Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 58
  1. #26
    Let the good times roll.
    Reputation: miniwisejosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,158
    I used to have a 50mm stem. Now it's 35mm, and I'm pretty happy with it.

  2. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Scott@GO-RIDE.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,205
    For me there are three things that come into play when deciding on stem length.
    1. Length is obivously based on rider size and how closely the ETT length of your bike matches your body.
    2. The style of riding you prefer. In this case it is All Mountain. For DH/FR I'd go shorter and for XC I'd go longer.
    3. The width of your bars. Generally, wider bars add ot the reach of a bike and require a shorter stem.

    For me 70mm is common for my AM bikes, but I'll go as short as 50 when the TT is unusually long such as with the Yeti SB66 that is 1" longer than many other bikes of the same size. For my DH bikes I've alwasy used 50mm. For my XC bikes I still like it a bit shorter and won't go longer than a 90mm.
    Scott @ GO-RIDE.com
    Turner DHR
    Pivot Mach 6
    Giant Anthem 27.5
    Salsa Bear Grease C
    Lil Shredder 20" - son's

  3. #28
    Wēk Ss
    Reputation: IAmHolland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,516
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott@GO-RIDE.com View Post
    For me there are three things that come into play when deciding on stem length.
    1. Length is obivously based on rider size and how closely the ETT length of your bike matches your body.
    2. The style of riding you prefer. In this case it is All Mountain. For DH/FR I'd go shorter and for XC I'd go longer.
    3. The width of your bars. Generally, wider bars add ot the reach of a bike and require a shorter stem.

    For me 70mm is common for my AM bikes, but I'll go as short as 50 when the TT is unusually long such as with the Yeti SB66 that is 1" longer than many other bikes of the same size. For my DH bikes I've alwasy used 50mm. For my XC bikes I still like it a bit shorter and won't go longer than a 90mm.
    What he said, except I tend to buy my frames now to run around 50, so I would go larger on the frame if I could.

    So, on my 6" AM bike I run a 65mm stem with a 23in ETT and 71 SA. My 5" Trail bike, I run a 40mm stem with a 24in ETT and 72 SA. My AM HT, I run a 50mm stem with a 23.5in ETT with a 72 SA. All have 780mm bars. My trail bike is my latest addition, I like the fit so far with a bit more reach. It depends on the reach measurement, which is affected by the seat angle and the ETT.

  4. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    461
    My AM bike is currently running 75mm x 690mm but I've wanted to change it all summer ( I need to get a new fork to run a shorter stem, maverick duc). I am planning on going 45-50x715. I have been riding my gf's downhill bike (knolly delirium) as a trail bike the last couple weeks and I have loved the attitude of the short front end.

    I think the word "twitchy" has a negative conotation to it and isn't accurate. First of all, I dont steer by turning the handle bars, I turn by leaning the bike over and that is much easier with wider bars. I have found that the quickness of the short stem allows for split second manuevers to avoid obstacles while maintaining my overall desired path of direction. These types of manuevers simply aren't feasible with a longer stem. If you have fast reflexes, this will definitely benefit your ride.

    I havent had any problem keeping the front end down on climbs...I normally climb standing up so I just keep my shoulders over the stem and it is plenty well weighted. A benefit of the light front end is that it's easy to keep the bike in a nearly lofted position while riding making it much easier to place the front end where you want it over rocks/roots etc. A little pedal jab is all it takes to get the front end up and over and put it down where i want it.

  5. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    46
    double post

  6. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    46


  7. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MTBerNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    202
    I just slapped on a 50mm stem and some 760mm bars. They are WIDE, im going to chop them down to 700.

  8. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    591
    Good thread. Replaced my 110 with an 80. I have a long reach, and the 30 mm difference makes the bike feel WAY better. Probably could have gone with a 60 or 70...
    Last edited by trmn8er; 12-29-2012 at 09:58 PM.

  9. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    162
    So I'm running 685mm with a 70 mm stem now. Going to try 730mm and 50mm and see if I like it. Going with something similar on my DH rig, maybe 750. I've seen the 820mm's as think, Way to drastic of a change in one leap for me.

    Are their limits for bar width in Enduro racing? It was 29 7/8" when I was racing BMX as a kid. (or, under 30" if I remember correctly)

  10. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    461
    Hey Nick,

    Don't chop them down to 700 right away. I would do it in increments. Maybe go 740 then 720 etc to see what you like. For my size (5'7") i am finding the sweet spot to be at 715 or so

  11. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    123
    Planning to go with either a 750 or 711 mm bar, with a 50-65mm stem. Coming from a 620/90, is this too much or will I get used to it eventually?

  12. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    664
    When changing bar size and you don't know what you're going to like yet

    - Get something wider then you think you need
    - Use lock on grips. Start with the grips/controls at the ends of the bars and get at least a few hours of riding in on that setup, making sure to tackle a mix of terrain: wide open high speed, narrow and technical, and super chunder.
    - If it feels too wide, bring the grips in 5mm in on each side and retest.
    - Repeat as necessary.
    - Once you find the right width, cut the bars down.

  13. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    123
    Good tip gurp, thanks. Already have a lock on grip so that takes care of one thing. Just need to find out if cutting a havoc carbon bar will void its warranty.

  14. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    17
    mtngt, it won't, the havoc carbon actually has cut marks up to 710mm.

  15. #40
    Grams Light Bikes
    Reputation: pastajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,272

    Good job!

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott@GO-RIDE.com View Post
    For me there are three things that come into play when deciding on stem length.
    1. Length is obivously based on rider size and how closely the ETT length of your bike matches your body.
    2. The style of riding you prefer. In this case it is All Mountain. For DH/FR I'd go shorter and for XC I'd go longer.
    3. The width of your bars. Generally, wider bars add ot the reach of a bike and require a shorter stem.

    For me 70mm is common for my AM bikes, but I'll go as short as 50 when the TT is unusually long such as with the Yeti SB66 that is 1" longer than many other bikes of the same size. For my DH bikes I've alwasy used 50mm. For my XC bikes I still like it a bit shorter and won't go longer than a 90mm.
    Wow, brilliant stuff, getting tired of the 'you have to go with 50 for a modern bike' attitude. I like 80 on my med Mojo HD, I am 5'9" and like the slight reach. Yes, I have played with stem, bars, headset stack, forks, shocks, angleset, etc., and always come back to my comfortable 80 (for me), and I ride everything, from sick steep XC trails on the HD.

  16. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ATXZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    366
    I have a long torso and arms and have been running a longer stem which sucks on an AM rig. I yanked the 120x680 stem and bars and added a 60x765 and couldn't be happier.

    SC:12' Butcher (sold)
    SC:12' Superlight 29er (sold)
    SC:12' Juliana (wife's)
    SC:12' TBLT

  17. #42
    GAME ON!
    Reputation: saturnine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,971
    i alternate between 50/711 and 70/711. i'm not sure which i prefer.
    RIP Adam Yauch

    "M.C. for what I AM and do, the A is for Adam and the lyrics; true"

  18. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    71
    I had a 24" x 110 setup on my xc bike, it felt awful! then I switched to a 26x90, it felt awful! (a little better).
    So I went back to my AM bike with the 70mm stem and 670mm bars, and it feels good, but my weight is too far back and it washes out on flatter turns.
    So I ordered a new 70mm stem and 740mm bars and I'm gonna throw the 670/70 combo on my DJ bike.

    Wider feels better! but the biggest factor is still bike-fit IMO.

    oh yeah, and the XC bike is put away for good. lol

  19. #44
    attending to my vices
    Reputation: moshelove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    463
    I'm 6'1" on a medium reign. A little short for me. I've been running 680mm bars and a 60mm stem forever. 70mm have up too much on the DH control.

    I recently got a pair of 745mm bars and moved down 10mm to a 50mm stem. The difference in control was astounding.

    I achieved basically the same reach forward, but have moved the weight distribution farther behind the front axle. The improvement in control is so much better, that I was able to drop tire size and still have the same if not better steering control. All while having a much faster rolling bike.

    Wider bar and shorter stem has been by far the biggest improvement since a KSi900 remote and a fox 36.

    Going into corners now with so much more confidence. Just setting the line and letting the bike do all the work. Huge leverage advantage. I will never go back to narrower bars and or compromise descending confidence and control with a longer stem. A must try for everyone with a longer stem.


    If you need anything I'm Fabian, if not, I'm Dale
    .
    OVER THE LINE SMOKEY!

  20. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripes View Post
    Yes, but run wider bars too.
    Shorter stem = twitchier handling
    Longer stem = slower handling

    Wide bar = slower handling
    Narrow bar = twitchier handling

    So make sure it balances out. For me, 29" bars and 50mm stems seem to be the magic number on all my bikes.
    I agree, the trick on this is finding the combination of these 2 lengths. Another important factor is the sizing of the bike and how it feels. If its a bit too long, you def have to go with a shorter stem, if too short, maybe a longer stem. Either or, the majority (me included) are running 50-60mm stems with 720-750mm bars. Seems to fit most of us out there.

  21. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    162
    So I wound up with a 45mm stem and 800mm Enve carbon bars on my AM and it is absolutely the best improvement I've made. The steering is more precise and the stability on DH is just awesome. The extra leverage you gain helps with bunny-hopping over obstacles and jumping, it feels like a big BMX bike now! With bars that wide and a short stem, it still climbs the steep stuff just as well, to my surprise.
    They also have a 9 degree backsweep so your wrists are in a better position for that width. Now, I've seen a few sections of trail that I have to slow down a bit to avoid hitting branches, but the trade off is worth it. The fun-factor gained from this improvement is priceless.

    I put this same set up on my AM and DH bikes and couldn't be more pleased.

  22. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    31
    My idea is to switch to XC riding using my reign xs...

    Im using 50mm atlas with 30inch race face am bar! works with the seat up, However, not what Im looking for in general when XC'ing.

    Ive decided to go with a flat bar and a Salsa promoto 2 110 -25 degree. This brings about a great expansion for xc riding. However, you always have to switch out the bar/stem combo whenever going to the riding area! not a problem I think!

  23. #48
    PA Biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    28
    740mm wide riser var with a 70mm zero rise stem. Feels good to me so far.

  24. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tiltedworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    36
    I just made this transition as well going from stock 690mm/70mm combo to an Answer Carbon Protaper 720mm/ Answer DJ 50mm stem combo.

    I read this article in prior to purchase that helped me decide on a ratio Mountain Bike Handlebars: The Width Issue - BikeRadar

    I am loving the combo so far - more control on the downhills and no ill-effects on the climbs. If anything I think the slightly shorter cockpit is helping my climbing because I seem to keep my arms bent more and gets my upper body in a better climbing position.

    I liked the combo so much I swapped my old 690mm/70mm combo onto my wifes bike (who is a rank beginner) which had a 620mm/90mm combo and she immediately felt better and more confident / in control in all situations.

  25. #50
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,443
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwind View Post
    I'm a fan of a bigger frame for stability in the chunk and short wide bars. 750mm/45mm I'd go wider if I didn't start to wack stuff.
    Update! 820 bars! Even better!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •