lately, why is it that only the botique bikes offer "the best pedalling" or "the best climbing" and so on where I practicly never hear this regarding bigger bikes? I cannot poosibly vouch for this statement as I have never ridden a botique frame or even spent much saddle time on a full suspension (i am a student with no money) but wouldn't you think a company with a much bigger r & d be able to produce some of the best bikes as they have the time money and resources to do so?

    I have nothing really to back up that thought because, thats what it is, a thought.
    Both yes and no.
    No doubt companies like Canfield, Brooklyn Machine Works and such has launched some of the best and funniest DH bikes I've ridden....while massive companies like Trek and Kona has launched some of the most boring and worst rides ever being sold as bikes (my opinion).

    Big companies are controlled by stockholders, manager boards and a focus on making most money out of what they have. Of course this has to be balanced with a good R&D, but a lot of times the money that could go to R&D are moved over to marketing - and they work to hype the technology they're using until enough buyers belive the hype.

    Smaller companies are much more dependent on bringing high quality and good service to the market, since they are much more vulnerable. Of course money is still a key factor, but smaller companies that's been around for a while (or grow) usually do so because they have some really bright minds on the team. Many times, these guys used to work for the big companies as well...

  35. #35
    it's the ride....
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    530
    I think jetmotor said it all. On top of that, small company mostly driven by guys who are really passionate about riding (Chris and Lance from Canfield, Dave Turner, .etc), they may be less constrained by bureaucracy of a big company to create what they want.
    I m not saying that big company couldn't do that but set of rules or procedures to follow by them may dilute the idea to change something.

  36. #36
    Mark
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    32
    I would be concerned about the strength of Mavic 521 for this type of build. My friend put a big dent in the side wall of his rear 521. He is quite a heavy rider.. but my gut reaction to your build was that they may not last too long..

    Thats my opinion, you maybe right to choose them.

    Mark.
    Scotland

  37. #37
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Well...the wheels are already built, so I guess I'll have to find out for myself
    The bike will be used for Trail/All Mountain, and I've ridden with "medium-2-soft" rims earlier without problems. Really depends on the tires. On this I will be using a new set that I'm not familiar with...so you might have a point.

    There are some changes to this build though:

    - The 2008 version of the Fox Air DHX has changed the location of the air valve. So it won't fit the frame in its 8" setting.
    - My build will therefor be using a custom built Marzocchi Roco WC with TST R internals (thanks Marzocchi Norway!)

    Canfield said they would ship (finally) this week, so I hope to bring some pictures to this thread soon...

  38. #38
    Mark
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    32
    Ya they will be fine for that sort of riding.

    I am just about to order a Can can with DHX.5 coil! can't wait..

    My build will be similar to yours, light but solid. I've got the Formula Mega brakes - amazing.
    Fork - Totem or Lyric solo air.

    Going back to rims, I will be running Spank Subrosa rims. I can't recommend them enough.. light 580g, gd profile and really solid. well worth a considering in the future.

    I'll post my complete build soon and pics when I get the bike.

    Whats the riding like in Norway?

  39. #39
    fux
    fux is offline
    Scooterist
    Reputation: fux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,211
    Disclaimer. I now sell bicycles and bicycle tyres.

    instacrap ----> http://instagram.com/manx71/

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    521

    According to Chris C

    There were production issues with the Jedi which held up shipping all frames from Taiwan. They should be on a boat to the US this week. It will take four weeks for the boat to get to the US.

    I think I just sqeezed in the time line to get mine air shipped for an additional $100 bucks. Hopefully it will be in the states by the middle of next week April 16-18 i think. I haven't gotten any shipping info as of yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by jetmotor
    My box-of-parts are missing their frame...anybody know if Canfield has shipped yet?
    Heard the dealer say the frames would arrive europe in March/April.

  41. #41
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    The air shipment goes out on monday to SLC and then we will ship right after Sea Otter, the week of the 21st. We where able to get a handful of bikes and there going to long time customers and sponsored riders, getting there bikes this week.

    Come ride this bike, along with the rest of our line up at Sea Otter.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  42. #42
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    You should seriously update your homepage with some new pictures!!
    The pictures you got on there are terrible compared to what this bike looks like


  43. #43
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    Thanks, it's in the process. I fugured everyone would like to see some pictures of the first builds without waiting for us to update the site. We have a new site coming that we will be able to update, should make e-life a bit easier. Back to packing for SeaOtter! See you there!
    BTW the One with Welgo MG-1 flat pedals weighs 31.25lbs!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    703

    Nice bike, nicer dog!

    Great looking bike, but the Boxer is beautiful!
    Does he or she go on rides with you?
    Eric

  45. #45
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    Her name is Mila and yes , she loves to run. She can run on or off leash, directly on my right and knows comands like, right, left, slow, stop, otherway. I'm working on getting her to ride in my BOB trailer so I can take her on longer rides and carrier her on pavement.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    703
    Well done, the smile on her face after a long ride must be amazing. I have a 10 month old Rottie at home, not sure how well he will do but I will give it a shot when his body is mature (need to watch out for hip displasia). My gf and I looked at boxers first but didn't like any of the breeders then we met our Rotties breeder and the *****. Love at first sight!
    Maybe next summer when the Rottie needs a friend we will get a boxer.
    Eric
    Who edited my post. B*tch is the female dog and not a swear word.
    Last edited by rugbyred; 04-15-2008 at 07:51 PM.

  47. #47
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    Amazingly enough, Mila is a pound puppy. We got her at 3 months from the shelter. A pack of 13-14 year old kids thought it was a good idea to get a group dog. When the parents found out, she went from home to home until our friend at the shelter stoped that and gave us a call. She is 2 years now so this will be the first year to really take her on real rides. The hip displasia is part of the reason I want to get her to ride in the trailer.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    703
    She is quite the "pound puppy". Guess the kids had more taste than brains! Too bad the breeder only wanted to make money.
    Great story, would love to see her running trails. I have heard that you should keep an eye on the pads of her paws depending on the terrain you ride. They can get pretty beat up with all the running.
    On the first day that we got the puppy, I had him drinking from my camel back. Only 14 more months to go before he can safely go for a long run.
    Eric

  49. #49
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    No wonder Lance steals my thread...I suck at updating

    But now, finally some progress.
    Some changes to the equipment, but not much.

    The biggest change is the custom Roco TST R, which is a rebuilt Roco WC with the TST R shims (thanks Marzocchi Norway for making this one!).

    The are still some loose ends here:

    - Front brake not attached (need adapter)
    - Rear wire not attached
    - Front wire not even there yet
    - And the chain of course

    But I'm getting there...

    Really happy with this one, and the weight...it feels so light!!
    Looking forward to getting everything on and see what weighs in at...

    Well...picture time (sorry about the quality...compact camera indoors):




















  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,192

    looks stunning

    Everything is coming together really well. Those angles look great also, looks slack enough with that fork at 160 and you have the ability to drop for climbs. Good smart build there. Curious to see if you come in under Lance's 31.25 lbs. I like your build a little more with your suspension choice. Pumped for you man, thanks for keeping is posted and keep sending more info and photos.

  51. #51
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Very curious myself.
    The building came to a halt now, since there isn't room for a dual pull front derailleur under the link. So need to get it replaced with one that's just bottom pull. To bad...the shop was out of XT derailleurs, and gave me an XTR for the same price...but with dual pull...

    But a review will be posted pretty soon (within a week from now I hope!)


  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    162
    Pic of new medium ONE, finally done!
    Attached Images Attached Images

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    162
    Well after a lot of planing and figuring and building, I got my first ride on my bike today. All I can say is WOW! This is the most fun bike I've ridden yet. After a few more rides I'll write up a review. For now I'll give a run down of my build.

    Frameset- medium, Marzocchi Roco Air World Cup and Fox DHX coil w/ PUSH factory tune. I'll switch them depending on conditions.

    Weight- 29.8 lbs WITH Kona Wah-Wah platform pedals!

    Fork- 2008 Fox 36 Talas

    Crank- Shimano XT 24-36/

    Brakeset- Hope m4 203f, 183r, floating rotors

    Handlebars- Truvativ Holzfeller

    Stem- Thomson 50mm

    Seatpost- Thomson masterpiece

    Seat- WTB RocketV SLT

    Drivetrain- XT front, x9 rear derailers and shifters

    Wheelset- DT Swiss 240 hubs, supercomp spokes, Stan's Flow rims Kenda small block 8 tires 2.35

    Heavy wheelset- Chris King HD hubs, Straight gauge spokes, Stan's Flow rims, Kenda 2.5 Sticky tires
    Attached Images Attached Images

  54. #54
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    Jason over at Sicklines just posted a review of the One!

    http://sicklines.com/

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    29.8 lbs WITH Kona Wah-Wah platform pedals!

    WOW an 8 inch sub 30lb bike???????

  56. #56
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    Finally my One is ready as well.
    Had a small test run around in the area for suspension setup and see if everything was working properly.
    And the only thing I can say is that this bike delivers what a lot of other vendors claims that their bikes does.

    My previous bikes has had vpp, horst link, single pivot and idrive - but neither of them had the straight-to-the-rear-wheel power transfer that the One has. The closest must be the vpp when it was in its sweet spot, with a pedal platform shock.

    Really looking forward to riding my favourite trails with this one!

    Weight ended at 31lbs btw.
    But that's with heavy barends, cranks and forks.
    It's easy to get this bike under 30lbs.

    Heading for a ride with a friend of mine next week, and we'll bring a camera

  57. #57
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    And then - first ride today.
    Took it through my favorite trail, to compare it with my now retired iDrive5 - who's helped me through that one hundreds of times.

    And what can I say...
    First; the One can really climb. Seriously!
    Lowering the U Turn forks, and I could point the tire on whatever hill I wanna go up.

    I don't agree with the Canfield brothers in regards of pedal platform though, as the bike felt much more solid on the steep climbs with at least some pedal platform adjustment on the shock. Though not much, and I currently run the Roco at a lower air pressure than recommended for my weight, but only 10psi (which looked more correct in regards of sag).

    When you lift the forks back up, and turn of all pedal platform on the shock - you have a full on FR bike underneath yourself. And here is where this bike really shines. It packs tons of confidence when you're going back down again - and since the angles and the 7" of travel are suddenly there for you, I found myself to be the limit on this first ride, not the bike. It's so steady and solid in high speeds, you just need to test one to belive that you just climbed up these hills on this thing...

    So my conclusion is that I without a doubt feel that I got what I wanted. I was looking for a trailbike that would climb like my iDrive5 did - but would be a bit more fun back down again. The One climbs like my iDrive5 did, but is just awesome back down again. I need nothing more for my type of riding.

    Bullseye!

  58. #58
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103
    I'm glad your liking your One. Sick build!! Post some pics when you get some.
    BTW, sorry for hijacking your thread, I needed to have a picure to look at.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Why not 180mmForks?

    Hi guys!!!

    I'm waiting for my One,as well. And the time I wait I look your pictures trying to discover new stuff for my bike. Actually I have a 66 ATA SL1, it's a air fork no so heavy and with longer travel than Lyric or 36Talas. I would like to know, why people are not using long travel forks when we have buy the longest rear travel bike, for All mountain(enduro).

    Untill it gets home, I'll be waiting for your answers. Then I'll send you some pics and I'll explain you how it works.

    P.D. Sorry for my english I know it's difficult to understand. I should study harder at School.

  60. #60
    Happy Hacker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    46
    This really has a lot to do with what types of riding you want to use this bike for.
    A tall fork, like the one you are looking at using, would make the bike quite tall in the front - making steep climbs difficult.

    I've built myself an AM bike, and based on this - the Lyric looked like a good choice. And based on issues with the 2 step last season ,the Lyric U-Turn was installed.

    On this bike it feels long enough...by far. And the angles are still steep enough to give me good controll in technical low speed areas.

    But if you want to use the bike for more FR aimed riding, a longer fork might be a good option, but then maybe the Can Diggle might be a better frame.

    A long fork would change the angles, lift the front and move your seat further back.
    This might be what you are looking for of course.


  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Replay Jetmotors opinion

    Yes Jetmotor.
    You are barelly right in everithink, but 66 ATA fork can change traver as U-turn in your fork, so like this, I can change geometry for climbing up the hills and then change agaiin for go down hill. The Lyric coil fork is just 50-80 grams lighter than 66 ATA.
    Finally, I'm not interested in FR bikes because I'm not doing hi jumps (notmore than 4 feet)neither hi speeds, just single trucks and technical trial paths where speed rated is about 8-15Mph.
    Well. Thank you for your opinion and suggestions.
    Take care and enjoy your time.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Rear shock setings

    Hi again, I have forgot a question that I think can be interesting.
    I have no Idea about the settings of presure in the differnt chambers of the fox shock.
    My weight is 75Kg or 165lband the Idea is use 8' travel. I'm not doing hi jumps so I prefer softer setings.
    Someone can tels me the differnt presures?
    Thank you
    Good days for riding.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Rear shox settings

    Hellow Guys.

    Fertival, I would like to introduce you my appologise if I did anythink wronk.

    Please, I'm interested in the settings of read shox.

  64. #64
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103

    Fox DHX Coils ProPedal / Boost Valve

    I think this is what your looking for. I'm assuming you have a Fox DHX 5.0 coil. Let me know if you have the DHX air. I got this from the Fox online owners manual. ......

    Boost Valve
    The Boost Valve creates a position-sensitive damping scheme that allows for a seamless transition from efficient ProPedal to square-edge bump absorption to a bottomless end-of-stroke feel. The Boost Valve also decouples the ProPedal and bottom-out adjustments, enabling ProPedal platform adjustments to be made without affecting the changes made to the bottom-out adjustment.

    The Boost Valve is not adjusted directly. Instead, its behavior and performance characteristics are influenced by the air pressure setting in the reservoir and by adjusting the ProPedal knob.

    To change the compression damping characteristics of your DHX 5.0 shock, attach a FOX High Pressure Pump to the air valve on the reservoir:

    For a firmer ride, add 10 - 15 pounds of air pressure (to a maximum of 200 PSI).

    For a softer ride, decrease the shock's air pressure 10 - 15 pounds by using the pump's bleed valve (to a minimum of 125 PSI).

    Ride your bike and verify the settings before repeating the procedure.

    Never ride your bike with more than 200 PSI or less than 125 PSI in the reservoir air chamber.
    Doing so can damage your shock and require repairs that are NOT covered under warranty.

    ProPedal + Boost Valve Interaction
    Certain aspects of the Boost Valve can influence the ProPedal adjustment:

    If the ProPedal adjustment knob is fully counterclockwise (lightest ProPedal damping position) and the compression damping is still too strong, attach a shock pump to the Schrader valve on the reservoir and reduce the pressure 10 - 15 psi. Repeat to achieve the desired compression damping.

    If there is not enough compression damping with the ProPedal knob fully clockwise, add 10 - 15 psi to the Boost Valve until desired compression damping is achieved.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by flymybike
    I think this is what your looking for. I'm assuming you have a Fox DHX 5.0 coil. Let me know if you have the DHX air. I got this from the Fox online owners manual. ......

    Boost Valve
    The Boost Valve creates a position-sensitive damping scheme that allows for a seamless transition from efficient ProPedal to square-edge bump absorption to a bottomless end-of-stroke feel. The Boost Valve also decouples the ProPedal and bottom-out adjustments, enabling ProPedal platform adjustments to be made without affecting the changes made to the bottom-out adjustment.

    The Boost Valve is not adjusted directly. Instead, its behavior and performance characteristics are influenced by the air pressure setting in the reservoir and by adjusting the ProPedal knob.

    To change the compression damping characteristics of your DHX 5.0 shock, attach a FOX High Pressure Pump to the air valve on the reservoir:

    For a firmer ride, add 10 - 15 pounds of air pressure (to a maximum of 200 PSI).

    For a softer ride, decrease the shock's air pressure 10 - 15 pounds by using the pump's bleed valve (to a minimum of 125 PSI).

    Ride your bike and verify the settings before repeating the procedure.

    Never ride your bike with more than 200 PSI or less than 125 PSI in the reservoir air chamber.
    Doing so can damage your shock and require repairs that are NOT covered under warranty.

    ProPedal + Boost Valve Interaction
    Certain aspects of the Boost Valve can influence the ProPedal adjustment:

    If the ProPedal adjustment knob is fully counterclockwise (lightest ProPedal damping position) and the compression damping is still too strong, attach a shock pump to the Schrader valve on the reservoir and reduce the pressure 10 - 15 psi. Repeat to achieve the desired compression damping.

    If there is not enough compression damping with the ProPedal knob fully clockwise, add 10 - 15 psi to the Boost Valve until desired compression damping is achieved.

    Hellow Flymybike.
    Thank you for your atention.
    Following murphi's Lows I ordered my bike with DHX 5 AIR. Because I think there is half kilogram of diference and for my riding style I think is more than enough.
    Do you mind you could repeat the explanation for a DHX 5.0 Air.

    Thanks for your patience and have good ridings.

  66. #66
    Canfield Brothers
    Reputation: flymybike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,103

    DHX Air

    The DHX air is the same as the coil for the boost valve settings. The air spring should be adjusted to have proper sag. Everything else can be adjusted from there.
    Note that the air valve on the 08 models has moved and interfers slightly on bottomout with the upper link when in the 8" travel setting. Be sure to cycle the suspension with no air in the shock to verify clearance at bottomout. The 7" setting (upper mounting hole) can be used without modification. The Fox DHX Air is also a 2.5" stroke so you loose a little travel.

    Heres what Fox has to say about air spring settings:

    Setting Sag
    You can also view a Flash video on Setting Sag.

    To set sag on your DHX Air 5.0:

    Measure sag, and compare it to the recommended sag setting shown in the Air Spring Setting Guidelines table below. Continue if the sag is not to specification.
    Locate the Schrader air valve on the shock and remove the air valve cap.
    Screw the FOX Racing Shox High Pressure Pump onto the air valve until the pump shows pressure on the gauge. Do not over-tighten.
    Add air pressure until desired pressure is shown on the gauge. Refer to the Air Spring Setting Guidelines table below for the proper sag setting.
    Unthread the pump from the air valve and measure sag.
    Repeat steps 2-5 until proper sag is achieved, then replace the air valve cap.

    AIR SPRING SETTING guidelines

    Shock Travel
    (in./mm)
    Sag
    (in./mm)

    2.50/63.5
    .62/15.7

    Here is the site you can find all the Fox info.
    http://www.foxracingshox.com/fox_tech_center/index.htm

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    75
    Anyone running a CCDB on one of these? What are your settings?

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gman086's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,294
    Beautiful bike and build jetmotor! And I have to laugh at the poster asking if the K18's were enough brake! They've obviously never used a Formula brake before. The K18's have the same stopping power as the rest of their brakes (excluding The One), they just didn't get the bells and whistles/ti/carbon hardware. You can upgrade them easily tho - I HIGHLY recommend Bianco lever blades (one finger braking) and the sintered metallic pads (15-20% better stopping power and much better in wet than stock semi-metallic pads). I'm running those on my FR rig now and they'e better than what I have on my M3!

    Have FUN!

    G MAN
    "There's two shuttles, one to the top and one to the hospital" I LOVE this place!!!

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    649
    you'll have better luck posting in the Canfield forum or asking Chris Canfield
    did you notice the thread had been dead a year when you posted to it?

    Quote Originally Posted by erikkellison
    Anyone running a CCDB on one of these? What are your settings?
    2011 Canfield ONE 200mm DH 35 pounds
    2010 Specialized Pitch 100% non stock 29 lbs
    Wife: 2009 Canfield ONE also 29 lbs

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    75
    Yeah, but all the people are still subscribed to this thread. I figured it was worth a shot. Plus, the One that I have is no longer the current version, and this thread is about the "old" One.

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    649
    thanks, I just learned you can tell who's subscribed from
    current version as in not yet in production ?
    my wife has the 09 ONE, I just posted it in the ONE thread in the Canfield forum
    2011 Canfield ONE 200mm DH 35 pounds
    2010 Specialized Pitch 100% non stock 29 lbs
    Wife: 2009 Canfield ONE also 29 lbs

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •