Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 169
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758

    The PhatSchtickel!!!!

    ...or 'Schtickel v. 2.0, for short.

    I have been kicking around the idea of a fat bike for a long time. I really liked the idea alot, but didn't think I'd ever see the kind of snowfall that could justify such a dedicated bike. In recent years, however, it seems more and more folks are opting to ride them on dirt!


    From about the time that I received the first frame from Steve, I have had a couple tweaks in mind...as well as the pipe-dream of being able to run a fat wheel in back .

    Over the course of the winter, I mulled things over & came to the place where I could really see the possibility of building a bike that will see 29er wheels 80-90% of the time, while still affording me the opportunity to build up a full on fatty!

    This frame will feature:

    150mm Maxle rear
    83mm BB shell
    New 44mm head tube to run tapered steerer forks
    A design around the new 140mm Reba
    Hammerschmidt


    The real magic, however, was how Steve Stickel managed to squeeze all of my requests for the 29 AM frame, along with a Hammerschmidt AND fat wheels into one package. Once again I am singing the guys praises...he is such a great builder to work with from start to finish! And his work...well, I think it speaks for itself.

    Some concept art







    Geometry I sent Steve



    A Few Goodies




    Build Pics







































    Plenty of room!










    We're almost there...then off to paint!!!
    Last edited by jncarpenter; 08-01-2010 at 06:00 PM.


  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MudNPink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    21

    Wow!

    That is smokin' hot!! How much longer do you have to wait to get 'er built up and on the trail? Can't wait to see the finished project ...a genius creation!

  3. #3
    HTFU and Ride
    Reputation: coachjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,218
    sooooo awesome! cant wait to see the final build
    Winter is coming.

  4. #4
    Drinker w/ Riding Problem
    Reputation: brado1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,342
    that thang Sweet! is Steve building you a fork or you using a Pugs fork ? (nevermind just saw the Salsa fatty fork missed that pic somehow)

    can't wait to see it after powder .. No Gold/Butterscotch because that's the color i'm doing mine!

  5. #5
    Negative Rep Points!!!!
    Reputation: Aquaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,960
    Phat-Tastic!



    Any idea of when Fo will take delivery?
    What the EFF is "All MOUNTAIN"???

  6. #6
    ballbuster
    Reputation: pimpbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,639

    Bravo, man!

    Quote Originally Posted by jncarpenter
    ...or 'Schtickel v. 2.0, for short.

    I have been kicking around the idea of a fat bike for a long time. I really liked the idea alot, but didn't think I'd ever see the kind of snowfall that could justify such a dedicated bike. In recent years, however, it seems more and more folks are opting to ride them on dirt!


    From about the time that I received the first frame from Steve, I have had a couple tweaks in mind...as well as the pipe-dream of being able to run a fat wheel in back .

    Over the course of the winter, I mulled things over & came to the place where I could really see the possibility of building a bike that will see 29er wheels 80-90% of the time, while still affording me the opportunity to build up a full on fatty!

    This frame will feature:

    150mm Maxle rear
    83mm BB shell
    New 44mm head tube to run tapered steerer forks
    A design around the new 140mm Reba
    Hammerschmidt


    The real magic, however, was how Steve Stickel managed to squeeze all of my requests for the 29 AM frame, along with a Hammerschmidt AND fat wheels into one package. Once again I am singing the guys praises...he is such a great builder to work with from start to finish! And his work...well, I think it speaks for itself.

    Some concept art


    *bunch of sweet bike porn pics*

    We're almost there...then off to paint!!!
    THis is focking sweet!!!

    Well done!!

    Please don't paint it white. That would make me cry.


  7. #7
    Powered by ice cream.
    Reputation: Enel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,263
    J and Steve:

    Simply outstanding work all the way around!!!

    Bravo.
    Quote Originally Posted by buddhak
    And I thought I had a bike obsession. You are at once tragic and awesome.

  8. #8
    Category Winner
    Reputation: teamdicky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,667
    Wow, riding that cycling device will be better than having...

    WWW.TEAMDICKY.COM

    I get paid 3 every time I post on MTBR.

  9. #9
    Flaccid Member
    Reputation: Boyonadyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquaholic
    Phat-Tastic!



    Any idea of when Fo will take delivery?
    Probably about the time the snow starts flying at Mammoth Mtn. Labor day weekend?

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Soupboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,045
    This is very neat.
    Professional Amateur. Disagree? Submit your grievances here.

  11. #11
    Neg reppers r my biatches
    Reputation: FoShizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    17,260
    nicely done!

    I am flattered you used the idea of my bike to build around it a phat version and its very hawt. It will compliment my stable nicely when sent to me as while we dont have snow, it will be perfect for cruising the local beaches checking out the hawties

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    87

    Awesome

    What is the CS length for version 2.0? Is the ETT on this bike shorter than the original?

  13. #13
    Neg reppers r my biatches
    Reputation: FoShizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    17,260
    Quote Originally Posted by F.I.T.nj
    What is the CS length for version 2.0? Is the ETT on this bike shorter than the original?
    ETT looks to be the same, 24.5

  14. #14
    Powered by ice cream.
    Reputation: Enel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,263
    It should be called the Swiss ArmyStickel
    Quote Originally Posted by buddhak
    And I thought I had a bike obsession. You are at once tragic and awesome.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bonesetter2004's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,505
    Jeff & Steve's build's are just way out there. No-one else is doing this kina stuff...

    Brillinat work

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: poppy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    994
    Really cool stuff, well done.

  17. #17
    Powered by ice cream.
    Reputation: Enel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,263
    Quote Originally Posted by jncarpenter




    Geometry I sent Steve

    I calculate your BB in phat rigid mode at around 11.5"-11.7"

    What crank length do you plan to run?
    Quote Originally Posted by buddhak
    And I thought I had a bike obsession. You are at once tragic and awesome.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758
    Teamdicky...you hit the nail on the head!

    Thanks for the swell comments all...I am really gonna need your support for the next couple weeks (until delivery)

    Enel: how did you calculate that? The delta in A-C from sagged 140mm Reba to Enabler fork is 36mm (that's without considering the difference in diameter between fat wheel & 29er wheel). It might net a bit over 1* in HTA, but I doubt it will be.75" at the bb. Short answer...175mm crank arms

    PS. ...and yes, this will be a very versatile frame (swiss army!).


  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758
    PS. Brado1, gold/butterscotch it is!


  20. #20
    Drinker w/ Riding Problem
    Reputation: brado1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,342
    Quote Originally Posted by jncarpenter
    PS. Brado1, gold/butterscotch it is!

    NOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  21. #21
    Powered by ice cream.
    Reputation: Enel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,263
    Quote Originally Posted by jncarpenter
    Enel: how did you calculate that? The delta in A-C from sagged 140mm Reba to Enabler fork is 36mm (that's without considering the difference in diameter between fat wheel & 29er wheel). It might net a bit over 1* in HTA, but I doubt it will be.75" at the bb. Short answer...175mm crank arms
    I don't know the difference in wheel size so I assumed they were the same.

    30% sag on 140mm travel = 42mm
    546-42= 504 a-c at sag
    504-468= 36mm
    36mm X sine 70 = 34mm vert drop at the front end.

    Now to calculate the drop at the BB. I am not sure if I am doing this correctly, but assumed 16.75 chainstays and overall wheelbase of 43.75.

    16.75/43.75= coeffecient to determine the portion of front end drop that will occur at the BB = (0.38)

    0.38 X 34mm = 13mm =0.5"

    12.0"-0.5" = 11.5"
    12.25"-0.5" = 11.75"

    It will probably be more since my coefficient is based on the WB and it should really be based on the chainstay divided by the distance from rear axle to headtube horizontally, but I don't have that number.

    Please don't let all this geekery mess with the b1tchenness of the bike.

    If you have a better way to calculate this I am all ears.

    Do you know the difference in wheel diameter?

    Was 1.5 a possibility, or no can do in steel?

    To say this frame interests me is an understatement.
    Last edited by Enel; 08-01-2010 at 08:20 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by buddhak
    And I thought I had a bike obsession. You are at once tragic and awesome.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758
    Your math isn't too bad....but I was a ChemE I'm better with chemicals

    I still suspect the bb drop will be minimal.

    I would hate to see a 1.5 HT with steel tubing


  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758
    Quote Originally Posted by F.I.T.nj
    What is the CS length for version 2.0?
    We'll have to get that from Steve (Jeff)


  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: D.F.L.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,765
    Oops.
    Last edited by D.F.L.; 08-02-2010 at 08:48 AM.
    I am ByStickel
    ByStickel Facebook Please take a look.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jncarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,758
    Quote Originally Posted by D.F.L.
    At first, this thing looked funny, but now my own bike has clearance-envy
    Don't hate it becuz it's beautiful!


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •