Results 1 to 42 of 42
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8

    older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    I have been riding a trek Marlin 29er hardtail for about 3 years now, 2-3 times per week, looking to upgrade to FS. Any advice other than to just try everything in a demo ride? I am probably not looking for a race bike, more of a trail, enjoyment type of upgrade-but with some reliability. I really want some good components, always adjusting the derailleur and freeing up sticky brake cables on my Trek.
    I am older, 55, so money is not so much the thing as a good value. My local bikeshops can order most anything, I don't really have a close relationship with any of them. I really just like to ride alone and enjoy trail riding, it is the solitude that I really crave. Don't really care about brands, but prefer something US or EU made. Niner and Santa Cruz look great, but they are so pricey. Any help appreciated, maybe from someone with an older perspective, thanks.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Welnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    861
    I started riding seriously again a couple of years ago, and I wanted a FS bike. From the riding that I used to like to do and reading about new bikes, I was pretty sure that I would want a 100mm travel 29" bike. I went to a couple of different Trek demo days and rode a wide variety of FS bikes. I ended up liking a 130mm travel 26" bike the best. A couple of full day rides later on another couple of bikes and I bought a Santa Cruz Blur TRc. I think that riding as many different bikes as you can is the best thing, but be sure to ride some bikes that are a little outside of what you think you want. Because I rode a 150mm travel bike I was pretty sure that 130mm was what I wanted, then I started riding different 130mm bikes.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,018
    Just my uninformed opinion, but you have to work pretty hard to buy a bad bike these days.

    I'd ride as many as you can, see what fits and feels right, then analyze specs and pull the trigger.

    Sounds like you'd be happy with 100mm +/-.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8
    Interesting thought on the plusher ride, that may be the ticket, the Blur looks really sweet. My back can get very dicey after a long trip. I will certainly check it out, thanks!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hobine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    216

    older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    Interesting topic. I'm currently on a pretty nice 26er full suspension. I love everything about the bike but, arthritis in my hands and elbows has been making me wonder if a 29er dually would be less jarring to the hands. I've been eying the current deals on the Tallboy LTc frames. What keeps me from pulling the trigger is that I don't want to miss the snappy handling, great climbing and just plain fun Im having on my current bike (Carbine SL).

  6. #6
    Cactus Cuddler
    Reputation: tehllama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,636
    Agreed, it's really hard to buy a completely bad bike, but it's pretty straightforward to buy a good looking bike with a few lame components that really let down the experience.

    The trail travel range bikes (100-125mm) with some more XC oriented parts specced are going to be very nimble and capable of clawing up challenging climbs extremely well; I'd put some focus on the brakes especially (riding alone, plus not healing as quickly as you once did), find ones that work well for you (Shimano is the gold standard for me, but YMMV). Next biggest part is fitting it really well, if I'm cranking my back trying to make a slightly off-sized bike work on a test ride, consider how you're going to feel the morning after a good ride; don't hesitate to spend some cash on shuffling around seatposts/stems/bars to get the cockpit how you want it.

    Starting places - Giant TranceX29 (120mm travel, pedals well, decent spec), SantaCruz Tallboy (really plush efficient suspension and very maneuverable), Turners and Niners, or even one of the Salsa offerings if you're leaning towards legs to go distances over precise feel. Since you mentioned riding more for the seclusion with nature, I'd start off looking at the moderate travel 29ers, but do look into the 650B and even 26" offerings if you can.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    145
    I just rode a Niner JET 9 and RIP 9 and they were both very smooth. The JET was easier to pedal but the RIP cruised on the flats and downhill sections.

    You can't really go wrong as long as it fits you and you like it. Ride as many as you can like others have said...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    152
    This isn't about brand favorite or buy this because I've had them forever and they're great. I'm 52, bought mine last year. Love it and it works for me. Do I regret it? No, but I would do things differently. I test road different bikes in the parking lot of different shops and bought what felt right for me. I got lucky I think but after a certain price point your really going to get an overall good bike. The thing I would do differently is rent the different bikes and take them on the trail. Giant, Specialized, Niner, Santa Cruz, they all handle different. Take them on the trails you ride. You do a lot of climbing? Which climbs best for you? Which bike has less bob. Technical single track? Which handles it. Which bike eats it up? Which bike gives you that WOW feeling after your ride? You have too many choices between 26, 29, 27.5. Local shop doesn't rent bikes? Talk to the owner and let him know you'll buy the right bike and leave a credit card for the demo. Good Luck to you.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,462
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones30 View Post
    I just rode a Niner JET 9 and RIP 9 and they were both very smooth. The JET was easier to pedal but the RIP cruised on the flats and downhill sections.

    You can't really go wrong as long as it fits you and you like it. Ride as many as you can like others have said...
    Second that! There are a lot of good bikes available today. The challenge is to find the best one for you. Each on is different.
    Last edited by Max24; 03-02-2015 at 07:00 PM.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    90
    interesting thread. I am liking this thread as I am not a spring chicken and I have been a riding novice for years. I do a lot on a bike but that is limited to my environment, my needs and my financial issues. Money sadly is always a factor. I prefer hardtails and just discovered 29er's. I am hoping to get an upgradable hardtail for personal use (back up for work use, everything I own seems to be a backup for work use) sometime this year. I won't bring my wants into this thread since I doubt it's relevant to the OP. I will be interested in where this thread goes though.

  11. #11
    R.I.P. DogFriend
    Reputation: jeffj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,508
    The Rip 9 is a LOT of bike. If you're not going to really push the envelope, it's a bit more bike to pedal up the hill than most need. BUT, it does eat up the trail, chews nails and spits sparks.

    Personally, my guess is that the OP might be better suited on an alloy 100mm travel Jet 9, (especially if you'd rather ride with 120mm travel fork rather than a 140mm fork on a Rip 9). My recommendation would go something like this: Spend the savings (over a carbon frame) on the rest of the parts (but there are some deals to be had on the carbon version if one shops around).

    Jet 9 frame with a 120mm travel Manitou Minute (for the 48mm offset as much as the excellent performance) to make it still carve like a surgeon with the 120mm fork.

    May as well hang a Niner RDO Stem and Flat Top Carbon bar on there too (with Ergon GA1 grips). Shimano XT brakes (with 160mm rear and 180mm front rotors) and 2 x 10 Shimano XT drivetrain with 24/38 chainrings and 11-36 cassette. RS Reverb seatpost (or a Niner RDO Carbon post if you don't want a dropper) with the saddle of your choice.

    Lots of choices in wheels, but I think you could do worse than going with either Hope Pro 2 hubs (or DT Swiss 350) laced with DT Swiss 2.0/1.8/2.0 Competition spokes (with brass nipples) to a rim like the Mavic EN821 (asymmetrical to help even out the spoke tension, fairly light-but-still-strong at 455g, and no tape needed to go tubeless). Toss on a Specialized Ground Control rear tire, and a Purgatory front tire (Control versions both F&R), add some sealant, and you're ready to rock for the long haul.

    Not blingy to excess, or stupid-light, and relatively good deals can be found on all or most of it. Just a good, durable, high performance XC-ish trail bike that will go the distance. Measure twice, cut once. No need to look for upgrades unless you just have cash burning holes in your pocket. To save a few dollars, you could go SLX, (or even some . . . . gasp. . . . Deore) parts on the drivetrain/brakes.

    Sure is fun to spend other people's money ;~)

    All that said, there are many bikes that most riders will love riding. Get out and ride some!

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    5,641
    If you're looking for value vs. the name on the tubes- Airborne Hobgoblin XO- For $2600 you aren't going to find a bike with a similar spec: Airborne Bicycles. HobGoblin X0

    Frame 7000series Hydroformed Aluminum Dual Suspension 29" with 100mm of travel
    Fork RockShox Reba RLT 29 w/Lock-Out, tapered steer, 15mm Maxle thru-axle, 100mm
    Headset Ahead Sealed Cartridge 1 1/8" to 1.5" tapered
    Rear Shock RockShox Monarch RL with lock-out
    Brake Levers Avid Elixir 9 with tool-free reach and contact adjustment
    Brakes Avid Elixir 9 Hydraulic Disc with adjustable banjo bolt
    Rotors Avid HS1, 180mm front, 160mm rear
    Shifters SRAM X0 2x10 with gold color accents
    F Derailleur SRAM X0 2x10 direct mount with gold color accents
    R Derailleur SRAM X0 2x10 mid-cage with gold color accents
    Cassette SRAM PG-1050 11-36T 10-Speed
    Chain SRAM Powerchain 1051
    Crank SRAM X0 Carbon 2x10, 38/24 gearing with gold color accents
    Bottom Bracket SRAM PressFitGXP
    Pedals NONE
    Rims Sun-Ringle BLACK FLAG PRO WHEELSET for 29er (28/28 spokes)
    Hubs Sun-Ringle BLACK FLAG PRO, 15mm Maxle front, 135mm QR rear
    Spokes Wheelsmith Straight-Pull, Double-Butted Spokes, Wheelsmith Alloy Nipples
    Tires Maxxis IKON 29x2.2"
    Handlebar FSA SL-K Carbon Low Riser 31.8 clamp, width=660mm
    Stem FSA SL-K Alu/Carbon Stem +/- 6 degrees, 31.8mm clamp
    Saddle Selle San Marco Ponza Power
    Seat Post FSA SL-K Carbon 350mm x 31.6mm, 20mm setback
    Extras Sun Ringle Tubeless conversion kit included, Owners Manual, Clear Coat, H2O Bottle Mount, RD Hanger, Velo Lock-On Grips
    Ibis Mojo 3
    Carver 420 TI
    Lenz Lunchbox punkass

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by chipconstant View Post
    I have been riding a trek Marlin 29er hardtail for about 3 years now, 2-3 times per week, looking to upgrade to FS. Any advice other than to just try everything in a demo ride? I am probably not looking for a race bike, more of a trail, enjoyment type of upgrade-but with some reliability. I really want some good components, always adjusting the derailleur and freeing up sticky brake cables on my Trek.
    I am older, 55, so money is not so much the thing as a good value. My local bikeshops can order most anything, I don't really have a close relationship with any of them. I really just like to ride alone and enjoy trail riding, it is the solitude that I really crave. Don't really care about brands, but prefer something US or EU made. Niner and Santa Cruz look great, but they are so pricey. Any help appreciated, maybe from someone with an older perspective, thanks.
    Like you I'm a slightly older rider (47) and just started riding an entry level hardtail two years ago. This year decided to upgrade to full suspension and I am very happy with a Fuel Ex 8. 120mm travel 29er trail bike. Not a racer either and just enjoy getting out on the trails for the fun, fitness and fresh air. Also enjoy the solitude as 80-90% of my riding is solo. Trek seems to offer good bang for buck. The Trek Fuel Ex 7, 8 or 9 depending on budget is probably the sort of bike you are looking for. All 3 models are good but the 8 & 9 have the better specs and offer the reliability you are after. I love mine.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,410
    If you're coming from a hard tail you might want one of the suspension or shock designs that can firm things up without having to reach for a switch. I'm looking forward to testing Trek's new shock because one thing I observed with the link designs that firm when pedaling is they don't have the firm feeling when you want to pump the bike.

    One other thing to consider with 29 bikes is new style geometry. I did not like any 29r in spite of any advantage the wheels offered until the class of bikes that are more slack, lower and shorter rear stays came along. That's sort of an in it vs on it feel, and a design that is great for the riding advice of light hands and heavy feet. For that general feel look for chain stays close to 17 in or less, head angle close to 68. That style of 29 not only feels great but I can turn them like an old trail bike, and do something steep or a drop with a feeling the bike has you covered.

    For US made and new school, Trek World this week will probably show more of the carbon (plastic) Remedy 29. When I did real world testing on trails the Remedy 29 had more suspension than some might need but had a confidence inspiring feel. I rode it back to back with the 650B model where that remains one of the greatest bikes I've tried and at top of my list. I'm a 29 wheel rider but wow, the Remedy 650B was just no thought to wheel size, bike, just shut up and ride anything. That was a carbon 9.8 and maybe the carbon Remedy will be more like it.


    Some updates will show here before their www site:

    Trek World

    Not US-made but WOW for fun was Kona Process 111. That is the super geometry of the Honzo with a few inches of squish. Soon you can have it with X1.

    Brief time with Turner Flux 3 and Sultan was interesting and those are US-made. They won't help you complaint about price excepting their base model build. Sultans are still at "inventory reduction" prices.

    Delay the gratification and go to demo days and rentals so you can try bikes on the trail.

  15. #15
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,513
    Quote Originally Posted by chipconstant View Post
    I have been riding a trek Marlin 29er hardtail for about 3 years now, 2-3 times per week, looking to upgrade to FS. Any advice other than to just try everything in a demo ride? I am probably not looking for a race bike, more of a trail, enjoyment type of upgrade-but with some reliability. I really want some good components, always adjusting the derailleur and freeing up sticky brake cables on my Trek.
    I am older, 55, so money is not so much the thing as a good value. My local bikeshops can order most anything, I don't really have a close relationship with any of them. I really just like to ride alone and enjoy trail riding, it is the solitude that I really crave. Don't really care about brands, but prefer something US or EU made. Niner and Santa Cruz look great, but they are so pricey. Any help appreciated, maybe from someone with an older perspective, thanks.
    Try to hit the sweet spot of travel for 29"ers (120-130mm). Your "old age" will enjoy that much, much more than 100mm oriented FS bikes.

    The alloy Niner RIP 9 and JET 9 frames would be worth considering in terms of value and bang for the buck. Since you're not racing, I'd opt for the RIP 9 and build it out more XC oriented in terms of using a 120mm fork, XC tires and lighter weight components to have a solid machine that will only weigh about a pound more than the JET if you build it out right (I've got both and they are a pound apart in their builds).

    The RIP is a solid burly frame and the bike eats up the trail providing great traction. The CVA suspension is still one of the best out there and worth staying at the top of your list.

    I've been riding mine as my "go to" and "fun" bike since I got it in October of 2009.

    Here it is approaching it's 5th birthday and still going just as strong as the first day I rode it 5 years ago...





    Size XL at 27.x pounds.
    Last edited by BruceBrown; 07-31-2014 at 12:52 AM.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squareback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,420

    Re: older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffj View Post
    The Rip 9 is a LOT of bike. If you're not going to really push the envelope, it's a bit more bike to pedal up the hill than most need. BUT, it does eat up the trail, chews nails and spits sparks.

    Personally, my guess is that the OP might be better suited on an alloy 100mm travel Jet 9, (especially if you'd rather ride with 120mm travel fork rather than a 140mm fork on a Rip 9). My recommendation would go something like this: Spend the savings (over a carbon frame) on the rest of the parts (but there are some deals to be had on the carbon version if one shops around).

    Jet 9 frame with a 120mm travel Manitou Minute (for the 48mm offset as much as the excellent performance) to make it still carve like a surgeon with the 120mm fork.

    May as well hang a Niner RDO Stem and Flat Top Carbon bar on there too (with Ergon GA1 grips). Shimano XT brakes (with 160mm rear and 180mm front rotors) and 2 x 10 Shimano XT drivetrain with 24/38 chainrings and 11-36 cassette. RS Reverb seatpost (or a Niner RDO Carbon post if you don't want a dropper) with the saddle of your choice.

    Lots of choices in wheels, but I think you could do worse than going with either Hope Pro 2 hubs (or DT Swiss 350) laced with DT Swiss 2.0/1.8/2.0 Competition spokes (with brass nipples) to a rim like the Mavic EN821 (asymmetrical to help even out the spoke tension, fairly light-but-still-strong at 455g, and no tape needed to go tubeless). Toss on a Specialized Ground Control rear tire, and a Purgatory front tire (Control versions both F&R), add some sealant, and you're ready to rock for the long haul.

    Not blingy to excess, or stupid-light, and relatively good deals can be found on all or most of it. Just a good, durable, high performance XC-ish trail bike that will go the distance. Measure twice, cut once. No need to look for upgrades unless you just have cash burning holes in your pocket. To save a few dollars, you could go SLX, (or even some . . . . gasp. . . . Deore) parts on the drivetrain/brakes.

    Sure is fun to spend other people's money ;~)

    All that said, there are many bikes that most riders will love riding. Get out and ride some!
    Older guy needs much more sweep in the bars than a Niner flat top.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    5,641
    I don't see where an older guy needs 120-130mm travel bike for comfort- doesn't sound like he'd use it.

    I rode my TBc at a bike park a few times last year, 4ft drops and perfectly comfortable at 46 years old doing it.

    100mm travel bike would be more than enough for the OP.
    Ibis Mojo 3
    Carver 420 TI
    Lenz Lunchbox punkass

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,911
    To complete the option range I'll add the Superfly 9.6 or 9.8 to represent the light and simple choice.
    The engineered compliance is the answer to comfort you do not get with an aluminum ht.
    With wide rim wheels my 9.8 has a matched front and rear feel and comes in at 22 lbs.
    I've demoed an aluminum Rip9 and Fuel Ex 9.8 on my trails. Both are great bikes.
    But once I don't need them for cushion the added weight and complexity is a liability. The solid stable handling is great. It isn't as fun and challenging on my trails...light, quick and simple for me.
    Look at the reviews on the Trek site. Guys are riding 100k races and leaving their fs bikes home, or selling them.

  19. #19
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,513
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoTone View Post
    I don't see where an older guy needs 120-130mm travel bike for comfort- doesn't sound like he'd use it.

    I rode my TBc at a bike park a few times last year, 4ft drops and perfectly comfortable at 46 years old doing it.

    100mm travel bike would be more than enough for the OP.
    Talk to me (us) when you reach our age. I remember how great my back functioned and felt at 46. Different story a decade later for most of us...

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    403
    Older! 55 is older than every year prior to it, but looking at most Cat 1 or Cat 2 MTB race results, the 50-60 year olds are faster than most of the 40 year olds and almost all of the 30 year olds! Not always the case, but if you're fit going into your 50's, watch out!

    As far as FS 29ers, it just depends on your skill set, terrain, and capacity to afford light weight….Check out Specialized Epics and Cambers….Trek Superfly FS's and Fuel 29ers….as well as Niner, Rocky Mountain, and all the smaller brand bikes. Get the most recent design/component blend you can afford. Upgrade wheels not small parts.

    Remember warranty is something to consider as well. Bigger manufacturers offer longer terms while smaller companies are normally have limits. This is not because of the quality of the product as much as their ability to absorb losses.

    In the end, its not about your age, its about having fun at your age, whatever it is!!!

  21. #21
    Cheesiest
    Reputation: intheways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,530
    Quote Originally Posted by chipconstant View Post
    Don't really care about brands, but prefer something US or EU made. .
    I guess I'm still a youngster at 37, but knee injuries have me looking at a full-suspensions. Since you prefer US or EU made, have you thought about a Lenzsport (Lenz Sport:: The Best Full Suspension Mountain Bikes). I'm looking at getting one when I recover from knee surgery.
    Last edited by intheways; 08-31-2014 at 09:18 PM.
    "Paved roads...just another example of needless government spending"—paraphrased from rhino_adv

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,410

    older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    Some suggestions here are race type bikes - not what was requested in the original message. The Lenz line suggested could be the modern geometry suggested but more travel than race bikes, Process 111 or Phantom.

    FWIW: I'm same age, planning to keep my 29 hard tail. With that, the more I shop the more it seems geometry and not wheel size makes some bikes so special (awesome). More of the new 650B bikes seem to have that than 29r dual suspension bikes so that might help the OPs concerns over price in addition to add more choice.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8iking VIIking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,252
    Check out the salsa spearfish. They're super popular for endurance riders so they have a good reputation for comfort

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by eb1888 View Post
    To complete the option range I'll add the Superfly 9.6 or 9.8 to represent the light and simple choice.
    The engineered compliance is the answer to comfort you do not get with an aluminum ht.
    With wide rim wheels my 9.8 has a matched front and rear feel and comes in at 22 lbs.
    I've demoed an aluminum Rip9 and Fuel Ex 9.8 on my trails. Both are great bikes.
    But once I don't need them for cushion the added weight and complexity is a liability. The solid stable handling is great. It isn't as fun and challenging on my trails...light, quick and simple for me.
    Look at the reviews on the Trek site. Guys are riding 100k races and leaving their fs bikes home, or selling them.
    Dude I was watching the womens XC race in the Commonwealth Games last night and the two women battling it out for 2nd and 3rd we both on Trek hardtails. Gotta assume they were on the top carbon model 'with compliance' that you are always talking about. This carbon compliance may make the ride a little more comfortable than an aluminum ht but these women were struggling at times on some pretty tame terrain that a FS bike would easily eat up. They were being jangled around just like all the other competitors on other hardtails. It might be a nice ride but there's no way it's as comfortable as a FS bike and definitely not what the OP is looking for.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DeeZee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5,889
    Quote Originally Posted by BruceBrown View Post
    Talk to me (us) when you reach our age. I remember how great my back functioned and felt at 46. Different story a decade later for most of us...
    I am 50 and ride a rigid SS on most of my rides. Also have SC Tallboy and that is more than enough travel for XC riding.

    IMO anything over 100mm is overkill (for XC).

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Sickmak90's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    788

    older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    Quote Originally Posted by beastmaster View Post
    Older! 55 is older than every year prior to it, but looking at most Cat 1 or Cat 2 MTB race results, the 50-60 year olds are faster than most of the 40 year olds and almost all of the 30 year olds! Not always the case, but if you're fit going into your 50's, watch out!
    It's because at 50 their kids are out of the house and their wives want them out of the house!

  27. #27
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,513
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeZee View Post
    IMO anything over 100mm is overkill (for XC).
    IMO - I've found that to be wildly incorrect.

  28. #28
    R.I.P. DogFriend
    Reputation: jeffj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,508
    Quote Originally Posted by squareback View Post
    Older guy needs much more sweep in the bars than a Niner flat top.
    The Flat Top Carbon has 9° backsweep. I sure like mine and I am 55 just like the OP.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,911
    There are really three categories of bikes to choose from, not two.
    The third is hardtails with rear compliance.
    Like rear suspension designs pedaling and descending very differently, frame material and construction for compliant hts gives you different rides.
    The right bike could be all you want for trails your stiff ht handles now.
    You get enough comfort and the increased performance potential from lighter weight(in some cases). Steel, titanium and carbon bikes are out there. They aren't being marketed by the big manufacturers as a category so riders have to investigate and evaluate them on their own.
    Spec doesn't offer a single option in this area.
    Giant has nothing.
    Trek has the excellent carbon Superfly models. But they don't include a single specific word about their rear compliance and comfort in their descriptions. Just the phrase "great Trek carbon feel". They should expand the marketing beyond fast race to include race comfort endurance like the Domane carbon road bikes. Probably over 90%+ of riding is not racing.
    And there are many more hardtails out there.
    Last edited by eb1888; 07-30-2014 at 08:07 AM.

  30. #30
    R.I.P. DogFriend
    Reputation: jeffj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,508
    When it comes to hardtail ride quality, one man's 'compliant' is another man's 'flexy', just as one man's 'too stiff' is another man's 'comfy'. And it's more than just rider weight that matters. Riding style and terrain also play a role. With all the various manufacturing techniques out there today, the material is not as important as what they do with a given material. I have ridden titanium bikes that beat me to death, and aluminum bikes that felt like they were made with wet dish towels. You just have to shop around and ride 'em all to find the bike with the right amount of 'compliance' for a given rider in a given situation.

    A well designed carbon or titanium seatpost can also help soften the ride of a hardtail (at least when seated). The diameter of a seatpost can also help. I know some people don't like the idea of using a shim on a seatpost, but I haven't had any issues when using them properly.

    There is even a way to get a more comfortable ride from an aluminum seat post. Rather than riding with a 30.9mm or (worse yet) a 31.6mm aluminum (like a Thomson) post, I will use a 27.2mm post with a shim (that is 4" in length), and it will ride more comfortably. The more it extends from the frame, the more comfortably it will ride.

    High volume tubeless tires will also add some compliance to the ride of a hardtail, not to mention 29" wheels vs. 26" wheels.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    703
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffj View Post
    When it comes to hardtail ride quality, one man's 'compliant' is another man's 'flexy', just as one man's 'too stiff' is another man's 'comfy'. And it's more than just rider weight that matters. Riding style and terrain also play a role. With all the various manufacturing techniques out there today, the material is not as important as what they do with a given material. I have ridden titanium bikes that beat me to death, and aluminum bikes that felt like they were made with wet dish towels. You just have to shop around and ride 'em all to find the bike with the right amount of 'compliance' for a given rider in a given situation.

    A well designed carbon or titanium seatpost can also help soften the ride of a hardtail (at least when seated). The diameter of a seatpost can also help. I know some people don't like the idea of using a shim on a seatpost, but I haven't had any issues when using them properly.

    There is even a way to get a more comfortable ride from an aluminum seat post. Rather than riding with a 30.9mm or (worse yet) a 31.6mm aluminum (like a Thomson) post, I will use a 27.2mm post with a shim (that is 4" in length), and it will ride more comfortably. The more it extends from the frame, the more comfortably it will ride.

    High volume tubeless tires will also add some compliance to the ride of a hardtail, not to mention 29" wheels vs. 26" wheels.
    Very true. Every bike I have ridden that is marketed as having "compliance" is overly flexy. Some people really under build their carbon frames. The previous generation carbon Superfly was awful in this regard. I haven't ridden the new one, but it was built lighter and has even more "compliance", which I would think would offer even more out of plane flex. You can look at the Trek FS bikes (fuel, SFFS) and see the same thing....the aluminum versions ride stiff and precise, the carbon versions have distracting out of plane flex for me, although others, maybe lighter people, love them. It is something to consider.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TwoNin9r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,691
    Having read your original post, I really think you'd be doing yourself a disservice not checking out the thumper closeout deal that switchback bikes is offering. A bunch of us have built them up and I think I speak for all the thumper guys when I say the bike has very much exceeded our expectations. Scott, tnt owner, will work with you personally to ensure you end up with exactly what you need at an extraordinary value. Check out 29er | 27.5 | FSR Full-Suspension and drop Scott an email. He'll even likely set you up with a complete build at a better dollars-to-parts level value than is available by any of the bigger companies. I'll upload a photo momentarily

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TwoNin9r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,691

    Re: older guy looking for FS 29er advice

    Under 29lbs with dropper post and decently heavy rims and tires. I've got it set up at 130mm f/r and it climbs as well as my '12 scott spark carbon that was 6 lbs lighter. And the fsr rear suspension eats up chunk like nothing else.


  34. #34
    Short-Change-Hero
    Reputation: gregnash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,334
    Just finished mine yesterday and shakedown will happen tomorrow. Quick and dirty bathroom scale weight was 30# exactly.

    Untitled by renofizz, on Flickr

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9,911
    Finding a real compliant hardtail that works for you on your trails is a challenge. I demoed my SF 9.8 for 5 hours over two days at a Factory Demo on my home trails. Very lucky. For me it's the real deal. I already have a 27.2 setback titanium post that makes a small contribution. But the main terrain problems I ride standing with no seat post help. What does make a good contribution in cushioning is a 30mm inside wide wheel. The added volume and lower necessary psi change a 2.2 fast rolling tire into one with 25% or so more air to help soften things up. I almost now have too much cushion.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    837
    I am an older rider and the one piece of advice is look at trail oriented bikes. There are a lot of bikes to look at and some are race oriented with quick steering and fast response. A good friend bought one that was more race type and he is having issues with too quick steering on rougher trails. I ride Santa Cruz but there are others with a good general trail geo. My TBc was good at 4" travel and my TBLTc is great at being easy to ride and forgiving on rough trails. Most manufacturers make race type frames and a general purpose trail frames. I would recommend the later.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    132
    Best thing is to demo as many bikes as you can. Ask each of your local shops if they have demo days coming up and also research the bike manufacturers' websites and facebook pages for their demo day schedules. You'll likely figure out pretty quickly by riding how much travel you'll need and how much weight you want to put up with and what make/models feel the best to you. Best of luck and have fun with your search!

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    763
    Another vote for the Spearfish. Its been my go to bike for the last year+. Does everything I need it to do . Very fast, super comfortable and climbs like a rabbit. XL frame built right and weighs in around 26+ lbs. Not sure what type of riding you're doing, but the spearfish handles any trails I have around my area. Havent done any epic rides but have done a few in the mid 30 miles with no issues at all.
    Seeking MB-2 Fork (19.3), Ritchey FD post silver 26.8

  39. #39
    aka Manzanita Tom
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    66
    I'm about same age as OP, and also looking to upgrade to FS from my Marin Pine Mountain HT. I live in NorCal near some great single track and like to enjoy the downhill sections after climbing up. Not into flinging the bike off anything higher than a foot or so, but I do like to carry speed through the technical/rutty sections, which on my HT results in me riding a jackhammer.

    I was talking to another "old guy" who recently picked up a carbon FS 650B bike, after having ridden HT as well - and he was loving it. He liked the wheel size, the handling, the light weight, and especially the FS. He told me to just do it - won't be sorry.

    Seems like carbon 650B bikes are flavor of the month lately - if anyone has any recs on trail-oriented setups for those (120-130mm front) I'm all ears. Perhaps this might be an option OP should consider too (if the $$$ isn't more than he was going for).

  40. #40
    Always Learning
    Reputation: BruceBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,513
    Quote Originally Posted by tammin View Post
    I'm about same age as OP, and also looking to upgrade to FS from my Marin Pine Mountain HT. I live in NorCal near some great single track and like to enjoy the downhill sections after climbing up. Not into flinging the bike off anything higher than a foot or so, but I do like to carry speed through the technical/rutty sections, which on my HT results in me riding a jackhammer.

    I was talking to another "old guy" who recently picked up a carbon FS 650B bike, after having ridden HT as well - and he was loving it. He liked the wheel size, the handling, the light weight, and especially the FS. He told me to just do it - won't be sorry.

    Seems like carbon 650B bikes are flavor of the month lately - if anyone has any recs on trail-oriented setups for those (120-130mm front) I'm all ears. Perhaps this might be an option OP should consider too (if the $$$ isn't more than he was going for).
    Here's one who drank the 650B Kool Aid and said it sucked...

    I drank the Koolaid and it sucked!!!

    I've never tried a 27.5. At my height, it would be the same problems/issues as the 26" kiddie wheels. It's interesting to read all the posts about trying to make a HT work. Been there, done that. A fully is the way to go.

  41. #41
    Crash Dummy In Training
    Reputation: PauLCa916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,403
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffj View Post
    The Flat Top Carbon has 9° backsweep. I sure like mine and I am 55 just like the OP.
    I'm 53 and my ENVE Sweep Carbon flat bars are also 9 degree back sweep and I love them.
    It's not about age it's about preference.
    ​​
    2015 Flyxii / ENVE /Chris King Carbon 29'er H.T.
    SRAM XX1
    2012 Stump Jumper Comp 29'er H.T. SRAM XX1
    1997 Rock Hopper / Rock Shox Recon Silver / 1 x 10 SRAM X9 XO Mix XT V Brake system

  42. #42
    aka Manzanita Tom
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    66
    Thanks for that input - interesting (altho maybe not much help, as I am if anything a bit more confused than I was before! Doh!).

    At 5'11", I'm not feeling like a bear on a tricycle on my 26" HT. Just looking for something in a FS bike that is about the same weight as my HT, and offers a bit of an advantage in terms of rolling over stuff while not giving up maneuverability on tighter single track technical sections.

    That other thread you pointed to was illuminating. What I don't understand about geometry and sizing would fill a book.

    Anyway, research continues.

Similar Threads

  1. Older SC Chameleon for DJ Advice needed!
    By Timm in forum Urban/DJ/Park
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2013, 10:58 AM
  2. Saddle advice for older rider
    By nagant in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-29-2012, 10:30 AM
  3. Advice re: Older Rush
    By roguenode in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-05-2012, 12:09 AM
  4. advice on older rs sid sl
    By norsk biker in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 07:35 PM
  5. Older 29er advice needed
    By Trails4Two in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-08-2011, 08:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •