Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 51
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Drth Vadr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    781

    Pinkbikes 29 vs 26 DH-AM

    In what is suppose to be both side giving evidence/arguement why one over the other in DH/AM catagory: Niners, Chris Sugio come up very small and the blairing fact that Niner doesn't have 26er in the thieir line up made his argument very biased with no contrast and comparison and sounded like the reverse of the things 29er rider here from 26er riders that never had any seat time on a big wheel bike. On the other hand the 26er rep, Norco engineer had a much more balanced argument and gave due where due was deserved and argument was delivered more effectively and with evidence.

    I don't care which ones better. I will contine to ride a 29er as my Trail/AM bike and a 26 DH. I'm not a close minded fanboy, but would love to have a RIP 6 w/6" of travel as a fun bike.
    Pinkbike's Burning Question - Will the 29er Replace the 26-inch Downhill and All-Mountain Bike? - Pinkbike.com

  2. #2
    FM
    FM is offline
    luxatio erecta
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,004
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Sugai
    The longer tire contact patch creates more traction and better cornering. it's a fact. You can find it in textbooks.

  3. #3
    Trophy Husband
    Reputation: geolover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by FM View Post
    The longer tire contact patch creates more traction
    Sometimes I wish I had a longer patch.....
    Extreme stationary biker.

  4. #4
    transmitter~receiver
    Reputation: meltingfeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,132
    Quote Originally Posted by Drth Vadr View Post
    In what is suppose to be both side giving evidence/arguement why one over the other in DH/AM catagory: Niners, Chris Sugio come up very small and the blairing fact that Niner doesn't have 26er in the thieir line up made his argument very biased with no contrast and comparison and sounded like the reverse of the things 29er rider here from 26er riders that never had any seat time on a big wheel bike. On the other hand the 26er rep, Norco engineer had a much more balanced argument and gave due where due was deserved and argument was delivered more effectively and with evidence.

    I don't care which ones better. I will contine to ride a 29er as my Trail/AM bike and a 26 DH. I'm not a close minded fanboy, but would love to have a RIP 6 w/6" of travel as a fun bike.
    Pinkbike's Burning Question - Will the 29er Replace the 26-inch Downhill and All-Mountain Bike? - Pinkbike.com
    I'm surprised you could read the article.
    I'm not surprised you quoted PinkBike.
    Sorry... too easy.
    Why do people ride 26" mountain bikes? Because before there were mountain bikes cruisers built for children were the next best thing... that's the bottom line.
    Quote Originally Posted by pvd
    Time to stop believing the hype and start doing some science.
    29er Tire Weight Database

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    389
    I think think that article was the most clever troll in awhile, I mean look at the comments section how it is on fire!


  6. #6
    Category Winner
    Reputation: teamdicky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,694
    Quote Originally Posted by sakucee View Post
    I mean look at the comments section how it is on fire!

    Certainly some entertaining reading down there.
    WWW.TEAMDICKY.COM

    I get paid 3 every time I post on MTBR.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,364
    This is what caught my eye:

    Downhill, Freeride and All-mountain have been the exclusive domain of the 26-inch-wheel format since day one, and ... the established metrics of the modern big bike are probably here to stay.

    In other words, the answer is a foregone conclusion, 26" is it. Then the very next sentence:

    Some argue, and justifiably so, that the only reason the 26-inch wheel was chosen for the sport's most advanced disciplines was simply because it was there...

    That's a matter of historical fact that RC presents as though it were up for debate. There was no engineering effort made to determine ideal wheel size, what was used was what was available (and in quantity).

    Now what is used is simply what was always used. 29ers represent the rethinking of that, but still within the confines of existing standards. The assumption that there's an ideal wheel size and we have it already is absurd. If 26ers will always rule DH/FR, as Pemberton says, due to their maneuverability then why don't DHers use 24" or even 20" wheels? They would be even more advantageous by his faulty reasoning.

    With an introduction like that, it's clear that the purpose is not to be objective. I don't agree that the Pemberton came off as more objective and he didn't provide convincing evidence any more than Sugai did. Both demonstrated fairness and an understanding of the issues but both offered a fair amount of hand-waving as well. The question is why anyone would read further after Cunningham's garbage introduction. I agree with sakucee, the article was a clever troll.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: modifier's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,810
    I'm actually in the process of building a 29er DH from an older 26er DH frame. It won't have specific modern 29er geometry but I'm thinking it will be a good test sled and the frame cost me $75. So I think it is worth investigation and if it doesn't work out I can use the parts for a 26er or a 9er or Lenzsport.

    Maxxis is going to be offering their Minion in 29x2.5 so then we will have 2 tires. I've tried the WTB and it is a great tire. I still wish they would offer it in a thin wall folding bead version for everything other than DH.

    I think 29er DH bikes should be built and developed even if it turns out to be a dead end, which it may not.

    I think Sugai needs to build and offer a DH bike before he is fully up to speed. Put your money where you mouth is so to speak. Sponsor a race team. I think you can afford it and if it pans out your return will be huge. If not it won't affect sales of your other models.

  9. #9
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,906
    WOW, seriously? I haven't had a chance to read the thing yet, but just seeing who came up with it, who would ever take it as anything serious. I mean seriously, ex editor of mountain bike fiction That guy is an absolute joke and if you doubt check out his thoughts on bike fit and determining it Plus of course there's all those years of fiction he wrote for that mag. Will try to get to read it tonight and see what those queried thought and how biased they were, but straight off the bat Sugai is biased, no matter how you slice it, if not then his company is a falus (sp?)
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??
    MTB Barbados
    My Phantom pics

  10. #10
    transmitter~receiver
    Reputation: meltingfeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,132
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    WOW, seriously? I haven't had a chance to read the thing yet, but just seeing who came up with it, who would ever take it as anything serious. I mean seriously, ex editor of mountain bike fiction That guy is an absolute joke and if you doubt check out his thoughts on bike fit and determining it
    lol... agreed.
    the way the page loaded in my browser I didn't see the byline or I probably wouldn't even have skimmed it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Pinkbikes 29 vs 26 DH-AM-rcpb.jpg  

    Quote Originally Posted by pvd
    Time to stop believing the hype and start doing some science.
    29er Tire Weight Database

  11. #11
    workin' it Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,126
    Good god how is he still writing words? I have followed MBA since its inception and it isn't only RC that was a doofus. I remember shoot outs between skin wall tires and black wall tires, curved forks and straight leg forks(rigid of course), 24" wheel DH bikes vs 26" wheel DH bikes.

    People like to read controversy and people like to be on the side of the majority or side of the minority. Article like this just help you feel justified in your decision you made. If you need a couple of talking heads (no offense to NINER or Norco) to help you enjoy mountain biking you should look at why you mountain bike in the first place.

    If you enjoy 29er AM then you enjoy 29er AM if you enjoy 26er AM then you enjoy 26er AM. There is no right answer except that you enjoy riding your bike on trails, whether they go up or down, have jumps or skinnies, need 8inches of travel or none is immaterial. Ride your bike whatever it is, enjoy, repeat as much as possible, try new things, try old things, just f-ing ride.
    Try this: HTFU

  12. #12
    U sayin' Bolt ?
    Reputation: knutso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    755
    Shoot ! Why not open up the conversation a bit.

    With advances in lightweight materials will we see the bikes designed for gnar being built with a 29 inch wheel and tank treads ?



    I know there have been some weak tank tread concept bikes but will they ever be constructed light enough to pedal ?

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,713
    Simply put; if you design a 29-inch-wheel bike to have the same axle path that a 26-inch-wheel bike would have for the desired bump absorption, it will result in significantly more chain growth.

    Then do not design 29er rear wheels to have the same axle path. The is no reason to design them in the same way the 26er are.

    For longer-travel applications, the 29-inch wheel introduces too many compromises to the system

    How did Intense made it work with 2951 and Lenz with PBJ? Short CS, maneouvrable, 2951 scored 5th place in DH race.

    There are other considerations, such as bike fit - big wheels and big travel mean increased stand-over height and handlebar height.

    More sloping top tube and dropper bars- something like upside down risers. All, what he mentions, might be gotten over.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    52
    The way I see it there are two things that will decided the debate. What size wheel is winning the races and what size wheel is winning at the cash register.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Davidcopperfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,713
    Why do they even talk about 29er DH if they do not exist at large? Lenz PBJ and Intense 2951 are very rare and they lack tyres.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: modifier's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,810
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield View Post
    Why do they even talk about 29er DH if they do not exist at large? Lenz PBJ and Intense 2951 are very rare and they lack tyres.
    Well as you know that could have been said about all 29ers not long ago. Also as long as you have good tires you don't need a bunch of them. For a big bike I love the Dissents and the Minion is probably the number 1 DH tire on the market in 26" so if things progress as planed we will soon have that to play with, as I already said.

    It seems that the few who have tried 29er DH bikes like them. I'm certainly curious.

    I'm also not convinced that a slightly longer chainstay length is a huge concern in a DH bike. Besides if the rear triangle is designed right while taking into consideration that you don't need to clear a large chain ring you should be able to achieve a 17" csl without any funny stuff going on at the bottom bracket. You might need skinnier tires if it's really sticky muddy but downhillers are already doing that with 26ers.

    But hell my favorite bike to ride by far is my long travel fat tire bike, so I'm not a good indicator as to what the masses will accept. Not that mass appeal really applies to this discussion any how unless you are Trek or Spesh. They will jump on later if the numbers say they can make money at it.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    102
    I posted this in the Pinkbike article and was wondering if anyone her might know of more Fat Dad Bikes.

    I have 29ers, a rigid ss, a hardtail and a spesh stumpy 29er fsr and I love them. I will not go back to 26 inch for how and what I ride now. But, and it is a big BUT, is there a market that is not being considered right now when we talk about a 29er DH. I like to call it the fat dad market. It is people like myself. I am 35 I have two little girls and I ride when I can, I am by no means a racer or any where near competitive shape. I use to love DH (here is that BUT) but I am not a DH Racer, I am a shuttle whore or a park rider. I go out for shits and giggles, hanging with friends (other fat dads) and just enjoying the day that goes with it. I want to know why companies are not selling 29er park bikes, yes it will be a little heavier then Danny's DH uber bike, don't care if it is fun its going on a chair lift so 35-40lbs is ok with me. A 7 inch park bike could be a cool thing, don't try and sell it as a podium winner, sell it to the fat dads who want to pretend that they could win, then drink a beer and lie about how much air they got on the last run.
    P.S Dear Pinkbike if you are going to have an article on the potential of 29er DH sled why on earth would you not include LENZ and his PBJ. He claims it is competition ready, but at least he has actually built the damn thing. I think it is my fat dad bike, If I could convince my wife that clothing, shoes, girl guides and dance is all a waste of money for our children.

  18. #18
    workin' it Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,126
    Quote Originally Posted by stinkyto View Post
    I posted this in the Pinkbike article and was wondering if anyone her might know of more Fat Dad Bikes.

    I have 29ers, a rigid ss, a hardtail and a spesh stumpy 29er fsr and I love them. I will not go back to 26 inch for how and what I ride now. But, and it is a big BUT, is there a market that is not being considered right now when we talk about a 29er DH. I like to call it the fat dad market. It is people like myself. I am 35 I have two little girls and I ride when I can, I am by no means a racer or any where near competitive shape. I use to love DH (here is that BUT) but I am not a DH Racer, I am a shuttle whore or a park rider. I go out for shits and giggles, hanging with friends (other fat dads) and just enjoying the day that goes with it. I want to know why companies are not selling 29er park bikes, yes it will be a little heavier then Danny's DH uber bike, don't care if it is fun its going on a chair lift so 35-40lbs is ok with me. A 7 inch park bike could be a cool thing, don't try and sell it as a podium winner, sell it to the fat dads who want to pretend that they could win, then drink a beer and lie about how much air they got on the last run.
    P.S Dear Pinkbike if you are going to have an article on the potential of 29er DH sled why on earth would you not include LENZ and his PBJ. He claims it is competition ready, but at least he has actually built the damn thing. I think it is my fat dad bike, If I could convince my wife that clothing, shoes, girl guides and dance is all a waste of money for our children.
    all good points. Check this out with your wife: LenzSport PBJ for sale. all set up to go to the park.
    Try this: HTFU

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by rockcrusher View Post
    all good points. Check this out with your wife: LenzSport PBJ for sale. all set up to go to the park.
    If you can sell outside the 48, I am in B.C Canada.
    Plus I do not have the cash at the moment, but you never know.

  20. #20
    workin' it Administrator
    Reputation: rockcrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,126
    Quote Originally Posted by stinkyto View Post
    If you can sell outside the 48, I am in B.C Canada.
    Plus I do not have the cash at the moment, but you never know.
    It is not me but Mike Curiak (Mikesee). Pity as he was just in BC riding whistler with it as I recall.
    Try this: HTFU

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: modifier's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,810
    There is a perfect example. Mike can have any bike he wants, within reason, and he is building up another 29er DHer after riding one for a season or 2..

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by rockcrusher View Post
    If you enjoy 29er AM then you enjoy 29er AM if you enjoy 26er AM then you enjoy 26er AM. There is no right answer except that you enjoy riding your bike on trails, whether they go up or down, have jumps or skinnies, need 8inches of travel or none is immaterial. Ride your bike whatever it is, enjoy, repeat as much as possible, try new things, try old things, just f-ing ride.
    So true...

    As far as points from that article go, I have to say I don't notice the reduced maneuverability of 29ers in the real world, or the extra effort needed to spin up the big wheels. I notice the extra weight of my 26" wheel, 35lb AM bike much more :P

  23. #23
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,906
    Have to agree, my 29er feels no less agile than my old Trance 26er and I ALWAYS get comments on how fast I can accelerate, so wither I'm damn fit and fast or 29ers really aren't that hard to accelerate - I certainly ain't fit and my wheels are no weight weenies, nor are the tyres with respect to RR or weight.
    Quote Originally Posted by morphosity View Post
    So true...

    As far as points from that article go, I have to say I don't notice the reduced maneuverability of 29ers in the real world, or the extra effort needed to spin up the big wheels. I notice the extra weight of my 26" wheel, 35lb AM bike much more :P
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??
    MTB Barbados
    My Phantom pics

  24. #24
    Category Winner
    Reputation: teamdicky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,694
    I had more to say, but enough so to inspire a post:

    Bad Idea Racing: I know there are better things to get upset about...





    WWW.TEAMDICKY.COM

    I get paid 3 every time I post on MTBR.

  25. #25
    No Clue Crew
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,022
    I ride both wheels sizes here in Arizona, a Stumpy FSR and a coil SX Trail. Both are a blast. My personal rule on which bike to take that day is this:

    If it's a shuttle run or mostly downhill, I take the SX Trail.

    If it's a pedal ride, I take the Stumpy.

    Horses for courses.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. PinkBikes Video of the Day
    By Kymmster in forum Arizona
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-02-2009, 09:59 PM
  2. PINKbikes new look
    By themarsvolta55 in forum Downhill - Freeride
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-01-2006, 03:36 PM
  3. Familiar phto for pinkbikes picture of the day
    By DanD in forum Downhill - Freeride
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-30-2005, 12:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •