Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 300 of 1125

Thread: Trek Sawyer

  1. #201
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by 202cycle
    So far, there is no SS only right dropout, so we may just have to cut the hanger off.
    You need the dropout from a Rig or SS Marlin. They use the same dropouts as the Sawyer.

  2. #202
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    497
    Unfortunately, you would have to purchase a Rig or SS Marlin to get the dropout. Trek has a part number, but no part, not even in the warranty dept.

  3. #203
    mtbr member
    Reputation: murtaghstyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    280
    JHK's proto belt drive sawyer:

  4. #204
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    497
    Do you have a link where I can see more of those photos, or is that the only one?

  5. #205
    mtbr member
    Reputation: murtaghstyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    280
    That one came from JHKs twitter feed, no more info on it.

  6. #206
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tw3nty9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    175

    me no hate the crivitz

    just came back to say that I finally threw on the stock crivitz bars with lock-on grips and I absolutely love how they feel on this bike. actually, it felt like an entirely new bike compared to when i had the carbon syntace bars and ergon grips. the shape of the crivitz feels similar to these old school bars on my ross, which i like a lot. this is how the sawyer is suppose to ridden, imo.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-img_0859.jpg  

    Trek Sawyer-img_1875.jpg  


  7. #207
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    293
    i had my crivitz set up with a 110mm stem and swapped out for an 80mm stem, same rise-17degree, felt just right, this was coming from lo-rise bonty RL.
    The secret to mountain biking is pretty simple. The slower you go the more likely it is you'll crash.

  8. #208
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    44
    Mine is in
    Going to wait till after Christmas to pic it up.
    I want to wait and see what Santa gets me.
    21" 30.05lbs on the Park scale.
    Bone stock complete with all reflectors.

  9. #209
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    just came back to say that I finally threw on the stock crivitz bars with lock-on grips and I absolutely love how they feel on this bike. actually, it felt like an entirely new bike compared to when i had the carbon syntace bars and ergon grips. the shape of the crivitz feels similar to these old school bars on my ross, which i like a lot. this is how the sawyer is suppose to ridden, imo.

    So the Ergons didn't work too good off-road on a rigid fork? I have a set of Bontrager XXX grips on right now and they are way too thin for a rigid fork...I was thinking ESI Chunkys but they are a PIA to take off once on, so while in the experimentation stage (making the choice between keeping the TruVativ that is currently installed or the Crivitz), I want a grip that goes on and comes off fairly easily. The stock lock-ons are super hard and suck even with a suspension fork....I was thinking a set of the Ergon GP-1 Biocork.

    -r

  10. #210
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PoisonDartFrog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    656
    ODI Rogue gets high marks

  11. #211
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    199
    picked up my 21" yesterday. Quadzilla81 is dead on, stock 30lbs. as expected,she is a TANK! i suspect it would be pretty easy to lighten up if you wanted. wheelset felt heavy when i was changing the rubber. after noticing the weight, i noticed it is looooong! the wheelbase is 45.5". i dont know, that may not be all that long, but my regular trail bike is a custom Black Cat singlespeed which has a wheelbase of 42" and is just over 23lbs. so this is noticeably a different beast...as i expected.

    so i changed out the rubber, the saddle, the seatpost, the stem, the grips, and the handlebars (look for all the take-offs in the mtbr classifieds soon!). this is not gonna be a trail bike for me, it will be my casual around town bike that may see me drop it off on some urban trails now and then for short blast to get the heart rate humming. it could make a good 'trainer' bike, if i got in shape running this up the steep hills, i could really make the 6 lbs lighter Black Cat scream up hill!

    so it is heavy and it is long...but it still has cool feel and ride to it. i cant help but think of a leatherman tool when i ride it...while it may not be the best tool for the job, it is capable of doing alot of things when you are in a pinch. cool retro look, can easily go singlespeed, and can even go belt drive if you wanna give that a shot! i suspect the "potential" is a big selling point for most people on this bike, and i doubt too many people are buying it as thier primary trail ride.

    the 8th grader in me thinks of it kinda like a 'Fat Chick' of the bike world...while you may not want her to be your ONLY girlfriend, she does have a great personality and is alot of fun to have around.

    ...i better stop after that remark.

  12. #212
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    just came back to say that I finally threw on the stock crivitz bars with lock-on grips and I absolutely love how they feel on this bike. actually, it felt like an entirely new bike compared to when i had the carbon syntace bars and ergon grips. the shape of the crivitz feels similar to these old school bars on my ross, which i like a lot. this is how the sawyer is suppose to ridden, imo.

    So the Ergons didn't work too good off-road on a rigid fork? I have a set of Bontrager XXX grips on right now and they are way too thin for a rigid fork...I was thinking ESI Chunkys but they are a PIA to take off once on, so while in the experimentation stage (making the choice between keeping the TruVativ that is currently installed or the Crivitz), I want a grip that goes on and comes off fairly easily. The stock lock-ons are super hard and suck even with a suspension fork....I was thinking a set of the Ergon GP-1 Biocork.

    -r

  13. #213
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    Quote Originally Posted by oclvframe
    So the Ergons didn't work too good off-road on a rigid fork? I have a set of Bontrager XXX grips on right now and they are way too thin for a rigid fork...I was thinking ESI Chunkys but they are a PIA to take off once on, so while in the experimentation stage (making the choice between keeping the TruVativ that is currently installed or the Crivitz), I want a grip that goes on and comes off fairly easily. The stock lock-ons are super hard and suck even with a suspension fork....I was thinking a set of the Ergon GP-1 Biocork.

    -r
    Ergon grips work just fine on a rigid bike, but that said if you didn't like the Ergon grips, changing to the GP-1 BioKork won't change your mind. They feel nearly identical to the regular GP-1's.

    If you want a cushy, larger grip, there is no better choice than a good ol' Oury grip.

    I also like Ergon GA-1's which do not have the paddle shape. They work well for aggressive riding and single speed.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  14. #214
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    28
    Just picked my Sawyer up last night and love it so far great design and super comfortable. I also didn't like the stock grips, swapped them out for ODI rouges. Excellent grip, soft and real easy to take on and off. Have them on my singlespeed also and never had an issue.

  15. #215
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    179
    Just built mine up 17.5". It's a frame only build and will be run singlespeed. It's right around 22lbs complete, only missing a chain (waiting for bike shop to open tomorrow for a new chain). That's acceptable for me. The only things I kept on it were the frame and handlebar.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-sawyer-no-chain.jpg  

    Last edited by smoen81; 12-25-2010 at 02:36 PM.

  16. #216
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by PoisonDartFrog
    ODI Rogue gets high marks
    I was at my local shop searching out some ODI Rogues....found them. While looking at them, I was talking to a couple of the shop guys to get their opinions. The Rogues were definitely far more rubbery feeling than the stock grips or many other lock-ons. As we talked, though, I asked about good ole Oury grips. Well, as luck would have it, they had both the regular Ourys and a set of lock-on Oury....now the dilemma...the Rouges or the Ourys. Well, I went for the Ourys since I've always had good luck with them. As I was swapping everything over last night, I went to open the package and guess what....the Oury lock-ons are made by none-other than ODI! They're basically nothing more than the ODI Rouge with the traditional Oury block style. Win-Win!

    I have yet to go off road with the Crivitz handlebar....initial impression around the street is that they'll be comfy although they've increased my reach a bit. I'll know for sure as soon as the rain lets up and I get a chance to trail test them.

    Thanks for all the grip suggestions!!

    -r

  17. #217
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    44
    Ok, Weight weenies look away now. This is not for the light hearted.

    Just stripped down my 21" and here are the weights.
    A bit more than I had expected
    21" frame 7lbs 12oz.
    Matching fork 2lbs 13oz.
    This going to be my road warrior so that is fine with me.
    I just cannot get into the skinny tired road bike thing.
    I have some 2.35" Big Apples for this baby.
    Just got in my P35 rims. and I am thinking of running the Alfine 8spd.

  18. #218
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    248
    Retro coolness sure weighs a lot

  19. #219
    You know my steez...
    Reputation: BunnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    Just built mine up 17.5". It's a frame only build and will be run singlespeed. It's right around 22lbs complete,........
    I'd love to see your bike on a scale...Quadzilla81's frame and fork alone came out to 10lbs 9 ozs. His is much bigger though.
    I'm unique, just like everyone else....

  20. #220
    Now wr rollin on a Boom!
    Reputation: archtop44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    282
    ^ ^ ^ ^ Yes it does.

    21" frame 7lbs 12oz.
    Matching fork 2lbs 13oz.

    oof.

    whelll... it is a whole bike, geared and disc'ed for $1400...
    "I think it's cool how the best line is also usually the most beautiful line" --Kurt F, Tamarancho, Safety Meeting

  21. #221
    tl1
    tl1 is offline
    Bicyclist
    Reputation: tl1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,851

    Holy Moly

    Quote Originally Posted by Quadzilla81
    Ok, Weight weenies look away now. This is not for the light hearted.

    Just stripped down my 21" and here are the weights.
    A bit more than I had expected
    21" frame 7lbs 12oz.
    Matching fork 2lbs 13oz.
    This going to be my road warrior so that is fine with me.
    I just cannot get into the skinny tired road bike thing.
    I have some 2.35" Big Apples for this baby.
    Just got in my P35 rims. and I am thinking of running the Alfine 8spd.
    I had a 18" Surly Instigator for years and the frame weighed, if memory serves, around six and a half pounds. It was a super fun bike but the weight did get annoying after awhile especially after riding other sturdy steel bikes a pound lighter. Seven and a three quarter pounds is really surprising even considering it's a larger frame and a 29 incher. I'm sure it will still be a super fun and great riding frame in the application you're planning though. It'll probably be sturdy enough to remain dent-free and to survive the 2012 megapocalypse too.

  22. #222
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OmaHaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    639
    I don't want to be a total buzz-kill... but at this weight, at the price... what is the value other than the "cool" factor?

  23. #223
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,800
    Quote Originally Posted by OmaHaq
    I don't want to be a total buzz-kill... but at this weight, at the price... what is the value other than the "cool" factor?
    Good question, but custom makers like Retrotec have niches making bikes like this, so someone's buying them. Time will tell if it's big enough for Trek to bother.

  24. #224
    get down!
    Reputation: appleSSeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,183
    it's just a bike man, just like women, different strokes for different folks
    Rudy Projects look ridiculous

    visit my blog, BEATS, BIKES & LIFE

  25. #225
    Devo
    Reputation: SelfPropelledDevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,617
    Quote Originally Posted by schnee
    Good question, but custom makers like Retrotec have niches making bikes like this, so someone's buying them. Time will tell if it's big enough for Trek to bother.
    this guy on my Hunter at SOC '08
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-img_0271.jpg  

    www.AsanaCycles.com
    "Bicycle Lifestyle, realized." D.G.

  26. #226
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    Originally posted by SelfPropelledDevo: this guy on my Hunter at SOC '08
    It should be noted that Rick Hunter has been noted as being one of Gary Fisher's favorite custom builders. So, I can totally see why he admired your bike. (I have always liked it as well)

    I'm sure Gary has always had a soft spot for cruiser designs since he got his feet wet mountain biking on a Schwinn. This sort of design has popped up here and there in Fisher's line throughout the years, which may reinforce that idea for some. It certainly has for me.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  27. #227
    Devo
    Reputation: SelfPropelledDevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,617
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted
    It should be noted that Rick Hunter has been noted as being one of Gary Fisher's favorite custom builders. So, I can totally see why he admired your bike. (I have always liked it as well)

    I'm sure Gary has always had a soft spot for cruiser designs since he got his feet wet mountain biking on a Schwinn. This sort of design has popped up here and there in Fisher's line throughout the years, which may reinforce that idea for some. It certainly has for me.
    absolutely
    with the notions of 18lb rigid 29ers
    carbon
    and the thought of a double top tubed bike with a glove box, complete with stainless steel tumble lock a-la-briefcase style... perhaps a tweed lining...
    come on! you know the style begs for the tech

    I suppose a full rigid carbon 29er, disc brakes, locking glove box... urban/dirt/touring do it all.

    I can only hope
    www.AsanaCycles.com
    "Bicycle Lifestyle, realized." D.G.

  28. #228
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    85

    Chain Tensioner Bolt??

    Hey guys, the sawyer is a nice looking bike. Does it have a bolt for tensioning the chain??

    Thanks.

  29. #229
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by BunnV
    I'd love to see your bike on a scale...Quadzilla81's frame and fork alone came out to 10lbs 9 ozs. His is much bigger though.

    If this means anything I'll post my build list then, I'll try to snap a scale photo.

    Frame: Trek sawyer
    Fork: black sheep Ti The fork is about half the weight of the stock fork
    headset: Chris king pewter
    Seatpost: black sheep Ti
    Wheelset: Stans 355 built to Dt 240's
    Tires: Schwalbe RR and Kenda Karma run tubeless
    Crank: XTR 970 Cermikoat (grey)
    Stem: Bontrager Race X lite Ceramikoat grey http://www.ceramikoat.com/ for the stem and cranks
    Handle bar: crivits
    Grips: easy Foam
    Brakes: Paul love levers, and Avid BB7's
    pedals: shimano XT
    Saddle: Brooks Swift Ti
    Chain: Sram 8 speed
    Skewers: front is Controltech Ti and rear is KCNC Ti
    Chainring is a blackspire 34t and Cog is a Niner 20t
    Bolts are all ti

    I just weighed it with the 8speed chain added and new sealant added to both tires, it weighs 23lbs 3oz
    Last edited by smoen81; 01-03-2011 at 07:54 PM.

  30. #230
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by dirt-nerd
    Hey guys, the sawyer is a nice looking bike. Does it have a bolt for tensioning the chain??

    Thanks.
    Yes, It has a split drop out on the drive side (For belt drive) and both sides have a sliding dropout design. with built in tensioners.

  31. #231
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    179
    For BunnV Here's a photo of the scale weight after chain and sealant added. As i said above around 22lbs was without the Chain, sorry if the way i wrote it made it seem as though it was 22lbs complete. I only have my iphone for photos, so this is about the best photo I can get with the phone focusing on the scale, anything further away you can't read the scale at all.

    Right now I'm trying to figure out how to work out a rattle that is within the center horizontal tube. The tube doesn't appear to be open on the ends, so whatever got in their was during welding, and it rattles if I move the bike vertical. Just a little annoyance.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-sawyer-weight.jpg  


  32. #232
    You know my steez...
    Reputation: BunnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    For BunnV Here's a photo of the scale weight after chain and sealant added. As i said above around 22lbs was without the Chain, sorry if the way i wrote it made it seem as though it was 22lbs complete...
    No need to apologize smoen81 . 23lbs is definitely "around" 22lbs. Either way, your bike is sweet. Thanks for the pictures. Now I know whatís possible with a Sawyer.
    I'm unique, just like everyone else....

  33. #233
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    44
    Test fit my cranks with the new spindle.
    I think they will work with the retro theme.
    Needs different bolts though.

  34. #234
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WindWithMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    227
    Had a chance to ride the Sawyer the other day,and was honestly shocked. I thought it would feel clunky,harsh,and slow,but knew after a quick loop around the block that it would be my next bike. It feels long,but rides quick.

  35. #235
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    179
    anyone have any suggestions on how to get at the middle horizontal tube. I've tried everything to try and get at it. I'm trying to get a small piece of metal or something out from inside the tube and have had no luck so far. It's been down to the frame and shaken over and over and over at all angles with no luck. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can't even tell if the tube has any openings to the downtube. It does not appear to have any openings into the seat tube. Thanks.

  36. #236
    You know my steez...
    Reputation: BunnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    anyone have any suggestions on how to get at the middle horizontal tube. I've tried everything to try and get at it. I'm trying to get a small piece of metal or something out from inside the tube and have had no luck so far. It's been down to the frame and shaken over and over and over at all angles with no luck. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can't even tell if the tube has any openings to the downtube. It does not appear to have any openings into the seat tube. Thanks.
    I hate to say it but I think you need to get a warranty replacement frame. Sounds like whatever is in the frame is in there for good....
    I'm unique, just like everyone else....

  37. #237
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    I'm 5'7" and have to cuff my 30" inseam Levi 501's to keep from stepping on the hems and fraying them out. I tend to prefer typical 26er MTB frames in 16" to 17",and 18" is definitely larger than I like.

    Since this would by my first 29er, and the smallest size is 17.5" - should I be worried? The non-trad frame design gives me pause... I do plan on singletracking on some rocky trails and don't want to bust my nads, as it were. Also would be using platform pedals and skateboard sneakers most of the time.

    Already looked at the Trek geometry specs and frame sizing chart. Not certain enough to make an online order. I do like the bike if I can get it for $1100-1200, and would be doing an Alfine 11spd buildup after about a year. Any help would be greatly appreciated, as Trek hasn't replied to my directly emailing them as of yet.

  38. #238
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by stratosrally
    I'm 5'7" and have to cuff my 30" inseam Levi 501's to keep from stepping on the hems and fraying them out. I tend to prefer typical 26er MTB frames in 16" to 17",and 18" is definitely larger than I like.

    Since this would by my first 29er, and the smallest size is 17.5" - should I be worried? The non-trad frame design gives me pause... I do plan on singletracking on some rocky trails and don't want to bust my nads, as it were. Also would be using platform pedals and skateboard sneakers most of the time.

    Already looked at the Trek geometry specs and frame sizing chart. Not certain enough to make an online order. I do like the bike if I can get it for $1100-1200, and would be doing an Alfine 11spd buildup after about a year. Any help would be greatly appreciated, as Trek hasn't replied to my directly emailing them as of yet.
    Do you not have a Trek dealer close by that you could go see how you fit on on other 29er models? Seems to me that you should really swing your leg over one before taking a shot in the dark.

    -r

  39. #239
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    227
    I have one at my shop and those bars are super comfy, I rode it down the road a couple miles and they feel great, we have a twisty short trail as well and I liked how the bars felt. gonna try and get one of these.

  40. #240
    Bro Mountainbiker
    Reputation: Sheepo5669's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,583
    Is this the bike with GFs new "Slippery Hamster" geo?
    Raised in a Chicken-Coop by Chickens

  41. #241
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheepo5669
    Is this the bike with GFs new "Slippery Hamster" geo?
    What? It's G2. Same as the rest.

  42. #242
    mountaingoatcycles.com
    Reputation: First Flight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,354
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    anyone have any suggestions on how to get at the middle horizontal tube. I've tried everything to try and get at it. I'm trying to get a small piece of metal or something out from inside the tube and have had no luck so far. It's been down to the frame and shaken over and over and over at all angles with no luck. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can't even tell if the tube has any openings to the downtube. It does not appear to have any openings into the seat tube. Thanks.
    Both bikes that we received had debris in them as well. We removed the seat post and were able to remove it that way on both bikes. We had already greased the seat tube and all the little metal bits got stuck in the grease which scored the end up the post when we tried to reinsert it. Now we know to shake the crap out of them before greasing the seat tube

  43. #243
    tl1
    tl1 is offline
    Bicyclist
    Reputation: tl1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,851

    A stroke of inspiration just hit

    Quote Originally Posted by prphoto
    And then the Inglis Retrotec Triple
    Retrotecs are beautiful bikes but what would a bike brand called Retro-Smegma look like? Probably not so nice. Any budding entrepreneurs feel free to use that name.

  44. #244
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by stratosrally
    I'm 5'7" and have to cuff my 30" inseam Levi 501's to keep from stepping on the hems and fraying them out. I tend to prefer typical 26er MTB frames in 16" to 17",and 18" is definitely larger than I like.

    Since this would by my first 29er, and the smallest size is 17.5" - should I be worried? The non-trad frame design gives me pause... I do plan on singletracking on some rocky trails and don't want to bust my nads, as it were. Also would be using platform pedals and skateboard sneakers most of the time.

    Already looked at the Trek geometry specs and frame sizing chart. Not certain enough to make an online order. I do like the bike if I can get it for $1100-1200, and would be doing an Alfine 11spd buildup after about a year. Any help would be greatly appreciated, as Trek hasn't replied to my directly emailing them as of yet.
    I'm 5'8" with a 31" inseam and bought the 17.5". This bike has a higher standover than any of my other frames. To the point where it is touching my groin while I stand over the twin top tubes. That's with flat sneakers on. The bike fits well, but one of the first comments I made was how much higher the standover was than I was used to. I think that the high standover is a result of the aesthetically designed curving top tubes. I hope that helps.

  45. #245
    TR
    TR is offline
    Angry bunny
    Reputation: TR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,894
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    anyone have any suggestions on how to get at the middle horizontal tube. I've tried everything to try and get at it. I'm trying to get a small piece of metal or something out from inside the tube and have had no luck so far. It's been down to the frame and shaken over and over and over at all angles with no luck. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can't even tell if the tube has any openings to the downtube. It does not appear to have any openings into the seat tube. Thanks.
    Air hose and pressure gun is what I have seen to remove media lodged in frames.

  46. #246
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    93
    slippery hamster...

    thats f-ing funny!

  47. #247
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by smoen81
    I'm 5'8" with a 31" inseam and bought the 17.5". This bike has a higher standover than any of my other frames. To the point where it is touching my groin while I stand over the twin top tubes. That's with flat sneakers on. The bike fits well, but one of the first comments I made was how much higher the standover was than I was used to. I think that the high standover is a result of the aesthetically designed curving top tubes. I hope that helps.
    Many thanks, the difference created by the twin curved top tubes is exactly what I was concerned with. I appreciate you mentioning that you were wearing sneakers, as I stopped using light hikers because they were too stiff in the ankle area. I'll look at other bikes with more of sloping top tube design... I do like a longer wheelbase & chainstay bike with a tallish, somewhat slack front end. And steel with a rigid fork is a must!

  48. #248
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BmoreKen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    701

    Today's Trek Sawyer

    I couldn't resist, pulled the trigger after my LBS made a deal to strip off the components group and wheels. I think she's a piece of art, and affordable one unlike a custom Hunter or a Jones Spaceframe (not to suggest that the Sawyer rides like one or that the Spaceframe is not worth, just for me I can't justify the cost).

    First impressions are that it's solid, but slow handling. I guess the technical term would be understeer, like a slow response - sorta flops over when you make a slow turn, whereas my Niner MCR with a 80 mm Reba is quick. But that's not really a complaint, just an observation - I do kinda like the way it feels, and you get used to it pretty quickly. Paint job is impressive, seems like it's will not chip or scratch too easily, though time will truly tell on that one. And I'm digging the crivitz handlebar, have to agree with tw3nty9er that that's how she should be ridden - with a crivitz or similar bar.

    I'm no expert, but to me this bike feels more like an urban cruiser than a technical trail hardtail. Not that you can't hit the trails with it, but again compared with my MCR it just doesn't feel as agile and quick for tight, twisty, rooty singletrack with logs and other fun stuff. Should suit my purpose perfectly: an all-rounder - back roads to gravel roads to paved pathways to singletrack and back again.

    May be a SS conversion in her future - hard to resist with that design.






  49. #249
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tw3nty9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    175
    BmoreKen, congrats! She just gets better with every ride too. Seriously, once you get a good feel for the way she handles and get used to her bumps it's a completely joy to ride. I've been commuting about 5 miles everyday through the snow with mine and this is easily my favorite part of the day. It just rolls so smoothly, imo. also, with regard to the handling, maybe it understeers just a tad but I grown to love it and think it makes for a very stable a secure feeling ride.

    side note: i just replaced my brooks with the stock saddle and it's actually quite nice. might be my new favorite mtn saddle.

  50. #250
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BmoreKen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    side note: i just replaced my brooks with the stock saddle and it's actually quite nice. might be my new favorite mtn saddle.
    I'm a big fan of the Bonty saddles

    And BTW, really dig the way you set your bike up, with the silver cranks and headset, etc. Looks sweet.

  51. #251
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Took advantage of a dry break between impending showers and all the melted snow that has kept most of our local SORBA maintained trails closed in Atlanta. Although by the end of the ride it was getting a little mucky with the freeze\thaw thing going on....none-the-less, it was a nice ride!

    The Sawyer is easily my favorite bike right now.....although I have a 2011 SF HT Elite and a 2010 SF 100 all hanging side-by-side in the garage, the Sawyer is the only mtb I've ridden in the last month. The more I ride it, the more comfortable I get with the whole rigid fork thing. I even have a Fox RLC fork sitting there ready to go!

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-photo-6-.jpg  


  52. #252
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tw3nty9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by BmoreKen
    I'm a big fan of the Bonty saddles

    And BTW, really dig the way you set your bike up, with the silver cranks and headset, etc. Looks sweet.
    Thanks! I'm thinking about buying a red chainring from homebrew and possibly a red salsa flip off skewer from salsa. a little color wouldn't hurt.

  53. #253
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tw3nty9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    175
    @oclvframe - them tires look huge! what are you running with?

  54. #254
    You know my steez...
    Reputation: BunnV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    a little color wouldn't hurt.
    I think it's a beautiful frame and would love to see one painted in bright colors like a Retrotec or original Schwinn "Krate" bike.
    I'm unique, just like everyone else....

  55. #255
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    @oclvframe - them tires look huge! what are you running with?
    I put on a matched set of 29-3 2.25s Team Issues....(not the wire-bead crap that came on the bike)....running tubeless with 18psi in back and 15psi up front.

    I really like those tires...had them on the Rumblefish I bought to take to Moab and really liked them there...figured it would be a good tire for the Sawyer.

    -r

  56. #256
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Squatcho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    150
    Someone has a 17.5" frame set up for sale on ebay:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tchlink:top:en

    Strange description though - who buys a Sawyer for it's mediocre build kit and sells the frame?

  57. #257
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989
    Someone who may have realized the cool factor isn't worth the 10lb frameset. I would have already bought one if it weren't so heavy.

    or

    Someone who works at a Trek dealer bought one and is now selling the frame. If you buy it at cost and sell the frame for 525, you got a pretty nice component package for pretty cheap.

  58. #258
    transmitter~receiver
    Reputation: meltingfeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,182
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    Someone who may have realized the cool factor isn't worth the 10lb frameset. I would have already bought one if it weren't so heavy.
    is it really 10lbs?
    Quote Originally Posted by pvd
    Time to stop believing the hype and start doing some science.
    29er Tire Weight Database

  59. #259
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by meltingfeather
    is it really 10lbs?
    Just under 8lbs for the frame and almost 3lbs for the fork. If the frameset were in the 5lb range, then sure, but at 8lbs for the frame? Just over 30lbs stock. I saw one with XT and a Fox and it's still around 30lbs. IMO too heavy for a bike that costs that much, even if it looks awesome.

    I would ride it with a suspension fork for sure. Rigid isn't my cup of tea.

  60. #260
    transmitter~receiver
    Reputation: meltingfeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,182
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    IMO too heavy for a bike that costs that much, even if it looks awesome.
    can't say i disagree.
    Quote Originally Posted by pvd
    Time to stop believing the hype and start doing some science.
    29er Tire Weight Database

  61. #261
    Florida Trail Monkey
    Reputation: Beckman4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    295

    Sawyer belt drive

    Quote Originally Posted by tw3nty9er
    Seriously considering one, however, I wish I could learn more about it before I throw down a deposit on one. Has anyone heard any gossip about this bike? What assumptions can you extrapolate from the info that's already out there (see trek's website)?

    It look's heavy but maybe all the extra tubes are throwing my off. Will it be vertically compliant and laterally stiff? for some reason it looks like it would be a little noodlish to me but I just don't have a ton of experience (only been in the game for 1.5 yrs).
    I finally got my Sawyer fitted up with a Gates Carbon Drive system and it dropped about 3 full pounds, along with a Moots post, Bonty "Crowbar" lo riser and Maxxis Crossmark tires front and back. Gearing is 39X22 which we (Gavin at Gates and I) decided was closest to my normal 32X18.

    It's not light and it was expensive to just get it down to ~26 pound range. But it is a great ride that is in no way noodley. The Ti post helps with vert compliance. The straighter bar helped me get the steering quicker, so now the handling to me is just like the other G2 bikes. I've gotten lots of comments on the trails, on the road and in parking lots with the bike on the roof rack.

    Sorry for the not-so-great iPhone pictures.
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  62. #262
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Schultz29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    845
    That's a beautiful looking frame. Saw one at my LBS a couple weeks ago. It came as a frame and fork and was a size medium. To satisfy my own curiosity, I asked if we could weigh it. Keep in mind, that the frame still had some packing foam attached. At any rate, I placed frame and fork on the scale and it weighed-in at 10 lbs. 14 oz. including the aforementioned packing foam. However, I can't image that packing material weighed more than a couple ounces? Still want one but shedding weight will be expensive.

    Please post more pics of your belt-drive bike. That's what I have in mind as well. It sounds like you've got a sweet build but hard to tell in the lower res photos.

  63. #263
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    944
    Fyi' Sawyers in stock at distributers

  64. #264
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    Saw one myself in a shop in Austin a couple days ago - but I'm happy with my just-purchased Haro Beasley 1x9 650b. The 16" frame size (found used, no less!) suits my short inseam way better than the smallest Sawyer ever would. Not as pretty a frame, though!

  65. #265
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    16
    I recently bought a Sawyer frame/fork on fleabay. I was planning on building it up as a gates belt drive SS. But the largest chainring that will fit is a gates 39t (due to chainring/chainstay clearance), and coupled with their (smallest) 20t rear cog, would put me at 15.1 mph at 90rpm. I think that is a little too spinny.
    My other belt option is to go internal gear hub.
    What to do, what to do? Rohloff? So much coin... Any advice welcome.

  66. #266
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddy Shagmore
    I recently bought a Sawyer frame/fork on fleabay. I was planning on building it up as a gates belt drive SS. But the largest chainring that will fit is a gates 39t (due to chainring/chainstay clearance), and coupled with their (smallest) 20t rear cog, would put me at 15.1 mph at 90rpm. I think that is a little too spinny.
    My other belt option is to go internal gear hub.
    What to do, what to do? Rohloff? So much coin... Any advice welcome.


    I was considering an Alfine 8 speed hub . Check out the Internal gear hub sub forum:

    http://forums.mtbr.com/internal-gear-hubs/

  67. #267
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Schultz29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    845
    Shimano was supposed to have a new and improved Alfine rear hub with 11 speeds for 2011. As I recall it was 100 grams lighter as well?

  68. #268
    Pure Evil
    Reputation: [TA]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    64
    I've posted this before, but I'm pretty stoked on this thing so... Here's my Sawyer built up as a winter fixed gear training bike. So far it has been awesome.

    Yes, thats a bit of surface rust. This is a pre production frame with a ghetto rattle can paint job, I'll be repainting in the spring.

    34x15 gearing
    Crivitz Bar
    PDW Panda Treat Grips
    Juicy Ultimate Front Brake
    Stylo OCT Cranks
    Paul Hubs
    SKS Full Coverage Fenders
    Bontrager XR1 1.9" Tires
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-sawyer.jpg  

    Trek Sawyer-sawyer-2.jpg  

    Trek Sawyer-sawyer-3.jpg  

    Trek Sawyer-sawyer-4.jpg  

    |Trek Bicycle Corporation|

    Stalk me on Instagram

  69. #269
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Schultz29
    Shimano was supposed to have a new and improved Alfine rear hub with 11 speeds for 2011. As I recall it was 100 grams lighter as well?
    http://sheldonbrown.com/harris/shimano-nexus.html

    Not quite 100g lighter, but a definite improvement on the Alfine 8. NOT cheap, though...

    Lots of info at that link about Shimano IG hubs, and IG hubs in general.

  70. #270
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2
    for me it was about the cool shop factor,mine is going to be seeing most of its time being ridden with the kids and slower group rides
    mods so far are a real world
    low rise bointrager bar
    thompson seatpost
    cheap platform pedals
    of course gates belt drive 39X22 with 113 belt
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-dsc_0025a.jpg  


  71. #271
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9
    I love the new Sawyer. Has anybody seen the Trek Broadsider, concept?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-trek-broadsider.jpg  

    Last edited by dzdimaquibo; 04-05-2011 at 11:22 PM.

  72. #272
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    Quote Originally Posted by dzdimaquibo
    I love my new Sawyer. Has anybody seen the Trek Broadsider, concept?

    Does it look like a red X?

  73. #273
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by AZ.MTNS
    Does it look like a red X?
    oops...hopefully not anymore!
    Last edited by dzdimaquibo; 03-08-2011 at 04:35 PM.

  74. #274
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jmmUT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Here's mine. Unfortunately I only got one ride out of it until snow returned but spring is upon us!

    The only OG are F/F, brakes, cranks.
    Different parts of note are: supa-wide Chromag Fubar DH bars, Bontrager race SS wheelset, Ignitor 2.1, BBG bashguard. Sits at about 28 lbs.

    I recommend slamming the wheel as far forward as possible which helped me lift my front when needed and feel more agile.

    Biggest downsides I've seen are: the stock fork can make putting wide fenders on it tricky- I had to use vice grips to squeeze a fender through.

    I really wish it had internal cable routing-it needs that for the clean cruiser/klunker look.

    All in all I love it



  75. #275
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 5power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by [TA]
    I've posted this before, but I'm pretty stoked on this thing so... Here's my Sawyer built up as a winter fixed gear training bike. So far it has been awesome.

    Yes, thats a bit of surface rust. This is a pre production frame with a ghetto rattle can paint job, I'll be repainting in the spring.

    34x15 gearing
    Crivitz Bar
    PDW Panda Treat Grips
    Juicy Ultimate Front Brake
    Stylo OCT Cranks
    Paul Hubs
    SKS Full Coverage Fenders
    Bontrager XR1 1.9" Tires

    Those fenders are sweet..... I'm getting set Thanks

  76. #276
    Tigard, Oregon
    Reputation: clayman29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    153
    I saw a Sawyer today at my lbs and had a chance to sit on it but not ride it yet. I'd be really interested in hearing input on these now that it's been out for awhile. I've been hoping to get a Pugsley but for financial reasons I might go this route instead...

    Any input would be appreciated! Thanks!

  77. #277
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by clayman29
    I saw a Sawyer today at my lbs and had a chance to sit on it but not ride it yet. I'd be really interested in hearing input on these now that it's been out for awhile. I've been hoping to get a Pugsley but for financial reasons I might go this route instead...

    Any input would be appreciated! Thanks!
    I love my Sawyer...so far I have taken it on anything from my weekly training rides after work to long weekend group rides and every time I ride it I have a huge smile on my face...it is so much fun to ride!! No it is not light but dang it is fun!!!

    -r

  78. #278
    Tigard, Oregon
    Reputation: clayman29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by oclvframe
    I love my Sawyer...so far I have taken it on anything from my weekly training rides after work to long weekend group rides and every time I ride it I have a huge smile on my face...it is so much fun to ride!! No it is not light but dang it is fun!!!

    -r
    Have you ever ridden the Surly Karate Monkey? It's actually less but the Trek feels like something I could ride for a long time and upgrade if the need arises...

    Now if I can only find a deal besides straight retail in Oregon or Washington!
    Last edited by clayman29; 04-26-2011 at 08:38 PM.

  79. #279
    Tigard, Oregon
    Reputation: clayman29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by dzdimaquibo
    I love the new Sawyer. Has anybody seen the Trek Broadsider, concept?
    I love that thing! It looks like an old Speedway bike from the sixties! Will it come with a steel shoe?

  80. #280
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9
    The Sawyer has been a fun bike to ride around on. Definitely holding onto her...and getting ready to throw down more money to upgrade her.
    I wish I had a machine to stab people in the eyes across the internet. Stabby stabby.

  81. #281
    Tigard, Oregon
    Reputation: clayman29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    153
    Does anyone know the largest tires that can be run on the Sawyer?

  82. #282
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    28
    Nice write up in new issue of Mountain bike magazine about the Sawyer.

  83. #283
    Tigard, Oregon
    Reputation: clayman29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by ATBScott
    Threw a set of the 29-4 tires on the Sawyer we have on the floor (yeah Pimp - it's a 17.5") and the tires looked uber-fat on the Duster rims - and there was pretty good clearance as well - Now - just have to get a good SS hub quickly to get that rim built up on a wide-flange-spacing hub. The bars feel pretty good - but may have to throw a pair of Titec J-bars on since I don't think I'll be riding with gears...
    Did the 29-4's fit on the front and back?

  84. #284
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    Quote Originally Posted by clayman29
    Did the 29-4's fit on the front and back?
    I haven't used 29-4's on the Sawyer, but I did test fit some FR-3's on 28mm wide rims into the frame. It clears the stays with about 2-3mm to spare all around. Probably okay with dry conditions. I still have some mud to deal with around here, so I took the FR-3's off for now.

    FR-3's are just as wide as 29-4's, maybe wider at the knobs, so the comparison should give you an idea how 29-4's work. I also have 29-4's on another bike, so if I get time I'll test fit those as well.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  85. #285
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7

    Sawyer with Rohloff, Gates Carbon and Surly Fat Front

    I just got my new Trek Sawyer from my LBS (Union Cycle in Attleboro MA). It is freaking awesome. The handlebars, crankset, brakes and frame are the only stock parts.

    Rohloff 14 speed internal rear hub on a Velocity P35 rim and a 2.4in Maxxis Ardent tire.
    Phil Wood hub on a Surly Large Marge front wheel running a Surly Endomorph 3.7 inch tire.
    DT Swiss ratcheting skewers front and rear
    Surly Pugsley front fork
    X Fusion Hilo drop post with Brooks saddle
    Stock cranks with Gates belt drive
    King Ti cages


    Ron at Union Cycle did an amazingly clean job running the cables for the Rohloff. It rides great, the big front tire really absorbs the bumps the the Rohloff is really smooth shifting. Not light...37 pounds fully loaded, but I am a 300 pound guy so grams aren't really my default unit of measurement for bicycles.

    Left side with detail of Rohloff cabling:



    Right side:


    Rohloff detail:


    Fat Front detail:


    Gates detail:
    Last edited by STAC; 05-14-2011 at 05:01 PM.

  86. #286
    wheelmanron
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    59
    Thanks for the public compliments Steve! If only there were more patient, appreciative customers like you in the industry.

  87. #287
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7
    No problem Ron, I believe in supporting my LBS and I am fortunate to have Union Cycle fill that role for me. Anyone on this forum, if you want a Rohloff/Gates combo, the guys at Union Cycle in Attleboro MA can hook you up, they have done it and it works great. If you want a set of custom wheels, Ron is one of the best wheel builders I have ever known. And he custom roasts coffee in his spare time too.

  88. #288
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    22
    OK, newbie here that needs some help on this. Are bikes like cars where they are going to have a new line-up for next year? Any idea if for next year this bike will be offerred next year with some minor changes or paint changes? When will those be released, or do I need to take out a loan to get my hands on one now.

  89. #289
    WNC Native
    Reputation: nitrousjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,294
    Quote Originally Posted by tundra277 View Post
    OK, newbie here that needs some help on this. Are bikes like cars where they are going to have a new line-up for next year? Any idea if for next year this bike will be offerred next year with some minor changes or paint changes? When will those be released, or do I need to take out a loan to get my hands on one now.
    Yeah most of the major manufacturers have a new line each year. The Sawyer will be out again next year and probably very little if any changes (maybe build components or color). I know a lot of people are asking for a frameset only option too. The 2012 Trek lineup will probably be released in the fall (August/Sep time frame).
    "I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew

  90. #290
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    Wish they'd add a smaller frame size, or downsize the whole thing around a 650B wheel build.

    The 17.5" is just a bit too big for me.
    '10 Haro Beasley 650b 1x9
    '90 Specialized Rockhopper Comp

  91. #291
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    22
    Thanks for the response.

    You little guys have lots to choose from. I am 6'9' and 225 so I have been eyballing the 29'ers for awhile and I am glad to see a production "cruiser" that finally catches my eye that isn't the $$$$ of a Sheep, McClung, Retrotec etc....

    Hopefully I will be sporting one of these soon.

  92. #292
    sketchiness abounds...
    Reputation: stratosrally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    89
    While I wouldn't want to take any choices from ya, big guy - I too would like a retro-style cruiser with somewhat modern geometry for a good price!

    Jeez, 6 foot 9 inches - what frame sizes do you normally ride?

    I recently switched from a 18" frame to a 16" and am much more comfortable offroad - I'm 5' 7".

    I straddled a 17.5" Sawyer and was seriously bustin' my nads.

    It's that split arcing top tube combined with my 29" inseam!
    '10 Haro Beasley 650b 1x9
    '90 Specialized Rockhopper Comp

  93. #293
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    464
    So I've had my Sawyer a few weeks now. I've done a lot of commuting to work on it on greenways and paved roads, as well as quite a bit of riding on fire roads. And today I finally took it on some rolling singletrack (Lake Crabtree for any Raleigh riders).

    As a commuter, it works great but is a little under-geared. I'm debating whether to ditch the bash guard and add a 42 or 44T ring. But I may just keep it like it is and go slower and try to "smell the roses" a little bit more. This bike isn't really about going fast anyway.

    It's an absolute blast on fire roads/carriage trails. That 2.3" wide front tire floats over loose, dry sand really well.

    This is my first 29er and I'm loving how it rolls over everything. But the lack of front suspension eventually starts to wear on this 41 year old while riding singletrack. After 1.5 hours of riding over roots I was looking forward to the beginner trails and the ride back home through Umstead Park.

    It's not the lightest, nimblest, or cheapest ride out there but it's fun and it rides great and I give the bike a hearty 2 thumbs up! I'll post pictures when I get my post count up.

  94. #294
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,800


    On it's first really long ride. Urban exploration. Mostly paved trails, some dirt, some curb hopping. It's mostly stock, I replaced the seatpost / saddle / stem / grips / pedals and added my lights.

    It's a really comfortable bike. They got the cockpit right, that's for sure - I was nicely front/rear balanced with just a little bit of setback on the saddle. It's long and stable. Carves. Less 'flickable' than my Haro Mary, but springier. I think the curved tubes are doing some work to soak up bumps.

    I can't really see needing to mod it further, which is a good thing. I'll wear out these tires first and see if I need to stay knobby or maybe go for urban slicks.

  95. #295
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    5
    I haven't weighed it for a while, but I think it's ~26.5 pounds.
    Nothing special, but I like it. The front tire is getting switched to a Racing Ralph 2.4 in the next week or so.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-sawyer2.jpg  


  96. #296
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    189

    Fox is on....but just for a bit...

    So, ever since I tore down my 09 SF HT, I kept the fork specifically to use on my Sawyer. I had a CK crown race already on it, so all I had to do was drop the rigid fork and slap the fox in.

    The ride was just as I expected...super smooth....I had to re-learn how to ride the bike without that rigid front end...but other than that, it was a really nice ride. All that being said, I will leave Fox on and roll around on it just for giggles for a little while, but I think in the long run, I will put the rigid fork back on and leave it as my fully rigid bike.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-sawyer.jpg  


  97. #297
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    52
    I just took my girl out for her first ride on my weekday trail.

    What a great bike. I went in with the knowledge that she is a little heavy and that she is no race bike. I couldn't be more pleased. She rides very smooth and turned a trail that I have ridden a ton into a "new" adventure.

    The rigid fork will force me to become a better rider and only knocked me off the line I usually take with my Rig twice. I'm a big fan of G2 but it's not for everyone.

    I will be switching out the wheels this weekend and dropping the gears too. I'm thinking about a 22t cog over my usual 20t cog I use on the Rig.

    I feel that this is an awesome bike as long as you know what it is before you take the next step.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-photo.jpg  


  98. #298
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Chronism's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    272
    I'm really diggin' this bike the more pictures I see of it.

  99. #299
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9
    I've just finished to built mine with carbon belt drive with the help of one forumer of this post, thank you, I let you for riding, I will tell you later my feelings.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Trek Sawyer-img_4134.jpg  


  100. #300
    Only dead people are old
    Reputation: Super E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    623
    Hmmm...this is one fun ride! Been on it since December and can't say enough about how well it performs for a rigid bike.
    <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/iWcUB8lsaSz_R4Xi0JPvQQ?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-GzqG1NBBdBY/TYqrIkcgbYI/AAAAAAAAEhg/c6mKEhrExZ8/s640/IMG_2999.jpg" height="480" width="640" /></a>

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast