|
-
-
Required Disclaimer: I'm the US Singular Guy - Bike Seller
Wanted: 180mm Isis Race Face Turbines. Got some?
-
dang that is epic. You guys climbing the Tatra mountains straight up over there?
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
my track stand is faster than that!
Grand claims demand grand proof.
-
Actually, a 39T is pretty useful on a snow bike. I often want something lower than 22x34. I'll probably just get a 20T granny, but still, that's not that big of a change.
-
Perhaps Alps more- some of us.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
This is a good thing for riding in Korea where switchbacks are as rare as a good Korean beer (or Korean blond) and the traction is good.
-
how does that SLX derailleur mesh with those large gears?
Color me intrigued..
-
 Originally Posted by HardTail29er
my track stand is faster than that!
I don't care who you are....that's funny right there
Happiness depends more on the inward disposition of mind than on outward circumstances. Benjamin Franklin
-
He buys an Actiontec cassette and doesn't spring for a new chain?
If you're lucky enough to be in the mountains,
you're lucky enough.
-
 Originally Posted by rockcrusher
how does that SLX derailleur mesh with those large gears?
Color me intrigued..
As far as I know It clears 38 whereas interferes with 39T. You just need longer screws to adjust the cage range or something like that and then it works fine- how fine? I'll ask the owner and will keep up updated. The teeth are a bit too protuding and steep.
It will be used on 3x8/9 or 2x9 or even 1x9.
For a 29er 20x39 on AM 16 kg is needed on over 30% ascends. That's where the difference pop in- either walking or riding.
-
 Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
Good evening to you
My acquaintance's 39T custom cassette just rolled tonight on the snow&ice shrouded whereabouts.
What about yours 39T Actiontec or other cassettes what about clearances for long cages derelaiieurs?
Coolio. Nice to see one of the Action-Tec large cassette rings. That matches a 203mm brake rotor quite well.
The 14 warmest years have all occurred in the 16 years since 1997.
-
if the hill is steep enough to warrant a 39t cog, how do you keep from wheelieing(wheelying? wheeliing?)?? i have trouble imagining not getting really, really bored at that speed.
-
39th cassette? I'm not even a *real* racer and I have no problem with a 32 as my biggest cog.
If you need a 22 x 39 as your lowest gear...... words fail.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Copperfield you better get a new user name cause these guys are on you like flies on S$!T.
-
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Whats the smallest chainring on the bike that wears this cassette?
-
 Originally Posted by playpunk
39th cassette? I'm not even a *real* racer and I have no problem with a 32 as my biggest cog.
If you need a 22 x 39 as your lowest gear...... words fail.
Did he say it would for certain be used with a 22 granny?
Here's what he said...
It will be used on 3x8/9 or 2x9 or even 1x9.
I can think of some 1 x 9 and 2 x 9 combinations that make sense to me for one of the Action-Tec larger rear cassette cogs (36, 38 or 39T). I ran a 2x9 with a 29T/42T last year up front and an 11-34 in the rear. There were times I could see having a 36 or 38 cog in the rear with the 29T up front would have saved my legs on the out of saddle steep, steep sustained climbs. And I've ridden stuff in the Alps and in California that a 20T granny and a 34T rear cog could not handle. Plenty of challenges out there and I find it difficult to criticize other riders when we don't know what they face.
I can also think of some combinations that make sense to run a 12-27 Dura Ace cassette in the rear with some chainrings in the front that you might find odd.
Lots of choices and options available.
There are climbs out there that would have you questioning your 32 cog in the rear, big time.
BB
The 14 warmest years have all occurred in the 16 years since 1997.
-
Geritol Power
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by BruceBrown
Plenty of challenges out there and I find it difficult to criticize other riders when we don't know what they face.BB
I agree BB. Every time someone talks about low gears the boys from Indiana, Iowa and such chime in with "WTF? grow a pair" I'm not sure these guys even know what a mountain looks like.
-
 Originally Posted by Schmucker
Actually, a 39T is pretty useful on a snow bike. I often want something lower than 22x34. I'll probably just get a 20T granny, but still, that's not that big of a change.
You may be surprised at how well it works. I'm a heavy rider and not that strong. I really like the difference the 20t provides.
-
meh....
Reputation:
Coolio! Can't wait to get mine built.
-
 Originally Posted by Duzitall
I agree BB. Every time someone talks about low gears the boys from Indiana, Iowa and such chime in with "WTF? grow a pair" I'm not sure these guys even know what a mountain looks like.
X2..............here we have some steep, loose terrain and some very long climbs. I also like to see people's inventiveness at work, even if I might not need or want it...good to use your brain and think. However, I have found my 29er to allow me to push a taller gear farther than my 26" which really surprised me.
 Originally Posted by Davidcopperfield
As far as I know It clears 38 whereas interferes with 39T. You just need longer screws to adjust the cage range or something like that and then it works fine- how fine? I'll ask the owner and will keep up updated. The teeth are a bit too protuding and steep.
It will be used on 3x8/9 or 2x9 or even 1x9...
Interesting about the adjuster screws. The teeth do look a bit too tall/deep cut and no ramps on the gear sides to help the chain climb up the larger gears......
 Originally Posted by Duzitall
For a 29er 20x39 on AM 16 kg is needed on over 30% ascends. That's where the difference pop in- either walking or riding.
What? Please clarify.
Last edited by Natedogz; 01-08-2009 at 11:32 PM.
A man's got to know his limitations...
-
Where I am riding marathons (in Norway), it is very steep and a larger than 34T would be useful for 29ers.
Not only for very long and steep climbs in races, but also when base training when you want to stay in a zone. I agree that I generally can use the same, or even taller, gearing on my 29er compared to the 26er, but I would welcome a 12-36T cassette.
-
This cassette can take away the need for a granny gear, where leaving away the larger front ring is becoming common practice.
It it works, it works!
24x39 is more efficient than 20x32, more teeth engaged. If you get 22x39, it's the super short gear many riders secretly want. Not that I see the use for one :-)
I would just use a 38t front ring and a 12-39t cassette to ride everything.
-
meh....
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by Cloxxki
24x39 is more efficient than 20x32, more teeth engaged. If you get 22x39, it's the super short gear many riders secretly want. Not that I see the use for one :-)
Exactly. 24 x 39 for the "everyday" rides. Install a smaller granny for the rides with the big climbs.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|