Results 1 to 67 of 67

Thread: AM or XC?

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: B1KER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,127

    AM or XC?

    Can someone please explain the difference to me?
    </robert> ::: B1KER.com - Be One

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Are you taking the piss?
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k
    Can someone please explain the difference to me?

    Yeah I was wondering the same thing. I have been out of the loop for to long I guess....

  4. #4
    Hi!!!
    Reputation: BelaySlave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,544
    All-Mountain is much more fun than Cross Country!!! That's the only difference you need to know.

    ALL-MOUNTAIN!!!!!!
    Idaho Biking Yahoo! Group
    Support these shops: www.CustomMtnCycles.com & Reed's Cycle

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,545
    Ok, for those who really interested and still confused, here is explanation:

    AM = http://forums.mtbr.com/all-mountain/
    XC = http://forums.mtbr.com/xc-racing-training/

    As you can see it's realy easy to get confused, they are pretty much the same except 115 vs. 59, go figure.

    For those who still can't feel the difference, please look for more details here:
    http://forums.mtbr.com/beginners-corner/

    Happy riding.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: natebyrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    206
    xc(cross country) you generally go from point a to point b as fast as you can.
    xc bikes are usually hardtails (front suspension only) with 3-4 inches travel or full suspenion (suspenision front and back) with 3-4 inches of travel front and rear.

    am(all mountain) you ride more technical trails, go of jumps, and drops.
    am bikes are usualy full suspension with around 6 inches of travel btu some have hard tails too

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,545
    If someone curious about equipment, then please follow these links:

    XC = http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.ph...94517#poststop
    AM = Mean All-Mountain Bigots!

  8. #8
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    "All mountain is heavy duty cross country.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    174

    ... and if we just ... It's all in the legs...

    AM = hairy, unshaved legs that will take you to the top of the hill and back down again.

    XC = silky smooth shaved legs that will take you to the top of the hill and back down again.


  10. #10
    -> SickLines.com <-
    Reputation: mtb_biker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,213
    The trails that you ride on an AM bike are usually very similar to a XC bike but more playing around usually and more about the fun of riding moreso than racing/training.

    AM bikes have more travel, slacker geometry, heavier bikes, little burlier depending on the finesse of the ride. They're like a lay-z-boy...

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    20
    All Mountain means you would rather yeild to the guy coming down the hill instead of the guy coming up the hill or maybe that's just me.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,040
    ALL-Mountain is for guys who don't have the balls for freeriding or the fitness for xc.

    JUST KIDDING!

    Hard to draw a line-xc bikers, bikes and trails have really pushed the limits over the last few years--The Hairiest downhill portions of South Mountain in AZ seem to me to be more than xc--is this the heart of All-mountain?? Though, xc skills are pretty handy getting up to National, now aren't they.

    The confusion between xc/all-mountain and the sometime rancor of definition is in part due to the fact that there are two sources of ALL_MOUNTAIN categorization. The Bike Industry defining a product line and actual Mountain Bikers defining their type of riding.

    The Industry seems to want to put a hard-line, equipment based definition on All-mountain (for reasons that need no elaboration), All mountain riders know that regardless of type of bike used, they seem to be engaging in something slightly divergent from the biking ethos of their hard core racing buddies.

    That's my take anyway.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Just seems to me these days that XC is all about superlightweight bikes and racing. I know there is a recreational side to XC too, but a lot of these guys are all about speed and punishing themselves too I know, I have a few friends like that and I rarely ride with them anymore.

    I see AM as being less speed and more fun oriented. Most trails I ride would be fine on a lightweight XC race bike, often quicker overall, but harder work and ultimately less fun (or should I say MY definition of fun). So I ride a sturdy 6x6 AM trailbike and have loads of fun, no racing, no trying to beat anyone. The group I ride with think the same way and ride similar bikes.
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  14. #14
    Monkey
    Reputation: Jozz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    243
    What about those who go as fast as possible for as long as possible, but also stop to try technical sections over and over and over... with a good portions of jumps, drops, bridges, steep chutes and drop offs....

    Would that make us All Mountain XC'ers??

    As Nat from IMBA once told me... its all mountain biking.

  15. #15
    Hi!!!
    Reputation: BelaySlave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,544
    You have to live All-Mountain to truly understand it's definition.
    Idaho Biking Yahoo! Group
    Support these shops: www.CustomMtnCycles.com & Reed's Cycle

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jugdish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Jozz
    What about those who go as fast as possible for as long as possible, but also stop to try technical sections over and over and over... with a good portions of jumps, drops, bridges, steep chutes and drop offs....

    .
    That's just crazy talk! What do you take two or three bikes with you to accomplish that?! Crazy talk I says!
    Gone are the days we stopped to decide,
    Where we should go,
    We just ride...

  17. #17
    Motion activated
    Reputation: Steve71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,236
    Weeeee I'm having so much fun.......
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Happiness is a warm 2 stroke.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Mongol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperbMan
    ALL-Mountain is for guys who don't have the balls for freeriding or the fitness for xc.

    That defines me pretty well!!

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: B1KER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,127
    So let's paraphrase:

    XC:

    • Shaves legs

    • Less then 6" ... (travel)

    • Little nuts
    • Weight Weenie

    • Training for racing

    • Speed/time concious

    • Thinks about things like Cadence

    • Drinks water in the parking lot



    AM:
    • Hairy Legs

    • Heavy bikes

    • At least 6" ... (travel)

    • All Balls

    • 3 1/2 hours for 12 mi....who gives a sh1t

    • Riding so they can drink more beer w/o gaining weight

    • Thinks about things like that chick that just rode by

    • Drinks beer in the parking lot



    Jk...on a serious note I think I get it. Seems like XC guys are more in the "lifestyle" and are training, concerned about weight and speed. Therefore super technical stuff doesn't really fit in. Nor does the heavy bike that makes the ride comfy. The AM guys are out just for a good time...to ride. Who cares how heavy your bike is or how long it takes to get to the top cuz your just out to have a good time. I guess I fall into the AM range. I think about speed and getting in shape but for no reason other than for me. I could care less about winning a race. I just want to have fun and hang out with cool people. If my new handlebars are heavier then the ones I have now, but are more comfortable...who cares. I guess I will get stronger going up the hill now, or on a positve note, I will go faster down the hill now that I weigh more!
    </robert> ::: B1KER.com - Be One

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,545
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k
    AM:
    • Hairy Legs

    • Heavy bikes

    • At least 6" ... (travel)

    • All Balls

    • 3 1/2 hours for 12 mi....who gives a sh1t

    • Riding so they can drink more beer w/o gaining weight

    • Thinks about things like that chick that just rode by

    • Drinks beer in the parking lot
    At first I took your question as troll went for fishing, especially after all ugly discussions on the same subject that flooded this forums. But now I'm quite impress, this is the best list to define AM I have seen, and no kidding here.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    12,079
    All Mountain describes a bike ride that includes usually some X/C riding and usually some steep climbs and descents up and down all or most of a MOUNTAIN and not usaually on a road ( this eliminates TDF mountain stage)

    X/C describes a bike ride that includes some flats, hills and some climbs and decents, not normally including a large chunk of a mountain often in a timed race seting.

    Some bikes are better suited to one or the other styles of riding, and hence pick up that designation.

    I like riding my X/C bike on All Mountain rides because it is easier to push up the steep sections and still has enough frame stength and squish to take the ride down.

    Apologies to those who ride All Mountain when ther are not in the mountians??

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    12,079
    I thought an AM pipe was a steep trail with High sides going down a mountain.

    So what do I know?

  23. #23
    Where is my mind?
    Reputation: Cyclopod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,130
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k
    So let's paraphrase:

    XC:

    • Shaves legs

    • Less then 6" ... (travel)

    • Little nuts
    • Weight Weenie

    • Training for racing

    • Speed/time concious

    • Thinks about things like Cadence

    • Drinks water in the parking lot



    AM:
    • Hairy Legs

    • Heavy bikes

    • At least 6" ... (travel)

    • All Balls

    • 3 1/2 hours for 12 mi....who gives a sh1t

    • Riding so they can drink more beer w/o gaining weight

    • Thinks about things like that chick that just rode by

    • Drinks beer in the parking lot



    Jk...on a serious note I think I get it. Seems like XC guys are more in the "lifestyle" and are training, concerned about weight and speed. Therefore super technical stuff doesn't really fit in. Nor does the heavy bike that makes the ride comfy. The AM guys are out just for a good time...to ride. Who cares how heavy your bike is or how long it takes to get to the top cuz your just out to have a good time. I guess I fall into the AM range. I think about speed and getting in shape but for no reason other than for me. I could care less about winning a race. I just want to have fun and hang out with cool people. If my new handlebars are heavier then the ones I have now, but are more comfortable...who cares. I guess I will get stronger going up the hill now, or on a positve note, I will go faster down the hill now that I weigh more!

    I thought XC was 4 inches of travel. For example Blur XC and Titus RacerX
    "'I refuse to prove that I exist,' says god, 'for proof denies faith and without faith I am nothing'"

    - Douglas Adams: "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"

  24. #24
    Don't Stop Spinnin'!
    Reputation: ReD_tomato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    663
    ok, everyone talks about how XC is less dangerous, and how AM requires bigger BALLS but that really isnt the case, because when you hit the trails, they are not categorized as "Cross Country" or "All Mountain". Both type riders hit the same exact trail while still hitting every curb, climb, and drop... The only difference is that XC involves a state of mind that makes you worry about Time, Endurance, weight, Bike weight, and eating/drinking habbits, but thats only so you could ride better/faster next time over than the last. All Mountain has to come accross the same exact climb, drop... just that they like to "get more air" and perfect that more extreme part of the trail by doing over, and over without worrying about "time" "endurance" and things of that nature.

    So, the differences really dont have to do with how you look, or ride because in the long run every XC'er just halled ass by where that AM'er keeps on busting his ass over and over. Its just the way you practice, and worry about... whether it's " I gotta beat yesterdays time" or "oh ****, i landed that better than i did last week"

    This could all be just my opinion, but thats how i personally see a difference.

  25. #25
    large member
    Reputation: mud'n'sweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,845
    I can answer this thread in two pictures

    AM Rider=

    XC Rider=
    Last edited by mud'n'sweat; 07-21-2006 at 04:42 PM.

  26. #26
    Don't Stop Spinnin'!
    Reputation: ReD_tomato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    663
    wow...

  27. #27
    large member
    Reputation: mud'n'sweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,845
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD_tomato
    wow...
    Calm down sparky, it was a joke. Stick around more than a post or two and you just may get it.

  28. #28
    Don't Stop Spinnin'!
    Reputation: ReD_tomato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    663
    Quote Originally Posted by mud'n'sweat
    Calm down sparky, it was a joke. Stick around more than a post or two and you just may get it.
    joke? ha, ha... it was actually funnier when you had posted a pic of your nerdy self holding a MountainDew bottle... as "ALL MOUNTAIN" but then you edited and posted poor Yoda...

  29. #29
    large member
    Reputation: mud'n'sweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,845
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD_tomato
    joke? ha, ha... it was actually funnier when you had posted a pic of your nerdy self holding a MountainDew bottle... as "ALL MOUNTAIN" but then you edited and posted poor Yoda...
    The kid holding the dew was huge. Yoda worked better

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: starship303's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD_tomato
    ok, everyone talks about how XC is less dangerous, and how AM requires bigger BALLS but that really isnt the case, because when you hit the trails, they are not categorized as "Cross Country" or "All Mountain". Both type riders hit the same exact trail while still hitting every curb, climb, and drop... The only difference is that XC involves a state of mind that makes you worry about Time, Endurance, weight, Bike weight, and eating/drinking habbits, but thats only so you could ride better/faster next time over than the last. All Mountain has to come accross the same exact climb, drop... just that they like to "get more air" and perfect that more extreme part of the trail by doing over, and over without worrying about "time" "endurance" and things of that nature.

    So, the differences really dont have to do with how you look, or ride because in the long run every XC'er just halled ass by where that AM'er keeps on busting his ass over and over. Its just the way you practice, and worry about... whether it's " I gotta beat yesterdays time" or "oh ****, i landed that better than i did last week"

    This could all be just my opinion, but thats how i personally see a difference.
    Yep, thats more or less nailed it i recon. Its not to say XC isn't fun, it is, but there are many many more factors too. To simplify it:

    XC = efficiency in (funnily enough) crossing country on a bike.
    AM = more thrill/freedom seeking and much less competative.

    Having said that, when i started riding years ago there were really only two defined categories purely based on bike types and racing formats - XC and DH. Anything in between was just plain old mountain bike riding. Thats still the way i see it to this day (although 'freeriding' is somewhat specialised now i guess) and i personally try to dismiss all these marketing segmentations and just ride.

    As for XC'er not having balls thats just... well... balls. I've been to a number of races and seen guys with little protection decend pretty bloody technical sections at very fast pace only to then punish themselves on the uphill sections, all in the name of efficiency. Doing that for a few hours non-stop, IMO, takes balls and serious dedication.

    My 2c.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    176
    where would you guys put these two bikes

    06 specialized fsr stumpjumper
    06 santa cruz heckler

    just curious
    Last edited by Jordansrealm; 07-21-2006 at 10:43 PM.

  32. #32
    Fiddle Sticks!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Jordansrealm
    where would you guys put these two bikes

    06 specialized fsr stumpjumper
    06 santa cruz heckler

    just curious
    stumpjumper-xc
    heckler- AM
    "We must learn to live together as brothers, or perish together as fools."
    - Martin Luther King Jr.

  33. #33
    My bikes hate me!
    Reputation: cranberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    265
    All Mountain = XC with medium sized hucks.
    Intensecycles
    Easternbikes
    Quote Originally Posted by .WestCoastHucker.
    now, go dig a giant hole and bury your dumb ass in it....

  34. #34
    I already rode that
    Reputation: SuperNewb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,633
    AM is XC
    AM was thought up of cause some punk didnt like being tossed in XC and getting associated with wearing lycra. Then some marketer said it was the latest cool thing and bike companies jumped in and so did riders.

    Just ride your bike and who cares what other ppl call it.
    Riding F/S since oct 94'

  35. #35
    large member
    Reputation: mud'n'sweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,845
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperNewb
    AM is XC
    AM was thought up of cause some punk didnt like being tossed in XC and getting associated with wearing lycra. Then some marketer said it was the latest cool thing and bike companies jumped in and so did riders.

    Just ride your bike and who cares what other ppl call it.
    exactly!

  36. #36
    Oh, So Interesting!
    Reputation: davec113's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    4,334
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD_tomato
    Both type riders hit the same exact trail while still hitting every curb, climb, and drop...
    I would disagree... most xcers don't seek out technically challenging trails. Also, I've seen hordes of lycra-clad xcers carrying their bikes up and down tech sections... I don't ride everything I see, but the attitude is to improve my skills so that I eventually can. Xcers don't practice jumping, dropping, tech riding, etc... and I don't see them on trails I like to ride much.

    Yes it is just mtbing, with more emphasis on bike skills and adventure than racing or physical conditioning.
    .




    Strava: turn off your dork logger when you're not on sanctioned trails.

  37. #37
    My bikes hate me!
    Reputation: cranberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperNewb
    AM is XC
    AM was thought up of cause some punk didnt like being tossed in XC and getting associated with wearing lycra. Then some marketer said it was the latest cool thing and bike companies jumped in and so did riders.

    Just ride your bike and who cares what other ppl call it.
    When I see XC riders do'n med. sized drops (3-4 feet) and small gaps (6-10 feet) I'll call myself an XC rider. Until then I'll consider myself an all mountain rider. If you get off to walk the section or take the bypass trail, that is NOT all mountain. That's SOME of the mountain.
    Intensecycles
    Easternbikes
    Quote Originally Posted by .WestCoastHucker.
    now, go dig a giant hole and bury your dumb ass in it....

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by cranberry
    When I see XC riders do'n med. sized drops (3-4 feet) and small gaps (6-10 feet) I'll call myself an XC rider. Until then I'll consider myself an all mountain rider. If you get off to walk the section or take the bypass trail, that is NOT all mountain. That's SOME of the mountain.
    the day i see a guy with an all-mountain bike do'n med. sized drops (3-4 feet) and small gaps (6-10 feet) i'll call him an all mountain rider. and if he couldn't clean the uphill in the first place because the bike can't climb worth ****, he isn't doing any of the mountain. the day i see a shuttle picture in here i'll know this forum is totally pointless.

    all joking aside, i'm not really being serious here since my next bike will be considered all-mountain (banshee pyre), but here in southern alberta xc rigs and all-mountain rigs do mostly the same trails. and for that matter, so do horses and hikers. i think it all boils down to what you want out of your ride to make you happy.

    (edited for clarification)
    Last edited by xcolin; 07-23-2006 at 04:40 PM. Reason: clarification

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    When I was riding a HT and 23 lb 3" FS with steep geometry a few years back, scaring myself crawling down rocky descents and small drops, I considered myself an XC rider (although I never wore lycra). Now I ride a 33 lb 6x6" FS and attack the descents, small drops and jumps with a big smile across my face, I consider myself more an AM rider

    AM is not all about marketing. All the other categories, including XC, are heavily marketed too. The only difference with AM is that it's newer. There were no 6x6" lightweight trailbikes to market a few years ago. I'd go as far as saying that AM will become the most popular riding/bike category over the coming years. XC is more for racers and those who prefer to keep their wheels firmly on the ground. FR/DH is for the hardcore uplift junkies. Which leaves AM for the average non-competitive trail riders, looking to have fun and improve their technical skills on a wide variety of trails.

    I first realized there was a real difference between AM and XC when I started riding with a different group a couple of years ago. The group I used to ride with were pure XC. Weight and speed meant everything and they all judged their performance based on climbing ability rather than downhill speed. They were all super fit, but none of them (including myself) were particularly good on technical sections, not helped by the compromise in bike choice. Then I met up with the group I now ride with, who are most definitely AM. They ride slightly heavier, longer travel bikes (dare I say AM bikes). They are much better technical riders (which has rubbed off a little on myself). Overall speed is less important than having fun. Technical climbs are still considered a worthy challenge, but the main reason for going up is to blast back down as fast as possible, taking in whatever drops and jumps might be along the way. I think it's quite a different way of riding personally and I wouldn't call it pure XC.

    As a final point it's worth noting that XC riders tend to ride the exact same trails as AM riders, but with a very different attitude and choice of rig!
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  40. #40
    bg.
    bg. is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bg.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    214
    So, if you're a lycra wearing dude on a 3 inch travel race bike and you occasionally lower your seat and hit doubles with the bike you're an AM rider? Didn't think so.

    AM is about the bike and the look. XC riders have been stopping and sessioning sections for years and years, the only difference now is that there are specific bikes you can buy that are better at the stunts and are light enough for trail riding. It's the equipment that's changed and given us an easier way to identify different rider preferences.

    Labeling someone as an XC rider only just cus he hasn't changed his bike in 3 years is silly. Wait and see how the guy <b>rides</b>. IMO, everyone is riding XC when they're climbing the trails instead of taking the chairlift.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Quote Originally Posted by bg.
    So, if you're a lycra wearing dude on a 3 inch travel race bike and you occasionally lower your seat and hit doubles with the bike you're an AM rider? Didn't think so.

    AM is about the bike and the look. XC riders have been stopping and sessioning sections for years and years, the only difference now is that there are specific bikes you can buy that are better at the stunts and are light enough for trail riding. It's the equipment that's changed and given us an easier way to identify different rider preferences.

    Labeling someone as an XC rider only just cus he hasn't changed his bike in 3 years is silly. Wait and see how the guy <b>rides</b>. IMO, everyone is riding XC when they're climbing the trails instead of taking the chairlift.
    AM is about riding style and general attitude to riding. The bike and look just tend to follow along, complementing this attitude.
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    27
    AM is also about the type of trail you ride, which is also partially a regional thing. Example: a buddy of mine rode an Ellsworth Id which was perfectly matched for our local rocky, rooty technical New England trails. Then he moved to the Bay Area and found that his 30 lb, 5 inch travel bike was not well matched for most of the trails nearest to him, where he was doing lots of big climbs on very smooth trails. So he sold the Id and got a lighter weight, lower travel bike. It's not that his "attitude toward riding" changed, or that he decided to suddenly turn into an "XC rider" -- it was just a matter of picking the right bike for the conditions. An AM bike is all about the design compromises between weight, strength and travel -- if the riding conditions don't demand the strength or travel, then carrying the extra weight is pointless. Similarly, if your local trails are the North Shore, you're probably going to ride a "freeride" bike -- not because you woke up one day and decided to be a "freerider", but because that's the bike best suited for the conditions. Of course if you have a variety of trail types near you, then (lucky you) you can pick what you want to ride based on the "style" of riding you prefer. But in my area, where smooth, easy trails are the exception rather than the rule, AM riding is just riding and AM bikes are just the bikes that work best on the local trails, unless you're actually trying to win an XC race, in which case you ride an XC race bike and just accept getting beat up on the rough stuff as part of the package. Many of the XC racers I know have (at least) two bikes and ride an AM type bike "for fun" and save the XC bike for race day.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: B1KER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,127
    Quote Originally Posted by jk99
    Then he moved to the Bay Area and found that his 30 lb, 5 inch travel bike was not well matched for most of the trails nearest to him, where he was doing lots of big climbs on very smooth trails.
    I'm sure some other Bay Area people can chime in here...but if he is riding big climbs on very smooth trails that is by choice. I used to live in PA and the rocky climbs and decents out here are more of a challenge to me then what I experienced back home. However I am pushing to ride harder trails out here. I'm sure there are a lot of technical trails back there that require an "AM" bike, however, I don't think it's safe to say that because you live in area X you will need a certain type of bike. People need the bike to fit thier style of riding, not so much the trails. I'm sure I could take an XC bike on some downhill trails up at the ski resorts. Whether or not it would get broken would depend on how hard I rode the bike and whether or not I was walking all kinds of drops etc.
    </robert> ::: B1KER.com - Be One

  44. #44
    ccm
    ccm is online now
    West Coast Racing
    Reputation: ccm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by jk99
    AM is also about the type of trail you ride, which is also partially a regional thing. ....... Similarly, if your local trails are the North Shore, you're probably going to ride a "freeride" bike -- not because you woke up one day and decided to be a "freerider", but because that's the bike best suited for the conditions. .....
    Here at the North Shore we have XC races using the same downhill trails that DH racers train on and Freeriders shuttle to. For the BC marathon series and local North Shore races 4ish"X4ish" travel dualies under 27lbs are most common (such as SC Blur, Kona Kikapu, and Rocky Mtn Element (more than ETSX at least on the podium)). So although I don't like to admit it, I guess there is a difference between XC and AM (its not the trail that is different, but the clothing and atitude ). It could also be that XC'ers go faster downhill (speed is number one), but the AM'ers choose the bigger hucks (style is number one), though its not a matter that the biggest hucker has the bigger balls, since I know some non-armoured XC girls who are fast on the tech trails and cause shrinkage in the baggy shorts'ers that they catch.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8
    Real AM men shower every 3 days, have beards(and all other bodily hair), and aren't cocky like XC riders.

    Basically we look like we live on the mountain we love to ride.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chruby99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    399

    I think it describes the bike more than the style of riding.

    Look at the guy riding the 1986 Cunningham in this thread. He smoked most of the competition on the DH riding on an old school fully rigid HT
    Keysville Pics

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    86
    I think it has less to do with a riders skill than the type of line taken through a given section. The XC rider will generally take the fastest (most efficient) line through a section of trail, while the AM rider will generally take the most fun line. The XC rider may have as good or better bike handling skills as the AM rider, and the AM rider may have be as fit as or more fit than the XC rider.
    In my opinion XC riders should strive to have trials like bike handling skills, and AM riders should understand how to find fast lines. A well rounded rider is a better rider, no matter what label you choose.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jugdish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,269
    Quote Originally Posted by ccm
    It could also be that XC'ers go faster downhill (speed is number one), but the AM'ers choose the bigger hucks (style is number one), though its not a matter that the biggest hucker has the bigger balls, since I know some non-armoured XC girls who are fast on the tech trails and cause shrinkage in the baggy shorts'ers that they catch.
    So who has better bike handling skills? The rider who needs 3 b!tch runs to figure out a line or the guy who floats it in transition with speed?
    Gone are the days we stopped to decide,
    Where we should go,
    We just ride...

  49. #49
    ccm
    ccm is online now
    West Coast Racing
    Reputation: ccm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by jugdish
    So who has better bike handling skills? The rider who needs 3 b!tch runs to figure out a line or the guy who floats it in transition with speed?
    Your question isn't clear.
    The freeriders tend to session the bigger stunts over and over until they get them, whereas the racers (either XC or DH) look for the route that maintains speed. Therefore different skills, and as for which bike handling skills are better, there never will be any agreement

  50. #50
    ccm
    ccm is online now
    West Coast Racing
    Reputation: ccm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k
    Can someone please explain the difference to me?
    It can mean what ever you want it to be. I see that there are two ends of a scale that it can fit between. One end of the scale being RACE the other end being STYLE

    RACE ------------------------- STYLE
    XC and DH --------------------------- Freeride & Dirt Jump
    stop watch -----------------------------judging (or at least fashion police)
    bmx racing -----------------------------bmx half pipe and street
    olympics --------------------------------x games
    testing of human bladder for drugs (if present bad)-----------testing of camelbak for drugs (if present good)

    training -----------------------------------what ever!
    weight training and cross training----------just ride or regularily check magazines and videos for latest stunts

    faster lines --------------------------------bigger hucks
    air time - long and low (or none if faster) ----------------air time - big and high

    jerseys look like billboards --------------jerseys plain and chromophobic (although some have cool original artwork)



    All Mountain is between these extremes, at least until someone creates an All Mountain race
    Last edited by ccm; 07-26-2006 at 03:50 PM.

  51. #51
    Prairie Dogger
    Reputation: santa cruz sooner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k

    AM:
    • Hairy Legs

    • Heavy bikes

    • At least 6" ... (travel)

    • All Balls

    • 3 1/2 hours for 12 mi....who gives a sh1t

    • Riding so they can drink more beer w/o gaining weight

    • Thinks about things like that chick that just rode by

    • Drinks beer in the parking lot

    ALL MOUNTAIN BIOTCH!! This is the best list ever!
    O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A, Our chant rolls on and on...

  52. #52
    Paste eater
    Reputation: Jwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,604
    Hey, sign me up...
    •I certainly don't want to shave my legs

    • My bike is what it is... fun

    •5inches is perfect 4 me

    •better than being a Pu$$y right?

    • When I get there I get there -- MTB'ing is suppose to be fun right?

    •MMMMMmmm... Chicks...

    •Never been one to turn a beer down, can't see why a parking lot would be an exception.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by ccm
    All Mountain is between these extremes, at least until someone creates an All Mountain race
    well, there is the superD

    http://www.pinkbike.com/news/Whistle...perD-2006.html

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13
    What would you call someone who races XC then rides back up the hill to ride the downhill course after the race? I can only think of All Mountain Racer. That should be the new All Mountainish name for what ends up just being another way to ride a bike down, or up, a hill.

  55. #55
    another bozo on the bus
    Reputation: washedup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,243
    Quote Originally Posted by mud'n'sweat
    I can answer this thread in two pictures

    AM Rider=

    XC Rider=
    he looks xc than AM to me. hardtail, clipless, bar ends and the outfit is a dead give away.

  56. #56
    Who are the brain police?
    Reputation: Locoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,106
    I'd call that person a XAMC. Cross-All-Mountain-Country.
    The Who - Glittering Girl
    Ween - The Grobe
    Yellowman - Strong Me Strong
    all your base are belong to us

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Quote Originally Posted by insanebert
    What would you call someone who races XC then rides back up the hill to ride the downhill course after the race? I can only think of All Mountain Racer. That should be the new All Mountainish name for what ends up just being another way to ride a bike down, or up, a hill.
    On the same bike he did the XC race? Wearing the same clothes and helmet?

    I'd call him a mad fool ! ! !
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  58. #58
    ccm
    ccm is online now
    West Coast Racing
    Reputation: ccm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by insanebert
    What would you call someone who races XC then rides back up the hill to ride the downhill course after the race? I can only think of All Mountain Racer. That should be the new All Mountainish name for what ends up just being another way to ride a bike down, or up, a hill.
    that used to be called just "mountain biking" and you would have to do trials and slalom on the same bike too

  59. #59
    Don't be a sheep
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,383
    Quote Originally Posted by chruby99
    Look at the guy riding the 1986 Cunningham in this thread. He smoked most of the competition on the DH riding on an old school fully rigid HT
    Keysville Pics
    What competition? The vintage guys didn't ride the full course that the true DH'ers rode. He beat other vintage riders, thats' all.
    "Do not touch the trim"

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivet
    What competition? The vintage guys didn't ride the full course that the true DH'ers rode. He beat other vintage riders, thats' all.
    Yeah, I thought that was amusing too.

    There are 2 types of old fart. Those who try to freeze time, like they lived in some magical golden age, refusing to acknowledge any further development of any kind. Then there are those who progress with the times and use their experience to get the most out of any new developments on the way, looking back at the past with fond memories.

    I'm going to try to be the second type of old fart when I get older
    Remember, there is no black magic or witchcraft, it's only a machine

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: B1KER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,127
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivet
    The vintage guys didn't ride the full course that the true DH'ers rode. He beat other vintage riders, thats' all.

    That sux. It was a good story to tell people. I still believe it's not what you ride it's how you ride!
    </robert> ::: B1KER.com - Be One

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,283
    Quote Originally Posted by mud'n'sweat
    I can answer this thread in two pictures

    AM Rider=

    XC Rider=
    But the bottom guy has some potential...... He has hairy legs

  63. #63
    Motion activated
    Reputation: Steve71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,236
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_g33k
    I still believe it's not what you ride it's how you ride!
    To a large extent I think that what you ride (bike) doesn’t determine what you ride (trails)

    But more often than not, what you ride (bike) determines how you can ride. At least that is the case around here in CO.

    BTW everyone please stop posting that image. It's just plain gross
    Happiness is a warm 2 stroke.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13
    Mad Fool I am then. But then again I am racing with a 30 pound Hardtail and baggy shorts but I do switch shoes after the race, I am not crazy enough to ride downhill with clipless, yet.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    168
    "I'd call that person a XAMC. Cross-All-Mountain-Country."

    Greaaat new term!
    Thats whats it all about...
    Nice when you say it out laud as well: This trail really "examce" ya!
    Rip the bring!

  66. #66
    Mmmm...Pivo!
    Reputation: Breznak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    102

    What's in a Definition?

    Well, I got onto this forum late and notice that everyone has a different idea--according to one guy, I would be an AM rider, and according to another, I am an XC rider. According to myself, I am simply a mountain biker who is not a racer.

    Some days I head out and say "I want to cover this route today in as little time as possible, and I will kill myself to do so." Quintessential XC. Other days, I head out thinking "I could care less how fast I average, speed on downhills is essential, and I want the ride as technical as I can possibly make it." Quintessential AM.

    So what am I really?
    1. XC racing (5x times round a 3,5 mile track) = boring for me. Not XC, but this does not make me an AM guy.
    2. However, I do ride what are known as XC marathons. I am no star, but they are fun--long climb followed by long descent. Lather, rinse, repeat ad nauseum. Some are really technical too and this is much more AM than XC.
    3. Prefer Lycra shorts. They are not comfortable, and the first thing I want to do when finishing a ride is take them off, but it beat the hell out of riding with baggies and your guys flopping around everywhere. That really hurts. Leaning XC on this one.
    4. I like climbing more than downhills. Somehow, I really enjoy the pain of long climbs, and I love the feeling of "how the hell did I manage to ride up that?" For me that is the accomplishment--anyone can use gravity to go downhill. Leaning hard XC on that one, but....
    5. What I like more than anything is terrain that is technical. Don't care if it is a climb, a descent, or flat--rocks, roots, mud, holes, washouts, etc. is what really, truly interests me. This pushes me AM.
    6. Bike: Stumpy FSR 100. Definitely XC, but with changes that pull it back AM--Talas fork up front and heavier-duty wheels and hubs to help it take the beating. Overall, I love the the Enduro, the Trance, the Nomad, etc, but these bikes are just too much of a burden on the climbs, and no matter which way you slice it, if you are an AM guy, you gotta go up hill too!
    7. I drink beer in the parking lot. I drink beer during the rides. AM all the way.
    8. Preference: I ride lots of XC style stuff simply to get myself in shape so I can hold out for 40-70 miles on the harder-core, lower-average, more technical Enduro / Epic rides that I like most of all. So the XC in me is there to allow me to be better all-mountain. I would say that this leans me AM.

    But really, who cares how you classify yourself or how others classify you. Do what you like best, ride what you can the best you can, and most importantly, have fun! XC or AM, we are all mountain bikers!!!!

  67. #67
    Natural body armor
    Reputation: Zen_Turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    Thanks Breznak,
    you saved me the time to write this down, as I was going to write exactly the same stuff.

    I don't understand this need to fit exactly in one category. It seems like everyone is giving a different definition of what XC or AM is so that they can fit exactly in one of those categories.

    I like mountain biking, not just XC-AM-DH-FR, but all of it.
    And if you are so lucky to have the money to spend in more than one bike, you can be XC or FR or AM depending on the mood of the day.

    I started from road biking and then looked into XC to improve my handling skills. I found it fun and got sucked into it (and started racing too). But then I wanted to improve on technical sections and downhills, so I started looking into AM and, hey, that's fun.... and so on.

    Let's stop trying and defining these thinks, where does it start?, where does it end?. These styles clearly overlap, but they are all mountain biking, which is what we all seem to enjoy .
    The purpose of the classifications to me is to be able to post questions in the right forum.
    Yes, there is the marketing thing, and creating a new AM definition definitely helps manufacturer to position their products. So what? It'll be easier to pick a product when I'm looking for something specific for my riding style.
    Peace

    Quote Originally Posted by Breznak
    Well, I got onto this forum late and notice that everyone has a different idea--according to one guy, I would be an AM rider, and according to another, I am an XC rider. According to myself, I am simply a mountain biker who is not a racer.

    Some days I head out and say "I want to cover this route today in as little time as possible, and I will kill myself to do so." Quintessential XC. Other days, I head out thinking "I could care less how fast I average, speed on downhills is essential, and I want the ride as technical as I can possibly make it." Quintessential AM.

    So what am I really?
    1. XC racing (5x times round a 3,5 mile track) = boring for me. Not XC, but this does not make me an AM guy.
    2. However, I do ride what are known as XC marathons. I am no star, but they are fun--long climb followed by long descent. Lather, rinse, repeat ad nauseum. Some are really technical too and this is much more AM than XC.
    3. Prefer Lycra shorts. They are not comfortable, and the first thing I want to do when finishing a ride is take them off, but it beat the hell out of riding with baggies and your guys flopping around everywhere. That really hurts. Leaning XC on this one.
    4. I like climbing more than downhills. Somehow, I really enjoy the pain of long climbs, and I love the feeling of "how the hell did I manage to ride up that?" For me that is the accomplishment--anyone can use gravity to go downhill. Leaning hard XC on that one, but....
    5. What I like more than anything is terrain that is technical. Don't care if it is a climb, a descent, or flat--rocks, roots, mud, holes, washouts, etc. is what really, truly interests me. This pushes me AM.
    6. Bike: Stumpy FSR 100. Definitely XC, but with changes that pull it back AM--Talas fork up front and heavier-duty wheels and hubs to help it take the beating. Overall, I love the the Enduro, the Trance, the Nomad, etc, but these bikes are just too much of a burden on the climbs, and no matter which way you slice it, if you are an AM guy, you gotta go up hill too!
    7. I drink beer in the parking lot. I drink beer during the rides. AM all the way.
    8. Preference: I ride lots of XC style stuff simply to get myself in shape so I can hold out for 40-70 miles on the harder-core, lower-average, more technical Enduro / Epic rides that I like most of all. So the XC in me is there to allow me to be better all-mountain. I would say that this leans me AM.

    But really, who cares how you classify yourself or how others classify you. Do what you like best, ride what you can the best you can, and most importantly, have fun! XC or AM, we are all mountain bikers!!!!
    "There is no A-line"
    Savvy Bike

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •