Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 201 to 300 of 304
  1. #201
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    No official update from Pole today. On facebook they uploaded a picture showing two evolinks being built and commented that everyone were busy building bikes for the customers at the moment. If you are in the front of the que then you will maybe have your bike in a week or two if you are lucky.

  2. #202
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Talked to Kaisa today. Told me mine is to be shipped June 15th. Head out to BC for a few weeks riding at the start of July, hope I have it before then.
    Last edited by depeche4; 06-04-2018 at 03:54 PM.

  3. #203
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by depeche4 View Post
    Talked to Kaisa today. Told me mine is to be shipped June 15th. Head out to BC for a few weeks riding at the start of June, hope I have it before then.
    Yeah, I got the same date for my order. So lets hope this is the final date and no more delays...

  4. #204
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Mine got shipped today!

  5. #205
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by depeche4 View Post
    Mine got shipped today!
    Good stuff. Still waiting for mine.

  6. #206
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Got mine today, looks pimp, going to wrap it with 3M tomorrow before I start building. Got hit for customs 330 bucks, not bad. I figured my time was up, 3 mondrakers and nothing for duty.

    Interested if anyone will run a full chain guide or what bash guard they will use.

    Dave

  7. #207
    SS in CO
    Reputation: Jayson44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    591
    so, what's the wait time on a frame? is what they're telling you pretty accurate?

    J.
    are you a bike shop owner? or a custom builder? I want to talk to you about your website

  8. #208
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayson44 View Post
    so, what's the wait time on a frame? is what they're telling you pretty accurate?

    J.
    I have no reason to believe the dates aren't somewhat accurate. But they haven't been until a few weeks ago.

  9. #209
    SS in CO
    Reputation: Jayson44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    I have no reason to believe the dates aren't somewhat accurate. But they haven't been until a few weeks ago.
    I haven't ordered yet, I'm just wanting to know how long people are having to wait for their frames.

    J.
    are you a bike shop owner? or a custom builder? I want to talk to you about your website

  10. #210
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    I think it depends on what bike you want. I see some that has ordered bikes in the last month has gotten theirs now, so I guess they have shipped most of the pre ordered evolinks. Just send them an e-mail and i bet they will give you a better answer than we can give you.

  11. #211
    JB
    Reputation: Nevada 29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    353
    I've had my XL frame about a week and a half now and it looks sweet! I'm glad I didn't cancel after the numerous delays. Weighs in at 9.5 lbs, only 2.5 lbs more than my Honzo!?

    Ironically, the PO was about to return to sender, I would have gone postal! Check your mailbox on a regular basis, I was expecting a notice on the door like usual, but they left it in the box.

    Now the question is which fork? Seems like most people are going 160. Is the recommended offset still 51mm?

    Edit: The website now specs a 160 Lyric, which the geometry is based around 571 AC for 64.5 HA, so I guess the new frame has a slightly steeper HA than the old.

  12. #212
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    I went 170 36 on my 158. Still putting it together.

    Any pictures?

    Also, anyone know how many spacers to use on the bb? I am using an Xt boost crankset with that new bb which is smaller (did not know that until I took it out of the box).

    Anyone running both the shifter cable and rear brake internally? I put the housing through today (brand new from a xtr shifter) and it looks a little short. Think I will just keep the brake external.

    Thanks,

    dave
    Last edited by depeche4; 06-23-2018 at 03:25 PM.

  13. #213
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Got my 158 today, and had my first ride on it. I must say that this is one impressive bike. It is a better climber than my Ripley, and of course a much better decender. The bike felt very natural from first pedal stroke. Both seated and standing the bike bike felt very comfortable. I think I will be getting along fine with this bike. Have some strange creaking sounds that i can't seem to find the source of, otherwise the bike is very quiet and a sweet ride. It is heavy, but you can not feel the weight when climbing. It is slow to accelerate, but i have the heaviest wheels and tires so that is probably the problem, and not only the weight of the frame. I would not call this bike plush, but not harsh either. It is probably something in between. But I guess you can adjust the suspension to suit your needs. It is almost like you feel invincible on the bike, but I was reminded that I was not invincible. Had one bail today, so not a full on crash like i usually do. All things considered, I can not really fault this bike. Excited to get a few more rides on it now.

  14. #214
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    Got my 158 today, and had my first ride on it. I must say that this is one impressive bike. It is a better climber than my Ripley, and of course a much better decender. The bike felt very natural from first pedal stroke. Both seated and standing the bike bike felt very comfortable. I think I will be getting along fine with this bike. Have some strange creaking sounds that i can't seem to find the source of, otherwise the bike is very quiet and a sweet ride. It is heavy, but you can not feel the weight when climbing. It is slow to accelerate, but i have the heaviest wheels and tires so that is probably the problem, and not only the weight of the frame. I would not call this bike plush, but not harsh either. It is probably something in between. But I guess you can adjust the suspension to suit your needs. It is almost like you feel invincible on the bike, but I was reminded that I was not invincible. Had one bail today, so not a full on crash like i usually do. All things considered, I can not really fault this bike. Excited to get a few more rides on it now.
    Any issues with the rear shock? Did you put and spacers in?

    dave

  15. #215
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    no spacers. no issues.

  16. #216
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Got the second ride on the Pole today. Man this bike is super impressive. It is such a good climber. I can get up almost anything so easy. Don't even have to get out of the saddle, traction is perfect sitting, and the front end will not lift. I was thinking today when i was climbing some really steep and slippery slopes that this is almost like cheating. Don't get me wrong, it is no rocket going uphill, but it just crawls up almost any slope like it is nothing to it. Have not bothered using the climb switch. It feels pretty darn effective fully open.

    Also downhill it is so stable at speed, and super fast. I have never ridden a bike that has given me such confidence going downhill on the second ride. Usually it takes a few rides to get comfortable on the bike, but this bike just feels so right from the beginning. I am sure I will find things to hate on this bike with time. But right now I am just so impressed and having a lot of fun.

  17. #217
    SS in CO
    Reputation: Jayson44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    591
    anyone have a Pole 130? seems like everyone has a 140 or 158...

    J.
    are you a bike shop owner? or a custom builder? I want to talk to you about your website

  18. #218
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    563
    I'm really liking the Machine as my next bike. At 6'9" the XL may actually be the first bike that truly fits me. I also like the Evolink 158 as well but like the higher stack height on the Machine and the less weight. Anyone my size have any time on one?

    Thanks in advance!

    -Nolan

  19. #219
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Sold my XXL Hightower LT a couple days ago in anticipation for the 2019s coming out soon but the reality is I won't have a new Santa Cruz in my hands until Sept/Oct and since my hardtail Pole Taival isn't built up yet (frame might get to me end of summer/early fall). I took the opportunity to snag a used XL Evolink 150. The previous owner shared it early in this thread.

    Being 6'8" 250lbs with a 7'2" wingspan the long reach REALLY appeals to me along with the steep S/A and long wheelbase. Interestingly considering the Evolink 150 I got runs 29" wheels there will be a higher BB height and low stack to consider so I already have some Deity Holeshot 38mm rise bars ordered to help counter that.

    The Evolink 150mm has a stack of 599mm compared to the SC HTLT:654mm, Evolink 140:639mm, and Evolink 158:652mm. Pretty significant differences.

    The HTLT is an excellent all around weapon with a few flaws, in my eyes the Pole addresses those particular flaws but it will be interesting to see how of the rest of the bike's features and performance stack up to what is the excellent HTLT.

    Personally I think most modern/mainstream mountain bikes are so grossly undersized for me that the benefits I will experience with the Pole (long reach, long bike, steep S/A will outshine other performance related attributes.

    Evan

  20. #220
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by nolan17 View Post
    I'm really liking the Machine as my next bike. At 6'9" the XL may actually be the first bike that truly fits me. I also like the Evolink 158 as well but like the higher stack height on the Machine and the less weight. Anyone my size have any time on one?

    Thanks in advance!

    -Nolan
    Stack is pretty similar i guess? The machine is measured with a longer ac than the evolink.

  21. #221
    SISSIF
    Reputation: TheCanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    478
    Tracking Machine inbound. Trying to stay calm. 😛

  22. #222
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    Received the email I have been waiting on, my Machine has been shipped.

    The wait doesn't seem as long now - it's all perspective huh.

  23. #223
    SISSIF
    Reputation: TheCanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    478
    Yeah, Bro. Hoping for smooth transport, good packaging, and no Customs snafus.

  24. #224
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    563
    As much as I would love a Pole Machine, it is too expensive for me at the moment(building a house). I did however pull the trigger on a Guerilla Gravity Smash in XXL, it is a $500 upcharge for custom but it comes with a 530mm reach, 685 stack, and a 1295 wheelbase, all rather close to a Machine in XL. I really want to feel inside the bike so stack height was the biggest feature that pulled me from wanting the Machine. I am still subscribed to this thread and I really look forward to your builds, maybe someday I will have one myself. Cheers!

    -Nolan

  25. #225
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Received my new-to-me XL Evolink 150. Coming from an XXL Santa Cruz Hightower.

    Considering this 2017 model is more of a 27.5 bike that can run 29 as opposed to the inverse the high bottom bracket combined with small stack makes my saddle to handlebar ratio hysterically out of proportion and will need to get a new Rockshox CSU to get my bars up to a reasonable height to unload my hands. The +40-50mm of extra stack the new Evolinks have would be greatly appreciated but I am patiently waiting for my Taival frame to be available.

    As it is, I am VERY excited about this bike. I love the reach and suspension kinematics. The handling style this bike requires of throwing your weight or "muscling" the bike around comes very intuitively for me since I am 6'8" and athletic.

    I will create a separate build thread to track my mods and share my thoughts but wanted to share some initial pics in here!

    Cheers!
    Evan

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-img_3165.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3166.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3164.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3173.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3175.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3174.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3167.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3168.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3169.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3170.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3171.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3172.jpgEveryone wants to ride my Pole-img_3179.jpg

  26. #226
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    Wow, awesome Evan. Thanks for the great pictures.

  27. #227
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610

    A box arrived from the Northern Hemisphere

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-1.jpg

    Machine time

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-3.jpg

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-4.jpg


    It looks like I have number 87. Darn it, I wanted number 81.... oh well, this one will do. Just fine, mighty fine actually.


    Holding the frame in my hands, it feels about the weight of an Enduro bike frame, but I must say it feels on the light side of the spectrum to me. Impressive weight for an AL hitter. Having said that, it has a substantial feel to it to. Running my hand over the TT and wow, it is such a nice tactile feel. It has some very sexy lines, either with your eyes open or closed - hehe, you know - I love it....

  28. #228
    SISSIF
    Reputation: TheCanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    478

    Machine - First Ride

    Beautiful bike.
    Very fun to build and ride.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-mg.jpg
    Big Wheels and Fat Skis keep me young.

  29. #229
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Finally got mine built as I just got home from riding in BC.

    Here it is, large 158.

    I have not set the suspension yet, anyone got any hints for the rear? I am 215 pounds and the nice people at RS do not include any hint of a air pressure. I did put 6 bands in it to make it more progressive. Coming off of a Fox DHX 2 with a 550 spring on my Mondraker.

    Dave
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Everyone wants to ride my Pole-img_0771.jpg  

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-img_0772.jpg  


  30. #230
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 1.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	42.2 KB 
ID:	1207233

    Machine time

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 3.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	68.9 KB 
ID:	1207234

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 4.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	76.7 KB 
ID:	1207235


    It looks like I have number 87. Darn it, I wanted number 81.... oh well, this one will do. Just fine, mighty fine actually.


    Holding the frame in my hands, it feels about the weight of an Enduro bike frame, but I must say it feels on the light side of the spectrum to me. Impressive weight for an AL hitter. Having said that, it has a substantial feel to it to. Running my hand over the TT and wow, it is such a nice tactile feel. It has some very sexy lines, either with your eyes open or closed - hehe, you know - I love it....
    Yeah that frame is from another world believe you me I know😁
    Where did you find the frames production number?

  31. #231
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Quote Originally Posted by depeche4 View Post
    Finally got mine built as I just got home from riding in BC.

    Here it is, large 158.

    I have not set the suspension yet, anyone got any hints for the rear? I am 215 pounds and the nice people at RS do not include any hint of a air pressure. I did put 6 bands in it to make it more progressive. Coming off of a Fox DHX 2 with a 550 spring on my Mondraker.

    Dave
    Leo recommends a much more active suspension for these bikes with very little compression and little (fast) rebound but of course there are many different riding styles so what suits you may vary.

    I would remove ALL of the bottom out rings and play around with pressure first and add rings in pairs as needed.

    From what I have gathered via Pole and other users this is what I would suggest:
    Remove volume reducers
    Set sag to 30%
    Run zero compression
    Run lowish rebound (I have about 5-6 clicks from full open)

    Give it a test ride, ideally with some bigger hits to test bottom out resistance. If you want more support for pedaling try more pressure and/or some compression. If you are bottoming out or using ALL travel on rather mild terrain, add 2 rings>

    Most riders seem to keep sag between 25-30% I tried 25 and there was noticeably more support but the ride quality went down, I currently hover around 28-30% sag.

    Worth noting: I came from a Hightower LT and if I can zero compression and fast rebound I would feel like I would get ejected. Oddly I don't have that same sensation on the Pole so don't let the zero compression/fast rebound scare you. I can feel fast when po-going on the street but give it a real trail test, I found it to be quite pleasant.

    Evan

  32. #232
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Thanks Evan, I will give that a try. What fork are you running? An LT eh, that was my other option but I already have a SC TB3 as my trail bike. I like trying different things, that is why I was a Mondraker guy for years.

    Dave

  33. #233
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Quote Originally Posted by depeche4 View Post
    Thanks Evan, I will give that a try. What fork are you running? An LT eh, that was my other option but I already have a SC TB3 as my trail bike. I like trying different things, that is why I was a Mondraker guy for years.

    Dave
    Yea, had an XXL HTLT, it was cool but not as cool as the Pole. I am a large human so the added size of the Pole really suites me and the Pole is a much faster bike.

    I am running a 160mm Lyrik RCT3 with an upgraded Luftkappe air piston, it's a nice match to my Monarch as both a very supple.

  34. #234
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    There's a stamp under the BB and it is either the number 87 or it is L 8 (if I turn it up the other way).


    Or it is a stamp that is not related to us and for factory use. Guessing it is.

  35. #235
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610

    The build can begin

    The cranks have arrived, time to build her up.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-ee-w-3.jpg

    Should match up okay

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-4.jpg

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-ee-w2.jpg


    Wheels have been built up.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Everyone wants to ride my Pole-ee-w-1.jpg  


  36. #236
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Hi,

    thanks I will have a look at mine.
    Lovely cranks btw. What brand are they?
    CaneCreek eeWings..those are beauties and pricey Will fit like a glove
    What other high end parts are you planning to use?

    You defo need this also
    https://www.bikethomson.com/product/seatpost-collar/
    Silver one.
    Last edited by Toube; 07-23-2018 at 12:51 AM.

  37. #237
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Mine says M12.. medium frame production number 12 probably..

  38. #238
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    The cranks have arrived, time to build her up.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ee W 3.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	23.1 KB 
ID:	1209296

    Should match up okay

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 4.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	76.7 KB 
ID:	1209297

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ee W2.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	22.4 KB 
ID:	1209294


    Wheels have been built up.
    🤤🤤🤤

  39. #239
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    That's a thought, it could be Large 8 to. haha

  40. #240
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610

    I am Polarised

    It looks fast sitting still

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-10-7.jpg

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-13.jpg

    This is my first bike in 10 years that has no carbon.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-16.jpg

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-20.jpg

  41. #241
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    It looks fast sitting still
    Looks sick congrats on a beautiful bike build.
    7075 T6 aluminium is good quality and should perform just as good as carbon in the mtb scene.
    Chromag stem, I also have the BSA stem but in red to suit to fork
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-cm5oezp.jpg
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-hhgg7tt.jpg
    Some bb protection
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-b4ymx88.jpg
    stopping power
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-xsv0zi4.jpg

  42. #242
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    Excellent Toube. Likewise, nice bike mate.

    Hey I hate you for your brakes. I have some on order, but they are making them so it is months in the making. I can't wait to get them. Have you ridden yours how do they feel.

    I at least got the pad upgrade to get me by.

    Cheers
    W

  43. #243
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Holy shit those bikes are so pimp!

  44. #244
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    Did I show you my Pole Hole, inside the head tube shot. If you love metal work and machining the Machine is amazballs.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-hole.jpg

    And here is a rear end shot.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-pole-18-2.jpg


    I will be building up a rear coil shock for it soon. There's a coil in the front fork to match it up with.

  45. #245
    SISSIF
    Reputation: TheCanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    Did I show you my Pole Hole, inside the head tube shot. If you love metal work and machining the Machine is amazballs.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole hole.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	40.0 KB 
ID:	1209776

    And here is a rear end shot.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 18 2.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	121.0 KB 
ID:	1209777


    I will be building up a rear coil shock for it soon. There's a coil in the front fork to match it up with.
    Great build! So are you running the PUSH ACS3 conversion at 170mm? I'm thinking that would be a good fit. The 180 Lyrik I have is more like 170 anyway with the debonair larger negative spring suck down.
    Hope to hear a ride report soon.
    Big Wheels and Fat Skis keep me young.

  46. #246
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    Did I show you my Pole Hole, inside the head tube shot. If you love metal work and machining the Machine is amazballs.
    I will be building up a rear coil shock for it soon. There's a coil in the front fork to match it up with.
    Coil shock up front, do the Fox fork have a coil inside?
    This one is currently being tested by Pole itself and is also a recommendation by Pole for a coil shock:
    https://dirtmountainbike.com/dirt-100/2018/ext-arma/

    I going to ride my bike with the stock RS super deluxe for a year or two.
    I also just received Robert Axle Project thru axles with out any QRL:s

    Any hows I've done 4 rides on the machine and would like to do more but my back just couldn't take it and I had a major lumbago last Sunday so it's rest for me now.

    In comparison with my previous bike (Pole Evolink 150) on the local trails:
    - The Machine is much more confident inspiring as a whole bike than evolink was
    - Suspension is soft and plush and the grip is enormous.. just grips and you don't need to worry about anything
    - Feels like you can go over any obstacle and rock that is in your path.. if you have the courage of course
    - Climbing is very good
    - Downhill.. well I don't have that steeps downhills in my local trails but the ones that are found I just push the bike as hard as I can and still it just feels like the bike is nowhere near it's limits.. my limits perhaps

    About the brakes.. I need to shorten my brake hoses.. they are currently way too long.. but first I need a bleed kit for them.. I was lucky enough to find a pair online without the 6-9 months waiting time

    They have unbelievable stopping power in them.. One finger seems almost to powerful.. but they do really offer a great progression when braking so you don't have to use much power.. but there is a learning curve for those also.. use too much power and your in for a surprise at least with the front brake

  47. #247
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ninjichor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    384
    How does coil up front work? Do they have anything that addresses bottom out resistance, such as hydraulic bottom out (e.g. EXT Arma and Manitou Mattoc Pro)? I notice that EXT doesn't have a bumper like commonly seen on other coils for the purpose of providing spring rate ramp, because it has that feature built-in. That bottom out bumper was at least useful for reporting how much sag you have, when comparing to other users, by just sliding it up like an o-ring. xD I'm considering just ditching tokens and adding in neopos instead in my fork, to get it to be more coil-like, but with at least some ramp.

    I'd like to hear more about the extreme forward geometry and how people find themselves pedaling in bumpy tech. Typically I just hover over the saddle on my bike, but I sort of push away from the bar and the cranks in sort of a rearward direction, which sort of suspends/isolates me from the bumps to allow me to pedal continuously. When I tried this on a steep STA bike, I found myself wanting to push back still, and it was too upright to comfortably stay "centered" over the saddle. I'm thinking the zone between standard slackness (73d) and steep (77-79d) is no man's land or something. Might have to verify on a new-school hardtail, since a HT is what I initially drilled the technique on, mainly to keep the rear from bouncing too high over bumps and to keep bumps from transferring into my back.

  48. #248
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by ninjichor View Post
    How does coil up front work? Do they have anything that addresses bottom out resistance, such as hydraulic bottom out (e.g. EXT Arma and Manitou Mattoc Pro)? I notice that EXT doesn't have a bumper like commonly seen on other coils for the purpose of providing spring rate ramp, because it has that feature built-in. That bottom out bumper was at least useful for reporting how much sag you have, when comparing to other users, by just sliding it up like an o-ring. xD I'm considering just ditching tokens and adding in neopos instead in my fork, to get it to be more coil-like, but with at least some ramp.

    I'd like to hear more about the extreme forward geometry and how people find themselves pedaling in bumpy tech. Typically I just hover over the saddle on my bike, but I sort of push away from the bar and the cranks in sort of a rearward direction, which sort of suspends/isolates me from the bumps to allow me to pedal continuously. When I tried this on a steep STA bike, I found myself wanting to push back still, and it was too upright to comfortably stay "centered" over the saddle. I'm thinking the zone between standard slackness (73d) and steep (77-79d) is no man's land or something. Might have to verify on a new-school hardtail, since a HT is what I initially drilled the technique on, mainly to keep the rear from bouncing too high over bumps and to keep bumps from transferring into my back.
    Isn't neopos only for Formula forks?
    Are you talking about a bump stopper?
    I usually just sit down on the Machine / evolink when climbing bumpy rock gardens.. if steep enough then I just stand up and lean forward a bit but not too much so that I don't loose grip. The long front is pretty good at keeping the wheel planted.. it might rise a bit but nothing dramatic.

  49. #249
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    No more QRL in the way replaced with Robert Axle Project thru Axles
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-3evtbld.jpg

  50. #250
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ninjichor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by Toube View Post
    Isn't neopos only for Formula forks?
    Are you talking about a bump stopper?
    I usually just sit down on the Machine / evolink when climbing bumpy rock gardens.. if steep enough then I just stand up and lean forward a bit but not too much so that I don't loose grip. The long front is pretty good at keeping the wheel planted.. it might rise a bit but nothing dramatic.
    Oh ya, I forgot that Pole runs long chainstays, so the wheels are extra planted. Nm, no apples to apples comparison to be found in this thread. xD

    Neopos just drops right into a positive air spring chamber. Was designed for a 35mm stanchion, but may fit in a 34. Not sure if it can fit in a '16 36, considering it has a transfer shaft, but there are holes in the neopos. The spring rate change it promises reminds me of the Manitou IRT's marketing. Just hope they don't make noise, since they're not secured to anything.

    The Push ACS has a secondary spring that serves to offer bottom-out resistance. I'm just not familiar with other coil forks, like the Ohlins, Ribbon, Helm, and whatever else I don't know about. Do these guys not have any anti-bottom-out feature?

  51. #251
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    Iím not familiar with those either, but Iím pretty sure all of them have either a heavy rate air spring on top of the coil spring like the push or they manage it hydraulically in the damper like the avalanche cart. Itís basically a tapered cone at the top of the damper that displaces oil resting in a cup, also on top of the damper, providing gradual bottom out support in the last 20ish mm of travel.

  52. #252
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    It looks fast sitting still

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 10 7.jpg 
Views:	140 
Size:	165.2 KB 
ID:	1209700

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 13.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	66.5 KB 
ID:	1209697

    This is my first bike in 10 years that has no carbon.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 16.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	81.3 KB 
ID:	1209698

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pole 20.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	81.7 KB 
ID:	1209696
    Definitely a beauty. Did you weigh the frame. I only remember seeing a video a few months ago when they were still developing it and they said it was 5.5kg (w/o shock). I know this is enduro/park bike - but hopefully they cut some of the porkiness out.

  53. #253
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    Finally got a proper day on my mine. Using it at the bike park, the one thing that blew me away is the traction. I remember I felt on edge sometimes on my dh bike, this, not one bit. For a bike that has a crazy reach number it does not feel that way. I only have a 30 mm stem on it but that was the same as my foxy with a 500 reach and that just felt more radical in a way. Then again, that was 3 years ago when longer front ends were almost blasphemy to the industry, especially here in North America.

    Set up was not bad, at 215 with shit on I have 250 psi in the rear with 6 clicks from out. I also have 6 bands so it is nice and progressive.

    It was nice and slick clay today, so I did not let it go, plus the first real ride. It is very fast in a straight line.

    Dave
    Last edited by depeche4; 07-27-2018 at 03:19 PM.

  54. #254
    SISSIF
    Reputation: TheCanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothmoose View Post
    Definitely a beauty. Did you weigh the frame. I only remember seeing a video a few months ago when they were still developing it and they said it was 5.5kg (w/o shock). I know this is enduro/park bike - but hopefully they cut some of the porkiness out.
    Medium frame 3.58kg w/o shock.
    Big Wheels and Fat Skis keep me young.

  55. #255
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by depeche4 View Post
    Finally got mine built as I just got home from riding in BC.

    Here it is, large 158.

    I have not set the suspension yet, anyone got any hints for the rear? I am 215 pounds and the nice people at RS do not include any hint of a air pressure. I did put 6 bands in it to make it more progressive. Coming off of a Fox DHX 2 with a 550 spring on my Mondraker.

    Dave
    Sweet build Dave, I really like that Fox Grip 2 fork.. orange is the new black
    Poles are bad asses when it comes to descending.. climbing is also not a problem for the bikes..you just need some power in your legs and it will climb up a tree

  56. #256
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610

    First ride down south

    Only two short rides and already I can see that this is going to be a very positive experience. The bike is up there with other top line bikes. It is a class act. I look forward to exploring its limits and nuances.

    Some early notes are: Great comfort, great grip, great pedalling, surprising manoeuvrability and of course balance.

    The seating position and cockpit is one of the best I have experienced. There is a real connection between seat up and seat down locations. At times you can raise the seat (tired of sprinting Ė howís that core) and the positions match so well that you sustain your speed, seated or standing. Very interesting.

    One personal caveat is that I am used to steep SA and slack HA, the Machine is spot on for cockpit ergonomics (I suspect I could have it slacker for steep stuff, we shall see). Very comfortable and once rolling, very Zen as you disappear into the bike. Super natural to ride. And seated riding can be fast, even through the jinky janky stuff.

    Pedalling efficiency is excellent for a 160mm travel bike. Remember your first ride on a Nomad 3 way back that first time years ago, how well that pedalled, well the Machine is better than that and add to that the 29er wheels, it rolls fast to boot. Bang up to date pedalling characteristics.

    In fact, if you pedal nice and smooth you can really motor along and get your XC on. Up slight single track upgrades, you can build some seriously good rolling speed. If it gets steeper and you must dig in on the pedals, then you can feel that you have longer travel Ė not bad at all or ill-mannered or bobby, good, normal for the travel range you are carrying Ė natural and expected at some stage. I only rode it in open setting. Flat and gentle up and down, you can grind out some serious speed it is very efficient.

    As the down gets steeper, the famous Pole suspension lets fly (antisquat drops away) and the rolling speed picks up another notch. It goes. Very fast.

    Handling is intuitive. In some parts I was jinking some trail bike tracks, with trick berms and little doubles and rollers etc, bread and butter fun stuff. I was smiling and enjoying, take command and it is very capable of attacking nimble. I was immediately ripping it in hard and throwing it about with surprising abandon, we had got on together very quickly for a new steed. Could you do super tight stuff for 2 hours, probably not, but when fresh-ish, it is just as fun. Tight isnít an issue, but if you are doing tight for 80% of your ride, which you wouldnít if you bought a bike like this, then I can imagine it would tire you because you have to command the inputs, not impossible not scary, just purposeful.

    I approached a few well known loose corners, where I know to get the foot out for some moto action, twice the bike just ripped around and I had to put my foot back. Super grip. Other times into loose over hard corners where (in the past) I get some slip and feel for it under the tyres and manage my lean angle while you pucker and wait for more slip than you want at speed, again, no slip just grip and speed. I was lifting my vision earlier with this Machine.

    This Machine has some speed.

    Only a trail bike centre ride but I can tell this has plenty in reserve. It wasnít un-enjoyable to ride as a trail bike. It was surprisingly fun, but that could be the honeymoon phase talking. I tend to always pedal harder on a new bike. I shall step up the terrain now and see how it goes on some steeper stuff.

  57. #257
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamK View Post
    Only two short rides and already I can see that this is going to be a very positive experience. The bike is up there with other top line bikes. It is a class act. I look forward to exploring its limits and nuances.

    I shall step up the terrain now and see how it goes on some steeper stuff.
    Hi WilliamK,
    great write up.. the Machine will take you were you wanna go
    What suspension setup did you use? Mainly on the rear suspension, sag etc?

  58. #258
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Been torn between the Machine and the Rallon. Any thoughts either way?

  59. #259
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    Hey mrazz both options are high quality bikes, so you won't go too far wrong. I saw the Rallon when it came out, it looked progressive enough for me to consider. I have seen some comparo reviews on the Rallon and they suggest it doesn't go down as hard or fast as other options - like a Commencal 29 or Sentinel. So may be the Rallon's spectrum of riding shades into big trail bike terrority a little. The Machine I believe will give you a whole lot more in the fast realms and yet is a damn fine pedalling machine. Both are a top of the line choice.

  60. #260
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ninjichor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    384
    Heard the Rallon was an all-rounder bike. I interpret that it's meant to take the place over many bikes in a quiver. Not a bike that is optimized to do anything particularly well.

    Not much of a clue about the Machine, but it is a lot more exciting to me. There will be lots more bikes like the Rallon, as it's made in the mainstream style, which is kind of like the bike you want to settle down with long term. A top quality mainstream style bike is expected to last 3+ years, but I never saw a bike last 5 digit mileage #s before people find it perhaps being too loose and rickety. The Machine is an exotic thing that would give you higher "highs". I consider it to be a the daring choice for adventurous types. If you replace bikes after ~2 years, I think it's a more memorable experience to get bikes with such strong personality.

  61. #261
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    True. It is a very pure ride. Pure raw metal, pure suspension because you hardly need any valve restrictions.

    And the blasted thing just doesn't stop shinning no matter how dusty it is.

  62. #262
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    610
    I managed a longer ride today and I can say this is a truly great bike. I managed to relax and soak it up, push a little and explore.

    Again, that seating position is amazing, really good for FBTBR posture. (Fat Bastard Trail Bike Riding). Ride fast, but lazy in the core and needing to sit down for stretches, while pedalling like a bastard.

    You can hammer the trails seated. The bike feels like a medium at times, but what it is really doing is presenting your weight more forward thus maximising grip and overall steering. It is messing with my mind, in a good way Ė I swear I am going to run a tape measure over it.

    It is always exciting when you can immediately get into a bike and attack straight out of the box. I am 90% fast straight away. The Machine is well sorted, just press go.

    The bike melds into you and you into it, it does not feel big. And then when you go home, it is hard to fit into your car. How did they do thatÖ So counterintuitively you just attack little pops and hops and muck about. It is surprisingly manoeuvrable and certainly not restrictive. And when you give it some head and attack real cream, the faster and steeper stuff, it opens the taps, or should I say floodgates. Personally, I am finding it extremely versatile.

    I rode some tracks today that I have been riding for years, and in a few parts I am inventing new lines and finding some new ones, it is a totally fun ride because it is so engaging. The new lines were predominantly all off chamber stuff. The balance and the speed bring new levels of disregard and bravado. A few corners I would take the wider line in, over non-ideal terrain and find new in speed and better exit speed.

    Pole have really weaponised the grip with this Machine.

  63. #263
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Quote Originally Posted by mrazz001 View Post
    Been torn between the Machine and the Rallon. Any thoughts either way?
    Other guys have mentioned it but if you but some forethought into the style of riding you do and pic a decent offering which matches up with the intended use, it's really hard to go wrong as so many bikes are capable weapons.

    That being said I feel like Pole is waiting at the finish line of the geometry game while all other bike companies (minus Nicolai) are inching their way closer. With more and more Pole frames starting to circulate the world owners and journalists have real world saddle time are validating the enhanced capabilities of the frames.

    Evan

  64. #264
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    158
    +1!

  65. #265
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Thanks for the replays. I put in an order for a Large Machine. I like different, Iím just hoping itís not going to be too much bike.

  66. #266
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    17
    Hi guys I'm following with interest this topic, someone can share other impression on the evolink 158?
    Thank you

  67. #267
    Here, diagonally!
    Reputation: JACKL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,012
    Really intrigued by the Machine and Evo 158. I'm a clyde, and the XL geo is real close to what I am looking for. The Machine is pure sex, although I'm a practical guy and would probably go for the EVO 158.

    By all reports the Evolinks pedal very well, despite the AS curve that seems similar to Spechy FSR bikes, which have been awful for me during demos. I realize numbers don't make the bike, but I have my concerns, as I don't have any excess energy to spare on pedal bob. Certainly the long rear stays would offset the falling AS curve to some degree. And I am fine with running a progressive spring rate in the rear shock, but not ok with running excessive compression damping to get the bike to pedal well.

    Curious about rear tire clearance. Does a 2.6 fit with room to spare?

    My wallet is safe for now, as I have a really good bike, and need all the boxes checked to get a new frame. One of those is a 157 rear.

  68. #268
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    All fs bikes bob. I don't notice any excessive bobing on the 158.

    You could probably fit a 3" tire with room to spare.

  69. #269
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    377
    Hi guys, by any chance is there a pic of a small or medium size evolink 140? I am 5'8" and am wondering if a small or medium would be best for me in case I do get them.
    From the website, I on the lower side of a medium frame. Thnks

  70. #270
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Go for the medium. My gf is 5'6 and prob in between sizing of an s and m, and she is comfortable on a medium 158. Not much difference in geo between the 158 and 140.

  71. #271
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    377
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    Go for the medium. My gf is 5'6 and prob in between sizing of an s and m, and she is comfortable on a medium 158. Not much difference in geo between the 158 and 140.
    Thank you for the reply. Will be much appreciated if you have a pic of the bike.

  72. #272
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    Go for the medium. My gf is 5'6 and prob in between sizing of an s and m, and she is comfortable on a medium 158. Not much difference in geo between the 158 and 140.
    I am a beginner and have only biked for 3 months, but already after 1 month i saw sonething was pretty wrong with my bike vs my wife. For some idiotic reason bikes only grow in height and not in lenght percent wise so the bikes is only for hobittes. I feel cheated and cant understand the entire industry is so conservative. Look at people riding and its pretty evident. The consequence is also people is hurt and disabled. Its serious.

    Now. For the light trails and minor 60cm drops i do a machine en seems like a lot of bike. But i want the safety and stability from the wheelbase and actually think the suspension is ok. But is there any other alternatives to pole?
    The 131 seems ok but i like state of the art but if i dont do endure at least the next 6 months lol- does a machine then make sense?

    I am 180.5 and all normal size - is it large i need?

  73. #273
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by krumme View Post
    I am a beginner and only have biked for 3 months, but already after 1 month i saw sonething was pretty wrong with my bike vs my wife. For some idiotic reason bikes only grow in height and not in lenght percent wise so the bikes is only for hobittes. I feel cheated and cant understand the entire industry is so conservative. Look at people riding and its pretty evident. The consequence is also people is hurt and disabled. Its serious.

    Now. For the light trails and minor 60cm drops i do a machine en seems like a lot of bike. But i want the safety and stability from the wheelbase and actually think the suspension is ok. But is there any other alternatives to pole?
    The 131 seems ok but i like state of the art but if you dont do endure for at least for the next 6 months lol- does a machine then make sense?

    I am 180.5 and all nornal size - is it large i need?
    I'm 183 cm and use and M size of the Machine. My old evolink 150 was a L size. The M sized machine is not too small just a bit more nimble and agile than the L sized evolink was..
    And how it rides well that's what you can call a superbike ride

  74. #274
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by mojak View Post
    Thank you for the reply. Will be much appreciated if you have a pic of the bike.
    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-lrm_export_20180813_191925.jpg

  75. #275
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by Toube View Post
    I'm 183 cm and use and M size of the Machine. My old evolink 150 was a L size. The M sized machine is not too small just a bit more nimble and agile than the L sized evolink was..
    And how it rides well that's what you can call a superbike ride
    Thanx. Is the reach and stack numbers comparable to other bikes?

    How nimble is nimble?
    ( i mean when i imagine a finish guy thinking nimble its him getting his grandpa old volvo 240 tuning it to 560hp and driving like crazy and halfdrunk down a fireroad)

  76. #276
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by krumme View Post
    Thanx. Is the reach and stack numbers comparable to other bikes?

    How nimble is nimble?
    ( i mean when i imagine a finish guy thinking nimble its him getting his grandpa old volvo 240 tuning it to 560hp and driving like crazy and halfdrunk down a fireroad)
    I would say it has a good reach for an M frame.
    For example Mondraker Dune R M frame has a reach of 470mm and Machine M frame 480 mm.
    You can always play around with a longer or shorter stem etc.
    Well as a Finn I wouldn't say nimble is a tuned Volvo 240.. they can probably be nimble too.. but more like a nowadays hothatch
    BMW M140i.. happens to be the car I currently drive.. it is a bit tuned but so is my Machine all for better driveability.

  77. #277
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43
    I just recently changed all family to flats even if they complained a lot. Might as well learn it while we are beginners. Any special thoughts of pole and flats?

    Sorry for the noob questions.

  78. #278
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by krumme View Post
    I just recently changed all family to flats even if they complained a lot. Might as well learn it while we are beginners. Any special thoughts of pole and flats?

    Sorry for the noob questions.
    Np, I can't comment on the flats because I have only been using flats on all my bikes

  79. #279
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Email Pole and ask them for a frame size recommendation. Iím 183cm and they recommended a large frame, so thatís what I ordered.

  80. #280
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by mrazz001 View Post
    Email Pole and ask them for a frame size recommendation. Iím 183cm and they recommended a large frame, so thatís what I ordered.
    Yeah they will recommend a Large but an M size will also work.

  81. #281
    Bigger is better!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    702
    I've ordered an XL Evolink 140, really looking forward to it!

    But I haven't decided what length Pike to get.
    150 or 160mm? Does anyone have a recommendation?


    (I already have a 140 Pike, which I'll upgrade with a Debonair upgrade kit.)

  82. #282
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LRM_EXPORT_20180813_191925.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	128.1 KB 
ID:	1212040
    Gorgeous bike! Iíd really appreciate a few more pics if you could post em. Thought I was sold on blue until I saw this beauty. I havenít seen any other images of the yellow around. Thanks.

  83. #283
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Toube's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by PurpleMtnSlayer View Post
    Gorgeous bike! Iíd really appreciate a few more pics if you could post em. Thought I was sold on blue until I saw this beauty. I havenít seen any other images of the yellow around. Thanks.
    Hi,
    please go here and browse the images:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/pole...riders/photos/

  84. #284
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    Thanks!

  85. #285
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by PurpleMtnSlayer View Post
    Gorgeous bike! Iíd really appreciate a few more pics if you could post em. Thought I was sold on blue until I saw this beauty. I havenít seen any other images of the yellow around. Thanks.
    It is a pain in the anus to upload pictures to this forum. And I usually don't take any pictures when im out riding, but yesterday i did take a couple just for you. Enjoy.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Everyone wants to ride my Pole-lrm_export_20180827_124633.jpg  

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-lrm_export_20180827_124605.jpg  


  86. #286
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    17
    Beautiful place, I've only see tromso from airplane heading to spitzbergen hope to come back with the bike in the future

  87. #287
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    117
    Is that from TromsÝ?
    Beautiful pictures, maybe I should take a trip down there next year, was thinking of going to Lyngen and Lofoten anyway, might as well drop by TromsÝ on the way.

  88. #288
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    Yeah. It's TromsÝ. Let me know if you need a guide.

  89. #289
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPaulus View Post
    Yeah. It's TromsÝ. Let me know if you need a guide.
    Will probably have to take you up on that offer if you're still in TromsÝ next year.

    Anyone here have some time on an Evolink 131?
    How does it climb?
    Does it feel sluggish with such progressive geo?

  90. #290
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ucsbwsr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    277
    Just FYI there is a complete Pole Evolink 158 M Blue for complete for sale on Pinkbike, this is the same gentleman who I bought my 150 from:
    https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2447718/

    ...and an XL Evolink 158 Black frame for sale, if you reference me while purchasing the frame I might get a free XLT sweatshirt out of it, if that isn't incentive I am not sure what is!
    https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2447218/

    Evan

    *if PB links are not allowed happy to remove.

  91. #291
    Here, diagonally!
    Reputation: JACKL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,012
    You sir, are the devil.

    I should be safe. I promised myself I would stick with 150 / 157 bikes...but dang...

  92. #292
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    @Ucsbwsr any idea why the 158s are being sold already?

  93. #293
    Here, diagonally!
    Reputation: JACKL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,012
    In the case of the XL, it is probably too big and too much bike for all but a few - just a guess. Which is one reason I am intrigued. Never had a bike that was big enough, much less too big. The XL Evo 29ers look like they have 26" wheels. I think it is safe to say it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea.

  94. #294
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ninjichor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by ucsbwsr View Post
    Just FYI there is a complete Pole Evolink 158 M Blue for complete for sale on Pinkbike, this is the same gentleman who I bought my 150 from:
    https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2447718/

    1300 wheelbase, wow. I guess that's one way to balance out the 455 chainstays, though I'd think 1325+ is a better match for 455 chainstays, so I'm guessing whoever tested their bikes probably dialed in the large and just did the usual +/- 20mm for the different sizes. Sounds like a bike that begs for high speed.

    Wonder if dynamic geo from the fork travel compression messes things up enough for Leo to consider a linkage fork (https://www.motion-ride.com/en/).

  95. #295
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    12,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Zerort View Post
    I would stick with what the owner of Pole recommends. 51mm

    I'm sure Leo has tried various offset forks during his testing.

    You could even read some Facebook threads in the Pole riders group or ask the question there.
    FYI - Leo's personal bike is running a low offset fork - 42mm.

    https://polebicycles.com/the-tipping-point/
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  96. #296
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PurpleMtnSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    646
    FYI I noticed the evolink 158 shop page listed the fork offset at 42mm, but the geo chart listed 46-51mm. So I emailed for clarification and to see if Leo had changed his philosophy. The response I got was that was a typo and the shop page has since been updated to 51 mm.

    Old screen shot:

  97. #297
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ninjichor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    384
    Yea, if I were to make a custom bike, I'd go for 38 offset, and combine it with steeper HTA and much longer reach, in order to avoid dynamic geo changing so much for a long travel fork. It's a work around to telescopic forks being a pain for balancing weight distro between the front and back, yet wanting high speed stability (not to mention the fork demanding more stiffness to handle impact forces not in line with its angle). If I could switch to linkage, I'd align it to minimize feedback from bumps and minimize traction loss from the wheel seeing weight balance swings (akin to pushing hard through a turn and roosting, but more unpredictable).

    I think reach is too short for many riders. I have af riend that thinks his reach sweet spot is 445. That's the reach I have on my bike, and I'm 5' 7" and he's 6' 2" or so, saying that he's in between L and XLs (he likes old school '13 Bronson, RFX, slack STA stuff), wanting a seat tube that's 20" or less and ETT of 25". He's trying to get the bars higher recently, asking if I had a 50mm stem with at least 6d rise, getting a 35mm rise bar to replace his current one, since I told him how the SRAM manual says that you shouldn't have more than 30mm of spacers under your stem... picture this:

    Name:  fundamentalsattack.gif
Views: 432
Size:  93.1 KB


    If you measure from leg socket to shoulder socket, you will get a combined reach and stem measurement, that puts you over your bike like this:

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-bzp2h1r.jpg

    This is Leo on his large Evolink (510mm reach):

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-leo_ek4.jpg

    I like to have my elbows bent and behind my grips, rather than above and boxed out to the sides. This guy's grips are practically where his knees are, and his neck is tilted back... doesn't look comfy, while Leo's looks good.

    If you measure your crotch to collarbone, you get a much much longer measurement for combined reach and stem. I'll call it your theoretical comfortable max. Mine's 610, while my leg socket to shoulder socket is 490. I used to ride 425mm bikes with 70mm stems... now I'm hungry for much longer reach, speed and DH prowess (longer wheelbase), and overall weight distro balance (rear center to front center ratio, e.g. 420mm cs to 1150mm wb, 430 cs to 1200 wb, 450 to 1300, etc), since I find that the times I'm out of the saddle, I demand more control. Also, I want to emphasize customized chassis stiffness, according to the inertia/impacts seen, as someone weighing in at 70kg/155 lbs all geared up, doesn't need oversized tubing that feels lifeless (looking at you Kona, learning a thing or two from Specialized size specific tubing). Those tubes might feel good for a big rider, hucking to flat, but I think a bit of springiness/compliance does wonders for the ride experience.

  98. #298
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RS VR6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,386
    Quote Originally Posted by ninjichor View Post
    Yea, if I were to make a custom bike, I'd go for 38 offset, and combine it with steeper HTA and much longer reach, in order to avoid dynamic geo changing so much for a long travel fork. It's a work around to telescopic forks being a pain for balancing weight distro between the front and back, yet wanting high speed stability (not to mention the fork demanding more stiffness to handle impact forces not in line with its angle). If I could switch to linkage, I'd align it to minimize feedback from bumps and minimize traction loss from the wheel seeing weight balance swings (akin to pushing hard through a turn and roosting, but more unpredictable).

    I think reach is too short for many riders. I have af riend that thinks his reach sweet spot is 445. That's the reach I have on my bike, and I'm 5' 7" and he's 6' 2" or so, saying that he's in between L and XLs (he likes old school '13 Bronson, RFX, slack STA stuff), wanting a seat tube that's 20" or less and ETT of 25". He's trying to get the bars higher recently, asking if I had a 50mm stem with at least 6d rise, getting a 35mm rise bar to replace his current one, since I told him how the SRAM manual says that you shouldn't have more than 30mm of spacers under your stem... picture this:

    Name:  fundamentalsattack.gif
Views: 432
Size:  93.1 KB


    If you measure from leg socket to shoulder socket, you will get a combined reach and stem measurement, that puts you over your bike like this:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BZp2h1r.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	59.2 KB 
ID:	1218219

    This is Leo on his large Evolink (510mm reach):

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	leo_ek4.jpg 
Views:	84 
Size:	165.6 KB 
ID:	1218220

    I like to have my elbows bent and behind my grips, rather than above and boxed out to the sides. This guy's grips are practically where his knees are, and his neck is tilted back... doesn't look comfy, while Leo's looks good.

    If you measure your crotch to collarbone, you get a much much longer measurement for combined reach and stem. I'll call it your theoretical comfortable max. Mine's 610, while my leg socket to shoulder socket is 490. I used to ride 425mm bikes with 70mm stems... now I'm hungry for much longer reach, speed and DH prowess (longer wheelbase), and overall weight distro balance (rear center to front center ratio, e.g. 420mm cs to 1150mm wb, 430 cs to 1200 wb, 450 to 1300, etc), since I find that the times I'm out of the saddle, I demand more control. Also, I want to emphasize customized chassis stiffness, according to the inertia/impacts seen, as someone weighing in at 70kg/155 lbs all geared up, doesn't need oversized tubing that feels lifeless (looking at you Kona, learning a thing or two from Specialized size specific tubing). Those tubes might feel good for a big rider, hucking to flat, but I think a bit of springiness/compliance does wonders for the ride experience.
    That's pretty interesting. I do wonder about reach being too short...or too long. I think some people just don't really know if their reach is too long or too short...I including myself. I just think that most people just go by what feels good to them (or what the internet tells them).

    Here is are the only pics of me on my bike. It's a Banshee Spitfire in medium. The reach is ~430 and I'm using a 40mm stem. The Evolink 131 is on my short list of frames I want. I wonder if the medium is too big. I got to pedal around a medium at Sea Otter. The fit actually feels ok...but the bike itself felt really long. I wonder if I would size down to a small?

    I'm 5'8" with a 30 inseam.

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-img_7376.jpg

    Everyone wants to ride my Pole-screenshot_20180324-222301.jpg

  99. #299
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bannerman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    160
    Quote Originally Posted by RS VR6 View Post
    That's pretty interesting. I do wonder about reach being too short...or too long. I think some people just don't really know if their reach is too long or too short...I including myself. I just think that most people just go by what feels good to them (or what the internet tells them).

    Here is are the only pics of me on my bike. It's a Banshee Spitfire in medium. The reach is ~430 and I'm using a 40mm stem. The Evolink 131 is on my short list of frames I want. I wonder if the medium is too big. I got to pedal around a medium at Sea Otter. The fit actually feels ok...but the bike itself felt really long. I wonder if I would size down to a small?

    I'm 5'8" with a 30 inseam.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7376.jpg 
Views:	179 
Size:	457.8 KB 
ID:	1218247

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_20180324-222301.jpg 
Views:	172 
Size:	62.0 KB 
ID:	1218248
    Iím an inch short than you and my new bike has a reach of 460, feels amazing. Go for the medium

  100. #300
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    83
    No doubt. Go for the medium. I have a medium evolink 158, and my gf is fine riding it, she is 168cm.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What would you do? Pole
    By Finch Platte in forum Off Camber (off topic)
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 11-18-2015, 09:26 PM
  2. Saturday's Ride ... Bobcats fighting on Power Pole / Limekiln
    By ancient rascal in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-15-2014, 01:25 PM
  3. An Antartic bike ride unassisted to the South Pole
    By coastkid71 in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 338
    Last Post: 06-02-2014, 09:09 PM
  4. Christini 2wd Fat Bike for South Pole ride
    By shanesbw in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-12-2013, 01:28 PM
  5. Pole Hill
    By dutchman59 in forum Colorado - Front Range
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-10-2011, 10:42 PM

Members who have read this thread: 628

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.