Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 79
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774

    Caution;  Merge;  Workers Ahead! Upside-down riserhandlebars=Dropperbars. Short persons on 36ers, 29ers and 32ers

    Let's put an end to the high cockpit issue.








    I don't give a rat's ass what it looks like. The goal is to place a handlebar as low as one wishes- what's wrong with that? All those whiners go to the woman fashion forum if you do not like this idea.

    Update:
    Pro Bike: Emily Batty's Trek Superfly Elite - BikeRadar
    [...]Even so, Batty's position requires a few tweaks: the seatpost is flipped around to provide less setback and there's a -25 Bontrager Race Lite (instead of the usual RXL or RXXXL model) stem up front, sitting right atop the headset compression ring, with the upper cover removed to cut out a few millimeters of stack height.[...]




    Solution to too much inverted stems and lack of upper cap. Stem -17 for a 29er and +6 for a 26er. Both have 100 forks. Dropper bar for the 29er. Is Trek stupid? It would offer a much better fit.
    Last edited by Davidcopperfield; 10-19-2011 at 01:19 PM.

  2. #2
    Professional Crastinator
    Reputation: Fleas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,128
    Whatever works, but unnecessary for my rig. However, psychologically, I would want some kind of pad on the stem. Somehow it just looks more dangerous with an inverted riser bar. Like "Here - I've prepared a nice spot for you on which to smash your face".

    -F

  3. #3
    Bike Snob
    Reputation: can't get right's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,256
    It's a good thing you don't care what it looks like because it looks like dung.

    P.S.I could not find the women's fashion forum. Please add link.

  4. #4
    meow meow
    Reputation: b-kul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    10,622
    are you trying to pass this off as a new innovation?

  5. #5
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,615
    they look like they're sad....
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  6. #6
    anyone else smell that?
    Reputation: jgsatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,314
    my back hurts just looking at that.

    also, might want to get a front fender.
    1. Your signature can not be longer than 125 characters.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,019
    {QUOTE} I don't give a rat's ass what it looks like. The goal is to place a handlebar as low as one wishes- what's wrong with that? All those whiners go to the woman fashion forum if you do not like this idea


    29er zealot, now x-post this in the 650b forum.

  8. #8
    Administrator Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,999
    You know what? If you are short enough to have difficulties fitting a 29er it is OK to ride a 26er or a 650ber. 26er have been around for a long time and are really well sorted out. They ride really nicely and there is a huge selection of lightweight wheels and tires available, plus you can use flat bars and a standard rise stem. 650b-ers give you a slightly larger wheel so you get some of the roll over benefits but without the extra standover and high front end of the 29er. They fit some standard 26er forks so your headtube stem interface shouldn't be wonky like these.

    Seriously 29ers are not the solution for everyone, and even though they are in vogue now doesn't mean they are neither revolutionary nor evolutionary, especially for shorter riders. Buy something that works for you not something that works against you.
    Try this: HTFU

  9. #9
    loud hubs save lives
    Reputation: sennaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    500
    does this set-up require extra dental insurance?

  10. #10
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,810
    Quote Originally Posted by rockcrusher View Post
    You know what? If you are short enough to have difficulties fitting a 29er it is OK to ride a 26er or a 650ber.
    Its not just a short thing. I've seen a few average height and tall people doing this because they're obsessed with the idea of having their bars the same height as their 26". Guess its fear that they can't deal with a slightly higher center of gravity. Which, if thats the case, would be an even better reason to go back to 26"

  11. #11
    meow meow
    Reputation: b-kul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    10,622
    Quote Originally Posted by 92gli View Post
    Its not just a short thing. I've seen a few average height and tall people doing this because they're obsessed with the idea of having their bars the same height as their 26". Guess its fear that they can't deal with a slightly higher center of gravity. Which, if thats the case, would be an even better reason to go back to 26"
    i would think your cog would have more to do with bb height vs bar height.

  12. #12
    West Chester, PA
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,810
    Quote Originally Posted by b-kul View Post
    i would think your cog would have more to do with bb height vs bar height.
    In reality yes, but I was thinking more of the riders perception. Should have stated that better.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    343

    They really do look sad...

    Might not be the best choice for the chronically depressed among us. Glad to know I wasn't the only one who thought that when first seen.

  14. #14
    meow meow
    Reputation: b-kul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    10,622
    Quote Originally Posted by 92gli View Post
    In reality yes, but I was thinking more of the riders perception. Should have stated that better.
    thats what i was thinking, just a little confused.

  15. #15
    burnedthetoast
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    223
    In the first photo the seat appears to be about 6 inches higher than the bars. Is this so you always feel like you're going downhill??
    Ride to Work, Work to Live, Live to Ride

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    56
    I would be concerned about the ergonomics of the upsidedown riser bars . Thats gotta wreak havoc on your wrists.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: boomn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,647
    Quote Originally Posted by nolamonster View Post
    I would be concerned about the ergonomics of the upsidedown riser bars . Thats gotta wreak havoc on your wrists.
    Depends on the back sweep, the angle of the bar, relative saddle height, etc but a bit of down sweep like that can feel very comfy

  18. #18
    Nouveau Retrogrouch SuperModerator
    Reputation: shiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    48,307
    Quote Originally Posted by nolamonster View Post
    I would be concerned about the ergonomics of the upsidedown riser bars . Thats gotta wreak havoc on your wrists.
    You just rotate the bar until it feels right. Does not matter whether it has rise, drop or is flat.
    mtbtires.com
    The trouble with common sense is it is no longer common

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    When we gaze at road handle bars it is ok and not sad or something on monstercross but when we see a mtb riser handlebar with flipped stem it is definitely not ok? I guess we all need to get used to it the way we did to 29ers overall. In extremities like a 5'2" dudette wanting a Lunchbox or Lenz PBJ we would need some king of cusion shield on the headset stack, however when the rider likes the 29er wheels and prefers them over 26ers then I see nothing against customizing the position. Why 29ers have to take after 26ers? They are different bikes apart from CS, wheel base etc. If it works on road bikes then why not on 29ers?

    I agree that handlebar designed to be used up may not always be exellent however if inverted risers were designed then it would be comfortable for the wrists. I guess Ninerbikes should include such handlears for extra small riders under 160cm as a sidenote not the one below. It is just an axample monstercross bars when headset is higher than grips.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  20. #20
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    Three red chicklets, and some people complain that the rep system does not work.

  21. #21
    Administrator Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    When we gaze at road handle bars it is ok and not sad or something on monstercross but when we see a mtb riser handlebar with flipped stem it is definitely not ok? I guess we all need to get used to it the way we did to 29ers overall. In extremities like a 5'2" dudette wanting a Lunchbox or Lenz PBJ we would need some king of cusion shield on the headset stack, however when the rider likes the 29er wheels and prefers them over 26ers then I see nothing against customizing the position. Why 29ers have to take after 26ers? They are different bikes apart from CS, wheel base etc. If it works on road bikes then why not on 29ers?

    I agree that handlebar designed to be used up may not always be exellent however if inverted risers were designed then it would be comfortable for the wrists. I guess Ninerbikes should include such handlears for extra small riders under 160cm as a sidenote not the one below. It is just an axample monstercross bars when headset is higher than grips.
    As you have shown in your pictures there is no need to design inverted risers bars because you just take a standard riser, mount it upside down, and use it is such. The only reason to design an upside down riser would be so that the brand sticker/model name was facing up instead of inverted which would be madness for any manufacturer to pursue strictly for the purpose of an upside down handlebar. Perhaps in the future if you nag some manufacturers enough they might put on double stickers like they have on stems so you can chose the mounting orientation that best suits your use.

    However I would think that a custom stem with substantial drop would be the best solution as you could then use a standard flat bar and reap the benefits of their weight savings.
    Try this: HTFU

  22. #22
    I live to bike
    Reputation: Jwiffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,232
    My question is why do some of the bikes have spacers under the stem, only to flip the stem and/or bar? Like the first pic - take out the spacers and you could run a normal stem, maybe in the down position, and it wouldn't look so odd.
    Stop in at Element Sports. www.elementsport.com
    Get Out! Have Fun!

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    The bikes present some "new" or innovative solution, though they are larges. This solution must be applied to S and XS 29ers to get the front bars lower like on 26ers. Another disadvantage to riding a 28er would be tackled. Willow Koerber had to use some custom headset to get the flat bar lower. She could have used inverted risers with inverted stems and keep the ordinary headset and not shorteing the fork stroke down to 80-90mm like he had on superfly. Now let's think about 5'2" rider wanting a wfo9. If a 90mm fork is a borderline then a 140mm is 50mm above and we need to counter that additional 50mm by -35 stem and - 25mm riser.

    I reckon that it is great for small riders, it is better to have the front end this way rather than ride a 26er just in order to have typical 26er setup and ditch a 29er becuase of that.

    This solution is excellent for 36ers for almost everybody under 6' for the lowerness.

  24. #24
    nothing to see here
    Reputation: Stevob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,240
    Quote Originally Posted by rockcrusher View Post
    The only reason to design an upside down riser would be so that the brand sticker/model name was facing up instead of inverted which would be madness for any manufacturer to pursue strictly for the purpose of an upside down handlebar.
    Madness?
    I see hills.

    I want to climb them.

  25. #25
    nothing to see here
    Reputation: Stevob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwiffle View Post
    My question is why do some of the bikes have spacers under the stem, only to flip the stem and/or bar? Like the first pic - take out the spacers and you could run a normal stem, maybe in the down position, and it wouldn't look so odd.
    Some people, myself included, prefer the look of an inverted stem. Mine doesn't have spacers beneath it however.
    I see hills.

    I want to climb them.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by jgsatl View Post
    my back hurts just looking at that.
    SLAM THAT STEM

    Anyways, as a road biker that got turned onto mountain bikes, I can tell you that the low bars is very comfortable if done correctly. It allows more equal distribution of body weight onto your three contact points (ass, hands, feet). 100 miles with about 3 inches of saddle to bar drop is no problem for me. It's about rotating your hips, not bending at the waist. Your back should be relatively straight the whole time. Lets you get your center of gravity lower, lets you engage your glutes and hamstrings more fully, and makes you more aerodynamic.

    Winning.



  27. #27
    Professional Crastinator
    Reputation: Fleas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,128
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    The bikes present some "new" or innovative solution, though they are larges.
    I reckon that it is great for small riders, it is better to have the front end this way rather than ride a 26er just in order to have typical 26er setup and ditch a 29er because of that.

    This solution is excellent for 36ers (and 56ers ) for almost everybody under 6' for the lowerness.
    Lowerness?

    These bikes do look less sad, though.


    The ultimate in "lowerness" :


    -F

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    Pro Bike: Emily Batty's Trek Superfly Elite - BikeRadar


    Even so, Batty's position requires a few tweaks: the seatpost is flipped around to provide less setback and there's a -25 Bontrager Race Lite (instead of the usual RXL or RXXXL model) stem up front, sitting right atop the headset compression ring, with the upper cover removed to cut out a few millimeters of stack height.

    Solution to too much inverted stems and lack of upper cap. Stem -17 and dropper bars on a 100 fork. Is Trek stupid? It would offer a much better fit.


    Also updated the first post with this information.

  29. #29
    meow meow
    Reputation: b-kul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    10,622
    between you and the niner fork thread the 29er forum has gone to hell.

  30. #30
    Administrator Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    Pro Bike: Emily Batty's Trek Superfly Elite - BikeRadar


    Even so, Batty's position requires a few tweaks: the seatpost is flipped around to provide less setback and there's a -25 Bontrager Race Lite (instead of the usual RXL or RXXXL model) stem up front, sitting right atop the headset compression ring, with the upper cover removed to cut out a few millimeters of stack height.

    Solution to too much inverted stems and lack of upper cap. Stem -17 and dropper bars on a 100 fork. Is Trek stupid? It would offer a much better fit.


    Also updated the first post with this information.
    The reason for everything you mentioned here is weight. An inverted riser with a less inverted stem would weigh more than an uber lightweight bar and inverted road stem. Racers are bad as examples of anything as they will do most anything to shed weight. The more weight shed the easier it is to put things like fork lockouts back on. Racers: not your everyday old mountain bikers and what goes for them really doesn't go for everyone else.
    Try this: HTFU

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    So she needs either a -40 stem or a dropper bar with RXXXL model (which is 6 or 7 degress) to counter the upper cup upon installing.
    I'd like to see those done. I guess it would place more short persons on 29ers and make S size a proper fit without compromises.

  32. #32
    PSYCHOLUST
    Reputation: scyule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    483
    Quote Originally Posted by nolamonster View Post
    I would be concerned about the ergonomics of the upsidedown riser bars . Thats gotta wreak havoc on your wrists.
    This was my first thought.... Flipping a riser STEM ( and running a FLAT bar ) makes sence but the actual geometry of a riser bar would be a problem as it would now DROP to the ens rather than rise

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    That's why we need dedicated dropper bars not just flipped upside down riser bars. It is like with frames, the first one were elongated 26er frames to fit 29" wheels.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: boomn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,647
    Quote Originally Posted by scyule View Post
    This was my first thought.... Flipping a riser STEM ( and running a FLAT bar ) makes sence but the actual geometry of a riser bar would be a problem as it would now DROP to the ens rather than rise
    Different doesn't mean it's a problem. It still depends on personal preference but like myself and others have said: that bar angle can feel comfy and work well too.

  35. #35
    Administrator Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevob View Post
    Madness?
    alright not madness but I highly doubt we will see an easton bar with the logo upside down any time in the near future. I understand the ragley option, many people run their altbars upside down to get lower, although why they just didn't print a double logo like the Bend 2 bar from salsa is beyond me, flippable without the need for 2 logo-ed options.. Those Brits are crazy I guess.
    Try this: HTFU

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    104
    Wow, sure looks... funnily unfamiliar ! It's a way to solve the problem though.

    If I was stuck with this problem I'd just ask a custom frame builder to make me a custom drop stem (-50mm -60mm, whatever the f you want) that I'd use with a flat bar. Now super easy for every framebuilder to build custom stems as Paragon now builds & sells all the machined parts ready to be welded together in Steel and Ti for the weight weiners !!!

  37. #37
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,267
    D.C., are you "special needs"?

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    Attention a 5 feet short woman from Specialized is over the moon with her 29er and is a perfect candidate for an upside fown risers- dropper bars and inverted stems if she wanted to have a 140mm FS 29er. No way to go lower without these
    Specialized Womens 29ers At Roc D Azure France | 29er Online

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    102
    The bars are frowning for a reason : (

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by daves4mtb View Post
    I want to see Copperfield post a pic of a 36er with inverted ape hanger bars for really short people



  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,911
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    That looks fitted for a rider 6 feet tall. stack:810mm reach:410mm saddle2pedal:955mm
    Not particularly for "really short people"

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Andy Pancroft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    When we gaze at road handle bars it is ok and not sad or something on monstercross but when we see a mtb riser handlebar with flipped stem it is definitely not ok? I guess we all need to get used to it the way we did to 29ers overall. In extremities like a 5'2" dudette wanting a Lunchbox or Lenz PBJ we would need some king of cusion shield on the headset stack, however when the rider likes the 29er wheels and prefers them over 26ers then I see nothing against customizing the position. Why 29ers have to take after 26ers? They are different bikes apart from CS, wheel base etc. If it works on road bikes then why not on 29ers?

    I agree that handlebar designed to be used up may not always be exellent however if inverted risers were designed then it would be comfortable for the wrists. I guess Ninerbikes should include such handlears for extra small riders under 160cm as a sidenote not the one below. It is just an axample monstercross bars when headset is higher than grips.
    I would suggest that the inner/outer coagulation is proportionate to the weight of the inserted kanuter valve postulation perimeter function which is, of course, relative to the overall fit of the down-drafter dubulator seal and the upper function of the weighted concorso fixture. But, that is, again, only going to be feasible to the degree that seismic distribution can be achieved through wavelength distortion mechanism when properly joined to the hi-temp steel carbon fiber distillate filter that asserted force relative to the juncture indicated in the owners manual!!
    If you don't like the way I ride, stay on the road!!!

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by craigsj View Post
    That looks fitted for a rider 6 feet tall. stack:810mm reach:410mm saddle2pedal:955mm
    Not particularly for "really short people"
    Then add a dropper bars like -50mm and headset stack pad- cushion- a chin holder? A short person like 5'4" may dig it.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,774
    Hey shorties out there, flip the handlebar and enjoy the 29er as though you were 6'7".













    Last edited by Davidcopperfield; 12-17-2011 at 11:33 AM.

  45. #45
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post

  46. #46
    I live to bike
    Reputation: Jwiffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    Where could someone possibly ride a rigid ss that would necessitate dual front brakes? I've ridden mine in some pretty crazy places, but I'm sure the one on mine would be quite sufficient for the same place that person rides theirs.

    And are those road pedals on it?
    Stop in at Element Sports. www.elementsport.com
    Get Out! Have Fun!

  47. #47
    Trail Ninja
    Reputation: Varaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwiffle View Post
    Where could someone possibly ride a rigid ss that would necessitate dual front brakes? I've ridden mine in some pretty crazy places, but I'm sure the one on mine would be quite sufficient for the same place that person rides theirs.

    And are those road pedals on it?
    I took a good ~5 minute look at it. Doesn't seem to have road pedals and doesn't seem to be a rigid. Looks like old mtb cage pedals that could accept clips.

    - Dual disc brakes up front
    - Wide hub spacing up front
    - Thru-axle bolt up front?
    - Headtube that looks awfully small to fit a shock inside, which the rubber accordion boot seems to indicate
    - Hard to tell if the fork is raked out any
    - Adjustable stem with small clamp diameter on the bar?
    - Something next to the cyclometer on the bar
    - Thudbuster style suspension seatpost?
    - Pinch bolt on the frame to secure the seatpost? Def no room for a binder clamp.
    - Square taper BB and cranks in EBB?
    - No seat tube reinforcement for the BB? If it's steel with a DT that large, I guess it'll be alright.
    - Slack seat angle
    - Wider than normal rear hub spacing?
    - Bet it has quite a bit of toe overlap too

    Not sure what the reason is behind the front disc brakes. Looks like it's to split the braking forces and the stress on the fork and hub. The calipers are set opposing each other, so it clamps on the rotor so its resisting foward-upward rotation on the left side and resisting forward-downward rotation on the right side. The bike's probably pretty heavy too, so it would be better to have two than 1 with big rotor, considering its build.

  48. #48
    I live to bike
    Reputation: Jwiffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Varaxis View Post
    I took a good ~5 minute look at it. Doesn't seem to have road pedals and doesn't seem to be a rigid. Looks like old mtb cage pedals that could accept clips.

    - Dual disc brakes up front
    - Wide hub spacing up front
    - Thru-axle bolt up front?
    - Headtube that looks awfully small to fit a shock inside, which the rubber accordion boot seems to indicate
    - Hard to tell if the fork is raked out any
    - Adjustable stem with small clamp diameter on the bar?
    - Something next to the cyclometer on the bar
    - Thudbuster style suspension seatpost?
    - Pinch bolt on the frame to secure the seatpost? Def no room for a binder clamp.
    - Square taper BB and cranks in EBB?
    - No seat tube reinforcement for the BB? If it's steel with a DT that large, I guess it'll be alright.
    - Slack seat angle
    - Wider than normal rear hub spacing?
    - Bet it has quite a bit of toe overlap too

    Not sure what the reason is behind the front disc brakes. Looks like it's to split the braking forces and the stress on the fork and hub. The calipers are set opposing each other, so it clamps on the rotor so its resisting foward-upward rotation on the left side and resisting forward-downward rotation on the right side. The bike's probably pretty heavy too, so it would be better to have two than 1 with big rotor, considering its build.
    Whoops, missed the Headshock-style front suspension.

    Also noticed that it has a double up front (chain is on the smaller ring). Stop to manually shift and adjust rear wheel, I guess. May have a dingle out back, too.

    Pedals look like they offer no grip if they're not a clipless of some sort.

    Still think the dual discs are overkill.
    Stop in at Element Sports. www.elementsport.com
    Get Out! Have Fun!

  49. #49
    Administrator Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Jwiffle View Post
    Whoops, missed the Headshock-style front suspension.

    Also noticed that it has a double up front (chain is on the smaller ring). Stop to manually shift and adjust rear wheel, I guess. May have a dingle out back, too.

    Pedals look like they offer no grip if they're not a clipless of some sort.

    Still think the dual discs are overkill.
    I rode with bryan yesterday for awhile. The pedals are time Attack platforms. The front hub is something in the range of 200mm or so. The Dual brakes are because the wheels weigh something in the range of 12lbs each. That is a lot of rotating mass to slow down and the duals prevent torsion in the fork during braking. He rides to all the trails because the bike doesn't fit on bike racks ergo the dingle setup.

    Finally he rides all the trails in Tucson and AZ in general rigid and Single on that bike (which a lot of us do) and those include very technical descents with serious rock drops, boulder fields and fun. I had a hard time keeping up with him on my conventional 29er SS and it was through an easy very twisty turny singletrack in the desert. He is faster than most of us on a bike whose wheels alone weigh and much as our bike do alone.
    Try this: HTFU

  50. #50
    I live to bike
    Reputation: Jwiffle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,232
    Quote Originally Posted by rockcrusher View Post
    I rode with bryan yesterday for awhile. The pedals are time Attack platforms. The front hub is something in the range of 200mm or so. The Dual brakes are because the wheels weigh something in the range of 12lbs each. That is a lot of rotating mass to slow down and the duals prevent torsion in the fork during braking. He rides to all the trails because the bike doesn't fit on bike racks ergo the dingle setup.

    Finally he rides all the trails in Tucson and AZ in general rigid and Single on that bike (which a lot of us do) and those include very technical descents with serious rock drops, boulder fields and fun. I had a hard time keeping up with him on my conventional 29er SS and it was through an easy very twisty turny singletrack in the desert. He is faster than most of us on a bike whose wheels alone weigh and much as our bike do alone.
    Context is everything. This thread was about small 29ers with flipped bars and stems. Only after you mentioned the weight of the wheels did I realize I was not looking at a small 29er.
    Stop in at Element Sports. www.elementsport.com
    Get Out! Have Fun!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 29ers for short people
    By NicoleB in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 12-01-2011, 12:08 AM
  2. Show your huge 29ers 25" frames Candidates for 32&36ers?
    By Davidcopperfield in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-17-2008, 02:58 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-09-2007, 09:03 AM
  4. 29ers are yesterday, 36ers are the future
    By Clyde S Dale in forum Turner
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-17-2007, 10:50 AM
  5. Short Riders on 29ers?
    By trail topher in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 02-07-2006, 03:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •