Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 205
  1. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    918
    Agreed. The fun and play factor is higher on 26". I liken it to seeking out a manual transmission when buying a car vs. an automatic. I don't need the trail leveled for me.

  2. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by jazzanova View Post
    I don't want to start a heated discussion. Just out of curiosity trying to find out what you guys think.
    I own a FS 29er, FS 26er converted to a 650b and have been following the fast 650b development for last 2 years.
    The current trend in the industry makes me believe the 26er bikes are becoming less popular. Just look at some manufacturers, Intense and enve both said the 26er is dead. So many small and mid-sized producers replacing them with 650b and 29". Forks, wheels, tires, almost everything new is aimed at 650b.
    It's only question of time when one of the 3 big bike companies will jump on the wagon.
    The speed with which the trend is running is astonishing.
    It took The 29" revolution to fully kick in 3x longer, at least.
    So what do you think?
    Where will we be in 2 years and do you think you will like the future?
    It seems that all serious XC racers are on 29ers, they just roll better than 26ers, so that segment is getting sown up. If the enduro racers start winning on 27.5ers then that will spell the end of the 26er segment. Perhaps the only viable future for 26ers is the downhill bike.

    26er will be around for a long time yet though but mostly in beginner packages only. Maybe a few niche manufacturers still waving the flag.

    Rocky Mtn and Scott have fully embraced the 27.5 market.

  3. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jason_recliner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Note to self: sell my near new Merida One-Twenty before it becomes worthless.

  4. #54
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    Maybe the recent fatbike craze will spark an interest in bigger tire diameters.

    I am starting to think that instead of 650b, I would rather ride some 2.7" tires on 26" wheels, if they can be made lighweight enough, say under 900g with decent knobs. And 30mm or so inner width rim. Think of around 15psi, tubeless with a bit of sealant.

    So we can buy 650b frames and forks and fit them with baloon tires.

    There always be something new, but it is still a bike. My current 26" stable rides great and I am not getting rid of them.

  5. #55
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    Quote Originally Posted by stepitup_onenotch View Post
    It seems that all serious XC racers are on 29ers
    World champion is on 650b. But I, for one, truly, deeply do not care what pro's run. I ain't frigging racing the clock every time out.

    No racers ride fatbikes, but they are fun and getting popular. It is not about racing.

  6. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    9
    I personally love the 26 inch bikes but im looking forward to getting a 29er

  7. #57
    ~ B A D A S S ~
    Reputation: car bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    3,058
    soon it will all be 36ers, fat 36ers and the new rivaling standards 39 and 37,5/6500b
    Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbicycles View Post
    Specialized sucks ass.

  8. #58
    Stand back
    Reputation: dbabuser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,143
    Quote Originally Posted by stepitup_onenotch View Post
    It seems that all serious XC racers are on 29ers, they just roll better than 26ers, so that segment is getting sown up. If the enduro racers start winning on 27.5ers then that will spell the end of the 26er segment. Perhaps the only viable future for 26ers is the downhill bike.

    26er will be around for a long time yet though but mostly in beginner packages only. Maybe a few niche manufacturers still waving the flag.

    Rocky Mtn and Scott have fully embraced the 27.5 market.
    I don't see any market for a 27.5 or 29" dirt jumper.
    Golden Bike Park

    Golden Connector Trails need your support!

  9. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HillClimber823's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    71

    Is 26er a dying breed?

    Yup, 26 is what I roll and won't change. Just another fad like MC Hammer pants or Kris's Kross with wearing their pants backwards.

  10. #60
    Helmetless Crasher
    Reputation: Stumpjumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,071
    For XC racing, I'd say the 26 is on its way out.

    Being fazed out of other disciplines of MTB? Very doubtful.
    '95 M2 StumpJumper FS
    '11 Cannondale RZ 120-two

  11. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    491
    I love 26ers and 29ers equally. I wish there was something between these sizes. I bet it would be the best of both worlds!

    Buster Bluth. Yiddish for "seeker of toilets"

  12. #62
    How much further ???
    Reputation: Douger-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,369
    You know I was out riding the other day and I started thinking. "Man I am the pefect specimen of a mountain biker. Perfect in everyway physically and mentally. There is no longer room for improvement. I am a perfect 200lbs weekend warrior with a little beer gut and the only way I can improve is to start changing the sizes of components on my bike. I would like the following.

    - A 17.5 mm TA for the front because 20m is too beefy and way too heavy and the 15mm flexes way too much.
    - A 173.25 mm crank arm. Im my experience this is the perfect blend of rotational performance and rock clearance.
    - A 13.476 mm TA for the rear with a 147.5 spacing because I need that little extra stiffness to make me climb better.
    - A 31.1625 mm diameter seatpost because the 31.6 is just too heavy and slows me down.
    - A 2" top and 1.75" bottom reverse tapered headtube/steerer because the current 1.5" tapered systems are hard to turn and the 2" upper diameter adds the perfect amount of torsional stiffness without compromising rotaional friction.

    That is all for now.
    “Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did." Mark Twain

  13. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,233
    Quote Originally Posted by Douger-1 View Post
    You know I was out riding the other day and I started thinking. "Man I am the pefect specimen of a mountain biker. Perfect in everyway physically and mentally. There is no longer room for improvement. I am a perfect 200lbs weekend warrior with a little beer gut and the only way I can improve is to start changing the sizes of components on my bike. I would like the following.

    - A 17.5 mm TA for the front because 20m is too beefy and way too heavy and the 15mm flexes way too much.
    - A 173.25 mm crank arm. Im my experience this is the perfect blend of rotational performance and rock clearance.
    - A 13.476 mm TA for the rear with a 147.5 spacing because I need that little extra stiffness to make me climb better.
    - A 31.1625 mm diameter seatpost because the 31.6 is just too heavy and slows me down.
    - A 2" top and 1.75" bottom reverse tapered headtube/steerer because the current 1.5" tapered systems are hard to turn and the 2" upper diameter adds the perfect amount of torsional stiffness without compromising rotaional friction.

    That is all for now.
    I love you...

  14. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rustybkr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    382

    Re: Is 26er a dying breed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Douger-1 View Post
    You know I was out riding the other day and I started thinking. "Man I am the pefect specimen of a mountain biker. Perfect in everyway physically and mentally. There is no longer room for improvement. I am a perfect 200lbs weekend warrior with a little beer gut and the only way I can improve is to start changing the sizes of components on my bike. I would like the following.

    - A 17.5 mm TA for the front because 20m is too beefy and way too heavy and the 15mm flexes way too much.
    - A 173.25 mm crank arm. Im my experience this is the perfect blend of rotational performance and rock clearance.
    - A 13.476 mm TA for the rear with a 147.5 spacing because I need that little extra stiffness to make me climb better.
    - A 31.1625 mm diameter seatpost because the 31.6 is just too heavy and slows me down.
    - A 2" top and 1.75" bottom reverse tapered headtube/steerer because the current 1.5" tapered systems are hard to turn and the 2" upper diameter adds the perfect amount of torsional stiffness without compromising rotaional friction.

    That is all for now.
    Great post, I agree completely.

  15. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    396
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray Raton View Post
    You think 200 pages would be enough? For those of us who have been trail riding forever, like me (well over 20+years), seeing the same questions, over and over, and over....etc. can be trying. Sometimes humor is a good outlet to that experience, but I gotta remind myself that a good percentage of the askers who come to this site, with those questions, are beginners, and they ARE seriously asking them.

    That said, I don't feel too bad about having just a tiny bit of fun at their expense, from time to time.

    I mean, ultimately, riding a bike had better be, at least in part ( a LARGE part, IMO ), about having fun, no?
    Lol.
    what bike should I buy? my budget is $2000
    thanks.

  16. #66
    beater
    Reputation: evasive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by dbabuser View Post
    I don't see any market for a 27.5 or 29" dirt jumper.
    Or slopestyle. And 26" is already considered a bit of a handful with trials. Those disciplines are never going to even experiment with larger wheels; there's no point.
    "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." - Dr. Peter Venkman

    Riding in Helena? Everything you need to know, right here.

  17. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    428

    RE: Is 26er a dying breed?

    I xc race a 26er and don't plan on changing any time soon.

    Sent from my HTC6990LVW using Board Express

  18. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bigfruits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    861
    who cares about the marketing BS? im thrilled there are so many options. im sure when i bust my 26" rim in a 4 years ill be able to pick up a nice replacement. maybe really cheap.

    i already know that 29ers are not for me. i can perfectly see how they would be great for certain types of trails. who cares what works best for others?

    27.5" AM FS bike? mmmmmmmm

  19. #69
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,582
    29er DH tires in production, look out! Intense and Trek have 29er DH protos. Wouldn't be surprised if Spec had something as well. 650b is already in the international pro DH ranks.

    Should that make 26" fans worried? No. Normal/average people cling to familiarity, and many are familiar with 26". Skilled and talented folk adapt quickly to many things and like to accept the challenge of defying what people think are the limits of something. If anything, I wanna see how 29er DH bikes do trying to clear the big DH track doubles, which were built with 26" bikes in mind. Wonder if there will be sections of bike park jump rhythm sections dedicated to beginners and big wheels, built bigger or with shorter gaps, or maybe include more sissy lines and rename them sissy/big wheeler lines. Stuff like this would only add fuel to the endless debate, as if we already didn't know what the differences between all the options were clearly enough.

    Worry is just not the right word. It's more like disappointment. When you thought $1500 was reasonable and $3000 was expensive, now $3000 is reasonable and $6000 is expensive. People are disappointed that prices are going up and people are willing to pay for "innovative" small batch stuff, when production on a large scale (think car parts) could bring prices down if we settled on a standard. Most of these innovations are just old ideas being revived and taken a few steps beyond anyways. Marketing is just hyping it all up and manufacturers are being pulled along for the ride, "to keep up". They feel if they don't have a 29er HT model, they can't compete, and their 26" HTs aren't selling, since marketing has hyped up the new wheel sizes so much. FS is a diff ball game though, with the marketing working to hype up DW Link VPP, Switch, etc. with the wheel size being secondary to the FS design.

    Many of us would just like to say, just ride, but when parts break and you search for something stronger and maybe lighter, you get disappointed that there are all these new options with incompatible standards. When one "sounds good" (F'n marketing), then you need a frame to hang all those new standard components on, then that comes with other new standards...

    MTBR has turned into mtn bike keep up with latest standard changes, rather than mtn bike review, where we say what parts break and aren't worth money, and buy that other part instead. Now the review section is dead, and people are just talking about the latest and greatest to upgrade to, if your stuff isn't working out to your satisfaction.

  20. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfruits View Post
    who cares about the marketing BS? im thrilled there are so many options.
    I'd disagree on the "so many options".

    A lot of bike companies are deciding for us. E.g. if you want an XC bike your choice is a) 29er, b) 29er or c) 29er.

  21. #71
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    Skilled and talented folk adapt quickly to many things and like to accept the challenge of defying what people think are the limits of something. If anything, I wanna see how 29er DH bikes do trying to clear the big DH track doubles, which were built with 26" bikes in mind.
    If you are implying that skill and talent implies preference for larger wheels, I would say that's bollocks.

    No amount of skill and talent will add several inches to my 174cm height. Long travel 29r just do not fit me, period. Nor do I care to go through silly contortions to try to make'em fit.

  22. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    29er DH tires in production, look out! Intense and Trek have 29er DH protos. Wouldn't be surprised if Spec had something as well. 650b is already in the international pro DH ranks.

    Should that make 26" fans worried? No. Normal/average people cling to familiarity, and many are familiar with 26". Skilled and talented folk adapt quickly to many things and like to accept the challenge of defying what people think are the limits of something. If anything, I wanna see how 29er DH bikes do trying to clear the big DH track doubles, which were built with 26" bikes in mind. Wonder if there will be sections of bike park jump rhythm sections dedicated to beginners and big wheels, built bigger or with shorter gaps, or maybe include more sissy lines and rename them sissy/big wheeler lines. Stuff like this would only add fuel to the endless debate, as if we already didn't know what the differences between all the options were clearly enough.

    Worry is just not the right word. It's more like disappointment. When you thought $1500 was reasonable and $3000 was expensive, now $3000 is reasonable and $6000 is expensive. People are disappointed that prices are going up and people are willing to pay for "innovative" small batch stuff, when production on a large scale (think car parts) could bring prices down if we settled on a standard. Most of these innovations are just old ideas being revived and taken a few steps beyond anyways. Marketing is just hyping it all up and manufacturers are being pulled along for the ride, "to keep up". They feel if they don't have a 29er HT model, they can't compete, and their 26" HTs aren't selling, since marketing has hyped up the new wheel sizes so much. FS is a diff ball game though, with the marketing working to hype up DW Link VPP, Switch, etc. with the wheel size being secondary to the FS design.

    Many of us would just like to say, just ride, but when parts break and you search for something stronger and maybe lighter, you get disappointed that there are all these new options with incompatible standards. When one "sounds good" (F'n marketing), then you need a frame to hang all those new standard components on, then that comes with other new standards...

    MTBR has turned into mtn bike keep up with latest standard changes, rather than mtn bike review, where we say what parts break and aren't worth money, and buy that other part instead. Now the review section is dead, and people are just talking about the latest and greatest to upgrade to, if your stuff isn't working out to your satisfaction.
    It's funny how you can see individual biases in how people respond to this thread (I'm not picking on you, yours was just the most recent).

    People crave certainty, and people crave status. You can see it in the mountain bike crowd. Small wheel people crave certainty "I'm going to be riding it forever... screw anyone else" big wheelers crave status "no one who is anyone rides less than a 29er for xc".

    I guess this keeps life interesting.....

  23. #73
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Axe View Post
    If you are implying that skill and talent implies preference for larger wheels, I would say that's bollocks.

    No amount of skill and talent will add several inches to my 174cm height. Long travel 29r just do not fit me, period. Nor do I care to go through silly contortions to try to make'em fit.
    I was speaking of how very good riders can adapt to any bike. Tell a rider that 29ers suck at jumping--if that rider is skilled like Mike Montgomery and he sees a nice looking jump and sees that it's a possibility, although difficult, he might not just jump it, he'll backflip it. I wouldn't imply that he would prefer it. I believe most would prefer something that made them better and allowed them to approach loftier challenges with a more realistic chance of succeeding. I'm just saying, bigger wheels in the limelight will just make it clearer or more apparent the various advantages and disadvantages of bigger wheels. I can imagine Rob Warner even commentating on it, when he sees a big wheeler (650b in the case of World Cup DH), despite it being a subject people are sick of discussing.

    I'm not trying to convince people to change their beliefs. I'm just trying to look at the big picture sharing my perspective. 26" riders are voicing out for a good cause. I dislike the marketing and direction it's taking biking in general. Soon we'll have electronics and batteries on our bikes, controlling our suspension damping, shifting, adjustable geo, and seatpost. It's already been spotted and talked about, but some of us will be on it. Then $4500 will be a reasonable price with $9000 being expensive. The guys at work will still be like, you spent how much on a bike, a "pedal bike"?

  24. #74
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    I was speaking of how very good riders can adapt to any bike.
    No. For example, no matter how good my daughter could ride, she can not even fit on a 26" well. She is like 4'8". She rides a 24" wheeled full suspension.

    29r on 150+mm travel rear and 150+ front even in Medium size is already a frigging barge. It is not a matter of beliefs. It is a matter of human body dimensions. Yes, you can contortion yourself onto it, maybe. Maybe somebody will like it. But it would have nothing to do with their skills.

  25. #75
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,582
    I get your point, in terms of performance that comes with good fit, but you're being a bit closed minded now. What kind of picture goes through your mind of fitting your daughter on a 58+" (2x bigger than a 29er) two-wheeled pedal powered vehicle? Don't turn this thread into a picture gallery of clown bikes. (Click to see image to see if you were imagining anything like this... this thing redefines all-terrain, as it can travel on top of water too) The point behind the pic is to be open minded. You are focusing on a very narrow set of requirements.

    This kind of talk reminded me of this video: LINK. It seems that guy adapted to a very awkward fit. People get mad when their BBs are 13.5" or taller, or wheelbases longer than 45", on their bikes... well, no point to this other than there are people who have fun regardless.
    Last edited by Varaxis; 02-12-2013 at 05:12 PM.

  26. #76
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    I get your point, in terms of performance that comes with good fit, but you're being a bit closed minded now.
    About what? About performance benefits of a larger wheel? Bollocks. I would not buy another XC hardtail with 26" wheels, it makes sense and 29 or 650b fits me great. But you are closed minded if you do not see the other side. Physics will always be the same. Wheel stiffness decreases as cube of diameter. Weight increases linearly. And humans are of certain nature given size. And very few of them race against clock.

  27. #77
    How much further ???
    Reputation: Douger-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    I get your point, in terms of performance that comes with good fit, but you're being a bit closed minded now. What kind of picture goes through your mind of fitting your daughter on a 58+" (2x bigger than a 29er) two-wheeled pedal powered vehicle? Don't turn this thread into a picture gallery of clown bikes. (Click to see image to see if you were imagining anything like this... this thing redefines all-terrain, as it can travel on top of water too) The point behind the pic is to be open minded. You are focusing on a very narrow set of requirements.

    This kind of talk reminded me of this video: LINK. It seems that guy adapted to a very awkward fit. People get mad when their BBs are 13.5" or taller, or wheelbases longer than 45", on their bikes... well, no point to this other than there are people who have fun regardless.
    Reading this really confirms to me you totally took my post above out of context. I was mocking all the different standards the bike industry throws at us, and how when it comes down to it, it doesn't make much difference. I'm sorry you didn't see that and felt the need to neg rep me. And in turn confirms my neg repping of you as you seem to be a bit hypocritical with your "open minded comment" and then being insulted by my post.
    For the record I have a 29er HT as well as a 26er FS and enjoy the heck out of both of them. Happy trails riding whatever bike you want.
    Last edited by Douger-1; 02-12-2013 at 05:51 PM.
    “Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did." Mark Twain

  28. #78
    Axe
    Axe is offline
    Custom User Title
    Reputation: Axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,939
    What we all are forgetting here is that the most important bike characteristic is color.

    I had to discard a perfectly good Kona and order Nicolai because that was the easier way to get the right hue of blue on the frame that my daughter helped me to pick - and without any silly colorway combinations that are so popular now. Seriously, some of the graphics offered are borderline disgusting.

    Maybe I can repaint Kona too, but that is a bit of a hassle. It just did not ride well with its puke brown color.

    Wheel size is not nearly as important.

  29. #79
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,582
    My 29er HT has a terrible fit, with a front end too high (steep HA, long head tube, ext headset, big wheel), seat too low (sub 12" BB), the front wheel rubbing my toe, and really short seat tube that accepts a 27.2 post which meant ****ty (or expensive) dropper post options. I went from having fun popping off even the smallest stone sticking halfway out of the ground, bunny hopping over things, and skidding around and having fun on my 26HT, to getting NO AIR and just cruising for miles with out any style on a two niner.

    I did not like that HT much, and I should really sell it, yet I still bought a Yeti SB95, a "long travel" 29er, despite demo'ing it back to back with a ASR5c and SB66. No logic what so ever behind the decision! I blame marketing! I don't see why do people buy these things up. *sarcasm*

    Riding them is fun in their own right, even my ill-fitting 29 HT. They alter the challenge of my local trails and I ride them each differently. People can buy speed, stability, confidence, capability, and even buy a little style (zomg flickable for srs whips!). Death to having only a few options? Oh noes, my wallet can't take it. Must make noise to stop it.

  30. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Fuglio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,636
    this whole thread makes me want to buy a bighit with a 24" rear wheel.

  31. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,233

    Re: Is 26er a dying breed?

    Are 26ers a dying breed...?

    I wonder where the nearest sperm bank is...
    Maybe I could sell some plasma. I don't know I'm just broke as hell.

    Wheel size?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEf5V...e_gdata_player
    There's something about those long grueling climbs that gets my front end all stiff... And I'm not talking about lockout...

  32. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,384
    I still don't understand the debate, here. If you have a particular riding style on particular trails, then there is the perfect bike with the perfect components out there for you. If you do your research, you'll find it. If you can't, then that's why, thankfully, we have bike shops. Too many standards is only really a problem for dealers, as they have to stock the parts. They don't have it? Call another one or wait a couple of days for them to order it. It's not the end of the world. Will everybody notice the difference between a 26" and 27.5" wheel? No. Will others? Yes! True, new standards are driven by manufacturers to sell more products, but there's nothing wrong with choices. Will prices go up as companies put more $$ into research and molds for new standards? Sure. However, you can spend $700 today and get a pretty darn good bike that would beat the crap out of a $2000 bike from 10 years ago. Things are getting more expensive, but a lot of people don't need to keep up with the trends. Do you need to buy a new bike with a tapered headtube, 650b wheels, 142mm rear end, 15mm axle fork, and tubeless compatible tires to enjoy the trails? Absolutely not. When the time does come for a new bike, however, isn't it nice to know that your new bike will be maximized for your particular needs? Stay informed and do your research, and use the options to your advantage. You don't want 29" wheels? Great, you have other options. Don't buy them and be happy. Dumbing down technology for the few people that don't understand it is stupid. Kind of like dumbing down trails for the few people that can't ride a more advanced trail, isn't it? Options are good, whether you need them or not.

  33. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    76
    I just went two months of hell trying to decide which wheel size I wanted. I started out wanting HT 29er, then FS 29er, then HT or FS 650b and finally just settled on SC Heckler solely because with that frame you can have both 26er and 650b. I think that is something everyone is forgetting is that a lot of these 26er frames can accept 650b wheels without issues. I went with the Heckler also because I am a big guy (6'3 270lbs) and a 29er wheel just seems like it will be easy to taco for AM riding. What really sold me to stay with the 26er is that most of the frames built around 26er wheels can be converted, and as more and more becomes available for the 650b prices will come down and I will buy a 650b wheel set.

  34. #84
    dwt
    dwt is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dwt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,168

    Is 26er a dying breed?

    Quote Originally Posted by dbabuser View Post
    I don't see any market for a 27.5 or 29" dirt jumper.
    Is 26er a dying breed?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1360767044.202360.jpg


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Old enough to know better. And old enough not to care. Best age to be.

  35. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,478
    If 29'ers are Gay, are 27.5'ers Bi-curious?

  36. #86
    troll
    Reputation: brokebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    120
    Over the course of the past two years, I've gotten rid of all my 700 bikes except for one silly Italian track bike that is just too pretty to let go at this point. Now, my 5 main bikes are all 26". The cool thing is, they're all Surlys, and all but one of them, my LHT, will accept wheels larger than 26" if for some reason it ever becomes hard to get 26" wheels... but I see "swing bikes" coming back into fashion before I see that ever happening, so I'm not sweating it.

  37. #87
    How much further ???
    Reputation: Douger-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by mountainbiker24 View Post
    I still don't understand the debate, here. If you have a particular riding style on particular trails, then there is the perfect bike with the perfect components out there for you. If you do your research, you'll find it. If you can't, then that's why, thankfully, we have bike shops. Too many standards is only really a problem for dealers, as they have to stock the parts. They don't have it? Call another one or wait a couple of days for them to order it. It's not the end of the world. Will everybody notice the difference between a 26" and 27.5" wheel? No. Will others? Yes! True, new standards are driven by manufacturers to sell more products, but there's nothing wrong with choices. Will prices go up as companies put more $$ into research and molds for new standards? Sure. However, you can spend $700 today and get a pretty darn good bike that would beat the crap out of a $2000 bike from 10 years ago. Things are getting more expensive, but a lot of people don't need to keep up with the trends. Do you need to buy a new bike with a tapered headtube, 650b wheels, 142mm rear end, 15mm axle fork, and tubeless compatible tires to enjoy the trails? Absolutely not. When the time does come for a new bike, however, isn't it nice to know that your new bike will be maximized for your particular needs? Stay informed and do your research, and use the options to your advantage. You don't want 29" wheels? Great, you have other options. Don't buy them and be happy. Dumbing down technology for the few people that don't understand it is stupid. Kind of like dumbing down trails for the few people that can't ride a more advanced trail, isn't it? Options are good, whether you need them or not.
    Im not sure if this was directed at me in part but I'll take a stab at it.

    First no one is saying to dumb down technology. My point is there is a difference between theoretical data, emperical data, and user experience. I wont go into detail but that is all I was trying to say. You can add 2mm to my stanchon tube diameter and add 3/4 of an inch to the radius of my wheel and sell me on how theoretically it makes everything better. But when it comes down to it, for the average person on the trail, I really doubt you can quantify those very small changes into any real tangible performance gain. If your user experience is better because you think you can notice a 2mm increase in stanchon tube diameter even though emperical data shows no performance increase than great !!! But lets call it what it is.

    In addition as someone who works on their bikes and keeps them a very long time I find the number of standards frustrating. My Slayer has a 20mm TA but when looking for my 29er HT good luck finding a 29er fork with 20mm TA. Yes the Revelation used to come in 20mm but has recently gone to 15mm. What does this mean? Now I have to buy 15mm TA adaptors for my trueing stand. Now I have to buy a 15mm TA adaptor for my roof rack. Now if I want to move the hub from my 29er to my Slayer I have to spend more $$$ to buy a new axle conversion kit. And what are we as consumers getting for all of this other than a lighter wallet?

    Thats fine if you disagree with me. I am all for riding what you want. Its your money. Im just raising another view point. I apologize if people like Varaxis are insulted by my posts.
    “Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did." Mark Twain

  38. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Douger-1 View Post
    Im not sure if this was directed at me in part but I'll take a stab at it.

    First no one is saying to dumb down technology. My point is there is a difference between theoretical data, emperical data, and user experience. I wont go into detail but that is all I was trying to say. You can add 2mm to my stanchon tube diameter and add 3/4 of an inch to the radius of my wheel and sell me on how theoretically it makes everything better. But when it comes down to it, for the average person on the trail, I really doubt you can quantify those very small changes into any real tangible performance gain. If your user experience is better because you think you can notice a 2mm increase in stanchon tube diameter even though emperical data shows no performance increase than great !!! But lets call it what it is.

    In addition as someone who works on their bikes and keeps them a very long time I find the number of standards frustrating. My Slayer has a 20mm TA but when looking for my 29er HT good luck finding a 29er fork with 20mm TA. Yes the Revelation used to come in 20mm but has recently gone to 15mm. What does this mean? Now I have to buy 15mm TA adaptors for my trueing stand. Now I have to buy a 15mm TA adaptor for my roof rack. Now if I want to move the hub from my 29er to my Slayer I have to spend more $$$ to buy a new axle conversion kit. And what are we as consumers getting for all of this other than a lighter wallet?

    Thats fine if you disagree with me. I am all for riding what you want. Its your money. Im just raising another view point. I apologize if people like Varaxis are insulted by my posts.
    My post wasn't directed at anybody in particular. I just get a kick out of it when people say things are getting too expensive or there are too many choices! Everybody's got an opinion, which is why there are so many options in the first place. I 100% agree that most people won't notice the difference between a 15 and 20mm front axle or tubed and tubeless wheels. However, some people do, and they might get more enjoyment if their front wheel tracks a little straighter in the rocks. My point in general is to buy what you need or what you want. Don't buy it because somebody tells you you need it. Be an informed buyer, and enjoy the technology we have!

  39. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 5power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    416
    I drank the 29er cool-aid and now back on a 26. Last I look a year ago I think 26 inch was still winning on the xc worldcup level. Retro is cool.

  40. #90
    dwt
    dwt is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dwt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,168

    Is 26er a dying breed?

    Quote Originally Posted by mountainbiker24 View Post

    My point in general is to buy what you need or what you want. Don't buy it because somebody tells you you need it. Be an informed buyer, and enjoy the technology we have!
    Is 26er a dying breed?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1360798550.309865.jpg

    I would only add: If you can tell the difference between different components ( whatever they are) buy the one you like best and keep smiling. If you cannot tell the difference, do not waste money on a hyped component. If you are a casual rider, buy the cheapest bike available (from a reputable shop, NOT Walmart, Costco,Target, or Dix) that you can ride comfortably, so long as the shop warrants it won't fall apart and will replace parts that break.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Old enough to know better. And old enough not to care. Best age to be.

  41. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jason_recliner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Why is wheel diameter such an emotional and sensitive issue? Are bike owners worried that if the other size becomes the standard, then their bikes will be worthless? There are so many options out there for everything (forks, frames, seats, pedals, etc, etc) but nothing seems to generate arguments like 26 vs 29.

    What's the story here?

  42. #92
    troll
    Reputation: brokebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by jason_recliner View Post
    nothing seems to generate arguments like 26 vs 29.

    What's the story here?
    "Emotional and sensitive" could give a clue here... could it simply be the same old story that always comes up when comparing things... everyone wants a bigger _______, or they want to say they have a big __________.

    Insert whatever noun works for you.

  43. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jason_recliner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by brokebike View Post
    "Emotional and sensitive" could give a clue here... could it simply be the same old story that always comes up when comparing things... everyone wants a bigger _______, or they want to say they have a big __________.

    Insert whatever noun works for you.
    Rim?


  44. #94
    Registered text offender
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,137
    I find it difficult to take any opinion seriously that would imply one wheel size is superior to all others universally.

    Everything is a compromise. Be it wheel size, frame material, suspension design, nothing is best at everything having attributes which may be well suited for some applications but poorly suited for others.

    But hey, it's only facts and physics

  45. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,233

    Re: Is 26er a dying breed?

    I bet if you go back to the very first mtbr 26v29 debate, I bet its really just manufacturers and lbs' in disguise to get their product to sell. I'm going to do 5xc races this year on a 28lb 5" 26er and i don't give a fuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhq! :beer:
    Last edited by kikoraa; 02-14-2013 at 05:12 AM.
    There's something about those long grueling climbs that gets my front end all stiff... And I'm not talking about lockout...

  46. #96
    Stand back
    Reputation: dbabuser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,143
    I think the only thing to get really concerned about is that manufacturers will abandon the lesser selling wheel size (or whatever standard). It's already happened with tires, to some degree. WTB dropped their wider 26" offerings, as there is more money to be made in 27.5 and 29 right now. RIP, 2.5 Weirwolf, 2.55 Weirwolf LT, 2.5 Moto Raptor...
    Golden Bike Park

    Golden Connector Trails need your support!

  47. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TwoHeadsBrewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,867
    Quote Originally Posted by dbabuser View Post
    I think the only thing to get really concerned about is that manufacturers will abandon the lesser selling wheel size (or whatever standard). It's already happened with tires, to some degree. WTB dropped their wider 26" offerings, as there is more money to be made in 27.5 and 29 right now. RIP, 2.5 Weirwolf, 2.55 Weirwolf LT, 2.5 Moto Raptor...
    IDK if 27.5 wheels are the reason for that, it looks like they don't have ANY DH/FR tires on their website anymore:
    WTB » Products – Tires

    But they do have lots of AM and XC tires in 26" flavor! As for there being "more money" in other tire sizes...how do you figure? The majority of the market is still in 26" wheels, even though the other sizes are gaining in popularity.
    "Got everything you need?"

  48. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: brunomu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    499
    i have 2 all mountain full suspension bikes 26 inch, and a 29er hardtail,i love my full suspension bikes for downhill suff and jumping even technical climbing i like,but i have to admit that something good is in that 29er hardtail and i enjoy so much riding that bike, in the downhills i can`t go as fast and can`t jump as good as my all mountain, but this is a hardtail bike and is very good to be a simple hardtail i even feel that is better in the downhills that any cross country full supension 26ers, and don`t even talk about the climbing, is so fast but you need sometimes to put more power to the pedals thats it, im really want to try all mountain 29er full suspension maybe kona satori or stumpjumper fsr evo 29er, for shure my next bike is gona be 29er all mountain, as for 27.5 i think that is so close to 26er that are little difference, what im shure is dead is the old 26 hardtail.

  49. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8
    nah

  50. #100
    Registered text offender
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,137
    Quote Originally Posted by brunomu View Post
    what im shure is dead is the old 26 hardtail.
    I just put together my newest bike-a 26" hardtail.

    15.5" chain stays are not happening with a 29" wheel.

    I like 29ers, I rented a Tallboy and thought it was great but again, one wheel size will never be best for all situations across the board.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •