Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545

    Maestro or Smoothlink?

    What do you guys prefer? Giant's Maestro or Rocky Mountain's Smoothlink?

    Seems like both get good reviews for bumb compliance and little pedal bob. Looking at a Giant or a Rocky Mountain for my next bike. Looking for opinions on which people prefer. Is one better than the other? Does one excel in one area over the other? Anyone try both?

    thanks

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    920
    I ride a RM element 950, great bike that is a joy to ride. I like that I am bombing down the hill and see and feel a very active suspension.

    The second I start pedaling and put tension on the chain it is almost that the shock locks up.

    It is an amazing platform.

    Tested a maestro, now you know wich one I liked better.

  3. #3
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,237
    I quite like the Maestro ( I have not tried the RM ) but there is such a huge range of bikes with Giant alone & they don't all pedal the same.

    Even in the 29er range the bikes don't work the same so with out all your info like.

    How tall are you,

    What type of riding are you wanting to do ?

    What weight are you ?

    What were you running & what did you like & not like with it ?

    What is your budget ?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    6'1" 230 lbs.

    I love riding all the trails around here (St. Louis). Most are fast and flowy. There are some rooty ones with several rock gardens. Would like to expand to the trails in southern Missouri and nearby states. Not racing at all, like to go fast but just for fun. I like to ride just to be out on the trails. All the bikes shops push me toward very little travel, but for some reason, I want a lot. Was hoping one of these suspensions would be effecient enough to allow me to have more travel without much panalty.

    I can only afford one bike. Right now I'm looking at the Trance 29er, Rocky Mountain Altitude (might want to try 650b), and maybe the Rocky Mountain Instinct. Like the Element, but really want more than 95mm in the rear. The bike I just sold was a 2010 HiFi Deluxe. I felt the bike was a little too big for me. I don't think it was the wheels necessarily, but you had to buy a bigger size in that model to fit properly.Thats why the short wheel base of the Trance and the 650b Rocky Mountain appeal to me. But I am always open to suggestions.

    And none of my local bike shops have these (or will have them to demo). But they can get them, which is cool if I choose one.

    I think $3000 is my ceiling. I don't get paid a ton, especially for what I do. And I don't see our department getting a raise for quite a while.

  5. #5
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,237
    Ok, IMO for what it is worth ( I like the Anthem X29 ) but At your weight it is out, I feel it flexs lots under my 180 Ib.

    The Trance is stiffer & a good bike.

    Your gut feelings are important so be carefull what the bike shop says.

    At your height & weight bike fit is so important so ride some more bikes even if you are sure you won't like them.

    This will help you make the right choice.

    Make sure one of the bikes you test ride is the Niner Rip9 even if it is out of your budget it will give you a good bench mark to work from.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    I appreciate all the advice.

    No Niner dealers around here, unfortunately. Mainly just the big guys, Trek, Specialized, Giant, Santa Cruz. Big Shark Bikes told me they could get me just about anything though. The LBS's don't have a lot of different FS bikes either. But I see tons of FS when I'm out riding. Lots of hardtails at these shops, which I don't really want. I like the comfort of FS and don't mind the weight penalty.

    Gotta say its rough looking at bikes I won't get to demo. That's why I'm trying to get as many opinions and thoughts as possible. I know no one can tell me what's right for me, but I still want to hear everyone's thoughts.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    go All Blacks

  8. #8
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,237
    Quote Originally Posted by richulr View Post
    I appreciate all the advice.

    No Niner dealers around here, unfortunately. Mainly just the big guys, Trek, Specialized, Giant, Santa Cruz. Big Shark Bikes told me they could get me just about anything though. The LBS's don't have a lot of different FS bikes either. But I see tons of FS when I'm out riding. Lots of hardtails at these shops, which I don't really want. I like the comfort of FS and don't mind the weight penalty.

    Gotta say its rough looking at bikes I won't get to demo. That's why I'm trying to get as many opinions and thoughts as possible. I know no one can tell me what's right for me, but I still want to hear everyone's thoughts.
    Yes I know what you mean,

    Peoples opinion can be some what missleading thow at times.

    I like my FS bikes, not so keen on HT even though I have had a couple.

    I make sure I never miss a chance to ride someone elses bike to see how it goes.

    I didn't get a chance to test ride any 29er's before I brought my 1st one so did alot of net home work.

    I had lots of Giants & a couple of epic's before I went to 29er's.

    If you only get 1 shot at a new bike make sure you get it right.

  9. #9
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,843
    My advice to you is, you say you see a lot of people out there riding FS bikes at your local trails, if you see any about your size, stop and talk to them, ask them what they like about the current bike they're riding and how they chose the size. Ask them if they would mind if you took a quick tool around on their bike if it looks about your size, even if they won't let you ride it ask if they will let you just sit on it for fit.
    I think you'll garner a lot more info this way and being able to actually sit on a frame and feel if it's right for you instead of guessing, since you're a "tweener" as far as sizing goes at 6'1", you'd prob fit a Large well, but it all depends on the brand.
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??
    MTB Barbados
    My Phantom pics

  10. #10
    cowbell
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,690
    I can't give you a lot of advice here, only relate my experience. And the first bit is related to what Muzz said - that his Anthem flexes a lot. I weigh 210, and I don't get the sense that my Anthem flexes a lot. I'm not sure this matters though, because it sounds like you're interested in the Trance.

    As far as the Trance goes, if the shop you would buy it from doesn't have one in stock, you do want to be careful about how you go about sizing one. Lynx is spot on - you are in between sizing for the Medium and the Large frame. I would instinctively lean towards Large for you on that, but the Trance tends to feel long. So if you can't find one in a medium or large (preferably one of each) to ride ask the shop if they'll order one of each on the condition you buy one of them - but only ask for this if you narrow the bike you want down to just the Trance.

    I've never ridden a Rocky Mountain, so I don't know how their suspension feels, but I'm not sure I like the idea of it feeling like it "locks up" the minute you start peddling. Personally, I like some traction.

    In short, try to ride as many bikes as you can. Everyone says it in threads like this because....it's true.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,425
    At 6'1" you're not a medium, and you would definitely flex the Giant quite a bit.
    The drive towards achievement and success is the motive power of civilization.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    920
    I am 6'5 and 230lbs and think the RM is great, the stock wheels are usuable(actually quite good) but will get upgraded over time.

    Overall it handles my weight very well.

    You might not have the flex issues with smaller wheels

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    ^do you mean flexing the Anthem or the Trance? Or both?

  14. #14
    beater
    Reputation: evasive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,773
    One of them doesn't have the company name in ~17 places. I know Giant makes good bikes, but I just can't get past that.

    I've ridden an Altitude 650b and a BC Edition Element. I liked them both. The Element is a real rocket, and rewards out of the saddle hammering, but it is a short travel XC race frame. I haven't tried any Giants to compare, but Maestro is pretty well reviewed everywhere I've seen.
    "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." - Dr. Peter Venkman

    Riding in Helena? Everything you need to know, right here.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    795
    Never ridden a RM, bought an Anthem and love it. I'm 6' and a large fits. I thought about a RM as I was searching but you can't, at least at the time, get just a frame. That was huge for me. I had all of my components I wanted to built up. Anyway, the Maestro is a real solid platform. I'm 160, so I can't speak to the flexing issue at your weight.
    Small ring in front makes it easier. Small ring in back makes it harder. That blows my mind.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    920
    The flex I was talking about is in the stock wheels. The frame is very stiff.

    You will see this with a lot of stock wheels at the lower price point.

  17. #17
    Deere Rider
    Reputation: titusquasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    736
    6'3" 235 lb on an aluminum Anthem X29 in XL. I love that bike...it's a rocket. I do feel the rear end flex in certain situations...not a deal breaker for me. I would trade it for the Trance 29 in a heartbeat for a bit more travel. Maestro is an incredible design...always active and transparent.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    My main concern now is if I'm looking at too much travel. I hope I'm not. Hoping these suspensions will allow the bike to still pedal well.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bonesetter2004's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,582
    These are two bikes with a fair few differences. Both pedal well, but for me the RM (Element 970) felt more alive - here's a little blurb I posted on the RM.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,422
    You may also consider a Santacruz Tallboy as they get great reviews and you have a local dealer.
    Oh...at 6.1 you surely wouldn't be a med.

    29ers appear to require less travel....at least that's the trend which is why the 29er HT has gained so much popularity.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: shrubeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    203
    I'm coming off a hard tail, so I don't have much experience riding full suspensions. I'm currently shopping for my next bike which will be full sus. I have demoed an Element 950, 970 rls, and a Trance X 29er 1 (because the shop didn't have an Anthem). I realize that the Element and the Trance are in different categories, so take my suspension comparison for what it's worth.

    Having more of an xc background, I really wanted to love the Element, but just didn't. I love the steering and the fit, but the rear suspension just never felt right to me. It climbed really well on relatively smooth stuff, but it didn't track well over rocks and kept bucking me out of the seat. I hoped it was just the Monarch shock, but when I tried the 970 rls with Fox, it did the same thing. It was great if I rode it like a hardtail, but to me a full suspension shouldn't work that way.

    Then I demoed the Trance and absolutely loved it. Plush, smooth, but still efficient. It tracked over everything, and I could stay seated on cilmbs that I have always had to stand on before (even on the element). And it climbed just as well standing and hammering. I'm totally sold on the Maestro, and I'm almost certain my next bike will the the Trance X 29er.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    528
    I am in St Louis, too. There are lots of demo events in the area, just keep an eye out on the big manufacturers websites and stlbiking.com. Last year I rode Trek, Spec, Giant and Niner bikes out at Castlewood. It's not my favorite trail but demo events are always fun.

    At your size and weight I would look for something strong, like an RIP or Horsethief. The Trance is new and unproven, RM is probably a safe bet but no dealers around here. There are 2 Niner dealers in St Louis and a lot of Giant.

    By a big margin, the most fun demo bike I have ridden was the RIP. Feels like you can roll over anything, great bike. I was quoted $3500 by outside outfitters for an RIP with SLX 3x10, Charger Pro wheels and Tower pro suspension (not a bad price but almost 2x what I paid for my Salsa). I haven't ridden a Trance 29 to compare.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    545
    I had no idea anyone sold Niners in St. Louis. Huh, the more you know...

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    592
    I can't give any feedback for the RM's but I have been on giants for 4 years now. If you can get past the excessive amount of giant logos on the bike, I think you'll be a believer. Seems like a lot of guys refuse to like the giants because of all the company logos and "different" color choices. I don't blame them because you gotta be happy with the way it looks, but it's never bothered me one bit. I'm 6'1 and would consider that size inbetween a large or xl.....don't even bother with a medium unless that's what works for you...but highly unlikely. I've always fit well on a large and weight 200 lbs.

    Even though I'm a huge fan of the maestro suspension, I still say ride as many different models as possible. Don't choose a bike because someone online told you to like it. Just about every big name company out there makes a very capable bike. As long as your happy with your purchase, that's the most important thing. Keep us updated on your decision.

  25. #25
    Trail Junkie
    Reputation: dubdryver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,085
    I would go with a RM over Niner or Giant, but that's my preference
    ....but if I were in the market for a new aluminum 29er, I would also consider the DeVinci Atlas 29.
    Its 110mm Split Pivot (a DW design) and that bike rode amazingly. It's just too bad the nearest dealer is Louisville, KT.

    Since I am not in the market and absolutely no buyers remorse with my Santa Cruz Tallboy Carbon, that would ultimately be my first choice a solid trailbike that does everything great!
    Santa Cruz Tallboy c
    Lynskey Pro29 SS
    Cervelo S2
    Spech Tricross Expert
    Misfit diSSent

    Fut. Bikes:
    Banshee Phantom

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •