Had mentioned in this thread that I'd be doing a fluid exchange and overhaul, had some interest so, to those who are interested - read below .
For those that wanted to know Ė hereís a brief pictorial of the M-29 innards taken during my fork service yesterday. My M-29 is a 100mm model, acquired in Aug 07, with remote lockout. The fork had 1200.77 miles on it when I did the service. At an average of 8.3 mph on my Cateye computer, that puts hours at roughly 144.6 hours of operation. The RST manual lists service periods:
- short sporadic rides = every 6 months
- long frequent rides = every 4 months
- short sporadic rides = every 4 months
- long frequent rides = every 3 months
They donít define normal vs. severe conditions and what long vs. short is. In my case, it took me 5 months to hit 1000 miles with rides from 7 miles to 42 miles in length. Terrain is typical rooty southeast stuff, lots of suspension cycling. I would hazard a guess that I fit the long frequent rides under severe conditions. Just a guess. That being said Ė every 3 months is probably adviseable (once to start the season, once in the middle of the season if you ride 6 mos a year) with the OEM fluid, however, the Silkolene stuff I used is very good based on my research and once every 1000 miles should be good enough with that stuff.
My overall assessment of the fork and longevity Ė itís got a good service life potential. There was good, some bad and some frustration. This was my first shock overhaul so that played a factor. My biggest gripe in the whole thing is the directions really suck. They were translated into English and some things just did not carry over. Pics were small and obscure, and the instructions go top to bottom, not left to right (i.e. not intuitive to read). Furthermore Ė they mix in 3-4 types of forks so some instructions applied, some did not. I spent about an hour pre-reading, marking what I had to do, what I did not and correcting instructions based on what made sense. Iíve built up 3 bikes now so I figured I needed to add fork service to my repertoire. I can see why people pay PUSH Ė it wasnít hard but sometimes, money is worth the time.
- lowers/finish very durable, barely any paint wear underneath the brake cable
- easy enough to do at home if you have two left hands and patience.
- tight tolerances on the air chamber, good indicator on longevity
- all the screws/fittings were true to size, no chance of rounding a corner on the rebound/air chamber bolts
- new fluid make the fork feel very smooth again, though I get some ramping in the last inch I never noticed before
- the remote lockout is the most frustrating part to deal with on the whole fork Ė literally. Thatís a shame b/c the remote lockout is my favorite feature, so easy to just flick the thumb and stand up to attack a hill.
- the black plastic cap on the bottom of the air chamber side stanchion was over torqued Ė could not get it off (fortunately, the tolerances are tight and it was pretty well lubed at the factory so no need to pull out the bottom seal. 10cc fresh Silkonene in the chamber and it was good)
- the instructions SUCK
- my rebound knob was cracked Ė would be better if this were aluminum
- the instructions leave a lot to be desired. I documented just as a backup for reassembly.
- I donít know what weight fluid was originally in the fork, the service desk told me 15wt. What came out was no longer 15wt, it was at best, 5wt, though I think it was even lower than that. I use 5W-30 in one of my cars and it was not that thick. Pretty thin, dirty and foamy (pic below). It was clear it had lost itís viscosity. I suppose you could add some anti-foaming agent to the fresh fluid, like the stuff used in auto rear ends for limited slip differentials, or just use high quality fork fluid. The research I did after reading Mikeseeís post on Silkolene led me to that choice. The Silkolene fluid is made by Fuchs. Rave reviews on the motorcycle side with this stuff. I can tell you the fork action is more Ďcompetentí now. I do feel a bit of ramping towards the last inch of travel, something I did not notice before. I would recommend using only 140cc of fluid instead of the 145cc listed in the instructions. I may pop open that leg and dip a paper towel in to soak up a bit of excess fluid, after a few rides, Iím not getting full travel. I managed to get 92mm of the 100mm yesterday on the back patio push down test. It would have to be a significantly noticeable lack of travel though, see first comment under the negative aspects listed above. Iíd rather wrestle a pack of wild weasels while covered in peanut butter than mess with the remote lockout just to remove 5cc of fluid.
Would I buy another M-29? Without hesitation. That being said, Iím drooling over the new 09 Reba with the maxle light Ė will be an awesome match to my Sultan. The RST will move on to a 29er frame Iíll build up for my wife as my youngest girl moves from her 24Ē bike to a full size bike. Itís worth keeping around.
On to the pics
Tools necessary ( most of them anyway) , easy stuff, nothing abnormal other than some c-clip style pliers
C-clip pliers needed to hold the remote lockout top still while unscrewing it.
Mtbr's 2016 Winter Biking GearReviews and Roundups
Results 1 to 3 of 3