Results 1 to 83 of 83
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777

    New question here. Trek full suspension 29ers- when available? no 96ers&650Bers

    Hello
    I am curious why trek has not yet introduced 29ers. They have technology from Fisher and even relabelling GF to Trek would increase sales and draw more attention to 29ers. What do you think?
    Last edited by Davidcopperfield; 11-28-2007 at 07:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Schipperkes are cool.
    Reputation: banks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,120
    It's Trek...................
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee
    Better suited to non-aggressive 125# gals named Russell.
    I ride so slow, your Garmin will shut off.

  3. #3
    i also unicycle
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,044
    they already have 29ers, they've just got fisher stickers on them. same people. i doubt they care.
    mtbr says you should know: i work in a bike shop.
    bikes & beers (on my blog) http://idontrideenough.blogspot.com/

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    18
    I think they got it covered well, selling their GF line as 29ers and keeping the Trek name with the 69er, know this year the new Fuel 69er, and hardtail 69er in addition to last years 69er SS. I think this new Fuel is gonna be a pretty good setup for lots of folks for racing. Next year i bet they offer their new rear axel pivot design in a 69er.

  5. #5
    just ride
    Reputation: chequamagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,924
    I doubt that putting the trek name on them would increase sales.

    Fisher relies heavily on the fact that they were the first big name in the 29er game, and the freaky dude they got their namesake from is somehow mixed up with all those that claim to have invented the concept.

    As many have expressed on this board, there are people who give Fisher the business because they were the first to dive off the deep end. There is something to be said about that, and I think Trek sees that the money is in keeping that Fisher name synonymous with 29ers.
    Steel is Real: www.advocatecycles.com
    Tires for real rides: www.terrenetires.com

  6. #6
    Captain Underpants
    Reputation: Random Drivel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,281
    I think . . . . . KA-BLAM!



    That was the sound of my head exploding.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Quote Originally Posted by chequamagon
    There is something to be said about that, and I think Trek sees that the money is in keeping that Fisher name synonymous with 29ers.
    You missed the point. As GF and trek manufacture 26ers separately, then why only GF produces 29ers? Why not implement Trek's 29er version of their 26ers?- that is what I am wondering about. The more the better. If not why not label all trek bikes with GF sticker?

    For instance GF introduced Hi-Fi 29ers and Trek can introduce Top Fuel & Fuel EX 29ers. Trek could invest into geeting some Fox talas 36mm manufactured and it would not diminish a GF role in any way.

  8. #8
    just ride
    Reputation: chequamagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,924
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    You missed the point. As GF and trek manufacture 26ers separately, then why only GF produces 29ers? Why not implement Trek's 29er version of their 26ers?- that is what I am wondering about. The more the better. If not why not label all trek bikes with GF sticker?

    For instance GF introduced Hi-Fi 29ers and Trek can introduce Top Fuel & Fuel EX 29ers. Trek could invest into geeting some Fox talas 36mm manufactured and it would not diminish a GF role in any way.
    You missed the point. Its not about cool bikes. Its about money. All large bike corporations are this way, Big T, Big S, Big G. Not to mention, Trek and Fisher do not manufacture seperately. Its all the same crap, and the stickers are applied to particular models to align with marketing schemes. All industries are this way, it is called perceived value marketing.

    Oh, and you missed the other point. You are a freak show and your ideas are about as grounded in reality as a Mars spacewalk.
    Steel is Real: www.advocatecycles.com
    Tires for real rides: www.terrenetires.com

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Hello
    I am curious why trek has not yet introduced 29ers. They have technology from Fisher and even relabelling GF to Trek would increase sales and draw more attention to 29ers. What do you think?
    Trek and Fisher are part of the same big American bike company. A lot of dealers carry both brands, and it would increase inventory a bunch to double up so to speak. Also, Fisher does fine with mtbs in general, but 29ers in particular, so Trek tends to leave that market to them, while pretty much keeping the high end road bike market for themselves (and Le Mond, I guess).

    I guess the short answer is BRAND IDENTITY.

    Whatever the case, I have my fingers crossed that the new Fuel rear sus finds its way onto a Fisher 29er next year. That is one sweet setup!
    Whining is not a strategy.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Don Wardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by chequamagon
    Oh, and you missed the other point. You are a freak show and your ideas are about as grounded in reality as a Mars spacewalk.
    I laughed out loud at the computer... AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777

    New question here.

    Quote Originally Posted by kosmo
    Also, Fisher does fine with mtbs in general, but 29ers in particular, so Trek tends to leave that market to them, while pretty much keeping the high end road bike market for themselves (and Le Mond, I guess).

    I guess the short answer is BRAND IDENTITY.
    I did not deny that way of conception, yet trek manufacture mtb 26ers and I ask why 26ers only and not 29ers? If they introduced 69er/96er then why not 99/29ers?
    If it is the same company and it is banal.

  12. #12
    Self-defeatist
    Reputation: CLONG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    I did not deny that way of conception,
    Hee hee, It's good to be open to new things. *snicker*

    Trek will not produce 29ERS unless it is economically feasible. If you really understand that point, don't look at it with the "More choice is better," outlook. No large bike company can afford that outlook.

    Instead, why don't you suggest that GF go all 29ers and trek all 26ers. Might happen.
    I'm covered in beer.

  13. #13
    No longer 26
    Reputation: G-Live's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,087
    Quote Originally Posted by CLONG
    :

    Instead, why don't you suggest that GF go all 29ers and trek all 26ers. Might happen.
    My DC style somewhat related question is not so much when will GF go all 29 but when will they stop offering 2 models of the same bike in all sizes. Why not go all out with only 29s on at least the largest 2 sizes, both wheel sizes for the middle size and 26 for the smallest 2 sizes. Or even 29 for biggest 3 and 26 for smallest. ie Superfly XS and SM in 26, Med in 26 and 29, Lg and XL in 29.

    I know, I know, small riders can benefit from a 29er as well but it may or may not make sizing sense to the typical consumer. I think it would be easier to sell the concept of bigger wheels on the bigger bike size etc. Especially since GF hisself is a taller rider.

    G (secret admirer of DC's posts cause they can lead to something fun)
    You can't depend on honest answers from dependant hands...

  14. #14
    I just passed you
    Reputation: ferrousness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    181

    Cheq. is the man!

    I want whatever bike Cheq. is riding because he's smarter than me for sure and seems to have his finger on the pulse of the entire cycling industry. Been to the "evil black tower of death" for a factory visit recently? It's amazing that so much under-engineered, poorly executed and manufactured product can come out of small town Wisconsin.

    Chrismas time is the season of love, remember?!

    ...Oh yeah, from my Trek contact, Fisher is it for 29ers/Trek for 69ers with no plans to change.
    Ride a decent line, won't ya!

  15. #15
    willtsmith_nwi
    Reputation: willtsmith_nwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by G-Live
    My DC style somewhat related question is not so much when will GF go all 29 but when will they stop offering 2 models of the same bike in all sizes. Why not go all out with only 29s on at least the largest 2 sizes, both wheel sizes for the middle size and 26 for the smallest 2 sizes. Or even 29 for biggest 3 and 26 for smallest. ie Superfly XS and SM in 26, Med in 26 and 29, Lg and XL in 29.
    Trek does short top tubes. Fisher and Lemond does the longer top tubes. Long top tubes are a natural fit for 29ers and Fisher started with em' so why change it.

    I think Trek has a good marketing plan. They'll push 69ers to those who fall into the gearing trap and Fisher will keep selling full 29ers.

    Now, here is the other issue. The 29er hardtail is effectively filling the old market segment for the race hardtail. It's filling a pricepoint niche and the bike companies don't seem eager to sell $400 29ers stocked with junk components even though they can. Fisher needs a whole bike lineup, not just high end stuff. So I would expect to see the 26ers stay in the lineup until some enterprising company starts making $500 geared 29er hardtails and forces everyone else to do so.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    26
    It's filling a pricepoint niche and the bike companies don't seem eager to sell $400 29ers stocked with junk components even though they can. Fisher needs a whole bike lineup, not just high end stuff. So I would expect to see the 26ers stay in the lineup until some enterprising company starts making $500 geared 29er hardtails and forces everyone else to do so.[/QUOTE]

    I've spoken with the Fisher product manager about cheaper 29er bikes. They will not be doing them in the near future. At this point in time the lesser expensive 29er forks and wheel sets are so heavy that they don't feel that people would have much fun riding them. They would actually have more fun with riding the inferior wheel size because the weight would be so much lighter.
    "Nothing unreal exists".

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Will Trek lag so much behind? Why don't they just add a bigger rear wheel to the Fuel 69er? An option of 99er won't blight sales.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: serious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,201
    Maybe somebody at Trek got over enthusiastic (we have seen it here one or twice ) and decided that a 29er wheel is like 2 inches of suspension.
    My rides:
    Lynskey Ti Pro29 SL singlespeed
    KHS Team 29
    S-Works Roubaix SL3 Dura Ace
    KHS CX 550 cyclocross

  19. #19
    willtsmith_nwi
    Reputation: willtsmith_nwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,997
    Holy Zombie Thread Batman!!!!

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,027
    The real question, is when are we going to see ABP suspension on GF 29ers?

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliver
    The real question, is when are we going to see ABP suspension on GF 29ers?
    That's what we argue really about not a "Trek" label. If GF did trek's top fuel and call whatever he wants, it is fine with me. I'm good.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    So is Trek even considering joining 29er market? Not 69ers or under GF label but their own Top Fuel 29er?

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    A reply I've gotten.
    Our 2010 models will be debuting
    sometime in mid to late August. We have not heard of plans for a 29er
    on the Trek end, but stranger things have happened.


    a real Fuel Ex 29er, no sh!t!

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Okay gals and guys who wants a carbon Fuex Ex 29er with new 2011 Fox 120mm talas 15mm on board?

    That would be a bad ass !

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    598
    I assure you there are prototype Trek 29ers out there. I have a pro friend who will remain nameless that has seen them. Unfortunately, he is a roadie and can't remember if it's a hardtail or fuel.

  26. #26
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    I also believe Trek will be forced by dealer/market pressure at some point to offer a 29"er. It's just a matter of time.

    It's gotta be tough for their women riders on the mtb team to watch Irminger and Koerber ride off the front on big wheels too.

    I'm also hearing more and more that the demo trucks are sending out more 29"ers and less 26"ers these days.

    Too many signs to ignore.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted
    I also believe Trek will be forced by dealer/market pressure at some point to offer a 29"er. It's just a matter of time.

    It's gotta be tough for their women riders on the mtb team to watch Irminger and Koerber ride off the front on big wheels too.

    I'm also hearing more and more that the demo trucks are sending out more 29"ers and less 26"ers these days.

    Too many signs to ignore.
    What he said

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted
    I also believe Trek will be forced by dealer/market pressure at some point to offer a 29"er. It's just a matter of time.

    It's gotta be tough for their women riders on the mtb team to watch Irminger and Koerber ride off the front on big wheels too.

    I'm also hearing more and more that the demo trucks are sending out more 29"ers and less 26"ers these days.

    Too many signs to ignore.

    I heard a little rumor today that there will be some WSD 29er bikes in the line up for 2011.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    293
    Has anybody else seen the pics of Travis Brown on a prototype 29er? He rode it at the Gunnison Growler.
    The secret to mountain biking is pretty simple. The slower you go the more likely it is you'll crash.

  30. #30
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,613
    Quote Originally Posted by prphoto
    Has anybody else seen the pics of Travis Brown on a prototype 29er? He rode it at the Gunnison Growler.
    Yes, the only "new" looking thing on it that stood out was a tapered head tube to take advantage of the new forks.

  31. #31
    Recovering couch patato
    Reputation: Cloxxki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    14,019
    Must indeed suck for Trek racers to be the last ones to get 29"ers, with so much successes and knowledge on it within the same company.

    IMO not offering 29"ers is like saying no to money. If Big S and big G are not too big to offer29"er, Big T should not think they are. Supposedly they are in the business of making money, but they seem to be jumping the shark and missing the boat with it.
    Klok - XC - Skate - Ski

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    26

    Trek 29ers

    I was told today by a Trek source that Trek will have 29ers in 2011 line up. It sounded like hard tails only and maybe a carbon one at that. It didn't sound like it would be an OCLV built frame though. Trek/GF will offer 29ers beginning around the $500 price point in 2011.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BlueMountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    891
    DC, you cannot afford a new bike so Trek asked me to ask you to eff off and they don't want to hear about your asinine 36-hole-hub-for everyone wheel ideas either. They also asked that you not email them like a freakin' psycho.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    133
    I was told yesterday that the Superfly HT would most likely remain manufactured over seas. No OCLV!

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Why hardtails when GF has a lot of FS models? Why not OCLV Fuel Ex. ABP and Full Floater combined...... yammy. Light stiff.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    293
    The only thing that I have heard is the Superfly will be OCLV. No trek 29ers in 2011
    The secret to mountain biking is pretty simple. The slower you go the more likely it is you'll crash.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    985
    Trek rep I talked to said no Trek 29ers ever. Evo link on the SF100 would be nice.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    26

    Trek 29ers

    JC,

    Your source is my source . Sorry about the cell battery tonight.

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    133
    Quote Originally Posted by Sabertooth37
    JC,

    Your source is my source . Sorry about the cell battery tonight.

    No Problem! Good reliable information!

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    Trek rep I talked to said no Trek 29ers ever. Evo link on the SF100 would be nice.
    Never say never or in this case, ever.

    The annual dealer meeting is fast approaching in early August and we'll know for sure then.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by Sabertooth37
    Never say never or in this case, ever.

    The annual dealer meeting is fast approaching in early August and we'll know for sure then.
    Yep. I think this years Trek Show will be quite nice. A Trek 29er would be a welcome product IMO as it would offer a Trek warranty on a non-G2 geometry bike. 26" hardtails are dead.

  42. #42
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    Yep. I think this years Trek Show will be quite nice. A Trek 29er would be a welcome product IMO as it would offer a Trek warranty on a non-G2 geometry bike. 26" hardtails are dead.
    If Trek does do 29"ers, I would almost be willing to bet they would be G2 geometry. trek has always co-opted into GF's geometry with the 26"er line, and then with the 69ers they went with G2 offsets and head angles as well.

    Maybe they won't, but I would be surprised if theat wasn't the case.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Asmodeus2112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    576
    What I want to know is when the hell will Toyota have a xB?

    Just STFU and buy a HiFi 29 with ABP and slap a trek sticker on it, same thang.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777

    New question here. Trek is clueless

    Thou could alternatively produce a trek fuexl ex 120mm and slap a 29" wheels in there and put a GF sticker. There is another way - redesing GF superfly 100 into Superfly 120mm with Trek suspension Full Floater and ABP, the latter is a result of leaking- so why not a homegenious model? Such Superfly 120mm would look exactly like its Trek counterpart but for the wheels, G2 and stickers&colours whatever. If such kind of Superfly exists, I'm done. I don't bother for Trek's 'fosterhood' but for their suspension nad technology.

    The question is "Why shouldn't GF use their all technology including suspension- Acquis communautaire?"
    There are Reba and Marz 44 just to be made frames for. Why no innovation?

    Ps. They might even call such fuel ex 29er Le Mond in order to be accused of doping

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Asmodeus2112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    576
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Thou could alternatively purchase a trek fuexl ex 120mm and slap a 29" wheels in there and put a GF sticker. There is another way - redesing GF superfly 100 into Superfly 120mm with Trek suspension Full Floater and ABP, the latter is a result of leaking- so why not a homegenious model? Such Superfly 120mm would look exactly like its Trek counterpart but for the wheels, G2 and stickers&colours whatever. If such kind of Superfly exists, I'm done. I don't bother for Trek's 'fosterhood' but for their suspension nad technology.

    The question is "Why shouldn't GF use their all technology including suspension- Acquis communautaire?"
    There are Reba and Marz 44 just to be made frames for. Why no innovation?

    Ps. They might even call such fuel ex 29er Le Mond in order to be accused of doping
    You might be able to put 40" wheels on you impala, but you aint putting 29" wheels on a Fuel EX...

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    985
    Little bird told me Trek flew in Gary Fisher for a huge announcement tomorrow. OCLV Superfly? Shipping in July? Only my personal speculation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted
    If Trek does do 29"ers, I would almost be willing to bet they would be G2 geometry. trek has always co-opted into GF's geometry with the 26"er line, and then with the 69ers they went with G2 offsets and head angles as well.

    Maybe they won't, but I would be surprised if theat wasn't the case.
    Last time I checked only the 9 series carbon 26" bikes shared anything close to G2 geometry and they don't have G2 offset forks on them. Everything else 8500 down has traditional geometry.

    Fuel EX and 26" Hifi IIRC were close but they don't make a 26" Hifi anymore so that's a null point.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    The problem is one for certain dealers. Not all of them can sell Fishers. I think Trek has to accomdate somehow.

  48. #48
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,258
    I don't think G2 has been around long enough for Trek to completely assimilate it, but they certainly did with G1 geometry over a period of years. And why wouldn't they? (You can use the same logic there as with the 29"er ruse, or ABP, etc)

    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    Little bird told me Trek flew in Gary Fisher for a huge announcement tomorrow. OCLV Superfly? Shipping in July? Only my personal speculation.

    Last time I checked only the 9 series carbon 26" bikes shared anything close to G2 geometry and they don't have G2 offset forks on them. Everything else 8500 down has traditional geometry.

    Fuel EX and 26" Hifi IIRC were close but they don't make a 26" Hifi anymore so that's a null point.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096

  50. #50
    No longer 26
    Reputation: G-Live's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,087
    whoa....what the ?...

    edit: No more GF branded bikes? Gary Fisher collection from Trek? Anyone see this coming?
    You can't depend on honest answers from dependant hands...

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Makes perfect sense business-wise. Looks like more models too? Roscoe is gone?

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jkirkpatri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,548
    Did not see that coming!

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    459

    Trek

    Wow, all the bikes say Trek on them. No more Gary Fisher.

    Are these bikes going to break left and right. Was thinking of getting one but with the reduction in the warranty not so sure I want to.

    I kind of admin GF. Never really liked his bikes much but the guy never gave up. He hit it with the 29er deal. I think others were doing it but he just did not let go. Congrats man, you made it. Enjoy the ride.
    Here's to sweat in your eye.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    398
    NOW Trek has a decent 29ers...

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Does that mean that Fuel Ex will be a 29er with Full Floater and ABP ?

  56. #56
    poser Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,036
    Quote Originally Posted by G-Live
    whoa....what the ?...

    edit: No more GF branded bikes? Gary Fisher collection from Trek? Anyone see this coming?

    Evidently DC saw it coming, resurrecting this thread 2 days before the official de-fisherification of Trek. Who'da thunk that?
    Try this: HTFU

  57. #57
    Team Captain
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Does that mean that Fuel Ex will be a 29er with Full Floater and ABP ?
    No that means now you can by a Trek Rumblefish.... which is highly inferior to an EX 29er..

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Man that sucks badly. No more 29er expansion in Trek line up? Just same 29ers with Trek label?
    No real Trek 29ers? If so there is nothing to be excited about.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Man that sucks badly. No more 29er expansion in Trek line up? Just same 29ers with Trek label?
    No real Trek 29ers? If so there is nothing to be excited about.
    What is the difference? What is a "real Trek 29er"?

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    A Fuel Ex 120mm 29er with Full Floater and ABP is a Real Trek 29er not just GF suspension. Will there be a Remedy 29er because of the merge or Just Trek took over the existant 29ers and that's it?

  61. #61
    mnt bike laws of physics
    Reputation: yogiprophet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,612
    My "dealer" today told me, when we were out on a ride today, that Trek told him they were coming out with an EX 29er. He didn't know the travel or any other details, but I would assume it would be 100mm or so. This is supposed to happen this year....2011 model.
    Appearantly people are really impressed with the Full Floater shock attachment. Personally, I think it is mostly marketing and adds unnecessary complexity, but I could be wrong.

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Why 100mm and not 120mm? There is Fox Talas 120mm 29er so why limiting the travel?

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Supposedly there are more models coming.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Remedy? Scratch? Session 88? when all 29ers? Will Trek ever drop 26ers completely like GF did?

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Remedy? Scratch? Session 88? when all 29ers? Will Trek ever drop 26ers completely like GF did?

    I have to ask.....are you living in a different dimension? Trek is Gary Fisher.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    985
    There will be more models announced in August at Trek World. Some will be still dropped for 2012 and then newer bikes. At the rate things are changing though how do you know ABP and full floater work better on a 29er than the current offerings? Just because something is newer doesn't mean it's always better.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR-33
    [...]At the rate things are changing though how do you know ABP and full floater work better on a 29er than the current offerings? Just because something is newer doesn't mean it's always better.
    You will never know until you try it out. I hope Trek will expand 29er offerings for longer travel bikes. I can't believe the Gary Fisher, as a 29er fanatic&enthusiast and Trel spokesman, can advertise 26ers again. If I were him, I would really push for 29er models of Remedy in Carbon and Fuel EX and Top Fuel. I would put all racing team on new Superfly 100 and Top Fuels 29ers. I would tweak the EX 29ers, keep the frame under 2500 grams with a shock, I would pay to have a Fox Talas with carbon steerer tube with 51mm offset 120mm travel with travel adjust for Fuel Ex. It would rock!
    I would put Trek label of course with Gary Fisher Special wrting in the background. The ultimate long travel XC 29er or light trail 29er. I would offer it with XX but 3x10 or Shimano counter part 3x10 with XTR cassette 12-36 or 37 and 20-30-42.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    You will never know until you try it out.
    How do you know Trek hasn't tried it out? Just because they don't sell it, doesn't mean they don't have prototypes sitting around... I could take some serious reworking to make it even work properly let alone better than what's currently offered.

    Going goo goo for the newest acronyms doesn't mean anything. How do you know it would rock?

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    How do I know? Well it works as a 26er, so will as a 29er. Who wouldn't want a Fuel Ex 29er?

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Speci-AL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    Remedy? Scratch? Session 88? when all 29ers? Will Trek ever drop 26ers completely like GF did?
    Gary Fisher made 26" wheeled bikes right until the end.
    Specialized R&D

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by chequamagon
    You missed the point. Its not about cool bikes. Its about money. All large bike corporations are this way, Big T, Big S, Big G. Not to mention, Trek and Fisher do not manufacture seperately. Its all the same crap, and the stickers are applied to particular models to align with marketing schemes. All industries are this way, it is called perceived value marketing.

    Oh, and you missed the other point. You are a freak show and your ideas are about as grounded in reality as a Mars spacewalk.
    Okay, Chequamagon,

    You seem to know a bit about 29ers vs 26". I'm a noob, but enjoy getting out on the trail. Trouble is, I need a good entry level bike to get me going. I was at the shop today looking at the Trek 6000 and the "expert" asked if I'd looked at the GF Cobia-a 29er. I hadn't, so I test rode both in their ridiculously flat parking lot, but was interested in the possible better (or worse?) performance of the 29er that I've never even considered before. So is it the 6000 or the Cobia? Or can I even compare the two? I'd like to keep it around $1000. So, cual es, amigo?

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    How do I know? Well it works as a 26er, so will as a 29er. Who wouldn't want a Fuel Ex 29er?
    1.Hifi 29 and Rumblefish already have ABP.

    2.Now, let's assume that it DOES matter:
    Gary fisher's and Trek's suspension designs are not all that much different (Full floater is just like any other "linkage-actuated-single-pivot" in terms of functionallity).

    I wouldn't pay even an additional 0.01$ for a Fuel Ex 29'er over HIFI (all other things equal).

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    So, I guess we need another 4 bar linkage with a full floater. Not single pivot, right?

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tinshield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    So, I guess we need another 4 bar linkage with a full floater. Not single pivot, right?
    Maybe you need it, but many of us see no reason to add more complexity to what is already a solid design with the HiFi and Rumblefish. My HiFi is very efficient, comfortable and can be effectively hammered out of the saddle.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
    So, I guess we need another 4 bar linkage with a full floater. Not single pivot, right?
    No, we don't......

    There's nothing special about full floater. It's just another way to manipulate leverge ratio curve, just like the extra link in Gary Fisher's design does. It may be elegant and well executed but there's actually nothing new about it.
    And it has nothing to do with SP/4 bar (whatever that is)/multy link etc'.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Quote Originally Posted by ntha
    No, we don't......

    There's nothing special about full floater. It's just another way to manipulate leverge ratio curve[...]
    The damper is shorter and lighter. It works plusher. If there is such bike as a 26er I'm sure there is a reson for that, however as GT remarked Trek may be working on a new version of this suspension and then I'd like to see it as a 29er. More option always means more happy customers and more happy customers means more demand and finally supply, doesn't it?

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Are there going to be any trek branded 29ers like juicy Fuel EX ?

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Anyone wants a 29er in carbon with Full floater shock mount? I'll take fuel ex instead of Rumblefish. Why it is always that we- 29er riders- do not get the top notch stuff?

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    IS there no love for full floater? Nobody wants it? It works much better than Fisher suspension.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    252
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    IS there no love for full floater? Nobody wants it? It works much better than Fisher suspension.
    Since your memory span is really short, here's a reminder again:

    Some info on '12 Trek/Gary Fisher Bikes

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Ojos Azules View Post
    Since your memory span is really short, here's a reminder again:

    Some info on '12 Trek/Gary Fisher Bikes
    No direct answer, just vague assumptions.
    What exactly prevents utilizing full floater shock mount on a 29er and makes it so applicable to a 26er?
    Almost all FS designs are applied to 29ers so why not Full Floater? Fuel Ex is really a good bike why not make into a 29er? I don't want Rumblefish but 29er version of Fuel.

    Who wouldn't want another top notch carbon&light&stiff 29ers? The more choices the better.

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    Okay. Trek presents its new Fuel Ex 9.9 (tested by mtbr) where is the 29er version? It would rock in 29er format. Why Trek never intorduced original trek designs into 29er realm like Top Fuel, Fuel ex and Stash etc?

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,777
    We have Trek Stache- what about other trek only 29ers?
    Why they still manufacture 26ers?

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •