Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8

    Need help picking a well rounded 29er for San Diego County

    Hello all, new to the forum here and somewhat new to mountain biking. I rode a rigid 26" bike when I was a kid, maybe 10-15 years ago. Rode mostly on the pavement and some trails nearby the house with my friends back in the day. Since then my biking experience mainly consists of single speed commuting around campus/town during college.


    I moved back to my home state of CA and am looking for a bike that will suit my local trails. I live in San Diego county and I've been steered towards getting a full suspension bike. I'm all for it and believe it will be a bike that I can grow in to without having to replace very soon. San Diego merits a FS bike from what I gather about the trails/features in the area.


    What I plan to use the bike for/what I want out of the bike: riding for fitness (flat or easy endurance oriented trails/fireroads), great at climbing, decent on the pavement (may use the bike for general fitness riding if I can't always make it to the trails), and mild-moderate downhills. I don't plan on sending any big jumps or massive drops. I don't need to fly downhills, but would like a bike that can handle some downhills as my confidence increases. The way I see it, I essentially want the fabled do-it-all bike minus serious DH stuff.


    My shortlist includes the SC Tallboy 3, SC Hightower, YT Jeffsy, Specialized Stumpjumper, and Trek Fuel. All bikes would be a 29er. I wouldn't mind investing in a 27.5+ wheelset in the future as most of these bikes can accommodate both setups.


    I'm leaning towards the SC Tallboy 3. One salesmen told me its the "right" bike for San Diego County trails, I figure he means it can handle most of whats out here. The Hightower is intriguing, but as a relatively novice mountain bike rider, I feel the Tallboy is a more point-and-ride bike versus the more technical Hightower that a more advanced rider could utilize better. I may be wrong. Another reason I prefer the Tallboy is because I feel it has more XC DNA than the Hightower, and a big part of me riding again is getting fit and maintaining fitness. Haven't been able to sit on any of the other bikes.


    What do you think about these options? I know the bikes are somewhat across the board.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    86
    I ride a Fuel EX as a do-it-all in OC and love it. I like the dual wheel options (28/27.5+). A few random thoughts:
    -people always say fit and the deal you can get will govern choice. The Trek (longish reaches per given size) geo fit my long torso the best and got a closeout price. Sold.
    -My impression is that Hightower is better option than Tallboy. Pedal similar and similar weight but have the extra travel if needed.
    -the best bike Iíve rode for what you want is Intense Primer

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    11,586
    Intense has a new model the Sniper Trail. And Yeti has the new SB100.
    Both are light great climbing good descenders.
    https://intensecycles.com/collections/intense-sniper
    https://www.pinkbike.com/news/first-...e-xc-2018.html
    https://www.yeticycles.com/bikes/sb100
    https://www.pinkbike.com/news/yeti-s...irst-look.html
    Both will take wider rims/tires. Both have slacker geo to take advantage of less travel with the wider tires to save weight and do it all.
    Who needs a budget anyway.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: k2rider1964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,848
    I won't knock any of those bikes on your list and have owned (3) versions of the Tallboy in the past. I also live and ride in SD County (just rode Calavera today, will be at Greer tomorrow and BLT on Saturday). All I have to say is you're doing your bank account a serious disservice if you don't at least go demo an Intense Primer. I have (3) bikes but if I was forced to ditch 2 of them, I'd keep the Primer. It does everything well and can be set up in many variations from 130/115 all the way up to 160/140 depending on fork/shock/link choice. I've ridden mine on easy XC stuff at Hodges as well as Noble Canyon with no issues.

    Intense is right up the road in Temecula and if you reach out to them, they will let you demo the bike for free. If you weren't aware, Intense went "consumer direct" in December and dropped their pricing about 20%. My Primer build was $4900. The same build with Santa Cruz would be $6999. The YT Jeffsy of course "might" be even cheaper if you're willing to take their E13 build (I'm not or I'd buy the Capra 29er)
    2018 Intense Tracer
    2017 Intense Primer
    2016 Santa Cruz 5010

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by JackieTreehorn8 View Post
    I ride a Fuel EX as a do-it-all in OC and love it. I like the dual wheel options (28/27.5+). A few random thoughts:
    -people always say fit and the deal you can get will govern choice. The Trek (longish reaches per given size) geo fit my long torso the best and got a closeout price. Sold.
    -My impression is that Hightower is better option than Tallboy. Pedal similar and similar weight but have the extra travel if needed.
    -the best bike Iíve rode for what you want is Intense Primer
    As a climber, how much better is the Tallboy than the Hightower? I imagine the difference is slight. The benefit I perceive from the Tallboy is that it may be better for XC rides (one of my major requirements is good a fitness/training so I like the XC part of that). If the Hightower can do a good job on the XC side of riding, then I could definitely be swayed that direction.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by k2rider1964 View Post
    I won't know any of those bikes on your list and have owned (3) versions of the Tallboy in the past. I also live and ride in SD County (just rode Calavera today, will be at Greer tomorrow and BLT on Saturday). All I have to say is you're doing your bank account a serious disservice if you don't at least go demo an Intense Primer. I have (3) bikes but if I was forced to ditch 2 of them, I'd keep the Primer. It does everything well and can be set up in many variations from 130/115 all the way up to 160/140 depending on fork/shock/link choice. I've ridden mine on easy XC stuff at Hodges as well as Noble Canyon with no issues.
    I'll definitely give Intense a look. Do you think 120/110 is not enough travel for San Diego? I think thats the toughest question that I'm facing. Some features would be awesome with 6+ inches of travel, but 140/135 isn't a 6" bike. So I would rather get something more XC oriented that has good travel (TB3 120/110) and get a 6 inch bike in the future after my confidence/skills are there.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: k2rider1964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,848
    For *me*, I'd rather have a little extra travel rather than not enough but for XC type stuff. I see your point, it's just not my preferred style. If I'm not racing, travel is not much of an issue. I do 25 mile road rides on it as well. Not what it's made for but since I don;;t have a road bike, it's my best option for now. As eb1888 noted, Intense also has the brand new Sniper but I'm not up to snuff on it's pricing vs equally equipped competition. I do know that there is a 120mm and 100mm Sniper.

    My point about the Primer was that is comes standard in some trims as 130/130. The rear shock has two settings and can also be set up as 130/115. People have been doing that and doing 50 mile endurance races. I have the Pro model and it came as 140/130. Somebody figured out you could swap in a rear suspension link off a Recluse and get 140mm out of the rear so they started putting 150 & 160 forks on the bike to make it 160/140.

    I've kept mine at 140/130 and couldn't be any happier. before I picked up a Tracer, I would throw a beefy E13 front tire on the Primer and ride 6" travel territory just fine.
    2018 Intense Tracer
    2017 Intense Primer
    2016 Santa Cruz 5010

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by k2rider1964 View Post
    For *me*, I'd rather have a little extra travel rather than not enough but for XC type stuff. I see your point, it's just not my preferred style. If I'm not racing, travel is not much of an issue. I do 25 mile road rides on it as well. Not what it's made for but since I don;;t have a road bike, it's my best option for now.
    I guess my broken down interest goes: 1) Trail riding (longer backcountry rides), 2) XC training (possibly racing), 3) Moderate DH riding.

    I think the Hightower is a better bike if my interest were: DH > Trail > XC. I think the Tallboy is suited better to Trail > XC > DH.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: k2rider1964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,848
    Seems like you want to stay with Santa Cruz and there's nothing wrong with that. They do have a lifetime warranty nowadays. I'd still build it with a 130 fork though. I'd also still go demo them if you can. A buddy of mine with an Ibis fetish (who is a climbing fool in XC terrain....he got ate alive in Sedona last weekend) was in the same boat as you. He demo'd the Tallboy3, Ibis Ripley LS and Primer. He looked the Ripley best and ended up buying it but the Primer was his 2nd choice due to how well rounded it was (especially descending) and he liked the Santa Cruz as well but not nearly as much...admittedly it was a lower level build, still 1x12 but not the good stuff.
    2018 Intense Tracer
    2017 Intense Primer
    2016 Santa Cruz 5010

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bigdrunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,155
    I ride a Ripley LS which is a great bike for San Diego. If I had to buy a bike today I would be all over a Primer at the current prices they are going for. Intense has options ranging from $2,999 to as to as high as you would want to go.

    Pay close attention to the parts that come on all the bikes you are looking at. Most of the frames you are looking at are great so for me it pretty much comes down to the price and the parts you get at the price. Intense is offering really good value

    https://intensecycles.com/collection...imer-pro-build

    Also, I would error on the side of going with a little more travel. With these light carbon frames and efficient suspension designs you donít pay any penalties on climbs etc on the longer travel bikes like you may have 5 years ago.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    196
    Ripley LS

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: k2rider1964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,848
    I guess Pivot just redid the 429 Trail as well....130/120. People have been extremely satisfied with that bikes versatility ever since it came out and now it's on version 3 and the reviews say it's even better than before.
    2018 Intense Tracer
    2017 Intense Primer
    2016 Santa Cruz 5010

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slimphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    626
    I really wanna demo that ripley

  14. #14
    Big wheels keep on rollin
    Reputation: senor_mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    345
    I live in North San Diego County. Based on what your planned usage suggest a hardtail.
    They climb better, have simpler maintenance then FS bikes and handle the downhills just fine. I would suggest a bike that can run 29er and 27.5 plus ( 3" tires) wheels like the SC Chameleon. Your skills will increase faster on a hardtail as you'll learn to pick lines and terrain changes.

    To me I find it crazy that some bike shop is trying to convince you to buy a FS bike based on the trails around here and your skills/planned usage. Pure hogwash.

    mike

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Velorangutan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    182
    Devinci Django is getting great reviews. The Ibis Ripley LS is also worth looking at.
    Best Source for Ellsworth Devinci and Ventana!
    Velorangutan... the pedal type.
    Motorangutan... the motorized type.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SDMTB'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,076
    I live in North county and agree a Tallboy would be a very nice bike for the type of rider you describe yourself as.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SDMTB'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,076
    Quote Originally Posted by 7OFF View Post
    As a climber, how much better is the Tallboy than the Hightower? I imagine the difference is slight. The benefit I perceive from the Tallboy is that it may be better for XC rides (one of my major requirements is good a fitness/training so I like the XC part of that). If the Hightower can do a good job on the XC side of riding, then I could definitely be swayed that direction.
    If you had the same tires on both, you would not notice much difference for long rides between the two.

Similar Threads

  1. How long did it take you to become a well-rounded rider?
    By 6foot4 in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 09-05-2017, 09:58 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-02-2017, 09:26 PM
  3. well well well I have 4500 lumens...
    By car bone in forum Lights and Night Riding
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-17-2014, 11:51 PM
  4. The well-rounded cyclist.
    By cjohnson in forum Minnesota, Wisconsin
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-23-2011, 07:44 PM
  5. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 05-17-2011, 10:17 AM

Members who have read this thread: 109

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.