Results 1 to 78 of 78
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382

    shimano pedals xt (780) vs xtr (980) vs Egg Beaters! Vs

    Was going to splurge on some new XTR pedals, they look awesome, but read reviews on mtbr, very MIXED!

    Very little on the XT's...

    input?


    NEW:

    Thinking about those Egg beaters now...good deal available on the TiTi (top of the line)
    Last edited by everything motorcycl; 12-17-2012 at 10:20 AM.

  2. #2
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    or do like i did
    get xpedo
    lighter than xtr, cheaper than xt
    win win

    love mine

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    never heard. Website? xtr are $145

  4. #4
    29er
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    859
    yeah i never heard of them either
    did some poking around, and they have favorable reviews
    i didn't think a pedal could make much difference, but i definitely noticed a smoother pedal stroke vs. the shimano 520 i had before

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GTscoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,321
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan GSR View Post
    i didn't think a pedal could make much difference, but i definitely noticed a smoother pedal stroke vs. the shimano 520 i had before
    I'm certifiably a clyde (~270lbs) and find Shimano 520s very flexy to pedal on. XT pedals come with a much stiffer axle and pedal a lot better because of it.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Thanks GT, I'm 100lbs less then you, so don't think I have to worry about the weight issue. I'm now looking into eggbeaters. Wanted to stay with same cleat, but I hear so many postive things about the CB's. I've got the $$$ so why not!??!

  7. #7
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702

    Double check them...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan GSR View Post
    or do like i did
    get xpedo
    lighter than xtr, cheaper than xt
    win win

    love mine
    ... but many XPedo pedals have a weight limit. Also, I've had several Wellgo pedals (same company) over the years fail on me just because the durlin bushing inside wears out. It took a lot of packing new grease in them to keep them turning quietly.

    Shimano uses cup and cone real ball bearings inside all of their pedals. Set, forget, spins forever. They're even user serviceable.

    Plus, the cleat mechanism is way smoother.

    Same goes for Eggbeaters. I know riders who wear out Eggbeaters in less than a year. One friend of mine bought several pair just so he has a set he can send back for service, like hot spares. He said Eggbeaters are the best pedals you will ever rent.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Seems like what I keep hearing Dan...BUT, there are so many poor reviews on the XTR's 980s! The ole, SetNForget seems to be forgotten!

    I have also noticed the XT's are available for 2013, but NOT the XTRs, maybe something in the works! I can live w a little nuisance of rebuild, just not downtime to BROKEN crap!

    Nobody has mentioned anything about the XTs hardly anywhere on the forums.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    236
    Personally, I run 540's with a Ti Spindle upgrade. Considerably less money than XTR's, more durable (so far), and only 3 grams heavier than my XTR 970's

    I prefer the SPD interface over anything else I've tried.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Did you prefer 970 over 540??? Many reviewers hated the upgrade from 970 to 980. Those eggbeaters look wild!

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    190
    Time ATAC. End of discussion, IMO

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    203
    I have a pair of XT Trail pedals. They're too new to really give any feedback other than they work nicely so far. A bit stronger of a click and less floaty than CB or Times. Previously I've had several pairs of Time ATAC's and CB Candies and Acids.

    Crank Brothers is hands down the worst junk that you can put on your bike. They have flashy anodizing and their stuff looks nice when new, but everything they make is garbage.

    If you want the feel of Crank Brothers, then do yourself a favor and pick up a pair of Times.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    ????? Please explain 'pick up a pair of TIME'?

    Also, XT mountain, any feedback??? I was considering going that route...really want something very nice, but XTRs are getting bad reviews. Any input on Xpedos? Also, getting really good feedback on eggbeaters, got any experience with them?

    Explain "floaty"?

    Thanks

    *love the input at mtbr, thanks guys! Always very helpful.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Did you prefer 970 over 540??? Many reviewers hated the upgrade from 970 to 980. Those eggbeaters look wild!
    I prefer the 540's, the entry and exit is smoother IMO. The 970's are very nice though, mine have stood up to some abuse.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    funny, I have them on there now, I do like em, but figured I'd try something fancier shmancier. I got the $$$ for em.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    236
    That makes the decision even easier in my book. Drop $50 for the Ti Spindles. Spending good money on the XTR to save a few grams is not worth it IMO, especially with the current mixed reviews.

    Now if you are interested in trying something other than an SPD, then the extra money might be worth it to you.

    If you do do the spindle swap, make sure you put the right spindle with the right pedal. You do not want to mix them up.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    ????? Please explain 'pick up a pair of TIME'?

    Also, XT mountain, any feedback??? I was considering going that route...really want something very nice, but XTRs are getting bad reviews. Any input on Xpedos? Also, getting really good feedback on eggbeaters, got any experience with them?

    Explain "floaty"?

    Thanks

    *love the input at mtbr, thanks guys! Always very helpful.
    Time ATAC's are the pedal that Crank Brother's ripped off when they got into the pedal making business. The clipped in feeling is the same, but CB ruined the easy entry design by marketing a 4-sided pedal entry as a good feature. In reality, the clips are always at a different angle to the pedal body (ie, the smarties, candies, acids, mallets) so you have to kick the clips around the pedal body to get the cleat engaged. In addition to the 4-sided non-feature, they bend, they break, and they wear out at an alarming rate. It sounds worse than it is, but if you come from the Time pedals, you'll soon realize how inferior the CB's are. If you've never owned a pair of Time's and preach about how great CB's are, well then you don't miss what you've never had.

    Floaty just means that you can twist your heel around a bit. The Shimano pedals feel a bit more locked into place, but they have adjustable tension, and I haven't used the new Shimano pedals enough to really say how they will do after a few months of riding.

  18. #18
    Don't be a sheep
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,380
    I have 10 years on eggbeaters and recently a year on Shimano XTR 980's and 540's. For ugly mud if you are getting off and running then getting back on your bike (think cyclocross racing) eggbeaters rule. For everything else the Shimano's are much better. I like the feel of the XTR's the best, it actually feels like I'm putting more power into the bike because the connection is so solid, something the eggbeaters lacked. 540's are the bargain of the century, almost as good as XTR's at a fraction of the cost.
    "Do not touch the trim"

  19. #19
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702
    Heh... I always pick up Shimano M959s (XTR grade before the branded them 'XTR') and the model right after them at swap meets. I always seem to find them at around $20. I'm hoarding them.

    I've been doing that for the last three or four years or so, and never had one fail on me.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    118
    I raced the current XT pedals all season. While it is only one season, I raced in plenty of mud and dust along with hitting plenty of things with the pedals when I thought I would clear and I did not. I really do not notice the pedals which is a very good thing. They do their job to the point I do not know they are there.

    I put them on, adjusted the tension and then raced hard. No complaints, they just do there job.

    Not the most helpful but no complaints what so ever.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382

    xtr vs xt

    Shimano's website BLOWS. Doesn't give specs well, can't compart xt vs xtr...what is the difference?!?

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,585
    Quote Originally Posted by ????? View Post
    Floaty just means that you can twist your heel around a bit. The Shimano pedals feel a bit more locked into place, but they have adjustable tension, and I haven't used the new Shimano pedals enough to really say how they will do after a few months of riding.
    And if you want the "floaty-est", then check out Speedplay Frogs.

    A very different pedal than the SPD or Time/Eggbeaters. No spring force, free float, good clearing ability and some of the lightest pedals out there. If you're under 180, you can get Ti spindles, even.

    I've been using them since 1998 and, after getting used to the different feel (about a month of riding), wouldn't ride anything else!

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    I'm a noob so take my advice with a grain of dirt.



    I ride the 530's because every now and then I'm not clipped in and want some sort of platform.

    The 540's sure look affordable now. Eggbeaters seem to get high marks of approval from mudmen, but I live in California and the only time we deal with mud is in a mudslide and then we always clip out and try to ride the bikes down by standing on top of them.



    Are the XTR's 3.6 times better than the 540's?
    Hank

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Shimano's website BLOWS. Doesn't give specs well, can't compart xt vs xtr...what is the difference?!?
    I think they failed to provide more details because it would be way too similar to the xt's. The XTR is more for the bling factor and a very minimal weight savings...not even worth mentioning. I'm not gonna lie...if money was no option I'd probably get either the XT or XTR for cosmetic purposes only. Im sure the entry and release is skightly improved...but only someone whose ridden all the shimano pedals for years would notice a difference. The 540 is hands down the best value in spd pedals. Basically the same as XT and XTR for a fraction of the price. I've beaten mine up for 3 years and they still run perfect. I demoed the trail versions with the platform but made no difference at all. Probably a good option for someone using a flexy shoe such as the 5.10 or skate shoe with cleats mount. If you have a very stiff soled shoes...I'd go with the non platform version.

    I just converted to the egg beaters strictly for the weight savings. I got the egg beater 3 along with the ti spindles. I saved a 1/4 pound in weight for less then XTR. Egg beaters will most benefit anyone who rides in muddy, snow conditions...along with people who need more float. Shimano have very little float. Anyone who does not like extra float will say it feels like your on ice. Completely personal preference. knee problems often require more float.

    The shimano minimal float has been causing me knee pains for years...but the design/entry and release is so darn awesome that ive delt with the pain. I'm gonna give the egg beaters a try for a season to see if I like them. So far so good....but if I have any issues I'll most definitely go back to the tried and proven shimanos. But please don't overlook the 540's! I wouldn't even waste your time on the 520, XT, or XTR until you get the 540s and put in some saddle time. They are truly a gem in the rough, don't let price discourage you. 540s plus ti spindle in theory should be as light as XTR...and much less money.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SleepeRst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    89
    I have had CB Candy SL's, my first clipless pedal. I loved them, rode for a year, but they got sloppy and a little stiff. The cleats were starting to wear so thats probably where the slop came in.

    Next I got the re-designed Look Quartz. I was hoping they would be similar to the Candy's at half cost. Rode on them twice, did not like them. They are adjusted fine with the shims, but when I power up tough technical descents, (I am singlespeed), one side seems un-clip every now and then which gets old. Plus they just don't feel that tight compared to the candy's.

    So **** em, I am joining the Shimano pedal wagon and hope to be here for the rest of my MTB journey. I am sick of buying pedals so I purchases the Shimano XT PD-M785, I hope these last for years and years and years. The pedal float of the other brands is overrated when you really need to put the power down and crank up a real climb.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    I've been very happy w my shimano 520s on their now. My goal, remove and put on my new road/hybrid bike...upgrade for my fav bike (mtb) w some xtr's, but those reviews blow on this forum. Going to price some XT's. If it ain't broke...

  27. #27
    Five is right out
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,174
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Was going to splurge on some new XTR pedals, they look awesome, but read reviews on mtbr, very MIXED!

    Very little on the XT's...

    input?


    NEW:

    Thinking about those Egg beaters now...good deal available on the TiTi (top of the line)
    Are you looking in the "reviews" section of MTBR or in the forums?

    The review section is generally to be ignored- the vast bulk of the reviews seem to be written by excitable halfwits or people who have never owned more than a single product and so have no basis for comparison. Opinions via the forum section tend to be a little more reliable.

    And if you read forum posts on pedals, you'd probably come to the opposite conclusion regarding Crankbros and Shimano pedals. The former has really variable QC (some pedals just explode for no reason, whilst others last for years) and can eject the rider on rock strikes, and the Shimanos tend to last forever.

    And then there is the Time camp- a bit heavier, but super reliable with good float and mud shedding.

    I've owned pedals by all three brands. I'd take Shimano or Time any day. I will never buy a Crank Bros product that's any more vital than a multitool (their multitools are surprisingly good).

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    When I see a nice bike out on the trail the last thing I look at is the pedals (if at all) To me bling on pedals is non-existent after the first ride. Either they work for you or they don't. It's not like you are riding a Cologno with a vintage Campagnolo "Gruppo. I say suck up the 5 grams and pocket the extra $100.

    Hank

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Yeah, looked at the reviews HERE...on mtbr...just seemed like 4 or 5 guys w very similar opinion...570 was better then their new 580s, 580s seemed to be giving them failure. But, really like my 520's so thinking I'm back to somwhere within shimanos again (also nice to have both my shoes compatible)...now, 540, xt or xtr,

    I know I said $$$ wasn't problem, but figure XT seem to be favorable on this thread...and save a few buck can never hurt

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    When I see a nice bike out on the trail the last thing I look at is the pedals (if at all) To me bling on pedals is non-existent after the first ride. Either they work for you or they don't. It's not like you are riding a Cologno with a vintage Campagnolo "Gruppo. I say suck up the 5 grams and pocket the extra $100.

    Hank
    and your recommended opinion hank?

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    and your recommended opinion hank?
    My advice: You only live once, buy what you want. You could always get the M540's for $45 then call Shimano and tell them the plastic blingy thingy's fell off your $165 XTR-980's (which at some point will become un-recognizable black plastic blurrs anyway) and when they arrive glue or screw them onto the 540's? (looks like the same dimension)



    Hank



    P.S. Oh that would be dishonest...never mind... and also please disregard my nonsensical humor. The 520's sure look nice and they get some solid reviews.
    Last edited by DirtyHank; 12-18-2012 at 10:44 AM.

  32. #32
    One Gear
    Reputation: .40AET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,063
    I have XT's on one bike and XTR's on the other. I can't tell the difference once I'm on the bike and riding. Go for whichever one floats your boat. I read a good article on the XT, XTR, and 540's. Basically, the weight and a slimmer profile is most of what separates the 3 pedals.

    I did ride Times for a couple years. They are super easy to get into and it doesn't matter how much snow or mud is on the cleat. As my skills advanced, I didn't find the retention to be strong enough. The cleats just released too easily while on the strongest setting. That's when I went back to Shimano.

    Good Luck!

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Quote Originally Posted by .40AET View Post
    I have XT's on one bike and XTR's on the other. I can't tell the difference once I'm on the bike and riding. Go for whichever one floats your boat. I read a good article on the XT, XTR, and 540's. Basically, the weight and a slimmer profile is most of what separates the 3 pedals.

    I did ride Times for a couple years. They are super easy to get into and it doesn't matter how much snow or mud is on the cleat. As my skills advanced, I didn't find the retention to be strong enough. The cleats just released too easily while on the strongest setting. That's when I went back to Shimano.

    Good Luck!
    Excellent, will likely be grabbing the XT's now

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    244
    I've had flat pedals, time atac, crank bro's, and most recently I tried some XT 785 pedals.

    I like flat pedals, but I don't think they are as efficient as clip ins. But they might be more fun.

    I liked the Times, but they didn't feel great under my feet for some reason, and they kind of bugged my knees. Used them 2 seasons.

    Had some cheap crank bros candy pedals. They worked pretty good. Easy to get in and out. Nice float. For a cheap pedal, it was a good deal.

    But then I bought the 785. Perfection for a spd pedal. I use them with multirelease cleats. Wicked easy to get out of. Easy to clip in. A bit of a platform if you need to unclip for whatever reason and pedal. I'll probably never switch pedals again, I like them that much ( unless I want to run flat pedals).

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    no to flats for me. Not sure why, but going w full XC pedal, the 780 vs 785, but def appreciate input. Was deadset on xtr's, then considered all the others...now looks like I'm back to shimano, but xt's. xtr seems to have some bearing reliability issue...

    but no rhyme or reason. really appreciate all the input.

    shame, called two of my lbs and they won't budge off msrp...hmmmm, support lbs and pay DOUBLE?

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    89
    I have the XT's. If I had to buy new pedals right now, I'd buy the M540's as I cant tell a difference between them and the XT's. I'd put the $40 difference else where.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    getting a lot of that, get the 540. 4 grams not much...unless you are a drug dealer lol.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Sundragon, did you upgrade from 540s???

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SleepeRst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Nail Every Trail View Post

    But then I bought the 785. Perfection for a spd pedal. I use them with multirelease cleats. Wicked easy to get out of. Easy to clip in. A bit of a platform if you need to unclip for whatever reason and pedal. I'll probably never switch pedals again, I like them that much ( unless I want to run flat pedals).
    I am glad you like these as I just bought them! Have you ran them without the multi-release cleats? I am really hoping this can be my "last" pedal.

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Sundragon, did you upgrade from 540s???
    I actually bought the XT's after having problems with Egg Beaters. The XT"s felt nice, very solid engagement vs the egg beaters. I then spent some time riding a friends bike who had the 540's and I couldnt tell anything different. So, when I bought a second bike, I bought a set of the 540's for it, still couldnt tell the difference.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Shimano.com doesn't tell what spindle material except the 540s (chromoly). Wondering if the XT's have the titantium or xtrs do? Lame 0.0 on their website

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by Nail Every Trail View Post
    But then I bought the 785. Perfection for a spd pedal. I use them with multirelease cleats. Wicked easy to get out of. Easy to clip in. A bit of a platform if you need to unclip for whatever reason and pedal. I'll probably never switch pedals again, I like them that much ( unless I want to run flat pedals).


    I prefer that style of pedal. I really like my M-530's. The XT-PDM785's look very nice as well doubt that they feel/function any differently (probably a little lighter) but they is got an "X" and a "T" and despite my feelings I too appreciate the little things.

    Happy Pedaling,

    Hank

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    DONE! Just bought the XT's...$20 more then the 540s...only draw back MAY be if they are an offshoot of the xtr's and have the reliability issue. 540s look sweet, and looked nice. Now I just need to learn how to ride, any opinions? (-;

    Thanks again for the extraordinary discussion, explanations, and opinions! Suppppper helpful. I'm stoked (for a freakin pedal...you know you are a gearhead when...)

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    DONE! Just bought the XT's...$20 more then the 540s...only draw back MAY be if they are an offshoot of the xtr's and have the reliability issue. 540s look sweet, and looked nice. Now I just need to learn how to ride, any opinions?
    Hi everything,

    Who did you buy them from and how much $$$

    As far as "Now I just need to learn how to ride" goes, that tells me you are not familiar with clipping in and more importantly clipping out. Being a noob, my general rule of thumb is "If you are not moving forward, you are moving sideways which in simple language means "You are going down" When I first started clipping in it was on my road bike on my trainer and what I found out was the muscles used to twist my heels outward were muscles I really hadn't developed. I worked at it for a while and yes on my first ride I started too slow stalled and went down. I guess the good thing about MTB is that for the most part you can get to fall on dirt instead of concrete, the bad part is as you progress dirt can become rocks and a flat dirt roads can become knife edged ridges. You definitely want to develop skills and not exceed your limitations. Take it easy is a good policy, when in doubt walk it is another. Take a beginners course. Ride with a Group (there's always someone that can use your advice and there will be others with more advanced skills to help advance yours)

    There is a lot to know about MTB'ing In my opinion, much more so than road biking. Nothing will teach you more than time in the saddle. It doesn't hurt to learn through reading and it hurts a whole lot less crashing in your mind while reading a book in bed.

    My book should be getting here soon:



    I'm sure other guys will have some good recommendations as well.

    Happy "XT" Pedaling

    Hank

    P.S. Click on my Avatar picture and try to figure it out. Hint it is party a result of not clipping out fast enough and partly not applying the "If in doubt walk it" rule.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Was just kidding about the learning how to ride. Couldn't imagine not knowing how to ride a bike then going with clip pedals.

    Called my lbs to buy, I spend tons of dough w them, would be nice if they would just off a 10-15% discount. I'd consider. I got them for less then HALF of what they wanted. ebay.new.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    416
    I race on XTs with Ti spindles - lighter than XTR for the same money

  47. #47
    My gloves stink
    Reputation: Appendage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,472

    Don't like my 980s

    After years of riding on older XT and XTR pedals, I bought a new pair of 980s. I wish I had read the reviews first, but it didn't even occur to me that they would be anything other than great. But the new pedals don't float freely like the old ones. There's a lot of "stiction" between the shoe outsole and the platform. Not happy.
    I dreamed I ate a 10 lb marshmallow. When I awoke, my pillow was gone.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    broadway, which model xt's are you on???

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DirtyHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by broadwayline View Post
    I race on XTs with Ti spindles - lighter than XTR for the same money
    Pray tell me where does one get Titanium Spindles...TBay?

    All kidding aside...I'm Serious,

    Thanks,

    Hank

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    THey are on Evil Bay. Shame is, I don't know what comes with XTR or XT's as they don't list it on their website. That said, 540s plus spindles look like one great set up. I elected for the XTs, will keep you posted.

    Anyone know if the XT's come w ti?

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Ti Spindles...so I got my sweeetness in! excited to change em...BUT, how do you change spindles...don't wanna screw my pedals up...there is a nut that looks like it should be removed, input would be appreciated!

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    420
    XTR for $120 on chain reaction
    I've had them on my TB for a yr now, NO problems. I weigh 170

  53. #53
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702
    I dunno... I'm not sure ti spindles are all that. You blow $50 to shed what... 15 grams? Seems like an expensive way to save weight.

    Plus, the ebay cadence magnet won't stick to it.

    Plus, I've seen the posts where folks broke off the threaded tips of these things.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by pimpbot View Post
    I dunno... I'm not sure ti spindles are all that. You blow $50 to shed what... 15 grams? Seems like an expensive way to save weight.
    It is not a lot of weight that you save, but the price of 540's with Ti spindles is about $50-$75 less than XTR's alone, and the weight is nearly the same. So IMO it is a better option, and worth the $50 upgrade.

    XT's with Ti, cost about the same as XTR, and they should weigh slightly less than the XTR's. Still a great option, but perhaps not as much bang for the buck.

  55. #55
    One Gear
    Reputation: .40AET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,063
    Spend the extra money on lighter tires.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    416
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyHank View Post
    Pray tell me where does one get Titanium Spindles...TBay?

    All kidding aside...I'm Serious,

    Thanks,

    Hank
    I am using these; http://www.ebay.ca/itm/170889392756?...#ht_603wt_1163

    XT spindles are heavier than XTR as well

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    There IS an American company making them (Ti Spindles). How do you get the current spindles out?

  58. #58
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    There IS an American company making them (Ti Spindles). How do you get the current spindles out?
    You can probably find an exploded view on the interwebs somewhere, but basically the spindle/bearing assembly unscrews from the pedal body. You put the body in a vise (don't crush it, just to hold it still) and you take a wrench to the hex thingy where the spindle goes in. That hex thing contains the bearing races, cups, cones, spindle and everything. Once you take that out, you can disassemble the cup and cone bearings and move the whole thing over to the Ti spindle.

    *edit*

    Oh, I forgot. Some pedals use a big hex thing to unscrew the spindles, some use a funky splined thing that takes this special tool:


  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Thanks Pimbot, that 'hex thingy' is what I figured...but forgot about those bearing...will let my lbs change em.

    I really wanna put my new xt's in NOW, but w a race in the a.m., w my luck they will fail or something will go wrong. Will put them in after race and hope to have .01 seconds off my lap times due to unsprung weight savings (-:

  60. #60
    @trailgrinder
    Reputation: Live2rideUtah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    422
    I have been happy with my egg beaters, I have ridden them since 02 and have had no problems with quality or entrance or exits from them. I may venture into the xt's when my current pair decides to give up the ghost but for me the eggbeaters have been pretty bullet proof. I do like that they are light but that has never been a reason for me to choose one vs another.

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Agreed Live. I'm assuming one should pick and use what they WANT. Unless you are a National competitor, can't even imagine that 20-50 grams makes a difference.

  62. #62
    @trailgrinder
    Reputation: Live2rideUtah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    422
    I know weight and rotational weight is a big deal but I always figure I could loose 2 pounds off my ass first. My biggest thing is durability, if I can keep the weight down and not have to worry about seizing a pedal up in the back country al, is good. So it sounds as the xt's are pretty close to the xtr's and a little lighter on the pocket. For some reason I get all warm and funny when I see the xtr's and fall into the marketing and pay extra myself. One thing I can say is cool that crank brothers did this year was the buy back program, send in your old eggbeaters regardless of shape and get a new set of 2's for $60.00. Pretty good deal especially if you had an old set sitting in a box like I did.



    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    THey are on Evil Bay. Shame is, I don't know what comes with XTR or XT's as they don't list it on their website. That said, 540s plus spindles look like one great set up. I elected for the XTs, will keep you posted.

    Anyone know if the XT's come w ti?
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Agreed Live. I'm assuming one should pick and use what they WANT. Unless you are a National competitor, can't even imagine that 20-50 grams makes a difference.

  63. #63
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,702

    Yeah, good move

    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Thanks Pimbot, that 'hex thingy' is what I figured...but forgot about those bearing...will let my lbs change em.

    I really wanna put my new xt's in NOW, but w a race in the a.m., w my luck they will fail or something will go wrong. Will put them in after race and hope to have .01 seconds off my lap times due to unsprung weight savings (-:
    I personally don't change anything important two weeks before a race, especially drivetrain. I want at least two or three good rides on anything new before I trust that it's solid enough to race on.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    Live2, great success, so why switch? Just to try?

    Yeah, had my first 2 lap race today...kept old peds on...I have to learn to control my starts...I keep gassing after about 15 min...then after about another 15 min, I get my legs back.

    It is a motorcycle 'thing'. I see racers, I like to pass (-: On a motorcycle, you pass, your gone

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    938

    Xt vs XTR vs

    I have always been an XTR fan but switched to CB Candys. The candys have a more consistant release when riding in fine dirt aka Moab red sand. Than the XTRs. The orig. Cands had weak seals and needed rebuilds more often, the new CBs are much better. You need to replace the cleats if you ride alot, about 1 a year for me.

  66. #66
    @trailgrinder
    Reputation: Live2rideUtah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    Live2, great success, so why switch? Just to try?

    Yeah, had my first 2 lap race today...kept old peds on...I have to learn to control my starts...I keep gassing after about 15 min...then after about another 15 min, I get my legs back.

    It is a motorcycle 'thing'. I see racers, I like to pass (-: On a motorcycle, you pass, your gone
    Yeah I would only switch it up for fun, of course keeping the egg beaters around but I will never know if I'm missing ou on something ifi don't give it a whirl.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    416
    For anyone interested I saved 50g by swapping my XT spindles to Ti for $50 - and XTR and XT spindles are interchangeable.

    Brought them down to 289g

  68. #68
    .44
    Reputation: stremf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,220
    I've got a set of XT pedals that are 15 years old still going strong. There is a big chunk missing out of one of the cages from falling off the car going 80mph. Still butter smooth. Service is super easy and takes literally 5 min. I've got a bunch of 540's and another pair of XTR's. No issues with any of them through all these years of abuse.

    I'd like to someday try out another set of pedals, but at this point, I'm not going to try and fix something that's not broken.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    382
    I hear ya stremf...

    For all...just installed, really like, but very honest...I mtb 3 x a week for last 8 months...so fairly new to sport but have athletic background.

    I couldn't see ANY benefit from my New XT's vs my 520s!!! Maybe 520s a bit better broken in...not sure if there is such thing as 'break in' on them. BUT: there is DEF less float on XTs. Very little in comparison to my 520s...I prefer a bit of float...so hoping that maybe when spindle works in, will have a touch.

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    193
    I've had egg beaters and just didn't like the feel of the pedal under my shoe. Used Time Atacs for about 5-6 years when Shimano's weren't known for shedding mud as well. Originally switched to XTR's because they were cheaper and lighter than the high end times. Had 2 sets of those and the only reason I stopped using the second pair was my fault because I let them get seized in a crank arm on a winter bike and cracked the threads trying to remove them. Raced everything from XC to 4X on them. No problems. The reason I have XT pedals is I was about 2 days out from a race and needed to buy pedals to replace the XTR's I'd messed up and XT's where the only pedals in stock. I don't notice a real difference between the 2 pedals. I think it's like a 30 gram weight difference. You can see the quality difference between the 540's and 520's though. If you can get XTR's for like $150 though do it.

  71. #71
    May contain nuts
    Reputation: Haggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,049
    After riding Time XS for years, I'm now on XT Trail.
    The good: more shoe support means less roll and flex, especially when using softer-soled shoes, but even with hard XC shoes it's noticeable.
    The not-so-good: less heel float before unclip than Time, which makes for entertaining no-footers when deploying a bit of jump-style . (Currently trying to teach myself flats to learn proper foot/pedal/air technique)

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    208
    i went through this debate not long ago, I ultimately ended up with the shimano m540's.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    208
    nashbar or pricepoint usually have good prices on them. ( Edit: )

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by Haggis View Post
    The not-so-good: less heel float before unclip than Time, which makes for entertaining no-footers when deploying a bit of jump-style . (Currently trying to teach myself flats to learn proper foot/pedal/air technique)
    I think every one should spend some time on flats. I think it adds a little extra to peoples skill sets. Dirt Rag had an article on riding flats in the summer.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    271
    The best value for money pedal I ever used was/is the Shimano M540. The "problem" with these is that they last forever. You can only "upgrade" to slightly lighter. Not better.

  76. #76
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,605
    Quote Originally Posted by everything motorcycl View Post
    I hear ya stremf...

    For all...just installed, really like, but very honest...I mtb 3 x a week for last 8 months...so fairly new to sport but have athletic background.

    I couldn't see ANY benefit from my New XT's vs my 520s!!! Maybe 520s a bit better broken in...not sure if there is such thing as 'break in' on them. BUT: there is DEF less float on XTs. Very little in comparison to my 520s...I prefer a bit of float...so hoping that maybe when spindle works in, will have a touch.
    Hope they work out for you and "loosen up a bit" over time. Nothing wrong with Shimano pedals over the long haul. They just work. I've got the 520's on my Karate Monkey SS. Not as much float as my Xpedo pedals, but c'est la vie. I've got an equivalent pair of old Shimano clipless pedals I bought in 2002 that are still going strong (they are on my exercise bike in the basement). 10 years of non-stop functioning - hard to beat!

    The first reply to your original post (made by Dan_GSR) was - IMO - the golden ticket pedal suggestion for you in this entire thread. Xpedo. I've been running them for years with zero problems on multiple bikes. Love the 6 degree float as well. The Ti/Ti Xpedo pedals (M-Force 8) weigh a mere 215g and have been perfect. I've got 3 pairs of them, and 1 pair of the chromoly I bought back in 2005 and is still going strong. The chromoly model I bought is the equivalent of today's M-Force-3's that weigh around 312g. Although a more unknown pedal brand compared to Eggs and Shimano - these Xpedo pedals just work like a charm and are a great product.

    I went to the M-Force 8 (Ti/Ti) pedal on my JET 9 which I built out a bit weight weenie like a couple of years ago. I had the fancy Eggbeater light pedals on my new JET that had a cage snap and break in the middle of a race. I didn't even hit anything!!! Crank Brothers fixed them without much hassle, but after I got them back from CB service they are still sitting in the box on my parts table. I don't want to ride with a product that can just "break" while riding along. So I went to the M-Force 8's and haven't looked back.

    Nice review here.

    Too late for this time around, but next time around Xpedo is absolutely worth a serious look. Best pedals I've owned when you combine weight, function, price, and performance. If you shop around, it's not hard to find the M-Force 8 (Ti/Ti) pedal for $180 - $205. They remain my favorite pedal.
    Last edited by BruceBrown; 12-30-2012 at 06:14 AM.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    416
    Are the Xpedo hard to clip into? I bought a set of light weight SPD Ritchey V5 pedals and they were horrible to clip into. The 'square' design made it easy to think you were clipping in but your cleat was actually on the end of the pedal vs the flat since they were the same length.

    If that isn't a problem I definitely want to try the Xpedos

  78. #78
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,605
    Quote Originally Posted by broadwayline View Post
    Are the Xpedo hard to clip into? I bought a set of light weight SPD Ritchey V5 pedals and they were horrible to clip into. The 'square' design made it easy to think you were clipping in but your cleat was actually on the end of the pedal vs the flat since they were the same length.

    If that isn't a problem I definitely want to try the Xpedos
    They are easier than the Shimano pedals to clip into and the more open cages allow for much easier clipping into when you have mud, snow or whatever on the bottom of your shoe around the clips. Like I said - they are a great product and the review I linked above pretty much nailed it. They are a "surprise" in a good way.

    Just don't have the huge brand recognition that Shimano and Crank Brothers does. It's fun to find a "surprise" product like a Syntace stem, an IRD FireXC Pro, an Xpedo pair of pedals, or a KMC chain etc.... that might be a bit more off the beaten path.

    BB

Members who have read this thread: 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •